throbber

`
`January 1977§9g
`
`Volume 6/Number 2
`
`Jflll
`
`_ of the Illuminating Engineering Society
`
`nghtlng In the logging and sawmill industries
`
`67
`
`Technical Committee Report
`
`Ultraviolet radiation—considerations ln interior lighting design
`R. E. Levin, G. Ft. Spears, G. W. Clark and E. D. Biokford
`
`Improved color rendition in high pressure mercury vapor lamps
`Mary V. Hoffman
`
`The design of safety-colors
`W. A. Thornton
`
`Tungsten-halogen lamp dosed with tin tetralodlde
`A. D. Kulkarni. J. Martin and H. G. Sell
`
`An automated high-speed photometer
`I'_. C. Snyder and P. E. Westlake
`
`80
`
`89
`
`92
`
`100
`
`105
`
`Recommended practice for the specification of an ESI rating in
`interior spaces when specitic task locations are unknown
`
`111
`
`Technical Committee Report
`
`Discussion of previously publlshed papers
`
`124
`
`I.
`
`w
`
`.A‘T'
`
`I Il
`
`_
`
`I
`
`ished quarterly in the United States of America by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. 345
`:4'nh St.. New York. N.Y. 10017. Copyright. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. 197?. Sec-
`class postage paid at New York. N.Y. and additional mailing ottlces. This publication is indexed regularly
`Engineering Index. inc... and is available on microfilm from University Microfilm, Ann Arbor. Mich. 43106.
`scription rates: $25.00 for few annual issues. plus extra postage to all countries In which second-class postage
`3 do not apply. Single copies: $2.50 to members: $6.25 to nonmembers. Editorial Office. 345 East 47th St..
`' York. N.Y. 1001?. Printing Office. Easton. Pa.
`
`-
`Clifford L' Forbes J" EdItor
`Jack F- Christensen Associate Editor
`John E. Kaut'man Technical Director
`
`Howard Haynes Engineering Assistant
`
`C. L. Crouch Director of Research lERl
`
`
`
`TCL 1021, Page 1
`TCL 1021;
`
`
`
`n'ltma'«I43.x.
`AA
`$13,111
`or-
`.—.I..-
`
`.‘
`
`‘e.
`
`;Inn-I...
`“-19.—-
`
`$3
`neith-
`
`

`

`
`
`Improved color rendition
`in high pressure me’icury vapor lamps
`
`Mary V. Hoffman
`
`The addition of Y3Ai5012:0e to the group of phosphors suitable for color
`
`correcting the mercury discharge lamp provides for Improving the color
`
`rendering Index without a lumen loss. By altering the cerium content in the
`
`tormulatlon, the absorption and brightness can be adjusted to its optimum
`
`value in the lamp.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TCL 1021, Page 2
`TCL 1021 i‘
`89
`
`this substitution. Combinations of these two phos-
`phors can be used, as described by Rokosz, et GL4
`We have found another phosphor, cerium-acti-
`vated yttrium aluminate garnet (YAG:Ce) which is
`useful in improving color rendition by absorbing the
`blue Hg radiation and also adds to the total emission
`of the lamp by converting this blue radiation into
`emission centered at 560 nanometers. It can be
`combined with the Y(VP)O4:Eu emission, effectively
`changing the Color of the lamp.
`Lamps prepared with blends of YAG:Ce and YVP
`phosphors Show the shift in color points from below
`the black body to, on, or above the locus, depending
`on the proportions used. Typical color points are
`shown in Fig. 1 for a warm color corrected lamp. The
`
`Figure 1. Color shifts with increasing YAG:Ce In YlVP)
`04:Eu.
`
`YAOO
`
`.4l0
`
`.390
`
`.400
`
`.410
`
`.420
`
`.430
`
`I
`
`The ideal in color rendition of a high pressure mer-
`cury discharge lamp has been the subject of several
`recent papers, in which simulated spectral distribu-
`tions have been created by the addition or subtrac-
`tion of spectral energy.1-2 This can be done to obtain
`lamps of selected color temperatures, with various
`combinations of real and simulated phosphor emis—
`sions. The optimization of the luminous efficiency
`can be calculated in the same manner. One study has
`shown that the addition of emission at 620 nanome-
`
`ters to the Hg discharge is near the optimum for color
`rendition, but that for lamps with color temperature
`of 4000 to 3000 kelvins, it is necessary to remove some
`of the Hg discharge in the blue. For luminosity, ad—
`ditizoan of emission near 590 nanometers is need-
`ed. -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Among the existing phosphors meeting the tem-
`
`perature and stability requirements of the mercury
`
`discharge lamps, only Y V04zEu and Y(VP)04:Eu
`
`phosphors (YVP) supply emission at the necessary
`
`spectral region, with the main peak at 618 nanome-
`
`ters. They do not provide absorption of the blue Hg
`
`lines in sufficient amount or emission in the high
`
`luminous region. Filtering of the blue can be obtained
`
`by the addition of a pigment or of a phosphor which
`
`also acts as a pigment. The phosphor magnesium
`
`fluogermanate activated with manganese (MG) is the
`
`only suitable red emitter with appreciable absorption
`
`of the blue lines, but since the emission is at 650 to
`
`660 nanometers, the luminosity is not enhanced by
`
`A paper presented at the Annual IES Conference. August ‘29
`
`through September 2, 1976, Cleveland, Ohio. AUTHOR: General
`
`Electric Company, Cleveland, Ohio.
`
`
`

`

`
`
`color shift is due largely to the absorption of the 436
`nanometer Hg line, which is filtered by about 40
`percent with 15 percent YAG in the blend. The lu-
`minosity of the lamps remains about the same for
`four lamp colors shown. This is due to the efficient
`conversion of the 436 Hg line into visible emission.
`These data are summarized in Table I.
`
`The actual color points obtained can be varied by
`the amount of phosphor used on the lamp as well as
`the proportion of YAG:Ce in the blend. It can also be
`
`varied by using the blend over a pre-coat, as de-
`scribed by Rokosz, et all.4 The pro-coat acts as a re-
`flector for both ultraviolet and the blue radiation,
`allowing better utilization of the Hg radiation by the
`phosphors. With the YAG:Ce present, the reflection
`of the blue radiation increases its effect both as a
`
`pigment and as a phosphor.
`The YAGzCe phosphor, which was developed for
`its emission characteristics under cathode ray exci-
`tation516 is strongly absorbing in the blue, as shown
`
`to
`
`0.9
`
`0.8
`
`0.?
`
`0.6
`
`0.5
`
`0.4
`
`0.3
`
`
`
`DIFFUSEREFLECTANCE
`
`
`
`RELATIVE1NTENS'ITY
`
`300
`
`400
`
`500
`
`600
`
`T00
`
`WAVELENGTH, n m
`
`L...—._J_.L_L__
`330 340 350 360
`nm
`
`
`420
`430 440 450 460
`470 480
`
`WAVELENGTHm m
`
`Figure 2. Diffuse Reflectance curve, "2.925 Gem-,5);
`Also”.
`
`Figure 3. Excltation curve: detected wavelength—511
`nanometers.
`
`Figure 4. Emission curve: excitation wavelength—436
`nanometers.
`
`Figure 5. Emission intensity vs cerium content. measured
`at 25° c and 300° c. Excitatlon wavelength—436 nm.
`_._—-.-—
`
`at 25°C
`
`
`RELATIVE1NTENSITY
`
`
`/
`/-—u1 25° c
`
`no
`
`lNTENSITY 8
`
`I00
`
`TO
`
`0.005 0.010
`
`0.030
`
`0.020
`1
`
`JOURNAL OF IESIJANUARY 197?
`TCL 1021, Page 3
`TCL 1021, Page 3
`
`
`
`sec
`
`720
`
`I
`
`430
`
`500 640
`520 560
`WAVELENGTH, n m
`
`90
`
`

`

`Table l—Lamp data:YAG:Ce with YlVPlo, :Eu
`Percent
`loo—hour
`
` YAG:Ce lmlw X Y
`
`
`
`
`
`0
`5
`10
`15
`
`51.5
`52.1
`50.7
`51.3
`
`.408
`.411
`.420
`.426
`
`.384
`.394
`.403
`.411
`
`CRI
`
`45
`—
`—
`51
`
`4. F'. Rokosz, J. W. Sauaville, and J. Van Broekhoven, “Incu-
`descent lamp color with high-intensity discharge lamps," JOUR-
`NAL or THE ILLUMINATING ENGINEERING SOCIETY, Vol. 3, No.
`1, October 1973, p. 95.
`5. G. Blasse and A. Bril, “A new phosphor for flying-spot cath-
`ode-ray tubes for color television: yellow-emitting Y3A15012:Ce,"
`Applied Physics Letters, Vol. II, No. 2, July 15, 1967, p. 53.
`6. W. W. Holloway, Jr. and M. Kestigian, “Optical propertim of
`cerium-activated garnet crystals,“ Journal of the Optical Society
`of America, Vol. 59, No. 1, January 1969, p. 60.
`
`by the diffuse reflectance curve (see Fig. 2), and is
`also excited by this radiation. This absorption is into
`the 5d state of the cerium, which in this crystal
`structure, lies in an unusual position. Cerium usually
`absorbs in the ultraviolet and emits inthe near ul-
`
`traviolet or in the blue. The YAG:Ce phosphor is not
`excited by 254 nanometers and only weakly by 365
`nanometers from the Hg arc. The excitation spectra
`(See Fig. 3) shows the very strong dependence of-the
`emission intensity on the 436-nm Hg radiation.
`The emission of the phosphor is in a band peaking
`at about 540 nanometers at 25 ° C shifting to about
`560 nanometers at 300° C (See Fig. 4). This is at the
`maximum eye sensitivity and close to the calculated
`peak of 590 nm for good lumen output in the sys-
`tem.
`
`As with most phosphors, the specific conditions of
`the lamp determine its applicability, and the com-
`position can often be altered according to its use. In
`the YAG:Ce phosphor, the cerium concentration is
`the critical factor. Both the absorption at .436 na-
`nometers and the emission intensity increase with
`the cerium concentration with the brightness
`reaching a maximum at about one- to two-atom
`percent and the absorption at about three-atom
`percent when measured at 25° C. At the temperature
`of operation of the lamp, the phosphor is less effi-
`cient, and brightness measurements made at 300° C
`show that lower cerium concentrations are desirable.
`
`As shown in Fig. 5, a rather narrow range of cerium
`content must be maintained for the best conversion
`
`of 436 radiation to emission at 560 nm in the lamp.
`
`References
`
`l. J. J. Opstelten, D. Radielovié and W. L. Wanmaker, “The
`choice and evaluation of phosphors for application to lamps with
`improved color rendition,“ Journal of the Electrochemical So-
`ciety, Vol. 120. No. 10. October 1973, p. 1400.
`2. T. F. Soules and M. A. Meier, “Optimized spectral power dis-
`tributions for mercury vapor lamps," Journal of the Electro-
`chemical Society, Vol. 121, No. 3, March 1974, p. 407.
`3. H. Ivey, “Color and efficiency of fluorescent and fluoro-
`rescent-mercury lamps," Journal of the Optical Society of
`America, Vol. 62, 1972, p. 814.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`W. A. THORNTON" The high pressure mercury vapor lamp is
`in need of all the kindly attention it can get. This welcome paper
`brings better lamp performance closer. It performs a service by
`bringing another useful phosphor into the very limited line-up of
`luminescent materials that can endure the operating conditions
`in this lamp. The new phosphor has the useful property of com
`verting undesired blue-violet arc emission to desired green light,
`which tends to improve both color rendering and output. Does the
`increase in Color Rendering Index (CRI), as 15 percent of the new
`phosphor is added, represent a real visual improvement in color
`rendering of real objects and scenes? As to the proposed addition
`of yellow wavelengths near 590 nanoeters “for good lumen output.
`in the lamp system,” we believe that such addition would harm
`color rendering more than it would improve lumen output. The
`usefulness of the new YAG:Ce phosphor is, we believe, due to the
`fact {see Fig. 4) that it contributes green light and red light; that
`it also contributes yellow light is a disadvantage. The Scales and
`Meier study (see Reference 2) makes clear that peak lumen output
`by use of yellow light is accompanied by color rendering index of
`—20. Reference 1 ascribes poor color rendering to yellow emitting
`phosphors. Has the author any prospect of an efficient phosphor
`emitting a narrow band near 490 nanometers, which, according
`to the same references, can help raise CRI further?
`
`Aura-Ion:l The true test of improved color rendition always rests
`on a subjective visual evaluation, especially in a system such as this
`one, with about ten percent calculated change in CRI. No sys-
`tematic evaluation of this lamp system has been made, but the
`general appearances have been favorable.
`The emission contribution of YAG:Ce (if present as the only
`phosphor) would definitely result in a lower CRI. The Soules and
`Maier paper points to a system that closely approximates a pure
`YAG:Ce lamp. It has a CRI of 23. The usefulness of the YAG:Ce
`lies in its ability to absorb the 436-nm Hg line to the extent suffi-
`cient to improve the CRI, and supply enough emission to con-
`tribute to the lumen level. at a relatively low weight percent.
`The Scales and Meier paper ascribes the CR1 of ---20 to a system
`containing a narrow band emission at 580 nanometers. when
`combined with bluer line emission, but shows that when Eu.+3
`emission is present the CR] cannot fall that low.
`"‘ Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Bloomfield, New Jersey.
`1‘ The author wishes to acknowledge the help of Dr. T. F. Soules
`for numerous discussions and E. Homonnay for the testing in
`lamps.
`
`Information for authors
`
`to the review at the Papers Committee of the IE6.
`
`The JOURNAL OF THE IE5 is publlahed quarterly by the Iilurnlnailng Engl-
`neerlng Soclety of North America. Manuscripts should be senl to the editor,
`345 East 47th Street, New York, N. Y. 10017. All manuscrlpts are subject
`
`JOURNAL OF “is I JANUARY 1977
`
`
`
`"glam-194“...
`
`
`
`_‘km—l‘s‘M
`
`'L..—fl-i--.~...—4_...I.ai.___'..—.—‘-..__:-.'
`
`91
`.
`TCL 1021, Page 4
`TCL 1021
`
`

`

`
`
`TCL 1021, Page 5
`TCL 1021, Page 5
`
`

`

`:5
`.‘3r
`,Sr
`‘3.
`3
`
`ILLUMINATING 2
`ENGINEERING 3%
`
`SOCIETY
`
`JOURNAL
`
`5-7
`
`OCT. 1975-
`JULY 1978
`
`TCL 1021, Page 6
`
`#fi-'£a‘.:;mifl#iyau£m
`
`enmiiiaiz.-w£éi%&g'filii€uaimfl;swm.
`
`
`.I.wmu=imu-fiwamaarh-‘ammmaids:nm-LiW-firfi
`
`.3
`3
`
`
`
`Ell-WP“:.»:a‘,;;.:.....35
`
`
`NE
`
`
`C I
`
`
`
`II
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IIII'IIIIIIIIII‘IIIIIIIIII'II’IIIIII’III‘
`
`,,
`
`
`
`
`9314
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket