IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`NICHIA CORPORATION,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`TCL MULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGY
`HOLDINGS, LTD. and
`TTE TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) C.A. No. 16-681-RGA
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES
`TO NICHIA CORPORATION'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS
`FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS
`
`NICHIA EX2005
`
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`NICHIA CORPORATION,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`TCL MULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGY
`HOLDINGS, LTD. and
`TTE TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) C.A. No. 16-681-RGA
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES
`TO NICHIA CORPORATION'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS
`FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS
`
`NICHIA EX2005
`
`
`
`own files; and (vii) it seeks information about a time period that has no bearing on Plaintiffs
`
`claims.
`
`Subject to and without waiving the foregoing general and specific objections, Defendants
`
`will produce relevant, non-privileged documents responsive to this request in Defendants'
`
`possession, custody, and control that are located after a reasonably diligent search.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 50:
`
`All Documents, including Communications with any third party, Concerning the
`
`preparation and/or filing of the petitions for inter partes review filed by VIZIO, Inc. with the
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, which petitions have been assigned Case Nos. IPR2017-
`
`00552, IPR2017-00551, IPR2017-00558, and IPR2017-00556.
`
`RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 50:
`
`Defendants incorporate by reference the General Objections above, as if fully set forth
`
`herein. Defendants further object to this request to the extent that: (i) it seeks information
`
`protected by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine, and/or other
`
`applicable privileges and protections, including the joint defense privilege and common interest
`
`doctrine; (ii) it seeks information that is neither relevant nor proportional to the needs of the case;
`
`(iii) it is vague, ambiguous, overly broad and unduly burdensome, especially due to
`
`incorporating the terms "Concerning"; (iv) it is overly broad and unduly burdensome, especially
`
`because it seeks "[a]ll" documents; (v) it seeks information unrelated to Plaintiffs infringement
`
`claims and, further, is duplicative of other requests; and (vi) it seeks information or documents
`
`that are either publicly available or are contained in Plaintiffs own files.
`
`46
`
`NICHIA EX2005
`
`
`
`Subject to and without waiving the foregoing general and specific objections, Defendants
`
`will produce relevant, non-privileged documents responsive to this request in Defendants'
`
`possession, custody, and control that are located after a reasonably diligent search.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 51:
`
`Documents sufficient to identify the quantity of all Accused Products made, used,
`
`licensed, distributed, supplied, sold, or offered for sale in the United States, on a monthly,
`
`quarterly, and annual basis.
`
`RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 51:
`
`Defendants incorporate by reference the General Objections above, as if fully set forth
`
`herein. Defendants further object to this request to the extent that: (i) it seeks information
`
`protected by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine, and/or other
`
`applicable privileges and protections, including the joint defense privilege and common interest
`
`doctrine; (ii) it seeks information that is neither relevant nor proportional to the needs of the case;
`
`(iii) it is vague, ambiguous, overly broad and unduly burdensome; (iv) it is overly broad and
`
`unduly burdensome; (v) it seeks information unrelated to Plaintiffs infringement claims and,
`
`further, is duplicative of other requests; and (vi) it seeks information or documents that are either
`
`publicly available or are contained in Plaintiffs own files.
`
`Subject to and without waiving the foregoing general and specific objections, Defendants
`
`will produce relevant, non-privileged documents responsive to this request in Defendants'
`
`possession, custody, and control that are located after a reasonably diligent search.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 52:
`
`All Documents that Defendants intend to rely upon to support its determination of
`
`damages for its infringement of the Asserted Patents.
`
`47
`
`NICHIA EX2005
`
`
`
`Subject to and without waiving the foregoing general and specific objections, Defendants
`
`will produce relevant, non-privileged documents about the Asserted Patents that are responsive
`
`to this request in Defendants' possession, custody, and control that ~relocated after a reasonably
`
`diligent search, as they pertain to Nichia Corporation v. VIZIO, Inc., 8:16-cv-00545 (C.D. Cal.).
`
`DATED: March 20,2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`OF COUNSEL
`
`Raymond N. Nimrod
`James M. Glass
`Gregory C. Wyckoff
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
`LLP
`51 Madison A venue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10001
`Tel: (415) 875-6600
`raynimrod@quinnemanuel.com
`jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`gregorywyckoff@quinnemanuel.com
`
`By
`Is/ Arthur G. Connollv
`Arthur G. Connolly, III (No. 2667)
`CONNOLLY GALLAGHER LLP
`Brandywine Building
`1000 North West Street, 14th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Telephone: (302)757-7300
`Fax: (302) 757-7299
`
`Attorneys for Defendants TCL Multimedia
`Technology Holdings, Ltd. and TTE Technology,
`Inc.
`
`74
`
`NICHIA EX2005
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on March 20, 2017, copies of the foregoing were caused to be served
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`upon the following in the manner indicated:
`
`Jack B. Blumenfeld, Esquire
`Brian P. Egan, Esquire
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL
`LLP
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`Catherine Nyarady , Esquire
`Daniel J. Klein, Esquire
`David E. Cole, Esquire
`Kenneth A. Gallo, Esquire
`PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON &
`GARRISON LLP
`1285 A venue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10019
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`Is/ Arthur G. Connolly
`Arthur G. Connolly, III (No. 2667)
`
`75
`
`NICHIA EX2005
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
