throbber
NDA 21-153/S-027
`NDA 21-689/S-008
`Page 3
`
`NEXIUM®
`(esomeprazole magnesium)
`DELAYED-RELEASE CAPSULES
`
`NEXIUM®
`(esomeprazole magnesium)
`FOR DELAYED-RELEASE ORAL SUSPENSION
`
`Rx only
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`The active ingredient in NEXIUM® (esomeprazole magnesium) Delayed-Release Capsules and
`NEXIUM (esomeprazole magnesiumtFor Delayed-Release Oral Suspension is bis(5-methoxy-2-[(S)(cid:173)
`[ ( 4-methoxy-3,5-dimethyl-2-pyridinyl)methyl ]sulfinyl ]-lH-benzimidazole-1-yl) magnesium trihydrate,
`a compound that inhibits gastric acid secretion. Esomeprazole is the S-isomer of omeprazole, which is
`a mixture of the S- and R- isomers. Its molecular formula is (C17H1sN303S)2Mg x 3 H20 with
`molecular weight of 767.2 as a trihydrate and 713.1 on an anhydrous basis. The structural formula is:
`
`The magnesium salt is a white to slightly colored crystalline powder. It contains 3 moles of water of
`salvation and is slightly soluble in water.
`
`The stability of esomeprazole magnesium is a function of pH; it rapidly degrades in acidic media, but it
`has acceptable stability under alkaline conditions. At pH 6.8 (buffer), the half-life of the magnesium
`salt is about 19 hours at 25°C and about 8 hours at 37°C.
`
`NEXIUM is supplied in delayed-release capsules and in packets for a delayed-release oral suspension.
`Each delayed-release capsule contains 20 mg or 40 mg of esomeprazole (present as 22.3 mg or 44.5
`mg esomeprazole magnesium trihydrate) in the form of enteric-coated granules with the following
`inactive ingredients: glyceryl monostearate 40-55, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hypromellose, magnesium
`stearate, methacrylic acid copolymer type C, polysorbate 80, sugar spheres, talc, and triethyl citrate.
`The capsule shells have the following inactive ingredients: gelatin, FD&C Blue #1, FD&C Red #40,
`D&C Red #28, titanium dioxide, shellac, ethyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, n-butyl alcohol, propylene
`glycol, sodium hydroxide, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, and D&C Yellow #10.
`
`Each packet of NEXIUM For Delayed-Release Oral Suspension contains 20 mg or 40 mg of
`esomeprazole, in the form of the same enteric-coated granules used in NEXIUM Delayed-Release
`Capsules, and also inactive granules. The inactive granules are composed of the following ingredients:
`dextrose, xanthan gum, crospovidone, citric acid, iron oxide, and hydroxypropyl cellulose. The
`
`MYL-EN000523782
`
`Page 1 of 37
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2057
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`NDA 21-153/S-027
`NDA 21-689/S-008
`Page 4
`
`esomeprazole granules and inactive granules are constituted with water to form a suspension and are
`given by oral, nasogastric or gastric administration.
`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`Pharmacokinetics
`Absorption
`NEXIUM Delayed-Release Capsules and NEXIUM For Delayed-Release Oral Suspension contain a
`bioequivalent enteric-coated granule formulation of esomeprazole magnesium. Bioequivalency is
`based on a single dose (40 mg) study in 94 healthy male and female=volunteers under fasting condition.
`After oral administration peak plasma levels (Cmax) occur at approximately 1.5 hours (Tmax). The Cmax
`increases proportionally when the dose is increased, and there is a three-fold increase in the area under
`the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from 20 to 40 mg. At repeated once-daily dosing with 40
`mg, the systemic bioavailability is approximately 90% compared to 64% after a single dose of 40 mg.
`The mean exposure (AUC) to esomeprazole increases from 4.32 µmol *hr/L on day 1 to 11.2
`µmol *hr/Lon day 5 after 40 mg once daily dosing.
`
`The AUC after administration of a single 40 mg dose of esomeprazole is decreased by 43-53% after
`food intake compared to fasting conditions. Esomeprazole should be taken at least one hour before
`meals.
`
`The pharmacokinetic profile of esomeprazole was determined in 36 patients with symptomatic
`gastroesophageal reflux disease following repeated once daily administration of 20 mg and 40 mg
`capsules ofNEXIUM over a period of five days. The results are shown in the following table:
`
`Pharmacokinetic Parameters of NEXIUM on Day 5 Following Oral Dosing for 5 Days
`Parameter* (CV)
`NEXIUM
`NEXIUM
`40 mg
`20 mg
`12.6 (42%)
`4.2 (59%)
`AUC (µmol.h/L)
`4.7 (37%)
`2.1 (45%)
`Cmax (µmol/L)
`1.6
`1.6
`T max (h)
`1.5
`1.2
`1112 (h)
`*Values represent the geometric mean, except the Tma"' which is the arithmetic mean; CV= Coefficient of variation
`
`Distribution
`Esomeprazole is 97% bound to plasma proteins. Plasma protein binding is constant over the
`concentration range of 2-20 µmol/L. The apparent volume of distribution at steady state in healthy
`volunteers is approximately 16 L.
`
`Metabolism
`Esomeprazole is extensively metabolized in the liver by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system.
`The metabolites of esomeprazole lack antisecretory activity. The major part of esomeprazole's
`metabolism is dependent upon the CYP2C 19 isoenzyme, which forms the hydroxy and desmethyl
`metabolites. The remaining amount is dependent on CYP3A4 which forms the sulphone metabolite.
`CYP2Cl9 isoenzyme exhibits polymorphism in the metabolism of esomeprazole, since some 3% of
`Caucasians and 15-20% of Asians lack CYP2C 19 and are termed Poor metabolizers. At steady state,
`the ratio of AUC in Poor metabolizers to AUC in the rest of the population (Extensive metabolizers) is
`approximately 2.
`
`MYL-EN000523783
`
`Page 2 of 37
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2057
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`NDA 21-153/S-027
`NDA 21-689/S-008
`Page 5
`
`Following administration of equimolar doses, the S- and R-isomers are metabolized differently by the
`liver, resulting in higher plasma levels of the S- than of the R-isomer.
`
`Excretion
`The plasma elimination half-life of esomeprazole is approximately 1-1.5 hours. Less than 1 % of parent
`drug is excreted in the urine. Approximately 80% of an oral dose of esomeprazole is excreted as
`inactive metabolites in the urine, and the remainder is found as inactive metabolites in the feces.
`
`Special Populations
`Geriatric
`The AUC and Cmaxvalues were slightly higher (25% and 18%, respectively) in the elderly as compared
`to younger subjects at steady state. Dosage adjustment based on age is not necessary.
`
`Pediatric
`12 to 17 Years of Age
`The pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole were studied in 28 adolescent patients with GERD aged 12 to
`17 years inclusive, in a single center study. Patients were randomized to receive esomeprazole 20 mg
`or 40 mg once daily for 8 days. Mean Cmax and AUC values of esomeprazole were not affected by
`body weight or age; and more than dose-proportional increases in mean Cmax and AUC values were
`observed between the two dose groups in the study. Overall, esomeprazole pharmacokinetics in
`adolescent patients aged 12 to 17 years were similar to those observed in adult patients with
`symptomatic GERD.
`
`Comparison of PK Parameters in 12 to 17 Year Olds with GERD and
`Adults with Symptomatic GERD Following the Repeated Daily Oral Dose
`Administration of Esomeprazole*
`
`Adults (N=36)
`12 to 17 Year Olds (N=28)
`Parameter
`20mg
`40mg
`20mg
`40mg
`4.2
`12.6
`3.65
`13.86
`AUC (µmol*h/L)
`2.1
`4.7
`1.45
`5.13
`Cmax (µmol/L)
`1.6
`1.6
`2.00
`1.75
`1max (h)
`1.5
`1.2
`0.82
`1.22
`ty,),,z (h)
`Data presented are geometric means for AUC, Cmax and t';,A.z, and median value for tmax·
`*Duration of treatment for 12 to 17 year olds and adults were 8 days and 5 days, respectively. Data were obtained from two
`independent studies.
`
`Gender
`The AUC and Cmax values were slightly higher (13%) in females than in males at steady state. Dosage
`adjustment based on gender is not necessary.
`
`Hepatic Insufficiency
`The steady state pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole obtained after administration of 40 mg once daily
`to 4 patients each with mild (Child Pugh A), moderate (Child Pugh Class B), and severe (Child Pugh
`Class C) liver insufficiency were compared to those obtained in 36 male and female GERD patients
`with normal liver function. In patients with mild and moderate hepatic insufficiency, the AUCs were
`within the range that could be expected in patients with normal liver function. In patients with severe
`hepatic insufficiency the AUCs were 2 to 3 times higher than in the patients with normal liver function.
`
`MYL-EN000523784
`
`Page 3 of 37
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2057
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`NDA 21-153/S-027
`NDA 21-689/S-008
`Page 6
`
`No dosage adjustment is recommended for patients with mild to moderate hepatic insufficiency (Child
`Pugh Classes A and B). However, in patients with severe hepatic insufficiency (Child Pugh Class C) a
`dose of 20 mg once daily should not be exceeded (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
`
`Renal Insufficiency
`The pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole in patients with renal impairment are not expected to be altered
`relative to healthy volunteers as less than 1 % of esomeprazole is excreted unchanged in urine.
`
`Pharmacokinetics: Combination Therapy with Antimicrobials
`Esomeprazole magnesium 40 mg once daily was given in combination with clarithromycin 500 mg
`twice daily and amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily for 7 days to 17 healthy male and female subjects.
`The mean steady state AUC and Cmax of esomeprazole increased by 70% and 18%, respectively during
`triple combination therapy compared to treatment with esomeprazole alone. The observed increase in
`esomeprazole exposure during co-administration with clarithromycin and amoxicillin is not expected
`to produce significant safety concerns.
`
`The pharmacokinetic parameters for clarithromycin and amoxicillin were similar during triple
`combination therapy and administration of each drug alone. However, the mean AUC and Cmax for 14-
`hydroxyclarithromycin increased by 19% and 22%, respectively, during triple combination therapy
`compared
`to
`treatment with clarithromycin alone. This
`increase m exposure
`to 14-
`hydroxyclarithromycin is not considered to be clinically significant.
`
`Pharmacodynamics
`Mechanism of Action
`Esomeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor that suppresses gastric acid secretion by specific inhibition of
`the H+/K+-ATPase in the gastric parietal cell. The S- and R-isomers of omeprazole are protonated and
`converted in the acidic compartment of the parietal cell forming the active inhibitor, the achiral
`sulphenamide. By acting specifically on the proton pump, esomeprazole blocks the final step in acid
`production, thus reducing gastric acidity. This effect is dose-related up to a daily dose of 20 to 40 mg
`and leads to inhibition of gastric acid secretion.
`
`Antisecretory Activity
`The effect of esomeprazole on intragastric pH was determined in patients with symptomatic
`gastroesophageal reflux disease in two separate studies. In the first study of 36 patients, NEXIUM 40
`mg and 20 mg capsules were administered over 5 days. The results are shown in the following table:
`
`Effect on Intragastric pH on Day 5 (N=36)
`Parameter
`NEXIUM
`NEXIUM
`40mg
`20mg
`70%*
`53%
`(16.8 h)
`(12.7 h)
`26%
`37%
`
`% Time Gastric
`pH >4t (Hours)
`Coefficient of
`variation
`Median 24 Hour pH 4.9*
`Coefficient of
`16%
`variation
`
`4.1
`27%
`
`t GASTRIC PH WAS MEASURED OVER A 24-HOUR PERIOD
`
`MYL-EN000523785
`
`Page 4 of 37
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2057
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`NDA 21-153/S-027
`NDA 21-689/S-008
`Page 7
`
`*p< 0. 01 NEXIUM 40 MG vs NEXIUM 20 MG
`
`In a second study, the effect on intragastric pH of NEXIUM 40 mg administered once daily over a five
`day period was similar to the first study,(% time with pH>4 was 68% or 16.3 hours).
`
`Serum Gastrin Effects
`The effect ofNEXIUM on serum gastrin concentrations was evaluated in approximately 2,700 patients
`in clinical trials up to 8 weeks and in over 1,300 patients for up to 6-12 months. The mean fasting
`gastrin level increased in a dose-related manner. This increase reached a plateau within two to three
`months of therapy and returned to baseline levels within four weeks after discontinuation of therapy.
`
`Enterochromaffin-like (EGL) Cell Effects
`In 24-month carcinogenicity studies of omeprazole in rats, a dose-related significant occurrence of
`gastric ECL cell carcinoid tumors and ECL cell hyperplasia was observed in both male and female
`animals (see PRECAUTIONS, Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility). Carcinoid
`tumors have also been observed in rats subjected to fundectomy or long-term treatment with other
`proton pump inhibitors or high doses of H2-receptor antagonists.
`
`Human gastric biopsy specimens have been obtained from more than 3,000 patients treated with
`omeprazole in long-term clinical trials. The incidence of ECL cell hyperplasia in these studies
`increased with time; however, no case of ECL cell carcinoids, dysplasia, or neoplasia has been found
`in these patients.
`
`In over 1,000 patients treated with NEXIUM (10, 20 or 40 mg/day) up to 6-12 months, the prevalence
`of ECL cell hyperplasia increased with time and dose. No patient developed ECL cell carcinoids,
`dysplasia, or neoplasia in the gastric mucosa.
`
`Endocrine Effects
`NEXIUM had no effect on thyroid function when given in oral doses of 20 or 40 mg for 4 weeks.
`Other effects of NEXIUM on the endocrine system were assessed using omeprazole studies.
`Omeprazole given in oral doses of 30 or 40 mg for 2 to 4 weeks had no effect on carbohydrate
`metabolism, circulating levels of parathyroid hormone, cortisol, estradiol, testosterone, prolactin,
`cholecystokinin or secretin.
`
`Microbiology
`Esomeprazole magnesium, amoxicillin and clarithromycin triple therapy has been shown to be active
`against most strains of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in vitro and in clinical infections as described in
`the Clinical Studies and INDICATIONS AND USAGE sections.
`
`Helicobacter
`Helicobacter pylori: Susceptibility testing of H. pylori isolates was performed for amoxicillin and
`clarithromycin using agar dilution methodology, and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were
`determined.
`
`Pretreatment Resistance: Clarithromycin pretreatment resistance rate (MIC ~ 1 µg/mL) to H. pylori
`was 15% (66/445) at baseline in all treatment groups combined. A total of> 99% (394/395) of
`patients had H. pylori isolates which were considered to be susceptible (MIC ::;; 0.25 µg/mL) to
`
`MYL-EN000523786
`
`Page 5 of 37
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2057
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`NDA 21-153/S-027
`NDA 21-689/S-008
`Page 8
`
`amoxicillin at baseline. One patient had a baseline H. pylori isolate with an amoxicillin MIC = 0.5
`µg/mL.
`
`Clarithromycin Susceptibility Test Results and Clinical/Bacteriologic Outcomes: The baseline H.
`pylori clarithromycin susceptibility results and the H. pylori eradication results at the Day 38 visit are
`shown in the table below:
`
`H. pylori
`negative
`(Eradicated)
`
`Clarithromycin
`Pretreatment
`Results
`
`Clarithromycin Susceptibility Test Results and Clinical/Bacteriological Outcomes a for Triple
`Therapy - (Esomeprazole magnesium 40 mg once daily/amoxicillin
`1000 mg twice daily/clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for
`10 days)
`H. pylori positive
`(Not Eradicated)
`Post-treatment susceptibility
`results
`Rb No MIC
`lb
`Sb
`Susceptibleb 182
`14
`2
`0
`4
`162
`Intermediateb
`1
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`Resistant0
`1
`2
`0
`29
`13
`13
`alncludes only patients with pretreatment and post-treatment clarithromycin susceptibility test results
`bSusceptible (S) MIC~ 0.25 µg/mL, Intermediate (I) MIC= 0.5 µg/mL, Resistant (R) MIC;:: 1.0 µg/mL
`
`Patients not eradicated of H. pylori following esomeprazole magnesium/amoxicillin/clarithromycin
`triple therapy will likely have clarithromycin resistant H. pylori isolates. Therefore, clarithromycin
`susceptibility testing should be done, when possible. Patients with clarithromycin resistant H. pylori
`should not be re-treated with a clarithromycin-containing regimen.
`
`Amoxicillin Susceptibility Test Results and Clinical/Bacteriological Outcomes:
`In the esomeprazole magnesium/amoxicillin/clarithromycin clinical trials, 83% (176/212) of the
`patients in the esomeprazole magnesium/amoxicillin/clarithromycin treatment group who had
`pretreatment amoxicillin susceptible MICs (:=:; 0.25 µg/mL) were eradicated of H. pylori, and 17%
`(36/212) were not eradicated of H. pylori. Of the 36 patients who were not eradicated of H. pylori on
`triple therapy, 16 had no post-treatment susceptibility test results and 20 had post-treatment H. pylori
`isolates with amoxicillin susceptible MICs. Fifteen of the patients who were not eradicated of H. pylori
`on triple therapy also had post-treatment H. pylori isolates with clarithromycin resistant MICs. There
`were no patients with H. pylori isolates who developed treatment emergent resistance to amoxicillin.
`
`Susceptibility Test for Helicobacter pylori: The reference methodology for susceptibility testing of
`H. pylori is agar dilution MICs. One to three microliters of an inoculum equivalent to a No.2
`McFarland standard (1 x 107
`- 1 x 108 CFU/mL for H. pylori) are inoculated directly onto freshly
`prepared antimicrobial containing Mueller-Hinton agar plates with 5% aged defibrinated sheep blood
`(;:: 2 weeks old). The agar dilution plates are incubated at 35°C in a microaerobic environment
`produced by a gas generating system suitable for Campylobacter. After 3 days of incubation, the MICs
`are recorded as the lowest concentration of antimicrobial agent required to inhibit growth of the
`organism. The clarithromycin and amoxicillin MIC values should be interpreted according to the
`following criteria:
`
`MYL-EN000523787
`
`Page 6 of 37
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2057
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`NDA 21-153/S-027
`NDA 21-689/S-008
`Page 9
`
`Clarithromycin MIC (µg/mL) a
`~ 0.25
`0.5
`2".1.0
`
`Interpretation
`Susceptible
`Intermediate
`Resistant
`
`(S)
`(I)
`(R)
`
`a
`
`Interpretation
`Amoxicillin MIC (µg/mL) a,b
`(S)
`Susceptible
`~ 0.25
`These are breakpoints for the agar dilution methodology and they should not be used to interpret results obtained using alternative
`methods.
`b
`There were not enough organisms with MICs > 0.25 µg/mL to determine a resistance breakpoint.
`
`Standardized susceptibility test procedures require the use of laboratory control microorganisms to
`control the technical aspects of the laboratory procedures. Standard clarithromycin and amoxicillin
`powders should provide the following MIC values:
`
`Microorganism
`
`MIC (µg/mL)
`
`a
`
`Antimicrobial
`Agent
`Clarithromycin
`
`H. pylori ATCC
`0.016- 0.12
`43504
`(µg/mL)
`H. pylori ATCC
`0.016- 0.12
`43504
`(µg/mL)
`a These are quality control ranges for the agar dilution methodology and they
`should not be used to control test results obtained using alternative methods.
`
`Amoxicillin
`
`Clinical Studies
`Healing of Erosive Esophagitis
`The healing rates ofNEXIUM 40 mg, NEXIUM 20 mg, and omeprazole 20 mg (the approved dose for
`this indication) were evaluated in patients with endoscopically diagnosed erosive esophagitis in four
`multicenter, double-blind, randomized studies. The healing rates at weeks 4 and 8 were evaluated and
`are shown in the table below:
`
`Erosive Esopha2itis Healin2 Rate (Life-Table Analysis)
`No. of
`Significance
`Level*
`Study Patients Treatment Groups
`1
`588
`NEXIUM20mg
`N.S.
`Omeprazole 20 mg
`588
`654
`NEXIUM40mg
`NEXIUM20mg
`656
`Omeprazole 20 mg
`650
`NEXIUM40mg
`576
`Omeprazole 20 mg
`572
`1216 NEXIUM40mg
`1209
`Omeprazole 20 mg
`
`Week4 Week8
`68.7%
`90.6%
`69.5%
`88.3%
`75.9%
`94.1%
`70.5%
`89.9%
`64.7%
`86.9%
`71.5%
`92.2%
`68.6%
`89.8%
`81.7%
`93.7%
`68.7%
`84.2%
`
`p < 0.001
`p < 0.05
`
`N.S.
`
`p < 0.001
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`MYL-EN000523788
`
`Page 7 of 37
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2057
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`NDA 21-153/S-027
`NDA 21-689/S-008
`Page 10
`
`*log-rank test vs omeprazole 20 mg
`N.S. =not significant (p > 0.05).
`
`In these same studies of patients with erosive esophagitis, sustained heartburn resolution and time to
`sustained heartburn resolution were evaluated and are shown in the table below:
`
`Sustained Resolutioni of Heartburn (Erosive Esophagitis Patients)
`
`Cumulative Percent11
`with Sustained
`Resolution
`
`Significance
`Level*
`N.S.
`
`No. of
`Day 14
`Study Patients Treatment Groups
`Day 28
`72.7%
`64.3%
`1
`573
`NEXIUM20mg
`70.9%
`64.1%
`555
`Omeprazole 20 mg
`74.2%
`64.8%
`621
`NEXIUM40mg
`70.1%
`62.9%
`NEXIUM20mg
`620
`66.6%
`56.5%
`626
`Omeprazole 20 mg
`73.9%
`65.4%
`NEXIUM40mg
`568
`73.1%
`65.5%
`551
`Omeprazole 20 mg
`75.1%
`67.6%
`1187 NEXIUM40mg
`70.8%
`62.5%
`1188 Omeprazole 20 mg
`+ Defined as 7 consecutive days with no heartburn reported m dally patient diary.
`#Defined as the cumulative proportion of patients who have reached the start of sustained resolution
`*log-rank test vs omeprazole 20 mg
`N.S. =not significant (p > 0.05).
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`p <0.001
`N.S.
`
`N.S.
`
`p <0.001
`
`In these four studies, the range of median days to the start of sustained resolution (defined as 7
`consecutive days with no heartburn) was 5 days for NEXIUM 40 mg, 7-8 days for NEXIUM 20 mg
`and 7-9 days for omeprazole 20 mg.
`
`There are no comparisons of 40 mg of NEXIUM with 40 mg of omeprazole in clinical trials assessing
`either healing or symptomatic relief of erosive esophagi tis.
`
`Long-Term Maintenance of Healing of Erosive Esophagitis
`Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled 4-arm trials were conducted in patients
`with endoscopically confirmed, healed erosive esophagitis to evaluate NEXIUM 40 mg (n=l 74), 20
`mg (n=l80), 10 mg (n= 168) or placebo (n=l 71) once daily over six months of treatment.
`
`No additional clinical benefit was seen with NEXIUM 40 mg over NEXIUM 20 mg.
`
`The percentage of patients that maintained healing of erosive esophagi tis at the various time points are
`shown in the figures below:
`
`MYL-EN000523789
`
`Page 8 of 37
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2057
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`NDA 21-153/S-027
`NDA 21-689/S-008
`Page 11
`
`Maintenance of Healing Rates by Month (Study 177)
`':: \.< -·: -- ---··- --
`
`........ -·- -·- - - .. - - - - -·- .......
`
`. ...
`
`....
`
`·-..
`
`.. •
`
`... ...
`
`·•·· ·········· ... •······ ······· ...•. ....
`... - ... .. __ _ ·-- .. ......... .. ........ .. ......... .. .. .. .... .. ........ ..
`
`-
`
`NEX IUM 40 mg (N~92)
`NEX IUM 20 mg (N=9B)
`NEX IUM 10 mg (N=9 1)
`- .. • - • Placebo (n=94)
`
`80
`-g 70
`c
`$ 60
`c
`"iii
`~50
`c
`~40
`<J)
`a. 30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0 0
`
`s= scheduled visit
`
`2
`
`3S
`M onth
`
`4
`
`5
`
`Maintenance of Healing Rates by Month (Study 178)
`
`100 •\:--'" _ _ _ ,___,==::-"t:::=::::::-_ -------· .. ---__ -_-_-_-_ -4_ ...... _-_-_-_ -_ -__ ~.,._..__ -
`\ "·
`\ ""
`'"
`\
`"·
`\ .................... ..
`\
`"·
`\
`
`90
`
`80
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`. ..................................... .
`.................
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`\
`\
`\
`\
`\
`\
`\
`\
`
`\ ..__ ----......... _
`--
`
`-+- NEXIUM 40 mg (n~82)
`·-·•-·· NEXIUM 20 mg (n~82)
`..... NEXIUM 10 mg (n~77)
`-+-- Placebo (n~77)
`
`-----....------+------+------+
`
`o ' - - - - - - ' - - - - - ' - - - - - ' - - - - - - ' - - - - - ' - - - - " - - -
`o
`1 s
`3 s
`6 s
`Month
`
`s= scheduled visit
`
`MYL-EN000523790
`
`Page 9 of 37
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2057
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`NDA 21-153/S-027
`NDA 21-689/S-008
`Page 12
`
`Patients remained in rem1ss1on significantly longer and the number of recurrences of erosive
`esophagitis was significantly less in patients treated with NEXIUM compared to placebo.
`
`In both studies, the proportion of patients on NEXIUM who remained in remission and were free of
`heartburn and other GERD symptoms was well differentiated from placebo.
`
`In a third multicenter open label study of 808 patients treated for 12 months with NEXIUM 40 mg, the
`percentage of patients that maintained healing of erosive esophagi tis was 93. 7% for six months and
`89.4% for one year.
`
`Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERO)
`Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted in a total of
`717 patients comparing four weeks of treatment with NEXIUM 20 mg or 40 mg once daily versus
`placebo for resolution of GERD symptoms. Patients had ~ 6-month history of heartburn episodes, no
`erosive esophagitis by endoscopy, and heartburn on at least four of the seven days immediately
`preceding randomization.
`
`The percentage of patients that were symptom-free of heartburn was significantly higher in the
`NEXIUM groups compared to placebo at all follow-up visits (Weeks 1, 2, and 4).
`
`No additional clinical benefit was seen with NEXIUM 40 mg over NEXIUM 20 mg.
`
`The percent of patients symptom-free of heartburn by day are shown in the figures below:
`
`Percent of Patients Symptom-Free of Heartburn by Day
`(Study 225)
`
`100
`
`75
`
`50
`
`25
`
`-
`·-·...tr..- -
`---•--
`
`NEXIUM 40 mg
`NEXIUM 20 mg
`Placebo
`
`.. ____ '
`
`.• .
`
`/" ,•--·-----·
`
`...
`
`- ..
`
`" \
`.....
`
`o'--~~~~--'-~~~~~-'-~~~~~-----~~~~~..._
`0
`14
`28
`21
`Diary Day
`
`MYL-EN000523791
`
`Page 10 of 37
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2057
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`NDA 21-153/S-027
`NDA 21-689/S-008
`Page 13
`
`Percent of Patients Symptom-Free of Heartburn by Day
`(Study 226)
`
`100
`
`-
`
`-·...,-·-
`---•--
`
`NEXIUlv140mg
`NEXIUJ:v120mg
`Placebo
`
`_..,_ __ .... _
`
`. /·--·--· •. -• -----.
`---· .
`
`25
`
`---
`
`&
`;
`
`-..
`·--•,
`. ,..·-------. . '\·---------(cid:173)
`
`.•
`
`·--
`
`·-.
`
`o
`
`o.__~~~~-'-~~~~--"-~~~~~,__~~~~-'--
`14
`21
`28
`Diary Day
`
`In three European symptomatic GERD trials, NEXIUM 20 mg and 40 mg and omeprazole 20 mg were
`evaluated. No significant treatment related differences were seen.
`
`Risk Reduction of NSAID-Associated Gastric Ulcer
`Two multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted in patients at risk of
`developing gastric and/or duodenal ulcers associated with continuous use of non-selective and COX-2
`selective NSAIDs. A total of 1429 patients were randomized across the 2 studies. Patients ranged in
`age from 19 to 89 (median age 66.0 years) with 70.7% female, 29.3% male, 82.9% Caucasian, 5.5%
`Black, 3.7% Asian, and 8.0% Others. At baseline, the patients in these studies were endoscopically
`confirmed not to have ulcers but were determined to be at risk for ulcer occurrence due to their age
`(2:_60 years) and/or history of a documented gastric or duodenal ulcer within the past 5 years. Patients
`receiving NSAIDs and treated with NEXIUM 20 mg or 40 mg once-a-day experienced significant
`reduction in gastric ulcer occurrences relative to placebo treatment at 26 weeks. No additional benefit
`was seen with NEXIUM 40 mg over NEXIUM 20 mg. These studies did not demonstrate significant
`reduction in the development ofNSAID-associated duodenal ulcer due to the low incidence.
`
`Cumulative percentage of patients without gastric ulcers at 26 weeks:
`
`Study
`
`No. of Patients Treatment Group
`
`% of Patients
`Remaining Gastric
`Ulcer Free 1
`
`1
`
`2
`
`191
`194
`184
`
`267
`271
`257
`
`NEXIUM20mg
`NEXIUM40mg
`Placebo
`
`NEXIUM20mg
`NEXIUM40mg
`Placebo
`
`95.4
`96.7
`88.2
`
`94.7
`95.3
`83.3
`
`1 %=Life Table Estimate. Significant difference from placebo (p<0.01).
`
`MYL-EN000523792
`
`Page 11 of 37
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2057
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`NDA 21-153/S-027
`NDA 21-689/S-008
`Page 14
`
`Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) Eradication in Patients with Duodenal Ulcer Disease
`Triple Therapy (NEXIUM/amoxicillin/clarithromycin): Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind
`studies were conducted using a 10 day treatment regimen. The first study (191) compared NEXIUM 40
`mg once daily in combination with amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily and clarithromycin 500 mg twice
`daily to NEXIUM 40 mg once daily plus clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily. The second study (193)
`compared NEXIUM 40 mg once daily in combination with amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily and
`clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily to NEXIUM 40 mg once daily. H. pylori eradication rates, defined
`as at least two negative tests and no positive tests from CLOtest®, histology and/or culture, at 4 weeks
`post-therapy were significantly higher in the NEXIUM plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin group than
`in the NEXIUM plus clarithromycin or NEXIUM alone group. The results are shown in the following
`table:
`
`Study
`191
`
`193
`
`Treatment Group
`NEXIUMplus
`amoxicillin and
`clarithromycin
`NEXIUMplus
`clarithromycin
`
`NEXIUMplus
`amoxicillin and
`clarithromycin
`NEXIUM
`
`H. pylori Eradication Rates at 4 Weeks after 10 Day Treatment Regimen
`% of Patients Cured
`[95% Confidence Interval]
`(Number of patients)
`Intent-to-Treat t
`Per-Protocolt
`77%*
`84%*
`[71, 82]
`[78, 89]
`(n=233)
`(n=l96)
`52%
`55%
`[ 45, 59]
`[48, 62]
`(n=215)
`(n=l87)
`78%**
`85%**
`[67, 87]
`[74, 93]
`(n=74)
`(n=67)
`4%
`5%
`[O, 23]
`[O, 21]
`(n=22)
`(n=24)
`f Patients were included in the analysis if they had H. pylori infection documented at baseline, had at least one endoscopically verified
`duodenal ulcer;:: 0.5 cm in diameter at baseline or had a documented history of duodenal ulcer disease within the past 5 years, and were
`not protocol violators. Patients who dropped out of the study due to an adverse event related to the study drug were included in the
`analysis as not H. pylori eradicated.
`+ Patients were included in the analysis if they had documented H. pylori infection at baseline, had at least one documented duodenal
`ulcer at baseline, or had a documented history of duodenal ulcer disease, and took at least one dose of study medication. All dropouts
`were included as not H. pylori eradicated.
`*p < 0.05 compared to NEXIUM plus clarithromycin
`**p < 0.05 compared to NEXIUM alone
`
`The percentage of patients with a healed baseline duodenal ulcer by 4 weeks after the 10 day treatment
`regimen in the NEXIUM plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin group was 75% (n=l56) and 57% (n=60)
`respectively, in the 191 and 193 studies (per-protocol analysis).
`
`Pathological Hypersecretory Conditions Including Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome
`In a multicenter, open-label dose escalation study of 21 patients (15 males and 6 females, 18 Caucasian
`and 3 Black, mean age of 55.5 years) with pathological hypersecretory conditions, such as Zollinger(cid:173)
`Ellison Syndrome, NEXIUM significantly inhibited gastric acid secretion.
`Initial dose was 40 mg
`twice daily in 19/21 patients and 80 mg twice daily in 2/21 patients. Total daily doses ranging from 80
`mg to 240 mg for 12 months maintained gastric acid output below the target levels of 10 mEq/h in
`
`MYL-EN000523793
`
`Page 12 of 37
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2057
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`NDA 21-153/S-027
`NDA 21-689/S-008
`Page 15
`
`patients without prior gastric acid-reducing surgery and below 5 mEq/hr in patients with prior gastric
`acid-reducing surgery. At the Month 12 final visit, 18/20 (90%) patients had Basal Acid Output
`(BAO) under satisfactory control (median BAO= 0.17 mmol/hr). Of the 18 patients evaluated with a
`starting dose of 40 mg twice daily, 13 (72%) had their BAO controlled with the original dosing
`regimen at the final visit.
`
`Adequate Acid Suppression at final visit by Dose Regimen
`
`NEXIUM dose at the Month 12
`visit
`40 mg twice daily
`80 mg twice daily
`80 mg three times daily
`*One patient was not evaluated.
`
`BAO under adequate control at
`the Month 12 visit (N=20)*
`13/15
`4/4
`1/1
`
`INDICATIONS AND USAGE
`Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERO)
`Healing of Erosive Esophagitis
`NEXIUM is indicated for the short-term treatment (4 to 8 weeks) in the healing and symptomatic
`resolution of diagnostically confirmed erosive esophagitis. For those patients who have not healed after
`4-8 weeks of treatment, an additional 4-8-week course of NEXIUM may be considered.
`
`Maintenance of Healing of Erosive Esophagitis
`NEXIUM is indicated to maintain symptom resolution and healing of erosive esophagitis. Controlled
`studies do not extend beyond 6 months.
`
`Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
`NEXIUM is indicated for treatment of heartburn and other symptoms associated with GERD.
`
`Risk Reduction of NSAID-Associated Gastric Ulcer
`NEXIUM is indicated for the reduction in the occurrence of gastric ulcers associated with continuous
`NSAID therapy in patients at risk for developing gastric ulcers. Patients are considered to be at risk
`due to their age (::::_ 60) and/or documented history of gastric ulcers. Controlled studies do not extend
`beyond 6 months.
`
`H. pylori Eradication to Reduce the Risk of Duodenal Ulcer Recurrence
`Triple Therapy (NEXIUM plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin): NEXIUM, in combination with
`amoxicillin and clarithromycin, is indicated for the treatment of patients with H. pylori infection and
`duodenal ulcer disease (active or history of within the past 5 years) to eradicate H. pylori. Eradication
`of H. pylori has been shown to reduce the risk of duodenal ulcer recurrence. (See Clinical Studies and
`DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRAT

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket