throbber
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1994; 8 (Suppl. 1): 65-70.
`
`Safety of proton pump inhibitors-an overview
`
`R.ARNOLD
`Department of Internal Medicine. Division of Gastroenterology and Metabolism. Philipps University. Marburg. Germany
`
`SUMMARY
`
`Drug-induced achlorhydria in experimental animals
`results in excessive hypergastrinaemia. ECL-cell
`hyperplasia and ECL-cell carcinoidosis. However. these
`events have not been observed in long-term studies in
`patients receiving proton pump inhibitors. Serum
`gastrin levels increase only modestly during acute and
`long-term treatment. It is concluded that monitoring of
`serum gastrin levels and of fundic ECL cells is of no
`clinical relevance even during long-term therapy with
`proton pump inhibitors. The clinically available proton
`pump inhibitors such as pantoprazole. omeprazole and
`lansoprazole are well tolerated. with a low incidence of
`side-effects. Minor and serious side-effects classified as
`possibly related to proton pump therapy have been
`described in up to 2.5% of patients. This is the same
`
`order of magnitude as that found in patients treated
`with H2-receptor blockers and in placebo-treated
`controls. In most cases. therefore. the observed side(cid:173)
`effects are unrelated to the intake of proton pump
`inhibitors. Minor adverse events include headache.
`diarrhoea. dizziness. pruritus and rash. Proton pump
`inhibitors are metabolized mainly in the liver via the
`cytochrome P450 system and interactions with drugs
`metabolized by the same system are possible. Evidence
`is becoming available which suggests that pantoprazole
`may have less potential to interact with the
`cytochrome P450 system than the other proton pump
`inhibitors. In the case of diazepam metabolism.
`pantoprazole had the least effect on prolongation of the
`diazepam effect. This may well be an advantage in the
`clinical use of the drug.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Over the past 15 years. major advances have been made
`in the therapeutic control of acid secretion. The advent of
`H2-receptor antagonists provided an effective class of
`drugs. and their widespread use has brought relief to
`millions of patients without significant side-effects. 1
`4
`-
`Earlier in this symposium. Professor Sachs described the
`limitations of the H2-receptor antagonists and provided a
`biological basis for the therapeutic control of acid
`secretion by an entirely new class of anti secretory drugs.
`the substituted benzimidazoles. which act as inhibitors of
`gastric H+,K+-ATPase. the gastric acid pump.5 Many
`investigators have demonstrated advantages of proton
`pump inhibitors in the treatment of peptic ulcers resistant
`to high doses of H2-receptor antagonists. 6
`10
`-
`
`Correspondence to: Professor R. Arnold. Department of Internal Medicine.
`Division of Gastroenterology and Metabolism. Philipps University. Balding(cid:173)
`erstrasse. D-35033 Marburg/L .. Germany.
`
`The safety and long-term use of proton pump inhibitors
`have been discussed extensively in this symposium. This
`paper will provide an overview of the current overall
`safety data available. First of all. it is important to begin
`with the gastrin hypothesis and its relation to therapy
`with proton pump inhibitors.
`
`The gastrin hypothesis
`
`The gastrin hypothesis implies that hypergastrinaemia
`can arise. either because of the Zollinger-Ellison syn(cid:173)
`drome. or via achlorhydria. The state of achlorhydria can
`be achieved by pharmacological induction in animals or
`by atrophic gastritis. for instance. in the case of pernicious
`anaemia in humans. Achlorhydria leads to hyper(cid:173)
`gastrinaemia. which then exerts a trophic effect leading
`to enterochromaffin-like (ECL)-cell hyperplasia. l l In his
`paper. Professor Sachs also described the presence of a
`receptor on the ECL cells for progastrin5 and it follows
`
`65
`
`Page 1 of 6
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2040
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`66 R. ARNOLD
`
`that ECL-cell hyperplasia is the physiological or patho(cid:173)
`physiological consequence of every case of hyper(cid:173)
`gastrinaemia. whether or not
`it arises from
`the
`Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. pernicious anaemia or fol(cid:173)
`lowing pharmacological induction. However. ECL-cell
`hyperplasia does not necessarily lead to the appearance
`of either ECL-cell dysplasia or ECL-cell carcinoidosis.
`There may be important cofactors involved which have
`still to be identified. For example. in humans. carcinoids
`have only been observed in patients with pernicious
`anaemia and gastrin om a patients associated with the
`Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia (MEN) I synclrome.12. 13 In
`contrast. patients with sporadic gastrinoma do not
`develop carcinoid tumours.13 This indicates that the
`presence of atrophic gastritis (pernicious anaemia) or of a
`genetic trait (MEN I syndrome) could be such cofactors.
`When rats were treated experimentally with BY308 (a
`predecessor of pantoprazole). there was a marked rise in
`serum gastrin levels paralleled by a rise in the number of
`ECL cells. compared with control values (Figure 1 ).14
`Measurement of the ECL-ceillabelling index reveals the
`extent of cells which are dividing. Figure 2 shows the
`dividing capacity of ECL cells in rats under the influence
`of BY308. It can be seen that in contrast to control
`values. the ECL-cell labelling index increased rapidly
`within 10 days of treatment after which time a plateau
`occurred through to 70 days. This corresponds with the
`linear increase in ECL cell numbers over this 70-day
`period. (Figure 2 ).14
`When the experiments were repeated with BY308 in
`rats in the presence of a specific gastrin receptor
`antagonist. it was possible to reverse the increases both
`in the number of ECL cells and in the ECL-cell labelling
`index despite persisting hypergastrinaemia. This normal(cid:173)
`ization of the ECL-ceillabelling index demonstrated that
`the ECL-cell hyperplasia observed was gastrin-medi(cid:173)
`ated. 15
`
`Types of ECL-cell hyperplasia
`
`Several types of ECL-cell hyperplasia have been identified.
`namely diffuse. linear and micronodular.16 Linear and
`diffuse ECL-cell hyperplasia is often observed in patients
`with duodenal and gastric ulcer disease in which H.
`pylori-associated gastritis ofthe antral and fundic mucosa
`is a common finding. Changes in ECL-cell morphology in
`these patients seem to be independent of the mode of
`treatment (H2-blockers. proton pump inhibitors) as simi(cid:173)
`lar events have been described even in untreated
`
`2400
`
`E 1800
`" '" .2:
`
`1200
`
`600
`
`0
`
`600
`
`400
`
`Qj
`>
`~
`
`" E
`.,
`0 '" E
`
`:::>
`0;
`(J)
`
`1:
`E
`"
`~ .,
`D
`E
`:::> " Qj
`
`o
`~ 200
`u
`w
`
`0
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`
`50
`
`60
`
`70
`
`~
`
`Time (days)
`
`- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - -..
`
`Control
`
`-
`
`-
`
`- - - - -
`
`o
`
`~~ _ _ _L _ _ _L _ _ J _ _ _ L_~ _ _ -L __ ~
`10
`20
`30
`40
`50
`60
`70
`
`o
`
`Time (days)
`
`Figure 1. Serum gastrin levels and number of ECL-cells in rats
`treated with BY308. and untreated controls (data from Eissele et
`a/l.14
`
`5
`
`)(
`
`~
`~
`:E 4
`Q)
`u
`-.J 3
`0 w
`Q) 2
`'0
`.S:
`O'l c
`ai
`..0
`
`S 0
`
`Control
`
`0
`
`10
`
`20 30 40 50 60 70
`Time (days)
`
`Figure 2. Percentage labelling index of ECL cells in rats treated
`with BY308. and untreated controls (data from Eissele et a/).14
`
`Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1994. vo!' 8 (Supp!. 1).
`
`Page 2 of 6
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2040
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`SAFETY OF PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS
`
`67
`
`e------e Vagotomy
`___ Omeprazole 20 mg om
`0--0 Pre-treatment
`
`...J
`
`120
`
`"-a
`E
`E 100
`
`.s
`
`80
`
`." g 60
`o ." 10 .,
`'" E
`
`40
`
`.~
`c
`.!!
`."
`Q)
`::;:
`
`20
`
`09.00
`
`12.00
`
`15.00
`
`18.00
`
`21.00
`
`24.00
`
`03,00
`
`06.00
`
`09.00
`
`Ti me (24 - hour clock)
`
`Figure 3. 24-hour intragastric acidity in
`duodenal ulcer patients. treated with
`omeprazole during or after selective
`proximal vagotomy (data from Lind et
`al)."o
`
`19 Micronodular ECL-cell hyperplasia can also
`patients. 16
`-
`be observed in patients with atrophic gastritis due to
`pernicious anaemia. resulting from atrophy of the glands
`where parietal cells are destroyed. 12, 16 From these
`observations it has been concluded that there is a
`correlation between the grade of gastritis and the
`development of linear. diffuse and micronodular ECL-cell
`hyperplasia.
`
`Serum gastrin and EeL cells in patients treated with proton
`pump inhibitors
`
`In contrast to patients with permclOUS anaemia and
`Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. only moderate increases in
`serum gastrin levels have been observed during acute
`and long-term treatment with either the proton pump
`inhibitor. omeprazole. or with ranitidine. 17
`,19 These
`
`Table 1. Side-effects in patients receiving
`pantoprazole. ranitidine or omeprazole
`
`Description
`
`Controls
`(n=20)
`
`Zollinger(cid:173)
`Ellison
`Syndrome
`(n= 13)
`Figure 4. Median EeL-cell number in various conditions (data
`from Arnold et al.).19
`
`Pernicious
`anaemia
`(n=8)
`
`3 years
`2 year~
`Omeprazole Omeprazole
`(n=16)
`(n=8)
`
`moderate increases mirror the levels in serum gastrin
`obtained during or after selective proximal vagotomy
`(SPV) (Figure 3).20 Selective proximal vagotomy has been
`
`Pantoprazole
`
`Ranitidine
`
`Omeprazole
`
`Oedema
`Vasodilation
`Peripheral vascular disorder
`Tremor
`Taste perversion
`Sleep disorder
`Bilirubinaemia
`Arthritis
`Chills
`Exfoliative dermatitis
`Depression
`Anorexia
`Apathy
`
`0
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`1
`0
`0
`0
`
`1
`0
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`0
`1
`0
`1
`1
`1
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1994, vol. 8 (Suppl. 1).
`
`Page 3 of 6
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2040
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`68
`
`R. ARNOLD
`
`Table 2. Frequency of adverse events (percentages in parentheses) for patients receiving pantoprazole (20, 40 or 80 mg), ranitidine
`(300 mg) or omeprazole (20 mg)
`
`Parameter
`
`Episodes
`Patients with episodes
`All episodes
`Serious episodes
`Patients treated
`
`Pantoprazole
`20mg
`
`Pantoprazole
`40mg
`
`Pantoprazole
`80mg
`
`6
`
`180
`
`23
`
`Ranitidine
`300mg
`
`114
`
`Omeprazole
`20mg
`
`20
`
`6 (7.0%)
`1 (1.2%)
`86
`
`170 (lO.6%)
`17(1.1%)
`16lO
`
`21 (15.2%)
`0(0.0%)
`138
`
`105 (12.3%)
`9 (1.1 %)
`854
`
`19 (11.0%)
`3 (1.7%)
`173
`
`proven as safe for more than 30 years. In a recent
`publication we described the EeL cell density in patients
`several years after Spy, and the results showed that there
`was a modest increase in EeL cell density. similar to that
`observed after proton pump treatment. 21
`Treatment with omeprazole for up to 6 years induces
`only a modest increase in the EeL cell density. which is
`much lower than that observed in patients with
`Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or with pernicious anaemia
`(Figure 4).17.19 A doubling of the mean argyrophil cell
`volume density was paralleled by a decrease in the
`normal endocrine cell growth pattern 17 and an increase
`in micronodular hyperplasia.17 These changes correlate
`with the severity of corpus gastritis and seem to be more
`than drug-related.17 Similarly. only modest
`disease-
`increases in serum gastrin levels are observed in humans
`with pantoprazole. increases which are not clinically
`significant.22 From the present studies it can be concluded
`that the monitoring of serum gastrin levels and of the EeL
`cell numbers in fundic biopsies in patients treated with
`proton pump inhibitors is of no clinical relevance. even
`during the longer term.
`
`Safety of proton pump inhibitors
`
`There are numerous studies on the side-effects of proton
`pump inhibitors which demonstrate that proton pump
`inhibitors are as safe as H2-receptor antagonists. Most
`studies compared the safety of omeprazole in comparison
`with the H2-blockers cimetidine and ranitidine. 23,24
`Studies involving almost 3500 patients with peptic ulcer
`and reflux oesophagitis indicated that the incidence of
`, the major side-effects in the short term. such as headache.
`diarrhoea. abdominal pain. fatigue and flatulence. was
`very similar following treatment with either drug. Ome(cid:173)
`prazole had no clinically relevant effects on laboratory
`variables
`including: haematology;
`liver
`function;
`
`electrolytes; renal function; thyroid hormones; blood
`pressure; heart rate; EeG. Available data indicate that
`pantoprazole is similarly well tolerated in humans.25-28
`There is. in addition. ample evidence that the pattern
`and frequency of adverse events following omeprazole
`therapy did not increase. even during long-term treat(cid:173)
`ment. 29,30 In this symposium. Dr Schepp has presented
`comparative data of side-effects in patients receiving
`pantoprazole. ranitidine or omeprazole and observed
`very little differences between them (Table 1).31
`Similarly. Table 2 shows percentages of all episodes. and
`of serious episodes. of adverse events in patients receiving
`pantoprazole (20. 40 or 80 mg/day). ranitidine (300
`mg/day) or omeprazole (20 mg/day) for 4-8 weeks.
`There was little difference between the three drugs in
`terms of the frequency of serious episodes.
`
`Interactions with pharmaceutical compounds
`
`Proton pump inhibitors are metabolized mainly in the
`liver via the cytochrome P450 system and it is possible
`that interactions could occur with other drugs metabol(cid:173)
`ized by the same system. Interactions of omeprazole with
`phenytoin. warfarin. diazepam. digoxin and nifedipine
`have been described. some of which could possibly
`achieve clinical significance. Pantoprazole has a much
`lower potential than omeprazole for interaction with the
`cytochrome P450 system and is likely to exhibit fewer
`interactions with any of the above-mentioned drugs. 32,33
`Indeed. it has been shown in rats that pantoprazole
`interacts less with the metabolism of diazepam and
`theophylline in comparison with either of the other two
`proton pump inhibitors or with cimetidine.32, 34 Fur(cid:173)
`thermore. clinical studies with pantoprazole have demon(cid:173)
`strated no interaction with diazepam.35
`
`Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1994, vo!' 8 (Supp!. I),
`
`Page 4 of 6
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2040
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`CONCLUSIONS
`
`The clinically available proton pump inhibitors. panto(cid:173)
`prazole. omeprazole and lansoprazole. are well tolerated.
`This holds true for overall safety. unwanted effects with
`drug-metabolizing enzymes and the consequences of the
`gastrin hypothesis. With proton pump inhibitors. there is
`a low incidence of side-effects. Minor and serious side(cid:173)
`effects. classified as possibly related to proton pump
`therapy. he.ve been described in up to 2.5 % of patients.
`which is the same order of magnitude as that found in
`patients treated with H2-receptor blockers and in placebo(cid:173)
`treated controls. In most cases. the observed side-effects
`are unrelated to the intake of proton pump inhibitors.
`Moreover. clinical monitoring of serum gastrin levels is
`deemed unnecessary. With this overall good safety
`profile. the proton pump inhibitors represent a very
`useful treatment for the management of peptic ulcers and
`other acid-related diseases.
`Proton pump inhibitors are metabolized mainly in the
`liver via the cytochrome P450 system. and interactions
`with drugs metabolized by the same system are possible.
`It appears that pantoprazole has considerably less po(cid:173)
`tential to interact with the cytochrome P450 system
`than the other proton pump inhibitors and. in the case of
`diazepam metabolism. pantoprazole in rats had the least
`effect on prolongation of the diazepam effect. In clinical
`use this may well be an advantage of the drug.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1 Arcidiacono R. Benvestito V, Bonomo GM. et al. Comparison
`between ranitidine 150 mg b.d. and ranitidine 300 mg nocte
`in the treatment of duodenal ulcer. Int J Pharmacol Ther
`Toxicol1986: 24: 381-4.
`2 Alcala Santaella R, Guardia J, Pajares J, et al. A multicentre,
`randomized. double blind study comparing nocte famotidine or
`ranitidine for the treatment of active duodenal ulceration.
`Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1989: 3: 103-10.
`3 Bank S, Greenberg RE, Magier D, et al. The efficacy and
`tolerability of famotidine and ranitidine on the healing of active
`duodenal ulcer and during six-month maintenance treatment
`with special reference to NSAID aspirin-related ulcers. Clin
`Ther 1991: 13: 204-11.
`4 Lee FJ. Reed PI. Crowe JP, et al. Acute treatment of duodenal
`ulcer: a multicentre study to compare ranitidine 150 mg twice
`daily with ranitidine 300 mg once at night. Gut 1986: 27:
`1091-5.
`5 Shin J M. Besancon M, Prinz C. Simon A. Sachs G. Continuing
`development of acid pump inhibitors: site of action of pan to-
`
`Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1994. vol. 8 (Suppl. 1).
`
`SAFETY OF PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS
`
`69
`
`prazole. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1994: 8 (Suppl. 1):
`11-23.
`6 Lundell L, Backman I. Ekstrom p, et al. Omeprazole or high-dose
`ranitidine in the treatment of patients with reflux oesophagitis
`not responding to 'standard doses' of H2-receptor antagonists.
`Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1990: 4: 145-55.
`7 Tytgat GNJ, Lamers CBHW, Hameeteman W, et al. Omeprazole
`in peptic ulcers resistant to histamine H2-receptor antagonists.
`Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1987: 1: 31-8.
`8 Brunner G, Arnold R, Hennig U, Fuchs W. An open trial of
`long-term therapy with lansoprazole in patients with peptic
`ulceration resistant to extended high-dose ranitidine treatment.
`Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1993: 7 (Suppl. 1): 51-5.
`9 Walan A, Bader JP, Classen M, et al. Effect of omeprazole and
`ranitidine on ulcer healing and relapse rates in patients with
`benign gastric ulcer. N Engl J Med 1989: 320: 69-75.
`10 Brunner G, Creutzfeldt W, Harke U, Lamberts S. Therapy with
`omeprazole in patients with peptic ulcerations resistant to
`extended high-dose ranitidine treatment. Digestion 1988: 38:
`80-90.
`11 Larsson H, Carlsson E, Hakonson R, et al. Time-course of
`development and reversal of gastric endocrine cell hyperplasia
`after inhibition of acid secretion. Gastroenterology 1988: 95:
`1477-86.
`12 Borch K, Renvall H, Kullman E, Wilander E. Gastric carcinoid
`associated with the syndrome of hypergastrinemic atrophic
`gastritis. Am J Surg Pathol 1987: 11: 435-44.
`13 Solcia E, Capella C, Fiocca R, Rindi G, Rosai J. Gastric argyrophil
`carcinoidosis in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome due
`to type 1 multiple endocrine neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol
`1990: 14: 503-13.
`14 Eissele R, Rosskopf B, Koop H, et al. Proliferation of endocrine
`cells, in the rat stomach caused by drug-induced achlorhydria.
`Gastroenterology 1991: 101: 71-6.
`15 Eissele R, Patberg H, Koop H, et al. Effect of gastrin receptor
`blockade on endocrine cells, in rats during achlorhydria.
`Gastroenterology 1992: 103: 1596-601.
`16 Solcia E, Bordi L, Creutzfeldt W, et al. Histopathological
`classification of nonantral gastric endocrine growths in man.
`Digestion 1988: 41: 185-200.
`17 Lamberts R, Creutzfeldt W, Striiben HG, et al. Long-term
`omeprazole therapy in peptic ulcer disease: gastrin, endocrine
`cell growth, and gastritis. Gastroenterology 1993; 104:
`1350-70.
`18 Solcia E, Fiocca R, Havu N, et al. Gastric endocrine cells and
`gastritis in patients receiving long-term omeprazole treatment.
`Digestion 1992; 51: 82-92.
`19 Arnold R, Frank M, Simon B, et al. Adaptation and renewal of
`the endocrine stomach. Scand J Gastroenterology 1992; 27
`(Suppl. 193): 20-7.
`20 Lind T, Cederberg L, Olausson M, Olbe L. 24 hour intragastric
`acidity and plasma gastrin after omeprazole treatment and
`after proximal gastric vagotomy in duodenal ulcer patients.
`Gastroenterology 1990; 99: 1593-8.
`21 Koop H, Frank M, Kuly S. et al. Gastric argyrophil (entero(cid:173)
`chromaffin-like), gastrin, and somatostatis cell, after proximal
`selective vagotomy in men. Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38: 295-302.
`
`Page 5 of 6
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2040
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`70 R. ARNOLD
`
`22 Miiller p, Simon B, Khalil H, Liihmann R, Leucht U, Schneider
`A. Dose-range study with the proton pump inhibitor panto(cid:173)
`prazole in acute duodenal ulcer patients. Gastroenterology
`1992; 30: 771-5.
`23 Sandmark A, Carlsson R, Fansa 0, et al. Omeprazole or
`ranitidine in the treatment of reflux esophagitis. The results of
`a double-blind, randomised, Scandinavian, multicenter study.
`Scand J Gastroenterol1988; 23: 625-32.
`24 Massooni F, Savage HIJ, Destache C, et al. Omeprazole: a
`comprehensive review. Pharmacol Ther 1993; 13: 46-59.
`25 Schepp W, Classen M. Pantoprazole vs. ranitidine in the
`treatment of acute duodenal ulcer-German Multicenter
`Study. Gastroenterology 1993; 104: A 186 (Abstract).
`26 Koelz HR, Judmaier G. Double-blind comparison of pan to(cid:173)
`prazole and ranitidine in short-term treatment of acute
`duodenal ulcer. Gastroenterology 1993; 104: A 121 (Ab(cid:173)
`stract).
`27 Miiller p, Simon B. Treatment of acute duodenal ulcer with
`pantoprazule: a dose-finding study. Gastroenterology 1993;
`104: A 151 (Abstract).
`28 Koop H, Classen M, Schepp W, Dammann HG. Comparison of
`pantoprazole and ranitidine in reflux esophagitis: German
`Multicenter Study. Gastroenterology 1993; 104: A 123
`(Abstract).
`29 Lloyd-Davis KA, Rutgersson K. Salvell L. Omeprazole in the
`
`treatment of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: a 4 year international
`study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1988; 2: 13-32.
`30 Maton PM, Vinayek R, Frucht H, et al. Long-term efficacy and
`safety of omeprazole in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syn(cid:173)
`drome: a prospective study. Gastroenterology 1989: 97:
`827-36.
`31 Schepp W. Treatment of duodenal and gastric ulcers, pan to(cid:173)
`prazole vs. omeprazole. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1994: 8
`(Supp!. 1): 53-7.
`32 Hanauer G, Graf U, Meissuer T. In vivo cytochrome P450
`interaction of the newly developed W,K+-ATPase inhibitor
`pantoprazole (BY1023jSKF96022) compared to other anti(cid:173)
`ulcer drugs. Meth Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 1991; 13: 63-7.
`33 Kromer W, Postius S, Reidel R, et al. BY1023jSKF96022 INN
`pantoprazole, a novel gastric proton pump inhibitor, potently
`inhibits acid secretion but lacks relevant cytochrome P450
`interactions. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1990; 254: 129-35.
`34 Schulz H-U, Hartmann M, Steinijaus VW, et al. Lack of
`influence of pantoprazole on the disposition kinetics of theo(cid:173)
`phylline in man. IntI Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol1991 ; 29:
`369-75.
`35 Gugler R, Hartmann M, Rudi J, et al. Lack of interaction of
`pantoprazole and diazepam in man. Gastroenterology 1992:
`102: A77 (Abstract).
`
`Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1994, vo!' 8 (Supp!. 1).
`
`Page 6 of 6
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2040
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket