throbber
YALE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 69 (1996), pp. 203-209.
`Copyright © 1997. All rights reserved.
`
`Interaction of Proton Pump Inhibitors with Cytochromes P450:
`Consequences for Drug Interactions
`Urs A. Meyera
`Department ofPharmacology, Biozentrum of the University ofBasel, Basel, Switzerland
`(Received March 8, 1996; accepted May 15, 1996)
`
`Omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole are metabolized by several human
`cytochromes P450, most prominently by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. Only panto-
`prazole is also metabolized by a sulfotransferase. Differences in the quantitative
`contribution of these enzymes and in the relative affinities of the substrates
`explain some of the observed interactions with carbamazepin, diazepam, pheny-
`toin and theophylline and of the impact of the CYP2C19 (mephenytoin) genet-
`ic polymorphism. Of these drugs, pantoprazole has the lowest potential for
`interactions, both in vitro and in human volunteer studies.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`The proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)b omeprazole, pantoprazole and lansoprazole are
`substituted benzimidazole sulfoxides with similar dose-efficacy profiles. Elimination of
`these drugs occurs almost entirely by rapid metabolism to inactive or less active metabo-
`lites, so that virtually no unchanged drug is excreted in urine and feces. The clearances of
`PPIs are between 0.1 and 0.5 1/h/kg-body-weight and the plasma half-lives range from 0.3
`to 2.2 hr [1-4]. Drug metabolism is subject to genetic and environmental variation, which
`is a frequent cause of patient-to-patient differences in drug effects. The differences in the
`metabolism of these drugs, therefore, may favorably or unfavorably affect the potential for
`interactions, enzyme induction and genetically polymorphic metabolism. On the other
`hand, it is well known that the inhibitory effect of these drugs on acid secretion persists
`for a long time, in spite of their rapid elimination.
`METABOLISM OF OMEPRAZOLE, LANSOPRAZOLE AND PANTOPRAZOLE
`Omeprazole
`Omeprazole remains the most extensively studied of the PPIs in regard to its metab-
`olism (Figure 1) [5, 6]. Omeprazole is primarily metabolized by aliphatic hydroxylation
`of the pyridinyl methyl group to hydroxy-omeprazole and by oxidation of the sulfoxide
`group to form omeprazole sulfone. Both metabolites are further metabolized to the
`hydroxysulfone. In vitro studies in human liver mircrosomes have also revealed some par-
`ticipation of CYP2C19, CYP3A and CYP2D6 in the formation of secondary and minor
`metabolites [6]. Two well-known cytochromes P450, CYP2C19 (S-mephenytoin hydrox-
`ylase) and CYP3A4 (nifedipine oxidase), catalyze these reactions. CYP2C19 exhibits a
`significant genetic polymorphism, and poor metabolizers of S-mephenytoin are also poor
`metabolizers of omeprazole [7-10] (see below).
`
`aTo whom all correspondence should be sent: Urs A. Meyer, Department of Pharmacology,
`Biozentrum of the University of Basel, Klingelbergstr. 70, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
`Tel: 41-61-267-22-20; Fax: 41-61-267-22-08; E-mail: meyer2@ubaclu.unibas.ch.
`bAbbreviations: PPI, proton pump inhibitor; PM, poor metabolizer; EM, extensive metabolizer.
`
`203
`
`Page 1 of 7
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2037
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`204
`
`Meyer:
`
`Metabolism ofproton pump inhibitors
`
`OMEPRAZOLE
`
`OCH3
`
`ICYP2C1 9
`
`HOH2C -
`Hydroxyomeprazole
`
`I CYP3A4>\
`
`0
`- S-and-S-
`11
`0
`Omeprazole sulfone
`and - sulfide
`CYP2C19 |
`I
`
`Omeprazole hydroxysulfone
`Figure 1. Major metabolic pathways of omeprazole and the enzymes involved. The size of the
`arrows approximates the overall importance of the pathway for elimination.
`
`LANSOPRAZOLE
`
`OCH2 CF3
`
`CYP2C[ 9?
`CYP3A4? 1
`
`-OH
`Hydroxylansoprazole
`
`(
`
`ICYP3A41
`
`01
`
`1
`- S-and-S-
`I'
`0
`Sulfite
`© Sulfone
`Figure 2. Major metabolic pathways of lansoprazole.
`
`Page 2 of 7
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2037
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`Meyer:
`
`Metabolism ofproton pump inhibitors
`
`205
`
`PANTOPRAZOLE
`
`,OCF2 H
`
`0
`-S-and-S-
`11
`0
`Sulfone
`
`Sulfide
`
`-OH
`Hydroxypantoprazole
`Sulfotransferase
`
`OSO3H (M2)
`Pantoprazole sulfate
`ICYP3A4?I \
`
`01
`
`1
`-S-and-S-
`11
`0
`(M3)
`(Ml)
`Figure 3. Major metabolic pathways of pantoprazole. Ml, M2 and M3 are the major metabolites
`detected in serum.
`
`Lansoprazole
`The major metabolic pathway of lansoprazole involves the formation of lansoprazole
`sulfone from the sulfoxide group (Figure 2). Lansoprazole sulfone is also the main
`metabolite present in serum. Hydroxylansoprazole is also formed, but the hydroxylation
`occurs at a different position (carbon 5 of the benzimidazole moiety) than for omeprazol
`(5-methyl carbon of the pyridinyl group). Studies with human liver microsomes and
`human hepatocytes in culture [1] indicate that, as with omeprazole, CYP3A4 is the major
`enzyme involved in the sulfone formation. However, the enzymes catalyzing the hydrox-
`ylation are less clearly identified and contributions of the cytochromes CYP3A4,
`CYP2C 18, CYP2C19 and others are suspected [ 1].
`Pantoprazole
`Pantoprazole (Figure 3) is also completely metabolized in the liver. It undergoes 0-
`demethylation by CYP2C19, which is followed by sulfate conjugation and some sulfone
`or sulfide formation, either by oxidation or reduction of the sulfoxide group [3, 4]. Recent
`in vivo and in vitro studies in human liver microsomes suggest that in addition to a cytoso-
`lic sulfotransferase, CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 affect the clearance of pantoprazole, i.e.,
`poor metabolizers of pantoprazole were also poor metabolizers of mephenytoin (Table 1,
`W.A. Simon, unpublished data). The same studies suggest that additional enzymes such
`
`Page 3 of 7
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2037
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`206
`
`Meyer:
`
`Metabolism ofproton pump inhibitors
`
`as CYP2C9 and CYP2D6 may contribute in a minor way to some of the reactions involved
`in the metabolism of pantoprazole.
`In summary, CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 (and in the case of pantoprazole a sulfotrans-
`ferase) are sequentially and alternatively involved in the metabolism of these drugs.
`However, the affinities of these enzymes for the different substrates and metabolites
`apparently vary remarkably. CYP2C 19 and CYP3A4 are well-studied human drug-metab-
`olizing enzymes and their substrates, inhibitors and inducers have been extensively
`reviewed [12, 131.
`ROLE OF THE CYP2C19 POLYMORPHISM FOR THE KINETICS OF PPI'S
`CYP2C19 or S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase manifests a common genetic polymor-
`phism [14]. Two mutations, ml and m2, of the CYP2C19 gene have recently been demon-
`strated to cause loss of function alleles of this enzyme [15, 16]. Homozygous carriers of
`the mutation, thus, completely lack CYP2C19 enzyme and are so-called poor metaboliz-
`ers (PMs) of mephenytoin. These PMs have an up to 10-fold higher value of the area under
`the plasma concentration-time curve of omeprazole [7, 8, 17-19] as compared to extensive
`metabolizers. 2.5 to 6 percent of Caucasians and up to 30 percent of Oriental individuals
`are PMs [20]. During treatment with 40 mg/d omeprazole, approximately 80 percent of
`omeprazole clearance can be attributed to CYP2C19. When the dose is increased,
`CYP2C19 becomes limiting, and non-linear saturation kinetics may occur. Thus, at high
`doses, the kinetic parameter in EMs is shifted toward values observed in PMs who do not
`have a CYP2C19 enzyme. For omeprazole, at least, CYP3A4 appears to function as a
`high-capacity enzyme and prevents accumulation of very high omeprazole concentrations.
`Under these condition, CYP3A4 may become the major target of drug interaction. Similar
`studies have not been done for lansoprazole and pantoprazole, but as already discussed,
`CYP2C19 also plays a role in the metabolism of these drugs. PMs of mephenytoin were
`also PMs of pantoprazole (Table 1), and lansoprazole was shown in in vitro studies to be
`in part metabolized by CYP2C19.
`The relevance of the polymorphism for the efficacy and safety of acid inhibitory ther-
`apy by PPI's has not been evaluated. Chang et al. [18] reported higher gastrin levels in
`PMs after eight daily doses (20 mg) of omeprazole in PMs as compared to EMs, but no
`studies on acid secretion are yet available. This would be of particular importance in pop-
`ulations with a high percentage of PMs of mephenytoin. Moreover, gastrin levels were
`also higher in heterozygous carriers of a mutant alleles of CYP2C19. This finding sug-
`gests that approximately 60 percent of Orientals (including the homozygous and het-
`erozygous carriers of CYP2C19 mutant alleles) may have a slower metabolism of
`CYP2C 19 substrates than the majority of Caucasians.
`INDUCTION OF DRUG-METABOLISM BY PPI'S
`Omeprazole and lansoprazole induce the synthesis of CYPlAl and CYP1A2 [21].
`For omeprazole, induction of CYPlA enzymes has been demonstrated in biopsies of
`
`Table 1. Plasma half lives (h + S.D.) of omeprazole and pantoprazole in extensive
`metabolizers and poor metabolizers of mephenytoin. The phenotype for S-mepheny-
`toin hydroxylation was determined by the urinary S/R enantiomeric ratio.
`Omeprazole*
`Pantoprazole**
`0.69 + 0.41 (6)t
`Extensive metabolizers
`1.3 + 0.9 (11)
`2.30 + 0.44 (6)
`Poor metabolizers
`7.6 + 1.1 (4) (range 6.2-9)
`*Data from [8]. **Data from Byk Gulden, Konstanz, Germany. tNumber of volunteers.
`
`Page 4 of 7
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2037
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`Meyer:
`
`Metabolism ofproton pump inhibitors
`
`207
`
`human liver [21] and gut [22]. This effect has also been demonstrated in vivo in human
`volunteers by increased N3-demethylation of caffeine after omeprazole administration
`[24, 25] or increased clearance of theophylline after lansoprazole treatment [26]. In
`human hepatocyte cultures [27], CYP3A4 also was induced by omeprazole and its sul-
`fone, and by lansoprazole. The induction effect is concentration-dependent and, thus,
`occurs at lower doses in poor metabolizers of mephenytoin. The molecular mechanism of
`the induction of CYPIA1/2 and CYP3A4 by these drugs is not exactly known [28, 29].
`These observations have generated a debate on the risk of induced P450s for carcinogen-
`esis, since both CYPlAl and CYP3A4 can activate or inactivate procarcinogens. For
`some procarcinogens, induction can be an advantage, for others a disadvantage. Lack of
`induction of antipyrine, caffeine and theophylline clearance by pantoprazole suggests that
`this drug has little or no potential for induction [30, 31].
`DRUG INTERACTIONS
`PPIs interact with cytochromes P450 not only as substrates, but also as competitive
`inhibitors and inducers. Omeprazole inhibits the clearance of diazepam by 26 to 54 per-
`cent [32, 33], and this inhibition is more apparent in individuals of the mephenytoin exten-
`sive metabolizer phenotype (EMs), indicating that at therapeutic concentrations omepra-
`zole and diazepam compete for the same site on CYP2C19. Neither lansoprazole [34] nor
`pantoprazole [35] seem to affect diazepam kinetics. A decrease in the clearance of pheny-
`toin [36] and carbamazepin [37] points to interaction of omeprazole with other
`cytochromes P450, presumably of the CYP2C9 subfamily. Lansoprazole and pantoprazole
`
`Table 2. Interactions of PPIs with other drugs.
`
`Drug tested
`
`Theophylline
`Caffeine
`
`Phenytoin
`Warfarin
`Carbamazepin
`Diclofenac
`Phenprocoumon
`
`Mephenytoin
`Diazepam
`
`Debrisoquine
`Propanalol
`Metoprolol
`
`Nifedipin
`Cyclosporine
`Lidocaine
`Quinidine
`Contraceptives
`
`Major P450
`
`Omeprazole
`
`CYP1A2
`CYPlA2
`
`CYP2C9
`CYP2C9
`CYP2C8
`CYP2C9
`?
`
`CYP2C19
`CYP2Cl9
`
`CYP2D6
`CYP2D6 + others
`CYP2D6
`
`CYP3A4
`CYP3A4
`CYP3A4
`CYP3A4
`CYP3A4
`
`No IA
`IM
`JkCI
`(4ICl)
`ICI
`NT
`NT
`
`JtM
`JICI
`No IA
`No IA
`No IA
`(JkCl?)
`No IA
`No IA
`No IA
`NT
`
`Lansoperazole
`(TCI)
`NT
`
`No IA
`No IA
`DC NT
`NT
`NT
`
`NT
`No IA
`
`NT
`No IA
`NT
`
`NT
`NT
`NT
`NT
`Eff. on ovul.?
`
`Pantoprazole
`
`No IA
`No IA
`
`No IA
`No IA
`No IA
`No IA
`No IA
`
`No IA
`No IA
`
`No IA
`NT
`NT
`
`No IA
`NT
`NT
`NT
`No IA
`
`CYP2E1
`CYP3A/2C/1A2
`
`NT
`Alcohol
`NT
`No IA
`(1Cl)
`(TCl)
`Antipyrine
`No IA
`renal excr.
`Methotrexate
`NT
`NT
`(I absorption)
`Absorption
`Digoxin
`NT
`No IA
`I absorption
`Absorption
`Bismuth
`NT
`NT
`IA = interaction; Cl = clearance; M = metabolism; NT = not tested; (= of questionable signifi-
`cance.
`
`Page 5 of 7
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2037
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`208
`
`Meyer:
`
`Metabolism ofproton pump inhibitors
`
`apparently do not interact with CYP2C19 and other CYP2C substrates. The induction of
`CYP1A2 by omeprazole and lansoprazole is reflected by the increased clearance of caf-
`feine [24, 25] and theophylline [26], respectively. No clinically relevant interactions of the
`three drugs with most CYP3A4 substrates have been observed. Extensive studies with pan-
`toprazole showed this drug to have the lowest potential of these three drugs for metabolic
`interactions in vitro and in vivo. The present data-base on interactions is summarized in
`Table 2 and References 1-4, 30, and 38.
`REFERENCES
`1. Wilde, M.I. and McTavis, D. Omeprazole. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use
`in acid-related disorder. Drug 48:91-132, 1994.
`2. Delhotal Landes, B., Petite, J.P., and Flouvat, B. Clinical pharmacokinetics of lansoprazole.
`Clin. Pharmacokinet. 28:458-470, 1995.
`3. Huber, R., Kohl, B., Sachs, G., Senn-Bilfinger, J., Simon, W.A., and Sturm, E. Review article:
`the continuing development of proton pump inhibitors with particular reference to pantoprazole.
`Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 9:363-378, 1995.
`4. Kromer, W. Similarities and differences in the properties of substituted benzimidazoles. a com-
`parison between pantoprazole and related compounds. Digestion 56:443-454, 1995.
`5. Andersson, T., Miners, J.O., Veronese, M.E., Tassaneeyakul, W., Tassaneeyakul, W., Meyer,
`U.A., and Birkett, D.J. Identification of human liver cytochrome P450 isoforms mediating
`omeprazole metabolism. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 36:521-530, 1993.
`6. Andersson, T., Miners, J.O., Veronese, M.E., and Birkett, D.J. Identification of human liver
`cytochrome P450 isoforms mediating secondary omeprazole metabolism. Br. J. Clin.
`Pharmacol. 37:597-604, 1994.
`7. Andersson, T., RegArdh, C.-G., Lou, Y.-Ch., Zhang,-Y., Dahl, M.-L., and Bertilsson, L. Slow
`omeprazole metabolizers are also poor S-mephenytoin hydroxylators. Ther. Drug Monit.
`12:415-146, 1990.
`8. Andersson, T., RegArdh, C.-G., Lou, Y.-Ch., Zhang, Y., Dahl, M.-L., and Bertilsson, L.
`Polymorphic hydroxylation of S-mephenytoin and omeprazole metabolism in Caucasian and
`Chinese subjects. Pharmacogenetics 2:25-31, 1992.
`9. Chiba, K., Kobayashi, K., Manabe, K., Tani, M., Kamataki, T., and Ishizaki, T. Oxidative metab-
`olism of omeprazole in human liver microsomes: cosegregation with S-mephenytoin 4'-hydrox-
`ylation. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap. 266:52-59, 1993.
`10. Balian, J.D., Sukhova, N., Harris, J.W., Hewett, J., Pickle, L., Goldstein, J.A., Woosley, R.L.,
`and Flockhart, D.A. The hydroxylation of omeprazole correlates with S-mephenytoin metabo-
`lism: a population study. Clin. Pharmacother. Therap. 57:662-669, 1995.
`11. Pichard, L., Curi-Pedrosa, R., bonfils, C., Jacqz-Aigrain, E., Domergue, J., Joyeux, H., Cosme,
`J., Guengerich, F.P., and Maurel, P. Oxidative metabolism of lansoprazole by human liver
`cytochromes P450. Molec. Pharmacol. 47:410-418, 1995.
`12. Meyer, U.A. Cytochrome P450 in Human Drug Metabolism: How Much is Predictable? In:
`Waterman, Hildebrand, eds. Assessment of the use of single cytochrome P450 enzymes in drug
`research. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York:Springer Verlag; 1994, pp. 43-56.
`13. Guengerich, F.P. Human cytochrome P450 enzymes. In: de Montellano, O., ed. Cytochrome
`P450, Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry. 2nd edition, New York & London: Plenum
`Press; 1995, pp. 473-535.
`14. Meyer, U.A. and Zanger, U.M. Molecular mechanisms of genetic polymorphisms of drug
`metabolism. Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 37:269-296, 1997.
`15. De Morais, S.M.F., Wilkinson, G.R., Blaisdell, J., Nakamura, K., Meyer U.A. and Goldstein,
`J.A. The major genetic defect responsible for the polymorphism of S-mephenytoin metabolism
`in humans. J. Biol. Chem. 269:15419-15422, 1994.
`16. De Morais, S.M.F., Wilkinson, G.R., Blaisdell, J., Meyer, U.A., Nakamura, K., and Goldstein,
`J.A. Identification of a new genetic defect responsible for the polymorphism of (S)-mepheny-
`toin metabolism in Japanese. Mol. Pharmacol. 46:594-598, 1994.
`17. Sohn, D.-R., Kobayashi, K., Chiba, K., Lee, K.-H., Shin, S.-G., and Ishizaki, T. Disposition
`kinetics and metabolism of omeprazole in extensive and poor metabolizers of S-mephenytoin 4'-
`hydroxylation recruited from an oriental population. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 262:1195-1202, 1992.
`18. Chang, M., Tybring, G., Dahl, M.-L., Gotharson, E., Sagar, M., Seensalu, R., and Bertilsson, L.
`Interphenotype differences in disposition and effect on gastrin levels of omeprazole - suitabili-
`ty of omeprazole as a probe for CYP2C19. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 39:511-518, 1995.
`
`Page 6 of 7
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2037
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`Meyer:
`
`Metabolism ofproton pump inhibitors
`
`209
`
`19. Ishizaki, T., Sohn, D.-R., Kobayashi, K., Chiba, K., Lee, K.H., Shin, S.-G., Andersson, T.,
`Regardh, C.-G., Lou, Y.-C., Zhang, Y., Dahl, M.-L., and Bertilsson, L. Interethnic differences in
`omeprazole metabolism in the two S-mephenytoin hydroxylation phenotypes studied in
`Caucasians and Orientals. Therap. Drug Monit. 16:214-215, 1994.
`20. Price Evans, D.A., Krahn, P., and Narayanan, N. The mephenytoin (cytochrome P450 2C 19)
`and dextromethorphan (cytochrome P450 2D6) polymorphisms in Saudi Arabians and Filipinos.
`Pharmacogenet. 5:64-71, 1995.
`21. Diaz, D., Fabre, I., Daujat, M., Saint Aubert, B., Bories, P., Michel, H., and Maurel, P.
`Omeprazole is an aryl hydrocarbon-like inducer of human hepatic cytochrome P450.
`Gastroenterol. 99:737-747, 1990.
`22. McDonnell, W.M. Scheiman, J.M., and Traber, P.G. Induction of cytochrome P450IA genes
`(CYPIA) by omeprazole in the human alimentary tract. Gastroenterol. 103:1509-1516, 1992.
`23. Buchthal, J., Grund, K.E., Buchmann, A., Schrenk, D., Beaune, P., and Bock, K.W. Induction of
`cytochrome P4501A by smoking or omeprazole in comparison with UDP-glucuronosyltrans-
`ferase in biopsies of human duodenal mucosa. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 47:431-435, 1995.
`24. Rost, K.L. and Roots, I. Accelerated caffeine metabolism after omeprazole treatment is indicat-
`ed by urinary metabolite ratios. Coincidence with plasma clearance and breath test. Clin.
`Pharmacol. Therap. 55:402-411, 1994.
`25. Rost, K.L., Brosicke, H., Heinemeyer, G., and Roots, I. Specific and Dose-dependent enzyme
`induction by omeprazole in human beings. Hepatol. 20:1204-1212, 1994.
`26. Kokufu, T., Ihara, N., Sugioka, N., Koyama, H., Ohta, T., Mori, S., and Nakajima, K. Effects of
`lansoprazole on pharmacokinetics and metabolism of theophylline. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol.
`48:391-395, 1995.
`27. Curi-Pedrosa, R., Daujat, M., Pichard, L., Ourlin, J.C., Clair, P., Gervot, L., Lesca, P.,
`Domergue, J., Joyeux, H., Fourtanier, G., and Maurel, P. Omeprazole and lansoprazole are
`mixed inducers of CYP1A and CYP3A in human hepatocytes in primary culture. J. Pharmacol.
`Exp. Therap. 269:384-392, 1994.
`28. Daujat, M., Peryt, B., Lesca, P., Fourtanier, G., Domergue, J., and Maurel, P. Omeprazole, and
`inducer of human CYPlAl and 1A2, is not a ligand for theAh receptor. Biochem. Biophys. Res.
`Comm. 188:820-825, 1992.
`29. Quattrochi, L.C. and Tukey, R.H. Nuclear uptake of the Ah (Dioxin) receptor in response to
`omeprazole: transcriptional activation of the human CYPlAl gene. Mol. Pharmacol. 43:504-
`508, 1993.
`30. Steinijans, V.W., Huber, R., Harmann, M., Zech, K., Bliesath, H., Wurst, W., and Radtke, H.W.
`Lack of pantoprazole drug interactions in man. Internat. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 32:385-399,
`1994.
`31. Hartmann, M., Bliesath, H., Zech, K., Koch, H., Steinijans, V.W., Wurst, W., and Mascher, H.
`Pantoprazole does not influence CYP1A2 activity in man. Gastroenterol. 108(suppl.):A 109,
`1995.
`32. Andersson, T., Cederberg, Ch., Edvardsson, G., Heggelund A., and Lundborg, P. Effect of
`omeprazole treatment on diazepam plasma levels in slow versus normal rapid metabolizers of
`omeprazole. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 47:79-85, 1990.
`33. Caraco, Y., Tateishi, T., and Wood, A.J.J. Interethnic difference in omeprazole's inhibition of
`diazepam metabolism. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 58:62-72, 1995.
`34. Lefebvre, R.A., Flouvat, B., Karolac-Tamisier, S., Moerman, E., and van Ganse, E. Influence of
`lansoprazole treatment on diazepam plasma concentrations. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 52(5):458-
`463, 1992.
`35. Gugler, R., Hartmann, M., and Rudi, J. Lack of interaction of pantoprazole and diazepam in
`man. Gastroenterol. 102:A77, 1992.
`36. Gugler, R. and Jensen, J.C. Omeprazole inhibits oxidative drug metabolism - studies with
`diazepam and phenytoin in vivo and 7-ethoxycoumarin in vitro. Gastroenterol. 89:1235-1241,
`1985.
`37. Naidu, M.U.R., Shobha, J.C., Dixit, V.K., Kumar, A., Kumar, T.R., Sekhar, K.R., and Sekhar,
`E.Ch. Effect of multiple dose omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine. Drug
`Invest. 7:8-12, 1994.
`38. Tucker, G.T. The interaction of proton pump inhibitors with cytochromes P450. Aliment.
`Pharmacol. Ther. 8:33-38, 1994.
`
`Page 7 of 7
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2037
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket