throbber
CONCLUSION OF MORNING
`BUSINESS
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. Morning
`business is closed.
`f
`
`S5402
`September 8, 2011
`CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE
`America. This transformation is not
`spent 12 years as a U.S. Attorney and
`I yield the floor and suggest the ab-
`without enormous dangers and chal-
`tried cases. I am well aware of how the
`sence of a quorum.
`(Mr.
`The PRESIDING OFFICER
`lenges, but consider how much worse it
`system works. The way the system
`BROWN of Ohio). The clerk will call the
`would have been if a pro-bin Laden
`works in America, you file lawsuits
`roll.
`movement were fueling this trans-
`and you are entitled to your day in
`The assistant legislative clerk pro-
`formation.
`court. But if you do not file your law-
`It is plain we need more of what we
`ceeded to call the roll.
`suit in time, within the statute of limi-
`Mr. SESSIONS. Mr. President, I ask
`had post-9/11 now. I am not naive. I
`tations, you are out.
`unanimous consent that the order for
`know it cannot be conjured up or
`When a defendant raises a legal point
`the quorum call be rescinded.
`wished into existence. But if we are op-
`of order—a motion to dismiss—based
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without
`timistic, if we are inspired by the
`on the failure of the complaining party
`objection, it is so ordered.
`Americans who died here, if we truly
`to file their lawsuit timely, they are
`understand our shared history and the
`out. That happens every day to poor
`f
`sacred place compromise and ration-
`people, widow ladies. And it does not
`ality hold at the very center of the for-
`make any difference what your excuse
`mation of our Nation and the structure
`is, why you think you have a good law-
`of our Constitution, then we can again
`suit, why you had this idea or that
`take up the mantle of shared sacrifice
`idea. Everyone is required to meet the
`and common purpose that we wore
`same deadlines.
`after 9/11 and apply some of those be-
`In Alabama they had a situation in
`haviors to the problems we now con-
`which a lady asked a probate judge
`front.
`when she had to file her appeal by, and
`The reality of our current political
`the judge said: You can file it on Mon-
`climate is that both sides are off in
`day. As it turned out, Monday was too
`their corners; the common enemy is
`late. They went to the Alabama Su-
`faded. Some see Wall Street as the
`preme Court, and who ruled: The pro-
`enemy many others see Washington,
`bate judge—who does not have to be a
`DC, as the enemy and to still others
`lawyer—does not have the power to
`any and all government is the enemy.
`amend the statute of
`limitations.
`I believe the greatest problem we
`Sorry, lady. You are out.
`face is the belief that we can no longer
`Nobody filed a bill in the Congress to
`confront and solve the problems and
`give her relief, or the thousands of oth-
`challenges that confront us; the fear
`ers like her every day. So Medco and
`that our best days may be behind us;
`WilmerHale seeking this kind of relief
`that, for the first time in history, we
`is a big deal. To whom much has been
`fear things will not be as good for our
`given, much is required. This is a big-
`kids as they are for us. It is a creeping
`time law firm, one of the biggest law
`pessimism that cuts against the can-do
`firms in America. Medco is one of the
`and will-do American spirit. And, along
`biggest pharmaceutical companies in
`with the divisiveness in our politics, it
`the country. And presumably the law
`is harming our ability to create the
`firm has insurance that they pay to in-
`great works our forbears accomplished:
`sure them if they make an error. So it
`building the Empire State building in
`appears that they are not willing to ac-
`the teeth of the Great Depression, con-
`cept the court’s ruling.
`structing the Interstate Highway Sys-
`tem and the Hoover Dam, the Erie
`One time an individual was asking
`Canal, and so much more.
`me: Oh, JEFF, you let this go. Give in
`While governmental action is not the
`and let this go. I sort of as a joke said
`whole answer to all that faces us, it is
`to the individual: Well, if WilmerHale
`equally true that we cannot confront
`will agree not to raise the statute of
`the multiple and complex challenges
`limitations against anybody who sues
`we now face with no government or a
`their clients if they file a lawsuit late,
`defanged government or a dysfunc-
`maybe I will reconsider. He thought I
`tional government.
`was serious. Of course WilmerHale is
`As we approach the 10th anniversary
`not going to do that. If some poor per-
`of 9/11, the focus on what happened that
`son files a lawsuit against someone
`day intensifies—what we lost, who we
`they are representing, and they file it
`lost, and how we reacted—it becomes
`one hour late, WilmerHale will file a
`acutely clear that we need to confront
`motion to dismiss it. And they will not
`our current challenges imbued with the
`ask why they filed it late. This is law.
`spirit of 9/11 and determine to make
`It has to be objective. It has to be fair.
`our government and our politics wor-
`You are not entitled to waltz into the
`thy of the sacrifice and loss we suffered
`U.S. Congress—well connected—and
`that day.
`start lobbying for special relief.
`To return to de Tocqueville, he also
`There is nothing more complicated
`remarked that:
`about that than this. So a couple of
`The greatness of America lies not in being
`things have been raised. Well, they sug-
`more enlightened than any other nation, but
`gest, we should not amend the House
`rather in her ability to repair her faults.
`patent bill, and that if we do, it some-
`So, like the ironworkers and oper-
`how will kill the legislation. That is
`ating engineers and trade workers who
`not so. Chairman LEAHY has said he
`miraculously appeared at the pile
`supports the amendment, but he
`hours after the towers came down with
`doesn’t want to vote for it because it
`blowtorches and hard hats in hand,
`would keep the bill from being passed
`let’s put on our gloves, pick up our
`somehow.
`hammers and get to work fixing what
`ails the body politic. It is the least we
`It would not keep it from being
`can do to honor those we lost.
`passed. Indeed, the bill that was
`
`LEAHY-SMITH AMERICA INVENTS
`ACT
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under
`the previous order, the Senate will re-
`sume consideration of H.R. 1249, which
`the clerk will report by title.
`The assistant legislative clerk read
`as follows:
`An Act (H.R. 1249) to amend title 35, United
`States Code, to provide for patent reform.
`AMENDMENT NO. 600
`Mr. SESSIONS. Mr. President, I ask
`unanimous consent to call up my
`amendment No. 600, which is at the
`desk.
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. The
`clerk will report.
`The assistant legislative clerk read
`as follows:
`The Senator from Alabama [Mr. SESSIONS],
`for himself, Mr. MANCHIN, Mr. COBURN, and
`Mr. LEE, proposes an amendment numbered
`600.
`Mr. SESSIONS. Mr. President, I ask
`unanimous consent that the reading of
`the amendment be dispensed with.
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without
`objection, it is so ordered.
`The amendment is as follows:
`AMENDMENT NO. 600
`(Purpose: To strike the provision relating to
`the calculation of the 60-day period for ap-
`plication of patent term extension)
`On page 149, line 20, strike all through page
`150, line 16.
`Mr. SESSIONS. Mr. President, the
`amendment that I have offered is a
`very important amendment. It is one
`that I believe is important to the in-
`tegrity of the U.S. legal system and to
`the integrity of the Senate. It is a mat-
`ter that I have been wrestling with and
`objecting to for over a decade. I
`thought the matter had been settled,
`frankly, but it has not because it has
`been driven by one of the most fero-
`cious lobbying efforts the Congress
`maybe has seen.
`The House patent bill as originally
`passed out of committee and taken to
`the floor of the House did not include a
`bailout for Medco, the WilmerHale law
`firm, or the insurance carrier for that
`firm, all of whom were in financial
`jeopardy as a result of a failure to file
`a patent appeal timely.
`I have practiced law hard in my life.
`I have been in court many times. I
`
`VerDate Mar 15 2010 03:30 Sep 09, 2011 Jkt 099060 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G08SE6.008 S08SEPT1
`
`smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with SENATE
`
`Page 1 of 42
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2007
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`S5403
`September 8, 2011
`CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE
`of the legal system at times and a sup-
`ought to pursue that. There are special
`brought to the House floor didn’t have
`this language in it. The first vote re-
`porter at times. I think they take a
`procedures. The litigation will be over,
`jected the attempt to put this language
`principled position in this instance.
`and they can bring that action at that
`in it. It failed. For some reason, in
`The Wall Street Journal editorial stat-
`time.
`That is the basic position we ought
`some way, a second vote was held, and
`ed:
`it was passed by a few votes. So they
`to be in. A bill that comes out of the
`We take no pleasure in seeing the Medicine
`are not going to reject the legislation
`Judiciary Committee ought to be sen-
`Company and WilmerHale suffer for their
`if we were to amend it.
`sitive to the legal system, to the im-
`mistakes, but they are run by highly paid
`What kind of system are we now in-
`professionals who know the rules and know
`portance of ensuring that the poor are
`that consistency of enforcement is critical
`volved in in the Senate if we can’t undo
`treated as well as the rich. The oath
`to their businesses. Asking Congress to
`an amendment? What kind of argument
`judges take is to do equal justice to the
`break the rules as a special favor corrupts
`is it to say: JEFF, I agree with your
`poor and the rich.
`the law.
`amendment, and I agree it is right that
`How many other people in this coun-
`I think that is exactly right. It is ex-
`they should not get this special relief,
`try are getting special attention today
`actly right. Businesses, when they are
`but I can’t vote for it because it might
`on the floor of the Senate? How many?
`sued by somebody, use the statute of
`cause a problem? It will not cause a
`I truly believe this is not good policy.
`limitations every day. This law firm
`problem. The bill will pass. It should
`I have had to spend far more hours
`makes hundreds of millions of dollars
`never have been put in there in the
`fighting this than I have ever wanted
`in income a year. Their partners aver-
`first place.
`to when I decided 10 years ago that this
`age over $1 million a year, according to
`Another point of great significance is
`was not a good way to go forward.
`the New York Times. That is pretty
`the fact that this issue is on appeal.
`Many battle this issue, and I hope and
`good. They ought to be able to pay a
`The law firm asserted they thought—
`trust that the Members of the Senate
`decent malpractice
`insurance pre-
`and it is a bit unusual—that because it
`who will be voting on this will allow it
`mium. The New York Times said
`came in late Friday they had until
`to follow the legitimate process. Let
`WilmerHale reported revenues of $962
`Monday. We can count the days to
`the litigation work its way through the
`million in 2010, with a profit of $1.33
`Monday—the 60 days or whatever they
`system.
`million per partner.
`had to file the answer. I don’t know if
`If they do not prevail in the litiga-
`Average people have to suffer when
`that is good law, but they won. The dis-
`tion, let a private relief bill be sought
`they miss the statute of limitations.
`trict court has ruled for them. It is on
`and debated openly and publicly to see
`Poor people suffer when they miss the
`appeal now to the court of appeals.
`if it is justified. That would be the
`statute of limitations. But we are un-
`This Congress has no business inter-
`right way to do
`it—not slipping
`dertaking, at great expense to the tax-
`fering in a lawsuit that is ongoing and
`through this amendment and then not
`payers, to move a special interest piece
`is before an appeals court. If they are
`voting to remove it on the basis that
`of legislation that I don’t believe can
`so confident their district court ruling
`we should not be amending a bill before
`be justified as a matter of principle. I
`is correct, why are they continuing to
`us. We have every right to amend the
`agree with the Wall Street Journal
`push for this special relief bill, when
`bill, and we should amend the bill. I
`that the adoption of it corrupts the
`the court of appeals will soon, within a
`know Senator GRASSLEY, years ago,
`system. We ought not be a part of that.
`matter of months, rule?
`was on my side. I think it was just the
`I love the American legal system. It
`Another point: We have in the Con-
`two of us who took this position.
`is a great system, I know. I have seen
`gress a procedure to deal with special
`I guess I have more than expressed
`judges time and time again enter rul-
`relief. If this relief is necessary at all,
`my opinion. I thank the chairman for
`ings based on law and fact even if they
`it should go through as a special relief
`his leadership. I thank him and Sen-
`didn’t like it. That is the genius and
`bill. I can tell you one reason it is not
`ator GRASSLEY for their great work on
`reliability and integrity of the Amer-
`going there now: you can’t ask for spe-
`this important patent bill. I support
`ican legal system. I do not believe we
`cial relief while the matter is still in
`that bill. I believe they have moved it
`can justify, while this matter is still in
`litigation, it is still on appeal. Special
`forward in a fair way.
`litigation, passing a special act to give
`relief also has procedures that one has
`The chairman did not put this lan-
`a wealthy law firm, an insurance com-
`to go through and justify in an objec-
`guage into the bill; it was put in over
`pany, and a health care company spe-
`tive way, which I believe would be very
`in the House. I know he would like to
`cial relief. I just don’t believe we
`healthy in this situation.
`see the bill go forward without amend-
`For a decade, virtually—I think it
`should do that. I oppose it, and I hope
`ments. I urge him to think it through
`has been 10 years—I have been object-
`my colleagues will join us.
`and see if he cannot be willing to sup-
`ing to this amendment. Now we are
`I think we have a real chance to turn
`port this amendment. I am confident it
`here, I thought it was out, and all of a
`this back. Our Congress and our Senate
`will not block final passage of the leg-
`sudden it is slipped in by a second vote
`will be better for it; we really will. The
`islation.
`in the House, and we are told we just
`Citizens Against Government Waste
`I yield the floor.
`can’t make an amendment to the bill.
`have taken an interest in this matter
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen-
`Why? The Senate set up the legislation
`for some time. They said:
`ator from Vermont.
`to be brought forward, and we can offer
`Congress has no right to rescue a company
`Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I will
`amendments and people can vote for
`from its own mistakes.
`speak later about the comments made
`them or not.
`Companies have a right to assert the
`by the distinguished Senator from Ala-
`This matter has gotten a lot of atten-
`law. Companies have a right to assert
`bama. He has been very helpful in get-
`tion. The Wall Street Journal and the
`the law against individuals. But when
`ting this patent bill through. He is cor-
`New York Times both wrote about it in
`the time comes for the hammer to fall
`rect that this amendment he speaks to
`editorials today. This is what the New
`on them for their mistake, they want
`is one added in the other body, not by
`York Times said today about it:
`Congress to pass a special relief bill. I
`us. We purposely didn’t have it in our
`But critics who have labeled the provision
`don’t think it is the right thing to do.
`bill. I know Senator GRASSLEY will fol-
`‘‘The Dog Ate My Homework Act’’ say it is
`Mr. President, let’s boil it down to
`low my remarks.
`really a special fix for one drug manufac-
`There is no question in my mind that
`several things. First, if the company is
`turer, the Medicines Company, and its pow-
`if the amendment of the Senator from
`right and the law firm is right that
`erful law firm, WilmerHale. The company
`Alabama were accepted, it in effect
`they did not miss the statute of limita-
`and its law firm, with hundreds of millions of
`will kill the bill. Irrespective of the
`tions, I am confident the court of ap-
`dollars in drug sales at stake, lobbied Con-
`merits, it can come up on another piece
`peals will rule in their favor, and it
`gress heavily for several years to get the pat-
`ent laws changed.
`of legislation or as freestanding legis-
`will not be necessary for this Senate to
`That is what the Wall Street Journal
`lation. That is fine. But on this bill,
`act. If they do not prevail in the court
`said in their editorial. The Wall Street
`after 6 years of effort to get this far,
`of appeals and don’t win their argu-
`Journal understands business reality
`this bill would die because the other
`ment, then there is a provision for pri-
`and litigation reality. They are a critic
`body will not take it up again.
`vate relief in the Congress, and they
`
`VerDate Mar 15 2010 03:30 Sep 09, 2011 Jkt 099060 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G08SE6.013 S08SEPT1
`
`smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with SENATE
`
`Page 2 of 42
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2007
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`S5404
`
`HURRICANE IRENE
`Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I will use
`my time to note some of the things
`happening in my own very special
`State of Vermont, the State in which I
`was born.
`As Vermonters come together and
`continue to grapple with the aftermath
`of storm damage from Irene, I wish to
`focus today on the agriculture disaster
`that has hit us in Vermont and report
`to the Senate and our fellow citizens
`across the Nation about how the raging
`floodwaters wreaked havoc on our
`farming lands and infrastructure in
`Vermont.
`It was 12 days ago now that this enor-
`mous, slow-moving storm hit Vermont
`and turned our calm, scenic brooks and
`creeks into raging gushers. In addition
`to our roads and historic covered
`bridges that were destroyed or carried
`away, we had barns, farmhouses, crops,
`parts of fields, and livestock washed
`away in the rising floodwaters. I recall
`the comments of one farmer who
`watched his herd of cows wash down
`the river, knowing they were going to
`die in the floodwaters.
`Now the cameras have begun to turn
`away, but the cleanup and urgent re-
`pairs are underway. For major parts of
`Vermont’s economy, the worst effects
`of this storm are yet to come. For our
`dairy farmers, who are the bedrock of
`our economy and keystones of our
`communities, the toll of this disaster
`has been heavy and the crises has
`lasted longer as they have struggled to
`take care of their animals while the
`floodwaters recede.
`This
`is a photograph of East
`Pittsford, VT, taken by Lars Gange
`just over a week ago. The water we see
`is never there. It is there now. Look at
`this farm’s fields, they are destroyed.
`Look at homes damaged and think
`what that water has done.
`As I went around the state with our
`Governor and Vermont National Guard
`General Dubie the first couple of days
`after the storm hit, we went to these
`places by helicopter and I cannot tell
`you how much it tore at my heart to
`see the state, the birthplace to me, my
`parents, and grandparents. To see
`roads torn up, bridges that were there
`when my parents were children, washed
`away. Historic covered bridges, mills,
`barns, businesses just gone and what it
`has done to our farmers, it is hard, I
`cannot overstate it.
`Our farmers have barns that are com-
`pletely gone, leaving no shelter for ani-
`mals. They are left struggling to get
`water for their animals, to rebuild
`fencing, to clean up debris from flooded
`fields and barns, and then to get milk
`trucks to the dairy farms. Remember,
`these cows have to be milked every sin-
`gle day. We also have farmers who do
`not have any feed or hay for their ani-
`mals because it all washed away. As
`one farmer told me, the cows need to
`be milked two or three times every
`day, come hell or high water. This
`farmer thought he had been hit with
`both, hell and high water.
`
`September 8, 2011
`CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE
`While reports are still coming in
`Vermont, as it will be to other States
`from the farms that were affected, the
`coping with the same disaster. I worry
`list of damages and the need for crit-
`the support they need to rebuild may
`ical supplies, such as feed, generators,
`not be there, as it has been in past dis-
`fuel, and temporary fencing is on the
`asters, when we have rebuilt after hur-
`rise. As we survey the farm fields and
`ricanes, floods, fires and earthquakes
`communities, we know it will be dif-
`to get Americans back in their homes,
`ficult to calculate the economic im-
`something Vermonters have supported
`pacts of this violent storm on our agri-
`even though in these past disasters
`culture industry in Vermont.
`Vermont was not touched.
`So I look forward to working with
`Many of our farmers were caught by
`the Appropriations Committee and
`surprise as the unprecedented, rapidly
`with all Senators to ensure that
`rising
`floodwaters
`inundated their
`FEMA, USDA and all our Federal agen-
`crops, and many have had to deal with
`cies have the resources they need to
`the deeply emotional experience of los-
`help all our citizens at this time of dis-
`ing animals to the fast-moving flood-
`aster, in Vermont and in all our states.
`waters. We have farms where whole
`Unfortunately, programs such as the
`fields were washed away and their fer-
`Emergency Conservation Program and
`tile topsoil sent rushing down river.
`the Emergency Watershed Protect Pro-
`The timing could not have been worse.
`gram have been oversubscribed this
`Corn, which is a crucial winter feed for
`year, and USDA has only limited funds
`dairy cows, was just ready for harvest,
`remaining. We also face the grim fact
`but now our best corn is in the river
`that few of our farms had bought crop
`bottoms and is ruined. Other farms had
`insurance and so may not be covered
`just prepared their ground to sow win-
`by USDA’s current SURE Disaster Pro-
`ter cover crops and winter greens; they
`gram.
`lost significant amounts of topsoil.
`But those are the things I am work-
`River banks gave way, and we saw
`ing on to find ways to help our farmers
`wide field buffers disappear overnight,
`and to move forward to help in the
`leaving the crops literally hanging on
`commitment to our fellow Americans.
`ledges above
`rivers, as at
`the
`For a decade, we have spent billions
`Kingsbury farm in Warren, VT. Vege-
`every single week on wars and projects
`table farming is Vermont’s fastest
`in far-away lands. This is a time to
`growing agricultural sector, and, of
`start paying more attention to our
`course, this is harvest season. Our
`needs here at home and to the urgent
`farmers were not able to pick these
`needs of our fellow citizens.
`crops, this storm picked many fields
`I see my friend from Iowa on the
`clean.
`floor, and I yield the floor.
`Many Vermonters have highly pro-
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. The sen-
`ductive gardens that they have put up
`ior Senator from Iowa.
`for their families to get through the
`winter by canning and freezing. Those
`AMENDMENT NO. 600
`Mr. GRASSLEY. Mr. President, I rise
`too have been washed away or are con-
`to rebut the points Senator SESSIONS
`sidered dangerous for human consump-
`made, and I do acknowledge, as he said
`tion because of the contaminated
`on the floor, that 2 or more years ago
`floodwaters. Vermont farmers have a
`I was on the same page he is on this
`challenging and precarious
`future
`issue. What has intervened, in the
`ahead of them as they look to rebuild
`meantime, that causes me to differ
`and plan for next year’s crops, knowing
`from the position Senator SESSIONS is
`that in our State it can be snowing in
`taking? It is a district court case giv-
`11⁄2 or 2 months.
`I have been heartened, however, by
`ing justice to a company—as one cli-
`the many stories I have heard from
`ent—that was denied that sort of jus-
`communities where people are coming
`tice because bureaucrats were acting in
`together to help one another. For in-
`an arbitrary and capricious way.
`Senator SESSIONS makes the point
`stance, at the Intervale Community
`you get equal justice under the law
`Farm on the Winooski River, volun-
`from the judicial branch of government
`teers came out to harvest the remain-
`and that Congress should not try to
`ing dry fields before the produce was
`override that sort of situation. Con-
`hit by still rising floodwaters.
`When the rumors spread that Beth
`gress isn’t overriding anything with
`and Bob Kennett at Liberty Hill Farm
`the language in the House bill that he
`in Rochester had no power and needed
`wants to strike because that interest
`help milking—well, people just started
`was satisfied by a judge’s decision; say-
`showing up. By foot, on bike, all ready
`ing that a particular entity was denied
`to lend a hand to help milk the cows.
`equal justice under the law because a
`Fortunately for them and for the poor
`bureaucrat, making a decision on just
`cows, the Vermont Department of Ag-
`exactly what counts as 60 days, was
`riculture had managed to help get
`acting in an arbitrary and capricious
`them fuel and the Kennetts were milk-
`way. So this language in the House bill
`ing again, so asked the volunteer farm
`has nothing to do with helping a spe-
`hands to go down the road, help some-
`cial interest. That special interest was
`body else and they did.
`satisfied by a judge who said an entity
`Coping with damage and destruction
`was denied equal justice under the law
`on this scale is beyond the means and
`because a bureaucrat was acting in an
`capability of a small State such as
`arbitrary and capricious manner.
`This amendment is not about a spe-
`ours, and Federal help with the re-
`cial interest. This amendment is about
`building effort will be essential to
`
`VerDate Mar 15 2010 23:39 Sep 08, 2011 Jkt 099060 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G08SE6.013 S08SEPT1
`
`smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with SENATE
`
`Page 3 of 42
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2007
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`S5405
`September 8, 2011
`CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE
`The government does not deny that when
`was treating everybody the same, so
`uniformity of law throughout the coun-
`notice of FDA approval is sent after normal
`everybody gets equal justice under the
`try because it is wrong—as the judge
`business hours, the combination of the Pat-
`law, they know what the law is, and
`says—for a bureaucracy to have one
`ent and Trademark Office’s calendar day in-
`they don’t have to rely upon maybe
`sort of definition of when 60 days be-
`terpretation and its new counting method ef-
`some court decision in one part of the
`gins—whether
`it
`is after business
`fectively deprives applicants of a portion of
`country that maybe they can argue in
`hours, if something goes out, or, if
`the 60-day filing period that Congress ex-
`another part of the country, and also
`something comes in, it includes the
`pressly granted them . . . Under PTO’s inter-
`to tell bureaucrats, as the judge said,
`day it comes in. So we are talking
`pretation, the date stamped on the FDA ap-
`proval letter starts the 60-day period for fil-
`that you can’t act in an arbitrary and
`about how we count 60 days, and it is
`ing an application, even if the Food and Drug
`capricious way. But bureaucrats might
`about making sure there is a uniform
`Administration never sends the letter . . .
`act in an arbitrary and capricious way,
`standard for that based upon law
`An applicant could lose a substantial por-
`in a way unknown to them, if we don’t
`passed by Congress and not upon one
`tion, if not all, of its time for filing a Patent
`have a uniform definition of what a
`judge’s decision that applies to one spe-
`Trademark Extension application as a result
`business day is.
`cific case.
`of mistakes beyond its control . . . An inter-
`So I oppose the effort to strike sec-
`I would say, since this case has been
`pretation that imposes such drastic con-
`tion 37 from the patent reform bill for
`decided, there are at least three other
`sequences when the government errs could
`the reasons I have just given, but also
`not be what Congress intended.
`entities that have made application to
`for the reasons that were already ex-
`So the judge is telling us in the Con-
`the Patent Office to make sure they
`pounded by the chairman of this com-
`gress of the United States that because
`would get equal justice under the law
`mittee that at this late date, after 6
`we weren’t precise, there is a question
`in the same way the entity that got
`years of trying to get a patent reform
`as to when Congress intended 60 days
`help through the initial decision of the
`bill done—and we haven’t had a patent
`to start to toll. And the question then
`judge. So this is not about special re-
`reform bill for over a decade, and it is
`is, If it is treated one way for one per-
`lief for one company. This is about
`badly needed—we shouldn’t jeopardize
`son and another way for another per-
`what is a business day and having a
`the possible passage of this bill to the
`son, or if one agency treats it one way
`uniform definition in the law of the
`President of the United States for his
`and another agency treats it another
`United States of what a business day
`signature by sending it back to the
`way, is that equal justice under the
`is, not based upon one district court
`other body and perhaps putting it in
`law? I think it is very clear that the
`decision that may not be applied uni-
`jeopardy. But, most important, I think
`judge said it was not. I say the judge
`formly around our Nation.
`we ought to have a clear signal of what
`So it is about uniformity and not
`was correct. Congress certainly should
`is a business day, a definition of it, and
`about some bailout, as Senator SES-
`not expect nor allow mistakes by the
`this legislation and section 37 makes
`SIONS says. It is not about some fero-
`bureaucracy to up-end the rights and
`that very clear.
`cious lobbying effort, as Senator SES-
`provisions included in the Hatch-Wax-
`This past June, I addressed this issue
`SIONS has said. It is not just because
`man Act or any other piece of legisla-
`in a floor statement, and I want to
`one person was 1 hour late or 1 day
`tion we might pass.
`quote from that because I wanted my
`The court ruled that when the Food
`late, because how do you know whether
`colleagues to understand why I hoped
`and Drug Administration sent a notice
`they are 1 hour late or 1 day late if
`the House-passed bill would contain
`of approval after business hours, the 60-
`there is a different definition under one
`section 37 that was not in our Senate
`day period requesting patent restora-
`circumstance of when 60 days starts
`bill but that was passed out of the
`tion begins the next business day. It is
`and another definition under other cir-
`House Judiciary Committee unani-
`as simple as that.
`cumstances of when a 60-day period
`mously. Speaking as ranking member
`The House, by including section 37,
`tolls?
`of the Senate Judiciary Committee
`takes the court case, where common
`Also, I would suggest to Senator SES-
`now and back in June when I spoke, I
`sense dictates to protect all patent
`SIONS that this is not Congress inter-
`wanted the House Judiciary Committee
`holders against losing patent exten-
`fering in a court case that is under ap-
`to know that several Republican and
`sions as a result of confused counting
`peal because the government lost this
`Democratic Senators had asked me to
`calculations. Regrettably, misunder-
`case and the government is not appeal-
`support this provision as well.
`standings about this provision have
`ing. Now, there might be some other
`Section 37 resulted from a recent
`persisted, and I think you hear some of
`entity appealing for their own interests
`Federal court case that had as its gen-
`those misunderstandings in the state-
`to take advantage of something that is
`esis the difficulty the FDA—the Food
`ment by Senator SESSIONS.
`very unique to them.
`and Drug Administration—and the Pat-
`This provision does not apply to just
`But just in case we have short memo-
`ent Office face when deciding how to
`one company. The truth is that it ap-
`ries, I would remind my colleagues
`calculate Hatch-Waxman deadlines.
`plies to all patent holders seeking to
`that Congress does sometimes interject
`The H

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket