throbber
Paper 51
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: August 31, 2018
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`POZEN INC. and HORIZON PHARMA USA, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases1
`IPR2017-019952 (Patent 9,220,698 B2)
`IPR2018-00272 (Patent 9,393,208 B2)
`____________
`
`
`
`
`1 This order applies to both cases. The parties are not authorized to use this
`style heading in subsequent papers without prior Board authorization.
`2 Petitioner Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc., from IPR2018-000894, has been
`joined as a Petitioner to this proceeding.
`
`
`Before TONI R. SCHEINER and MICHELLE N. ANKENBRAND,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ANKENBRAND, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`Suspending Deadlines Due to Suggestion of Bankruptcy
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01995 (Patent 9,220,698 B2)
`IPR2018-00272 (Patent 9,393,208 B2)
`
`
`On August 28, 2018, Patent Owner Pozen Inc. (“Pozen”) filed a
`Suggestion of Bankruptcy (the “Suggestion”) in each of the above-
`referenced proceedings. Paper 50.3,4 According to the Suggestion, Pozen
`filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 on August 10, 2018. Id. at 2. On
`August 29, 2018, counsel for Petitioner Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`(“Mylan”) requested a conference call to address the impact of the
`Suggestion on the schedule in these proceedings. Ex. 3002. In particular,
`Mylan noted that a deposition was scheduled to proceed on August 31, 2018,
`and that the deadline for the Petitioners’ Reply is September 7, 2018. Id.
`On August 30, 2018, Judges Ankenbrand and Scheiner held a
`conference call with counsel for the parties and bankruptcy counsel for
`Pozen to discuss the Suggestion and its impact on these proceedings.5
`During the conference call, Pozen’s bankruptcy counsel contended that the
`automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362 applies to these proceedings. See also
`Paper 50, 2 (asserting that the proceeding is stayed as of the date of Pozen’s
`bankruptcy petition). Counsel for Mylan and counsel for Dr. Reddy’s
`Laboratories, Inc. did not agree that the automatic stay applies to these
`proceedings, but were amenable to a two-week stay of the proceedings to
`determine how to address Pozen’s contentions regarding the automatic stay.
`
`3 Pozen’s Suggestion is substantively the same in each proceeding. We cite
`to the Suggestion filed in IPR2017-01995.
`4 The challenged patents also are assigned to Horizon Inc. (“Horizon”). The
`Suggestion applies only to Pozen.
`5 Although the Suggestion references a voluntary petition for relief under
`Chapter 11, see, e.g., Paper 50, 2, Pozen did not file the petition in the
`docket of these proceedings. During the course of the conference call, we
`directed Pozen to file a copy of the bankruptcy petition as an exhibit in each
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01995 (Patent 9,220,698 B2)
`IPR2018-00272 (Patent 9,393,208 B2)
`
`
`Given the parties’ disagreement regarding whether the automatic stay
`applies to these proceedings—a disagreement that, in our view, is best
`addressed in the bankruptcy court—we determined that the appropriate
`course of action was to suspend all deadlines in these proceedings until
`further notice.
`
`In view of the foregoing, it is
`ORDERED that all deadlines in these proceedings are suspended until
`further notice;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Pozen shall file a copy of the bankruptcy
`petition as an exhibit in these proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Pozen shall provide the Board with a
`status report on the bankruptcy proceedings by email on or before September
`28, 2018, and every thirty (30) days thereafter until ordered otherwise in
`these proceedings; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mylan (on behalf of Petitioners) shall file
`as exhibits in these proceedings any filings in the bankruptcy court that any
`of the parties to these proceedings, any party to the bankruptcy proceeding,
`or any third party makes, as well as any opinions or orders of the bankruptcy
`court related to whether the automatic stay applies to these proceedings or
`whether relief is granted from such a stay. Mylan shall make such filings in
`these proceedings no more than five (5) business days after the filings are
`made, or the opinions or orders are entered, in the bankruptcy court.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01995 (Patent 9,220,698 B2)
`IPR2018-00272 (Patent 9,393,208 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`Brandon M. White
`Emily Greb
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`bmwhite@perkinscoie.com
`egreb@perkinscoie.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Thomas A. Blinka, Ph.D.
`COOLEY LLP
`TBlinka@cooley.com
`
`Margaret J. Sampson, Ph.D
`BAKER BOTTS LLP
`Margaret.Sampson@bakerbotts.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket