throbber
16m Edition
`
`Kasper Braunwald
`
`Fauci
`
`WARRISON’S
`
`Jameson
`
`Hauser
`
`Longo
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1021 PAGE 1
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1021 PAGE 1
`
`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`

`fects, as with digoxin' theophylline, some antiarrhythmics' aminogly-
`cyclosporine. and anticonvulsants. The common situation of
`"".i¿er,
`ãirt-ord., elimination implies that average, maximum' and minimum
`concentrations a¡e related linearly to the dosing rate' Ac-
`"r"u¿v-rtrt"
`the maintenance dose may be adjusted on the basis of the
`"".¿inelv.
`,^tio Uãt*..n the desiled and measured concentrations ot steody starc;
`in,. .^rtnpl. if a doubling of the steady-state plasma concentration is
`cìesired. the dose should be doubled'
`For drugs that have zero-order kinetics (e.g., phenytoin and the-
`oohvlline), plasma concentrations change disproportionately more
`,trrn th. alteration in the dosing rate. In this situation, changes in dose
`shoulcl be small to minimize the degree of unpredictability, and plasma
`concentration monitoring should be used to ensure that dose modifi-
`cation achieves the desired level'
`DETERMINATI()N 0t MAINTENANCE D0SE An increase in dosage is usually
`best achieved by changing the drug dose but not the dosing interval,
`e.g., by giving 200 mg every 8 h instead of 100 mg every 8 h. However,
`rhis approach is acceptable only if the resulting maximum concentra-
`tion is not toxic and the trough value does not fall below the minirnurn
`effective concentration for an undesirable period of time' Altelna-
`tively, the steady state may be changed by altering the frequency of
`intermittent dosing but not the size of each dose. In this case, the
`magnitude of the fluctuations around the average steady-state level will
`change-the shorter the closing interval, the smaller the difference
`between peak and trough levels (Fig. 3-3).
`Fìuctuation within a dosing interval is cletermined by the relation-
`ship between the dosing interval and the drug's half-life. If the dosing
`interval is equal to the drug's half-life, fluctuation is about twofold,
`which is usually acceptable. With drugs that have a low therapeutic
`ratio, dosage changes should be conservative (<50a/o dose change) and
`not more frequent than every three to fou¡ half-lives. Other drugs, such
`as many antihypertensives, have little dose-related toxicity so the ther-
`apeutic ratio is large. Even if drug is eliminated rapidly, it can be given
`infrequently. Thus, 75 mg of captopril will result in reduced blood
`pressul'e fol up to l2 h, even though captopril elimination half-life is
`about 2 h; this is because the dose raises the concentration of drug in
`plasma many times higher than the threshold for its pharmacologic
`effect.
`
`ETITCTS ()I DISEASE ()N DRUG CONCENTRATI()N AND RESP()NSE
`RtNAL DlStASt Renal excretion ofparent drug and metabolites is gen-
`erally accomplished by glomerular filtration and by specific clrug trans-
`porters, only now being identified. If a drug or its metabolites are
`primarily excreted through the kidneys and increased dlug levels are
`associatecl with adverse effects, drug dosages must be reduced in pa-
`tients with renal dysfunction to auãid toxicity. The antiarrhythmics
`dofetilide ancl sotaiol undergo predominant renal excretion and carry
`a risk of QT prolongation and árrhythmias if doses are not recluced in
`renal disease. Thus, in end-stage renal disease, sotalol can be given as
`40 mg after dialysis {every seóond day), compared to the usual daily
`oose,80 to 120 mg every 12 h. The narcotic analgesic meperidine
`undergoes extensive hepatic rnetabolism, so that renal failure has little
`e\ct on its plasma concentration. However, its metabolite, noÍme-
`pendine. does unclergo renal exc¡etion, accumulates in renal failure,
`antl probably u..or,í. lor lhe signs of central nel'vous system exci-
`latron, such as irritability, twitching, and seizures, that appear when
`multiple_doses of meperidine are aãministered to patients with renal
`0tsease..Protein binding of some drugs (e.g., phenytòin) may be altered
`tn uretnia, .o mearuririg free clrug concentration may be desirable.
`non-end-stage reñal diseasl changes in renal árug clearance are
`^^ln
`Senerally proportiãnar to those in creatinine clearance, which may be
`<ìirectly ol esrimated frorn the serum creatinine (Chap. 259).
`Xt¡,1suLed
`rnls.estimate,
`couplecl with the knowledge of how much dr.ug is nor-
`urdrly excreted renally vs nonrenally, all,ows an estimate of the dose
`requiled. in pracrice, mosr decisions involving dosing ad-
`iilÏtrylt
`liì::.:lt in patients wiih renal faiture use published recommended
`ouJustments in dosage or closing interval baseà on the severity ofrenal
`
`m
`
`dysfunction indicated by creatinine clearance. Any such modification
`of dose is a first approximation and should be followed by plasma
`concentration data (if available) and clinical observation to further
`optimize therapy for the individual patient.
`UVER DISEASE In contrast to the predictable decline in renal clearance
`of drugs in renal insufficiency, the effects of hepatitis or cirrhosis on
`drug disposition range from impaired to increased drug clearance, in
`an unpredictable fashion. Standard tests of liver function are not usefui
`in adjusting doses. First-pass metabolism may decrease, and thus oral
`bioavailability increase, as a consequence of disrupted hepatocyte
`function, alterecl liver architecture, ancl portacaval shunts. The oral
`availability for high-first-pass drugs such as morphine, meperidine,
`midazolam, and nifedipine is almost doubled in patients with cirrhosis,
`compared to those with normal liver function. Therefole, the size of
`the oral dose of such dlugs should be reduced in this setting.
`HEART ffllURE AND 5H0CK Under conditions of decreased tissue per-
`fusion, the cardiac output is redistributed to presel've blood flow to the
`heart and brain at the expense ofother tissues (Chap. 216). As a result,
`drugs may be distributed into a smaller volume of distribution, higher
`dl'ug concentrations will be present in the plasma, and the tissues that
`are best perfused (the brain and heart) will be exposed to these higher
`concentrations. If either the brain or heart is sensitive to the drug, an
`alteration in response will occur. As well, decreased perfusion of the
`kidney and liver may impair drug clearance. Thus, in severe congestive
`heart failure, in hemorrhagic shock, and in cardiogenic shock, response
`to usual dlug doses may be excessive, and dosage reduction rnay be
`necessary. For exarnple, the clearance of lidocaine is reduced by about
`507o in heart failure, and therapeutic plasma levels are achieved at
`infusion rates only about half those usually required. The volume of
`distribution of lidocaine is also reduced, so loading regimens should
`be reduced.
`DRUG USE lN THE ELDERIY Aging results in changes in organ function,
`especially of the organs involved in drug disposition. Therefore, phar-
`macokinetics are often different in elderly inclividuals than in younger
`adults. In the elderly, muitiple pathologies and medications used to
`treat them result in more drug interactions and adverse effects.
`Even in the absence of kidney disease, t'enal clearance may be
`reduced by 35 to 50Vo in eiderly patients. Dosage adjustments are
`the¡efore necessary for drugs that are eliminated mainly by the kid-
`neys. Because muscle mass and therefore creatinine produclion are
`reduced in oider individuals, a normal serum creatinine concentt'ation
`can be present even though creatinine ciearance is impaired; dosages
`should be adjustecl on the basis of creatinine clearance, as discussed
`above. Aging also results in a decrease in the size of and blood flow
`to the liver and possibly in the activity of hepatic drug-metabolizing
`enzymes; accordingly, the hepatic clearance of some dlugs is impairecl
`in the elderly. As with liver disease, these changes ale not readily
`predicted.
`Elderly pâtients may display altered drug sensitivity, Examples in-
`clude increased analgesic effects of opioicls, increased sedation from
`benzodiazepines and other CNS depressants, and increased risk of
`bleeding while receiving anticoagulant therapy, even when clotting
`parameters a¡e well controlled. Exaggerated responses to cardiovas-
`cular drugs are also common because of the impaired responsiveness
`of normal homeostatic mechanisms. Conversely, the elderly display
`decreased sensitivity to B-adrenergic receptor blockers.
`Adverse drug reactions are especially common in the elderly,
`because of altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, the fre-
`quent use of multidrug regimens, and concomitant ciisease. For ex-
`ample, use of long half-1if'e benzodiazepines is linked to the occul'rence
`of hip fractures in elderly patients, perhaps reflecting both a risk of
`falls from these drugs (due to increased sedation) and the increased
`incidence of osteoporosis in elderly patients. In population surveys of
`the noninstitutionalized elderly, as many as 107o had at least one ad-
`velse drug reaction in the previous year.
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1021 PAGE 10
`
`

`

`Poor
`metabolizers
`(PMs)
`
`+
`
`Extensive metabolizers (ËMs)
`
`30
`
`20
`
`0
`
`Ultrarapid
`metabolizers
`
`6oo
`
`.o-
`
`Ø ooEz
`
`0
`
`+ Greater activity
`Lesser act¡vity -+
`flGURt 3-6 CYP2D6 metaboljc activitu
`assessed in 290 subjects bU adminisrra-
`',1as
`tion 0f a test dose of a probe substrate and measurement of urinarg formation 0f the
`CYP2D6-generated metaboljte. The heavu arroü/ indicates a clear antim0de, separating
`poor metabolizer subjects (black), with two loss-0f-function CYPzD6 alleles. lndividuali
`with 0ne or two functional alleles are grouped together as extensjve metabolizers
`(biue). Also shown are ultrarapid metabolizers, with 2 to 11 functionaì copies 0f the
`gene (red) and t2 functional copies (green), dispìaging the greatest enzUme activitu.
`(Adapted bA permission t'rom M-L Dqhl et al: I Pharmacol Exp Ther 274:516, lgg|)-
`
`nosuppressive azathioprine. Homozygotes for alleles encoding the
`inactive TPMT (1 in 300 individuals) predictably exhibit severe and
`potentially fatal pancytopenia on standard doses of azathioprine or 6-
`mercaptopurine. On the other hand, homozygotes for fully functional
`alleles may display less anti-inflammatory or antileukemic effect with
`the drugs. These data illustrate the potential power of a genomic ap-
`proach to optimize therapy, especially in the setting of high-risk phar-
`macokinetics.
`N-acetylation is catalyzed by hepatic N-acetyl transferase (NAT),
`which actually represents the activity of two genes, NAT-1 and NAT-
`2. Both enzymes transfer an acetyl group from acetyl coenzyme A to
`the drug; NAT-1 activity is generally constant, while polymorphisms
`in NAT-2 result in individual differences in the rate at which drugs are
`acetylated and thus define "rapid acetylators" and "slow acetylators."
`Slow acetylators make up -50Vo of European- and African-derived
`populations but are less common among Asians.
`Slow acetylators have an increased incidence of the drug-induced
`lupus syndrome during procainamide and hydralazine therapy and of
`hepatitis with isoniazid. Induction of CYPs (e.g., by rifampin) also
`increases the risk of isoniazid-related hepatitis, likely reflecting gen-
`eration of reactive metabolites of acetylhydrazine, itself an isoniazid
`metabolite.
`Polymorphisms that reduce transcription of uridine diphosphate
`glucuronosyltransferase (UGTl A1) cause benign hyperbilirubinemia
`(Gilbert's disease; Chap.284). These have also been associated with
`diarrhea and increased bone marrow depression with the antineoplastic
`irinotecan, whose active metabolite is normally detoxified by this
`pathway.
`CYP Variants CYP3A4 is the mosr abundant hepatic and intestinal Cyp
`and is also the enzyme responsible for metabolism of the greatest
`number of drugs in therapeutic use. CYP3A4 activity is highly variable
`(up to an order of magnitude) among individuals, but the distribution
`is unimodal, suggesting that the variability does not arise from variants
`in the CYP3A4 gene. The mechanisms underlying this variability are
`not yet well understood. A closely related gene, encoding Cyp3A5
`(which shares substrates with CYP3A4), does display loss-of-function
`variants, especially in African-derived populations. Cyp3A refers to
`both enzymes.
`CYP2D6 accounts for very little total hepatic CYP by weight bur
`is second to CYP3A4 in the number of commonly used drugs that it
`metabolizes. CYP2D6 is polymorphically distributed, with aboutTVo
`of European- and African-derived populations (but very few Asians)
`displaying the PM phenotype (Fig. 3-6). Over 70 loss-of-funcrion var-
`iants in the CYP2D6 gene have been desøibed; the pM phenotype
`arises in individuals with two such alleles. In addition, individuals with
`multiple functional copies of the CYP2D6 gene (ultrarapid metabol-
`izers) have been identified, particularly among northern Africans.
`CYP2D6 represents the main metabolic pathway for a number of drugs
`

`
`ffi¡tfiTrã
`
`Accordingly, optimization of drug therapy in the elderly, particu-
`larly in frail patients, is often difficult, as these multiple factors ac-
`centuate interindividual variability in drug response, Initial doses
`should be less than the usual adult dosage and should be increased
`slowly. The number of medications, and doses per day, should be kept
`as low as Possible.
`
`GEI{ETIC DETERMINANTS OT THE RESP()NSE Tf) DRUGS
`PRINCIPIES 0t GEI{ETIC VARIATI0N AND HUMAN TRATTS (See also Chap.58)
`Variants in the human genome resulting in variation in level of ex-
`pression or function of molecules important for pharmacokinetics and
`pharmacodynamics are increasingly recognized. These may be muta-
`tions (very rare variants, often associated with disease) or polymor-
`phisms, variants that are much more common in a population. Variants
`may occur at a single nucleotide or involve insertion or deletion of
`one or more nucleotides. They may be in the exons (coding regions)
`or introns. Exonic polymorphisms may or may not alter the encoded
`protein, and variant proteins may or may not display altered function.
`Similarly, polymorphisms in intronic regions (including those that reg-
`ulate gene expression) may or may not alter protein level.
`As variation in the human genome is increasingly well docu-
`mented, associations are being described between polymorphisms and
`various traits (including response to drug therapy). Some ofthese rely
`on well-developed chains ofevidence, including in vitro studies dem-
`onstrating variant protein function, familial aggregation of variant al-
`lele with the trait, and association studies in large populations. In other
`cases, the associations are less compelling. Identifying "real" associ-
`ations is one challenge that must be overcome before genomics, and
`in particular the concept of genotyping to identify optimal drugs (or
`dosages) in individual patients prior to prescribing, can be considered
`for widespread clinical practice. Nevertheless, the appeal of this ap-
`proach is considerable.
`Rates of drug efficacy and adverse effects often vary among ethnic
`groups. Many explanations for such differences are plausible; genomic
`approaches have now established that functionally important variants
`determining differences in drug response often display differing dis-
`tributions among ethnic groups. This finding may have importance for
`drug use among ethnic groups, as well as in drug development.
`
`GENtTlcAttY DETTRMINED DRUG D|SP0S|T|ON AND VARIABLE EfttCTS The
`concept that genetically determined variations in drug metabolism
`might be associated with variant drug levels, and hence effect, was
`advanced at the end of the nineteenth century, and the first examples
`of familial clustering of unusual drug responses due to this mechanism
`were noted in the mid-twentieth century. Clinically important genetic
`variants have been described in multiple molecular pathways of drug
`disposition (Table 3-1). These variants are identifled either by directly
`establishing DNA sequence (genotyping) or by phenotyping: exposing
`a large group of otherwise healthy subjects to a specific probe substrate
`for the metabolizing enzyme under study and observing the distribu-
`tion of activity (Fig. 3-6). A distinct multimodal disrriburion argues
`for a predominant effect of variants in a single gene in the metabolism
`of that substrate. Individuals with two alleles (variants) encoding for
`nonfunctional protein make up one group, often termed poor meta-
`bolizers (PM phenotype); many variants can produce such a loss of
`function, complicating the use of genotyping in clinical practice. In-
`dividuals with one functional allele make up a second (intermediate
`metabolizers), and those with two functional alleles a third (extensive
`metabolizers, EMs). On the other hand, a unimodal distribution of
`activity argues against the presence of important single loss-of-func-
`tion alleles in the population under study.
`Tlansferase Variants Ofthe variants in genes encoding drug-metaboliz-
`ing enzymes that have been described to date, one, in the TpMT gene,
`has been adopted as routine clinical practice in some specialized cen-
`ters. TPMT bioinactivates the antileukemic drug 6-mercaptopurine.
`Further, 6-mercaptopurine is itself an active metabolite of the immu-
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1021 PAGE 11
`
`

`

`re
`
`m
`
`ilr¡FftilIlFlt''?ltlr
`receptor that controls intracellular calcium in skeletal muscle and other
`tissues may be asymptomatic until exposed to certain general anes-
`thetics, which trigger ihe syndrome of malignant hyperthemia' Certain
`unilu.Áytrt*l.s ãñd other drugs can produce marked QT prolongation
`ãnJ to.å¿"s de pointes (Cha;.214)' and in some patients this adverse
`."pr"r.nts unmasking àf previously subclinical congenital long
`"iï"",
`QT syndrome.
`
`.- L,^ 2-l ì Codeine is biotransformed by CYP2D6 to the potent ac-
`l,tri;.tu¡il; morpìine' so its effects are blunted in PMs and ex-
`^ -ñêrAïedin ultraraprd metabolizers' With beta blockers metabolized
`??!åüî"ø rtncluding ophthalmic timolol and the antiaffhvthmic pro-
`:itf,,ioniñü subjecls d'isplav greater signs of beta blockade (includ-
`l'ij"'iîïãí*r¿ia and bronchospasm) than EMs' Further' in EM
`elimination bt"ot"t nonlinear at higher doses
`Ï'r#,;;**none
`-^ fnr exâÍtple, a trlpllng of the dose may lead to a tenfold increase
`Tñe oral hvpoglvcemic agent phenformin was
`::';;;;ä"tratio;.
`Ïtrïåj-no-"|ãr." it octationallyóaused profound lactic acidosis; this
`i;:i;';;";t as a result of high òoncentrations in CYP2D6 PMs' ul-
`iliråi,tä'*",iolizers may require verv high dosages of tricvclic an-
`iìi..,."rrunt, to achieve a thérapeutic effect' and with codeine may
`ffiilñ;;t;nt .upto,ia and nãusea due to verv rapid generation of
`morPhine'
`"'"
`fn" eV pt enotype for CYP2C19 is common (20o/o) among Asians'
`to SVo¡- inEuropean-derived-populations' The impact of
`""¿'r"r".i:
`î"**"rptto CYP2C I 9-med'iated metabolism has been demonstrated
`f ump inhibitor omeprazole, where ulcer cure rares with
`iïililil";
`..standard,, dosages were markedly lower in EM patients (29(To) than
`ij PM; (100o/r). Thus, understanding the importanre of this polymor-
`';irm"
`*""1¿ have been important in developing the drug, and know-
`i""", natient's CYP2C19 genotype should improve therapy'
`"'"i;;;.;
`.o-*on allJlic va-riants of CYP2C9 that encode proteins
`wit¡, icrss of catalytic function' These variant alleles are associated with
`u iáqulr"rn"nt foi lower maintenance dose of warfarin'Inrarer (12o/o)
`individuals homozygous for these variant alleles' maintenance war-
`.uv"ù-. difflcult to establish' and the risk of bleeding
`il;';;;;g",
`.åóri"^tiãnt upi.ut, increased' Similarly' patients with loss-of-func-
`ti- CVpZCS aiieles display increased rates of neurologic complica-
`iiãrr *ittt phenytoin and of hypoglycemia with glipizide'
`VARIABIilTY lN THt M0LICUIAR IARGETS WIIH WHICH DRUGS INTERACT As
`,nol.cula, approaches identify specific gene products as târgets of drug
`action, n.tyi,orphisms ttlat âttér the expression or function of these
`d,'rt¿ targeis-and thus modulate their actions in patients-are also
`beiig reJognized. For example, genome-wide searches in families with
`pr"níurrr.ïUheimer's disease have associated variants in the APOE
`iocus with the disease (Chap' 350). -ìhe E4 allele of the gene has been
`associated with a worse prognosis, a finding that has been attributed
`to reduced expression of cho-line acetyltransferase' Further' this poly-
`morphism is also linked to response to the acetylcholinesterase inhib-
`itor tacrine; a beneficial response appears to be more common ln
`patients with the prognosticaliy more bènign A POE2 ot APOE3 alleles
`iin which the target-molecule is expressed more abundantly)'
`Multiple polfmorphisms identifled in the Br-adrenergic receptor
`appear to be linked to speciflc phenotypes in asthma and congestive
`heãrt failure, diseases in it.,ictr þr-recepior function might be expected
`to determine prognosis. Polymorphisms in the p¡receptor gene have
`also been ar*.iãt.¿ *ith iesponr" to inhaled Br-receptor agonists'
`while those in the B,-adrenergic receptor gene have been associated
`with variabilitv in'heart rate slowing and blood pressure lowering'
`Similarly, ,.rotnr. to the 5lipoxygenase inhibitor zileuton in asthma
`has been lintå¿ to polymorphìsmi ihat determine the expression level
`of the 5-lipoxvn.nur.' g"n". Herceptin, which potentiates anthracyc-
`line-relateå .urãloto*i.i"ty, is ineffective in breast cancers that do not
`express the herceptin recãptor; thus, "genotyping" the tumor is a mech-
`anism to avoid pàtentially toxic therapy in patients who would derive
`no benefit.
`Drugs may also interact with genetic pathways of disease' to elicit
`or exacerbate svmptoms of the underlying conditions. In the porphyr-
`ras' CYP inducårs äre thought to increase the activity of enzymes prox-
`tmal to the deficient
`exacerbating or triggering attacks (Chap'
`"nryrri",
`J37)' Deficiency of glucåse-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD)' most
`often in individíul, ãr ef.i.unìr M-editeranean descent, increases risk
`of hemolytic anemia in response to primaquine and a number of other
`orugs thai do not cause heåolysis in patients with adequate quantities
`ot this enzyme 1Chap. 93). Pátients ;ith mutations in the ryanodine
`
`P0|.YM0RPHISMSTHAIM0Dul"ATtTHEBl()toGlccoNTEnWlTHll{WHICHTHE
`uiuc-nna¡r lNTERAcfl0Ns 0ccUR The interaction of a drug with its
`.o1".uf* target is translated into a clinical action ìn a complex bio-
`i"gi" .ifi"" tlhat is itself often perturbed by disease' Thus' polymor-
`pt.,i.-, tttut determine variabiiity in this biology may profoundly
`influence drug response, although the genes involved are not them-
`,-J", at""tfi targets of drug aðtion. The common insertion/deletion
`iVDt p;iy-";pniJn in the ACE gene determines prognosis in many
`ìVpá l,f "heart^disease, including heart failure' In patients with heart
`iäiture treate¿ with B-adrenergicblockers, the best response to therapy
`ha, b."n associated with the DD genotype, the group with the worst
`ptãgt*i.. itt" mechanism underlying this outcome is uncertain' but
`å ¿i.., effect of beta blockers on ACE seems unlikely; rather the IID
`g*oiyp" likely affects the biology of heart failure to allow an im-
`itou"i*tp*se to beta blockers' Similarly' polymorphisms in genes
`'important ior lipid homeostasis (such as the ABCAI transporter and
`the cholesteroÌ ester transport protein) modulate response to HMG-
`CoA reductase inhibitors. ìn one large study' the combination of di-
`ur"tl. ur" combined with a variant in the adducin gene (encoding a
`protein important for renal tubular sodium absorption)
`"yiort.f"tuf
`decreased stroke or myocardial infarction risk' while neither factor
`alone has an effect. Common polymorphisms in ion channel genes that
`are not themselves the target oi QT-prolonging drugs may nevertheless
`influence the extent to wñich those drugs affect the electrocardiogram
`and produce arrhYthmias.
`
`PR0SPECTSt0RlNC0RP()RAT|NGGENtTlclNt0RMAIl0tllNToctlNlcAtPRAcIlcE
`These and many other examples of associations between speciflc geno-
`types and drug responses rãise the tantalizing prospect that patients
`iitt unO".go rãutinã genotyping for loci known to.modulate drug lev-
`els or respónse prior to receiving a prescription' The twin goals are to
`iOentity patients likely to exhibii adverse effects and those most likely
`,ã tàtói,¿ well. Obsiacles that must be overcome before this vision
`a reality include replication of even the most compelling
`;;;;"t
`urro.iutionr, deÅonstrations of cost-effectiveness' development of
`.".ãäv tt""fre genotyping technologies, and ethical issues involved
`i"-æ."rypi"g. iVnif.-tt.t"t" barriers seem daunting' the field is very
`rapidlv' Indeed' one major result of understanding
`;;;;;ä;;"lving
`ái irrË -r" of genJics in árug action has been improved screening of
`ã."g, ¿"titg îhe deuelopmJnt process to.reduce the likelihood of
`metabolism or unanticipated toxicity (such as torsades
`t igf;fy "^¡"frf.
`de pointes).
`
`INTERACTI()NS BETWEEI'I DRUGS
`Drug interactions can complicate therapy by adversely increasing or
`ã"..?uting the action of a dìug; interactions may. be based on changes
`in árug disposition or in druf response in the absence of changes in
`ãt"g fã".h. Interactions ntuit be consiclered in the dffirential díag'
`,,oíi, of any unustnl response occuning during drug therapy' P,re-
`scrluerå sháuld recogn tzà that patients often come to them with a
`drugs acquìred during previou.s medical experiences' often
`i"g".t
`"f
`*irft .tfripf" physicians who måy not be aware-of all the patient's
`medicationì. Á meticulous drug history should include examination of
`it" fu,ø*'t medications and,lf necessary' calls to the pharmacist to
`iã""',irv prescriptions. It should also address the use of agents not often
`volunteered during questioning, such as over-the-counter (OTC)
`O."gt, tt"^f,n food'supþlements, and topical agents such as eye drops'
`List"s of interactions are available from a number of electronic sources'
`ífl. pru"ti.ing physician cannot be expected to memorize these' How-
`
`L o l
`
`s
`re
`
`Þd
`
`pd
`of
`l*o
`þn-
`tuid
`
`lul.
`rnla
`þirh
`fstic
`ithis
`
`'P
`
`YP
`iatest
`iable
`ution
`dants
`fY are
`P3A5
`[ction
`lers to
`
`tht but
`thât it
`t¡¿t'7 70
`\sians)
`bn var-
`hotype
`¡ls with
`¡etabol-
`¡fricans.
`cf drugs
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1021 PAGE 12
`
`

`

`ÍABIE 3-2 Drugs wíth a High Risk of Generating Phdrndcokinetic lnteruLtilns
`Dtug
`Mechanism
`
`Examples
`
`Antacids; bile acid sequestrânts
`
`Reduced absorption
`
`Proton pump inhibitors; H.-
`receptor blockers
`Rifampin; carbamazepine;
`barbiturates; phenytoin; St.
`John's wort; glutethimide
`Tricyclic antidepressants;
`fluoxetine; quinidine
`Cimetidine
`
`Ketoconazole, itraconazole;
`erythromycin, clarithromycin;
`calcium channel blockers;
`ritonavir
`
`Altered gastric pH
`
`lnduction of hepatic metabolism
`
`Inhibitors of CYP2D6
`
`lnhibitor of multiple
`CYPs
`Inhibitor of CYP3A
`
`Allopurinol
`
`Amiodarone
`
`Xanthine oxidase
`inhibitor
`Inhibitor of many CYPs
`and of P-glycoprotein
`Gemfibrazol (and other fibrates) CYP3A inhibition
`
`Quinidine; amiodaronei
`verapamil; cyclosporine;
`itraconazole; erythromycin
`Phenylbutazone, probenecid;
`salicylates
`
`P-glycoprotein inhibition
`
`Inhibition of renal tubula¡
`transport
`
`Antacids/tetracyclines; cholestryamine/
`digoxin
`Ketoconazole absorption decreased
`
`Decreased concentration and effects of:
`warfarin; quinidine; cyclosporine;
`losartan
`lncreased beta blockade; decreased
`codeine effect
`Increased concentration and effects of:
`warfarin; theophylline; phenytoin
`Increased concentration and toxicity of:
`some HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors;
`cyclosporine; cisapride, terfenadine
`(now withdrawn)
`Increased concentration and effects of:
`indinavir (with ritonavir);
`Decreased clea¡ance and dose
`requirement for:
`cyclosporine (with calcium channel
`blockers)
`Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine
`toxicity
`Decreased clearance (risk of toxicity)
`for:
`warfarin; digoxin; quinidine
`Rhabdomyolysis when co-prescribed
`with some HMG-CoA reductase
`inhibitors
`Risk of digoxin toxicity
`
`as warfarin and some antiaffhvth-
`mics. Individuals vary in the ex-
`tent to which drug metabolism
`can be induced, likely through
`genetic mechanisms.
`lnhibition of Cellular Uptake or
`Binding Tricyclic anridepres-
`sants, doxepin, and chlorproma-
`zine are potent inhibitors of
`norepinephrine uptake into adre-
`nergic neurons and prevent the
`uptake of the guanidinium anti-
`hypertensive agents (such as gua-
`nethidine and guanadrel), thereby
`abolishing their antihypertensive
`effects. Similarly, the antihyper-
`tensive effect of clonidine is par-
`tially antagonized by tricyclic
`antidepressants.
`
`Salicylates + increased risk of
`methotrexate toxicity
`
`PHARMACOKINETIC INTERACTIONS
`CAUSING INCREASED DRUG DETIVTRY
`T0 TARGET 5lTE5 r tnhibition of
`Drug Metabolism Inhibition of
`drug metabolism can lead to re-
`duced clearance, plolonged half-
`life, accumulation of drug during
`maintenance therapy, and thus
`adverse effects. In contrast to in-
`duction, new protein synthesis is
`not involved, and the effect de-
`velops as drug and any inhibitor
`metabolites accumulate (a func-
`tion of their elimination half-
`lives). Since shared substrates of a single enzyme can compete for
`access to the active site of the protein, many CYP substrates can also
`be considered inhibitors. However, some drugs are especially potent
`as inhibitors (and occasionally may not even be substrates); it is in the
`use of agents of the latter type that clinicians must be most alert to the
`potential for interactions.
`Cimetidine (but not other Hr-receptor blockers) is a potent inhibitor
`of the oxidative metabolism of many drugs, including warfarin, quin-
`idine, nifedipine, lidocaine, theophylline, and phenytoin. Severe ad-
`verse reactions can develop as a consequence.
`The antifungal agents ketoconazole and itraconazole are potent in-
`hibitors of enzymes in the CYP3A family. When fluconazole levels
`are elevated as a result of higher doses and/or renal insufficiency, this
`drug can also inhibit CYP3A. The macrolide antibiotics erythromycin
`and clarithromycin inhibit CYP3A4 to a clinically significant extent,
`but azithromycin does not. Some of the calcium channel blockers,
`including diltiazem, nicardipine, and verapamil can also inhibit
`CYP3A, as can some of the enzyme's substrates, such as cyclosporine.
`Examples of CYP3A substrates also include quinidine, lovastatin, sim-
`vastatin, atorvastatin, nifedipine, lidocaine, erythromycin, methylpred-
`nisolone, carbamazepine, midazolam, and triazolam.
`Phenytoin, an inducer of many systems including Cyp3A, inhibits
`CYP2C9. CYP2C9 metabolism of losartan to its active metabolite is
`inhibited by phenytoin, with potential loss of antihypertensive effect.
`Accumulation of the prokinetic drug cisapride and the antihista-
`mine terfenadine due to CYP3A inhibition led to QT prolongation and
`torsades de pointes. Measures to prevent co-prescription of these
`agents with CYP3A inhibitors were unsuccessful, and alternative safer
`agents were developed, so these drugs were eventually withdrawn.
`Cyclosporine can cause serious toxicity when its metabolism via
`CYP3A4 is inhibited by erythromycin, ketoconazole, diltiazem, ni-
`cardipine, or verapamil. The risk of myopathy with some HMG-CoA
`reductase inhibitors (lovastatin, simvastatin, atoryastatin) is thought to
`be increased by CYP3A4 inhibition. One agent in this class, cerivas-
`
`ever, certain drugs consistently run the risk of generating interactions,
`through mechanisms that are well understood; examples (not an ex-
`haustive listing) are presented below and in Table 3-2. When such
`drugs are started or stopped, prescribers must be especially alert to the
`possibility of interactions.
`
`PHARMAC()KINETIC
`
`INTIRASTI()NS CAUSING DIMINISHED DRUG DTI.IVTRY T()
`TARGTT slTt5 I lmpaired Gastrointestinal Absorption Aluminum ions,
`present in antacids, can form insoluble chelates with the tetracyclines,
`preventing their absorption. Kaolin-pectin suspensions bind digoxin,
`and when the substances are administered together, digoxin absotption
`is reduced by about one-half. Resins that sequester bile acids in the
`gut can bind other drugs, such as digoxin. Ketoconazole is a weak base
`that dissolves well only at acidic pH. Histamine Ftr, receptor antago-
`nists and proton pump inhibitors reduce gastric acidity and thus impair
`the dissolution and absorption of ketoconazole.
`lnduction of CYP or Transporter Activitu Expression of some genes re-
`sponsible for drug elimination, notably CYP3A and MDRI , can be
`markedly increased by "inducing" dr.ugs, such as rifampin, carba-
`mazepine, phenytoin, St. John's wort, and glutethimide and by smok-
`ing, exposure to chlorinated insecticides such as DDT (CyplA2), and
`chronic alcohol ingestion. One mechanism for this coordinate induc-
`tion of multiple pathways is increased expression of common tran-
`scription factors (e.g., hepatocyte nuclear factor 4a). Administrat

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket