throbber

`

`Clinical Therapeutics®
`
`CIRCULATION
`Group Circulation Director: Robert W. De Angelis
`Circulation Director: Georgann Carter
`Circulation Assistant: Michele Biscardi
`Reprints/Permissions Mana ger: Beatrix Valles
`(800) 722-3422, (908) 281-3694
`FAX (908) 874-7089
`PUBLISHING STAFF
`Vice President/Group Publisher:
`Kenneth F. Senerth
`Publisher: Stan Heimberger, Ph.D.
`(908) 874-8550
`
`EDITORIAL
`Group Editor: Keyo S. Ross (908) 874-0548
`Managing Editor: Lisa Kasarda
`Administrative Coordinator: Jean A. Bidilikian
`ART
`Senior Art Director: Jennifer L. Kmenta
`Art Director: Mark Thomas
`QUALITY CONTROL
`Director: Jim Adamczyk
`Proofreader: Theresa Salerno
`PRODUCTION AND MANUFACTURING
`Director, Manufacturing Operations: Frank A. Lake
`Production Supervisor: Jacqueline M. Master (908) 281 -3648
`Production Manager/Reprints: Kelley Moore
`Excerpta Medica, Inc., a Reed Elsevier Medical Publishing company
`President: Ronald H. Schlosser
`Vice President and Treasurer: Robert F. Issler
`Vice President, Secretary, and General Counsel: Louis J . Andreozzi
`Business Manager: Luis 0. Portera
`105 Ra ider Boulevard
`Belle Mead, NJ 08502-1510
`Trademarks: Clinical Therapeutics® is a registered trademark of Excerpta Medi ca, Inc.
`Publisher: Clinical Therapeutics® (ISSN O 149-2918) (GST # 128741063) is published bimonthly by
`Excerpta Medica, Inc., a Reed Elsevier Medical Publishing company, with business offices at 105
`Raider Boulevard, Belle Mead, New Jersey 08502- 15 10, telephone (908)874-8550, fax (908)874-0700.
`Copyright: Copyright 1994 by Excerpta Medica, Inc. All rights reserved under the United States,
`International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this publica ti on may be repro(cid:173)
`duced, stored in a retrieval system , or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, com (cid:173)
`puter, photocopying, electronic recording or otherwise, w ithout the prior written permission of Ex(cid:173)
`cerpta Medica, Inc. The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, U.S.C., as amended) gove rns
`the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted m ate rial.
`Photocopy Permissions Policy: T his publication has been registered with Copyright Clearance Cen(cid:173)
`ter, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts O 1923, telephone (508)750-8400. Per(cid:173)
`mission is granted for the photocopying of specified articles provided that the base fee is paid directly
`to CCC (ref. Clinical Therapeutics® ISSN 0149-2918, specifying volume, number, date and title of ar(cid:173)
`ticle). T his consent does not extend to other ki nds of copying, such as for general distribution, resale,
`advertising, and promotional purposes, or for creating new collective works.
`Opinions: Opi nions expressed in articles are those of the autho rs and do not necessarily reflect
`those of Excerpta Medica, Inc. or the Ed ito rial Board. Excerpta Medica, Inc. assumes no liability
`for any material published herein.
`Reprints: Contact Beatrix Valles , telephone (800)722-3422 or (908)281-3694, fax (908)874-7089.
`Subscriptions: Subscriptions are U .S. $78 ($ 12 additional for orders outside the U.S.). Single cop(cid:173)
`ies and back issues are U.S. $ 15. C irculation record s are maintained at P.O. Box 3000, Denville ,
`NJ 07834--3000.
`Send address changes to: Clinical Therapeutics®, P.O. Box 3000, Denvi lle, NJ 07834--3000.
`Manuscripts: Submit manusc ripts to Clinical Therapeutics®, I 05 Raider Boulevard, Belle Mead,
`NJ 08502.
`Postmaster: Send address corrections to Clinical Therapeutics®, P.O. Box 3000, Denville, NJ
`07834-3000.
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1018 PAGE 2
`
`

`

`CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS®/VOL. 16, NO. 6, 1994
`
`Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Enteric-Coated Naproxen
`Tablets Compared with Standard Naproxen Tablets
`
`Donald Jung, PhD, and Kenneth E. Schwartz, MD
`Syntex Research, Palo Alto, California
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`In thi s open-label, randomized, cross(cid:173)
`over study, 24 healthy volunteers (12
`men and 12 women) received either en(cid:173)
`teric-coated (EC) naproxen tablets 500
`mg twi ce daily or standard naproxen
`tablets 500 mg twice daily for 7 days.
`In each of the two study periods, blood
`sampling began on day 8, after one last
`dose of the study dru g was admini s(cid:173)
`tered, to determine and compare steady(cid:173)
`state pharmacokinetics for each of the
`two naproxen formulations. The plasma
`half-life of naproxen averaged 16.3 and
`16. 9 hours following EC naproxen and
`standard naproxen treatments, respec(cid:173)
`tively. Mean time to maximum plasma
`concentration (T max) was greater for EC
`naproxen than for stand ard naproxen
`(4.0 vs 1.9 hours), while the maximum
`observed plasma concentration (Cmax)
`was sli ghtly, but not signifi ca ntl y,
`small er (94.9 vs 97.4 µ g/mL, respec(cid:173)
`tively). The mean values for average
`
`plasma concentration (Cave) and mini(cid:173)
`mum pla sma concentration for EC
`naproxen were 70.4 and 60.6 µg/mL,
`respectively, compared with 63.9 and
`44.1 µ g/mL for standard naproxen.
`The mean plasma fluctuation about the
`mean was greater
`for
`standard
`naproxen than for EC naproxen (85.3 %
`vs 49.3%), while the mean area under
`the plasma concentration-time curve
`(AUC) was smaller for standard
`naproxen (766.8 vs 845.0 µg x h/mL).
`At steady state, EC naproxen was sim(cid:173)
`ilar to standard naproxen tablets with
`respect to Cmax, Cave, Cma,:Cave, 0- to 12-
`hour AUC, and half- life but differed in
`T max-
`In additi on, flu ctuations about
`Cave in pl asma levels were considerably
`lower with EC naproxe n than with
`standard naproxen.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Naproxen is a nonsteroidal anti-inflam(cid:173)
`matory drug with analgesic and antipy-
`
`0149-291 W4IS3.S0
`
`923
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1018 PAGE 3
`
`

`

`retie properties. The e fficacy and tol(cid:173)
`e rability of naproxen in the ma nage(cid:173)
`me nt o f rheumatoid di sease s, go ut,
`pain, and dysmenorrhea have been well
`establi shed in ma ny years of c linical
`use. 1 An enteric-coated (EC) formula(cid:173)
`tion' of naproxen was developed to re(cid:173)
`lease na proxe n at the pH level of the
`small intestine , where di ssolution takes
`place.
`An in vivo eva lu ati o n o f EC na(cid:173)
`proxe n tabl e ts ha s s how n th a t the
`naproxen blood levels over time were
`consistent with th e delayed re lease of
`naproxen from the tabl ets,2 but no data
`comparin g the steady-state pharmaco(cid:173)
`kinetics of EC naproxen with standard
`na proxen ha ve been publi she d. The
`current study was designed to compare
`the stead y-state pharmacokin eti cs of
`EC naproxen and standard tabletst in a
`group of healthy men and women.
`
`SUBJECTS AND METHODS
`
`Thi s was an o pe n-labe l, rando mi zed
`stud y o f c rossover des ig n. Twe nty(cid:173)
`four heal thy men and women w hose
`body weights were within 15% of the
`average weig ht for th e ir age and
`height, as determined from the Metro(cid:173)
`politan Life Insurance tables, partici(cid:173)
`pated in the study. 3 Participants were
`selected on the basis of an essentially
`problem-free medical history, a normal
`phy s ica l e xamina tion , and a ro utine
`laboratory test profile showing no clin(cid:173)
`ically sig nificant abnormalities. Ins ti(cid:173)
`tutio nal review board approval was ob(cid:173)
`ta in ed . The study was ex pla ined to
`
`Trademarks: EC-Naprosyn®' and Naprosyn®t (Syn(cid:173)
`tex Laboratories, Inc., Palo Alto, California).
`
`924
`
`CLlN ICAL THERAPEUTICS®
`
`subjects in no ntechnical terms, and all
`subjects signed a written informed con(cid:173)
`sent form and an Experimental Subjects
`Bill of Rights before participating.
`The two study regimens were: 500-
`mg EC naproxen tablets twice daily fo r
`7 days plus one dose o n day 8, and 500-
`mg standard naproxen tablets twice daily
`for 7 days plus one dose on day 8.
`After an overnig ht fast (beginning at
`9:30 PM the prev ious night), each sub(cid:173)
`ject received, in random order, 500 mg
`twice daily EC na proxe n or sta ndard
`naproxen for 7 days and a fin al dose on
`day 8. Adverse e vents were mo nitored
`at each blood d rawing, and the subjects
`informed the study physician or trained
`o bserver of any ad verse events that oc(cid:173)
`curred during the study. A washout pe(cid:173)
`riod of 8 days fo llowed each treatme nt.
`Se ri al bl ood samples we re collected
`afte r the fin al morning dose for up to
`72 ho urs. To det ermin e naprox e n
`tro ug h leve ls, s ing le blood sa mple s
`were also collecte d on days 6 and 7 be(cid:173)
`fore the morning dose. The plasma from
`each bl ood sample was separated i m(cid:173)
`medi ate ly, tra nsferred into vials, and
`frozen for subsequent assay of naprox(cid:173)
`e n by usin g hig h-performance liquid
`chromatog raphy.4 Plasma levels below
`the qua nti fi catio n lim it of 0.5 µ g/mL
`naproxen at time zero were set to zero
`for the calculation of mean plas ma lev(cid:173)
`els and computed variables.
`
`StaJistical and Pharmacokinetic Analyses
`
`The foll owing pharmacokinetic vari(cid:173)
`ables were determined on day 8:
`•T max-time to maxi mu m p las ma
`concentratio n;
`•Pl as ma ha lf- life- computed over
`the 24- to 72-hour interval by using log
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1018 PAGE 4
`
`

`

`D. JUNG AND K.E. SCHWARTZ
`
`Table I. Demographic characteristics.
`
`Variable
`
`Age (y)
`Mean±SD
`Range
`Body weight (kg)
`Mean±SD
`Range
`Height (cm)
`Mean±SD
`Range
`
`Men (n = 12)
`
`Women (n = 12)
`
`29.8± 4.6
`22- 35
`
`82± II
`64-94
`
`184±6
`175- 193
`
`30.9 ±7. 1
`22-47
`
`64±6
`55- 75
`
`168±6
`157-1 76
`
`linear regression analysis of the plasma
`concentration versus time data;
`•Cmax- maxi mum observed pl asma
`concentration;
`•0- to 12-hour AUC-area under the
`plasma concentration-time curve from
`0 to 12 hours, computed using the lin(cid:173)
`ear trapezoidal rule;
`•Cave-average plasma concentration
`computed as the ratio of AUC divided
`by the dosing interval (12 hours);
`•C1ow-minimum (trough ) pl asma
`concentration at time of dosing com(cid:173)
`puted as the mean of the zero and 24-
`hour values ;
`•Cma, :C1ow- peak to trough plas ma
`ratio;
`•Cma, :Cave-peak to average plasma
`concentration ratio;
`•Fluctuation-100 x (Cmax - Cmin)/
`Cave ( ie, percent fluctuation about aver(cid:173)
`age plasma concentration).
`An analysis of variance (AN OVA)
`model appropri ate for a crossover de(cid:173)
`sign was used, 5 and the statistical anal(cid:173)
`yses were performed for the pharmaco(cid:173)
`kineti c variables according to the
`General Linear Mode l procedure of the
`Statistical Analysis System, Version
`5.16. 6 The ANOVA model in c luded
`
`terms for sequence, subjects within se(cid:173)
`quence, formulation, and period effects.
`Ninety percent c lassic confidence in(cid:173)
`tervals7 for the ratio of EC naproxen to
`standard naproxen were obtained using
`the t distribution. Confidence limits
`(90%) on the difference in the regime n
`means were computed using an error
`term derived from ANOVA. These lim(cid:173)
`its were then expressed as percentages
`of the re ference mean by di viding the
`upper and lower limits of the confi(cid:173)
`dence inte rval by the estimated refer(cid:173)
`ence mean and then adding 100%. Two
`reg imens were considered equi vale nt
`with respect to a given variable if the
`two means differed by less than 20% or
`the confidence interval was within 80%
`to 120%, with 90% confidence.
`In addition, the trough levels on days
`6, 7, and 8 were compared to demon(cid:173)
`strate that steady-state levels had bee n
`attained by day 8. ANOVA procedures
`with terms in the model for subject and
`day were used for this comparison.
`
`RESULTS
`
`The demographic characteristics (Table
`I) were calculated separately for the 12
`
`925
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1018 PAGE 5
`
`

`

`men and 12 women in the study. All
`subjects completed the study normally.
`Adverse events were reported by 9
`(37.5%) of 24 subjects. Headaches and
`gastrointestinal complaints were the
`most frequently reported adverse events.
`With the standard naproxen tablet regi(cid:173)
`men, headaches and stomachaches oc(cid:173)
`curred in three subjects and dyspepsia
`in one. With the EC naproxen regimen,
`headaches occurred in three subjects,
`but there were no gastrointestinal com(cid:173)
`plaints. Most events associated with
`the two naproxen regimens were classi(cid:173)
`fied by the investigator as probably not
`related to the study medication , and
`none were clinically serious. Concom(cid:173)
`itant medications take n during the
`study were not considered like ly to
`affect the conduct or outcome of the
`
`CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS®
`
`study. Laboratory tests and physical
`examinations revealed no c lini call y
`significant abnormalities.
`Stati stically s ignificant (P < 0 .05)
`diffe re nces in trough concentrations
`between day s were observed for the
`naproxen standard tablets; there were
`no statistically significant time (day)
`effects for th e EC naprox e n table ts
`(Table II). The mean trough levels for
`the standard naproxen tablet were 46.0,
`49.9, and 45.9 µg/mL for days 6, 7, and
`8, respectively. The significant differ(cid:173)
`ence was owing to a higher naproxen
`concentration on day 7 than that o n
`days 6 and 8. The ratios and confi(cid:173)
`dence limits (90%) were calculated for
`the ratios of days 6 and 7 to day 8 for
`each formulation and are shown in
`Table II. Although significant day ef-
`
`Table IT. Naproxen trough plasma concentrations (µg/mL) and steady-state comparisons.
`
`p•
`
`0.244
`
`0.020
`
`Day6
`
`Day7
`
`Day8
`
`Day6:8
`
`Day7:8
`
`Ratio
`
`ECNaproxen
`Mean
`SD
`Cvar
`Minimum
`Maximum
`Ratio(%)
`cit
`Standard Naproxen
`Mean
`SD
`Cvar
`Minimum
`Maximum
`Ratio(%)
`cit
`
`73.4
`18.8
`25.7
`46.1
`120.4
`
`46.0
`9.0
`19.5
`27.8
`64.1
`
`76.8
`23.3
`30.4
`20.7
`123.1
`
`49.9
`11.9
`23.8
`26.7
`77.6
`
`68.5
`2 1.1
`30.8
`29.0
`115.2
`
`45.9
`9.4
`20.6
`26.6
`65.4
`
`107
`95-11 9
`
`11 2
`100-124
`
`100
`95-106
`
`109
`103- 114
`
`EC= enteric-<:oated; Cvar = coefficient of variation; CI= confidence interval.
`• P value is for day effect (analysis of variance model has terms for subject and day).
`t90% Cl (limits in %).
`
`926
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1018 PAGE 6
`
`

`

`D. JUNG AND K.E. SCHWARTZ
`
`- 80
`..J 1 :::t - 60
`l!! -C
`
`40
`
`20
`
`C
`0
`:;:.
`
`~
`C
`0
`0
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`8
`10
`Time (h)
`
`12 24
`
`48 72
`
`Figure 1. Mean naproxen plasma concentrations at steady state (day 8) over time following
`oral administration of standard naproxen <•) and enteric-coated (EC) naproxen (e ).
`fec ts were observed for the standard
`compared with 63.9 and 44.1 µ g/mL
`tablet, steady state appears to have
`for standard naproxen. The mean
`been reached by day 6.
`plasma fluctuation about the mean was
`The mean plasma profiles of naproxen
`greater for standard naproxen than for
`at steady state (day 8) after oral adminis(cid:173)
`EC naproxen (85.3% vs 49.3 %), while
`tration of standard naproxen and EC
`the mean AUC was smaller (766.8 vs
`naproxen in the fasting state are plotted
`845.0 µ g x h/mL).
`in Figure 1. Figure 2 compares the two
`Table III also shows the ratios of the
`formu lations with respect to 12-hour
`various mean computed variables (EC
`AUCs for each subject.
`naproxen:standard naproxen) and the
`Table III summarizes the computed
`90% confidence intervals for the differ(cid:173)
`variab les at steady-state levels (day
`ence in means, expressed as percent(cid:173)
`8). The plasma half-life averaged
`ages. Based on the 80%: 120% rule for
`16.3 hours after EC naproxen admin(cid:173)
`bioequivalence, EC naproxen was
`istration and 16. 9 hours after standard
`bioequivalent to stan dard naproxen
`naproxen. Mean T max was greater for
`with re spect to half-life , Cmax, Cave,
`EC naproxen than standard naproxen
`Cmax:Cave, and 0- to 12-hour AUC. The
`(4.0 vs 1.9 hours), while Cmax was
`limits for the other computed pharma(cid:173)
`slightly but not significantly s maller
`cokinetic parameters (T max, C1ow, Cmax:
`(94.9 vs 97.4 µg/mL, respectively).
`C1ow, and percent fluctuation) were
`The mean Cave and C.ow for EC na(cid:173)
`not contained within the 80% to 120%
`proxe n were 70.4 and 60.6 µg/mL ,
`interval.
`
`927
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1018 PAGE 7
`
`

`

`

`

`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket