throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
` Paper 39
`
`Entered: June 11, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`POZEN INC. and HORIZON PHARMA USA, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01995
`Patent 9,220,698 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before TONI R. SCHEINER, MICHELLE N. ANKENBRAND, and
`DEBRA L. DENNETT, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`DENNETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Petitioner Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.’s
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Bryan D. Beel and Robert D. Swanson
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-01995
`Patent 9,220,698 B2
`
`
`On April 2, 2018, Petitioner Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Mylan”) filed
`Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Bryan D. Beel (Paper 27) and Robert D.
`Swanson (Paper 28) under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c). The Motions are supported by the
`Declaration of Mr. Beel (Ex. 1048) and the Declaration of Mr. Swanson (Ex.
`1049).
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to admit
`Mr. Beel and Mr. Swanson pro hac vice in the proceeding.
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that Mylan’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Bryan D.
`Beel under to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mylan’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`Robert D. Swanson under to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that, within seven (7) business days of the date of
`this Order, Mylan must submit a Power of Attorney for Mr. Beel and Mr. Swanson
`in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b);
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Beel and Mr. Swanson are authorized to act
`as back-up counsel only, and that Mylan is to continue to have a registered
`practitioner represent it as lead counsel;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mylan must file updated mandatory notices
`identifying Mr. Beel and Mr. Swanson as back-up counsel in accordance with
`37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3);
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Beel and Mr. Swanson are to comply with
`the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials,
`as set forth in Part 42 of 37 C.F.R.; and
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-01995
`Patent 9,220,698 B2
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Beel and Mr. Swanson are to be subject to
`the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101–11.901.
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Brandon M. White
`Emily Greb
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`bmwhite@perkinscoie.com
`egreb@perkinscoie.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Thomas A. Blinka, Ph.D.
`COOLEY LLP
`TBlinka@cooley.com
`Margaret J. Sampson, Ph.D.
`BAKER BOTTS LLP
`Margaret.Sampson@bakerbotts.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket