throbber
10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`________________________________
`HORIZON PHARMA, INC. and POZEN, )
`INC., )
` Plaintiffs. )
` )
`v. )
` )
`DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. )
`and DR REDDY'S LABORATORIES, )
`LTD., )
` Defendants. )
`________________________________)
`
` *** HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ***
`
` October 10, 2014
` New York, New York
` Videotaped deposition of DR. MARK SOSTEK, taken at
`the offices of Morgan Lewis, 1701 Market Street,
`Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103, on Friday, October 10,
`2014, at 8:13 a.m., before Anthony Armstrong, a Realtime
`Systems Administrator, Certified Realtime Reporter,
`Certified Court Reporter and Notary Public of the State of
`New York.
`
`---------------------------------------------------
` DIGITAL EVIDENCE GROUP
` 1726 M Street NW, Suite 1010
` Washington, DC 20036
` (202) 232-0646
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 1 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 2
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
`BUDD LARNER, P.C.
`150 John F. Kennedy Parkway
`Short Hills, New Jersey 07078
`BY: DMITRY V. SHELHOFF, Ph.D., ESQ.,
`(973)379-4800
`dshelhoff@buddlarner.com
`Attorneys for Dr. Reddy's Laboratories
`
`COVINGTON & BURLING, LLP
`1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20004
`BY: EDWARD H. RIPPEY, ESQ.,
`(202)662-5171
`erippey@cov.com
`BY: ASHLEY KWON, ESQ.,
`(202)662-5873
`akwon@cov.com
`BY: P. ANTHONY LOPEZ, ESQ., appearing telephonically
`(202)662-5431
`rlopez@cov.com
`Attorneys for AstraZeneca
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 2 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 3
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S (Cont'd)
`
`PERKINS COIE
`One East Main Street, Suite 201
`Madison, Wisconsin 53703
`BY: MELODY K. GLAZER, ESQ.,
`(608)663-7485
`mglazer@perkinscoie.com
`Attorneys for Mylan
`
`COOLEY, LLP
`3175 Hanover Street
`Palo Alto, California 94304
`BY: RICARDO RODRIGUEZ, ESQ.,
`(650)843-5046
`rr@cooley.com
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs Horizon Pharma
`
`KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 900
`Washington, D.C. 20006
`BY: STEVEN A. MADDOX, ESQ., appearing telephonically
`(202)640-6400
`steve.maddox@knobbe.com
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 3 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 4
`
` I N D E X
`WITNESS DIRECT
`DR. MARK SOSTEK By Mr. Shelhoff 8
` By Ms. Glazer 230
`
` E X H I B I T S
`NUMBER DESCRIPTION PAGE
`DEFENDANTS
`1 Mark Sostek's LinkedIn profile 8
`2 Email from Lori Kreamer 11
`3 Email from Larsson Birgitta to Peter Wallach and 24
` others
`4 US Patent No. 6,356,184 25
`5 US Patent 6,613,354 29
`6 US Patent No. 8,557,285 35
`7 US Patent Application Publication No. US 37
` 2010/0062064
`8 Frequently Asked Questions about PN40020 72
`9 Publication by Christopher J. Hawkey and others 79
`10 US Patent No. 5,601,843 85
`11 ClincialTrials.gov screenshot 91
`12 Multi-page document AZV00000068 to AZV00000154 95
`13 US Patent 5,204,11 98
`14 Document titled Pozen Inc. PN Opportunity 99
`15 May 17, 2006 Pozen New York minutes 114
`16 May 16, 2006 site visit to Pozen headquarters 115
`17 Email chain 126
`18 June 2, 2006 email from Kerstin Rahss to several 144
` people
`19 Document by Lapenna entitled Antioxidant 148
` Properties of Omeprazole
`20 1986 reference by Clissold 151
`21 1988 reference by Koji Takeuchi 152
`22 October 1995 Japanese Journal of Pharmacology 153
`23 1990 reference by T.K. Daneshmend 153
`24 Horizon's Citizen Petition dated February 3, 156
` 2014
`
`1
`
`2
`3
`
`45
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 4 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 5
`
` E X H I B I T S (Cont'd)
`25 A 2010 reference by J.L Goldstein 157
`26 Document entitled Highlights of Prescribing 194
` Information
`27 FDA's response to Horizon's Citizen Petition 197
`28 Excerpt from AstraZeneca's claim construction 201
` presentation
`29 US Patent 6,926,907 214
`30 Article by C. Blandizzi, MD, 1999 220
`31 A reference by Goksel Sener-Muratoglu, 2001 221
`32 Document titled Gastroenterology 221
`33 A reference by S.J. Konturek, 1983 222
`34 A reference by S.J. Konturek, 1984 223
`35 Document entitled Omeprazole Provides Protection 224
` Against Experimentally Induced Gastric Mucosal
` Lesions
`36 A paper by Ohara, 1988 224
`37 Document pertaining to May 9-15, 1987 88th 225
` Annual Meeting of the AGA
`38 Program of the Annual Meeting of the AGA 226
`39 US Patent No. 5,954,124 227
`40 A reference by Yamamoto, 1984 227
`41 Amendment C and Response to Final Office Action 256
`42 Phase 1 study that AstraZeneca conducted 267
`43 US Patent Application Publication - Plachetka 277
`44 May 22, 2006 email from Mark Sostek to Joy 312
` Cmorik
`45 November 10, 2008 email from Carol Bjorkheden 319
`
`1
`
`2
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`6
`7
`
`8
`9
`
`10
`11
`
`12
`13
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 5 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 6
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This is Tape No. 1
` of the video deposition of Mark Sostek,
` taken by the defense, in the matter of
` Horizon Pharma Incorporated, et al. versus
` Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Incorporated, et
` al., in the District Court of Trenton, New
` Jersey, Case No. 3:11-02317 (JAP)(DEA) and
` 3:13-00091 (JAP)(DEA).
` This deposition is being held at 1701
` Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
` 19103, on October 10th, 2014.
` The time on the video screen is
` 8:13 a.m.
` My name is Brian Boyd. I am a legal
` videographer from Digital Evidence Group.
` The court reporter is Anthony
` Armstrong, in association with Digital
` Evidence Group.
` Will counsel please introduce
` themselves for the record.
` MR. SHELHOFF: Dmitry Shelhoff from
` Budd Larner on behalf of Dr. Reddy's
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 6 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 7
`
` Laboratories.
` MS. GLAZER: Melody Glazer from
` Perkins Coie on behalf of the Mylan
` defendant.
` MR. RODRIGUEZ: Ricardo Rodriguez
` from Cooley LLP on behalf of Horizon.
` MS. KWON: Ashley Kwon from Covington
` & Burling on behalf of AZ.
` MR. RIPPEY: Ed Rippey, Covington &
` Burling, on behalf of AZ.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Is there anyone on
` the conference call that needed to identify
` themselves?
` MS. KWON: Hi. We're ready to begin.
` So if the folks on the line could introduce
` themselves.
` MR. LOPEZ: Tony Lopez from Covington
` & Burling.
` MR. MADDOX: Steve Maddox from Knobbe
` Martens.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: And will the court
` reporter please swear in the witness.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 7 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 8
`D R. M A R K S O S T E K, a witness, having first been
` duly sworn, testified as follows:
`DIRECT EXAMINATION
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. Good morning, Dr. Sostek. I'm Dmitry
` Shelhoff. I'll be taking your deposition.
` MR. SHELHOFF: Let's mark Exhibit
` No. 1, Mark Sostek LinkedIn profile.
` (Whereupon, Exhibit No. 1 was
` marked for identification.)
` ************
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. So, Dr. Sostek, in front of you is
` your LinkedIn profile.
` Is that something that's been prepared
` by you?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And does it accurately reflect your
` background and professional experience?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Are there any updates that need to be
` made here, or it's accurate?
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 8 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 9
`
` A. It's accurate.
` Q. So how many years in total have you
` worked for AstraZeneca?
` A. I'm starting my 14th year.
` Q. And what's your area of expertise at
` AstraZeneca?
` MR. RIPPEY: Objection to the form.
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. What do you do at AstraZeneca?
` A. I am in clinical research.
` Q. And you were in clinical research
` when you started?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. And you continue to be in clinical
` research?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Were you involved in
` Omeprazole-Prilosec development?
` A. No.
` Q. Were you involved in
` Esomeprazole-Nexium development?
` MR. RIPPEY: Objection to the form.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 9 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 10
` A. Do you mean prior to its approval in
` the United States?
` Q. Yes.
` A. No.
` Q. Were you involved in
` Esomeprazole-Nexium development after its
` approval in the United States?
` A. Yes.
` Q. What is known as post-approval
` status?
` A. Yes. And other indications of their
` formulations.
` Q. Did you have any involvement with
` different formulations of esomeprazole?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Have you ever seen the patents at
` issue in this case, the '907 patent and the '285
` patent?
` MR. RIPPEY: Objection to the form.
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. Have you seen the '907 patent?
` A. I do not know the patents by their
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 10 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 11
`
` number.
` Q. Okay. Have you seen Pozen's patent?
` MR. RIPPEY: Objection to the form.
` A. I would have to see the specific
` patents you are talking about to answer the
` question.
` Q. Were you involved in European
` proceedings on the Vimovo patents?
` MR. RIPPEY: Objection to form.
` Vague and ambiguous.
` A. Yes. I'm not sure exactly what you
` mean by involved.
` Q. Okay.
` MR. SHELHOFF: So marking Exhibit 2,
` e-mail from Lori Kreamer to multiple people
` at Pozen.
` (Whereupon, Exhibit No. 2 was
` marked for identification.)
` ************
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. Dr. Sostek, I think your microphone
` might have fallen off a little bit. You might
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 11 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 12
`
` want to adjust it.
` THE WITNESS: Can you hear me now
` okay?
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Yes.
` THE WITNESS: Okay. Thank you.
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. So if you look at the bottom of this
` document, I think it's congratulatory e-mail. It
` mentions your name thanking you for support in
` crafting the winning arguments in European
` proceedings. It also says patent team.
` Does this refresh your recollection?
` A. Yes.
` Q. So now that it does, were you
` involved in the Vimovo patent in Europe?
` A. I probably worked with the patent
` attorney Jackie -- Jackie Cohen to help prepare
` for the proceedings that were held in Europe,
` although I did not personally attend those
` proceedings.
` Q. Jackie Cohen is AstraZeneca's inhouse
` attorney -- patent attorney?
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 12 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 13
` A. I don't believe she -- she works at
` AstraZeneca now. She was at the time.
` Q. But in-house at AstraZeneca?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Here in the United States?
` A. Yes.
` Q. How would you define a person of
` ordinary skill in the art in this case?
` MR. RIPPEY: Objection to form. It
` calls for a legal conclusion.
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. Okay. Do you consider yourself to be
` a person of ordinary skill in the art?
` MR. RIPPEY: Same objection. Calls
` for a legal conclusion.
` MR. SHELHOFF: I'll rephrase.
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. Do you understand what I mean when I
` say or make a reference to person of ordinary
` skill in the art?
` A. I'm sorry. I'm having a problem sort
` of understanding your sort of articulation.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 13 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 14
` Could you speak a little slower? I didn't catch
` some of the words.
` Q. Do you understand when I make
` reference to a person of ordinary skill in the
` art?
` MR. RIPPEY: Same objection.
` A. I do not understand that from a legal
` perspective, no.
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. Well, what about your colleagues;
` what kind of people are involved in your work?
` What kind of degrees do they have?
` MR. RIPPEY: Objection to form.
` Calls for speculation.
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. What degree do you have?
` A. A bachelor of arts and a medical
` degree.
` Q. And also do you have Ph.D.'s which
` work with you?
` A. Yes.
` Q. So when did you first hear about
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 14 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 15
`
` Pozen Inc.?
` A. My recollection is sometime in 2006.
` Q. And how did you hear about Pozen
` in 2006?
` A. I believe that someone within the
` organization came to me and told me that
` AstraZeneca had had some preliminary discussions
` with the company Pozen about an inlicensing
` opportunity for a product that Pozen was -- or a
` formulation that they were developing.
` Q. And what do you mean when you say
` "inlicensing opportunity"?
` A. When -- when another company outside
` of AstraZeneca is working on a drug or a
` formulation, it's an opportunity to work with
` that company to form a partnership to jointly
` develop a drug to bring it to market.
` Q. In your experience prior to this
` Pozen inlicensing opportunity and after, did you
` have any other situations where inlicensing
` opportunities arose?
` A. Yes.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 15 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 16
` Q. So the fact that Pozen approached
` AstraZeneca with this --
` THE REPORTER: I'm sorry. I didn't
` catch that, sir.
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. The fact that Pozen approached Astra
` was not in your mind unusual?
` MR. RIPPEY: Objection to the form.
` Q. You may answer.
` A. I do not know if Pozen approached
` AstraZeneca or if AstraZeneca approached Pozen.
` Q. So when you were told about this
` inlicensing opportunity, what did you do?
` A. Well, I was asked if I would be
` willing to get involved with it and take a trip
` down to Chapel Hill and participate in what's
` called due diligence as the clinical
` representative for AstraZeneca to assess the
` product.
` Q. And Chapel Hill, that's in North
` Carolina? That's where Pozen's headquarters are
` located?
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 16 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 17
`
` A. Yes.
` Q. Were you asked at the time to review
` any patents that Pozen's people were inventors
` on?
` A. No.
` Q. And when you went to Pozen's
` headquarters, did they show you any of Pozen's
` patents?
` A. Not me, no.
` Q. Did they show it to any members of
` your team?
` A. I don't know that. I do not know.
` Q. Do you -- do you recall whom did you
` travel with?
` A. It's eight years ago. I remember
` some of the -- some of them. And there were
` two -- two trips, but I can't remember all.
` Q. Do you recall how many people went on
` the first trip?
` A. The first trip I believe it was
` myself and someone named Dave Magner, and there
` may have been one other person. But I think it
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 17 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 18
`
` was just Dave Magner and myself.
` And then the second trip was a larger
` group. And I -- it was probably -- I can't recall
` everyone in that group.
` Q. Does Dave Magner still works at
` AstraZeneca?
` A. No.
` Q. Do you recall when he left?
` A. Not the date or the year. It was
` quite a while ago.
` Q. What was his -- what was his title
` and responsibility in 2006?
` MR. RIPPEY: Objection to the form.
` A. I don't remember what his title was.
` He was in the gastrointestinal therapeutic area.
` And he was a project leader.
` Q. Was he a medical doctor?
` A. No.
` Q. Was he a Ph.D.?
` A. I'm not sure. His area of expertise
` was as a statistician.
` Q. Was he a biostatistician?
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 18 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 19
` A. He was. That was his training.
` Q. Who chose him to go with you on that
` first trip?
` A. I do not --
` MR. RIPPEY: Objection to the form.
` THE WITNESS: Sorry.
` MR. RIPPEY: Go ahead.
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. Did you suggest him to go?
` A. No.
` Q. And during the second trip when you
` had a larger group, do you recall how many people
` were in that group?
` A. I'm going to say between probably six
` and nine.
` Q. And just speaking about the type of
` people who went, can you just characterize like
` the groups of, you know, business people,
` management? That sort of thing.
` MR. RIPPEY: Objection to the form.
` A. Sure. It was a cross-functional
` group. There was a rheumatologist; there would
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 19 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 20
` have been someone from manufacturing or what
` we -- what manufacturing; there would have been a
` statistician; I believe there was someone expert
` in patents, perhaps a patent attorney; there
` would -- was a clinical pharmacologist.
` Those are the ones that I specifically
` recall. There may have been others.
` Q. Was there a formulation expert among
` those?
` A. Yes. Actually, I believe somebody
` named Tommy Anderson was also at that meeting.
` MR. RIPPEY: I want to object to the
` form of the question.
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. Tommy Anderson, was he at the time at
` AstraZeneca's US headquarters?
` A. No.
` Q. Did he come from Sweden?
` A. Yes.
` Q. This cross-functional team, did it
` contain people both from the US and from Sweden?
` A. Yes.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 20 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 21
` Q. Was there anybody else besides Tony
` Anderson from Sweden who was there?
` A. I can't recall.
` Q. And you mentioned -- you mentioned
` the statistician which went along.
` Was that again Dave Magner?
` A. No. I believe it was someone named
` Clara Hwang. H-W-A-N-G.
` Q. You also mentioned the patent expert
` or attorney.
` Do you recall his name?
` MR. RIPPEY: Same objection to form.
` A. I don't recall if it was a man or a
` woman, and I can't remember his or her name.
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. And you also mentioned clinical
` pharmacology person.
` Do you recall who that was?
` A. I'm sorry, I can't remember the name.
` Q. With respect to the clinical type of
` person, were you the only one who would fit that
` profile who went there?
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 21 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 22
` A. No. There was myself and there was
` some -- I was providing gastroenterology and sort
` of acid -- acid suppression expertise. There was
` another physician whose name was Richard Leff,
` L-E-F-F. He was a rheumatologist who worked at
` AstraZeneca.
` Q. So you went there as a
` gastroenterologist?
` A. I went there as someone with
` experience and -- experience and knowledge about
` esomeprazole and about gastric ulcers and about
` the protection against NSAID-induced ulcers.
` Q. By NSAID, you mean non-steroidal
` inflammatory drugs?
` A. Non-steroidal inflammatory drugs,
` yes.
` Q. So you say you were an expert with
` respect to esomeprazole.
` Why don't you mention omeprazole?
` A. Well, I had direct experience working
` on esomeprazole. I believe that I did and still
` do have a very good knowledge base about
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 22 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 23
` omeprazole, but my experience at the company was
` more with esomeprazole.
` Q. And esomeprazole is capital S- an
` antimer of omeprazole, correct?
` THE REPORTER: I'm sorry, sir?
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. Esomeprazole is capital S- an anti
` mir of Omeprazole?
` A. I don't think it's capital. It's
` a -- it's a small case S. An anti mer of
` omeprazole, yeah.
` Q. Prior to 2006, was AstraZeneca
` working on any combination formulations between
` an NSAID and omeprazole or esomeprazole?
` MR. RIPPEY: Objection to form.
` A. To the best of my knowledge, I don't
` think they were working on combination forms.
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. Did AstraZeneca have any patents
` prior to 2001 with respect to combination
` formulations containing a proton pump inhibitor
` and an NSAID?
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 23 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 24
` MR. RIPPEY: Objection to the form.
` A. I don't know.
` (Whereupon, Exhibit No. 3 was
` marked for identification.)
` ************
` MR. SHELHOFF: Marking as Exhibit 3.
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. An e-mail from Larsson Birgitta to
` Peter Wallach and other people, dated
` September 14th, 2005, AZV00389162 to
` AZV00389163.
` MR. RIPPEY: Could I please have a
` copy of that?
` MS. GLAZER: Do you have one more?
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. Do you know who Larsson Birgitta is?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Who is she?
` A. I believe she's a patent attorney who
` was located in Sweden and worked for AstraZeneca.
` She was a senior patent attorney for AstraZeneca
` out of Sweden.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 24 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 25
` Q. Was she -- was she the one who went
` with you on that second trip to Pozen?
` A. I don't believe so.
` Q. So as you can see in this e-mail,
` they mention a couple of AstraZeneca's patent.
` One is US Patent 6365184, and the other one is US
` Patent No. 6613354.
` I'm going to show you those patents.
` (Whereupon, Exhibit No. 4 was
` marked for identification.)
` ************
` MR. SHELHOFF: Marking as Exhibit 4
` US Patent No. 6,365,184.
`BY MR. SHELHOFF:
` Q. Have you ever seen this patent?
` A. No.
` Q. Do you know who Helen Depui is?
` A. No.
` Q. Do you know who Per Lundberg is?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Who is he?
` A. He's a scientist who had worked on
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2014
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Page 25 of 337
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2031
`Mylan v. Pozen
`IPR2017-01995
`
`

`

`10/10/2014
`
`Horizon Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al.
`Highly Confidential
`
`Dr. Mark Sostek
`
`Page 26
` omeprazole for a long time in Sweden, and he was
` a clinical resea

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket