`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________________
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A.,1
`Patent Owner
`
`__________________________
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01993
`U.S. Patent No. 9,414,199
`__________________________
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL HEARING
`
`
`
`
`1 Patent Owner filed an Updated Mandatory Notice indicating that the current owner
`
`of U.S. Patent No. 9,414,199 is Uniloc 2017 LLC. See Paper No. 16.
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01993
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Hearing
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Petitioner respectfully requests oral argument in connection with IPR2017-
`
`01993 for U.S. Patent No. 9,414,199 (“the ’199 Patent”). Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.70, Petitioner specifies the following issues to be argued:
`
`• Grounds for which inter partes review in this proceeding was instituted
`
`and any issue raised in the Board’s Institution Decision, including
`
`interpretation of the claim limitation: “predicting whether the user
`
`device will be at any of the one or more predetermined locations within
`
`the predetermined maximum amount of time …”;
`
`• Any issue addressed in Petitioner’s papers, including the Petition and
`
`Petitioner’s Reply;
`
`• Any issue addressed in Patent Owner’s papers, including Patent
`
`Owner’s Response and Sur-Reply;
`
`• Any issue raised by the Board or Patent Owner at the oral hearing;
`
`• Any other issue raised in papers filed in this proceeding, including
`
`issues raised in correspondence with the Board or papers yet to be filed;
`
`and
`
`• Any other issue that the Board deems necessary for issuing a final
`
`written decision.
`
`1
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01993
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Hearing
`The oral hearing for this proceeding and IPR2017-01993 is currently
`
`scheduled for December 4, 2018. See Paper 11 (Scheduling Order) at 7. Petitioner
`
`requests half of the time that the Board determines is appropriate for oral
`
`argument. Petitioner believes that each side needs no more than 45 minutes, in
`
`aggregate, to present arguments and respond to the Board’s questions.
`
`Petitioner additionally requests that the Board’s staff provide audio-visual
`
`equipment to display demonstrative exhibits, including (a) a monitor or projector
`
`to be connected to a laptop, (b) an ELMO projector, and (c) a projection screen.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: October 23, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ Xin-Yi Zhou
`
`
`
`Xin-Yi Zhou (Reg. No. 63,366)
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01993
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Hearing
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §42.6(e) and §42.105 that on
`
`October 23, 2018, Petitioner’s Request for Oral Hearing was served via email on
`
`Patent Owner’s counsel at the following addresses:
`
`Brett Mangrum
`Etheridge Law Group
`2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Ste. 120-324
`Southlake, TX 76092
`brett@etheridgelaw.com
`James Etheridge
`Etheridge Law Group
`2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Ste. 120-324
`Southlake, TX 76092
`jim@etheridgelaw.com
`
`
`Dated: October 23, 2018
`
`Ryan Loveless
`Etheridge Law Group
`2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Ste. 120-324
`Southlake, TX 76092
`ryan@etheridgelaw.com
`Jeffrey Huang
`Etheridge Law Group
`2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Ste. 120-324
`Southlake, TX 76092
`jeff@etheridgelaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Xin-Yi Zhou
`
`
`
`Xin-Yi Zhou (Reg. No. 63,366)
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
