throbber
1 of 18 DOCUMENTS
`
`The Guardian (London)
`
`August 20, 2003
`
`Celltech hit by failure of Crohns disease drug
`
`BYLINE: Simon Bowers
`
`SECTION: Guardian City Pages, Pg. 14
`
`LENGTH: 391 words
`
`
`
` Celltech, one of Britain's few profitable biotech businesses, yesterday wrote off pounds 7.5m after abandoning its Crohn's disease
`treatment, its most advanced drug in development, 15 months after it was shown to have no discernible benefits for sufferers.
`
`New chief executive Goran Ando yesterday said he had dismissed proposals for the drug - called CDP 571 - to be put through further
`trials in the hope that it could eventually be used to target specific patient groups. Crohn's disease is an increasingly prevalent chronic
`inflammatory bowel condition.
`
`Mr Ando's decision to ditch the drug sharpens the focus on Celltech's successor product, CDP 870, which is expected to enter final
`stage Crohn's patient trials before Christmas. Celltech's CDP 870 development partner Pfizer has already started advanced patient trials
`to discover whether the drug is effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
`
`Jeffrey Holford, an analyst at Citigroup, said: "The majority of Celltech's future growth prospects and valuation resides in its ability to
`develop and commercialise new biotech drugs, (with) CDP 870 remaining the key long-term growth driver.
`
`"Any significant delay (as has already occurred to CDP 571) could result in a significant fall in share price."
`
`CDP 870 is expected to enter a class of rheumatoid arthritis treatments forecast to be worth Dollars 3bn (pounds 1.9bn) by 2006. It is
`also expected to take about half of the market for a class of Crohn's treatments currently worth about Dollars 600m.
`
`The failure of CDP 570 follows a string of disappointing late stage trial results for Crohn's disease therapies. Abbott Laboratories,
`Immunex and a joint venture between Elan and Biogen, are among those to have faced setbacks with Crohn's treatments in recent
`times.
`
`Yesterday Celltech shares fell 16p to 352p, after the company posted a decline in pre-tax profit for the six months to June 30 from
`pounds 11.9m to pounds 2.1m. The drop includes one-off costs of pounds 18.8m, relating mainly to the cost of writing off CDP 570
`and of cutting about 200 jobs, primarily among the group's US sales force.
`
`Commenting on the group's acquisition earlier this year of Oxford GlycoSciences, Celltech finance director Peter Allen said: "We have
`derived a lot of value essentially at no cost at all."
`
`LOAD-DATE: August 20, 2003
`
`LANGUAGE: ENGLISH
`
`Copyright 2003 Guardian Newspapers Limited
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket