throbber
S30
`S30
`
`Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 1993; 52: S30-S38
`Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 1993; 52: S30-S38
`
`A reappraisal of the evidence that rheumatoid
`A reappraisal of the evidence that rheumatoid
`arthritis and several other idiopathic diseases are
`arthritis and several other idiopathic diseases are
`slow bacterial infections
`slow bacterial infections
`
`G A W Rook, P M Lydyard, J L Stanford
`G A W Rook, P M Lydyard, J L Stanford
`
`The
`idea
`that
`several
`'idiopathic'
`or
`The idea that several 'idiopathic' or
`'autoimmune' diseases are in fact caused by
``autoimmune' diseases are in fact caused by
`bacteria, probably related to the mycobacteria,
`bacteria, probably related to the mycobacteria,
`which grow very slowly in the host, has been
`which grow very slowly in the host, has been
`for
`reported
`time.
`some
`The diseases
`reported for some time. The diseases
`concerned are rheumatoid arthritis
`(RA),
`concerned are rheumatoid arthritis (RA),
`sarcoidosis, the inflammatory bowel diseases
`sarcoidosis, the inflammatory bowel diseases
`(Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis), psor-
`(Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis), psor-
`iasis, Takayasu's arteritis, and conceivably,
`iasis, Takayasu's arteritis, and conceivably,
`'giant cell arteritides', such as polymyalgia
``giant cell arteritides', such as polymyalgia
`rheumatica. New data have increased the
`rheumatica. New data have increased the
`appeal of this hypothesis, and technical devel-
`appeal of this hypothesis, and technical devel-
`opments now make it accessible to investi-
`opments now make it accessible to investi-
`gation. The first section of this paper outlines
`gation. The first section of this paper outlines
`features
`the
`of
`accepted
`slow
`bacterial
`the features of accepted slow bacterial
`infections, and points out the parallels with
`infections, and points out the parallels with
`RA, inflammatory bowel disease, and sarcoi-
`RA, inflammatory bowel disease, and sarcoi-
`dosis, including the presence of autoanti-
`dosis, including the presence of autoanti-
`bodies, agalactosyl IgG, and arthritis. The rest
`bodies, agalactosyl IgG, and arthritis. The rest
`of the paper analyses these similarities
`in
`of the paper analyses these similarities in
`greater detail and reviews the evidence for two
`greater detail and reviews the evidence for two
`other crucial points: firstly, that there is altered
`other crucial points: firstly, that there is altered
`responsiveness to mycobacteria in RA (and
`responsiveness to mycobacteria in RA (and
`sarcoidosis); secondly, that mycobacteria can
`sarcoidosis); secondly, that mycobacteria can
`exist in forms which are difficult to detect by
`exist in forms which are difficult to detect by
`histological
`techniques,
`conventional
`and
`conventional histological techniques, and
`difficult to culture, but which are associated
`difficult to culture, but which are associated
`with the 'autoimmune' diseases considered
`with the `autoimmune' diseases considered
`here.
`here.
`
`Slow bacterial infections
`Slow bacterial infections
`Several
`bacterial
`notably
`the
`genera,
`Several bacterial genera, notably the
`spirochaetes (Lyme disease and syphilis) and
`spirochaetes (Lyme disease and syphilis) and
`mycobacteria,
`slowly
`the
`can cause very
`the mycobacteria, can cause very slowly
`characteristically
`evolving
`infections
`with
`evolving infections with characteristically
`varied presentation and complex evolution.
`varied presentation and complex evolution.
`These features are due in part to unexplained
`These features are due in part to unexplained
`tropisms which localise the infection in certain
`tropisms which localise the infection in certain
`sites, and in part to the 'spectrum' of immune
`sites, and in part to the 'spectrum' of immune
`responses which they can evoke. This can be
`responses which they can evoke. This can be
`dominated by T cell activity, as in tuberculoid
`dominated by T cell activity, as in tuberculoid
`or by antibody formation,
`leprosy,
`in
`leprosy, or by antibody formation, as in
`as
`lepromatous leprosy. Moreover, the nature of
`lepromatous leprosy. Moreover, the nature of
`the response can change with time, resulting in
`the response can change with time, resulting in
`extraordinarily complex sequences of
`the
`the extraordinarily complex sequences of
`classically
`manifestations
`in
`clinical
`clinical manifestations classically seen in
`seen
`untreated leprosy or syphilis.
`untreated leprosy or syphilis.
`When the antibody response is dominant
`When the antibody response is dominant
`these infections can be accompanied by a
`these infections can be accompanied by a
`reactive arthritis, by autoantibodies including
`reactive arthritis, by autoantibodies including
`rheumatoid factor, and by strikingly raised
`rheumatoid factor, and by strikingly raised
`immunoglobulin G
`agalactosyl
`of
`levels
`levels of agalactosyl immunoglobulin G
`(Gal(O)). This pattern of disease mimics
`(Gal(0)). This pattern of disease mimics
`features of the 'idiopathic' or 'autoimmune'
`features of the 'idiopathic' or `autoimmune'
`disorders, particularly RA.
`disorders, particularly RA.
`
`When the T cell mediated response is
`When the T cell mediated response is
`prominent in
`slow bacterial
`a
`infection,
`prominent in a slow bacterial infection,
`autoantibody formation can be less striking,
`autoantibody formation can be less striking,
`and the disease process generates T cell
`and the disease process generates T cell
`dependent granulomata with variable degrees
`dependent granulomata with variable degrees
`of central necrosis. This necrosis is seen in
`of central necrosis. This necrosis is seen in
`tuberculosis and in the gumma of tertiary
`tuberculosis and in the gumma of tertiary
`syphilis, and overlap with the histological
`syphilis, and overlap with the histological
`appearance of rheumatoid skin nodules has
`appearance of rheumatoid skin nodules has
`often been noted. However, necrosis is not a
`often been noted. However, necrosis is not a
`feature of infections due to Mycobacterium
`feature of infections due to Mycobacterium
`intracellulare and M malmoense in the cervical
`intracellulare and M malmoense in the cervical
`lymph nodes of children, and the histology of
`lymph nodes of children, and the histology of
`these infections more closely resembles that of
`these infections more closely resembles that of
`sarcoidosis.
`sarcoidosis.
`Slow bacterial infections have a predilection
`Slow bacterial infections have a predilection
`for the lungs (tuberculosis), skin (leprosy, M
`for the lungs (tuberculosis), skin (leprosy, M
`ulcerans, M marinum), and gut. The ability of
`ulcerans, M marinum), and gut. The ability of
`mycobacteria to infect the gut deserves further
`mycobacteria to infect the gut deserves further
`emphasis. Some variants of M avium (myco-
`emphasis. Some variants of M avium (myco-
`bactin dependent), including the organism
`bactin dependent), including the organism
`known as M paratuberculosis, cause a chronic
`known as M paratuberculosis, cause a chronic
`granulomatous intestinal infection in cattle,
`granulomatous intestinal infection in cattle,
`goats, and deer, and recently a similar disease
`goats, and deer, and recently a similar disease
`has been described in monkeys.' With loss of
`has been described in monkeys.' With loss of
`CD4 T cells in HIV infected persons, a limited
`CD4 T cells in HIV infected persons, a limited
`number of serotypes of mycobactin indepen-
`number of serotypes of mycobactin indepen-
`dent M avium can cause similar appearances in
`dent M avium can cause similar appearances in
`the human intestine.2 Such infections with
`the human intestine.' Such infections with
`conventional mycobacteria are in many ways
`conventional mycobacteria are in many ways
`similar to the inflammatory bowel disease
`similar to the inflammatory bowel disease
`spectrum.3 In fact sarcoidosis, Crohn's disease,
`spectrum.' In fact sarcoidosis, Crohn's disease,
`and RA tend, like the established slow bacterial
`and RA tend, like the established slow bacterial
`infections, to affect the lungs, skin, and gut.
`infections, to affect the lungs, skin, and gut.
`Thus although Crohn's disease is an inflam-
`Thus although Crohn's disease is an inflam-
`matory bowel disease, the lung lavages of these
`matory bowel disease, the lung lavages of these
`patients
`grossly abnormal,4 and lung
`are
`patients are grossly abnormal,4 and lung
`damage is a serious complication in some cases
`damage is a serious complication in some cases
`of RA.5 Similarly, there is evidence for gut
`of RA.' Similarly, there is evidence for gut
`abnormalities in sarcoidosis6 and RA,7 and
`abnormalities in sarcoidosis6 and RA,' and
`arthritis can occur in all of these conditions.8 9
`arthritis can occur in all of these conditions.' 9
`It should be stressed that this pattern of disease
`It should be stressed that this pattern of disease
`is quite unlike that seen in the organ specific
`is quite unlike that seen in the organ specific
`disorders of proved autoimmune aetiology
`disorders of proved autoimmune aetiology
`(such as the endocrinopathies or Myasthenia
`(such as the endocrinopathies or Myasthenia
`gravis).
`gravis).
`Whipple's disease is a rare slow bacterial
`Whipple's disease is a rare slow bacterial
`infection which illustrates particularly well the
`infection which illustrates particularly well the
`conceptual and diagnostic dilemma. This
`conceptual and diagnostic dilemma. This
`disease is associated with the presence, within
`disease is associated with the presence, within
`macrophages, of non-cultivable organisms,
`macrophages, of non-cultivable organisms,
`demonstrable by electron microscopy and
`demonstrable by electron microscopy and
`periodic
`acid-Schiff
`by
`the
`sometimes
`sometimes by the periodic acid-Schiff
`technique. The commonest symptoms at
`technique. The commonest symptoms at
`diagnosis are weight loss, diarrhoea, arthral-
`diagnosis are weight loss, diarrhoea, arthral-
`gias, abdominal pain, and skin changes. The
`gias, abdominal pain, and skin changes. The
`
`Department ofMedical
`Department of Medical
`Microbiology,
`Microbiology,
`University College
`University College
`London Medical
`London Medical
`School, London,
`School, London,
`United Kingdom
`United Kingdom
`G A W Rook
`G A W Rook
`J L Stanford
`J L Stanford
`Department of
`Department of
`Immunology,
`Immunology,
`University College
`University College
`London Medical
`London Medical
`School, London,
`School, London,
`United Kingdom
`United Kingdom
`P M Lydyard
`P M Lydyard
`Correspondence to:
`Correspondence to:
`Dr G A W Rook,
`Dr G A W Rook,
`Department of Medical
`Department of Medical
`Microbiology, University
`Microbiology, University
`College London Medical
`College London Medical
`School, 67-73 Riding House
`School, 67-73 Riding House
`St, London W1P 7PP,
`St, London WI P 7PP,
`United Kingdom.
`United Kingdom.
`
`(cid:9)
`

`

`Idiopathic diseases are slow bacterial infections: reappraisal of evidence
`Idiopathic diseases are slow bacterial infections: reappraisal of evidence (cid:9)
`
`S31
`S31
`
`infection progresses so slowly that symptoms
`infection progresses so slowly that symptoms
`can be present for 10 years before a diagnosis
`can be present for 10 years before a diagnosis
`is made. The presentation is very variable, and
`is made. The presentation is very variable, and
`the infection can mimic Crohn's disease or
`the infection can mimic Crohn's disease or
`sarcoidosis,10 or even present as a longstanding
`sarcoidosis," or even present as a longstanding
`seronegative polyarthritis."
`It has recently
`seronegative polyarthritis." It has recently
`been reported that the sequence of the gene
`been reported that the sequence of the gene
`encoding the 16S ribosomal RNA of the
`encoding the 16S ribosomal RNA of the
`organisms from a single case of Whipple's
`organisms from a single case of Whipple's
`disease most closely resembled that found in
`disease most closely resembled that found in
`Rhodococcus, Arthrobacter, and Streptomyces,
`Rhodococcus, Arthrobacter, and Streptomyces,
`and slightly less closely resembled the sequence
`and slightly less closely resembled the sequence
`found in mycobacteria.'2
`found in mycobacteria."
`
`Reactive arthritis
`Reactive arthritis
`As arthritis can occur in RA, Crohn's disease,9
`As arthritis can occur in RA, Crohn's disease,'
`sarcoidosis,8 and psoriasis, it
`is particularly
`sarcoidosis,8 and psoriasis, it is particularly
`important to note that the established slow
`important to note that the established slow
`bacterial infections can also be accompanied by
`bacterial infections can also be accompanied by
`this symptom. This is sometimes owing to
`this symptom. This is sometimes owing to
`direct infection of the joint. Most slow bacterial
`direct infection of the joint. Most slow bacterial
`infections, however, can also be accompanied
`infections, however, can also be accompanied
`by a 'reactive arthritis', similar in some ways to
`by a 'reactive arthritis', similar in some ways to
`transiently
`patients
`that
`in
`and
`seen
`that seen in patients transiently and
`superficially infected in the gut or genitour-
`superficially infected in the gut or genitour-
`inary tract by Yersinia, Chlamydia, Shigella,
`inary tract by Yersinia, Chlamydia, Shigella,
`Salmonella, etc. This kind of arthritis can be the
`Salmonella, etc. This kind of arthritis can be the
`presenting symptom in Whipple's disease,"'
`presenting symptom in Whipple's disease,"
`and it can be seen in a tninority of patients with
`and it can be seen in a minority of patients with
`leprosy,13 14 tuberculosis,15-19 M avium infec-
`leprosy,'3 14 tuberculosis,'5-'" M avium infec-
`or after BCG immunotherapy for
`tion,20
`tion," or after BCG immunotherapy for
`cancer.' 22 It is characteristic of reactive
`characteristic
`cancer.2' 22
`of reactive
`is
`It
`arthritis that the genome of the causative
`arthritis that the genome of the causative
`organism is not present within the joints but
`organism is not present within the joints but
`that the joint contains both antigens derived
`that the joint contains both antigens derived
`from the organism, and T cells responding to
`from the organism, and T cells responding to
`antigens.23-2' T cells responding to
`those
`those antigens.'" T cells responding to
`antigens that are confined to the mycobacteria,
`antigens that are confined to the mycobacteria,
`and to a very closely related genus, are also
`and to a very closely related genus, are also
`found in rheumatoid joints (see below).
`found in rheumatoid joints (see below).
`
`Epidemiology
`Epidemiology
`The epidemiology of sarcoidosis and Crohn's
`The epidemiology of sarcoidosis and Crohn's
`disease points to an environmental factor,27-29
`disease points to an environmental factor,27-29
`likely to be an infection, because there is well
`likely to be an infection, because there is well
`documented clustering in space and time, and
`documented clustering in space and time, and
`geographical variation independent of race.
`geographical variation independent of race.
`The epidemiology of RA is
`less obvious,
`The epidemiology of RA is less obvious,
`though studies of fossil evidence suggest that
`though studies of fossil evidence suggest that
`it is a recent disease, which has behaved like an,
`it is a recent disease, which has behaved like an
`epidemic in the West, but has now reached a
`epidemic in the West, but has now reached a
`peak and may even be declining. Meanwhile,
`peak and may even be declining. Meanwhile,
`there is evidence that a similar epidemic has
`there is evidence that a similar epidemic has
`begun in Africa, where incidence in peoples of
`begun in Africa, where incidence in peoples of
`background
`genetic
`depends
`similar
`on
`similar genetic background depends on
`whether they they live
`in urban or rural
`whether they they live in urban or rural
`environments.
`Similarly, twin concordance
`environments. Similarly, twin concordance
`studies show that RA is about 30% genetic, so
`studies show that RA is about 30% genetic, so
`an environmental factor is involved, and in a
`an environmental factor is involved, and in a
`recent review Silman concludes that this factor
`recent review Silman concludes that this factor
`is most likely to be an infection.30
`is most likely to be an infection.30
`
`Serological changes in patients with
`Serological changes in patients with
`Crohn's disease and RA, and in their
`Crohn's disease and RA, and in their
`spouses
`spouses
`The autoantibodies seen in RA clearly do not
`The autoantibodies seen in RA clearly do not
`constitute evidence that the disease is primarily
`constitute evidence that the disease is primarily
`
`due to autoimmunity. These autoantibodies,
`due to autoimmunity. These autoantibodies,
`including rheumatoid factor, are essentially
`including rheumatoid factor, are essentially
`similar to those seen in the accepted slow
`similar to those seen in the accepted slow
`bacterial infections,3'
`particularly when the
`bacterial infections,' particularly when the
`antibody
`prominent,
`is
`in
`antibody response is prominent, as in
`response
`as
`lepromatous leprosy. It is possible that they
`lepromatous leprosy. It is possible that they
`contribute to immunopathology, but it is no
`contribute to immunopathology, but it is no
`more logical to regard them as the primary
`more logical to regard them as the primary
`problem in RA than it would be in the
`problem in RA than it would be in the
`mycobacterial diseases, unless the greater titres
`mycobacterial diseases, unless the greater titres
`or higher affinities, or both, characteristic of
`or higher affinities, or both, characteristic of
`RA cause them to become pathogenic.
`RA cause them to become pathogenic.
`Interestingly, some of the serological changes
`Interestingly, some of the serological changes
`seen in RA and Crohn's disease provide rather
`seen in RA and Crohn's disease provide rather
`strong evidence for an infectious component.
`strong evidence for an infectious component.
`Lymphocytotoxic activity,
`detected in
`the
`Lymphocytotoxic activity, detected in the
`serum of patients with Crohn's disease, was
`serum of patients with Crohn's disease, was
`also present in the serum of their spouses.32 In
`also present in the serum of their spouses.' In
`addition spouses of patients with RA, like the
`addition spouses of patients with RA, like the
`themselves, have raised
`patients
`levels of
`patients themselves, have raised levels of
`agalactosyl IgG (Gal(0)),33 (discussed further
`agalactosyl IgG (Gal(0)),33 (discussed further
`below), the PR4 idiotype,34 and an apparent
`below), the PR4 idiotype,34 and an apparent
`change in the
`activity of a DNA repair
`change in the activity of a DNA repair
`enzyme.35
`observations
`These
`all
`enzyme.' These observations are all
`are
`compatible with a transmissible agent. Indeed
`compatible with a transmissible agent. Indeed
`they are difficult to explain in any other way.
`they are difficult to explain in any other way.
`
`HLA, sex differences, and spouses
`HLA, sex differences, and spouses
`The findings reviewed in the previous section
`The findings reviewed in the previous section
`imply at first sight that the spouses of patients
`imply at first sight that the spouses of patients
`with RA ought to develop the disease. In fact
`with RA ought to develop the disease. In fact
`there is no reason why this should happen, and
`there is no reason why this should happen, and
`we must distinguish between transmission of
`we must distinguish between transmission of
`an infection and development of the disease.
`an infection and development of the disease.
`Disease is merely one possible outcome of the
`Disease is merely one possible outcome of the
`host/microbe
`relation.
`there
`fact
`In
`host/microbe relation. In fact there are
`are
`numerous reports of Crohn's disease devel-
`numerous reports of Crohn's disease devel-
`oping in spouses, and even sarcoidosis has
`oping in spouses, and even sarcoidosis has
`appeared simultaneously in spouses.36 In RA
`appeared simultaneously in spouses." In RA
`this may not occur because of the HIA
`this may not occur because of the HLA
`associations and sex differences. The spouse
`associations and sex differences. The spouse
`tends to be male and is not necessarily
`tends to be male and is not necessarily
`genetically
`instance, DR4
`(for
`susceptible
`genetically susceptible (for instance, DR4
`positive). Thus even if the agent is transmitted
`positive). Thus even if the agent is transmitted
`to the spouse it need not cause disease.
`to the spouse it need not cause disease.
`Transmission of mycobacterial disease within
`Transmission of mycobacterial disease within
`families can parallel this situation for similar
`families can parallel this situation for similar
`reasons. HLA associations
`also
`occur in
`reasons. HLA associations also occur in
`leprosy (though the relevant haplotypes are
`leprosy (though the relevant haplotypes are
`different),37 and sex differences (F>M) in RA
`different)," and sex differences (F>M) in RA
`are mirrored by the reverse sex difference in
`are mirrored by the reverse sex difference in
`tuberculosis, which is markedly commoner in
`tuberculosis, which is markedly commoner in
`men.
`men.
`
`T cell mediated autoimmunity in RA,
`T cell mediated autoimmunity in RA,
`inflammatory bowel diseases, and
`inflammatory bowel diseases, and
`sarcoidosis
`sarcoidosis
`If neither the arthritis nor the autoantibodies
`If neither the arthritis nor the autoantibodies
`necessarily point to an autoimmune aetiology,
`necessarily point to an autoimmune aetiology,
`can we deduce anything from the T cell
`can we deduce anything from the T cell
`responses in these diseases? There have been
`responses in these diseases? There have been
`extensive searches for autoreactive T cells.
`extensive searches for autoreactive T cells.
`Occasional T cell clones responsive to type II
`Occasional T cell clones responsive to type II
`collagen can be detected in some rheumatoid
`collagen can be detected in some rheumatoid
`synovial
`fluid T cell
`populations.38 Such
`synovial fluid T cell populations.' Such
`reactivity is not present in all patients, however,
`reactivity is not present in all patients, however,
`and can be found in the peripheral blood of
`and can be found in the peripheral blood of
`normal donors.39 Moreover, there is now some
`normal donors." Moreover, there is now some
`
`

`

`S32 (cid:9)
`S32
`
`Rook, Lydyard, Stanford
`Rook, Lydyard, Stanford
`
`doubt about the validity of at least some work
`doubt about the validity of at least some work
`on T cell reactivity to collagen because the
`on T cell reactivity to collagen because the
`pepsin used to prepare it is a potent T cell
`pepsin used to prepare it is a potent T cell
`stimulus and has been shown to account for
`stimulus and has been shown to account for
`much of the apparent reactivity in both murine
`much of the apparent reactivity in both murine
`and human studies.40
`and human studies."
`The possibility that there is autoreactivity to
`The possibility that there is autoreactivity to
`heat shock proteins (hsps) is more difficult to
`heat shock proteins (hsps) is more difficult to
`analyse. There is concrete proof that sequences
`analyse. There is concrete proof that sequences
`derived from the mycobacterial 65 kilodalton
`derived from the mycobacterial 65 kilodalton
`hsp are relevant to most, perhaps all, the
`hsp are relevant to most, perhaps all, the
`rodent models of arthritis,4'-44 so it was logical
`rodent models of arthritis,41-" so it was logical
`to seek evidence for responses to this protein
`to seek evidence for responses to this protein
`in human disease. The data on this point are
`in human disease. The data on this point are
`conflicting, as discussed later, but most authors
`conflicting, as discussed later, but most authors
`agree that there are at least some T cells
`agree that there are at least some T cells
`mycobacterial
`responding
`hsp65
`in
`to
`responding to mycobacterial hsp65 in
`rheumatoid joints. Do any of these T cells also
`rheumatoid joints. Do any of these T cells also
`recognise the human homologue, which is the
`recognise the human homologue, which is the
`60 kilodalton mitochondrial hsp? There are
`60 kilodalton mitochondrial hsp? There are
`reports that some T cells from reactive arthritis
`reports that some T cells from reactive arthritis
`and from juvenile chronic arthritis do indeed
`and from juvenile chronic arthritis do indeed
`have this property, though the frequency of
`have this property, though the frequency of
`such cells is not clear.45 When the epitopes
`such cells is not clear." When the epitopes
`recognised by other clones responding to the
`recognised by other clones responding to the
`mycobacterial hsp65 were studied they turned
`mycobacterial hsp65 were studied they turned
`only
`with
`be
`limited
`sequences
`out
`to
`out to be sequences with only limited
`homology to the human protein.46 These
`homology to the human protein." These
`the corresponding
`clones will respond to
`clones will respond to the corresponding
`human sequence, but only when this is present
`human sequence, but only when this is present
`at high concentrations. At first sight this seems
`at high concentrations. At first sight this seems
`to imply that this cross reactivity is irrelevant,
`to imply that this cross reactivity is irrelevant,
`but recent findings in a quite different model
`but recent findings in a quite different model
`suggest that this conclusion may be premature.
`suggest that this conclusion may be premature.
`A study of the sequence from myelin basic
`A study of the sequence from myelin basic
`protein, which is involved in the pathogenesis
`protein, which is involved in the pathogenesis
`of experimental autoallergic encephalitis in
`of experimental autoallergic encephalitis in
`mice, has shown that the peptide causing
`mice, has shown that the peptide causing
`disease has a remarkably low affinity for the
`disease has a remarkably low affinity for the
`major histocompatibility complex (MHC).
`major histocompatibility complex (MHC).
`Changes to the sequence which increase the
`Changes to the sequence which increase the
`binding to the MHC while conserving the
`binding to the MHC while conserving the
`moieties involved in the interaction with T cells
`moieties involved in the interaction with T cells
`allow the same T cells to recognise a much
`allow the same T cells to recognise a much
`lower concentration of the peptide. However,
`lower concentration of the peptide. However,
`such a peptide, instead of inducing the disease
`such a peptide, instead of inducing the disease
`actually
`readily,
`blocks
`disease
`more readily, actually blocks disease
`more
`induction.47 Presumably this peptide leads to
`induction.' Presumably this peptide leads to
`suppression, inactivation, or elimination of the
`suppression, inactivation, or elimination of the
`it, whereas the
`T cells which recognise
`T cells which recognise it, whereas the
`response to the original peptide, with its low
`response to the original peptide, with its low
`affinity binding to the MHC, escapes the
`affinity binding to the MHC, escapes the
`regulatory
`mechanism.
`relevant
`The
`relevant regulatory mechanism. The
`implications for the hsp60 story are clear. We
`implications for the hsp60 story are clear. We
`cannot dismiss it yet.
`cannot dismiss it yet.
`Another aspect of the hsp60 story is also
`Another aspect of the hsp60 story is also
`suggestive. Several groups have noted that
`suggestive. Several groups have noted that
`murine or human T cell clones or lines
`murine or human T cell clones or lines
`responsive to the human or bacterial hsp may
`responsive to the human or bacterial hsp may
`recognise stressed autologous cells and can
`recognise stressed autologous cells and can
`indeed kill them.48-51 This implies that the
`indeed kill them."' This implies that the
`mitochondrial hsp60 can be processed and that
`mitochondrial hsp60 can be processed and that
`cross reactive peptides can be presented. This
`cross reactive peptides can be presented. This
`may well be a physiological mechanism with
`may well be a physiological mechanism with
`some as yet obscure regulatory role. At present
`some as yet obscure regulatory role. At present
`we are unaware of any studies aimed at finding
`we are unaware of any studies aimed at finding
`out whether hsp65 reactive T cells from
`out whether hsp65 reactive T cells from
`patients with tuberculosis or leprosy are also
`patients with tuberculosis or leprosy are also
`able to recognise such stressed cells in the
`able to recognise such stressed cells in the
`absence of external antigen. If, as we predict,
`absence of external antigen. If, as we predict,
`
`they can do so, it will be difficult to claim that
`they can do so, it will be difficult to claim that
`this mechanism is specific for RA, or a primary
`this mechanism is specific for RA, or a primary
`event in its pathogenesis.
`event in its pathogenesis.
`The complexity of the hsp60 story has been
`The complexity of the hsp60 story has been
`further increased by a series of publications
`further increased by a series of publications
`claiming that cells can express not just MHC
`claiming that cells can express not just MHC
`bound peptides derived from the hsp60 but
`bound peptides derived from the hsp60 but
`even macromolecular forms detectable with a
`even macromolecular forms detectable with a
`variety
`polyclonal
`of
`monoclonal
`and
`variety of polyclonal and monoclonal
`the
`antibodies
`mycobacterial52
`antibodies to the mycobacterial" or
`to
`or
`mammalian homologues.53 54 Whereas this
`mammalian homologues." 54 Whereas this
`work certainly suggests that something cross
`work certainly suggests that something cross
`reactive with this family of hsps can appear on
`reactive with this family of hsps can appear on
`mammalian cell membranes, there
`is no
`mammalian cell membranes, there is no
`evidence that this is in fact the hsp60. Indeed
`evidence that this is in fact the hsp60. Indeed
`the monoclonal antibody ML30 used in some
`the monoclonal antibody ML30 used in some
`of these studies binds to numerous mammalian
`of these studies binds to numerous mammalian
`constituents. Nevertheless, a cross reactive
`constituents. Nevertheless, a cross reactive
`molecule may be relevant, and its identification
`molecule may be relevant, and its identification
`is awaited with interest.
`is awaited with interest.
`Thus although there are several 'loose ends',
`Thus although there are several 'loose ends',
`particularly in relation to the role of hsps as
`particularly in relation to the role of hsps as
`autoantigens, there is no evidence that there
`autoantigens, there is no evidence that there
`are autoimmune manifestations in RA which
`are autoimmune manifestations in RA which
`are not routinely
`in slow bacterial
`are not routinely seen in slow bacterial
`seen
`infections, with perhaps the exception ofhigher
`infections, with perhaps the exception of higher
`affinity self reactive antibodies.
`affinity self reactive antibodies.
`
`Second signals and autoreactive T cells
`Second signals and autoreactive T cells
`An unresolved theoretical issue is relevant
`An unresolved theoretical issue is relevant
`here. It is not clear that autoreactive T cells can
`here. It is not clear that autoreactive T cells can
`function in the absence of a 'second signal'.55
`function in the absence of a 'second signor."
`This second signal may be provided by those
`This second signal may be provided by those
`microbial components which are recognised
`microbial components which are recognised
`independently of the receptors on T cells and
`independently of the receptors on T cells and
`B cells. These components include glycolipids,
`B cells. These components include glycolipids,
`polyanions, peptidoglycans, formyl peptides,
`polyanions, peptidoglycans, formyl peptides,
`mannans, glucans, etc, and constitute the
`mannans, glucans, etc, and constitute the
`'adjuvant' components without which most
``adjuvant' components without which most
`animal models of autoreactivity cannot be
`animal models of autoreactivity cannot be
`elicited. This requirement for a second signal
`elicited. This requirement for a second signal
`ensures that potentially autoreactive responses
`ensures that potentially autoreactive responses
`are activated only when an infectious agent is
`are activated only when an infectious agent is
`present, and may even allow the immune
`present, and may even allow the immune
`elementary
`perform
`response to perform some elementary
`some
`response
`to
`'taxonomy', and so activate the mechanism
``taxonomy', and so activate the mechanism
`appropriate for the organism in question.56
`appropriate for the organism in question."
`Does sustained T cell autoreactivity occur
`Does sustained T cell autoreactivity occur
`without the continuing presence of mic

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket