throbber
(cid:9) (cid:9)
`
`Senior Vice President, Directory Services: Paul Walsh
`
`Vice President, Sales and Marketing: Dikran N. Barsamian
`National Sales Manager, Custom Sales: Anthony Sorce
`Senior Account Manager: Frank Karkowsky
`Account Managers:
`Marion Gray, RPh
`Lawrence C. Keary
`Suzanne E. Yarrow, RN
`National Sales Manager, Medical Economics Trade Sales:
`Bill Gaffney
`Senior Business Manager: Mark S. Ritchin
`Financial Analyst: Wayne M. Soltis
`Vice President, Clinical Communications and
`New Business Development: Mukesh Mehta, RPh
`New Business Development Manager: Jeffrey D. Dubin
`Manager, Drug Information Services: Thomas Fleming, RPh
`Drug information Specialists: Maria Deutsch, MS, PharmD, CDE:
`Christine Wyblo, PharmD
`Editor, Directory Services: David W. Sifton
`Project Manager: Edward P. Connor
`
`Senior Associate Editor: Lori Murray
`Assistant Editor: Gwynned L. Kelly
`Director of Direct Marketing: Michael Bennett
`Direct Mall Manager: Lorraine M. Loening
`Senior Marketing Analyst: Dina A. Maeder
`Director of Production: Carrie Williams
`Data Manager: Jeffrey D. Schaefer
`Production Manager: Amy Brooks
`Production Coordinators: Gianna Caradonna, Dee Ann DeRuvo,
`Melissa Katz
`index Supervisor: Johanna M. Mazur
`Index Editor: Shannon Reilly
`Art Associate: Joan K. Akerlind
`Digital Imaging Supervisor: Shawn W. Cahill
`Digital Imaging Coordinator: Frank J. McElroy, Ill
`Pharmaceutical Coordinator: Mary Kaadan
`Electronic Publishing Designer: Livia Udine
`Fulfillment Managers: Louis J, Bolcik, Stephanie DeNardi
`
`EDITION
`
`PDV
`55
`2001
`YS C ANS
`DTSK
`RI- NC
`
`MEDICAL ECONOMICS Copyright 2001 and published by Medical Economics Company, Inc. at Montvale, NJ 07645-1742. All rights reserved. None of
`the content of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, resold, redistributed, or transmitted in any form or
`by any moans (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the publisher
`THOMSON HEALTHCARE
`PHYSICIANS' DESK REFERENCE, PDfr, Pocket PDR', The POW Family Guide to Prescription Drugs', The PDR' Family
`GuitIS to Women's Haeilli and Prescription Drugs', /Intl Tna POW Family. Guide to Ntitrillen and Hea1111' aro registered trademarks used herein under license. PDFt for
`Ophthalmic Marileinosfm. FOR for Nonpresoription Drugs and Dietary suppramentarm, Port Companion Guide". PDR PharrnacopoeiaTM Pucka! Edition, FOR° for Herbal
`Maolcines'm, FOR for Nuiritionel Supplements'TM, MDR' Medical Dictionarymf, POW Nurse's Drug Handbooks'. PDFr .Nurse's Drctionary'm, The FOR' Family Guide
`EficYcloPsdla of MediCal Care'"', The PDR` Family Guide to Natural fvlethcines and Healing Thorapiesm, Ina POR' Family Guide to Common Fkilmsritem, The PM' Family
`Guide to Over-the•Counter DrugaTM, and FOR' EleCtronio tibraryTM ate trademarks used heroin under license.
`
`lode. 1,,esirrent, New Ateclia; . Suzanne BeDell; Vice Pi (•,:i,(.1,1, Corporate Haman
`0.1liceis of Mealcul fir:enemies Company:Prof4deni and allef Executive Officer: Curtis B. (cid:9)
`1,,111101.1 M Rn.sir, Chief Finarroi/r/ Officar: Christopher Carldi; Vica Pres/dent and Coniroll.'r; B; any Gray, Or:i, Pro,snitalt, Finance: Donna (cid:9)
`wee pregittent,
`Senior Vice President, Operations: John N. Ware
`hriViCO3 (cid:9)
`
`Ex. 1007 - Page 1
`
`

`

`.CENT.00ORPI085
`
`recommended doses of 3 mg/kg in rheumatoid arthritis and
`5 mg/kg in Crolink disease indicate that the terminal half-
`life of infliximeh is 8.0 to 9.5 days.
`Following an initial dose of REMICADE, repeated in regent;
`at 2 arid 6 weeks in fistulizing CrOhn's disease and rhourtia.
`tuid arthritis patients remitted in predictable concentratien-
`time profiles following each treatment. No systemic accu-
`mulation of inffiximrsh octurred upon continutal repeated
`treatment with '3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg at 4- or 8-reek inter-
`vals in rheumatoid arthntia patients or patients with mod-
`erate or severe Crohn's disease retreated with 4 infusions of
`10 tng/kg REMICADE at 8-week intervals. No major differ-
`ences in clearance or volume of distribution were observed
`in patient subgroups defined by age or weighL It is not
`known if there are differences in clearance or volume of dis-
`tribution between gender subgroups. or in patients with
`marked impairment of hepatic or renal functien.
`CLINICAL STUDIES
`Rheumatoid Arthritis
`The safety and efficacy of REMICADE when given in con-
`junction with methotrexitte (MIX) were asseseed in a mul-
`ticenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
`of 429 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite
`treatment with M'I'X (the A nti-TNE (cid:9)
`i n'Elimintatoid At-
`thnto with Concomitant Therapy or ATTRACT). The me-
`dian age of patients unrolled was 54 years, with a median
`duration of disease of 8.4 years sad a median number of
`swollen and tender joints of 20 and 31 respectively All pa-
`tients were to have received MIX for 6 menthe and be on
`atablo dose -1". 12.5 ing/week for 4 weeks prior to study. All
`REMICADIe and placebo grimes continued their xtable dose
`of MIX and folic and.
`In addition to MTX, patients received placebo, 3 mg/kg ur 10
`mg/kg of REMICADE by intravenous infusion at weeks 0, 2
`and 6 followed by additional infusions every four or eight
`weeks thereafter Concurrent use of arable doses of arnica-tr.
`ticosteroids (10 mg/day) and/or nonsteioidal anti-inflamma-
`tory drugs was also permitted. The primary endpoint was
`the proportion of patients at week 30 who attained an im-
`provement in signs end symptoms as mongered by the
`American College of Ilheunintnlogy criteria, (ACR 20). An
`ACR 20 response is defined as at lanai. la 20% improvement
`in both lender end swollen joint iminte and in 3 of the fol-
`lowing 5 criteria. physician global assessment, pntlent
`global aseessinent, fenctional/dittahility measure, visual an-
`alog pain orate and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESE) or
`CRP
`At week 30, 43/88 (50%) or patients treated every &weeks
`with 3 mg/leg of REMICADE plus MTX attained an ACE 20
`compared with 18/3'48120961 of pntients treated with placebo
`plus MIX (p<0.0011. Higher doses nnil/or mere frequent ad-
`ministrntiona did not result in higher response rates. Re-
`sults are shown in Figure 1.
`
`% Patients Responding
`
`Weeks
`
`-0-- rawe.e. -0-- 3 inks o e wks -171- 10 meere Ake
`-A- 3 rnotlig q a wka --M- 10 rnsea2 q 4 wk.
`
`AS Weeps received concomitant melhotresale
`
`ire 1, Percentage of Patients who Achieved an ACR 20,
`
`At week 30; the ACE 50 response was 27% for patients
`treated with 3 mg/kg REMICADE (infliximab) 'every 8
`weeks plus MTX, compared to 5% for patients treated with
`placebo plus MTX (p•,.0 001). Tho ACE 70 response woe 8%
`for patients treated with 3 ing/ke REMICADE every
`weeks plan MIX and 0% for patients treated with placebo
`0115 MTX, Patients receiving :1 nig/kg REMICADE every 8
`weeks doinonstratiul superior improvement in all ACE re-
`sponse components except HAQ compared to patients
`treated with placebo plus MIX (Table 1). Data on use of
`REMICADE without concurrent MTX are limited (see PRE-
`CAUTIONS, Intmurrogenicity)P
`(See table 1 at top of next page]
`Active Crohn's Disease
`The safety and efficacy of REMICADE were assessed in a
`randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose ranging
`study of 108.patients with moderate to severe active Crohn's
`dleelleee (Cretin's Disease Activity Index (CDAl)
`:a.2204001. All patients had experienced an inadequate re-
`sponge to prior cenviiiitional therripies, including certain.
`teraids (60% of patients), 5-amlnenancylates (5-ASA) (60%)
`andlor 6.increnptopunne/arathioprine I6-MP/AZ/0 (37%1.
`Cuncurrent use of stable dose regimens. of corticosteroids,
`5.ASA, 6-M1' nnii/or AZA was permi tted and yr, orpattents
`continued to receive at least unit of thmirriediratinus
`The study was divided into three phases. In the first pliase,
`patients were randomized to receive a single intravenous
`
`Continued on next page
`
`Consult 20 01 PIM supplements and future editions for revisions
`
`Centocor, Inc.
`200 GREAT VALLEY PARKWAY
`MALVERN, PA 19355
`
`Direct General Inquiries to:
`Ph: (610) 651-6000
`(888) 874-3083
`Fax (610) 651-6100
`Medical Emergency Contact:
`Ph: 1-800-457-6399
`For Medical Information/Adverse Experience Reporting
`Contact:
`Medical Information & Product Surveillance
`Ph: (800) 457-6399
`Fax: (610) 651-6197
`
`REMICADE®
`INFLIXIMAB
`recombinant
`For IV Injection
`
`DESCRIPTION
`REM1CADE8! (inffinraati) IS a chimeric IgGI, ninnuelonal
`antibody with an appruximate molecular weight of 149,100
`&ikons. It is composed of human constant and murine vari-
`able regions. Inlliximab binds epticifically to human tumor
`necrosis factor alpha (TN Fo) with an association constant of
`1010 (cid:9)
`Infliximeb is produced by a recombinant cell lure
`cultured by continuous perfusion and is purified by a aeries
`of steps that includes measures to inectivate arid 'remove
`viruses.
`REMICADE is supplied as a sterile, white, lyophilized pow-
`der for intravenous infusion. ',gnawing reeonstitution with
`10 mf. of Sterile Water fur Injection, OSP the resulting pH
`is approximately 7.2. Each eingleuse vial contains 100 mg
`inffiximeb, 500 rag sucrose, 0.5 mg polysnrbate 80, 2,2 mg
`monobasic sodium phosphate and 6.1 mg dibasic sodium
`phosphate. No preservatives are present.
`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`General
`InIfiximab neutralizes the biological activity of TNFo by,
`binding with high affinity to the soluble and transmem-
`brane forms of TNFo and inhibits binding nr 'MA/ with its
`ronapters." Infliximab does not neutralize INNIS (lymptio.
`toxin a), a related cytokine that Utilizes the same receptor/I
`us 1'We. Biological. activities nttributed to TNFili include:
`induction of pro.inllanunatory cytokines such aa IL-I, and
`IL-6, enhancement of- leukocyte mtgration by increasing en•
`dothelial layer permeability and expression of ndliepion
`molecules by endothelial cello and leukocytes, activation of
`noutruphil and easinophil functional activity, induction of
`acute phase reactants and other liver proteins, as well as
`tissue degrading enzymes produced by aynovietyteri and/or
`chondroeytes Cells expressing traneinembrane TNFo
`bound by ifilliximah can be lysed in stem by complement or
`effector cells.' Infliximab inhibits the functional activity of
`INF. rn a wide variety of in vitro bioaseuye uti lining human
`fibroblasts, endothelial cells, neutrophila;3 B and T lynipho.
`cytes and epithelial cells. Anti-TNFo antibodies reduce dis-
`ease activity in the cotton-top tamarin colitis model. and de.
`cream syneyitie and joint erosions in a marine niedel of col-
`lagen-induced arthritis Infliximab prevents disease in
`transgenic mice that develop polyarthritis as a result of con-
`stitutive exproosion of human TNFo, and, when adminis-
`tered after disease onset, allows eroded Joints to heal..
`Pharmacodynamics
`Elevated concentrations of TNFo have been found in the
`joints of rheumatoid arthritis •patientss and the stools of
`Crohn's diseute patients' and correlate with elevated dis-
`ease activity. In Crohn's disease, treatment with REM!,
`CADE reduced infiltration of inflammatery mils. and TNEn
`production in inflamed ;trees of the intestine, and reduced
`the proportion of mo Min uclear cella from the lamina propria
`nide to express. 174Fa and interferon .1. 4 In rheumatoid ar-
`thritis, treatment with REMICADE reduced infiltration of
`Inflammatory cells into inflamed areas of the joint as well as
`eX131'ASSAltl.ef moleculee mediating cellular Adhesion I E.
`selector, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and
`vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VC:AM-DI, chemoattraa
`lion linterlookin 8 (11.-81 and monoeyte chemetactic protem
`(MCP-Ill mid tiaouo degrarIntion luintris midalloproteinase
`(MMP) 1 and 31.1 After treatment with REMICADE, pa-
`tients with Crohn'a disease or rheumatoid arthritic extol).
`Red decreased levels of serum inlerleulun 6 (ILef)) and C•
`rometivir protein (CRP) imnipared to baseline. Peripheral
`Mood lymphocytes from REMICADE-treated patients
`showed no significant decrease in number or in proliferative
`responses to to ogre mitogenic stmailation when compared
`to cella front untreated patients.
`Pharmacokinetics
`Single intravenous infusions of 1 to 20 niginig showed a pre-
`dictable and linear relationship between the dose adminis-
`tered and the maximum serum concentration and area un-
`der the concentration-time curve The volume of distribu-
`tion at steady state was independent of dose and indicated
`that infliximab was distributed primarily within the vascu•
`lar compartment. Median pharmacokinetic results for the
`
`:(Ni-Uttivimi 'Lily . (cid:9)
`
`t IV;
`
`gai
`
`7.
`
`INFil
`
`8
`
`I understand that Ttinom[ua (thalid-
`
`omide) will be prescribed'ONLY for me in
`must NOT share it with ANYONE, even
`someone who has symptoms similar to •
`mine. It must be kept out of the reach of
`children and should never be given to
`women who are able to have children.
`I have read the THALOMID® (thalido-
`mide) patient brochure and/or viewed the
`videotape, 'Important Information for
`Men and Women Taking THALOMID®
`(thalidomide)". I understand the con-
`tents, including other possible health
`problems from THALOMID® (thalido-
`mide), so-called "side effects". I know that
`I cannot donate bloOd or semen while tak-
`ing THALOMID®.(thalidomide). ,
`My doctor has answered any questions I
`have asked,
`I tinderstand that I moat participate in a
`roomy and patient registry while I am on
`'THALOMID® (thalidomide), which will
`require completing additional forms.
`
`Authorization:
`This information has been read aloud to me in the lan-
`guage of my choice. I -understand thatlf I do not follow
`all of my doctor's instructions, I will not be able to re-
`Mille TliALOMID® (thalidomide) I now authorize my
`- deafer to begin my treatment with THALOMID®
`(thalidomide).
`
`Patient Name (cid:9)
`(please print) (cid:9)
`
`Social Security No. (cid:9)
`(Only last six (cid:9)
`digits required)
`
`Date of Birth
`(mo./day/yr.)
`
`•
`
`Date
`Patient, Parent/ (cid:9)
`(ma/day/yr.)
`Guardian Signature (cid:9)
`I hoes fully explained to the patient the nature, pur-
`re, and risks of the treatment described above, espe-
`cially the risks to women of childbearing potential. I
`have asked the patient if olw/be has arty questions re-
`garding lier/hie treatment with THALOMID® (thalido.
``iiiide) and have answered those questions to the beat of
`My ability. I will ensure that tile appropriate amigo.
`etifitsef the patient consent form are completed. In ad-
`dition, I will comply with all of my obligations and re-
`sponsibilities as a prescriber registered under the
`S.T.E.PS ". restricted distribution program.
`
`•
`',Physician Name (cid:9)
`• (please print)
`
`Physician Signature (cid:9)
`
`DEA No.
`
`Date
`(mo /day/yr.)
`
`REFERENCES
`L Manson JM. 1986. Teratogenicity. Cassarett and Doull's
`Tbsicology: The Basic Science of Poisons. Third Edition,
`Pages 195-220. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.
`2. Smithels RW and Newman CG. 1992. J. Med. Genet.
`29(10):716-723.
`3. Sampaio EP Kaplan G, Miranda A, et al. 1993. J. Infect.
`Dis. 168(21:408-414.
`4. Sarno EN, Gran GE, Vieira LM, et al. 1991, Clin. Exp.
`Immunol: 84,108-108.
`5. Sampaio EP, Moreire AL, Sarno EN, et al. 1992. J. Exp.
`Med. 175:1729-1737.
`6 Nogueira AC, Neubert It, Helge H, et a/. 1994. Life Sci-
`ences 551.2k77-92.
`7. Jacobson .1M, Greenspan .15, Spritzler J, et at. 1997.
`Now Eng..1. Med 336(21)44M-1493.
`8. 8thiminker 1-1, Smith EL, and Williams RT. 1965. Br. J.
`Miami/not 26;324-337.
`9 lyer CGS, leartgniilon J, Ramanujam K, et al. 1971. Bull.
`WHO. 45:719-732.
`10. Sheskin J and Convit J. 1969 Intl. J. Leprosy. 37:135-
`146.
`11. Waters MFR. 1971. Lepr. Rev. 42:26-42,
`12. Unpublished data, on file at Celgeite.
`TEALII.003 11/99 CO
`Sharon in Product Identification Guide, page 310
`
`For EMERGENCY telephone numbers,
`consult the Manufacturers' Index
`
`Ex. 1007 - Page 2
`
`

`

`1086/CENTOCOR
`
`PHYSICIANS' DESK REFERENCE®
`
`Remicade--Cont.
`
`Table 1
`
`MEDIAN VALUES AT EASELINE & WEEK 30 FOR ACR COMPONENTS
`3 tneekg q 8 wks
`REMICADE + MTX
`Baseline
`30 weeks
`32
`12
`19
`9
`7.0
`3.8
`6.1
`2.6
`6.6
`3.6
`1.8
`1.5
`0.8
`3.1
`40
`24
`
`Placebo + MTX
`Baseline
`30 weeks
`24
`16
`, 19
`13
`6,7
`5.9
`6.5
`5.0
`6.2
`5.5
`1.8.
`1.5
`2.3
`35
`
`39
`
`Parameter
`No. of Tender Joints
`No. of Swollen Joints
`Pain°
`Physician's Global Assessment'
`Patient's Global Assessment'
`Disability Index (HAQ)b
`CRP (mg/dL)
`ESR
`
`Visual Analog. Scale (0=beat, 10aworst)
`Health Assessment Questionnaire, measurement of 8 categories: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, by.
`giene, reach, grip, and activities
`
`(IV) dose of placebo. 5, 10 or 20 nig/kg of REMICADE. The
`prinuiryandpoint was the proportion of patients who expe-
`rionced &clinical response, defined as a decrease in CDAI by
`a-70 points from baseline at the 4-week evaluation and
`without an increase in Crohn's disease medications ur sur-
`gery for Crohn's disease, Patients who responded at week 4
`warn followed to week 12. Secondary endpoints included the
`proportion of patients who ware in clinical remission at
`week 4 (CDAI <150), and clinical response over time.
`At week 4, four of twenty-6,-1e (16%) of the placebo patients
`achieved a clinical response vs. twenty-two of twenty-seven
`(82%) of the patients receiving 5 mg/kg REMICADE
`(p < 0.001, two-sided. Fisher's Exact teat). One of twenty.
`five (4%) placebo patients and thirteen of twenty-seven
`(48%) patients receiving 5 ing/kg REMICADE achieved a
`CDAI <150 at week 4. The maximum response to any dom
`of REMICADE was observed within 2 to 4 weeks. The pro-
`portion of patients responding gradually diminished over
`the 12 weeks of the evaluation period. There was no evi-
`dence of a dose response; doses higher than 5 mg/kg did not
`result in, a greater proportion of responders. Results are
`shown in Figure 2
`
`is
`
`100
`
`75
`
`se'
`
`26
`
`0
`Weak 0
`labolon
`
`-0- Placebo (n e 25) (cid:9)
`5 mg/kg In 27) (cid:9)
`-
`
`-a- 10 mgem (n.20)
`- 20 mew (n 25)
`
`Figure 2. Response (z70 point decrease in CIA)) to a Single
`IV REMICADE or Placebo Dose.
`
`During the 12-week period following infusion, patients
`treated with REMICADE compared to placebo demon-
`strated improvement in outcomes measured by the Inflam-
`matory flaws! Disease Questionnaire.
`In the second phase, 29 patients who did not respond to the
`single dose of 0. 10 or 20 mg/kg of REMICADE entered the
`open label phase and received a single 10 mg/kg dose of
`REMICADE 4 weeks after the initial dose. 'fbn of twenty-
`nine (34%) patients experienced a response 4 weeks after
`receiving the second dose.
`Patients who remained in clinical response at week 8 during
`the first or second phase were eligible for the retreatment
`phase. Seventy-three patients were re-randomized at week
`12 to receive 4 infusions of placebo or 10 mg/kg REMICADE
`at 8-week intervals (weeks 12, 20, 28, 36) and were followed
`to week 48. In the limited data set available, no significant
`differences were observed between the REMICADE and pla-
`cebo re-treated groups.
`Fistulizing Crohn's Disease
`The safety and efficacy of REMICADE were assessed in a
`randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study of 94 pa-
`tients with fistglising Crohn'n disease with fistula(s) that
`were of at least 3 months duration.10 Concurrent use °rata-
`ble doses of corticosteroids, 5-ASA, antibiotics, MTX, 6-MP
`and/or AZA was permitted, and 83% of patients continued to
`receive at least one of these medications. Fifty-two (55%)
`had multiple cutaneously draining fistulas, 90% of patients
`had fistula(s) in the perianal area and 10% had abdominal
`fistula(s).
`Patients received 3 doses of placebo, 5 or 10 mg/kg REMI-
`CADE at weeks 0, 2 and 6 and were followed up to 26
`weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patinae
`who experienced a clinical response, defined as a-50% reduc-
`tion from baseline in the number of fistula(s) draining upon
`gentle compression. on at least two consecutive visits, with-
`out an increase in medication or surgery for Crohn's dis-
`ease.
`Eight of thirty-one (26%) patients in the placeltu non
`achieved a clinical response vs. twenty-one of the thirty-one
`(68%) patients in the 5 metig REMICADE arm (II = 0.002,
`two-sided, Fisher's Exact test). Eighteen of thirty-two (56%)
`patients in the II mg/kg arm achieved a clinical response.
`The median time to onset of response in the REMICADE-
`treated group was 2 weeks The median duration of re-
`sponse was 12 weeks; niter 22.weeks there was no difference
`between either dose of REMICADE and placebo in the pro-
`portion of patients in response (Figure 3). New fistula(s) de-
`veloped in approximately 15% of both REMICADE and pla-
`cebo-treated patients.
`ISae figure 3 in next column]
`Seven of sixty (12%) evaluable REMICADE-treated pa-
`tients, compared to one of thirty-one (3.5%) placebo-treated
`patients, developed an abscess in the area of listulas be-
`tween 6 and 16 weeks after the last infusion of REMICADE.
`Six of the REMICADE patients who developed an abscess
`had experienced a clinical response (see ADVERSE REAC-
`TIONS, Infections).
`
`-0- Raabe (cid:9)
`
`5 apeto --•- marine
`
`Figure 3. Response thrtilla(s) dowel wilh Three Doses of REMICAOF
`or Placebo.
`
`•
`
`Dose regimens other than dosing at weeks 0, 2 and 6 have
`not been studied. Studies have not been done to assess the
`effects of REMICADE on healing of the internal fistular ca-
`nal, on closure of non-cutaneously draining fistulas (e.g., en-
`tero-entero), or on cutaneously draining fistulas in locations
`other than perianal and periabdominal.
`
`INDICATIONS AND USAGE
`Rheumatoid Arthritis
`IfERICADE, in combination with methotrexate, is indi-
`cated for the reduction in signs and symptoms of [banns,
`toid arthritis in patients who have had an inadequate re-
`sponse to methotrexate.
`•
`Crohn's Disease (cid:9)
`REMICADE is indicated for the reduction in signs- and
`symptoms of Crohn's disease in patients with moderately to
`severely active Crohn's disease who have had an inadequate
`response to conventional therapy.
`The safety and efficacy of therapy continued beyond a sin-
`gle dose have not been established (see DOSAGE AND
`ADMINISTRATION).
`REMICADE is indicated for the reduction in the number of
`draining enterocutaneous fistulae in patients with' fistuliz-
`ing Crohn's disease.
`The safety and efficacy of therapy continued beyond three
`doses have not been studied (see DOSAGE AND ADMIN-
`ISTRATION).
`
`CONTRAINDICATIONS
`REMICADE should not be administered to patients with
`known hypersensitivity to any murine proteins or other;
`component of the product.
`
`WARNINGS
`RISK OF INFECTIONS
`SERIOUS INFECTIONS, INCLUDING SEPSIS AND FATAL IN-
`FECTIONS, HAVE BEEN REPORTED IN PATIENTS RECEIV:
`ING TNF-BLOCKING AGENTS. MANY OF THE SERIOUS IN
`FECTIONS IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH REMICADE HAVE
`OCCURRED IN PATIENTS ON CONCOMITANT IMMUNO-
`SUPPRESSIVE THERAPY THAT. IN ADDITION TO THEIR
`CROHN'S DISEASE OR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS, COULD
`PREDISPOSE THEM TO INFECTIONS. CAUTION SHOULD
`BE EXERCISED WHEN CONSIDERING THE USE OF REMI-
`CADE IN PATIENTS WITH A CHRONIC INFECTION OR A
`HISTORY OF RECURRENT INFECTION. REMICADE SHOULD
`NOT BE GIVEN TO PATIENTS WITH A CLINICALLY IMPOR-
`TANT, ACTIVE INFECTION. PATIENTS WHO DEVELOP A
`NEW INFECTION WHILE UNDERGOING TREATMENT WITH
`REMICADE SHOULD BE MONITORED CLOSELY. IF A PA-
`TIENT DEVELOPS A SERIOUS INFECTION OR SEPSIS,
`REMICADE THERAPY SHOULD BE DISCONTINUED (see
`ADVERSE REACTIONS, Infections).
`Hypersensitivity
`REMICADE has been associated with hypersensitivity re-
`actions that vary in their time of onset. Most hypersensitiv-
`ity reactions, which include urticaria, dyspnea, and/or hy-
`potension, have occurred during or within 2 hours of inflix,
`imab infusion, However, in some cases, serum sickness-like
`reactions have been observed in Crohn's disease patients 3
`to 12 days after REMICADE therapy was reinstituted fol-
`lowing an extended period without REMICADE treatment.
`Symptoms associated with these reactions include -fever,
`rash, headache, sore throat, myalgias, polyarthralgias,
`hand and facial edema and/or dysphagia, These reactions
`were associated with marked increase in antibodies to in-
`fliximab, loss of detectable serum concentrations of REMI-
`CADE, and possible loss of drug efficacy. REMICADE
`
`Information will be superseded by supplements and subsequent editions
`
`should be discontinued for severe reactions. Medications for
`the treatment of hypersensitivity reactions (e.g., acetamino.
`phen, antihistamines, corticosteroids and/or epinephrine)
`should be available for immediate use in the event of a re-
`action (see ADVERSE REACTIONS, Infusion-related Reac-
`tions)
`
`PRECAUTIONS
`Autoimmunity
`Treatment with REMICADE may result in the formation of
`autoantibodies and, rarely, in the development of a lupus-
`like syndrome. If a patient develops symptoms suggestive of
`a lupus-like syndrome follqwing treatment with' REMI.
`CADE, treatment should be discontinued (see ADVERSE
`REACTIONS, Autoantibodies /Lupus-like Syndrome).
`Malignancy
`Patients with long duration of Crohn's disease or rheuma-
`toid arthritis and chronic exposure to immunosuppressant
`therapies are more prone to develop lymphomas (see AD-
`VERSE REACTIONS, Malignancies/ Lymphoproliferative
`Disease). The impact of treatment with REMICADE on
`these phenomena is unknown
`Immunogenicity
`Treatment with REMICADE can be associated with the de-
`velopment ufantibod los to infliximab (also referred to as hu-.
`man antichimeric antibodies, IIACA). One hundred thirty-
`four of the 199 Crohn's disease patients treated with REMI-
`CADE were evaluated for the development of infliximab-
`specific antibodies; 18 03%) were antibody-positive (the
`majority at low titer, <1:20).. Patients who were antibody-
`positive were more likely to experience an infusion reaction
`(see ADVERSE REACTIONS, Infusion-related Reactions).
`Antibody development was lower among rheumatoid arthri-
`tis and Crohn's disease patients receiving immunosuppres-
`sant therapies such as 6-MP, AZA or MTX. With repeated
`dosing of REMICADE, serum concentrations of infliximab
`were higher in rheumatoid arthritis patients who received
`concomitant MTX. There are limited data available on the
`development of antibodies to infliximab in patients receiv-
`ing long-term treatment with REMICADE. Because immu-
`nogenicity analyses are product-specific, comparison of anti-
`body rates to those from other products is not appropriate.
`Vaccinations
`No data are available on the response to vaccination or on
`the secondary transmission of infection by live vaccines in
`patients receiving anti-TM' therapy. It is recommended
`that live vaccines not be given concurrently.
`Drug Interactions
`Specific drug interaction Studios, including interactions
`with MTX, have nut been conducted. The majority of pa-
`tients in rheumatoid arthritis or Crohn's disease clinical tri-
`als received one or more concomitant medications. In rheu-
`matoid arthritis, concomitant medications besides mirx
`were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, folic acid, co,
`ticosteroids and/or narcotics. Concomitant Crohn's disease
`medications were antibiotics, antiviral*, corticosteroids,
`6-54P/A4A and aminnaaricylates. Patients with Crohn's dis-
`ease who received immunosuppressants tended to experi-
`ence fewer infusion reactions compared to patients on no
`immunosuppressants (see PRECAUTIONS, Immanoilen'
`ity and ADVERSE REACTIONS, Infusion.edatert Reac-
`tions)
`Carcisiogenosis, Mutagerresis and Impairment of FertilnY
`lang•term studies in animals have not been performed 14
`evaluate the carcinogenic potential. No clastogenic or mum-
`genic effects of infliximah were observed in the in sum.
`mouse micronucleus test or the Salmonella Eechenthio roll
`(/trues) assay, respectively. Chromosarruil aberrations we0
`not observed in an assay poi-finned using human lymph'
`cytes, It is not known whether inffixiniab can impair Nail •
`ity in humans. No impairment of fertility was observed in s
`fertility rind general reproduction toxicity study conduct!-4
`in mice using an analogous antibody that selectively Web'
`its the functional activity of mouse TNFa.
`Pregnancy Category C
`Since infliximab does not arms-react with TM,. in specks
`other than humans and chimpanzees, animal reproffiirlsn'
`studies have net been conducted with REMICADE
`insub), It ix not known whether HEMICADE can cause fetal
`harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can sal"
`reproduction capacity while Whin-nal' is present irt Ups
`serum (ere CLINICAL. PHARMACOLOGY, Pharmacolnail'
`REMICADE should be given to a pregnant woman 011
`crubrl,°:,
`if clearly need-al No evidence of maternal (cid:9)
`toxicity or teralagenicily was observed in a ilcvsloproce.'
`
`Ex. 1007 - Page 3
`
`

`

`soul eer,rrieruips.are
`
`CENTOCOR/1087
`
`,,.,. Andy conducted in mice using an analogous anti..
`isedirely inhibits the functional activity of.
`lioft'w • (cid:9)
`too, that.
`ci.
`Plum°:1 s.."(1,11.1rrobern whether infliximab is excreted in human:
`"'"...166,nresd systemically after ingestion. Because
`It
`rook or
`1111d inimunoglobulins are excreted in human
`Miulsert'' ' becil use of the potential for adverse reactions in
`ta from REMICADE, a decision should be
`oulling,--4„,ag to discontinue nursing or in discontinue the
`
`riltu:taWki"6;.-g te'r La account the importance of the drug to the
`
`wr
`sod off .divenees of REMICADE in patients with ju-
`P (cid:9)
`Serlilt:rhelmi'doid 'arthritis' and in pediatric patients with
`ev-r.h.,6 ntnartae have not been established
`
`elltACT study, no overall differences were ubserved
`G.111.6461rTIse
`
`in effective obis or safety in the 72 pe. (lents aged 65 or older
`(cid:9) studies,
`m„nnind In younger patients. In Croluia
`were insufficient numbers of patients aged 65 or older
`there
`todetennine whether they respond differently from patients
`46d 18 to 0. Because there is a higher incidence of infec-
`nos in the elderly population in general, caution should be
`in treating the elderly Owe ADVERSE REACTIONS,
`Infections).
`ApviarsE REACTIONS
`A total of 771 patients ware treated with REMICADE in
`&me' al triale.le both Thal mataid arthri ti a and Croke.'"
`rase trials, approximately 5%, of petients discontinued
`REMICADE because of adverse experiences. The most com-
`mon reasons fur discontinuation of treatment were dyspnea,
`enjoins and headache-
`Infusion-related Reactions
`mote infusion reactinne
`An initiation reaction wan defined as any adverse event ac-
`euering during the infusion or within 1 tai 2 hears after the
`infueioa. Seventeen percent of REMICADE- treated patients
`in all clinical male experienced an infusion reaction com-
`pared to 7% of placebo-treated patients. Among the 3284
`RESIICADR infusions. 4% were accompanied by nonspecific
`symptoms such atilever or chills, 1% were accompanied by
`pruritus or urticaria, I% were accompanied by cardiopulmo-
`nary reactions (primarily chest pain, hypotension, hyper-
`tension or dysprical, and (LP& were accompanied by cam
`limed symptoms of pro ritudurticiarin and cardiopulmenary.
`imetiens. Luse than 2% of patients discontinued ItEP41-
`CADE because of infusion reactions, and all patients recov-
`ered with treatment and/or discontinuation of infusion.
`REMICADE infusions beyond the initial infusion in rheu-
`matoid arthritis patients were not associated with a higher
`incidence of reactions.
`Patients with Crohn's disease who became positive for anti-
`bodies to infliximab were more likely to develop infusion re-
`actions than were those who were negative (36% vs. 11%
`rispectively). Use of concomitant immunosuppressant
`agents appeared to reduce the frequency of antibodies to in-
`'hairnet) and infusion reactions (see PRECAUTIONS, Im-
`munogenicity and Drug Interactions).
`Reactions following readrninistration
`In a clinical trial of forty patients with Cretin's disease re-
`treated with infliximab following a 2 to 4 year period with-
`out infliximab treatment, 10 patients experienced adverse
`events manifesting 3 to 12 days following-infusion of which
`6 were considered serious. Signs and symptoms included
`myalgia and/or arthralgia with fever and/or rash, with some
`patients also experiencing pruritus, facial, hand or lip
`edema, dysphagia, urticaria, sore throat, and headache. Pa-
`tients experiencing these adverse events bad not experf-
`cared infusion-related adverse events associated with their,
`initial innocanab therapy. Of the 40 patients enrolled, these
`adverse events occurred in 9 of 23 (39%) who had received
`ilqUkd formulation which is no

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket