throbber
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
`33:S27-S35 © September 200 l Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., Philadelphia
`
`Approach to Steroid-Dependent and Steroid-Refractory
`Crohn' s Disease
`
`Gary R. Lichtenstein
`
`Department of Medicine, Center of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of
`Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
`
`Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel
`disease (IBD) that requires treatment not only to control
`symptoms of the active form of the disease but also to
`maintain disease remission after it is achieved. Cortico(cid:173)
`steroids have traditionally been the treatment of choice
`for the induction of clinical remission in adult patients
`with moderately to severely active CD, largely based on
`consistent evidence of high response rates in controlled
`clinical trials (1-4). Although these agents have not been
`studied extensively in the pediatric population, they have
`proved to be very effective in inducing remission in chil(cid:173)
`dren and adolescents in clinical practice, explaining their
`widespread use.
`However, despite their well-recognized efficacy in ac(cid:173)
`tive CD, corticosteroids have several limitations that can
`be obstacles to their use, particularly in pediatric pa(cid:173)
`tients. Among patients receiving corticosteroid therapy
`for induction of remission, 20% have corticosteroid(cid:173)
`refractory disease and 36% of those with an initial re(cid:173)
`sponse develop corticosteroid dependence within 1 year
`(4). Chronic corticosteroid exposure in patients who are
`steroid-dependent increases the risk for serious drug(cid:173)
`related adverse effects and provides little or no protec(cid:173)
`tion against relapse (1,2,5,6). Side effects such as moon
`face and acne are common in all individuals treated with
`steroids, regardless of their age, but can have an espe(cid:173)
`cially profound impact on the quality of life of children
`and adolescents. Prolonged use of corticosteroids can
`also have more far-reaching effects, such as exacerbation
`of growth failure, osteoporosis, and ocular abnormalities.
`In light of such limitations, withdrawal or reduction of
`corticosteroids has become an important goal of CD
`treatment. Several therapies, including budesonide, im(cid:173)
`munomodulators, biologic agents, and enteral feeding,
`have been evaluated for their corticosteroid-sparing ef(cid:173)
`fects. This review article briefly outlines the strengths
`and limitations of corticosteroid therapy and presents
`available data on the steroid-sparing benefits of alterna(cid:173)
`tive therapies.
`
`Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Gary R.
`Lichtenstein, Associate Professor of Medicine, Department of Medi(cid:173)
`cine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Penn(cid:173)
`sylvania School of Medicine, 3 Ravdin Building, 3400 Spruce Street,
`Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283.
`
`CLINICAL RATIONALE FOR STEROID
`SPARING IN CROHN'S DISEASE
`As mentioned, conventional corticosteroids are very
`effective in relieving the acute symptoms of CD but are
`also associated with high rates of dependence, resistance,
`and toxicity. Although these agents have not been well
`studied in pediatric patients, the problems identified in
`clinical investigations in adult populations may be of
`even greater concern in younger patients.
`
`Clinical Efficacy
`In controlled clinical trials in adults with active CD,
`investigators have reported a clinical response in 61-
`92% of patients treated with corticosteroids (1-4). How(cid:173)
`ever, the benefits of steroids are frequently short-lived.
`In a prospective study of 109 patients with CD who
`received an initial course of corticosteroid therapy, 20%
`of patients were refractory and 80% responsive to corti(cid:173)
`costeroid therapy at 30 days. By 1 year, 44% of those
`with an initial response remained responsive, 36% be(cid:173)
`came steroid-dependent, and 20% had refractory disease
`(Fig. 1) (4).
`The inability of corticosteroids to maintain long-term
`remission in CD patients has been established in several
`clinical trials (1,2,5,6). It was first documented in a
`placebo-controlled trial of 59 patients by Smith et al. (5),
`in which clinical relapse, recurrence, or extension of CD
`occurred in similar percentages of patients receiving
`low-dose prednisone (7.5 mg/day) and those receiving
`placebo (45% and 42%, respectively) over a 3-year pe(cid:173)
`riod. Similarly, no benefit was demonstrated with corti(cid:173)
`costeroid therapy versus placebo in preventing flare-up
`or recurrence of CD over a 2-year period in either the
`National Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study (NCCDS)
`(1) or the European Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study
`(ECCDS) (2). A recent meta-analysis of pooled data
`from three double-blind, placebo-controlled trials re(cid:173)
`vealed that oral corticosteroids fail to reduce relapse of
`CD at 6, 12, or 24 months (Fig. 2) (6).
`
`Toxicity
`
`Corticosteroid therapy is associated with a substantial
`risk for a number side effects that can affect virtually
`
`S27
`
`

`

`S28
`
`Immediate
`Outcomes
`(n=109)
`
`Prolonged
`Outcomes
`(n=87)
`
`Summary
`Outcomes
`(n=109)
`
`G. R. LICHTENSTEIN
`
`Remission
`48%
`
`Improved
`32%
`
`No
`Response
`20%
`
`Remission
`54%
`
`Relapse
`46%
`
`Improved
`57%
`
`Relapse
`43%
`
`Steroid Dependent
`36%
`(n=39)
`
`Prolonged Response
`44%
`(n=48)
`
`Steroid Resistant
`20%
`(n=22)
`
`FIG. 1. Conventional corticoste(cid:173)
`roid therapy in patients with CD.
`Outcome in 109 patients at 1 year
`after acute treatment (4).
`
`every organ system (Table I). Common acute effects
`include cosmetic changes, such as moon face and acne,
`which do not present a threat to patients' physical
`health but can reduce self-esteem and social function(cid:173)
`ing, particularly in young patients. An analysis of ad(cid:173)
`verse events that occurred in the NCCDS revealed
`that the incidence of moon face and acne rose steadily
`throughout the 4-month study phase (Table 2) (7). These
`effects have occurred with a high frequency (3I%
`and 20%, respectively) even in patients being tapered
`on a regimen of prednisolone (40 mg/day to 5 mg/day)
`(8).
`Of greater concern is the risk for morbidity that ac(cid:173)
`companies long-term corticosteroid use, including its ef(cid:173)
`fects on bone metabolism that frequently result in bone
`loss and skeletal fractures (9). This consequence of cor(cid:173)
`ticosteroid therapy is particularly disturbing in children
`because bone formation and turnover are fundamentally
`important to childhood growth and development. Corti(cid:173)
`costeroids produce bone loss by altering calcium me(cid:173)
`tabolism, suppressing production of gonadal hormones,
`and inhibiting bone formation. Prolonged steroid use in
`children can retard both epiphyseal maturation and long
`bone growth, although skeletal maturation is impeded
`more than linear growth (10). Dose-related fractures are
`experienced by approximately 30-50% of steroid-treated
`CD patients (II), with fractures occurring frequently in
`patients with a daily corticosteroid dose higher than I5
`mg/day and a total lifetime steroid dose higher than 30 g
`(12).
`Other effects of chronic corticosteroid use include the
`development of hyperglycemia and hypertension
`(13, I4 ). Adrenocortical suppression induced by cortico(cid:173)
`steroid therapy results in disturbances of sex hormones,
`specifically decreased levels of circulating estrogen (15)
`and low levels of testosterone (16,I7). Ocular abnormali(cid:173)
`ties related to glaucoma were observed in a group of
`prednisone-treated pediatric patients with IBD (18), and
`the prevalence of cataracts is increased by 50% in adults
`receiving systemic corticosteroid therapy ( 19).
`
`J Pediatr Gastroentero/ Nutr, Vol. 33, Suppl. I, 2001
`
`CORTICOSTEROID-SPARING TREATMENTS
`IN CROHN'S DISEASE
`
`Because of the risks and limitations of corticosteroids,
`their replacement with alternative agents should be con(cid:173)
`sidered in most patients. Several currently available and
`investigational agents have been evaluated for their
`corticosteroid-sparing effects in patients with
`corticosteroid-dependent CD. These include the second(cid:173)
`generation corticosteroid budesonide, the immunomodu(cid:173)
`lators azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, and
`cyclosporine, the anti-tumor necrosis factor-ex (anti(cid:173)
`TNF-cx) therapies infliximab, CDP-57I, thalidomide, and
`etanercept, and enteral nutrition.
`
`Budesonide
`
`Although not currently available in the United States
`for use in the management of IBD, controlled ileal(cid:173)
`release budesonide has been studied in adults for its
`steroid-sparing effects in CD. In a recent multicenter,
`double-blind study by Cortot et al. (20), 120 steroid(cid:173)
`dependent patients [Crohn's Disease Activity Index
`(CDAI) <200] were randomized to treatment with budes(cid:173)
`onide 6 mg/day or placebo once daily for 22 weeks.
`Daily doses of prednisolone were tapered from a range of
`10-30 mg to 0 mg during the first 4 to 10 weeks. Relapse
`was defined as a CDAI score >200, an increase from
`baseline in CDAI score of 2::60 points, or study discon(cid:173)
`tinuation because of disease exacerbation. Compared
`with placebo, budesonide was associated with signifi(cid:173)
`cantly higher remission rates at I week (83% versus
`59%, respectively; P = 0.004) and at 13 weeks (68%
`versus 35%, respectively; P < 0.00 I) after discontinua(cid:173)
`tion of prednisolone. The frequency of adverse events
`was similar between treatment groups. The results of this
`study suggest that budesonide may be useful as a short(cid:173)
`term replacement for conventional steroids in steroid(cid:173)
`dependent patients with CD.
`
`

`

`APPROACH TO STEROID-DEPENDENT AND STEROID-REFRACTORY CROHN'S DISEASE
`
`S29
`
`Expt
`n/N
`
`Ctrl
`n!N
`
`Peto OR
`(95% Cl Fixed)
`
`Weight
`%
`
`Peto OR
`(95% Cl Fixed)
`
`Study
`
`6 Months
`ECCDS, 1984
`
`14166
`
`19152
`
`NCCDS, 1979
`
`8143
`
`14183
`
`Smith, 1978
`
`1133
`
`0126------~----~·~
`
`Subtotal (95%CI) 23/142 331161
`Chi-square 3.00 (df=2) Z=1.10
`
`18.2
`
`12.7
`
`0.8
`
`31.7
`
`0.47 [0.21, 1.05]
`
`1.13 [0.43, 2.96]
`
`5.98 [0.12, 309.75]
`
`0.71 [0.38, 1.31]
`
`- 1
`
`.1 .2
`Ctrl
`n!N
`
`Expt
`n/N
`
`
`Peto OR
`(95% C/ Fixed)
`
`5 10
`Weight Peto OR
`(95% Cl Fixed)
`%
`
`A
`
`Study
`
`12 Months
`ECCDS, 1984
`
`25 I 66
`
`26 I 52
`
`NCCDS, 1979
`
`9133
`
`17160
`
`Smith, 1978
`
`3132
`
`0/26 ------~-----•
`Subtotal (95%CI) 371131 431138
`Chi-square 3.79 (df=2) Z=0.69
`
`--
`
`22.2
`
`13.4
`
`2.2
`
`37.8
`
`0.61 [0.30, 1.27]
`
`0.95 [0.37, 2.43]
`
`6.54 [0.65, 66.34]
`
`0.82 [0.47, 1.44]
`
`.1 .2
`1
`Peto OR
`Ctrl
`(95% Cl Fixed)
`n!N
`
`5 10
`Weight Peto OR
`%
`(95% Cl Fixed)
`
`Expt
`n!N
`
`22 I 42
`
`25 I 39
`
`8
`
`Study
`
`24 Months
`ECCDS, 1984
`
`NCCDS, 1979
`
`Smith, 1978 ·
`Subtotal (95%CI) 36 I 95
`Chi-square 0.68 (df=2) Z=1.01
`
`9128
`5125
`
`10124
`4124
`
`39 I 87 -
`96/368 115/386 -
`
`Total {95% Cl)
`Chi-square 7.62 (df=8) Z=1.60
`
`15.4
`
`0.62 [0.26, 1.50]
`
`9.4
`
`5.8
`
`0.67 [0.22, 2.05]
`
`1.24 [0.30, 5.20]
`
`30.6
`
`0.72 [0.39, 1.35]
`
`100.0
`
`0.75 [0.54, 1.06]
`
`FIG. 2. Combined data from
`analysis of three studies show
`odds ratios of relapse for active
`treatment with corticosteroids ver(cid:173)
`sus placebo at 6, 12, and 24
`months after study entry. From
`Steinhart AH, et al. (6) Repro(cid:173)
`duced with permission from Up(cid:173)
`date Software Ltd.
`
`c
`
`.1 .2
`
`1
`
`5 10
`
`Although budesonide may provide short-term steroid(cid:173)
`sparing benefits, little or no evidence supports its use as
`long-term maintenance therapy (6,21-25). Compared
`with placebo, budesonide failed to demonstrate signifi(cid:173)
`cant relapse prevention at dosages of 3 mg/day (22-24)
`and 6 mg/day (21,22,25). Corticosteroid-associated side
`effects were relatively uncommon in patients treated
`with budesonide as maintenance therapy, (21-23,25), but
`Lofberg et al. (22) reported a higher incidence of moon
`face and acne with budesonide versus placebo. Although
`no significant difference has been found in maintenance
`studies between budesonide and placebo groups in ef(cid:173)
`fects on the pituitary-adrenal axis, pituitary-adrenal axis
`
`suppression remains a concern. In addition, the risk for
`dependence associated with budesonide and its effects on
`bone metabolism have not been adequately assessed.
`Further investigation is therefore needed to better define
`the potential role for budesonide in the management of
`pediatric patients with CD who are resistant to, depen(cid:173)
`dent on, or intolerant of steroids.
`
`Immunomodulators
`
`Over the past decade, the immunomodulators azathio(cid:173)
`prine and 6-mercaptopurine have become increasingly
`used in patients with moderate to severe CD, particularly
`
`J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, Vol. 33, Suppl. I, 2001
`
`

`

`530
`
`G. R. LICHTENSTEIN
`
`TABLE 1. Adrerse effects of systemic corticosteroid
`therap_v (7,10,13)
`
`Body system
`
`Cutaneous
`
`Cardiovascular
`
`Endocrine
`
`Gastrointestinal
`
`Metabolic
`
`Multiple
`Neuropsychiatric
`
`Ocular
`
`Musculoskeletal
`
`Reproductive
`
`Adverse effects
`
`Acne
`Striae
`Petechiae
`Ecchymoses
`Hirsutism
`Vascular effects, purpura
`Hypertension
`Atherosclerosis
`Growth retardation (children)
`Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis
`suppression
`Nausea, vomiting
`Peptic ulcer disease
`Pancreatitis
`Esophagitis
`Hyperglycemia
`Hyperlipidemia
`Electrolyte imbalance
`Fluid retention (edema)
`Alteration of fat distribution (cushingoid
`appearance)
`Obesity
`Hypocalcemia
`Infections
`Emotional lability
`Anxiety
`Psychosis
`Peripheral neuropathy
`Glaucoma
`Cataracts
`Exophthalmos
`Hemorrhage
`Osteonecrosis
`Osteoporosis
`Myopathy
`Muscle atrophy
`Amenorrhea
`
`as maintenance therapy. These and other immunomodu(cid:173)
`latory agents have been evaluated as steroid-sparing
`therapy in controlled trials, with results varying by agent.
`
`Azathioprine/6-Mercaptopurine
`
`In a recent meta-analysis, Sandborn et al. (26) pooled
`data from five controlled studies that used azathioprine
`or 6-mercaptopurine for the treatment of active CD (27-
`
`TABLE 2. Corticosteroid therapy for Crohn's disease:
`incidence of acute side effects of prednisone at 17 weeks
`
`Side effect
`
`Moon facies
`Acne
`Infection
`Ecchymoses
`Hypertension
`Hirsutism
`Petechial bleeding
`Striae
`
`From Singleton JW et al. (7).
`
`Incidence (%)
`
`47
`30
`27
`17
`15
`7
`6
`6
`
`J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, Vol. 33, Suppl. 1, 2001
`
`31 ). In addition to their general efficacy in active int1am(cid:173)
`matory and fistulizing disease, azathioprine and
`6-mercaptopurine were also evaluated for their steroid(cid:173)
`sparing effects. Overall, steroid dosages were reduced to
`a dose of <10 mg of prednisone equivalent in 65% of
`patients treated with the immunomodulators compared
`with 36% of patients treated with placebo (Table 3 ). The
`pooled odds ratio for these studies was 3.86, indicating
`that three patients required treatment with azathioprine to
`achieve a corticosteroid-sparing effect (prednisone < l 0
`mg) in one patient.
`In a small uncontrolled study of pediatric patients with
`IBD (12 with CD, nine with ulcerative colitis) (32), aza(cid:173)
`thioprine 2 mg/kg/day was effective as adjunctive
`therapy to conventional steroid treatment. Six of the pa(cid:173)
`tients with CD had a complete response to the combined
`therapy, and four patients in this group were able to
`discontinue corticosteroids within 6 months after starting
`azathioprine.
`Promising results were also reported in a study evalu(cid:173)
`ating the corticosteroid-sparing efficacy of 6-mer(cid:173)
`captopurine in adolescent patients with CD (33). All 36
`patients had been treated with corticosteroids, sulfasala(cid:173)
`zine, antibiotics, and nutritional support for 5.0 ± 3.0
`years before receiving 6-mercaptopurine, with persis(cid:173)
`tence of intractable symptoms. Among 30 patients
`treated with 6-mercaptopurine for at least 1 year, 29
`(93%) required prednisone in the year before starting
`treatment with 6-mercaptopurine yet remained highly
`symptomatic. During the first 6 months of 6-mer(cid:173)
`captopurine use, 17 (57%) patients were able to discon(cid:173)
`tinue prednisone. At the end of 1 full year of treatment
`with 6-mercaptopurine, 24 (80%) patients no longer re(cid:173)
`quired corticosteroid therapy.
`More recently, Markowitz et al. (34) conducted a
`placebo-controlled study of children (n = 55) with mod(cid:173)
`erately to severely active CD, which also showed that
`6-mercaptopurine enabled the withdrawal of corticoste(cid:173)
`roids after induction of remission and increased the rate
`of maintenance of remission with less corticosteroid use.
`In this study, 6-mercaptopurine (1.5 mg/kg/day) was
`administered to children with a tapering regimen of cor(cid:173)
`ticosteroids (prednisone 40 mg/day tapered according
`to clinical response to 0 mg). At 12 weeks, 6-mer-
`
`TABLE 3. Steroid withdrawal in active Crohn's disease:
`AZA/6-MP efficacya (26 )
`
`Patients achieving a
`reduced steroid doseb
`
`Medication
`Placebo
`
`n (o/c)
`
`76/117 (65)
`39/109 (36)
`
`AZA, azathioprine: 6-MP, 6-mercaptopurine.
`a Pooled data (27-31).
`h Final prednisone dose :s I 0 mg/day.
`
`95% Confidence
`interval
`
`56-74%
`27-45%
`
`

`

`APPROACH TO STEROID-DEPENDENT AND STEROID-REFRACTORY CROHN'S DISEASE
`
`S3!
`
`captopurine did not demonstrate significant efficacy
`compared with placebo for induction of remission. How(cid:173)
`ever, at 12 months after induction of remission, 23 of 24
`pediatric patients (96%) who continued on 6-mercap(cid:173)
`topurine remained in remission versus 15 of 25 patients
`(60%) who continued on placebo (P < 0.01) (34). More(cid:173)
`over, the mean cumulative use of prednisone at 12
`months was significantly lower (P < 0.01) among
`6-mercaptopurine-treated patients ( 4841 mg) than among
`placebo-treated patients (7930 mg).
`The steroid-sparing benefits of azathioprine and
`6-mercaptopurine may be limited in some patients by the
`delayed onset of response and the rare but serious tox(cid:173)
`icities associated with these agents. The potential for
`adverse effects such as pancreatitis, bone marrow sup(cid:173)
`pression, and opportunistic infection is a concern in pe(cid:173)
`diatric patients with CD, requiring regular monitoring.
`An increased risk for immunosuppressive sequelae has
`not been confirmed with these agents, but evaluation is
`ongoing as the numbers of patients receiving long-term
`therapy increase (35).
`
`Methotrexate
`
`To date, no published trials have evaluated methotrex(cid:173)
`ate use in pediatric CD. However, the corticosteroid(cid:173)
`sparing effects of methotrexate have been recognized in
`adults with the disorder in recent years. In a double-blind
`16-week trial, 141 patients with corticosteroid-refractory
`CD were randomized to treatment with intramuscular
`methotrexate at a weekly dose of 25 mg or placebo (36).
`At the end of 16 weeks, significantly more methotrexate(cid:173)
`treated patients than placebo patients were in remission
`and able to discontinue prednisone (39% versus 19%,
`respectively; P = 0.025). Furthermore, patients treated
`with methotrexate required significantly less prednisone
`than those treated with placebo (P = 0.03). However, 16
`of 94 patients (17%) in the methotrexate group discon(cid:173)
`tinued treatment because of adverse effects (including
`nausea, vomiting, and asymptomatic elevation of serum
`aminotransferase levels) compared with 1 of 47 patients
`(2%) receiving placebo (P = 0.01 ), suggesting that side
`effects may compromise the steroid-sparing benefits of
`methotrexate in a substantial proportion of patients.
`A maintenance trial conducted by the investigators of
`the aforementioned trial evaluated patients in remission
`after 16 to 24 weeks of acute treatment with intramus(cid:173)
`cular methotrexate 25 mg/week who were subsequently
`maintained on intramuscular methotrexate 15 mg/week
`for an additional 40 weeks (37). At 40 weeks, signifi(cid:173)
`cantly more patients treated with methotrexate (26/40;
`65%) were in remission than those treated with placebo
`(14/36; 39%; P = 0.04). This response resulted in sig(cid:173)
`nificantly fewer methotrexate-treated patients than
`placebo-treated patients requiring prednisone for disease
`flares (28% versus 58%, respectively; P = 0.01). It is
`
`noteworthy that a large number of patients in both the
`methotrexate ( 42%) and placebo ( 64%) groups discon(cid:173)
`tinued treatment before the end of the 40-week study.
`
`Cyclosporine
`
`Unlike the clinical findings reported with the previ(cid:173)
`ously mentioned immunomodulators, study data do not
`clearly support the use of cyclosporine in steroid(cid:173)
`dependent CD. In three large (n = 305, n = 182, n =
`147) placebo-controlled studies of patients with chronic
`active corticosteroid-resistant or dependent disease, oral
`cyclosporine therapy at a dose of 5 mg/kg/day failed to
`demonstrate either clinical efficacy or a corticosteroid(cid:173)
`sparing effect compared with placebo (38--40). In con(cid:173)
`trast, among patients with active chronic CD (median
`CDAI score 261) who were resistant to or intolerant of
`corticosteroids, clinical improvement was achieved after
`3 months in a significantly higher proportion of patients
`receiving a median oral cyclosporine daily dose of 7.6
`mg/kg (22/37; 59%) than those receiving placebo (11/34;
`32%; P = 0.032) (41). However, although the mean
`reduction from baseline in CDAI score at the end of the
`3-month treatment period in the cyclosporine group was
`significantly greater than that in the placebo group (P =
`0.00012), the final mean CDAI score (CDAI score 227)
`was not below the score that defines remission (CDAI
`<150), indicating that this cyclosporine regimen was in(cid:173)
`effective in inducing disease remission.
`The high incidence of toxicity associated with cyclo(cid:173)
`sporine is also an obstacle to its use in the treatment of
`CD. Adverse events associated with cyclosporine in con(cid:173)
`trolled clinical trials that required treatment discontinu(cid:173)
`ation included paresthesia, hypertrichosis, headache,
`tremor, hypertension, and increased serum creatinine
`levels (38--40). The risk for infection, neuropathy, and
`nephrotoxicity, albeit relatively low, is also a concern.
`Patients with CD treated chronically with cyclosporine
`can be expected to experience a 20% reduction in glo(cid:173)
`merular filtration rate ( 42), which may be associated with
`irreversible nephropathy at dosages >5 mg/kg/day (43).
`In clinical trials, serious adverse events occurred in ap(cid:173)
`proximately 9-12% of patients receiving cyclosporine
`( 44,45), including 3 deaths.
`
`Clinically Available Anti-TNF -a Therapy
`
`lnfliximab
`
`In controlled clinical trials, infliximab has demon(cid:173)
`strated significant efficacy in adult patients with moder(cid:173)
`ately to severely active CD resistant to conventional
`treatment, patients with fistulizing disease, and patients
`with quiescent disease who responded to initial treatment
`with infliximab ( 46--48). Open-label data in adults with
`CD indicate that infliximab also has utility in patients
`
`J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, Vol. 33, Suppl. I, 2001
`
`

`

`S32
`
`G. R. LICHTENSTEIN
`
`who are refractory to or dependent on corticosteroids.
`Cohen et a!. (49) reported on the corticosteroid-sparing
`effects of infliximab in 81 patients with luminal disease
`and 48 patients with fistulizing disease who received at
`least 1 infusion of infliximab. Corticosteroid tapering
`was achieved in >90% of patients with luminal disease
`after an initial infusion; 54% of patients were able to
`completely discontinue corticosteroids after the second
`infusion of infliximab. A sustained median steroid dose
`of 0 mg was achieved from 4 months after infusion on(cid:173)
`ward (Fig. 3).
`Ricart et a!. (50) reported on the clinical outcome and
`safety of 100 patients at the Mayo Clinic treated with
`infliximab for refractory inflammatory and/or fistulizing
`CD. Forty-four patients in this study cohort were evalu(cid:173)
`ated for steroid tapering. Of these, 40 patients (91%)
`underwent steroid tapering, and 29 of these 40 (73%)
`were able to completely discontinue steroid therapy. Me(cid:173)
`dian time of follow-up was 34 weeks (range 14-48
`weeks).
`The steroid-sparing effects of infliximab have also
`been observed in pediatric patients. In a preliminary
`open-label study of 15 pediatric patients (aged 6-18
`years) with medically refractory CD [inability to taper
`steroids, lack of response to immunomodulator therapy
`over 4 months, and active disease as measured by the
`Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI)],
`clinical remission and a significant decrease in daily
`corticosteroid use were observed in 10 patients (67%)
`at 4 and 10 weeks after a single infliximab infusion
`(5 mg/kg) (51). A retrospective chart review of 19 chil(cid:173)
`dren and adolescents with corticosteroid-resistant or
`corticosteroid-dependent CD who received one to three
`infusions of infliximab over 12 weeks revealed signifi(cid:173)
`cant improvement within the first 4 weeks of treatment
`(as evidenced by decrease in PCDAI values; P < 0.0001)
`(52). Mean daily prednisone dosages at baseline, 4
`weeks, and 12 weeks were 28 ± 14 mg, 20 ± 12 mg, and
`8 ± 12 mg, respectively (P < 0.01).
`
`The most common side effects reported with inflix(cid:173)
`imab therapy include headache, nausea, upper respirato(cid:173)
`ry tract infection, abdominal pain, fatigue, and fever. In
`placebo-controlled clinical trials and open trials in pa(cid:173)
`tients with CD and rheumatoid arthritis (n = 771 ), in(cid:173)
`fusion reactions were observed in 17% of patients re(cid:173)
`ceiving infliximab and 7% of those receiving placebo:
`Serious reactions were reported with <0.5% of infusions
`and infusion reactions were the cause for discontinuation
`in less than 2% of patients (53). Analysis of long-term
`safety data (including follow-up of 3 years) indicated no
`increased risk for mortality, serious infections, or malig(cid:173)
`nancy among infliximab-treated patients, although the
`numbers of patients included for analysis are relatively
`low and assessment of long-term safety is ongoing.
`
`Investigational Anti-TNF -a Therapy
`
`CDP-571
`
`Steroid-sparing effects have also been demonstrated
`with the investigational anti-TNF-a drug CDP-571. A
`double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated CDP-
`571 in 71 corticosteroid-dependent CD patients (CDAI
`<150 and prednisone dose of 15 to 40 mg/day or budes(cid:173)
`onide dose of 9 mg/day for >8 weeks) (54). Patients were
`randomized to treatment with CDP-571 (20 mg/kg at
`week 0 and 10-mg/kg dose at week 8) or placebo. Pred(cid:173)
`nisone and budesonide were tapered to 0 mg over 10
`weeks in all patients. At week 40, 17 of 39 patients
`(44%) in the CDP-571 group remained free of disease
`flare compared with only seven of 32 patients (22%) in
`the placebo group (P = 0.05). Serious adverse effects
`occurred in both treatment groups (18% for CDP-571;
`13% for placebo). Anti-double-stranded DNA was posi(cid:173)
`tive in 6.7% of patients.
`
`Etanercept
`The human IgG 1 TNF-a receptor fusion antibody
`etanercept has been investigated for its efficacy in the
`
`-<>-Mean
`
`...... Median
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`c; 40
`.§.
`Cll
`II)
`0
`0
`Cll c:
`0
`-~ c:
`'0
`....
`Cll
`c..
`~
`cv
`0
`MonthsAfter 0+---~--~---±--~~~----~--~~--~~~~~~t FIG. 3. Steroid tapering with in(cid:173)
`fliximab since its initial infusion.
`2
`3
`5
`1
`4
`6
`First Infusion:
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`Reproduced with permission
`23
`12
`4
`32
`32
`4
`n= 54
`34
`9
`19
`18
`from Cohen RD, et al. (49).
`
`J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. Vol. 33. Suppl. I. 2001
`
`16
`
`

`

`APPROACH TO STEROID-DEPENDENT AND STEROID-REFRACTORY CROHN'S DISEASE
`
`S33
`
`treatment of active CD, although specific steroid-sparing
`endpoints have not yet been assessed. D'Haens et aL (55)
`conducted a small pilot study in which I 0 patients with
`active Crohn's disease received 25-mg subcutaneous in(cid:173)
`jections of etanercept twice weekly for 12 weeks. Pa(cid:173)
`tients also received prednisone, 5-aminosalicylic acid,
`and azathioprine during this study. Clinical response, de(cid:173)
`fined as a reduction in CDAI score of ?:.70 points, was
`seen in 60% of patients at week 2 of treatment. Median
`CDAI scores decreased from 305 (range 294-418) to 166
`(range I 07-392). Mucosal healing was not observed in
`these patients. A recent randomized, double-blind,
`placebo-controlled trial demonstrated no efficacy over
`placebo when subcutaneous etanercept was given at 25
`mg twice weekly for treatment of active CD (56). Clini(cid:173)
`cal investigation of etanercept as treatment for CD has
`been discontinued by the manufacturer.
`
`Thalidomide
`
`The results of two recent open-label pilot studies sug(cid:173)
`gest that thalidomide may have a corticosteroid-sparing
`effect (57,58). In the first of these 12-week studies, 22
`patients with refractory CD were treated with a bedtime
`dose of thalidomide 200 mg or 300 mg (57). Three of 14
`patients (21%) were able to discontinue corticosteroids
`by week 12. Of I4 patients who completed 12 weeks of
`treatment, nine patients ( 41%) achieved clinical remis(cid:173)
`sion. The second of these studies enrolled 12 patients
`with active, steroid-dependent CD. Half received tha(cid:173)
`lidomide 50 mg nightly and half received thalidomide
`I 00 mg nightly (58). All patients in this study were able
`to taper corticosteroid therapy by ?:.50%, and by week 12
`four of I 0 ( 40%) of patients discontinued corticosteroid
`therapy completely.
`High incidences of dose-related sedation (58-100%)
`and peripheral neuropathy (14-42%) in both studies, as
`well as discontinuation of medication due to adverse
`events by 14% of patients in the first study, suggest that
`the potential benefit of thalidomide as a steroid-sparing
`agent may be outweighed by its toxicity (57,58).
`
`Enteral Nutrition
`
`Enteral nutrition is prescribed in patients with IBD to
`correct nutrient deficiencies and as primary therapy for
`active disease (59). The benefits of this treatment ap(cid:173)
`proach in adult patients include induction of remission,
`correction of nutrient deficiencies, and possible
`corticosteroid-sparing effects, whereas limitations in(cid:173)
`clude failure to maintain remission, high cost, and poor
`compliance. Pooled results of 12 randomized, controlled
`trials in adult CD patients showed an overall remission
`rate of 71% for those receiving an enteral diet versus
`85% of those receiving corticosteroids (59).
`
`Although enteral nutrition has been evaluated in both
`adult and pediatric patients with CD, outcomes have
`been somewhat more positive in children (60). In a pro(cid:173)
`spective study of 44 children (median age 48 months),
`induction of remission occurred in 25 of 30 patients
`(83%) on enteral therapy compared with 18 of 28 pa(cid:173)
`tients (64%) on prednisolone (61). After 12 months of
`treatment, height-for-age z-scores were significantly bet(cid:173)
`ter in the nutritional therapy group than the prednisolone
`group (1.31 versus 2.15, respectively; P < 0.001 ).
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`
`Clinical experience has established the utility of con(cid:173)
`ventional corticosteroids in inducing remission in adults
`and children with moderately to severely active CD.
`However, children are especially vulnerable to the harm(cid:173)
`ful and even permanent side effects of corticosteroids,
`which are numerous and have the potential to affect al(cid:173)
`most every organ system. The pronounced cosmetic
`changes, growth failure, and bone loss experienced in
`young patients treated with steroids are impediments to
`their psychosocial and physical well-being that may out(cid:173)
`weigh steroid-induced relief from CD symptoms. There(cid:173)
`fore, therapeutic agents with steroid-sparing efficacy
`may be particularly beneficial in the management of pe(cid:173)
`diatric CD that requires ongoing treatment.
`Although few studies have been conducted in pediatric
`populations, clinical data suggest that clinically available
`agents with corticosteroid-sparing efficacy include the
`immunomodulators azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine and
`methotrexate and the anti-TNF-a monoclonal antibody
`infliximab (Table 4). Conventional corticosteroids can be
`replaced by budesonide in corticosteroid-dependent pa(cid:173)
`tients without substantially compromising disease stabil(cid:173)
`ity and with a lower risk for toxicity, but no maintenance
`benefit has been documented with this second-generation
`steroid. Preliminary findings suggest that the experimen(cid:173)
`tal anti

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket