throbber
Downloaded from
`
`http://gut.bmj.com/
`
` on October 2, 2017 - Published by
`
`group.bmj.com
`
`470
`
`Gutl997; 40:470-474
`
`Treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor
`oxpentifylline does not improve corticosteroid
`dependent chronic active Crohn's disease
`
`J Bauditz, J H aem ling, M Ortner, H Lochs, A Raedler, S Schreiber
`
`Abstract
`Background-In Crohn's disease, inflam(cid:173)
`mation is presumably sustained by an
`increased production of prointlammatory
`cytokines, in particular tumour necrosis
`factor a
`(TNFa) and interleukin ljl
`(ILl P>. TNFa can induce a host of cellular
`effector events resulting in perpetuation of
`the inflammatory process. In vivo studies
`with anti-TNFa antibody treatment have
`led to impressive clinical results.
`Aims--To investigate whether treatment
`with the TNFa inhibitor oxpentifylline
`results in clinical improvement in corti(cid:173)
`costeroid dependent
`chronic
`active
`Crohn's disease.
`Methods-Sixteen Crohn's disease patients
`received oxpentifylline 400 mg four times a
`day in a four week open label study.
`Results--Blockade ofTNFa production in
`16 patients with corticosteroid dependent
`Crohn' s disease did not improve the clini(cid:173)
`cal disease activity (COAl mean (SEM)
`188·75 (5·65) versus 185·13 (10·87) or the
`endoscopic degree of
`inflammation
`(CDEIS 14·9 (2·87) versus 14·8 (2·27) or
`laboratory parameters.
`Conclusions-In this study, use of the
`TNFa inhibitor oxpentifylline does not
`improve inflammation in Crohn's disease.
`This finding suggests that there may be
`more key mediators than only TNFa in the
`inflammatory process in Crohn's disease.
`(Gut 1997; 40: 470-474)
`
`Keywords: Crohn's disease, intestinal immunity,
`rumou r necrosis factor a, inflammation, oxpentifyllin e.
`
`Recent studies have convincingly demonstrated
`that an increased release of proinflammatory
`cytokines by intestinal lamina propria mono(cid:173)
`nuclear cells is involved in the perpetuation of
`intestinal inflammation in inflammatory bowel
`disease (IBD). •-s Intestinal as well as peripheral
`mononuclear cells are highly activated during
`acute inflammatory bowel disease and hence
`capable of releasing increased amounts of
`several proinflammatory mediators including
`tumour necrosis factor a (TNFa) and inter(cid:173)
`leukin 113 (llr 1 J3). •-a In vitro findings show that
`TNFa is capable of inducing a host of pro(cid:173)
`inflammatory effector events, which are
`thought to be implicated in the pathophysiology
`of iDD. TNFa has been shown to be involved
`in neutrophil
`accumulation,'
`granuloma
`formation,••" upregulation of adhesion mole-
`
`cules on endothelial cells, 12 procoagulant
`effects, 13 induction of increased intestinal per(cid:173)
`meability, 14 and also has direct cyropathic
`effects. 15 TNFa concentrations in serum•• as
`well as stool 17 and intestinal mucosa 1 2 5 were
`found to be raised in patients with active
`Crohn's disease, in comparison with both
`normal contrOls and inactive disease.' 2 18 19
`However, increased transcription and trans(cid:173)
`lation of TNFa is not specific for IBD.20 21 In
`other studies, Isaacs et a/ could not detect
`TNFa messenger RNA in a considerable
`number of biopsy specimens from patiems with
`IDD/ and Hyams et al22 did not report
`increased TNFa values in patients with ffiD.
`The hypothesis that TNFa may be of
`particular importance in the induction and
`perpetuation of intestinal inflammation in IBD
`and consequently suppression ofTNFa should
`improve inflammation in patients with Crohn's
`disease was strongly supported by a series of
`recent therapeutic studiesY 24 Experimental
`treatment of corticosteroid dependent patients
`with active Crohn's disease by a one time
`application of a humanised monoclonal anti(cid:173)
`body directed against TNFa (cA2 lgGl) has
`generated impressive clinical results. Within
`four weeks, clinical and endoscopic inflam(cid:173)
`mation completely resolved in eight of 10
`patients. 24 Other pilot studies using a different
`monoclonal antibody (CDP571) directed
`against TNFa could not gen erate such
`impressive results.25 The CDP571 antibody is
`from the lgG4 subclass and is therefore theor(cid:173)
`etically less capable to activate complement in
`comparison with an lgGl antibody.
`If reduction ofTNFa is the exclusive mech(cid:173)
`anism of action of the TNFa cA2 antibody
`treatment, other drugs that also reduce TNFa
`should have similar effects. Oxpentifylline
`(pentoxifylline, PTX), a xanthinoxidase inhibi(cid:173)
`tor, is a strong suppressor of TNFa release by
`a host of different cell populations in vitro as
`well as in vivo.26-33 ln dose between 1200 mgld
`and 2000 mgld, PTX was a strong inhibitor
`of TNFa release in vivo and effective in
`improving TNFa
`releated
`inflammatory
`disease. 27
`' ' The presence of corticosteroids
`29
`-
`potentiates the TNFa inhibitory effect of
`PTX. 34 However, as other phosphodiesterase
`inhibitors PTX has additional contrainflam(cid:173)
`matory effects,"' 35 some of which cannot be
`restored by addition ofTNFa in vitro."'
`We treated 16 patients with stable, cortico(cid:173)
`steroid dependent Crohn's disease with PTX
`at a dose of 400 mg four times daily in an open
`label study in which we found no improvement
`
`Charite University
`H ospital, 4th
`Department of
`Medicine/Mucosal
`hnmunology Unit,
`BerUn, Germany
`] Bauditz
`M Ortner
`H Lochs
`S Schrieber
`
`Tabea lnflpmmatory
`Bowd Disease CeDter,
`Hamburg, Germany
`JHaemling
`A Raedler
`Correspondence to:
`Dr S Schreiber,
`Univers.itUtsklinikum
`C haritl:, fV Medi.tin.ischc
`Klinik und Polildinik,
`(Gastroenterology),
`Schumannstr 20121,
`101 17 Bcrlio, ~rmany.
`Accepted for publie:2tion
`28 Augusl 199~
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://gut.bmj.com/
`
` on October 2, 2017 - Published by
`
`group.bmj.com
`
`Oxpemifylline in Crohn 's disease
`
`471
`
`of intestinal inflammation or clinical symp(cid:173)
`toms. The discordance of our findings and
`those by Dullemen et al23 24 raises important
`questions regarding the mechanism of cA2 anti
`TNFa antibody treatment.
`
`Methods
`
`PATIENTS
`dependent
`corticosteroid
`active
`Chronic
`Crohn's disease was defined by a Crohn's
`disease activity index (COAl) between 150-250
`and at least 10 mg prednisone daily for a
`minimum of three months. Patients had to have
`at least one active episode requiring acute phase
`treatment}6 in the preceding six months. Diag(cid:173)
`nosis of Crohn's colitis or ileocolitis involving at
`least 30 em of the large bowel had to be
`previously established by radiological, endos(cid:173)
`copic, or clinical criteria/7 or all three. Only
`mesalazine (up to a dose of 1 g thrice daily) and
`corticosteroids were permitted
`as
`anti(cid:173)
`inflammatory treatment and had to be kept
`stable two weeks before the study. Use of
`loperamide or codeine to control diarrhoea was
`permitted and recorded for calculation of the
`than
`COAl. No pain medications, other
`tramadol, nutritional therapy (parenteral, for(cid:173)
`mula diets) or immunosuppressives (within the
`preceding six weeks), were permitted.
`Exclusion criteria were bacterial or parasitic
`pathogens in the patients' stools, a positive
`Clostridium diffici/e toxin test, clinical signs of
`septicaemia, intestinal perforation, megacolon,
`histOry of resections other than an ileocaecal
`resection, signs of stenosis, active fungal or viral
`infection or when it was felt that patients could
`not be maintained stable with their present
`therapeutic regimen for the time of study.
`Patients were also excluded if they had raised
`transaminase activities (>3 times normal),
`hyperbilirubinaemia (>2 times normal), signs
`of renal dysfunction (serum creatinine >33%
`increased) or a serum cholesterol concentration
`of less than 100 mgldl. Informed consent was
`obtained from all patients. The study was given
`approval by the local ethics review committee.
`Of 152 patients with Crohn's disease seen in
`the outpatient clinics, 47 patients with chronic
`active Crohn's disease were screened for
`inclusion in the study. Of these, 31 patients
`were excluded for several reasons: a history of
`
`Clinical data of patients
`
`bowel surgery other than ileocaecal resection
`(9), because it was not expected that their
`corticosteroid treatment would remain stable
`throughout the study (7), clinical signs of
`stenosis ( 6), positive Clostridium difficile toxin
`testing
`(1),
`increased
`transaminases and
`bilirubin (1), and signs of renal dysfunction
`(2). Five patients refused to enter the study.
`The remaining 16 patients (Table) received
`oxpentifylline.
`
`BASEUNE STUDIES AND FOLLOW UP
`A clinical visit was scheduled two weeks before
`the tentative sta.rt of oxpentifylline treatment
`and colonoscopy performed within one week
`before enrolment.
`The ability to perform social functions was
`estimated with a questionnaire according to
`Robinson et al. 38 The social function question(cid:173)
`naire consisted of the following seven ques(cid:173)
`tions: How much do you feel affected by your
`disease: (1) in job related activities, (2) in
`everyday activities in your home, (3) in private
`activities outside your home, (4)
`in your
`general social contacts, (5) in your hobbies/
`spare time, (6) in sexual activities, and (7)
`during sleep. Patients were instructed to mark
`their answer on a horizontal line of7 em length
`with the far left side indicating that the social
`function asked for was not affected and the far
`right side indicated that it was maximally
`affected. Measuring the distance from the far
`left side to the marker the patient set, values
`could be obtained which reached from 0 (fully
`capable of performing the social function) to 7
`(intense suffering from a total disability to
`perform the social function).
`All patients received oxpentifylline (pen(cid:173)
`toxifylline (PTX), Trental, Hoechst AG, Frank(cid:173)
`furt, Germany) at a dose of 400 mg four times
`daily orally. This dose range is established as
`inhibitory for TNF release by trials in AIDS, 28
`bone marrow transplantation27 as well as in
`healthy volunteers.29 Patients were seen two and
`four weeks after start of PTX treatment and at
`each of these time points, laboratory tests were
`performed (including CRP and C reactive
`protein erythrocyte sedimentation rate), a
`physical examination carried out, and the COAl
`calculated. At the four week time point the
`questionnaire, pertaining to the patient's social
`functions/8 was repeated. After four weeks PTX
`
`Corticosteroid
`Duration of
`lkocaecaJ treatment
`Crohn's
`(montlu)
`Pat~nt Age (y) Sex disease (y) CDAI CDELS resection
`
`Prednisone Extraintesti11aJ
`dose (mg) manijesuuwns
`
`Ileum
`Mesalazine inwl'lltd
`
`I
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`II
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`
`23
`19
`24
`20
`27
`31
`56
`47
`42
`41
`37
`2S
`18
`22
`34
`29
`
`M
`F
`F
`M
`M
`F
`F
`F
`M
`F
`F
`M
`F
`F
`M
`F
`
`4
`7
`5
`2
`8
`5
`24
`17
`2·5
`4 ·5
`II
`9
`2
`1·5
`7
`10
`
`167
`188
`202
`187
`190
`212
`232
`170
`205
`212
`207
`16S
`152
`178
`202
`151
`
`No
`12·4
`15·8 No
`Yes
`14·8
`13·2
`No
`No
`11·7
`No
`13·4
`17·8
`Yes
`16·2
`No
`20·2
`Yes
`No
`15
`13·4
`No
`No
`18·4
`No
`19
`9·6
`No
`No
`11 ·6
`15·4
`No
`
`7
`9
`17
`12
`90
`7
`144
`60
`10
`14
`66
`s
`6
`6
`48
`30
`
`10
`15
`15
`10
`10
`10
`20
`IS
`20
`25
`20
`IS
`10
`10
`IS
`20
`
`arthralgia
`anbritis
`arthralgia
`
`anhralgia
`
`Yes
`Yes
`arthralgia
`erythema nodosum Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`No
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`
`anbritis
`
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`No
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`No
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`No
`Yes
`Yes
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://gut.bmj.com/
`
` on October 2, 2017 - Published by
`
`group.bmj.com
`
`472
`
`Bauditz, Haemling, Omur, Lochs, Raedler, Schreiber
`
`medication was stopped and a repeat colon(cid:173)
`oscopy was performed (trial end :t3 days).
`increase or
`Patients were
`informed
`to
`decrease their conicosteroid dose in a range of
`:!: 10 mg on demand. Conicosteroid use was
`protocolled in patients diaries. All patients who
`worsened during the trial (by an increase in
`CDAI of >50 points or by physicians global
`assessments), were treated appropriately by
`increasing the daily dose of prednisone. In this
`case PTX was stopped. Patients who stopped
`their medication because of adverse reaction
`(none) or
`treatment failure
`(four), were
`followed up in the same way as those who
`continued
`to receive PTX. The primary
`outcome measure was the induction of clinical
`remission, as defined by decrease of the CD AI
`below 150, but at least by 50 points. Secondary
`outcome measures were changes in CDAI,
`Crohn's disease endoscopic index (CDEIS),l"
`the ability to reduce prednisolone treatment,
`and improvement of social functions.
`
`!:!?
`w
`0 u
`
`20 -
`
`15 -
`
`10 .
`
`s -
`
`300 - B
`
`<(
`0 u
`
`200 -
`
`100 -
`
`n = 16
`
`Start
`
`n = 12
`
`4 Weeks
`
`I:-: \'ITRO CYTOKI!Sc STt;DIES
`Fetal calf sera and pokeweed mitogen were
`purchased from Gibco (Grand Island, NY).
`TN Fa, ILl~' and IL6 ELISA kits were
`obtained from R&D/DPC Biermann (Bad
`Nauheim, Germany). All other chemicals were
`obtained from Sigma if not specified differently.
`Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC)
`or peripheral blood monocytes were isolated as
`previously described/0 cultured in the presence
`of pokeweed mitogen ( 1% voVvol, 24 hours),
`and supernatant cytokine values determined in
`duplicate by ELISA.
`
`STATISTICS
`(SEM).
`Results are expressed as mean
`Statistical significance of differences was tested
`by non-parametric Spearman correlation~' or
`the Mann-Whitney U test.
`
`s -
`
`0
`
`- - -- - - -
`14
`Pentoxifylline (days)
`
`- - - - - -
`28
`
`CDEIS and CDAI under treatmem u:ith oxpemifyl/in~.
`CDE!S scores before and after treatmem with oxpemifyllin~
`appeared to be tmchanged. (A) Average CDEIS score.<
`were 14·9 (2·87) before (n=/6) and 14·8 (2·27) after
`treatmem (n=/2). In four patiems oxpemif:yllinc had Ill be
`stopped after tu·o u:eeks became of an increased diseas~
`activity. (8) CDAI scores before treatment with
`oxpemif:ylline ranged berween ISQ-250. During the rna/ w
`significam imprm·emem ~~as obscn·ed.
`
`Serum concentrations of C reactive protein
`(27· 1 (14·7) before treatment versus 35·2
`( I 7 · 5) after treatment) and erythrocyte sedi(cid:173)
`mentation rate (22·8 (4·6) before treatment
`versus 28·6 (5·4) after treatment) did not
`change significantly.
`None of the patients receiving oxpentifylline
`treatment experienced severe side effects.
`
`Results
`
`DISEASE ACTIVITY A:-;D I:-.:FLAMMATIO:-.:
`PARA,"'ETERS
`CDAI scores did not change significantly during
`the treatment period (188·75 (5·65) before
`versus 185·13 (10·87) after treatment; Figure).
`Four patients stopped PTX treatment because
`of increased disease activity. None of the
`patients could discontinue prednisone during
`PTX treatment, five patients reduced pred(cid:173)
`nisone by 5 mg daily, and five patients increased
`prednisone use. Overall, prednisone use on a
`cumulative basis was not changed significantly
`by PTX treatment (15 (4·68) before (n= 16),
`versus 12·5 (2·5) after treatment (n=12)).
`Crohn's disease endoscopic index before
`and after treatment with PTX did not change
`significantly ( 14·9 (2·87) before treatment
`(n= 16) versus 14·8 (2·27) after treatment
`(n=12), Figure). All four patients who had to
`stop PTX treatment because of increased
`clinical activity, did have higher than average
`CDEIS scores at study begin (16·6 mean).
`
`EFFECTS <W PTX 0:-.: T:--IFo PRODL'CTIO:-.:
`In six patienrs TNFcx secretion by peripheral
`monocytes was studied before and at the end
`of PTX treatment (35·8 (13·9) pg/ml before
`treatment versus 13·2 ( 19) after treatment,
`non-significant). All patients had detectable
`TNFcx production before PTX, in five patients
`it decreased below
`the sensitivity range,
`although in two patients values were already at
`the lower detection limit before PTX treat(cid:173)
`ment. In one patient TNFcx release was not
`inhibited by PTX.
`Five healthy volunteers received oxpentifyl(cid:173)
`line 400 mg four times daily for a period of two
`days. Release of TNFcx by I 06 PBMC/ml
`stimulated with lipopolysaccharide ( 1 IJ..g/mJ
`for 24 hours) was significantly suppressed by in
`vivo PTX in comparison with baseline values
`( 1068 (198) before, 251 (122) pg/ml after two
`days oxpentifylline; p=0·008). In contrast,
`secretion of 1Llj3 (324 (66) versus 350 (62)
`pg/ml) and IL6 (2 124 (311) versus 2252 (225)
`pg/ml) did not change significantly.
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://gut.bmj.com/
`
` on October 2, 2017 - Published by
`
`group.bmj.com
`
`Oxpemifylline in Crohn 's disease
`
`473
`
`SOCIAL FUNCTION SCORES
`that co(cid:173)
`Social
`function scores showed
`treatment with oxpentifylline did not signifi(cid:173)
`cantly improve the patient's social functions
`except for sleep disturbance (week 0: 3·6
`(0·35) (n= 16), score week 4: 2·4 (0·29)
`(n=12), p=0·017). Upon detailed interviewing
`most patients indicated retrospectively that
`improvement of sleep was due to reduced
`muscle aches and reduced night sweat.
`
`Discussion
`in Crohn's
`Chronic inflammatory acuvtty
`disease may be sustained by the local release of
`proinflammatory cytokines from
`intestinal
`macrophages and T cells including secretion of
`TNFa, ILl~, and IL6.3 7 13 14 2<>-2 1 As TNFa is
`a potent proinflammatory mediator, which can
`be released by mononuclear phagocytes, acti(cid:173)
`vated T cell subpopulations as well as invading
`granulocytes42 the specific blockade of TNFa
`has been considered a promising approach for
`inflammation. 23 24
`intestinal
`treatment of
`Strong support for this hypothesis has been
`given by experimental treatment of chronic
`corticosteroid dependent Crohn's
`active
`disease with a one time application of a mono(cid:173)
`clonal antibody (cA2) directed against TNFa,
`which induced complete endoscopic and clini(cid:173)
`cal remission in eight of 10 patients within four
`weeks. 23 24 These findings may indicate a
`pivotal role ofTNFa in the pathophysiology of
`intestinal inflammation in Crohn's disease.
`To
`test
`this hypothesis we specifically
`blocked TNFa production by another agent,
`oxpentifylline, which is an established inhibitor
`of TNFa release in vitro as well as in vivo. 26-34
`Oxpentifylline has therefore been used in dose
`from 1200 to 2000 mgld in clinical trials to
`in vivo effects of
`suppress presumable
`TNFa. 27
`-29 33 However, in common with other
`phosphodiesterase inhibitors, PTX may have
`also additional contrainflamrnatory effects
`including a reduction of T lymphocyte cyto(cid:173)
`kine secretion (that is, lFN'Y) in vitro. 30 35
`In contrast with anti-TNFa cA2 antibody
`treatment no effect by PTX could be seen on
`clinical, laboratory or endoscopic activity. With
`the exception of sleep disturbance by the
`disease, none of the social functions assessed
`by a questionnaire improved. However, upon
`a detailed interview most patients indicated
`retrospectively that improvement of sleep was
`due to reduced muscle aches and reduced
`night sweat. These are both symptoms that
`may be attributed to raised TNFa levels.43
`The negative results of PTX treatment
`suggest that the mechanism of anti-TNFa anti(cid:173)
`body treatment (using the monoclonal anti(cid:173)
`body cA223 24 supplied by Centocor, PA, USA)
`in Crohn's disease may not only relate to a
`specific blockade of TNFa secretion. Other
`mechanisms including complement mediated
`lysis of cells expressing membrane bound
`TNFcx44 45 may possibly contribute to
`its
`efficacy. Thus, the cA2 antibody could also
`inhibit mediators apart from TNFa,46 which
`may sustain chronic intestinal inflammation.
`Taken together, our findings and the findings
`
`of Derkx et al23 24 may indicate that there are
`more key mediators than only TNFa in the
`inflammatory process in Crohn's disease.
`It is not known how much suppression of
`TNFa is actually induced in the mucosal
`compartment by either cA2 anti-TNF anti(cid:173)
`body treatment or by PTX. Moreover, the
`possibility exists that a substantial proportion
`of mucosal TNFa originates from T cells, and
`inhibition of TNF production by mucosal T
`cell populations by PTX has not been investi(cid:173)
`gated yet. Finally, although selection criteria
`were similar in both trials, Derxx et al23 24
`investigated in their uncontrolled pilot study a
`more active patient population (as indicated by
`the higher average CDAI)
`than we did.
`Therefore, patients' mucosal TNFa levels may
`have been different between both trials.
`Further studies are necessary to clarify the
`relevance of mucosal TNFa production in the
`pathophysiology of inflammation in Crohn's
`disease. In this pilot trial, oxpentifylline at a
`dose of 400 mg four times daily given over a
`period of four weeks was not effective in
`treating patients with corticosteroid dependent
`chronic active Crohn's disease. Further con(cid:173)
`trolled studies are warranted to examine the
`therapeutic potential of oxpentifylline and
`other TNFa inhibitors in Crohn's disease.
`
`The excellent technical help of Anna Maria Wenner and Stefan
`Eidner is gratefully acknowledged. This work was supported by
`a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SCHR
`51211-2) and by a grant from Syngen Pharma GmbH. Parts of
`the study were presented at the 97"' annual meeting of the
`American Gastroenterological Association in San Francisco
`(Ga.stroenttrology 1996; 110: A861 ).
`
`Mahida YR, Wu K, jewell DP. Enhanced production of
`interleu.kin
`1 -~ by mononuclear cells isolated from
`mucosa with active ulcerative colitis or CrQhn's disease.
`Gut 1989; 30: 835-8.
`2 Ugumsky M, Simon PL, Karmeli F, Rachmilewitz D. Role
`ofinterleukin 1 in inflammatory oowel disease - enhanced
`production during active disease. Gut 1990; 31: 686-9.
`3 MacDonald TI, Hutchings P, Choy MY, Murch S, Cooke A.
`Tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interferon-gamma
`production measured at the single cell level in normal and
`inflamed human intestine. Clin Exp lmmunol 1990; 81:
`301- 5.
`4 Schreiber S, MacDermott RP, Raedler A, Pinnau R,
`Bertovich M, Nash GS. Increased activation of intestinal
`lamina propria mononuclear cells in inflammatory bowel
`disease. Ga.srroenurowgy 1991; tOt: 1020-30.
`5 Schreiber S, Heinig T , Panzer U, Reinking R, Bouchard A,
`Stahl PO, tt aL Impaired response of activated mono(cid:173)
`nuclear phagocytes to interleukin 4 in inflammatory oowd
`disease. Ga.srroenrerowgy 1995; 108:21- 33.
`6 Stevens C, Walz G, Singaram C, Upman ML, Zanker B,
`Muggia A, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-a, interleukin-1 ~
`and interleukin 6 expression in inflammatory oowel
`disease. Dig Dis Sci 1992; 37: 818- 26.
`7 Isaacs KL, Sartor RB, Haeskil JS. Cytokine messenger RNA
`profiles in inflammatory bowel disease detected by
`polymerase chain reaction amplification. Ga.stroemtrology
`1992; 103: 1587-95.
`8 Dinarello CA, Wolff SM. The role of interleukin 1 in
`disease. N Eng/] Mtd 1993; 328: 106-13.
`9 Rampart M, De Smet W, Fiers W, Herman AG. Inflam(cid:173)
`matory properties of recombinant tumor necrosis in
`rabbit skin in vivo. J Exp Mtd 1989; 169: 2227-32.
`10 Kindler V, Sappino AP, GranGE, Piguet PF, Vassali P. The
`inducing role of rumor necrosis factor in the development
`of bactericidal granulomas during BCG infection. Cell
`1989; 56:731-40.
`11 Amiri P, Locksley RM, Parslow TG, Sadick M, Rector E,
`ruuer D, er al. Tumor necrosis factQr alpha restores
`granulomas and
`induces parasite
`egg-laying
`in
`schistosome-infected SCID mice. Natu,.. 1992; 356:
`604-7.
`12 Clauss M, Ryan J, Stem D. Modulation of endothelial cell
`hemostatic properties by TNF: Insights into the role of
`endothelium in the host response to inflammatory stimuli.
`In: Beutler B, ed. Tumor necrosis factor>: The molecults and
`th1ir ~erging role in m~dicint. New York: Raven Press,
`1992: 49-63.
`13 Sun XL, Hsueh W. Bowel necrosis induced by tumor
`necrosis factor in rats is mediated by platelet-activating
`factor. J Cli11/nvest 1988; 81: 1328- 31.
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://gut.bmj.com/
`
` on October 2, 2017 - Published by
`
`group.bmj.com
`
`474
`
`Bauditz, Haemling, Ormer, Lochs, Raedler, Schreiber
`
`14 Mullin JM, Snock KV. Effect of tumor necrosis factor on
`epithelial tight junctions and transepithelial permeability.
`Ca11cer Res 1990; SO: 2 1 i2-6.
`15 Deem RL, Shanahan F, Targan SR. Triggered human
`mucosal T cells release tumor necrosis factor-alpha and
`interferon-gamma which kill human colonic epithelial
`cells. Cli11 Exp lmmww/ 1991; 83: 79-84.
`16 Murch SH, Lamkin VA, Savage MO, Walker-Smith jA,
`MacDonald TT. Serum concentrations of release tumor
`necrosis factor-alpha in childhood chronic inflammatory
`bowel disease. Gur 199 1; 32: 913- i .
`17 Bracgger CP, Nicholls SW, Murch SH, Stephens S,
`MacDonald TT. Tumor necrosis factor alpha in stool as
`a marker of intestinal inflammation. La11cet 1992; 339:
`89-91.
`18 Schreiber S, Koop I, Bauditz j , :-\ikolaus S, Lochs H.
`Increased secretion of proinflammatory C)~okines by
`LPMNC is a predictor for relapse of iBD. Gawwmtrvlog:.·
`1995; 108: A332.
`19 Stevens C, Walz G, Singaram C, Lipman ML, Zanker B,
`Muggia A, <r al. Tumor necrosis factor a, interleu kin I f3
`and interleukin 6 expression in inflammator)· bowel
`disease. Dig Dis Sci 1992; 37: 818- 26.
`20 Capello .'vi, Keshav S, Prince C, jewell DP, Gordon S.
`Detection of mRNAs for macrophage products in inflam(cid:173)
`matory bowel disease by in situ hybridisation. Gut 1992;
`33: 1214-9.
`2 1 Breese Ej,MichieCA,NichollsSW,MurchSH, WilliamsCB,
`D omizio P, eta/. Tumor necrosis factor a-producing cells
`in the intestinal mucosa of children with inflammatory
`bowel disease. Gastroemerology 1994; 106: 1455-65.
`22 Hyams jS, Treem WR, Eddy E, Wyzga N, Moore RE.
`Tumor necrosis factor alpha is not elevated in children
`with inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroememl
`1\'111r 1991; 12: 233-6.
`23 Derkx B, Taminiau ), Radema S, Stronkhorst A, Wortel C,
`Tytgat G, et al. Tumor-necrosis-factor antibody rreatment
`in Crohn's disease. La11w 1993; 342: 173-4.
`24 van Dullemen HM, van Devemer SjH, Hommes 0\X',
`Bijl HA, jansen j, T~gat GN), Woody J, rt a/. Treatment
`of Crohn's disease with anti-tumor necrosis factor
`chimeric antibody (cA2). Gastromrerology 1995; 109:
`129-35.
`25 Stack W, MannS, Roy A, Heath P, Sop .... .;th M, Freeman j ,
`et al. The effects of CDP571 , an engineered human lgG4
`anti-TNF-alpha antibody in Crohn's disease. Gastro(cid:173)
`tmerology 1996; 110 : A lO IS.
`26 Strieter RM, Remick DG, Ward PA, Spengler Rl';,
`Lynch )P, Larrick J, <I al. Cellular and molecular
`regulation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha production by
`pentoxifylline. 8iocltem 8iopltys Res Commu11 1988; ISS:
`1230-6.
`27 Bianco jA, Appelbaum FR, ~emunaitis j, Almgren j ,
`Andrews F, Kettner P, et a/. Phasc 1- 11
`trial of
`pemoxifylline for the prevention of transplant-related
`toxicities following bone marrow transplantation. Blood
`1991; 78: 1205- 11.
`28 Dezubc Bj, Pardee AB, Chapman B, Beckett LA, KorvickjA,
`Novick WJ, eta/. Pentoxifylline decreases tumor necrosis
`factor expression and serum triglyccrides in people with
`AIDS. Joumal tJ/ Aquir.td lmmrmodefici~ncy Syudrom,·
`1993; 6: 787- 94.
`29 Neuner P, Klosner G,Schauer E, Pourmojib N , Macheiner \X',
`Grunwald C, .,, a/. Pcntoxifylline in vivo down-regulates
`the release ofiL-1 ~. !L-6, JL.8 and tumor necrosis factor
`by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
`lmnumolog:.· 1994; 83: 262- i.
`
`30 Tilg H , Eibl B, Piehl M, Gachter A, Herold M, Brankova j ,
`et a/. Immune response modulation by pentoxifylline in
`vitro. Tra11splamarion 1993; 56: 196-20 I.
`31 van Leenen D , Vanderpol! T, Levi M , Tencate H, van
`Deventer SjH, Hack CE, it a/. Pentoxifyllinc attenuates
`neutrophil activation in experimental endotoxinemia in
`chimpanzees.] lmmuuo/1993; lSI: 2318- 25.
`32 Breuille D , Farge MC, Rose F, Amal M, Auaix D, Obled C.
`Pentoxifylline decreases body weight loss and muscle
`protein wasting characteristics of sepsis. Am J Physiol
`1993; 265: E660-0.
`33 Attal M, Huguet F, Rubie H, Charlet )P, Schlaifer D,
`Huynh A, et a/. Prevention of regimen-related toxicities
`after bone marrow transplantation by pentoxifylline: a
`prospective, randomized trial. Blomi 1993; 82: 732-6.
`34 Han J, Thompson P, Beutler B. Dexamethasone and pen(cid:173)
`toxifylline
`inhibit endotoxin-induced cachectin/tumor
`factor synthesis at separate points in
`the signalling
`pathway.] ExpMid 1990; 172:391-4.
`35 Kovach NL, Lindgren CG, Fcfer A, Thompson )A,
`Yednock T, Harlan JM. Pentoxifyllinc inhibits in tegrin(cid:173)
`mediated adherence of interleukin-2 activated human
`peripheral blood lymphocytes to human umbilical vein
`cells, matrix components, and cultured tumor cells. Blood
`1994; 84: 2234-42.
`36 Summers RW, Switz DM, Sessions IT j r, Becktel JM,
`Best WR, Kem j Jr, <t at. >lational cooperative Crohn's
`disease Study: Results of drug treatment. Gasrrc~;~memlog:.·
`1979; 77:847-69.
`37 .'vlalchow H, Ewe K, Brandes JW, Goebell H, Ehms H,
`Sommer H, <I al. European cooperative Crohn's disease
`study (ECCDS): Results of drug treatment. Gastro(cid:173)
`~merology 1984; 86: 249- 66.
`38 Robinson M , Hanauer S, Hoop R, Zbrozek A, Wilkinson C.
`.'vlcsalamine capsules enhance the quality of life for
`patients with ulcerative colitis. Aliment Phanuacol Ther
`I 994; 8: 27-34.
`39 GETAID represented by Mary jY and Modigliani R.
`Development and validation of an endoscopic index of the
`severity for Crohn's disease: A prospective, muhiccntn.:
`stud)'. Gut 1989; 30: 983-9.
`-10 Reinecker HC, Steffen M, Witthlift T , Pflueger!, Schreiber S,
`.'vlacDermott RP, "' a/. Enhanced secretion of tumor
`necrosis factor-alpha, IL-6 and IL- l beta by isolated
`lamina propria mononuclear cells from patients with
`ulcerati,·e colitis and Crohn's disease. Cfi,. £xp lmmwwl
`1993; 94: 174-81.
`41 Sachs L. A11g.rn:audu Swtistik. ith ed. Heidelberg: Springer,
`1992.
`42 >likolaus S, Hampe J, Bauditz ), Ortner .'vi, Reichelt E,
`role of granuloc)'tes
`in
`Lochs H, "' a/. Pivotal
`immunorcgulation in inflammatory bowel disc:!ase? Gw
`1996; 39 (suppl 3): A2 .
`43 Dinarello CA. Interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor and
`their naturally occuring antagonists during hemodialysis.
`Kidney lm Supp/ 1992; 38: S68-77.
`-14 Kriegler .'vi, Perez C, DeFay K, Albert I, Lu SD. A no,·cl
`form of TN F/cachectin is a cell surface cytotoxic trans(cid:173)
`membrane protein:
`ramifications
`for
`the complex
`physiology ofT!'< F. Cd/1988; 53: 45- 53.
`-15 Scallon Bj , .'vloorc ,'v\A, Trinh DM, Ghrayeb J. Chimeric
`anti-T>;F-u monoclonal amibody, cA2 binds
`re(cid:173)
`combinant transmembrane NF-u and activates immune
`effector functions. Cywki11< 1995; 7: 25 I -9.
`-16 Todoro,· P, Cariuk P, McDevitt T , Coles B, Fearon K.
`Tisdale .\.!. Characterization of a cancer cachectic factor.
`.\'<Jtur.; 1996: 379: 739- -12.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket