throbber
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL Of GASTROENTEROLOOY
`Copyright© 1998 by Am. Coil. of Gastroenterology
`Published by Elsevier Science Inc.
`
`Editorials
`
`Vol. 93, No. 3, 1998
`ISSN 0002-9270/98/$19.00
`PIT S0002-9270(98)00002-l
`
`MENTAL STRESS AND PEPTIC ULCERS: AN
`EARTHSHAKING ASSOCIATION
`
`Stress can be defined as the biological response to an
`adverse physical or mental stimulus that disturbs an _organ(cid:173)
`ism's homeostasis. The term stress (or stressor) ts also
`sometimes used to refer to the stimuli that elicit the biolog(cid:173)
`ical responses (1 ). If the compensating responses are inad(cid:173)
`equate or inappropriate, stress may cause an organism to
`experience distress, disorder, and/or disease.
`Major physical stressors (e.g., bums, trauma, surgery,
`multiorgan failure) clearly can trigger biological responses
`that often result in acute gastric ulcers that bleed ("acute
`stress ulcers") (2). What is less clear is the relationship
`between major mental stressors, biological responses to
`these stressors, and ulcers (3). A cause-and-effect relation(cid:173)
`ship between mental stressors and peptic ulcer disease has
`long been accepted by the public, and individual case stud(cid:173)
`ies support this link (4). However, carefully controlled stud(cid:173)
`ies testing cause-and-effect have been difficult to perform.
`Nevertheless, there is some evidence that mental stress may
`lead to acute ulcer formation.
`For example, during the devastating air raids of London
`in 1940 and 1941, British physicians observed an increase of
`>50% in the incidence of acute perforated gastric ulcer,
`and, to a lesser extent, duodenal ulcer, compared with ulcer
`perforation rates in the same 16 hospitals in the years before
`or after the raids. The authors proposed that anxiety was
`responsible for the increase in ulcer perforation rates (5, 6).
`Weiner et al. (7) performed psychological tests and upper
`GI barium examinations in 120 men (63 serum pepsinogen
`hypersecretors and 57 hyposecretors) before their entering
`basic military training. Hypersecretors tended to be more
`dependent, immature, anxious, and depressed than hypose(cid:173)
`cretors. Four of the hypersecretors had radiologic evidence
`of duodenal ulcer disease at baseline. Upper GI x-rays were
`then repeated 8 to 16 wk into basic training. Five more
`hypersecretors had developed duodenal ulcers.
`More than a decade ago, Walker and I reported that male
`veterans hospitalized for bleeding or perforated duodenal or
`gastric ulcers were no more likely to have had recent stress(cid:173)
`ful events than were patients hospitalized concurrently for
`symptomatic kidney stones or gallstones (8). However, we
`found that ulcer patients had fewer skills and less social
`support to cope with these events than did their counterparts
`with other diseases. Ulcer patients were also more likely
`
`Received Dec. 5, 1997; accepted Dec. 12, 1997.
`
`291
`
`than were patients with stones to have interpreted events
`negatively, and to demonstrate anxiety and/or depression
`(distress). We also found a direct relationship between the
`degree of emotional disturbance and the elevation of serum
`pepsinogen concentrations in ulcer patients (9).
`In the 1980s, the discovery of H. pylori and its close
`relationship with peptic ulcer disease forced us to reconsider
`the role of mental stress in the pathogenesis of peptic ulcers,
`and rightly so. Eradicating H. pylori from the stomach with
`antimicrobial drugs led to very low duodenal ulcer recur(cid:173)
`rence rates regardless of life stresses ( 10), and cure of ulcer
`disease became possible for the first time in history. Al(cid:173)
`though the role of H. pylori gastritis in duodenal and gastric
`ulcer pathogenesis is now firmly established, the basic
`mechanism(s) by which H. pylori leads to these ulcers is not
`certain. H. pylori gastritis is usually acquired in childhood,
`but ulcers in infected individuals usually occur after a la(cid:173)
`tency period of years or even decades, and more often occur
`in the duodenum than in the stomach (11). Furthermore, the
`natural history of untreated or placebo-treated H. pylori(cid:173)
`associated duodenal and gastric ulcem is that they heal
`spontaneously, even though the H. pylori gastritis persists,
`only to recur weeks, months, or even years later. For in(cid:173)
`fected individuals there must be events that trigger these
`episodes of acute ulcer formation that are often accompa(cid:173)
`nied by serious complications such as bleeding or perfora(cid:173)
`tion. Ingestion of NSAIDs is one well established trigger for
`acute ulcer formation (12), but many ulcer episodes are not
`associated with NSAID use. Other triggers, such as mental
`stressors, could contribute to episodic ulcer formation in H.
`pylori-infected individuals. Also, because a considerable
`proportion of individuals with duodenal ulcers ( 10-20%) or
`gastric ulcers (20-40%) is not infected with H. pylori (11),
`some of their ulcers could be caused by mental stress.
`In this issue, Aoyama et at. report on the incidence of
`peptic ulcers after a major earthquake in the Hanshin-Awaji
`region of Japan in January of 1995 (13). This earthquake
`was the most devastating earthquake in Japan in nearly 75
`years, killing more than 5,000 people and leaving more than
`300,000 homeless. In this retrospective study, the investi(cid:173)
`gators recorded the number of patients with gastric or du(cid:173)
`odenal ulcers diagnosed by endoscopy during the 8-wk
`period after earthquake and compared this with the number
`of ulcers diagnosed in the same 61 hospitals during the same
`8-wk period the year before the earthquake. Data were
`analyzed from 23 hospitals near the epic·~nter (approximate(cid:173)
`ly 7 on the Richter scale), from 15 hospitals in the surround-
`
`

`

`292
`
`EDITORIALS
`
`ing area (Richter 5-6), and from 23 hospitals in a relatively
`spared peripheral area (Richter <4). No data were presented
`on ulcer perforations, presumably because ulcer perforations
`were diagnosed by surgeons rather than by endoscopists.
`There are a number of findings from this study that
`suggest that the stress of the earthquake may have affected
`the incidence, clinical presentation, and/or severity of ulcer
`disease. First, although 5,000 fewer endoscopies were per(cid:173)
`formed after the earthquake than in the previous year (33%
`decrease), the total number of ulcers diagnosed was similar
`(465 ulcers in 1994 and 454 in 1995), suggesting that the
`incidence of ulcers increased as a result of the natural
`disaster. Nevertheless, these data do not prove that the
`incidence of ulcers increased, inasmuch as it is possible
`(although not probable) that most individuals with symp(cid:173)
`tomatic ulcers after the earthquake were triaged to receive
`endoscopy.
`The clinical presentation of ulcer disease may have
`changed as well. After the earthquake, there was a shift to a
`higher ratio of gastric ulcers relative to duodenal ulcers,
`especially in the hardest hit regions, where this ratio in(cid:173)
`creased from <2:1 to >3:1. Furthermore, patients diag(cid:173)
`nosed with gastric ulcers after the earthquake were, on
`average, 10 yr older than in the previous year, whereas the
`ages of patients diagnosed with duodenal ulcers did not
`differ from year to year. There was also a trend for gastric
`ulcers diagnosed after the earthquake to more often be the
`initial ulcer episode for a given patient. These data suggest,
`but again do not prove, that the earthquake increased the
`incidence of gastric ulcers, especially in the elderly popu(cid:173)
`lation. Alternatively, the earthquake stress may have shifted
`the location of ulcers from the duodenum to the stomach,
`without necessarily increasing overall peptic ulcer inci(cid:173)
`dence.
`Last, the earthquake appeared to affect the severity of
`ulcer disease. The number of bleeding ulcers diagnosed by
`endoscopy nearly doubled, from 112 before to 222 after the
`earthquake. This increase was accounted for by 97 extra
`bleeding gastric ulcers and 13 extra bleeding duodenal ul(cid:173)
`cers. The increase in bleeding ulcers was not explained by
`increased NSAID use, which was low in both years (4-5%).
`The prevalence of H. pylori infection in ulcer patients was
`also similar before and after the earthquake (80-85%).
`Importantly, the increased incidence of bleeding ulcers was
`most apparent in the hardest hit areas. For example, near the
`epicenter, bleeding gastric and duodenal ulcers increased by
`186% and 138%, respectively, whereas no substantial
`changes were observed in the most remote hospitals. In the
`year before the earthquake, only nine patients with bleeding
`ulcers received blood transfusions (1.1 patients per week),
`whereas 63 ulcer patients received transfusions after the
`earthquake (7.9 patients per week).
`This sentinel study by Aoyama et al. suggests that the
`emotional havoc produced by the Hanshin-Awaji earth(cid:173)
`quake changed the clinical presentation and severity of
`peptic ulcer disease in this region of Japan. The findings
`
`AJG --Vol. 93, No. 3, 1998
`
`complement the data on ulcer perforations during the Lon(cid:173)
`don air raids in World War II, and lend further credence to
`the concept that major mental stresHors increase the inci(cid:173)
`dence of serious peptic ulcer disease. It will be important to
`confirm the findings of these studies prospectively and also
`to evaluate whether this type of stre~.s-associated ulcer can
`be prevented. Physicians and other first aid workers should
`be alert to an increased risk of bleeding gastric (and prob(cid:173)
`ably duodenal) ulcers in the early we;:ks after natural disas(cid:173)
`ters, even in persons who have sustained no physical inju(cid:173)
`ries. Our concept of acute stress ulcers needs to be
`broadened to include those associated with emotional as
`well as physical stressors.
`
`Mark Feldman, M.D.
`Department of Internal Medicine
`Dallas VA Medical Center and The University of
`Texas Southwestern Medical Center
`Dallas, Texas
`
`REFERENCES.
`
`l. Dorland's Medical Dictionary, 27th edition. Philadelphia: WB Saun(cid:173)
`ders, 1988.
`2. Soli AH. Peptic ulcer and its complications. In: Feldman M, Schar(cid:173)
`schmid! BF, Sleisenger MH, eds. Gastrointestinal and liver disease.
`Pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, 6th edition. Philadelphia:
`WB Saunders, 1997:620-78.
`3. Walker PM, Feldman M. Psychosomatic aspects of peptic ulcer dis(cid:173)
`ease: A multifactorial model of stress. Ga;troenterol Inter 1992;5:33-
`47.
`4. Peters MN, Richardson CT. Stressful life events, acid hypersecretion
`and ulcer disease. Gastroenterology 1983:84:114-9.
`5. Stewart DN, de R. Winser DM. Incidence of perforated peptic ulcer.
`Effect of heavy air-raids. Lancet 1942;11:259-61.
`6. Spicer CC, Stewart DN, de R. Winser DM. Perforated peptic ulcer
`during the period of heavy air-raids. Lan<:et 1944;1: 14.
`7. Weiner H, Thaler M, Reiser MF, et al. E1iology of duodenal ulcer. I.
`Relation of specific psychological characteristics to rate of gastric
`secretion (serum pepsinogen). Psychosom Med 1957;19:1-10.
`8. Feldman M, Walker P, Green JL, et al. Life events stress and psycho(cid:173)
`social factors in men with peptic ulcer disease. A multidimensional
`case-controlled study. Gastroenterology 1986;91: 1370-9.
`9. Walker P, Luther J, Samloff IM, eta!. Life event stress and psycho(cid:173)
`social factors in men with peptic ulcer disease. Gastroenterology
`1988;94:323-30.
`10. Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disea!.e. NIH Concensus Confer(cid:173)
`ence. JAMA 1994;272:65-9.
`II. Peterson WL, Graham DY. Helicobacter pylori. In: Feldman M, Schar(cid:173)
`schmid! BF, Sleisenger MH, eds. Gastrointestinal and liver disease.
`Pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, 6th edition. Philadelphia:
`WB Saunders, 1997;604-19.
`12. Cryer B. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gastrointestinal
`disease. In: Feldman M, Scharschmidt BF, Sleisenger MH, eds.
`Gastrointestinal and liver disease. Pathophysiology, diagnosis,
`management, 6th edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1997;343-
`57.
`13. Aoyama N, Kinoshita Y, Fujimoto S, et al. Peptic ulcers after the
`Hanshin-Awaji earthquake: Increased in<:idence of bleeding gastric
`ulcers. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:311-•5.
`
`Reprint requests and correspondence: Mark Feldman, M.D., VA Med(cid:173)
`ical Center (Ill), 4500 South Lancaster Road, Dallas, TX 75216.
`
`

`

`AJG- March 1998
`
`HOW TO TREAT THE CYTOMEGALOVIRUS
`TROLL
`
`Cytomegalovirus was once called the "troll of transplan(cid:173)
`tation." Trolls are mythical beings that wait in hiding be(cid:173)
`neath a bridge until an opportune time to jump up and attack
`an unsuspecting traveler. Like a troll, cytomegalovirus is
`hiding out in most healthy adults and almost all HIV(cid:173)
`infected patients. The opportune time for jumping out and
`causing clinical disease is when the immune system is
`compromised, either by immunosuppressive drugs (CMV is
`the most important infectious cause of complications and
`death in organ transplant recipients) or in the acquired
`immunodeficiency syndrome (CMV disease occurs in about
`one-third of AIDS patients during the course of their dis(cid:173)
`ease). The attack can be on a variety of organs, but all parts
`of the gastrointestinal tract are at risk. The attack causes
`erosions or ulcerations in the gastrointestinal mucosa and is
`manifested by symptoms referable to the level of the gas(cid:173)
`trointestinal tract involved (i.e., odynophagia or substernal
`pain for an esophageal ulcer; epigastric pain or melena for
`a gastric or duodenal lesion; lower abdominal pain, diarrhea,
`and hematochezia for colonic disease) (1 ). The attack can
`precipitate an abdominal emergency such as bowel perfo(cid:173)
`ration, appendicitis, or cholecystitis. But most often the
`symptoms are slowly progressive and require endoscopic
`diagnosis and medical treatment.
`The controversies about endoscopic diagnosis have been
`reviewed (2). Cultures, antigen assays, and DNA amplifi(cid:173)
`cation techniques performed on blood or urine do not reli(cid:173)
`ably identify patients with active CMV disease in some solid
`organ (3). Multiple biopsies (at least 10) of endoscopic
`lesions should be stained with hematoxylin and eosin and
`carefully examined by experienced pathologists for the
`characteristic cytopathic effect ( 4 ). Immunohistochemical
`staining may be helpful in some cases but is not as important
`as multiple biopsies routinely stained and carefully
`searched. Viral culture has little role. PCR on the biopsy
`specimen (5, 6) shows great potential but is still a research
`tool because of limited availability. There is a dream of
`using PCR-based assays on the blood as a key component in
`the prediction, diagnosis, and treatment of CMV disease, but
`this has yet to be realized (3).
`Cytomegalovirus intestinal disease is treated with either
`of two intravenous drugs: ganciclovir or foscamet. They
`inhibit CMV DNA synthesis by slightly different mecha(cid:173)
`nisms. Published practice guidelines (7) and technical re(cid:173)
`ports (8) indicate that both drugs are equivalent, that induc(cid:173)
`tion at full dose for 3-4 weeks should be used, that the
`choice of drug should be based on toxicity profiles, that
`maintenance should be used after first relapse, that relapse
`can be treated with the same drug, and that further recur(cid:173)
`rence or refractoriness should be treated by switching drugs
`or by using a combination of both drugs. These guidelines
`
`Received Oct. 23, 1997; accepted Oct. 23, 1997.
`
`EDITORIALS
`
`293
`
`are based on published uncontrolled trials that have shown
`that both ganciclovir and foscamet yield clinical improve(cid:173)
`ment in approximately 75% of affected patients. A random(cid:173)
`ized comparison showed similar result1; (9). Relapse rate
`after effective induction therapy is 20-50%. Maintenance
`therapy with once-daily infusions of approximately half the
`induction dose probably delays recurrence, but even with
`maintenance therapy gastrointestinal CMV disease can re(cid:173)
`lapse or progress (9, 10). Because of the high relapse rate,
`some physicians advise maintenance therapy for all patients
`after induction therapy to prevent or delay relapse. The
`disadvantages of placing all patients on maintenance are
`drug toxicity, the need for continuous intravenous access,
`patient inconvenience, and cost. Treating relapses with full
`dose ganciclovir or foscamet is effective in most patients
`( 11 ). The concurrent use of both drugs may lead to response
`in 90% of patients who fail to respond to either or both of
`the drugs when they are used alone (12).
`The study reported by Parente et al. in the current issue of
`the Journal supports several of the practice guidelines on the
`treatment of AIDS-related esophageal CMV disease (13).
`When choosing between the two drugs the main consider(cid:173)
`ation is not efficacy but rather toxicity, convenience, and
`cost. For example, a patient with cytop~nia, or mandatory
`use of other bone marrow toxic drugs, or a recent bone
`marrow transplant may be treated wi,:h foscamet. Con(cid:173)
`versely, a patient with renal insufficiency, mandatory use of
`other nephrotoxic drugs, or a recent renal transplant, will
`likely be treated with ganciclovir. One of the reasons that
`Parente et al. were unable to enroll more patients in their
`study was because almost one-half of the CMV infected
`patients could not ethically be considered for both drugs.
`Side effects occur in one-half of both ganciclovir and fos(cid:173)
`carnet treated patients (9), but switching to the alternative
`drug only is mandated in less than 1% of patients (14) if
`appropriate treatment algorithms are followed (15). Patient
`convenience is another issue. Ganciclovir requires a 30-min
`infusion time and foscamet a 2-h infusion time after a 1-h
`saline load (500-1000 cc of normal saline). Annual costs of
`treatment, including administration and monitoring for tox(cid:173)
`icity, can vary between $50,000 and $100,000 (16).
`The study by Parente et al. shows in the gastrointestinal
`tract what was demonstrated for CMV retinitis quite a few
`years ago: ganciclovir and foscamet have similar efficacy
`and safety (14). Because CMV retinids is 10 times as
`common in AIDS than gastrointestinal CMV disease (17), it
`is not surprising that ophthalmologists and their infectious
`disease colleagues are ahead in other CMV -related areas as
`well, especially in the areas of new dmg testing, mainte(cid:173)
`nance, and treating relapse. Because CMV is such a com(cid:173)
`mon problem for organ transplant services, transplant phy(cid:173)
`sicians have also made important strides in the diagnosis and
`prevention of CMV disease. Gastroenterologists should be
`aware of the following issues on which data and experience
`are being collected.
`Failure of therapy: Approximately 20% of patients re-
`
`

`

`294
`
`EDITORIALS
`
`ported by Parente et al. (as with most other series) did not
`respond to drug treatment. Experience from studies in
`AIDS-related CMV retinitis would suggest that there is no
`single explanation for failure to respond (17). Although
`resistant strains to both foscarnet and ganciclovir have been
`identified ( 18), the vast majority of therapeutic failures are
`not associated with resistant strains (19). Failure of therapy
`must be related to a combination of multiple causes such as
`drug levels (17, 20), compliance, length of therapy, misdi(cid:173)
`agnosis, or, most importantly, progressive immune defi(cid:173)
`ciency. Treatment is likely to be more successful when there
`is a return to more normal immunologic function, as in a
`transplant recipient. Immune therapy, in the form of mono(cid:173)
`clonal anti-CMV antibodies, combined with either foscarnet
`or ganciclovir, are more effective than either drug by itself
`(16).
`Relapsing disease: Parente eta[. don't tell us how they
`managed the patients that responded to therapy. The prob(cid:173)
`lem of relapsing disease in spite of maintenance therapy
`continues to be studied in patients with AIDS-related CMV
`retinitis (17, 21). Three foscarnet/ganciclovir strategies for
`relapsing disease while on maintenance were compared:
`repeat induction with the same drug, switching to the other
`drug, or giving both drugs in combination. The combination
`was superior in halting progression but no different in sur(cid:173)
`vival or sight sparing (22). The combination was also ex(cid:173)
`pensive, time consuming, and toxic.
`New drugs and drug formulations are emerging to deal
`with relapsing disease (17). Although the oral bioavailabil(cid:173)
`ity of ganciclovir is only 6-9%, an oral formulation is
`available, which, at the recommended dose ( 1000 mg 3
`times daily) achieves blood levels close to the median ef(cid:173)
`fective inhibitory dose of most clinical isolates (19). It is
`almost as effective as intravenous ganciclovir in mainte(cid:173)
`nance therapy for CMV retinitis (19, 23), but the frequency
`of neutropenia and catheter related infections is reduced
`(17). Cidofovir, a nucleotide analogue with very potent
`activity against CMV in humans, has been used to prevent
`the progression of CMV retinitis in AIDS patients (24, 25).
`It is equivalent to ganciclovir and foscarnet for this purpose
`(24, 25). Its advantage is that it can be given as a weekly
`intravenous infusion because it has a long intracellular half(cid:173)
`life and prolonged effect against CMV (24). The drug is
`nephrotoxic (17).
`Monitoring treatment: Parente et al. used quantitative
`PCR and quantitative antigen assays (infected cells per
`200,000 polymorphonuclear leukocytes) to monitor the
`treatment. Measurement of the disappearance of leukocyte
`or serum CMV DNA positivity as a measure of therapeutic
`response has been previously studied, but not in association
`with gastrointestinal infection (3). Quantitative PCR has
`shown that standard therapy is associated with a fall in the
`amount of CMV genome in gastrointestinal tissues, but that
`20% of patients don't demonstrate such a fall (26). These
`patients are at higher risk of relapse. PCR predicts relapse of
`GI CMV infection in intestinal transplant recipients (5).
`
`AJG --Vol. 93, No.3, 1998
`
`Prevention: The CMV status of donor and recipient are
`the strongest predictors of survival in liver transplant pa(cid:173)
`tients (27). Therefore, studies have been done to show how
`to prevent disease in this population. Intravenous ganciclo(cid:173)
`vir prevents serious CMV disease m patients after bone
`marrow, cardiac, and liver transplantation (28-30). In AIDS
`patients with low CD4 counts, a year of oral ganciclovir
`reduced the incidence of CMV disease by 50% compared
`with placebo (31). Resistance to ganciclovir was not iden(cid:173)
`tified excessively and toxicity was mild. Treatment required
`taking 12 capsules per day at an annual drug cost of
`$14,000. There are no studies that Hhow that prophylaxis
`yields better outcomes than diagnosis of disease followed by
`treatment. Routine use of oral ganciclovir as prophylaxis has
`not been recommended (32).
`Preemptive treatment: Preemptive therapy is differenti(cid:173)
`ated from nontargeted prophylaxis by selecting a population
`at greatest risk based on some clinical measurement such as
`type of immunosuppression, antibody status, viremia, DNA
`level, etc. (33). This eliminates the need to give prophylactic
`therapy to everyone (saving money, toxicity, and inconve(cid:173)
`nience) while preventing the great cost, morbidity, and
`mortality of treating active CMV di~.ease. Monoclonal an(cid:173)
`tibody-based stains of peripheral blood polymorphonuclear
`leukocytes for CMV antigen or quantitative PCR (like the
`tests used by Parente et al.) may provide a quantitative
`expression of risk of CMV in the transplant setting, and the
`strategy of PCR or antigen-based assay directed preemptive
`therapy is emerging (34-37). In AIDS, there are no vali(cid:173)
`dated tests that accurately predict who will get CMV disease
`(32); however, studies are being done (38-40).
`Highly active antiretroviral therapy: A final but impor(cid:173)
`tant consideration is the role of highly active antiretroviral
`therapy in dealing with AIDS-related CMV infection. The
`impact of this treatment on the frequency and severity of
`other opportunistic infections has been impressive. AIDS
`diarrhea, along with its causative agents, is dramatically
`decreasing in incidence and severity (personal unpublished
`observations). Although such therapy may change many
`things about the presentation, natural history, and response
`to therapy of AIDS-related CMV infe,;tions (41), improving
`the immune status of the patient may well be the most
`important way to drive the CMV troll back under the bridge
`for an extended period of time.
`Richard W. Goodgame, M.D.
`Baylor College of Medicine
`Gastroenterology Section
`Houston, Texas
`
`REFERENCES
`
`I. Goodgame R. Gastrointestinal cytomegalovirus disease. Ann Intern
`Med 1993;199.
`2. Bonacini M, Laine L. Detection of cyton:egalovirus in the gastroin(cid:173)
`testinal tract: Seeking a gold standard. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:
`332-3.
`3. Cartwright C. Laboratory diagnosis. In: Masur H, ed. Advances in the
`
`

`

`AJG- March 1998
`
`management of AIDS-related cytomegalovirus retinitis. Ann Intern
`Med 1996;125:126-36.
`4. Wilcox C, Straub R, Schwartz D. Prospective evaluation of biopsy
`number for the diagnosis of viral esophagitis in patients with HIV
`infection and esophageal ulcer. Gastrointestinal Endosc 1996;44:587-
`93.
`5. Kusne S, Manez RF, St. George K, et al. Use of DNA amplification for
`the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus enteritis after intestinal transplanta(cid:173)
`tion. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1121-8.
`6. Cotte L, Drouet E, Bissuel F, et al. Diagnostic value of amplification
`of human cytomegalovirus DNA from gastrointestinal biopsies from
`human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. J Clin Microbiol
`1993;31:2066-9.
`7. Dieterich D, Wilcox C. Diagnosis and treatment of esophageal diseases
`associated with HIV infection. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:2265-9.
`8. Wilcox C, Rabeneck L, Friedman S. AGA technical review: Malnu(cid:173)
`trition and cachexia, chronic diarrhea, and hepatobiliary disease in
`patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Gastroenter(cid:173)
`ology 1996;111:1724-52.
`9. Blanshard C, Benhamou Y, Dohin E, et al. Treatment of AIDS(cid:173)
`associated gastrointestinal cytomegalovirus infection with foscarnet
`and ganciclovir: A randomized comparison. J Infect Dis 1995;167:
`622-6.
`I 0. Erice A, Chou S, Biron K, et al. Progressive disease due to ganciclovir(cid:173)
`resistant cytomegalovirus in immunocompromised hosts. N Eng!
`J Med 1989;320:289-93.
`II. Dieterich D, Poles M, Dicker M, et al. Foscarnet treatment of cyto(cid:173)
`megalovirus gastrointestinal infections in acquired immunodeficiency
`syndrome patients who have failed ganciclovir induction. Am J Gas(cid:173)
`troenterol 1993;88:542-8.
`12. Dieterich D, Poles M, Lew E, et al. Concurrent use of ganciclovir and
`foscarnet to treat cytomegalovirus infection in AIDS patients. J Infect
`Dis 1993;167:1184-8.
`13. Parente F, Bianchi Porro G, Group TICS. Treatment of cytomegalo(cid:173)
`virus esophagitis in patients with acquired immune deficiency syn(cid:173)
`drome: A randomized controlled study of foscarnet versus ganciclovir.
`Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:317-22.
`14. Studies of Ocular Complications of AIDS Research Group, AIDS
`Clinical Trials Group. Mortality in patients with the acquired immu(cid:173)
`nodeficiency syndrome treated with either foscarnet or ganciclovir for
`cytomegalovirus retinitis. N Eng! J Med 1992;326:213-20.
`15. Studies of Ocular Complications of AIDS Research Group, AIDS
`Clinical Trials Group. Morbidity and toxic effects associated with
`ganciclovir or foscarnet therapy in a randomized cytomegalovirus
`retinitis trial. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:65-74.
`16. Polls M. Systemic treatment. In: Masur H, ed. Advances in the man(cid:173)
`agement of AIDS-related cytomegalovirus retinitis. Ann Intern Med
`1996;125: 126-36.
`17. Jacobson M. Treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with the
`acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Eng! J Med 1997;337:105-
`14.
`18. Dunn J, MacCumber M, Forman M, et al. Viral sensitivity testing in
`patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis clinically resistant to foscarnet
`or ganciclovir. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;119:587-96.
`19. Crumpacker C. Ganciclovir. N Eng! J Med 1996;335:721-9.
`20. Piketty C, Bardin C, Gilquin J, et al. Low plasma concentrations
`achieved with conventional schedules of administration of ganciclovir
`in patients with AIDS. J Infect Dis 1996;174:188-90.
`21. Young L. Therapy for cytomegalovirus retinitis: Still no silver lining.
`JAMA 1996;275:149-50.
`22. Studies of Ocular Complications of AIDS Research Group, AIDS
`Clinical Trials Group. Combination foscarnet and ganciclovir therapy
`vs. monotherapy for the treatment of relapsed cytomegalovirus retinitis
`in patients with AIDS: The cytomegalovirus retreatment trial. Arch
`Ophthalmol 1996;114:23-33.
`23. Drew W, Ives D, Lalezari JEA. Oral ganciclovir as maintenance
`treatment for cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with AIDS. N Eng!
`J Med 1995;333:615-20.
`24. Studies of Ocular Complications of AIDS Research Group, AIDS
`Clinical Trials Group. Parenteral cidofovir for cytomegalovirus reti(cid:173)
`nitis in patients with AIDS: The HPMPC peripheral cytomegalovirus
`retinitis trial. Ann Intern Med 1997:126:264-74.
`25. Lalezari J, Stagg R, Kuppermann B, et al. Intravenous cidofovir for
`
`EDITORIALS
`
`295
`
`peripheral cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with AIDS. Ann Intern
`Med 1997;126:257-63.
`26. Cotte L, Drouet E, Bailly F, et al. Cytomegalovirus DNA level on
`biopsy specimens during treatment of cytomegalovirus gastrointestinal
`disease. Gastroenterology 1996;111:439-44.
`27. Falagas M, Snydman D, Griffith J, et al. Group at BCfLTCS. Effect of
`cytomegalovirus infection status on first-ye.rr mortality rates among
`orthotopic liver transplant recipients. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126:275-9.
`28. Schmidt G, Horak D, Niland J, et al. A randomized controlled trial of
`prophylactic ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus pulmonary infection in
`recipients of bone marrow transplants. N Eng! J Med 1991;324:1005-
`11.
`29. Merigan T, Renlund D, Keay SEA. A controlled trial of ganciclovir to
`prevent cytomegalovirus disease after heart transplantation. N Eng!
`J Med 1992;326:1182-6.
`30. Winston D, Wirin D, Shaked A, et al. Randomized comparison of
`ganciclovir and high-dose acyclovir for long-term cytomegalovirus
`prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients. Lancet 1995;345:69-74.
`31. Spector S, McKinley G, Lalezari J, et al. Oral ganciclovir for the
`prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in persons with AIDS. N Eng!
`J Med 1995;334:1491-7.
`32. Masur H. Prevention. In: Masur H, ed. Advances in the management
`of AIDS-related cytomegalovirus retinitis. Am Intern Med 1996;125:
`126-36.
`33. Rubin R. Preemptive therapy in immunocompromised hosts. N Eng!
`J Med 1991;324:1057-9.
`34. Imbert-Marcille B, Cantarovich D, Ferre-Aubineau V, et al. Usefulness
`of DNA viral load quantification for cytomegalovirus disease moni(cid:173)
`toring in renal and pancreas/renal transplant recipients. Transplantation
`1997;63: 1476-81.
`35. Brennan D, Garlock K, Lippmann B, et al. Control of cytomegalovi(cid:173)
`rus-associated morbidity in renal transplant patients using intensive
`monitoring and either preemptive or deferred therapy. J Am Soc
`Nephrol 1997;8:118-25.
`36. Abecassis M, Koffron A, Kaplan B, et al. The role of PCR in the
`diagnosis and management of CMV in solid organ recipients: What is
`the predictive value for the development of disease and should PCR be
`used to guide antiviral therapy? Transplantation 1997;63.
`37. Prentice H, Kho P. Clinical strategies for the management of cyto(cid:173)
`megalovirus infection and disease in allogeneic bone marrow trans(cid:173)
`plant. Bone marrow Transplantation 1997;19:135-42.
`38. Dodt K, Jacobsen P, Hofmann B, et al. Development of cytomegalo(cid:173)
`virus (CMV) disease may be predicted in IllY-infected patients by
`CMV polymerase chain reaction and the antig enemia test. AIDS 1997;
`11:F21-8.
`39. Shinkai M, Bozzette S, Powderly W, et al. Utility of urine and leuko(cid:173)
`cyte cultures and plasma DNA polymerase chain reaction for identi(cid:173)
`fication of AIDS patients at risk for developing human cytomegalo(cid:173)
`virus disease. J Infect Dis 1997;175:302-9.
`40. Rasmussen L, Morris S, Zipeto D, et al. Quantit

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket