throbber
001_170_Suppl_II_05_JON 31.05.2005 14:55 Uhr Seite 1
`
`J Neurol (2005) 252 [Suppl 2]: II/1–II/51
`DOI 10.1007/s00415-005-2001-7
`
`Fifteenth Meeting of the
`European Neurological Society
`18–22 June 2005, Vienna, Austria
`Symposia and Free Communications
`
`The abstracts have been reviewed by:
`Z. Argov, V. Dietz, M. Donaghy, C. Elger, F. Fazekas, J. M. Ferro,
`C. Krarup, M.-H. Marion, I. Milonas, G. Moonen, E. Nobile-Orazio,
`V. Planté-Bordeneuve, G. Said, R. Soffietti, A. Steck, E. Tolosa,
`J. Valls-Solé, Y. von Cramon
`
`SUN - IPR2017-01929, Ex. 1007, p. 1 of 3
`
`

`

`001_170_Suppl_II_05_JON 31.05.2005 14:55 Uhr Seite 2
`
`II/2
`
`Contents
`
`Presidential symposium
`Advances in multiple sclerosis
`
`II/3
`
`Symposia
`Imaging the human mind II/4
`Cell and gene therapy
`II/5
`Controversies in neurology
`
`II/6
`
`FREE COMMUNICATIONS
`Oral Sessions
`
`Session 1: Cerebrovascular disorders 1
`Session 2: Cerebrovascular disorders 2
`Session 3: Clinical neurophysiology 1
`Session 4: Clinical neurophysiology 2
`Session 5: Epilepsy 1
`II/14
`Session 6: Epilepsy 2
`II/15
`II/17
`Session 7: Motor neuron disease 1
`II/18
`Session 8: Motor neuron disease 2
`Session 9: Multiple sclerosis 1
`II/20
`Session 10: Multiple sclerosis 2
`II/22
`Session 11: Muscle and neuromuscular junction disorders
`Session 12: Muscle disorders 2
`II/25
`II/26
`Session 13: Cerebrovascular disease 3
`II/28
`Session 14: Cerebrovascular disease 4
`II/29
`Session 15: Extrapyramidal disorders 1
`II/31
`Session 16: Extrapyramidal disorders 2
`Session 17: Neuro-ophthalmology and vestibular disturbance
`Session 18: Infections of the nervous system II/34
`Session 19: Neurogenetics 1
`II/35
`Session 20: Neurogenetics 2
`II/37
`Session 21: Multiple sclerosis 3
`II/38
`Session 22: Multiple sclerosis 4
`II/40
`Session 23: Higher function disorders 1
`Session 24: Higher function disorders 2
`Session 25: Multiple sclerosis 5
`II/45
`Session 26: Peripheral neuropathy
`II/47
`Session 27: Neuro-oncology
`II/49
`
`II/23
`
`II/32
`
`II/8
`II/10
`II/11
`II/12
`
`II/41
`II/43
`
`II/58
`
`II/55
`Epilepsy
`General neurology
`Genetics
`II/59
`Headache
`II/60
`II/62
`Multiple sclerosis
`Neurobiology
`II/66
`Neuro-oncology
`II/68
`Neuro-ophthalmology
`Rehabilitation II/72
`
`II/70
`
`II/74
`
`Poster session 2
`Cerebrovascular disorders
`Epilepsy
`II/79
`General neurology
`Genetics
`II/85
`Infection II/86
`II/88
`Motor neuron disease
`Multiple sclerosis
`II/90
`
`II/82
`
`Poster session 3
`Cerebrovascular disorders
`Extrapyramidal disorders
`General neurology
`II/101
`Headache
`II/103
`Higher function disorders
`Multiple sclerosis
`II/108
`Neurophysiology
`II/113
`
`II/95
`II/98
`
`II/105
`
`Poster session 4
`Cerebrovascular disorders
`Extrapyramidal disorders
`General neurology
`II/122
`Higher function disorders
`Multiple sclerosis
`II/126
`Muscle disorders
`II/132
`Peripheral neuropathy
`II/134
`
`II/115
`II/119
`
`II/125
`
`II/137
`
`II/144
`
`Poster session 5
`Cerebrovascular disorders
`Neurophysiology
`II/142
`Extrapyramidal disorders
`Multiple sclerosis
`II/146
`Muscle disorders
`II/149
`Pain II/153
`Peripheral neuropathy
`Sleep disorders
`II/158
`
`II/154
`
`Abstracts for Poster Sessions
`
`Poster Session 1
`II/51
`Child neurology
`Cerebrovascular disorders
`
`II/53
`
`Author index
`
`II/160
`
`SUN - IPR2017-01929, Ex. 1007, p. 2 of 3
`
`

`

`001_170_Suppl_II_05_JON 31.05.2005 14:55 Uhr Seite 41
`
`O139
`Long-term follow-up of patients treated with glatiramer acetate: a multi-
`centre, multi-national extension of the European/Canadian double-blind,
`placebo-controlled, MRI-monitored trial
`M. Rovaris, G. Comi, M. Rocca, D. Ladkani, P. Valsasina, E. Pieri, G. Shifroni,
`J. S. Wolinsky, M. Filippi
`Ospedale San Raffaele, TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries, TEVA Italia, The
`University of Texas (Milan, I; Petah Tiqva, IL; Netanya, IL; Houston, USA)
`
`Objective: To investigate the long-term evolution of clinical and MRI find-
`ings in patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS) who
`participated in the glatiramer acetate (GA) 9003 trial, in order to explore
`the correlates of long-term GA treatment.
`Background: GA is effective in reducing clinical and MRI activity in
`RRMS. Serial MRI data on a long-term basis were never obtained for large
`samples of GA-treated patients.
`Design/Methods: The 9003 study consisted of two consecutive phases,
`each lasting nine months. The first treatment phase was randomized, dou-
`ble-blind and placebo-controlled. The second was an active treatment
`phase for all patients. Treatment consisted of daily administration of 20 mg
`GA subcutaneously. All patients underwent brain MRI at screening (to be
`included, they had to have one or more enhancing lesions), baseline, every
`month during the double-blind phase and every three months during the
`open-label phase. Clinical assessment included neurological visits with
`Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score rating. For the long-term
`follow-up (LTFU), dual echo, pre- and post-gadolinium T1-weighted brain
`MRI scans were obtained with the same acquisition scheme as for the orig-
`inal trial and a neurological assessment was performed. Total T2-hyperin-
`tense and T1-hypointense lesion volumes, as well as normalized brain vol-
`umes (NBV) and percentage BV changes (PBVC), were measured.
`Results: One hundred and forty-two of 224 patients who completed the
`9003 study (63.4 %) underwent the LTFU after a mean period of 5.8 years.
`Seventy-three of them had been treated with GA since the study initiation.
`At 9003 baseline, there were no significant differences between patients
`who subsequently came at LTFU and those who did not.Among the former
`ones, MRI measures of disease burden and activity, as well as brain volume
`changes, at LTFU did not significantly differ between patients originally
`assigned to placebo and those who were always treated with GA. The pro-
`portion of patients who did not reach relevant locomotor disability (EDSS
`≥6.0) at LTFU was significantly greater in patients treated with GA during
`the first nine months of the 9003 trial (p = 0.03). PBVC between baseline
`and LTFU was significantly correlated with T2 lesion volume at study en-
`try.
`
`Conclusions: This study indicates that the earlier initiation of GA treat-
`ment in patients with active RRMS might have a favorable impact on the
`long-term disease evolution.
`
`O140
`A phase II randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evalu-
`ate the preliminary efficacy and safety of abatacept, a selective co-stimu-
`lation modulator, in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
`C. Fieschi, O. Andersen, C. Markowitz, J. Simon, D. Hough, T. McCann, D.
`Hagerty, C. Gruber
`University of Roma ‘La Sapienza’, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Hospi-
`tal of University of Pennsylvania, University of Colorado Health Sciences
`Center, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (Rome, I; Göteborg, S; Philadel-
`phia, Denver, Princeton, USA; Braine-L’Alleud, B)
`
`Background: Abatacept selectively modulates the co-stimulatory signal re-
`quired for the full activation of T-cells expressing CD28. Abatacept has
`demonstrated efficacy in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, a
`surrogate animal model thought to be predictive of human multiple scle-
`rosis (MS).
`Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of abatacept in patients
`with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS).
`Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled co-
`hort study in RRMS male and female patients aged 18–58 years. Patients
`had definite MS, an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ≤6 (inclu-
`sive), at least 1 relapse in the preceding 2 years (clinically stable for 2
`months prior to treatment) and at least 1 gadolinium T1 (GdT1) enhanc-
`ing lesion on magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were randomized into
`1 of 3 cohorts receiving: abatacept 2 mg/kg, abatacept 10 mg/kg or placebo
`by infusion on Days 1, 15, 29, and then every 4 weeks until Day 197.
`Results: The study terminated early due to an increase in patients with
`≥5 new GdT1 lesions in the abatacept 2 mg/kg group. The cohort design re-
`sulted in excess patients in the abatacept 2 mg/kg group with poor baseline
`prognostic factors; 80 % of patients with > 10 GdT1 enhancing lesions were
`randomized to abatacept 2 mg/kg. A total of 127 of a planned 219 patients
`
`II/41
`
`were randomized and received ≥1 infusion of study medication. Com-
`pared with abatacept 2 mg/kg and placebo, abatacept 10 mg/kg-treated pa-
`tients had fewer new (1.5 vs. 8.0 vs. 5.5) and total GdT1 enhancing lesions
`(3.0 vs. 13.0 vs. 8.5), fewer protocol defined exacerbations (20.6 vs. 56.6 vs.
`30 %), a lower mean annualized relapse rate (0.38 vs. 1.49 vs. 0.73), a greater
`proportion free from enhancing activity (12 (36, 4 %) vs. 7 (13, 2 %) vs. 6
`(15 %)) and with improved EDSS (44.1 vs. 17.0 vs. 25 %).
`Conclusions: The cohort design contributed to clinically important
`treatment group imbalances at baseline that precluded conclusive assess-
`ment of the safety and efficacy profile of abatacept in RRMS. However,
`while the abatacept 2 mg/kg group experienced more MS-related symp-
`toms and relapses, data from the abatacept 10 mg/kg cohort were sugges-
`tive of reduced disease activity.
`
`O141
`FTY720 in relapsing MS: results of a double-blind placebo-controlled trial
`with a novel oral immunomodulator
`L. Kappos, E. W. Radü, J. Antel, G. Comi, X. Montalban, P. O’Connor, O.
`Bettoni-Ristic, T. Haas, R. Preiss, A. Korn
`on behalf of the FTY720D2201 Study Group
`
`FTY720 is an oral immunomodulator (sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor
`(S1P) modulator) that reversibly sequesters tissue damaging T and B cells
`away from blood and the central nervous system to peripheral lymph
`nodes. FTY720 has demonstrated both preventive and therapeutic efficacy
`in several animal models of MS.
`Methods: We report the clinical and MRI results of an international,
`multicenter, double-blind study to evaluate efficacy, safety and tolerability
`of two doses of FTY720 and placebo (PL). 281 patients with active relaps-
`ing MS were randomized to receive PL (n = 93), 1.25 mg (n = 94) or 5.0 mg
`FTY720 (n = 94) q. d. for 6 months. Patients had monthly cranial MRI scans
`and 3-monthly neurological assessments by a neurologist otherwise not
`involved in their care.
`Results: Clinical and MRI baseline characteristics were balanced
`amongst groups. The primary outcome, mean (median) total number of
`Gadolinium(Gd)-enhancing lesions in monthly post baseline MRI scans
`was 14.8 (5.0), 8.4 (1.0) and 5.7 (3.0) for PL, FTY 1.25 and 5.0 mg groups
`(p < 0.001 1.25 vs. PL, p = 0.006 5.0 vs. PL). Similar, clearly significant effects
`favoring both FTY720 groups vs. PL were found for Gd-enhancing lesion
`volume, new T2 lesions and change in T2 lesion volume (only 5 mg qd sign.
`better than PL). The proportion of relapse-free patients (70.0, 86.0 and
`86 %; p = 0.007 1.25 mg vs. PL, p = 0.008 5 mg vs. PL), annualized relapse
`rate (0.77, 0.35 and 0.36) and time to first relapse were significantly better
`in both FTY720 groups vs. PL. There was no compelling dose-related dif-
`ference in efficacy on MRI or clinical endpoints. Treatment was generally
`well tolerated with 255 (91 %) of patients completing study and 249 (89 %)
`electing to continue into the extension phase where PL patients were
`rerandomized to one of the active drug dose groups. Adverse events were
`more common in the 5 mg group, with the most frequently reported
`(> 15 % patients) being mild headaches and nasopharyngitis.
`Conclusion: This proof of concept study demonstrated efficacy of
`FTY720 on both MRI and relapse-related endpoints. Both the efficacy and
`safety evaluations strongly suggest that FTY720 has the potential to be an
`efficacious disease modifying treatment for relapsing forms of MS with the
`additional benefit of once daily oral administration.
`Study supported by Novartis Pharma AG Basel.
`
`Session 23
`
`Higher function disorders 1
`
`O142
`Interaction between CYP19-aromatase and butyrylcholinesterase genes
`increases Alzheimer’s disease risk
`J. Infante, J. Riancho, I. Mateo, E. Rodríguez, J. Berciano, O. Combarros
`University Hospital Marques Valdecilla (Santander, E)
`
`Background: Biological evidence suggests that the enzymes aromatase
`(CYP19) and butyrylcholinesterase (BCHE) play a role in disrupting the
`cholinergic neurotransmission observed in Alzheimer’s disease (AD).
`CYP19 is a critical enzyme in the peripheral synthesis of estrogens, which
`
`SUN - IPR2017-01929, Ex. 1007, p. 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket