throbber

`
`ELSEVTER
`
`Animal Reproduction Science 51 (1998) 81796
`
`ANIMAL
`REPRODUCTION
`SCIENCE
`
`Oestrogenic effects of ICI 182,780, a putative
`anti-oestrogen, on the secretion of oxytocin and
`prostaglandin F20, during oestrous cycle in the
`intact ewe
`
`H.Y. Al-Matubsi a’*, R.J. Fairclough b, G. Jenkin c
`a Centre for Bioproouu ng and Food Technology, Victoria University of Technology, Werribee Campus
`PO Box 14428 MCMC, Melbourne VIC 8001, Australia
`b Department of Biomedical Sciences Victoria University of Technology, 3. Albans Campus PO Box 14428
`MCMC, Melbourne VIC 8001, Australia
`C Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
`Accepted 2 February 1998
`
`Abstract
`
`The effect of ICI 182,780, oestrogen antagonist, on the concentrations of oxytocin and uterine
`PGFZa was investigated in intact Border Leicester Merino cross ewes during the late oestrous
`cycle. Twelve cyclic ewes (n = 6 per group) were randomly assigned to receive, at 6 h intervals,
`intra—muscular injection of either peanut oil or ICI 182,780 (1.5 mg kg’1 day’ 1) in oil for 2 days,
`starting at 1900 h on day 13 until 1300 h on day 15 post-oestrus. Hourly blood samples were
`collected via a jugular catheter from 0800 h on day 14 for 37 h and then daily over days 16, 17
`and 18 post-oestrus. Peripheral plasma concentrations of oxytocin, the metabolite of prostaglandin
`FM, 15-keto-13,14—dihydro-prostaglandin FM, (PGFM) and progesterone were measured by
`radioimmunoassay. All ewes treated with ICI 182,780 exhibited functional luteal regression as
`indicated by a marked reduction in plasma progesterone concentrations to less than 1000 pg /ml
`over the period of 18—36 h during sampling period on days 14 and 15 of the oestrous cycle. In
`five of six vehicle-treated ewes, progesterone concentrations declined between day 16 and day 18
`post-oestrus. In the remaining control ewe, progesterone concentrations reach less than 1000
`pg /ml within 36 h of the commencement of the sampling period. During the frequent sampling
`period, the number of oxytocin pulses in the ICI 182,780 treated ewes was significantly higher
`compared to control ewes (2.7 i0.3 vs. 0.8 i0.3). The mean amplitude of oxytocin pulses
`observed was also greater (70.4 i 19.5 pg /ml) in ewes treated with ICI 182,780, but was not
`
`*
`
`author. Tel.:
`Corresponding
`$94103l2@cougar.vut.edu.au
`
`+61
`
`3
`
`9216
`
`8108;
`
`fax:
`
`+61
`
`3
`
`9216
`
`8135;
`
`e-mail:
`
`0378—4320/98/$l9.00 © 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
`PII S0378-4320(98)00068-2
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2165 p. 1
`InnoPharma Licensing LLC v. AstraZeneca AB
`IPR2017-00900
`
`Fresenius-Kabi USA LLC v. AstraZeneca AB
`
`IPR2017-01913
`
`

`

`82
`
`H.Y. AI-Matubsi et al ./Animal Reproduction Science 51 (1998) 81—96
`
`significantly different from control ewes (33.5 i 12.9 pg /ml). Oxytocin pulses may however have
`occurred following the initial two ICI 182,780 injections but before commencing blood sampling.
`The oxytocin pulses were detected at a mean of 3.2 i 0.2 h following each injection with ICI
`182,780 during blood sampling. In the ICI 182,780-treated ewes, the pulsatile pattern of plasma
`PGFM in jugular blood samples over the 37 h sampling period on days 14 and 15 post-oestrus had
`a higher amplitude (512.9 i 158.9 vs. 121.7 i 78.7 pg/ml) and pulse area (618.1 i 183.3 vs.
`151.5 i 102.9 (pg/ml)7) compared to the vehicle-treated ewes (P < 0.05) respectively. The
`average number of PGFM pulses observed per ewe was 3.0 i 0.7 in the ICI 182,780-treated group
`and was significantly (P < 0.02) higher than the number of pulses (0.5 i 0.3) observed in ewes
`treated with vehicle alone. The PGFM pulses were detected at 4.2 i 0.6 h following each injection
`with ICI 182,780 during blood sampling. The percentage of PGFM pulses that occurred coinci-
`dently with a significant elevation of oxytocin concentrations was 44.4% in ICI 182,780-treated
`compared to 66.6% in control ewes. We conclude that administration of oestrogen antagonist ICI
`182,780 accelerated development of the luteolytic mechanism by enhancing pulsatile secretion of
`oxytocin and PGFM which suggests that ICI 182,780 acts as an agonist for oxytocin and
`prostaglandin FM release in intact ewes when administered at 1.5 mg /kg /day over Day 13 to 15
`post-oestrus. © 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
`
`Keywords Oestrogen antagonist; Oxytocin; Prostaglandin; Sheep endocrinology
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Considerable evidence now exists indicating that oxytocin can induce endometrial
`prostaglandin F20, (PG)F2a secretion from the uterus (Shanna and Fitzpatrick, 1974;
`Roberts et 31., 1976; Flint et 31., 1990) and that PGFM can stimulate lute31 oxytocin
`secretion (Flint and Sheldrick, 1982; Watkins and Moore, 1987; Lamsa et 31., 1989).
`Pulsatile release of PGFM by the endometrium may be more effective than continuous
`secretion since Schramm et 31. (1983) have demonstrated that exogenous administration
`of PGFM is more potent as 3 luteolysin when administered in a series of pulses rather
`than as a continuous infusion. During luteolysis, oxytocin pulses, or its associated
`neurophysin, occur simultaneously with pulses of PGFM (Fairclough et al., 1980; Webb
`et 31., 1981; Flint and Sheldrick, 1983; Moore et al., 1986; Hooper et 31., 1986).
`Oestrogen also appears to play a role in regulation of uterine function since administra-
`tion of relatively high doses of oestradiol to ewes during the mid-luteal phase (Ford et
`31., 1975; Hixon and Flint, 1987) or to ewes and cows on day 12 (Spencer et 31., 1995;
`Brunner et 31., 1969) resulted in premature lute31 regression and caused a premature
`decline in lute31 weight (Hawk and Bolt, 1970). Oestrogen also appears to affect the
`timing, magnitude and pattern of PGFM response to oxytocin (McCracken, 1980; Zhang
`et 31., 1991; Beard and Lamming, 1994). The mechanism by which oestrogen interacts
`with oxytocin and PGFM at luteolysis is not clear, although time course studies indicate
`that it takes several hours to act.
`
`In a preliminary report, Fairclough et 31. (1988) administered oestradiol 17-13 to
`intact ewes on days 12, 13 and 14 of the oestrous cycle and found an associated increase
`in plasma oxytocin—neurophysin and/ or PGFM with a maximum concentration occur-
`ring at 4—8 h after oestrogen treatment. Furthermore, Mann and Lamming (1995) have
`reported that in ovariectomized cows there was a reduction in the strength of the
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2165 p. 2
`
`

`

`H.Y. AI-Matubsi et al ./Animal Reproduction Science 51 (1998) 81—96
`
`83
`
`luteolytic signal over the later stages of the luteal phase following removal of an
`oestradiol implant on day 11 of the simulated cycle. In heifers, Jacobs et al. (1988) have
`also shown that the increase in secretion of endogenous PGFM that follows induction of
`luteolysis with the PGFM agonist cloprostenol is suppressed by intravenous injections of
`tamoxifen, an oestrogen antagonist. These data indicated that the PGFM secretion at the
`time of luteolysis is dependent on oestradiol.
`Oestradiol-17B is also involved in regulation of the corpus luteum and influences
`luteolysis.
`In ewes, oestrogen may act directly on the corpus luteum through an
`intra-ovarian mechanism because injection of oestrogen directly into the corpus luteum
`at day 10 post-oestrus resulted in regression of the injected corpus luteum but had little
`effect on the contralateral corpus luteum (Cook et al., 1974). Furthermore, removal of
`the main source of oestrogen by destmction of ovarian follicles extended the cycle
`length in the ewe (Karsch et al., 1970; Ginther, 1971; Zhang et al., 1991) and cattle
`(Fogwell et al., 1985; Villa-Godoy et al., 1985). The mechamsm by which oestrogen
`acts to stimulate oxytocin and uterine PGFM is uncertain.
`ICI 182,780 is thought to be a pure steroidal oestrogen antagomst which blocks
`oestrogen action by competing with endogenous oestrogen for oestrogen receptors
`present in the nuclei of oestrogen responsive tissue (Baker and Jaffe, 1996). ICI 182,7 80
`has been found to be devoid of agonist activity in vivo in the immature and mature rat
`(Wakeling et al., 1991) and blocked the production of the 250 kDa protein which was
`associated with the stimulatory action of oestrogen in ovariectomized rat (Yu et al.,
`1996). Recently, Dibbs et al. (1995) have shown that administration of ICI 182,780 to
`ovariectomized rat subcutaneously (1.5 mg/kg daily for 3 days) blocked the effect of
`oestrogen on the uterine oxytocin receptor within 24 h after the final dose. However,
`Wakeling (1993) reported that ICI 182,780 showed no effect on bone density analysis in
`adult female rats, whereas ovariectomy significantly reduced bone density. In guinea-pigs
`the admimstration of 4 mg of the same putative oestrogen antagomst (equivalent to
`4.7—6.15 mg/kg), once a day on days 11—14 of the cycle, significantly reduced the
`output of PGFM from superfused uterine horn in vitro on day 15 post-oestms (Poyser,
`1993). In this case, the ICI 182,780 compound may be acting by increasing receptor
`turnover and reducing the cellular content of oestrogen receptors (Parker, 1993).
`Administration of ICI 182,780 (12 mg) daily for 7 days in women with normal
`menstrual cycles, decrease the incidence of the mid-cycle LH surge and had an
`anti-proliferative effect on endometrial thickness as measured by ultrasound (Thomas et
`al., 1994).
`This study was undertaken to investigate the inhibitory action of the purported
`oestrogen receptor antagomst (ICI 182,7 80) on oxytocin, uterine PGFM production, and
`on luteal function in intact ewes.
`
`2. Materials and methods
`
`2.1. Animals
`
`All protocols were approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committees of
`Victoria University of Technology (AEEC 95/025) and Monash University.
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2165 p. 3
`
`

`

`84
`
`H.Y. AI-Matubsi et al ./Animal Reproduction Science 51 (1998) 81—96
`
`Twelve 3-year-old Border Leicester Merino cross ewes, weighing 42—55 kg, were
`used in this study during the breeding season. The oestrous cycles of the ewes were
`synchronised by the insertion of an intra-vaginal controlled internal drug release (CIDR)
`device impregnated with 300 mg progesterone (EAZI-breed CIDR G, Riverina Artificial
`Breeders, Albury, Australia) for 14 days and by an intra-muscular injection of Semm
`Gonadotrophin (400 IU) to each ewe following removal of the CIDR. Ewes were housed
`in an open barn together with a crayon-bearing vasectomized rams. Ewes were checked
`twice daily for behavioural oestms. The day that the ewe display oestrus behaviour was
`designated to be Day 0. One week before experimentation, the ewes were maintained in
`individual pens with access to water and fed luceme chaff, oats and ewe and lamb
`pellets ad libitum.
`On day 13 post-oestrus, cannulation was performed under local anaesthesia (10%
`Lignocaine Hydrochloride Spray: Xylocaine). The jugular vein of each ewe was
`cannulated by insertion of an intracath (Intervenous Catheter Placement Unit; 16 GA;
`Desert Medical, Becton Dickinson, Sandy, UT). The exteriorised end of the catheter was
`connected to a 3 way stopcock. The catheters were secured to the ewes by placing
`Setonet (Elastic net bandage, size 5; Seton Products, England) around the neck over the
`cannula. Cannulae were then maintained for the duration of the experiment by filling
`with heparimsed saline (50 IU/ n11) and used for the collection of blood samples.
`
`2.2. Experimental protocol
`
`Ewes were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 6 per group). One group was
`treated with intra-muscular injections of 1.5 mg kg’1 day’1 ICI 182,780 [7a-[9-
`(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoro-pentylsulphinyl)nonyl]estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17B-diol]
`(a gift
`from ICI Pharmaceuticals, Australia) in peanut oil while the other group was treated
`with peanut oil alone (controls), at 6 h intervals at 1900 h on day 13 up until 1300 h on
`day 15 post-oestrus. The ICI 182,780 (8.5 mg in 1 ml) was dissolved in absolute ethanol
`to a concentration of 5% (v/v) of the final volume. The exact volume of peanut oil was
`then added and the ethanol was evaporated using mild heat (40°C) and under constant
`stirring with a magnetic stirrer.
`
`2.3. Blood sanpling
`
`Blood samples (5 ml) were collected over days 14 and 15 of the oestrous cycle at
`hourly intervals starting at 0800 h (12 h after commencement of injection of antagomst)
`for 37 h and then daily over days 16, 17 and 18 post-oestrus. Blood samples were
`
`Fig. 1. Effect of ICI 182,780 on oxytocin (. ), PGFM (O), and progesterone (A) concentrations in peripheral
`plasma in intact ewes late in the oestrous cycle (n= 6; ewe 212, 217, 222, 213, 207, 210). ICI 182,780 was
`injected at 1900 h on Day 13 post-oestrus. ICI 182,780 (1.5 mg kg’1 day’ 1) was administered intra-muscu—
`larly every 6 h up until 1300 h on Day 15 post-oestrus. (1) represent time of injection. Zero time (0) h
`represents 0800 h on Day 14. Blood samples were collected hourly starting at (0) h time up to 37 h during
`Days 14 and 15 post-oestrus and, thereafter, once a day on Days 16, 17 and 18 post-oestrus. Statistically
`significant pulses in the oxytocin and PGFM concentrations are identified by (*) and (T), respectively;
`inverted triangles (V) identify synchronous pulses of both compounds.
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2165 p. 4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`10000
`9000 —
`9 3000 —
`7
`—
`E
`c
`g
`000 g 200 _
`V 6000 — Q
`g
`v
`o
`5000
`c 150
`a
`'6
`~—
`4000 — 0
`<n
`g
`on
`3000 —
`:0
`><
`o
`O
`"
`'3'
`
`100 .0
`
`50 —
`
`2000 —
`1000 —
`
`O
`
`0
`
`i
`
`l
`
`|
`
`|
`
`I
`
`10000 —
`9000 _
`8000 _
`
`7000 _
`6000 —
`
`5000 —
`4000 —
`
`3000 —
`2000 —
`1000 —
`
`300 —
`
`25° —
`
`200 _
`
`150 —
`100
`
`“l
`50 _
`
`0
`
`0
`
`l
`
`l
`
`I
`
`T__|
`
`|
`
`H.Y. AI-Matubsi et aI./Anir‘ra| Reproduction Science 51 (1998) 81—96
`
`85
`
`collected into polypropylene tubes containing aspirin and ethylenediaminetetraacetic
`acid (EDTA), 0.7 and 0.5 mg/ n11 blood respectively. The catheter was refilled with
`heparinised saline (50 IU/ ml) during frequent blood sampling. Blood samples were then
`
`10000 —
`9000 —
`
`5000 _
`
`7000 —
`6000 —
`
`5000 —
`4000 -
`3000 —
`2000 —
`1000 —
`0 _
`
`i
`4‘ V V
`
`i
`
`l
`W T
`
`300 —
`
`t
`
`i
`
`i
`
`i
`
`2
`
`’1
`
`250
`
`2o0 _
`
`150 —
`
`10° —
`50 _
`
`o _|
`
`|
`
`|
`
`I
`
`I
`
`Ah
`l
`
`I ‘ ' I e I
`
`I
`
`213— 2200
`— 2000
`_
`1800
`— 1
`« 1400
`60°
`— 1200
`
`1000
`800
`600
`_ 400
`_ 20°
`al
`0
`
`
`300
`
`250 -
`
`
`
`
`c
`E
`E)
`Q
`V
`2
`LI-
`(D
`D.
`
`210— 2200
`_ 2000
`— 1800
`
`— 1400
`— 1600
`— 1200
`
`1000
`_ 800
`
`v
`
`2
`
`T
`
`V v
`
`T
`
`v v
`
`I Fig 0
`
`_ 600
`,— 400
`- 200
`
`|
`
`13
`
`I
`
`14
`
`|
`
`15
`
`I16 I 17 |18I
`
`Days post-oestrus
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2165 p. 5
`
`

`

`86
`
`H.Y. AI-Matubsi et al ./Animal Reproduction Science 51 (1998) 81—96
`
`(b) 10000 —
`9000 —
`
`300
`
`i
`
`250
`
`200
`
`150
`
`8000 —
`
`7000 —
`6000 —
`5000 —
`4000 —
`
`
`
`100
`3000 _i
`2000 —
`50
`1000 —
`
`0
`I
`|
`O
`
`o
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`L 2200
`— 2000
`_
`_
`
`1800
`1600 9
`_
`E
`1400 \
`0.,
`— 1200
`o.
`V
`— 1000 §
`L'-
`— 800
`(5
`n.
`— 600
`
`v 400
`— 200
`
`0
`
`222— 2200
`— 2000
`
`— 180°
`— 1600
`
`— 1400
`— 1200
`— 1000
`
`800
`_ 600
`— 400
`_ 200
`
`14
`
`l
`
`15
`
`I16 I17 |1s|
`
`Days post-oestrus
`
`Fig. 1 (continued).
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2165 p. 6
`
`10000 —
`9000 —
`
`300 —
`
`A
`
`2 —
`50
`8000 —
`7000 —1 g 200
`\
`U,
`6000 — Q
`v
`5000
`c 150
`'5
`4000 — O
`3'
`3000 — ><
`O
`
`_
`
`100
`
`_
`
`2000 —
`1000 —
`
`50 _
`
`0
`
`0
`
`I
`
`'
`
`'
`
`10000 —
`9000 —
`
`8000 —
`7000 a
`6000 —
`5000 —
`
`4000 —
`3000 —
`2000 —
`1000 —
`o
`
`600 —
`
`250 _
`
`200 “
`150 —
`
`10° _
`50 _
`
`|
`
`CE‘
`B:
`D.
`v
`0)
`c
`o
`B
`+1
`$
`on
`o
`
`L n
`
`.
`
`

`

`H.Y. AI-Matubsi et al ./Animal Reproduction Science 51 (1998) 81—96
`
`87
`
`centrifuged for 1500 X g for 10 min at 4°C and plasma was separated and stored at
`— 20°C until assayed for oxytocin, PGFM and progesterone by radioimmunoassay.
`
`2.4. Hormone assays
`
`2.4.1. PGFM assay
`Plasma PGFM concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) as previ-
`ously described (Burgess et al., 1990). The antiserum was raised in sheep against PGFM
`conjugated to porcine gelatine and was kindly supplied by Dr. R.I. Cox (CSIRO,
`Blacktown, NSW). At a final dilution of 1:50 000, the cross-reactivity of this antisera
`with other related compounds including 13,l4-dihydro-l5-keto-PGF2a, 6,15-diketo-
`13,14,dihydro-PGF1a, 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2, 15-keto-PGF2a, lS-keto-PGE2 and
`PGA2 was 100, 4.6, 1.9, 0.9, 0.3, and 0.02%, respectively, and was <0.01% with
`PGFM, PGEZ, 6-keto-PGF1a, 6-keto-PGE1, PGEI, PGD2, PGB2 and thromboxane B2.
`The sensitivity of the assay was 39 pg/ml. The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of
`variation were 7.6% and 9.4%, respectively.
`
`2.4.2. Progesterone assay
`For progesterone, 200 ,ul of jugular venous plasma was extracted with 2 ml n-hexane
`(Crown Scientific, Vic., Australia) as described by Rice et al. (1986). The antisemm,
`raised in sheep against progesterone-1 1 a-Bovine semm albumin (B SA), was generously
`provided by Dr J. Malecki (Regional Veterinary Institute, Department of Agricultural
`and Rural Affairs, Baimsdale, Victoria). At a final dilution of 1:9000, the cross-reaction
`of the antiserum with progesterone, 11a-hydroxy-progesterone, 5a-pregnane-3 a-ol-20-
`one, 5 B-pregnane-3 a-ol-20-one and corticosterone was 100, 43.8, 15.9, 10.0, and
`1.05%, respectively. The cross reactivity was < 1.0% with 11-deoxycortisol, 5a-preg-
`nane-3 a,17a-diol-20-one,
`5 B-pregnane-3 a,17a,
`20 a-triol-20-one,
`5 B-pregnane-
`3a,17a,20 a-triol and 5a-pregnane-3B-ol-2-one, 0.7% with 17a-hydroxy-progesterone,
`< 0.4% with dehydroepiandrosterone, 0.3% with 20 a-hydroxy-pregnene-3-one and
`< 0.2% with cortisol. The sensitivity of the assay was 0.3 ng/ n11. All samples were
`measured in one assay and the intra—assay coefficient of variation was 10.9%.
`
`2.4.3. Oxytocin assay
`For oxytocin, 1.2 ml of the standards or jugular plasma samples were mixed with 5
`ml of chilled (— 20°C) absolute ethanol using a modification of the method described in
`the Australian Laboratory Services radioimmunoassay kit. After centrifugation at 1900
`X g for 20 min at 4°C (Sorvall RT7; AMRAD Pharmacia Biotech, Victoria, Australia),
`the supernatant was decanted and evaporated to dryness with filtered air at 37°C using a
`sample concentrator (Medos, Victoria, Australia). Recovery of 125 I-oxytocin from
`plasma samples after extraction was 80.1 i 1.6% (mean i SEM). The residues of these
`solutions were reconstituted in 1.2 ml of 0.05 M Phosphate buffer (pH = 7.4). Standards
`and samples were incubated for at least 30 min at 4°C. To duplicate aliquots of 500 ,ul
`of the extracted standards and samples, 100 ,ul of 125I tracer (10000 cpm, Du Pont
`Victoria, Australia) and then 100 ,ul of antisera diluted in assay buffer were added. The
`assay was incubated overnight at 4°C. Separation of the bound oxytocin was achieved by
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2165 p. 7
`
`

`

`88
`
`H.Y. AI-Matubsi et a|./Anin'a| Reproduction Science 51 (1998) 81—96
`
`the addition of 0.05 ml (1 mg) bovine immunoglobulin semm (Calbiochem, Victoria,
`Australia) and 1 ml of 15% polyethylene glycol 6000 (Crown Scientific, Victoria,
`Australia) at 4°C and then spun at 3300 X 9 rpm for 20 min. The supernatant was
`aspirated and the radioactivity present in the precipitate was quantified using a Packard
`Crystal Gamma Counter (Wallac, Wizard 1470, The Australian Chromatography, Victo-
`ria, Australia). The antisemm to oxytocin (GJ, 137/ 1) was raised in sheep and was
`kindly donated by Dr A.P.F. Flint (Umversity of Nottingham, UK) and was used at a
`final dilution of l:35,500. The cross-reaction of this antiserum with oxytocin, isotocin
`and melanocye-stimulating hormone (MSH) was 100, 0.8, and 0.04%, respectively. The
`cross reactivity was < 0.02% with mesotocin, pressinoic acid, prolactin, argimne
`vasopressin and lysine vasopressin. The sensitivity of the assay was 10 pg/ n11, the intra-
`and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 11.7% and 13.2%, respectively.
`
`2.5. Satistioal analysis
`
`Statistically significant pulses of peripheral oxytocin and PGFM concentrations were
`identified using a Pulsar program (Merriam and Wachter, 1982). Assay noise was
`estimated by regression analysis of the standard deviation for the duplicate determina-
`tions and the mean at each point. Base line was calculated as representing the
`contribution of circadian rhythms or other long term trends but not fluctuations of
`shorter duration. The amplitude of the peripheral oxytocin and PGFM pulses were
`calculated by subtracting base-line values and then rescaled in terms of standard
`deviation umts by dividing the rescaled values by an estimate of assay noise. The
`amplitude of the rescaled pulses were then identified by applying height and duration
`criteria specified by user-defined cut-off points [G( n)] for pulses. These calculations
`were repeated until 2 iterations produced the same values for pulses or until the preset
`limit, 6 iterations, was completed. The quadratic (a), linear (b), and constant (C) terms
`for pulsar were as follows: for oxytocin, a = 0.00, b = 13.15, C = 0.00; and for PGFM,
`a = 0.00, b = 9.44, C: 0.00. The following G( n) values were selected for oxytocin
`pulses: G(1)= 3.8, G(2) = 2.6, G(3) = G(4) = G(5) = 1.2; and for PGFM pulses:
`G(l) = 4.5, G(2) = 2.6, G(3) = 1.9, (4) = 1.5, G(5) = 1.2. The oxytocin and PGFM
`pulses were identified as significant pulses if they were higher than 50 pg/ n11 and 200
`pg/ml, respectively. Coincident episodes in the secretion of oxytocin and PGFM were
`defined as those which showed an increase in the value of the PGFM pulse with a
`defined oxytocin pulse. The area under the significant peripheral oxytocin and PGFM
`pulses were calculated for each ewe and was expressed for both hormones as (pg/ml)7'.
`
`Fig. 2. Effect of vehicle injection on oxytocin (. ), PGFM (O), and progesterone (A) concentrations in
`peripheral plasma in intact ewes late in the oestrous cycle (n = 6; ewe 211, 218, 219, 208, 205, 216). Vehicle
`was injected at 1900 h on Day 13 post-oestrus. Vehicle was administered intra-muscularly every 6 h up until
`1300 h on Day 15 post-oestrus. (1) represent time of injection. Zero time (0) h represents 0800 h on Day 14.
`Blood samples were collected hourly starting at (0) h time up to 37 h during Days 14 and 15 post-oestrus and,
`thereafter, once a day on Days 16, 17 and 18 post-oestrus. Statistically significant pulses in the oxytocin and
`PGFM concentrations are identified by (*) and ( T), respectively; inverted triangles (V) identify synchronous
`pulses of both compounds.
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2165 p. 8
`
`

`

`H.Y. AI-Matubsi et al ./Animal Reproduction Science 51 (1998) 81—96
`
`89
`
`
`300
`
`1
`
`1
`
`i
`
`1
`
`L
`
`*
`
`10000
`9000 —
`8000 ~
`
`7000 _
`6000 —
`5000 —
`
`4000 —
`3000 —
`2000 —
`1000 —
`0
`
`250 —
`
`200 _
`
`150 —
`
`100 _
`
`so —
`
`0
`
`211— 2200
`— 2000
`— 1800
`
`— 1400
`— 1600
`— 1200
`— 1000
`
`_ 000
`
`—
`A
`E
`Ea
`g
`E
`(5
`n.
`
`219— 2200
`~ 2000
`
`— 1800
`
`— 1400
`- 160°
`— 1200
`— 1000
`
`_ 800
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0
`
`
`
`10000 —
`9000 —
`
`300 —
`
`25° _
`
`A
`8000 —
`— —
`_ m
`7000 E 200 _
`6000 g
`5000 E 150

`4000 — 5;
`3000 — X
`O
`2
`0 —
`00
`1000 -
`0
`
`100 _
`
`50 _‘
`
`0
`
`
`
`Progesterone(pg/ml)
`
`
`300
`
`10000
`9000 —
`
`250 —
`
`200 _
`
`150 —
`
`100 _
`
`8000 _4
`
`7000 —
`6000 ——
`5000 —
`
`4000 —
`3000 —
`2000 —
`1000 A
`
`14
`
`I
`
`15
`
`|16|17 I18|
`
`Days post-oestrus
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2165 p. 9
`
`

`

`8000 —
`25° -
`”E
`7000 _ E
`B)
`ca
`\ 20° —
`g
`6000 — Q
`0:
`V
`c:
`5000
`.E
`o
`8
`E
`E 4000— 1;
`c»
`3000 — X
`9
`O
`o_
`
`
`
`
`100—
`
`50 *
`
`— 1500
`— 1000
`— 1400
`— 1200
`
`PGFM(pg/m1)
`
`
`
`90
`
`H.Y. AI-Matubsi et al ./Animal Reproduction Science 51 (1998) 81—96
`
`(D) 10000 —
`9000 —
`
`300 ——
`
`i
`
`I
`
`i
`
`i
`
`1
`
`i
`’
`
`3000 _
`
`7000 —
`6000 -
`5000
`
`4000 —
`3000 —
`2000 —
`1000 —
`
`250 _
`
`200 _
`
`150
`
`10° _
`50 —
`
`0
`
`0
`
`l
`
`'
`
`208— 2200
`— 2000
`
`— 1800
`
`1600
`14001200
`— 1000
`
`800
`
`10000 —
`9000 ——
`
`300 —
`
`T
`
`V
`
`205— 2200
`— 2000
`
`A
`
`150
`
`
`
`
`
`
`— 1000
`_800
`— 600
`2000 -
`_ 400
`1000 —
`— 200
`
`
`0
`I
`I
`I w 0
`
`0
`
`10000 —-
`9000 —
`
`300 —
`
`216— 2200
`— 2000
`
`8000 —
`
`7000 —
`6000 _
`5000 —
`
`4000 —
`3000 —
`2000 —
`1000 —
`
`25° _
`
`200 _
`
`150 —
`
`10° _
`50 _
`
`
`
`

`
`0
`
`I—'—‘—I—'—l
`
`I
`
`
`
`
`— 1800
`
`‘ 1600
`— 1400
`— 1200
`— 1000
`
`800
`_ 600
`— 400
`— 200
`' ‘.~.~.~.~.r.~. egg
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`6
`12
`18
`24
`30
`36
`(hrs)
`
`0
`
`14
`
`I
`
`15
`
`I16 l17l1al
`
`Days post-oestrus
`
`Fig. 2 (continued).
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2165 p. 10
`
`

`

`H.Y. AI-Matubsi et aI./Anirm| Reproduction Science 51 (1998) 81—96
`
`91
`
`The plasma concentrations of oxytocin and PGFM were determined as pg/ n11 while the
`length of that pulse was designated as 7'. Estimated parameters included overall mean
`concentrations, base value, pulse number, pulse amplitude and area under the pulse and
`were carried out using the Pulsar analysis program. The mean i SEM of these parame-
`ters were calculated from all ewes showing significant pulses of either oxytocin and/or
`PGFM and were compared using a Student’s unpaired t-test.
`
`3. Results
`
`Individual patterns of progesterone secretion during the 37 h sampling period on days
`14 and 15; and on days 16, 17 and 18 of oestrus are shown in treated and control ewes
`in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively. Plasma concentrations of progesterone at the beginning of
`the sampling period in ICI 182,780 and vehicle-treated ewes ranged from 2064.7 to
`9046.6 pg/ml, indicating that a functional corpus luteum was present in each ewe at the
`start of experiment.
`The time required for progesterone to reach concentrations of less than 1000 pg/ n11
`in ICI 182,780-treated ewes was significantly (P < 0.005) shorter than that for control
`ewes. All ewes treated with ICI 182,7 80 showed functional luteal regression as indicated
`by progesterone concentrations (< 1000 pg/ n11) in peripheral plasma which declined
`sharply between 18—36 h during the sampling period on days 14 and 15 of the oestrous
`cycle. In five of the six vehicle-treated ewes, progesterone concentrations started to
`decrease on or after day 16 post-oestrus. In one of the control ewes, progesterone
`concentrations reached less than 1000 pg/ n11 at 36 h after the start of the sampling
`period (Fig. 2).
`Mean basal peripheral plasma concentrations of oxytocin in ICI 182,7 80-treated ewes
`were 22.3 i 7.7 pg/ml and not significantly (P > 005) different than those measured in
`animals treated with vehicle alone (23.8 i 7.9 pg/n11) over sampling period. Mean basal
`peripheral plasma concentrations of PGFM were also not significantly (P > 0.05)
`different in ICI 182,780-treated ewes (40.3 i 1.0 pg/ n11) compared with those ewes
`which received vehicle alone (39.4 i 0.4 pg/ ml) over sampling period.
`The effect of intra-muscular injections of ICI 182,780 and vehicle on peripheral
`oxytocin and PGFM concentrations are shown in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively. The results
`of this study clearly demonstrate that administration of ICI 182,7 80 to intact ewes every
`6 h for 2 days significantly (P < 0.01) increased the number of oxytocin pulses per ewe
`(2.7 i 0.3) compared to control ewes (0.8 i 0.3). However, the mean amplitude (70.4 i
`19.5 pg/ml) and the mean area (95.9 i 23.9 pg/ml)7' of oxytocin pulses in ewes
`treated with ICI 182,780 were not significantly different compared to corresponding
`values of 33.5 i 12.9 pg/ml and 79.8 i 34.4 (pg/ml)7, respectively. In ICI 182,780-
`treated ewes, at least two detectable pulses in plasma oxytocin concentration were
`observed per ewe during the sampling period with a maximum concentration occurred at
`the start of the sampling period and then gradually declined during luteolysis. The
`oxytocin pulses were detected at a mean of 3.2 i 0.2 h following each injection with ICI
`182,780. In two of the six control ewes, no detectable pulse of oxytocin was found
`during the sampling period on days 14 and 15 of the oestrous cycle. In the remaining
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2165 p. 11
`
`

`

`92
`
`H.Y. AI-Matubsi et al ./Animal Reproduction Science 51 (1998) 81—96
`
`four ewes, one pulse of oxytocin was observed per ewe over days 14 and 15 post-oestrus
`apart from one ewe (218; Fig. 2) which showed two pulses during the same period. In
`these ewes, the oxytocin pulses were detected at a mean of 5.3 i 0.5 h following each
`injection with vehicle during blood sampling.
`The pulsatile pattern of plasma PGFM in jugular blood samples over the 37 h
`sampling window on days 14 and 15 post-oestms is shown in (Figs.
`1 and 2). The
`average number of PGFM pulses observed per ewe in ICI 182,780-treated group was
`3.0 i 0.7 and significantly (P < 0.02) higher than those observed in ewes treated with
`vehicle alone (0.5 i 0.3). There was a significant differences (P s 0.05) in amplitude
`(512.9 i 158.9 vs. 121.7 i 78.7 pg/ml) and pulse area (618.1 i 183.3 vs. 151.5 i 102.9
`(pg/ml)7-) of the PGFM response measured in ICI 182,780-treated ewes compared to
`that in vehicle-treated ewes, respectively.
`Five of SIX ewes given ICI 182,780 showed at least two detectable pulses in plasma
`PGFM concentration during sampling period. In the remaining ewe (217; Fig. 1) one
`detectable pulse of PGFM was observed in the peripheral plasma. The first pulses of
`PGFM in the ICI 182,780 group were relatively low in magmtude and then increased
`during the sampling period. In these ewes the PGFM pulses were detected at a mean of
`4.2 i 0.6 h following each injection with ICI 182,780 during blood sampling. In four of
`SIX control ewes, no significant pulses in plasma PGFM concentrations were found
`during the sampling period. In one of the other two control ewes, one pulse of plasma
`PGFM was observed (218; Fig. 2) and in the other ewe (205; Fig. 2) there were two
`pulses of PGFM in peripheral plasma. The PGFM pulses were detected in these two
`ewes at a mean of 5.3 i 0.8 h following each injection with vehicle during blood
`sampling. The percentage of PGFM pulses that occurred coincidently with a significant
`elevation of oxytocin concentrations was 44.4% in ICI 182,780-treated, compared to
`66.7% in control ewes, although this difference was not statistically significant (P >
`0.05).
`
`4. Discussion
`
`This study is the first to describe the effect of ICI 182,780 administration on both
`oxytocin and PGFM release in intact ewes. A major finding of this study was that
`premature functional luteolysis occurred in all ewes treated with ICI 182,780 during
`days 14 and 15 of oestrous cycle, as indicated by a fall in progesterone levels; whereas,
`in five out of SIX vehicle-treated ewes, functional luteolysis was not observed until
`between days 16 and 18 post-oestms.
`Previous studies (McCracken, 1980; Hixon and Flint, 1987; Beard and Lamming,
`1994; Al-Matubsi et al., 1998) indicate that oestrogen affects the timing, magmtude and
`pattern of PGFM response to oxytocin. Mann and Lamming (1995) have demonstrated
`previously that a low level of oestradiol admimstered over the second half of the luteal
`phase in the ovariectomized cow model leads to a weak luteolytic signal. However,
`Zhang et al. (1991) found that there was a tendency for the amplitude of PGFM pulses
`to be lower in oestradiol-treated than in control ewes without any effect on the number
`of PGFM pulses.
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2165 p. 12
`
`

`

`H.Y. AI-Matubsi et al ./Animal Reproduction Science 51 (1998) 81—96
`
`93
`
`If oestrogen is associated with the luteal increase in oxytocin and PGFM pulses, the
`finding that the average number of plasma PGFM pulses observed per ICI 182,7 80-treated
`ewe was significantly (P < 0.02) higher than those observed in ewes which received
`vehicle alone between days 14 and 15 post-oestrus, indicates that ICI 182,780 failed to
`antagonise oestradiol secretion in intact ewes. This increase in the number of PGFM
`pulses may have been the cause of premature luteolysis, since it has been shown that the
`frequency at which PGFM is secreted is a factor in determining its effectiveness in
`causing luteolysis (Zarco et al., 1984; Zhang et al., 1991).
`The percentage of PGFM pulses that occurred coincidently with a significant
`elevation of oxytocin concentrations was decreased by the admimstration of ICI
`182,7 80. This view gives further support to the view of Zhang et al. (1991) who reported
`similar effect of oestradiol admimstered to ewes treated with either sham or X-irradiated
`
`ovarian follicles. Thus, these observations indicate that ICI 182,780 may be acting to
`mimic the action of oestrogen in stimulating oxytocin and prostaglandin F201 release in
`intact ewes.
`
`the concentrations of
`Flint and Sheldrick (1983) have previously reported that
`oxytocin following synthetic prostaglandin treatment were higher in ovarian (219— 19230
`pg/ml) than in jugular (23.9—183.1 pg/ n11) plasma and that release was absent
`following ovariectomy. The amplitude of the jugular oxytocin pulses (28.3—281.6
`pg/ml) in the present study is comparable to that observed by Flint and Sheldrick
`(1983) and to those detected by Hooper et al. (1986) in jugular vein (20—220 pg/ n11) in
`which they employed sampling intervals of 1 h for 12 consecutive hours over days
`13—16 of oestrous cycle in cycling ewes. These observations indicate that the concentra-
`tion of oxytocin detected in this study represents luteal rather than posterior secretion.
`If this compound is acting as an oestrogen agonist in the ewe, the data obtained in
`this study of an increase in the frequency of oxytocin pulses from peripheral plasma in
`ewes give

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket