throbber
0013-7227/98/$03.00/0
`Endocrinology
`Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society
`
`Vol. 139, No. 9
`Printed in USA.
`
`Effect of the High-Affinity Estrogen Receptor Ligand ICI
`182,780 on the Rat Tibia"<
`
`JEAN D. SIBONGA, HARALD DOBNIG, RYAN M. HARDEN, AND
`RUSSELL T. TURNER
`
`Department of Orthopedic Research (J.D.S., HD., R.MH, RTT.) and Biochemistry and Molecular
`Biology (R.T. T.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnessota 55905
`
`ABSTRACT
`We examined the specificity of the steroidal antiestrogen ICI
`182,780 (ICI) on bone and reproductive tissues in adult and growing
`female rats. Using a 1.5-mg/kg dose (sc), we evaluated the effects of
`ICI on the bone, body weight, uterine weight, serum cholesterol, and
`serum estradiol in either adult and/or growing rats. ICI increased
`serum estradiol cholesterol in ovary-intact rats, had no effect on
`uterine weight in ovariectomized rats, and resulted in uterine atrophy
`in ovary-intact animals comparable with ovariectomy. In contrast,
`ICI had no effect on body weight. In bone, ICI significantly increased
`the rate of periosteal bone formation in long bones of growing and
`mature female rats. In contrast, ICI had no effect on longitudinal bone
`growth in rapidly growing rats. When ICI was administeredto mature
`rats with or without ovaries, two-factor ANOVA revealed significant
`interaction (P S 0.05) between ovariectomy and ICI treatment for
`cancellous bone area and labeled bone perimeter. ICI increased skel-
`
`
`etal indices ,of bone turnover in the cancellous bone of ovary-intact rats
`but reduced these indices of bone turnover in the cancellous bone of
`ovariectomized rats. The increase in bone turnover was associated
`with a reduction in cancellous bone area in the ovary-intact rats. A
`reduction in bone turnover was similarly associated with an increase
`in bone area in the ICI-treated ovariectomized rats. In summary, ICI
`exhibited complete estrogen antagonism in cortical and cancellous
`bone, partial agonism in cancellous bone, and no activity on tibial
`longitudinal growth rate of growing ovary-intact rats. The effects in
`adult rats were influenced by circulating levels of estradiol. ICI had
`no activity on body weight and complete antagonism on uterine
`weight. These results demonstrate that a ligand with high binding
`affinity to the estrogen receptor(s) can elicit an array of estrogen-
`mediated regulation of bone metabolism. (Endocrinology 139: 3736—
`3742, 1998)
`
`NTlESTROGENS is the term originally applied to com-
`pounds which block the physiological response of
`reproductive tissues to estrogen. It was initially assumed that
`these agents would antagonize estrogen in all target cells.
`Estrogen analogs can act as antiestrogens by competing with
`estrogen for the receptor to produce an inactive ligand-re-
`ceptor complex, but the analog-receptor complex can also
`display variable degrees of estrogen agonism (1). One class
`of estrogen analogs is the pharmaceutically-developed C7-
`alkyl substituted steroid analogs of estrogen (2—4). In the
`rodent, these antiestrogens possess both high affinity for the
`estrogen receptor and complete absence of uterotrophic ac-
`tivity. Although the lCl compound 164,384 has been reported
`to disable the ligand-receptor complex from binding to DNA
`(5), there is another report that the formed complex facilitates
`binding to DNA (6). It is the absence of estrogen agonism in
`reproductive tissues to which the terminology, pure anties-
`trogens, was initially referenced (2—5).
`Because of their high binding affinity and their lack of
`estrogen agonism, these estrogen antagonists have great po-
`tential as clinical chemoagents for breast cancer. The ability
`of lCl 182,780 (lCl) to inhibit cell growth, in fact, has been
`reported in MCF-7, as well as Br10 human breast cancer cells
`
`Received November 6, 1997.
`Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Russell T.
`Turner, Ph.D., Mayo Clinic, Department of Orthopedics, Medical Sci—
`ence Building 3—69, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
`E—mail: rolbiecki.lori@mayo.edu.
`* These studies were supported by NIH Grant AR—41418 and the
`Mayo Foundation.
`
`(3). The effectiveness of the C7 alkyl-substituted compounds
`in chemotherapy contrasts with tamoxifen, a pharmaceuti-
`cally-developed antiestrogen of a triphenylethylene struc-
`ture. Tamoxifen is the chemoagent of choice for defense in
`breast cancer (7—10). Tamoxifen though possesses partial es-
`trogen agonism in reproductive tissue. It is this degree of
`agonism that is thought to contribute to the acquired toler-
`ance of breast tumor cells after extended tamoxifen therapy
`(4, 11). Antiestrogens with complete absence of estrogen
`agonism, on the other hand, may be more rapid, more potent
`tumorstatic agents with longer lasting results (4, 12).
`In addition, the variable display of estrogen agonism by
`antiestrogens seems to be tissue-specific. A potential mech-
`anism for the tissue-selectivity of antiestrogens involves dif-
`ferential transactivational gene transcription by the estrogen
`receptor (13). The model proposes that capacity of the ligand-
`bound estrogen receptor to activate gene transcription is
`mediated by two distinct regions within the receptor mole-
`cule. Analogs of different antiestrogen classes could confer
`conformational changes to the estrogen receptor, thereby
`affecting the interaction, either positively or negatively, be-
`tween the ligand-bound estrogen receptor and DNA. Alter-
`natively, a second type of estrogen receptor, the estrogen
`receptor-[3, could account for tissue differences based on
`variable tissue distributions of receptors (14). Because of the
`tissue-selectivity and the variable degree of agonism in an-
`tiestrogens, it is important to investigate the tumorstatic es-
`trogen analogs, in terms of their side effects in nontumor,
`estrogen-responsive tissues. There are reports that these
`
`8786
`
`The E1docrine Society. Dovmloadedfrom pressendocrineorg by [${individualUse11displayName}] on 17 October 2014. at 11:18 For personal use only. No other uses wimoutpeimission. . All rights reserved.
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2164 p. l
`InnoPharma Licensing LLC v. AstraZeneca AB IPR2017-00904
`Fresenius-Kabi USA LLC v. AstraZeneca AB IPR2017-01910
`
`

`

`EFFECTS OF ICI 182,780 ON THE RAT TIBIA
`
`8737
`
`compounds may have detrimental effects on the skeletal
`system (15).
`Estrogen has similar effects on the rat and human skele-
`tons, and the response of the laboratory animal model to
`estrogen antagonists has successfully predicted the outcome
`in women (16). Thus, we investigated the effects of the ICI on
`skeletal tissue of female rats that were growing or sexually
`mature and either with or without ovaries.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`Animal procedures
`
`Procedures used in all animal experiments were approved by the
`institutional animal care and use committee at the Mayo Clinic in ac—
`cordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory
`Animals. All rats were fed laboratory chow ad libitum.
`
`Exp 1. Forty 10week—old female Sprague—Dawley rats (Harlan, India—
`napolis, IN) were used to evaluate the effects of ICI on skeletal growth
`and modeling. Thirty of the rats were divided into three groups of
`ovary—intact rats (n = 10): one group was injected with ICI, the second
`group was injected with the sesame oil vehicle, and the third served as
`the baseline control group. The baseline group was killed at the start of
`the treatment. A fourth group (n = 10) was ovariectomized 1 week
`before the start of the study (OVX group). ICI powder (Zeneca Phar—
`maceuticals, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK) was resuspended in 95% eth—
`anol to a 100 mg / ml Stock Solution. Each day, an aliquot of the stock
`solution was resuspended in sesame oil and sonicated for the delivery
`of a 1.5—mg /kg BW dose of ICI, based on an averaged weekly weight of
`rats for the 3—week study. A vol of 0.1 ml was injected sc at the back of
`the neck. Ovariectomized rats were injected with vehicle. The fluoro—
`chrome tetracycline (20 mg/ kg; Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) was
`injected at the base of the tail on the first day of treatment (day 1) and
`2 days before death (day 19). Another fluorochrome calcein (20 mg/kg;
`Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) was similarly injected 9 days before
`death (day 13). Rats were anesthetized by C02 inhalation and killed by
`guillotine decapitation. Wet weights of uteri were recorded. Tibiae were
`removed and fixed by immersion in 70% ethanol.
`
`Exp 2. Rats which were either ovariectomized or ovary—intact were
`treated with either ICI or vehicle. Forty female Sprague—Dawley rats
`(Harlan, Indianapolis, IN) at 6 months of age, were divided into 4 groups
`of approximately 10 (:2) rats each. Two groups were ovariectomized 1
`week before the start of treatment, and the other groups remained
`ovary—intact. One ovariectomized group and one ovary—intact group
`were treated groups and injected with ICI; the other ovariectomized and
`ovary—intact group were treatment controls and injected with vehicle. A
`small group of ovary—intact rats (n = 6) was killed on the first day of
`treatment. The bone fluorochrome tetracycline (20 mg/kg; Sigma Chem—
`icals, St. Louis, MO) was injected at the base of the tail on the first day
`(day 1) of the 8—week study and 2 days before death (day 54). The bone
`fluorochrome calcein (20 mg/ kg; Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) was
`similarly injected 12 days before death (day 44). The averaged body
`weight of the rats was recorded weekly. An aliquot of a 5% wt / vol stock
`solution of ICI in sesame oil (Zeneca Pharmaceutical, Macclesfield,
`Cheshire, UK) was diluted further in sesame oil for delivery of a 1.5—
`mg/ kg-day dose, based on the weekly averaged body weight. As in Exp
`1, a 0.1—ml vol was injected sc at the back of the neck daily throughout
`the 8—week study. Rats were anesthetized by C02 inhalation and killed
`by guillotine decapitation. Blood was drained from the carcass, clotted,
`and centrifuged for serum isolation. Serum aliquots were stored at —80
`C before assay. Wet weights of uteri were recorded. Tibiae were re—
`moved and fixed by immersion in 70% ethanol.
`
`Exp 3. Skeletal effects were evaluated in 8—month old ovary—intact female
`Sprague—Dawley rats (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN), treated for 52 days with
`ICI (n = 7). Rats were injected sc with ICI (Zeneca Pharmaceutical,
`Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK) or sesame oil vehicle (1.5 mg/ kg BW ICI).
`Rats were anesthetized by Ethrane inhalation and killed by exsangui—
`nation. Blood was obtained from the abdominal aorta. Tibiae were
`
`harvested and fixed, as in previous experiments, for cancellous bone
`histomorphometry.
`
`Bone histomorphometry
`
`Measurements for Exp 1 and 2 were performed with an SMI—Micro—
`comp semiautomatic image analysis system (Southern Micro Instru—
`ments, Inc., Atlanta, GA), which consists of a Compaq computer with
`microcomp software interfaced with a microscope and image analysis
`software. Measurements for Exp 3 were executed as for Exps 1 and 2,
`except for the image analysis software (OsteoMetrics, Inc., Atlanta, GA).
`Skeletal indices are measured by registering the movement of a digi—
`tizing pen across a graphics tablet as a tracing is superimposed on an
`image of the section displayed on the video screen. As regions of interest
`are traced in the bone specimen, the computer software records the
`lengths of tracings and calculates the enclosed areas.
`
`Cortical bone measurements. All corticalbone measurements of Exp 1 were
`made on unstained cross—sections obtained from the tibia—fibula synos—
`tosis using a low-speed saw equipped with a diamond wafer blade
`(Isomet, Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL). Cross—sections (150 um) were ground
`to 15—20 am on a roughened glass plate and permanently mounted.
`Fluorochrome labeling was visualized under reflected UV light. Cortical
`bone histomorphometry included cross—sectional area, medullary area,
`cortical area, periosteal bone formation rate, and periosteal mineral
`apposition rate and were performed as previously described (17), except
`for a bone growth period of 21 days.
`
`Cancelloas bone measurements. Proximal tibial metaphyses were dehy—
`drated in 95% ethanol for 1 day, followed by 6 days in 100% ethanol
`before embedding, without demineralization, in a mixture of methyl—
`methacrylate—2—hydroxyethyl—methacrylate (12.521). Parasagittal
`sec—
`tions were cut from the middle of the proximal tibia (5 pm thick) with
`a Reichert Jung microtome.
`All measurements, except for longitudinal growth rate, were con—
`ducted in a standard sampling site located in the secondary spongiosa
`of the metaphyseal region of the proximal tibia. This sampling site was
`located 1 mm from the most distal point of the epiphyseal growth plate,
`extended bilaterally, but excluded endocortical bone and encompassed
`a 2.88—mm2 tissue area (TAr). Mean longitudinal growth rate was de—
`termined as the distance from the calcein label to the metaphyseal
`growth plate cartilage at five equidistant sites across the growth plate.
`The mean distance was divided by the growth period of 9 days.
`The following indices were obtained or calculated from measure—
`ments performed in the metaphyseal sampling site, as previously de—
`scribed (17), and according to Parfitt et al. (18): cancellous bone area,
`cancellous bone perimeter, labeled bone perimeter, mineral apposition
`rate, bone formation rate, and osteoclast-covered perimeter. Indices of
`cancellous bone architecture, such as trabecular number, trabecular
`thickness and trabecular separation, were estimated according to stan—
`dard formulas (19).
`
`Serum measurements
`
`Measurements of 17B—estradiol in Exp 3 were made using a double—
`antibody RIA that has a minimum detectable limit of 1.4 pg /ml (Diag—
`nostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA). Cholesterol measure—
`ments in Exp 2 were measured by the Immtmochemical Core Facility at
`the Mayo Clinic using an automated procedure (Roche Diagnostic Sys—
`tem, Los Angeles, CA).
`
`Statistical analysis
`
`Comparisons between multiple pairs of groups were accomplished
`by application of Fisher’s protected least-significant difference (PLSD)
`post hoc test, after determination of significance by one—way ANOVA
`(Exp 1). Two—way ANOVA was performed to determine whether there
`is a significant effect of either ovarian status or ICI treatment or whether
`there is a significant interaction between the two factors (Exp 2). Sub—
`sequently, one-way ANOVA, followed by multiple—group comparisons
`with Fisher’s PLSD, were conducted to determine the significance of ICI
`treatment in the ovary—intact and in the ovariectomized rats, Student’s
`t test was performed for comparisons between ovary—intact control and
`ICI—treated rats (Exp 3). Statistical significance was considered at P
`values S 0.05.
`
`The Endocrine Society. Downloadedfrom pressendocrineorg by [$(individualUse1'. displayName}] on 17 October 2014. at 11:18 For personal use only. No other uses wimout permission. .Allrights reserved.
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2164 p. 2
`
`

`

`3738
`
`EFFECTS OF ICI 182,780 ON THE RAT TIBIA
`
`Endo - 1998
`Vol 139 I No 9
`
`Results
`
`Body growth, uterine weight, serum estradiol, and
`cholesterol
`
`For Exps 1—3, ICI had no negative effects on the husbandry
`or overall health status of the female rats. ICI had no direct
`
`effect on the final body weights of the treated animals, when
`compared with the vehicle controls, regardless of ovarian
`status (Table 1).
`
`Exp 1. Ovariectomy increased final body weight. Ovariec-
`tomy and ICI reduced uterine weight (Table 1).
`
`Exp 2. Ovariectomy increased final body weight, but there
`was no interaction of ovariectomy and ICI, by two-way
`ANOVA, on final body weight (Table 1). Two-way ANOVA
`revealed no effect of ovariectomy, a significant effect of ICI,
`and a significant interaction between ovariectomy and ICI on
`serum cholesterol levels. ICI significantly increased serum
`cholesterol in ovary-intact (25%) but not in ovariectomized
`rats (2%) (see Table 3).
`
`Exp 3. ICI increased circulating levels of 17B-estradiol almost
`10-fold in the ovary-intact rats (18.8 i 3.5 pg/ml ICI US. 1.8 i
`0.8 pg/ml VEH, P 5 0.0001). Serum 17B-estradiol was not
`detectable in ovariectomized rats.
`
`Skeletal data
`
`Exp 1. ICI had no effect on cross-sectional area, medullary
`area, and cortical area measured at
`the tibia diaphysis,
`whereas ovariectomy and ICI similarly increased rates of
`mineral apposition and bone formation measured at the
`same site (Table 2). Ovariectomy increased longitudinal
`growth at the proximal tibial metaphysis in the young rats,
`whereas ICI treatment of intact rats had no effect on longi-
`tudinal growth rate (Fig. 1).
`
`Exp 2. Ovariectomy increased dynamic indices of bone for-
`mati on (labeled bone perimeter, mineral apposition rate, and
`bone formation rate) in cancellous bone (P 5 001-0005),
`increased the percent of osteoclast—covered perimeter (Fig. 2),
`and decreased indices of cancellous bone volume (bone area,
`trabecular number), had no effect on trabecular thickness,
`and increased trabecular separation (Table 3). ICI had no
`effect on labeled bone perimeter and on bone formation rate
`but decreased mineral apposition rate. However, there was
`an interaction between ovarian status and ICI on the labeled
`
`bone perimeter, such that ICI increased labeled perimeter in
`ovary-intact rats and decreased this measurement in ovari-
`ectomized animals. Neither of these effects was significant in
`group comparisons after one-way ANOVA. As presented in
`Table 3 and Fig. 2, significant interaction between ovarian
`status and ICI was evident for cancellous bone area (BAr/
`TAr), bone-forming perimeters (LPm/TPm), and osteoclast-
`covered perimeter (Och), and for the architectural indices
`of trabecular number (TbN) and separation (TbSp), Le. the
`direction of ICI’s actions was dependent on ovarian status
`(Table 3 and Fig. 2). ICI decreased measurements related to
`bone volume and bone-forming surfaces in ovary-intact rats
`but increased these values in the ovariectomized rats.
`
`Exp 3. ICI increased the percent of double-labeled perimeter
`(62% increase) in cancellous bone of ovary-intact rats but had
`no effect on mineral apposition rate (Fig. 3). ICI increased the
`percent of double-labeled perimeter (63.8 i 11.3 mm ICI vs.
`14.6 i 4.1 mm vehicle, P 5 0.001) and the rates of mineral
`apposition (1.28 i 0.11 lam/day ICI US. 0.97 i 0.15 lam/day
`vehicle, NS) and bone formation (89.4 i 12.7 mmZ/day X
`10’3 ICI US. 36.2 i 10.2 mmZ/day X 10’3 vehicle, P 5 0.001)
`at the periosteal surface of cortical bone of ovary-intact rats.
`
`Discussion
`
`ICI binds with high affinity to both ERa and ERB (14).
`Early investigations failed to detect any transcriptional ac-
`tivity in the estrogen receptor-ICI complex, suggesting that
`the ICI-bound receptor is unproductive and implying that
`ICI functions as a pure estrogen antagonist. As a conse-
`quence, the observed skeletal response to ICI in the rat was
`unanticipated.
`ICI's effects on the uterus, however, are consistent with
`previous reports. ICI resulted in uterine atrophy comparable
`with ovariectomy in ovary-intact rats and had no uterotro-
`phic activity in the ovariectomized rat. These findings are in
`agreement with the results of Lundeen et al. (20), who re-
`ported that ICI, itself, displayed no uterotrophic activity in
`the ovariectomized rat but blocked uterine stimulation by
`17a-ethynyl estradiol when administered together. These
`effects of ICI contrast with those of triphenylethylene and
`benzothiophene antiestrogens, which, besides being com-
`petitive inhibitors of estradiol, possess partial uterotrophic
`activity (20).
`In addition, ICI contrasts with the nonsteroidal antiestro-
`
`TABLE 1. ICI has no effect on body growth but reduces uterine weight comparable with ovariectomy
`
`Exp 1
`Exp 2
`EXP 3
`Uterine
`Initial
`Uterine
`Initial
`Uterine
`Final
`Final
`Final
`Initial
`Measurement :>
`Group ‘U
`body weight body weight
`weight
`body weight body weight
`weight
`body weight body weight
`weight
`
`(g)
`(g)
`(mg)
`(g)
`(g)
`(mg)
`(g)
`(g)
`(mg)
`
`ND
`ND
`ND
`276 i 10“ 429 i 21‘“)
`270 i 10
`402 : 25‘1’1’
`238 i 2
`229 i 2
`Baseline (intact) (n = 6—10)
`595 : 64b
`284 i 6
`272 i 8
`299 i 5“
`518' : 38‘1”!)
`268 i 5
`472 i 39‘”
`258 i 3“
`227 i 3
`Intact control (n = 10—11)
`141 i 9
`284 i 5
`272 i 7
`287 i 6“
`175 i 13
`272 i 10
`170 i 11
`252 i 3“
`226 i 2
`Intact + ICI (I1 = 10—11)
`NA
`NA
`NA
`348 : 10Z7
`172 i 10
`273 i 7
`152 i 10
`299 i 317
`223 i 2
`OVX Control (11 = 11—12)
`
`OVX + ICI (n = 9—12) NA NA NA NA 268 i 4 345 : 5Z7 156 i 13 NA NA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`’IVVO-way ANOVA for Exp 2: the effects of ovariectomy and ICI treatment were significant, with significant interaction between the two factors
`for uterine weight (P S .0001). For final body weight, there was a significant effect of ovariectomy only (P S .0001), with no significant interaction
`between surgery and ICI treatment. One-way ANOVA; comparison to ovariectomized control rats: a P S .0001; comparison to ICI-treated intact
`rats; b P S .0001. Values are means : SE. NA, Not applicable; ND, not determined.
`
`The Endocrine Society. Downloadedfrom pressendocrineorg by [$(individualUse1'. displayName}] on 17 October 2014. at 11:18 For personal use only. No other uses wimout permission. .Allrights reserved.
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2164 p. 3
`
`

`

`EFFECTS OF ICI 182,780 ON THE RAT TIBIA
`
`3739
`
`TABLE 2. Exp 1. ICI stimulates radial growth in growing, ovary-intact rats
`Periosteal mineral
`Periosteal bone
`Cross-sectional area
`Cortical area
`Medullary area
`Measurement 3;
`Groups ll
`(m1n2)
`(m1n2)
`(m1n2)
`apIEEE/lggyfiate
`fofififglfiagite
`
`Baseline (intact) (n = 10)
`0.91 i 0.06
`3.5 i 0.1
`4.4 i 0.1
`ND
`ND
`Intact -- VEH (n = 11)
`0.90 i 0.04
`3.6 i 0.1
`4.5 i 0.1
`1.78 i 0.14
`0.014 : 0.001
`
`Intact -- ICI (n = 11)
`0.85 i 0.04
`3.7 i 0.1
`4.5 i 0.1
`2.71 i 0.44”
`0.021 : 0.003”
`
`OVX + VEH (n = 11)
`0.90 i 0.03
`3.7 i 0.1
`4 6 i 0 1
`2.79 i 0.21”
`0.021 : 0.002”
`
`Means : SEM; 11, Number of measured animals per group. Cortical bone formation rate over 2 1 days. One-way ANOVA: comparison to (intact +
`VEH) group: ”P S .05.
`
`80
`
`4;
`
`
`
`
`
`LongitudinalGrowthRate(um/d)
`
`S
`
`'38
`
`O
`
`I ovx
`
`E INTACT
`
`
`
`
`
`Osteoclast-coveredPerimeter(%)
`
`U)
`
`HN
`
`O
`
`s-1
`O
`E
`O
`
`H
`U
`“
`
`.—1
`O
`EZ
`0
`
`ICI
`
`CONTROL
`
`FIG. 1. Effect of ICI on longitudinal growth rate in growing rats (Exp
`1). Estrogen deficiency with ovariectomy (dark bar) increased the
`longitudinal growth rate but ICI treatment of ovary-intact rats
`(hatched bar) had no effect on longitudinal growth rate. a, P 5 0.0001
`vs. ovary-intact group. Values are means : SE; n = 8—11.
`
`gens in its effects on body weight. Ovariectomy increases
`body weight (21, 22), and estrogen replacement therapy pre-
`vents this change (21—23), which is similarly mimicked by
`tamoxifen (17, 24) and raloxifene (22). This weight gain is
`associated with increased food consumption, exhibits a pre-
`dominant accumulation of fat, but cannot be completely pre-
`vented by matching the food intake of ovariectomized rats to
`the amount ingested by ovary-intact animals (21, 23). The
`change in body weight, therefore, suggests an alteration in
`metabolism. The exact mechanism of body weight increase
`is unclear, although it is under central regulation (25). ICI had
`no influence on the expected weight changes after ovariec-
`tomy. Our observation was similarly noted by Wakeling (3),
`which he attributed to the failure of ICI to cross the blood-
`
`brain barrier (26).
`The effects of estrogen and estrogen deficiency on serum
`cholesterol in the rat model have been recently characterized
`(20). Triphenylethylene and benzothiophene antiestrogens
`have similar levels of estrogen agonism on bone and serum
`cholesterol (20). We investigated the effects of ICI on serum
`cholesterol, but results are inconclusive. Though ovariec-
`tomy did not increase serum cholesterol in this study, ICI
`increased serum cholesterol when given in the presence of
`ovaries. An effect of ovariectomy on serum cholesterol is not
`
`FIG. 2. Effect of ICI on osteoclast-covered bone perimeter in adult
`rats (Exp 2). ICI decreases the extent of osteoclasts on bone surfaces
`of the ovariectomized rats (dark bar), P S 0.01 by Fisher PLSD; but
`tends to increase osteoclasts in the ovary-intact rats (hatched bar), NS
`by Fisher PLSD. By two-way ANOVA, effect of ovariectomy: P S
`0.001; effect ofICI: NS; interaction, P S 0.02. Values are means : SE;
`n = 5—7.
`
`always seen in our laboratory (27) or in others (28). In one
`instance, we observed an increase in serum cholesterol in
`ovariectomized rats (22), whereas in another study, we saw
`no change (27). Estrogen's regulation of circulating choles-
`terol levels in the rat involves a complex array of processes,
`many of which remain to be defined (20). We and others,
`however, have seen a consistent reduction of circulating cho-
`lesterol in ovariectomized rats treated with estrogen, triph-
`enylethylene, and benzothiophene antiestrogens (20, 22, 27,
`28). In this study, ICI had no effect on circulating cholesterol
`in the ovariectomized rat when analyzed by one-way
`ANOVA.
`
`The skeletal effects of ovariectomy and estrogen replace-
`ment have been well characterized in the rat (21, 23, 29—31).
`The ovariectomized reference groups in this study consis-
`tently displayed the skeletal effects of estrogen deficiency
`(21, 23, 29—32) at the examined sites in the tibia. The antic-
`ipated increases in radial and longitudinal bone growth and
`cancellous osteopenia were all manifested. The cancellous
`bone of the adult ovariectomized rat exhibited increased
`
`indicies of bone turnover (30, 31, 33).
`Young ovary-intact rats were selected specifically to in-
`
`The Endocrine Society. Downloaded from pressendocrineorg by [$(individualUser.displayName}] on 17 October 2014. at 11:18 For personal use only. No other uses wimout permission. . All rights reserved.
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2164 p. 4
`
`

`

`TABLE 3. Exp 2. The effects of ICI treatment on cancellous bone histomorphometry and serum cholesterol are influenced by ovarian status
`
`
`Measurement é
`Cancellous
`Labeled
`Mineral
`Bone
`Trabecular
`Trabecular
`Trabecular
`Serum Cholesterol
`
`Group U’
`bone area
`bone pe’rlmeter
`app0s1t10n rate
`formatlon rate
`thlckness
`number
`separation
`(mg/d1)
`(% BAr/TAr)
`(.% LPm/TPIn)
`(Mm/day)
`(mm2/day)
`(Mm)
`(mm 1)
`(Mm)
`
`0171.8
`
`Intact
`Control
`ICI
`Ovariectomy
`Control
`ICI
`2-way ANOVA
`Ovariectomy P S
`ICI Treatment P S
`Interaction P S
`Group comparisons post
`1-way ANOVA
`.0001
`NS
`.005
`NS
`NS
`NS
`.05
`Intact : ICI P S
`
`Ovariectomy : ICI P S
`NS
`NS (.06)
`.05
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`
`0.67 i 0.07
`0.48 i 0.04
`
`0.73 1‘ 0.06
`0.69 i 0.03
`
`0.050 : 0.009
`0.058 : 0.013
`
`0.157 : 0.031
`0.103 : 0.016
`
`45.7 i 2.7
`44.3 i 2.6
`
`43.0 i 6.2
`44.4 i 3.0
`
`NS
`
`.0005
`NS
`NS
`
`NS
`NS
`NS
`
`3.1 i .2
`2.0 i .3
`
`1.4 i .2
`1.9 i .2
`
`.001
`NS
`.005
`
`346 i 34
`553 i 72
`
`833 i 123
`618 i 95
`
`.01
`NS
`.05
`
`108.6 : 5.2
`135.5 : 4.5
`
`122.1 : 4.4
`124.7 : 2.9
`
`NS
`.001
`.01
`
`14.4 i 1.8
`8.8 i 1.5
`
`5.9 i 1.2
`9.0 i 1.2
`
`.01
`NS
`.01
`
`7.2 i 0 9
`11.5 i 2 5
`
`21.3 i 4.1
`14.6 i 2.0
`
`.01
`NS
`.05
`
`Values are means : SEM; n = 6 —12 animals per group. ’IWo-way ANOVA was performed to evaluate significant effects of surgery, ICI treatment or significant interaction between
`the two factors. One-way ANOVA, followed by Fisher PLSD, was performed to evaluate significant effects of ICI treatment in rats per ovarian status. Intact, OvaIy-intact rats;
`TPm, Total bone perimeter.
`
`
`
`VIHLLiLVHHHLNOOSL‘ZBIIOI.E[OSiLOELflcIIH
`
`
`
`
`
`Bone Formation Rate (x 10-3 umzld)
`
`
`
`ICI
`
`Mineral Apposition Rate (um/d)
`
`Double-labeled Perimeter (%)
`
`
`
`001
`
`0'9[
`
`OOZ
`
`
`
`|II||II|IIIIIIIIIi
`
`The Endocrine Society. Downloaded from pressendocrine.org by [$(individualUser.displayNarne}] on 17 October 2014. at 11:18 For personal use only. No other uses without permission. . All rights reserved.
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2164 p. 5
`
`60N'GET[0A866T'OPUS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`spuenBursoddo9inJOJIHSQJesV'(gdxg)euoqsnoueoueoInJaqempl-edpeIQqBI-emnoppunuorusodde[219111111110IOIJo139553‘8‘Olfl
`
`
`
`~L=ufas
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:stream9112sameAsum1319111;5.113110pQIQQJJ-IOIfimqpan/91m]$10.13,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-uooeprquJacqui-MEAD‘mq.mayg‘seorpur0m;911;JOqonpmdeqa,
`
`
`
`
`
`s111:)qu‘(0)93,191uoiqeumo}euoq911:1Ineseemurimagiufirsousem
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9,191.13,‘(g)9421uorqrsodde[Eleurmp112(v)JeiampradpQIQqEI-qunopur
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`EFFECTS OF ICI 182,780 ON THE RAT TIBIA
`
`8741
`
`vestigate the effects of ICI on bone growth. Radial and lon-
`gitudinal bone growth normally change with age in parallel
`and both are inhibited by estrogen (23, 34). ICI increased the
`periosteal bone formation and mineral apposition rates in
`growing ovary-intact rats to a magnitude nearly identical to
`ovariectomy, indicating that the drug is a potent estrogen
`antagonist on the periosteum.
`Paradoxically, ICI did not influence longitudinal bone
`growth in parallel to its effects on radial bone growth. Lon-
`gitudinal bone growth occurs as a result of proliferation and
`hypertrophy of cartilage cells in the growth plate (35),
`whereas radial bone growth is determined by the number
`and activity of osteoblasts at the periosteal surface (36). Our
`results suggest that estrogen either does not act to regulate
`longitudinal bone growth Via an estrogen receptor-mediated
`pathway or that ICI does not have access to estrogen target
`cells in the growth plate. The growth plate is avascular, and
`it is possible that there are differences in the ability of ICI and
`natural estrogens to diffuse through the extracellular matrix
`that separates chondrocytes. We recognize, however, that the
`effect of estrogen deficiency by ovariectomy on longitudinal
`growth rate is, itself, transient (28, 29) and subsides generally
`by 6 weeks after surgery.
`Older animals, however, were used exclusively for mea-
`surements of remodeling in cancellous bone of the tibia (37).
`The rates of radial or longitudinal bone growth measured in
`the older rats of Exps 2 and 3 were very low, which reflects
`the skeletal maturity of these animals. We only reported data
`on radial and longitudinal growth from the young animals,
`because
`formation rates
`could
`be more
`accurately
`determined.
`
`In the mature rats, we observed that the effects of ICI on
`cancellous bone mass and most indices of bone remodeling
`depended on gonadal status. The effects of ICI on cancellous
`bone area, labeled bone perimeter, trabecular number, tra-
`becular separation, and osteoclast-covered perimeter were
`consistent with a potent estrogen antagonist in the presence
`of significant levels of serum estrogen, as found in ovary-
`intact rats. In the ovariectomized rat, where serum estrogen
`is significantly less, ICI behaved as a weak partial estrogen
`agonist on the same indices of cancellous bone architecture
`and turnover. Gallagher et al. (15) also show a detrimental
`effect of ICI on cancellous bone volume in growing sham-
`operated rats, but the actions of ICI on cancellous bone vol-
`ume in ovariectomized rats were not investigated. The ob-
`servations of our study led us to the inescapable conclusion
`that, in contrast to the reproductive tissues, ICI is not a pure
`estrogen antagonist in bone, and ICI seems to be capable of
`transcriptional activation.
`This conclusion is further supported by the observed
`changes in the cancellous mineral apposition rate. The min-
`eral apposition rate generally reflects osteoblast activity,
`whereas the previously discussed labeled perimeter reflects
`osteoblast number (36). Ovariectomy results in a small in-
`crease in the mineral apposition rate, which is prevented by
`treatment with estrogen (32, 38, 39). The observed reduction
`in the mineral apposition rate of ovary-intact rats and the
`reducing trend observed in the ovariectomized rats indicate
`that the actions of ICI on osteoblast activity are of an estrogen
`agonist. These observations suggest that ICI differentially
`
`influences the estrogen-regulated pathways that mediate the
`hormone’s actions on osteoblast number and activity.
`The bone formation rate, for instance, is the product of
`osteoblast number and activity. Ovariectomy results in in-
`creases in the number and activity of osteoblasts and, as a
`consequence, leads to a large increase in the bone formation
`rate. In contrast, ICI was primarily an estrogen antagonist on
`osteoblast number and an estrogen agonist on osteoblast
`activity. As a consequence of the two opposing tendencies,
`ICI had no net effect on the calculated bone formation rate.
`
`We did not measure bone resorption, but a measurement of
`osteoclast-covered perimeter indicates that ICI was a estro-
`gen agonist on osteoclast number in the ovariectomized rats.
`And, though there is only a tendency for osteoclasts to be
`increased by ICI in the ovary-intact rat, the observed os—
`teopenia, without an accompanying reduction in bone for-
`mation, implicates an elevation in bone resorption.
`If ICI were unable to activate transcription when bound to
`the estrogen receptor in reproductive tissues, then the ob-
`served estrogen agonism of ICI on bone would be thro

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket