throbber
a The protein array pionee
`
`.
`
`ELISA Kits
`
`Browsie
`
`
`Alli
`
`
`
`iic'iii;8éi.:?acnigged
`Manufactured in the USA
`
`ElLISAS
`
`
`"7 Over 2000 Validated
`RyRayBiotech »
`See What You Have
`
`Been MlSSlng
`firejournal qr
`Immunologic Impairment in
`n 1
`Mice Treated Intravenously
`Immu O ogy with Killed Coccidioides
`Immitis Spherules: Suppressed
`ThIS information IS current as Res onse t0 Intramuscular
`of September 19, 2016.
`DOSES
`
`H. B. Levine and Yi-Chi M. Kong
`
`J Immunol 1966; 97:297—305; ;
`http ://WWw.j immunol . org/content/97/3 /29
`7
`
`Subscriptions
`
`Information about subscribing to The Journal of
`Immunology is online at:
`http :.//jimmunol.org/subscriptions
`
`Permissions
`
`Submit copyright permission requests at:
`http://www.aai.org/ji/copyrighthtml
`
`Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this
`
`article. Sign up at:
`http://jimmunol.org/cgi/alerts/etOc
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9103‘61loqutoldagno1san3ziqxfilomunumnl'mmgflduqu101_1papnoplmoq
`
`The Journal of Imrmnol ogy is published twice each month by
`The American Association of Immunologists, Inc,
`9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20814-3 994.
`Copyright © 1966- by The American Association of
`Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
`Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606.
`
`
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2130 p. l
`InnoPharma Licensing LLC v. AstraZeneca AB
`IPR2017-009‘04
`
`Fresenius-Kabi USA LLC v. AstraZeneca AB
`
`IPR2017-01910
`
`

`

`THE JOURNAL on IMMUNOLOGY
`Copyright © 1966 by The Williams & Wilkins Co.
`
`Vol. 97, No. 3
`Printed in USA.
`
`IMMUNOLOGIC IMPAIRMENT IN MICE TREATED INTRAVENOUSLY
`WITH KILLED COCCIDIOIDES IMMITIS SPHERULES: SUPPRESSED
`RESPONSE TO INTRAMUSCULAR DOSES1
`
`H. B. LEVINE AND YI-CHI M. KONG
`
`From the Naval Biological Laboratory, School of Public Health, University of California,
`Berkeley, California
`
`Received for publication March 28, 1966
`
`In earlier studies (1, 2), formalin—killed spher-
`ule vaccines of Coccidfoides immitt’s were found
`
`to be very eflficacious in mice and monkeys when
`administered by the subcutaneous and intra—
`muscular (i.m.) routes. We recently investigated
`intravenous (i.v.) vaccination because Larson
`et al. (3*) observed that it was strikingly effective
`with particulate tubercular antigens (in oil) and
`also because it had been used on occasion to test
`
`other fungal vaccines.
`i.v.
`immitis,
`In the present study with C.
`administered spherules not only immunized mice
`poorly, but prevented the development of strong
`immunity from i.m. doses given up to 35 days
`earlier. Animals so treated succumbed to chal—
`
`in contrast,
`lenge with approximately 5 LD50;
`those vaccinated by the i.m. route alone survived
`11p to 200 LDso.
`The attributes of this deficient response were
`of concern for several reasons: with the possible
`exception of Cryptococcus (4), the reaction had not
`generally been reported for fungal antigens and,
`inasmuch as it was demonstrable primarily by iv.
`injection, the possibility was raised that a similar
`reaction might have been a factor in poor immunity
`to numerous other fungi following i.v. vaccina-
`tion and/0r challenge (5). Finally, impaired im—
`munity was markedly pronounced in our model
`which differed from others demonstrating unre-
`sponsiveness in that the challenge was adminis-
`tered intranasally, producing primarily pulmo-
`nary disease (6), and that the particulate vaccines
`producing impaired immunity were comprised of
`structures degraded very slowly in vivo (7).
`
`1 This work was sponsored by the Office of Naval
`Research and the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery,
`United States Navy, under a contract between the
`Office of Naval Research and the Regents of the
`University of California. Reproduction in whole
`or in part is permitted for any purpose of the
`Unite d States Government.
`
`Impaired immunity to Coccidioides was medi-
`ated by immunospecific substances, but heat-
`killed preparations of reduced immunogenicity
`were still effective. With formalin—killed prepara-
`tions, there was no adverse effect on existing im-
`munity when the i.v. dose followed the i.rn. dose
`by 1% to 3 months; i.v. treatment at 3 months
`actually potentiated immunity. Although the
`mechanisms of the deficient response are obscure,
`its major features are similar to those described
`for
`immunologic unresponsiveness induced by
`soluble bacterial and other antigens (8, 9).
`
`METHOD S
`
`The Silveira strain of C.
`
`immitis was used
`
`throughout. Mice were vaccinated with spherules
`or endospores cultured and formalin-killed as de—
`scribed earlier (1, 10). The animals were later
`challenged intranasally (11) with the arthrospore
`phase of the fungus. The vaccine and challenge
`doses, and the intervals between them, were
`varied and are detailed in conjunction with in-
`dividual experiments. Census of fungal numbers
`in the lungs of mice was made as described
`earlier (6).
`Spherule walls were isolated and purified from
`mechanically disrupted, formalin-killed spherules
`as described by Kong et al. (12) with the modifi-
`cation that a Braun Model MSK homogenizer
`(Brownwill Scientific, Rochester, N. Y.) was used;
`the soluble protoplasmic material was separated,
`filtered (12) and investigated for its influence on
`immunity and suppression of immunity. Simi—
`larly, the effect of iv. injection of intact Crypto—
`coccus neoformans or Saccharomyces cercvist'ae on
`both responses was studied with formalin-killed
`organisms. C’ryptococcus was grown in heart
`infusion broth (Difco) for 48 hr with shaking at
`35°C and commercial baker’s yeast cake was the
`source of Saecharomyoes. In one experiment non—
`formalinized, autoclaved (121°C, 18 hr) spherules
`
`297
`
`
`
`
`
`9103‘61requioidegnoisonfiziqxfiiowunumnf'mat/[duqwonpopcoplmoq
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2130 p. 2
`
`

`

`298
`
`H. B. LEVINE AND YI-CHI M. KONG
`
`[von 97
`
`TABLE I
`
`Mortality in mice challenged inti'anasally with
`Coccidioides
`immitis after vaccination by
`difierent routes with formalin—
`killed spherules
`Dead/Total (30 Days Postchallenge)
`Challeng~
`ing£059,
`Vaccinated“
`12mg
`
`(o.A h -
`532:5
`Control its lie 23%;? ”5“.
`arm:
`i.v.
`
`
`2/9
`40
`7/10
`60
`7/10
`110
`6/10 3/10
`1/3
`10/10 0/10 0/10
`275
`9/10 8/10
`2/5
`0/10 0/10
`480
`10/10 7/9
`5/5
`1/10 1/10
`2040
`
`
`
`
`2/9 1/10 ——°4200 10/10 6/10
`
`were also studied for the effects mentioned above.
`
`All preparations for i.v. use were sedimented
`repeatedly by centrifugation and resuspended in
`pyrogen—free saline (Cutter Laboratories, Berke-
`ley, Calif.); the final suspensions were adjusted
`to permit later specified doses to be given in a
`volume of 0.5 ml. When the suspensions were to
`be used over a period of several days or weeks,
`1 :10,000 Merthiolate (final concentration) was
`added.
`Female NAMRU albino mice, penbred in our
`laboratory, were employed in these experiments.
`The animals were 6 to 12 Weeks old at the incep-
`tion of different experiments, but in any one ex-
`periment their age varied no more than 2 weeks.
`RESULTS
`
`“ With % indicated dosage on days 0, 7 and 14;
`challenged on day 42.
`" I.m. = intramuscularly; i.v. = intravenously.
`0 No data.
`
`The weak immunologic response of mice vac-
`cinated i.V. with killed spherules and the mark-
`edly impaired response in mice given vaccine by
`both the i.v. and i.m. routes are shown in Table I.
`
`TABLE II
`
`The influence of spherule dose given intravenously (11.2).) on immunity to Coccidioides immitis induced by
`intramuscular (i.m.) injection of vaccine
`% Mortalityb (30 Days Postchallenge)
`Mg Spherules per Dose“
`Experiment
`and Route (5)
`Challenging dose (no. arthrospores):
`24
`43
`89
`250
`350
`465
`740
`115041220 2400—3050
`
`
`None
`0.4 i.v.
`0.4 i.m.
`0.8 i.m.
`0.4 i.m. -|- 0.04 i.V.
`0.4 i.m. + 0.2 i.v.
`0.4i.1’n. + 0.4 i.v.
`0.4 i.m. + 0.6 i.V.
`
`100
`94
`10
`11
`39
`61
`44
`38
`
`100
`94
`0
`0
`45
`70
`61
`31
`
`100
`89
`22
`0
`70
`65
`83
`50
`
`100
`100
`50
`50
`47
`79
`82
`66
`
`44
`
`22
`
`78
`
`None
`0.4 i.V.
`0.4 i.m.
`0.8 i.m.
`0.41.111. -- 0.012 i.V.
`0.41.11). + 0.025 i.V.
`0.4 i.m. -- 0.05 i.V.
`0.4 i.m. —— 0.1 i.v.
`0.4 i.m. —— 0.2 i.v.
`0.4 i.m. —— 0.4 i.v.
`
`90
`89
`0
`0
`8
`8
`8
`33
`33
`33
`
`100
`0
`22
`25
`8
`8
`42
`83
`67
`
`100
`50
`0
`9
`55
`45
`42
`75
`58
`
`100
`30
`14
`80
`40
`67
`33
`80
`75
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9103‘61loqmo‘idogno15mgAqxfiiomunumnf'mm/[duq11101}popnoplmoq
`
`‘1 Indicated doses given on days 0, 7 and 14; mice challenged intranasally on day 49 (Exp. 1) or on
`day 46 (Exp. 2).
`5 From 7 to 20 mice per group; mice, treated by both i.m. + i.v. routes, were composed of 10 to 20
`per group.
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2130 p. 3
`
`

`

`1966]
`
`IMMUNOLOGIC IMPAIRMENT TO 0. IMMITIS
`
`299
`
`Whereas 60 or more arthrospores administered in-
`tranasally were lethal to 70 to 100% of nonvac-
`cinated mice, animals that had been immunized
`i.m. with three doses of spherules, totaling 1.2
`or 2.4 mg, were well protected against challenge
`doses of up to at least 4200 arthrospores. Neither
`vaccine dosage was very effective when given
`iv; immunity so induced was sufficient only
`to reduce mortality rates in mice challenged
`with liSO or fewer arthrospores. This was also the
`
`TABLE III
`
`Influence of spherule vaccine given intravenously.
`on mortality after challenge with Coccid'ioides
`immitis
`% Mortality“ (30 Days Postchallenge)
`Challenging dose (no. arthrospores):
`Spherule Dose
` 60 150 630
`
`
`mg
`80
`0.0
`90
`60
`0.00001
`100
`95
`0.0001
`70
`100
`0 . 001
`90
`63
`0 . 01
`90
`100
`0 . 1
`
`
`921 . O 100
`
`50
`
`" From 10 to 15 mice per group; challenged in-
`tranasally ’40 days after vaccination.
`
`case in mice vaccinated i.m. with 1.2 mg of
`vaccine if they received concurrently an addi-
`tional 1.2 mg i.v., notwithstanding the eflficacy
`of 1.2 or 2.4 mg when given by the i.m. route
`alone.
`
`The impaired response of i.m. vaccinated mice
`also treated iv with the antigenic preparation is
`again evident in Table II; those given iv. as little
`as 120 to 150 ug of intact spherules were poorly
`immunized. These dosages contained insufficient
`antigen to confer immunity by the i.m. route (10).
`Nor was immunity to 150 to 630 arthrospores in-
`duced by any i.v. dose of spherules between 0.01
`,ug and 1.0 mg (Table III). Conversely, suppressed
`immunity did not follow i.m. injection of 20 mg
`of spherules or 4.5 mg of spherule walls (Table
`IV), the major locus of immunogens (12). The
`immunogen content of 4.5 mg of walls corre-
`sponded approximately to that of 18 to 22 mg of
`intact spherules.
`Spherule walls, given by different routes, in-
`duced the same responses in mice as intact organ.
`isms: They were highly immunogenic by the i.m,
`route, poorly immunogenic by the i.v. route and-
`when administered i.v., impaired the response to
`i.m. doses (Table V). We were therefore interested
`in determining if the soluble protoplasmic moiety
`of spherules, which is poorly immunogenic except
`
`TABLE IV
`
`Influence an immunity to Coccidioides immitis of dose of spherule walls and
`intact spherules given intramuscularly (i.m.)
`% Mortality“ (30 Days Postchallenge)
`Challenging dose (no. arthrospores):
`
`Preparation
`
`Dose
`
`Spherule walls
`
`Intact spherules
`
`Me
`
`0
`0 . 0045
`0.045
`0.45
`4.5
`
`0
`2.0
`6.0
`10.0
`20.0
`
`30
`40-50
`75—100
`175
`455
`fit?)
`4,800
`$69,335
`15,000
`55,000
`
`
`30
`
`90
`
`70
`70
`10
`10
`0
`
`100
`30
`30
`0
`
`100
`11
`30
`0
`
`100
`50
`20
`0
`
`100
`60
`50
`30
`
`70
`
`40
`
`100
`
`90
`40
`20
`10
`0
`29
`20
`30
`0
`40
`20
`20
`0
`
`
`
`70600 20
`
`
`
`9103‘61leqmeldegno15mgziqxfiromunumnf'mmm/fduq11101}pepeopI/noq
`
`
`
`
`
`“ From 7 to 11 mice per group. Vaccinated With kc: indicated dosage on days 0, 7 and 14 (spherule
`walls) or % indicated dosage on days 0, 7, 14 and 20 (intact organisms); challenged intranasally 22
`or 29 days respectively later.
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2130 p. 4
`
`

`

`800
`
`H. B. LEVINE AND YI—CHI M. KONG
`
`[VOL. 97
`
`TABLE V
`
`Influence on immunity of Coccidioides immitis spherule fractions given intramuscularly (i.m.) and/07“
`intravenously (Lu)
`Dead/Total (33 Days Postchallenge)
`Treatment“
`
`
`Challenge
`231356 (No'
`1'
`rospores
`
`)
`
`9.3 mglwailss
`0 3
`0'5 13g 150mb
`o s
`d’
`F
`1 bl
`11
`.
`03
`03
`S
`116111]
`LI“. 1) 115
`.
`. mg W3- 5
`pro Op-aSmlC
`. mg 50 u . 6
`NW
`“an” must-5m
`1:22am?
`$123331:
`wan???“ heats-W peasant
`adjuvant 1.m.
`fraction i.v.
`
`
`1 /10
`5/10
`7/11
`
`3/ 10
`5/10
`7/10
`
`20
`40
`0/10
`0/10
`6/10
`80
`0/10
`5/9
`9/10
`0/10
`130
`3/9
`6/8
`7/8
`1/10
`475
`
`1150 3/10
`
`2/10
`4/10
`6/10
`
`0/10
`0/10
`0/10
`
`‘1 With % indicated dosage on days 0, 7, 14; challenged intranasally on day 44.
`'7 Freund’s complete adjuvant, 1:1 with either saline or soluble protoplasmic fraction.
`
`TABLE VI
`
`to mice
`Influence an immunity to Coccidioides immitis of autoclaved spherules given intravenously (131).)
`mocinaded intramuscularly (i.m.)
`Dead/Total (30 Days Postchallenge)
`
`Treatment“
`Challenging dose (no. arthrospore’s):
`so
`120
`1200
`
`
`8/10
`None
`5/10
`3/10
`1.0 mg spherules i.m.
`5/10
`0/10
`2.0 mg spherules i.m.
`8/9
`7/10
`1.0 mg autoclaved spherules i.m.
`10/10
`4/10
`2.0 mg autoclaved spherules i.m.
`6/6
`4/5
`1.0 mg autoclaved spherules i.v.
`8/8
`2/8
`1.0 mg spherules i.m. plus 1.0 mg spherules i.v.
`
`1.0 mg spherules i.m. plus 1.0 mg autoclaved spherules i.v. 6/6 2/6
`
`
`3/10
`
`“ One dose as shown on day 0; mice challenged intranasally on day 30. Spherules were killed by for-
`malin, except those designated “autoclave-d” which were killed by heating at 121 °C for 18 hr.
`
`when emulsified with Freund’s complete adj u—
`vant (12) , similarly impaired the response of mice.
`The findings in Table V show that the weakly im-
`munogenic soluble fraction, given i.V., suppressed
`only slightly the development of i.m. induced im—
`munity. The relationship between the capacities
`of a preparation to confer immunity by the i.m.
`route and to suppress it by the i.V. route was not,
`however, an uncomplicated function of immuno-
`genieity. The i.v. injection of autoclaved spher—
`ules of markedly reduced immunogenieity still
`suppressed immunity development in mice vac-
`cinated i.m. with formalinized spherules (Table
`VI).
`Formalinized endospores, somewhat
`
`less im-
`
`munogenic than formalinized spherules (10, 13)
`but more immunogenic than heated spherules
`(Table VI), also interfered with immunity devel—
`opment when given i.v. (Table VII, Exp. 1)
`to
`either spherule— or endospore—vaccinated (i.m.)
`mice. Correspondingly,
`l.V. administered spher-
`ules had a similar effect on endospore—vaccinated
`mice. Both morphologic phases showed suppres-
`sive activity by the intraperitoneal route (Table
`VII, Exp. 2), but this was less pronounced than
`that induced i.v. Since the spherules ranged from
`15 to 20 H in diameter and endospores from 1 to
`3 1.1, suppressed immunity induced by either route
`apparently was not attributable to the large size
`of injected spherules. This consideration is noted
`
`
`
`
`
`9103‘61requieideg110159113Aqxfiiomunumuf'mm/[duquioripepeoplmoq
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2130 p. 5
`
`

`

`1966]
`
`IMIVIUNOLOGIC IMPAIRMENT T0 0. IMMITIS
`
`301
`
`TABLE VII
`
`Influence of spherules and endospores given intravenously (in) or intraperitaneally (i.p.) on immunity
`to Coccidioides immitis induced intramuscularly (i.m.)
`% Mortality“ (30 Days Postchallenge)
`
`Exp.
`Treatment
`Challenging dose (no. arthrospores):
`30
`60
`120
`600
`1200
`
`
`1
`
`50
`
`None
`2.0 mg spherules i.m.
`1.0 mg spherules i.m.
`2.0 mg endospores i.m.
`1.0 mg endospores i.m.
`1.0 mg spherules i.v.
`2.0 mg endospores i.v.
`1.0 mg endospores i.v.
`1.0 mg spherules i.m. plus 1.0 mg spherules i.v.
`1.0 mg spherules i.m. plus 1.0 mg endospores i.v.
`1.0 mg endospores i.m. plus 1.0 mg endospores i.v.
`1.0 mg endospores i.m. plus 1.0 mg spherules i.v.
`78
`None
`10
`0
`1.0 mg spherules i.m.
`86
`0
`1.0 mg endospores i.p.
`30
`20
`1.0 mg spherules i.p.
`90
`60
`1.0 mg spherules i.m. plus 1.0 mg endospores i.v.
`50
`10
`1.0 mg spherules i.m. plus 1.0 mg endospores i.p.
`40
`50
`1.0 mg spherules i.m. plus 1.0 mg spherules i.v.
`
`1.0 mg spherules i.m. plus 1.0 mg spherules i.p. 15 33
`
`
`70
`0
`0
`20
`0
`50
`80
`100
`50
`20
`0
`20
`30
`
`10
`30
`30
`20
`100
`100
`100
`100
`80
`100
`100
`
`
`
` 9103‘61lequleldeg{1015mgAqxfilomunumul'mm/[duq11101}pepeoplmoq
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘1 7 to 13 mice per group; challenged intranasally 30 days after treatment.
`TABLE VIII
`
`Influence on immunity to Coccidioides immitis of formalin-killed Cryptococcus neoformans or
`Saccharomyces cerevisiae given intravenously (75.1).) in mice vaccinated intramuscularly (i.m.)
`with spherules
`% Mortality“ (30 Days Postchallenge)
`
`Challenge dose (no. arthrospores):
`50-60
`90-120
`450—660
`900
`20—30
`2400
`
`Treatment
`
`Exp.
`
`1
`
`90
`
`None
`0.4 mg spherules i.m. days 0, 7, 14
`0.8 mg spherules i.m. as above
`0.4 mg spherules i.v. as above
`0.8 mg spherules i.v. as above
`0.4 mg spherules i.m. plus 0.4 mg spherules i.v. as above
`0.4 mg Spherules i.m. plus 0.4 mg Cryptococcus neo—
`formans i.v. as above
`
`90
`
`78
`0
`10
`47
`8
`60
`0
`
`40
`6,0
`85
`42
`80
`14
`
`40
`70
`92
`67
`90
`36
`
`2
`
`20
`
`50
`
`56
`
`None
`0.4 mg spherules i.m. days 0, 7
`0.4 mg spherules i.m. day 0; 0.4 mg spherules i.v. day 7
`0.4 mg spherules i.m. day 0
`0.4 mg spherules i.m. day 0; 0.4 mg Sacchammyces
`63
`33
`11
`cerevisiae i.v. day 7
`
`0.4 mg Saccharomyces cerevisiae days 0, 7 63 89 75
`
`
`
`0
`20
`No data 78
`10
`40
`
`20
`100
`55
`
`‘1 10 to 15 mice/group (Exp. 1), 6 to 10 mice/group (Exp. 2); animals challenged intranasally 29 to 30
`days after last treatment.
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2130 p. 6
`
`

`

`302
`
`H. B. LEVINE AND YI—CHI M. KONG
`
`[VOL. 97
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9103‘61requieideguoisenfiziqxfiiomunumnf'mawfinquioripepcoplmoq
`
`shown in Table IX, a single dose of vaccine given
`iv. as late as 30 to 35 days after a single i.m. dose,
`but not 49 days later, resulted in poor immunity.
`When the i.V. dose preceded the i.m. dose by at
`least 30 (Exp. 1) or 49 (Exp. 2) days, no marked
`resistance developed. These data indicated that
`spherules given i.V. altered the host’s capacity to
`develop immunity but did not interfere with its
`capacity to express a pre—existing immunity.
`The inference that existing immunity was not
`impaired by i.V.
`treatment with antigen was
`tested further in two ways. First (Table X), mice
`were vaccinated i.m. 2 months earlier with 2.1 mg
`of spherules in three doses and were given 0.2 to
`0.8 mg spherules i.V. 4 days before challenge.
`These animals remained resistant to a challenge
`dose of 1000 arthrospores.
`(In nonvaccinated
`mice, the 4—day interval between treatment by
`various routes and challenge was insufficient to
`demonstrate unequivocal immunity development
`(10) or its suppression.) Secondly (Fig. 1), mice
`vaccinated 100 days earlier were given 0.2 or 0.02
`mg of vaccine either i.V. or i.m. 7 days before chal-
`lenge with 670 arthrospores. In these groups, im-
`
`TABLE X
`Mortalt’ty after challenge with Coccidioides tmmitis
`in spherule-vaccinatecl
`tntramuscularly (i.m.)
`and nonvacclnated mice treated with Spherules
`intravenously (iv)
`
` .
`
`Group
`
`Treatnrzleéilti151462;? before
`
`Dead/
`d'i‘gtsallagi
`challenge“
`
`Prevaccinatedb
`
`None
`0.8 mg spherules i.m.
`0.2 mg spherules i.V.
`0.4 mg spherules i.V.
`0.6 mg spherules i.V.
`0.8 mg spherules i.V.
`
`0/12
`0/13
`0/12
`0/11
`0/9
`0/8
`
`Nonvaccinated
`
`None
`0.4 mg spherules i.m.
`0.2 mg spherules i.V.
`0.4 mg spherules i.V.
`0.8 mg spherules i.V.
`0.4 mg spherules i.m.
`plus
`
`0.4 mg spherules i.V. 6/13
`
`6/12
`2/12
`5/12
`6/12
`4/12
`
`“ Prevaccinated group challenged with 1000
`arthrospores intranasally, nonvaccinated group
`with 100.
`5 Three weekly doses of 0.7 mg spherules intra~
`muscularly; last dose 8 weeks before treatment.
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2130 p. 7
`
`TABLE IX
`
`Influence an immunity to Coccidioides immttis of
`spherules given intravenously (iv) at intervals
`before and after intramuscular
`(i.m.) injection
`
`% Mortality (30 Days Postchallenge)
`Vaccinated
`
`Days
`between
`Exp. Ist and Nonvac-
`D2ndsa cinated lst dosei.m.; lst dose i.m.;
`lst dose i.V.;
`056
`2nd dose i.m. 2nd dose i.V. 2nd dosei.m.
`
`
`80
`
`1 —
`0
`4
`7
`1 1
`15
`20
`30
`
`60
`60
`20
`35
`25
`15
`25
`
`70
`65
`55
`37
`2O
`55
`25
`
`70
`50”
`65
`80
`53
`45
`53
`
`2
`
`100
`
`——
`79
`94
`60
`0
`45
`53
`27
`7
`63
`75
`20
`14
`68
`31
`29
`21
`32
`47
`33
`28
`50
`50
`0
`35
`38
`29
`0
`42
`
`
`
`0 1049 50
`
`“ 0.4 mg (Exp. 1) 01‘ 1.0 mg (Exp. 2); mice chal-
`lenged intranasally with 460 arthrospores at 62
`days after first dose (Exp. 1) or with 700 arthro-
`spores at 77 days after first dose (Exp. 2).
`1' Ten mice only; 13 to 21 mice in all other
`groups.
`
`because we have observed that the i.V. injection
`of 2.0 mg of spherules or more killed some mice,
`possibly by embolism.
`The above relationships between immunity in-
`duction and its suppression by different cellular
`preparations, fractions and growth phases im-
`plicated immunospecific substances as the medi-
`ators of the impaired response. Thus, unrelated
`organisms were examined in spherule-vaccinated
`mice. Previous studies showed that such animals
`
`were unprotected against C'. neoformans (12) and
`Table VIII shows that formalin—killed crypt0«
`cocci given i.V. did not impair specific immunity
`to Coccidioides. Nor did i.v. administered S. cerevi-
`siae influence anticoccidioidal immunity (Table
`VIII).
`The effective time intervals between i.m. and
`i.V. injections for producing a deficient response
`also pointed to immunospecific relationships. As
`
`

`

`1966]
`
`IMMUNOLOGIC IMPAIRMENT TO 0. IMMITIS
`
`303
`
`NONVACCINATED I
`
`VACCINATED1
`
`NO.RECOVEREDFUNGALPARTICLES/LUNG(ALLLOBES)5dayspost
`
`
`
`
`
`
`intranasalchallengewith670arthrospores
`
`fi—l
`
`103
`
`,._. C)N
`
`»_4 C3._.
`
`>—1
`
`CO
`
`TREATMENTS
`
`Figure 1. Coccidioides immitis numbers in the lungs of mice treated with spherules before infection
`1 Vaccinated intramuscularly on days 0, 7 and 14; challenged on day 107.
`2 Intramuscular or intravenous treatment given on day 100.
`
`munity, measured by the capacity of the animals
`to restrict fungal multiplication in the lungs, was
`potentiated, not suppressed. The fungal census
`at 5 days postchallenge showed that the numbers
`of viable organisms per lung were .101~ to 106-fold
`lower in the treated, immunized mice than in im—
`munized mice not receiving the i.v. or i.m. injec-
`tion of spherules. Thus,
`in preimmunized mice,
`the i.v. dose,
`like the i.m. dose, boosted (14:)
`rather than suppressed immunity.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`A detailed comparison of the nature of sup-
`pressed immunity by coccidioidal
`antigen(s)
`with that of numerous nonfungal systems pr0«
`ducing immunologic unresponsiveness
`is not
`feasible because of the complexity of the unpuri—
`fied fungal antigen (s). The spherule wall, the prin—
`cipal source of immunogen (12), is also the major
`cellular fraction mediating suppression of immu-
`nity (Table V). The wall is a chitin—polysaccha—
`ride-protein structure (15—18) that is catabolized
`slowly in vivo (7). As yet, we have not been able
`to extract appreciable soluble immunogenic mate—
`rial from it by physical, chemical and enzymologic
`methods (unpublished). Present evidence suggests
`that the wall encompasses either two or more im-
`
`munogens or a single immunogen having at least
`two groups of determinants. One is heat—stable,
`or,
`in its molecular arrangement,
`is protected
`from the adverse effects of heat and the other is
`labile to a temperature of 60°C (unpublished) or
`higher
`(Table VI). Optimal
`immunity results
`only in animals receiving both.
`If one speculates, however, that the stable ma-
`terial is polysaccharidal and the labile is protein-
`aceous, suppressed immunity in the coccidioidal
`system could encompass either long-lasting or
`transient features or both (19, 20) superimposed.
`Evidence that there is a long—lasting influence is
`presented in Table IX; Experiment 2 shows that
`when i.v. treatment preceded i.m. vaccination by
`49 days,
`immimity development was impaired.
`This feature directs attention to slowly catabo-
`lized moieties as possible mediators of suppressed
`immunity to C. immitis. Relatedly, it may be
`noted that the slow rate of immunity develop-
`ment after vaccination appears to be referable
`also to the slow rate at which spherules and their
`walls are catabolized (7).
`The above relationships and hypotheses are
`not incompatible with the finding (Table VI) that
`immunogenicity was reduced by heat but with-
`out a corresponding reduction in the capacity of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9103‘61requieidegno1sen3Aqxfiioiounumnimnam/[dnq11101}pepcopI/noq
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2130 p. 8
`
`

`

`304
`
`H. B. LEVINE AND YI—CHI M. KONG
`
`[VOL 97
`
`heated spherules to render mice unresponsive. If
`the heat—stable moiety is chemically distinct from
`the heat—labile and is involved exclusively in sup-
`pressed immunity, its influence would not have
`been affected by the heat treatment. Alterna-
`tively,
`if
`the stable component
`is chemically
`similar to the labile but protected against heat
`denaturation, the low dosage requirement for sup-
`pression (120 to 150 pig of intact spherules, Table
`II) could account for unreduced activity. How—
`ever, inasmuch as the preparation was autoclaved
`for 18 hr, it appears that suppression is mediated,
`at least in part, by heat—stable materials distinct
`from the heat—labile components.
`Since heterologous organisms did not impair
`immunity (Table VIII) and immunogenic com—
`ponents of spherules (Table V) did,
`immuno-
`specificity was implicated. In this respect,
`it
`should be noted that the soluble protoplasmic
`fraction of spherules, virtually nonimmunogenic
`except when emulsified in Freund’s adjuvant
`(Table V), also did not suppress immunity. But
`since the dose of
`the soluble fraction in the
`presence of adjuvant was suflficient to immunize,
`its failure to induce or suppress immunity without
`adjuvant could reflect
`the host’s capacity to
`eliminate unbound antigens. Possibly, the adju-
`vant and intact spherules or walls functioned
`similarly to prolong antigenic stimulation. In sup-
`port of this, we have found that surgical removal
`of intramuscular sites at 14 days, or footpad sites
`at 32 days, postvaceination with spherules re-
`sulted in suboptimal
`immunity (7). At
`these
`times, both sites contained spherules, and residual
`immunogen was still demonstrable in footpads at
`35 days.
`Notwithstanding the undefined nature of the
`immunogens as well as the preparations producing
`an impaired immunologic response,
`there are,
`nevertheless, major parallelisms which can be
`drawn between immunity suppression in the
`coccidioidal model and immunologic unrespon-
`siveness (tolerance) in others reviewed recently
`by Smith (21) and Dvorak (8). These pertain to
`immunospecificity,
`the general unsusceptibility
`of preimmunized mice to becoming unresponsive
`(8, 22, 23), the efficacy of the i.v. route (24—26),
`the effectiveness of low doses and the duration of
`unresponsiveness (23). Additionally, as observed
`by others (8), studies in progress show that the
`delayed hypersensitivity reaction to coccidioidin
`in i.m. vaccinated mice (27) is suppressed in those
`also given spherules i.v.
`
`James
`Acknowledgments. The assistance of
`Cobb, Darryl Comstock and Edward Boerke is
`acknowledged gratefully.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`(i.m.) vaccina-
`Subsequent to intramuscular
`tion with killed Coccidioides immitis spherules,
`mice developed strong immunity and survived
`intranasal challenge doses of arthrospores in the
`magnitude of 200 LD50. This was not the case in
`mice vaccinated intravenously (i.v.); a majority
`succumbed to challenge with 5 LD50. Further-
`more, i.m. vaccinated mice also succumbed to the
`latter challenge when small amounts of antigen
`were administered i.v. either concurrently with,
`before, or up to 35 days after the i.m. doses. The
`nature of the deficient response was in general
`accord with that described for immunologic un-
`responsiveness in the adult animal and was read—
`ily demonstrable with 120 [.Lg of killed spherules.
`The i.v. administration of antigen adversely
`affected immunity development, not its expres-
`sion, because the immunity of preimmunized mice
`could not be impaired by the above—noted treat-
`ment. Immunity suppression was produced also
`with spherule walls, the major locus of the im-
`munogens. Similarly, a suppressed response fol—
`lowed the iv.
`injection of endospores in mice
`vaccinated i.m. with either the spherule or the
`endospore phase of the fungus. However, neither
`Saccharomyces cerevisiae nor Cryptococcus neo—
`former/es, given i.v., induced a deficient response
`in spherulevvaccinated mice nor did a weakly im-
`munogenic soluble cellular
`fraction impair
`it
`significantly. The data suggested that suppression
`was mediated by immunospecific substances and
`was not influenced by the size of the structures
`introduced i.v. which varied from 1 to 2 M (endo-
`spores) to 15 to 20 u (spherules).
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Levine, H. 13., Cobb, J. M. and Smith, C. E.,
`Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 22. 436, 1960.
`2. Levine, H. B., Miller, R. L. and Smith, C. E.,
`J. Immun., 89: 242, 1962.
`3. Larson, C. L., Ribi, E., Wicht, W. C., List, R.
`H. and Goode, G., Nature, 198: 1214, 1963.
`4. Abrahams, I. and Gilleran, T. C., J. Immun,
`85: 629, 1961.
`experi—
`Immunogenicity of
`5. Levine, H. B.,
`mental vaccines in systemic mycoses,
`In
`Fungi and Fungous Diseases, Charles C
`Thomas, Springfield, 111., 1962.
`
`
`
`9103‘61ioqureldeguoissufiziqxfiiowuuurunf'W/[duq11101}popnoprmoq
`
`
`
`
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2130 p. 9
`
`

`

`1966]
`
`IMMUNOLOGIC IMPAIRMENT TO 0. IMMITIS
`
`305
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`20.
`21.
`
`22.
`23.
`24.
`25.
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`Blank, F. and Burke, R. 0., Nature (Lond.),
`175: 829, 1954.
`Breslau, A. M., J. Histochem. Cytochem., 3:
`141, 1955.
`Pappagianis, D. and Kobayashi, G. 8., Ann.
`N. Y. Acad. Sci., 89: 109, 1960.
`Stark, 0. K., J. Immun., 74: 130, 1955.
`Campbell, D. H., Blood, 19: 589, 1957.
`Smith, R. T., Immunologic tolerance of non-
`living antigens, In Advances in Immunology,
`Edited by Taliaferro, W. H. and Humphrey,
`J. H., Academic Press, New York, 1961.
`Dresser, D. W., Immunology, 5: 161, 1961.
`Brook, M. 8., J. Immun. 96: 364, 1966.
`Neeper, C. A., J. Immun., 93: 860, 1964.
`Frey, J. R., Geleick, H. and de Week, A.,
`Science, 144: 853, 1964.
`Battisto, J. R. and Miller, J., Proc. Soc. Exp.
`Biol. Med.,111:111, 1962.
`Kong, Y. M., Savage, D. C. and Kong, L. N.
`L., J. Bact., 91: 876, 1966.
`
`. Kong, Y. M., Levine, H. B., Madin, S. H. and
`Smith, C. E., J. Immun., 92: 779, 1964.
`. Levine, H. B. and Kong, Y. M., Sabouraudia,
`4: 164, 1965.
`. Dvorak, H. F., Billote, J. B., McCarthy, J. S.
`and Flax, M. H., J. Immun., 94: 966, 1965.
`. Siskind, G. W. and Paterson, P. Y., J. Immun.,
`.93; 489, 1964.
`Levine, H. B., Kong, Y. M. and Smith, C. E.,
`J. Immun., .94.- 132, 1965.
`Pappagianis, D., Factors Associated with
`Virulence of Coccidioides immitis, Ph. D.
`thesis, Univ. of Calif ., Berkeley, 1955.
`Kong, Y. M., Levine, H. B. and Smith, C. E.,
`Sabouraudia, 2: 131, 1963.
`Levine, H. B., Cobb, J. M. and Smith, C. E.,
`J. Immun., 87’: 218, 1961.
`Kong, Y. M., Savage, D. C. and Levine, H. B.,
`J. Immun., .95: 1048, 1965.
`Tarbet, J. E. and Breslau, A. M., J. Infect.
`Dis., 92: 183, 1953.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`
`
`
`
`9103‘61loquloldog110159113Aqxfilomunumnf'mm/fduq11101}popcoplmoq
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2130 p. 10
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket