throbber
1C1 182,780 antagonizes the effects of estradinl on
`estrous behavior and energy balance in Syrian hamsters
`
`GEORGE N. WADE, Jl BRADLEY POWERS,
`JEFFREY D. BLAUSTEIN, AND DEBORAH, E. GREEN
`Department of Psychologv and Neuroscience and Behunier Program,
`University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massaehusetm 01003
`
`Wade, George N., J. Bradley Powers, Jeffrey I).
`Blaustein, and Deborah E. Green. 101 182,780 antagonizes
`the effects of estradiul an estrous behavior and energy balance
`in Syrian hamsters. Am. J, Physiol. 265 (Regulamzzv Integrative
`Comp. Physinl. 34): R1399-R1403, 1993.-Three experiments
`examined the effects 0f 101 182,780, a steroidal “pure” rarities—
`tmgen that is thought to be active peripherally but mm, in the
`brain when given systemically, on energy balance, estrum: be-
`havinr, and in viva cell nuclear binding of filliestradiol in Syr-
`ian hamsters. Pretreatment with lCl 182,780 reduced in vivo
`uptake 0f [38}estz‘adiol in uterus but not in pmled hypothala-
`mue-preeptie area. mafieetnmized Syrian hamsters were
`treated with estradiol benzoate (BB, 5 ngg'day}, ICI 182380 (250
`gig/day}, or hath EB and ICI 182380 for 4 wk. Estradiel treat-
`ment caused significant decreases in feed intake, body weight
`and fat content, and linear gmwth. Given alune, ICl 182.?80
`had no effect on these measures. When they were given concur-
`rently, ICI 182,780 attenuated the effects of est-radial 0n budy
`weight, growth, and fat cnntent but not on food intake. ‘I‘reat~
`ment. with 101 182,780 significantly diminished estrous behav-
`ior induced with either EB plus progesterone or with EB alune.
`These findings support the hypothesis that, in addition to its;
`actions in the brain, estradiul acts peripherally to modulate
`estmua hehaviur and energy balance.
`body weight; bedy compositiun; uterus; fund intake; estrogen
`receptors
`
`IT IS CLEAR THAT ommm steroids can act directly in
`the brain to affect a wide variety of behaviors and physi—
`ological functione, including social behaviors, regulatory
`behaviurs, and energy balance {2, 4, 21, 23, 26}. For
`example, appropriately placed intracerehral implants 0f
`estradiel facilitate estrous hehavier, decrease feed in-
`take, or stimulate valuntary exercise in ovariectomized
`rats (6. “1.8, 27}; lesions of these neural lnci prevent the
`respective behavioral changes in response to systemic
`estradinl treatment (7. 9, 12).
`In addition to theme central actione, several lines of
`evidence support the hypothesis that estradiul can act
`on nunneural peripheral tissues to affect. behaviors and
`energy balance in rats (22, 23, 26}. The fact that the
`antieetrugen ICI 182,780 attenuates the effects of estra~
`died on energy balance and estrous behavior in mariac-
`tumized rats is cunsistent with the existence of periph—
`eral sites of action (22). TLC-1182380 differs fmm other
`antiestrngens in that it is highly potent peripherally but
`it dose not; appear tn be active in the brain when it is
`administered systemically (22, 28, ‘29).
`The idea that eetradiol acts both centrally and periph«
`erally to affect behaviors and energy balance has not
`been explored in species other than rats. The present
`experiments use ICI 182,780 to investigate this passibil»
`ity in Syrian hamsters, Hamsters are of interent for
`several reasons. First, it is known that estradiul can act
`directly in the brain to facilitate sexual receptivity and
`0363-6119,:‘93 $2.00 Copyright © 1993
`
`affect other social behaviors (21), but the possibility of
`peripheral sites of action has not been tested. Second, it
`has been suggested that eetradiol can act peripherally to
`alter lipid metabolism and energy balance in hamsters
`(3), but the evidence for this notiun is rather indirect.
`Third, hamsters and rate differ in some of their re—
`spouses to antiestmgens. The older noneteroidal antige—
`trogens such as MEIR-25, {II-628, and tamoxifen inhibit
`steroid-induced estrous behavior in bath species {13, 14,
`17, 25). However, for regulation of energy balance these
`compounds are full estrogen agoniete in rats, whereas
`they net as antageniets in hameters (24, 25h Thus the
`newer, steroidal antiestrogens such as ICI 182380 may
`have different effects in rats and hamsters.
`
`METHOI’IS
`
`Animals and Housing
`
`Adult, female Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus; initial
`body wt 90—110 g) of the Lnk:LVG strain were obtained from
`Charleg River Breeding Laburatories (Wilmington, MA). Ham—
`sters were housed in wire—bottom stainless steel cages (17.5 x
`17.5 x 25 cm) and given tap water and Purina Laboratory
`Rndent Chew (no. 5001} ad libitum. Fflfld pellets were placed on
`the cage floor. A 14:10-11 lightvdark cycle was maintained (lights
`in: at 0’300 11}, and room temperature was kept at 22 i 2" C. After
`1 wk of acclimatien t0 the laboratury. animals were nvarieulo—
`mixed via bilateral flank inciniune under pentubarbital sudium
`anesthesia {80 mgeikg; Sigma Chemical, St. Lame, MO}.
`
`Prncednres
`
`In vino binding of PHjestmdiel. Three weeks after mariac-
`tomy, hamsters were given three daily injections uf sesame nil
`in = 6) or 250 ,ug ICI 182,780 in = 6). One hour after the third
`injection, animals were injeeted intraperitoneally with 60 nCi
`[3H]estradiol (Sp act 103 Ci/mmnl, New England Nuclear, Bos-
`mu, MA)‘ One hour after injection of [aHleEtradioL hamsters
`were anesthetized with penmbarbital sodium (50 mg); a blood
`sample was taken via cardiac puncture with a heparinized sy-
`ringe and then centrifuged. Hamsters were then perfused with
`cnld saline {0.15 M). The hypnthalamus-preuptic area and
`uterus were rapidly dissented. Tissues were humugenized, and a
`cell nuclear fraction was purified by a modification (8) of the
`method of Zigmond and McEwen {30). Radioactivity was ex
`treated from the purified cell nuclei with 3 X 4 ml teiuene—based
`scintillation fluid. A lOO-ul aliquot 0f plasma was transferred to
`a ecintillatinn vial containing 12 ml (if scintillatiun fluid and
`shaken tignruuely. Radioactivity was enunted at an efficiency of
`~45%, and ceunts were carrected for quenching by aummatic
`external standardization. Protein in cell nuclear samples was
`precipitated with ethanol. dissolved in 0.3 N KOH, and esti—
`mated by the method of Bradford (5). Tissue cell nuclear cun—
`centratinns of radioactivity are expressed as tissue tn plasma
`retina (La, disintegratiune per minute per milligram tissue pro-
`tein divided by dieintegrations per minute per micmliter blnud
`plasma).
`the American Physiological Society
`
`R1399
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2109 p. 1
`InnoPharma Licensing LLC V. AstraZeneca AB IPR2017-00904
`Fresenius-Kabi USA LLC V. AstraZeneca AB IPR2017-01910
`
`

`

`R1400
`
`ANTIESTRDGEN EFFECTS IN HAMSTERS
`
`Uterus
`
`Brain
`
`8
`
`4
`
`2
`
`400
`
`g
`U“)
`
`‘3:
`o3) 200
`
`100
`
`3g
`
`lCl
`Oil
`lCI
`Oil
`Fig. 1. Effects of ICI 182,780 (ICI) on in vivo uptake of [3H]estradiol by
`cell nuclei in uterus and hypothalamus-preoptic area in ovariectomized
`hamsters. Animals were treated with sesame oil vehicle (0.1 ml) or ICI
`(250 pg) 48, 24, and 1 h before injection of [3H]estrsdiol. Data are
`expressed as tissue to plasma ratios, that is, disintegrations per minute
`per milligram cell nuclear protein divided by disintegrations per minute
`per microliter plasma. * P <: 0.05 vs oil-treated group.
`
`Food intake (gfday)
`
`‘x
`
`n l
`l A
`
`_,
`Kraft}:
`‘-\\\5“‘°"—_8:30*—:
`
`Cli
`($5210
`
`41
`
`I
`
`l
`
`|
`
`Energy balance. Three weeks after ovariectomy, baseline food
`intake (pouching and spillage accounted for) and body Weight
`were measured to the nearest 0.1 g. After 1 wk of data collection,
`animals were divided into four groups matched for baseline food
`intake and body weight. The groups were given daily subcuta-
`neous injections of 0.1 ml sesame oil vehicle containing 2.5%
`ethanol (n = 11), 5 pg estradiol benzoate (EB, n = 10), 250 ,ug
`101181780 (n. = 11), or 5 pg EB plus 250 [1g ICI 182,780 in =
`10) for 4 wk. Body weight and food intake were measured twice
`a week. On the first and last. days of injections, hamsters were
`anesthetized with pentobarhital sodium (80 mgf'kg body wt),
`and naso-anal length was measured to the nearest millimeter
`with calipers while the animais were stretched with a constant
`IOU-g weight (24). The difference between the two lengths is an
`index of linear growth during hormone treatment.
`At the end of the experiment all animals were killed with an
`overdose of pentobarbital sodium (50 mg). Parametrial and ret-
`roperitoneal fat pads and uteri were removed and weighed. Evia—
`cerated carcasses were dried to a constant weight at 70° C, and
`carcass lipid was estimated from carcass water content. In ham-
`sters, percent carcass water and percent carcass lipid are highly
`correlated (r = 0.98; %lipid = —1.3‘2 X %water + 96.54; n = 289;
`Wade, unpublished data). Fat-free dry weight was calculated as
`the total eviscerated carcass weight less water and estimated
`lipid content.
`Estrous behavior. The animals that were treated with EB,
`1C1182,780, or EB plus ICI 182,780 (above) were tested for
`estrous behavior twice, once with and once without progeste-
`rone treatment. On the 3rd day of estrogen and/or antiestrogen
`treatment, all animals were given a subcutaneous injection of
`200 pg progesterone in 0.1 ml sesame oil at 0900 h and tested for
`estrous behavior 5 to 6 h later. The second test, without pro-
`gesterone, took place on the 23rd day of estrogen and/or anti-
`estrogen treatment. For both tests, females were adapted to a
`small Plexiglas arena (30 X 36 X 30 cm) for 5 min. Sexual
`receptivity tests were begun by introducing a sexually active
`male to the arena. In addition, the female’s flanks and perigenir
`tal region were continuously stimulated using an eyelid brush.
`Tests lasted for 180 s; the latency to display lordosis and the
`total time that the lordosis posture was maintained were re-
`corded. Tests were conducted 6—8 h after lights—on.
`
`Data A nalyses
`
`20
`
`Body weight change (9)
`
`Data were analyzed by t tests and by one- or two -way analyses
`of variance followed by NewmansKeuls post hoc tests where
`appropriate. Differences were considered statistically signifi»
`cant when P < 0.05 for two tails. Data are expressed as means
`t SE.
`
`Days oflreoimenl
`Fig. 2. Body weight gain and food intake of ovariectorniaed hamsters
`treated with sesame- oil vehicle (0.1 ml), estradiol benzoate (EB, 5 pg]
`day), ICI (250 rig/day), or EB plus ICI for 4 wk. (Initial mean group body
`weights 134271359 3,.)
`
`RESULTS
`
`In Vivo Binding of [3HjEstradiol
`Pretreatment with ICI 182,780 significantly reduced in
`vivo cell nuclear binding of [3H]estradiol in uterus but
`not in pooled hypothalamus-preoptic area (Fig. 1), simi-
`lar to findings with rats (22). However, uterine [3H]-
`estradiol binding was reduced by only ~50% in hamsters
`compared with ~90% in rats (22).
`
`Energy Balance
`EB treatment significantly reduced food intake and
`body weight gain (Fig. 2). ICI 182,780, given alone, had
`no effect on body weight, but it significantly attenuated
`the weight—reducing actions of EB. Given alone or in
`combination with EB, ICI 182,780 had no effect on food
`intake (Fig. 2).
`
`Treatment with EB caused significant reductions in
`carcass water and lipid but not in fat-free dry weight (Fig.
`3). Once again, ICI 182,780 alone had no effect, but it
`antagonized the effects of EB on carcass lipid content.
`The changes in body fat content were reflected in the
`weights of individual fat pads (Fig. 4). EB also caused a
`significant decrease in linear growth (change in nasoanal
`length) that was prevented by concurrent treatment with
`ICI 182,780 (Fig. 4). Administration of ICI 182,780 alone
`did not affect growth.
`EB treatment caused a significant increase in uterine
`weight. As in other species (22, 28, 29), 1C1 182.780 had
`no uterotrophic effect, and at this dose, the entiestrogen
`partially antagonized the effect of EB on uterine weight
`(Fig. 4).
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2109 p. 2
`
`

`

`Carcass water (9)
`
`Carcass lipid (g)
`
`Fer-free dry wt. lg)
`
`Parametriol WAT (g)
`
`Retroperit. WAT (g)
`
`ANTIESTROGEN EFFECTS IN HAMSTERS
`
`R1401
`
`1.00
`
`.75
`
`.50 .25
`
`Oil
`
`EB
`
`ICI
`
`EEH»
`ICI
`
`Oil
`
`EB
`
`lCI EB+
`ICI
`
`Growth (mm)
`
`Uterus (g!
`
`
`
`Oil
`
`re
`
`10 EB+
`lCl
`
`o
`
`o
`
`a
`
`b
`
`B
`
`o 4
`
`2
`
`"on to to! as:
`lCI
`
`Fig. 4. Terminal weights of parametrial and retroperitoneal white adi—
`pose tissue (WAT) and uterus and change in naso—ana] length (growth)
`of ovariectomized hamsters treated with sesame oil vehicle (0.1 ml), EB
`(5 gig/day), ICI (250 rig/day), or EB plus ICI for 4 wk. Ears with differ-
`ent letters are significantly different (P <3. 0.05).
`
`Estradiol-I-progesterone:
`Latency (sec)
`Duration (sec)
`
`till
`
`EB+
`ICI
`
`EB
`
`EB+
`ICI
`
`Estradiol alone:
`
`Latency [sec]
`
`Duration (sec)
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`it
`
`120
`
`so
`
`40
`
`EB
`
`EB
`
`EB+
`EB+
`ICI
`ICI
`Fig. 5. Effects of ICI on estrous behavior in ovariectomized hamsters.
`Top: animals were injected with BB [5 pg) or EB plus ICI (250 cg) for
`2 days followed by 200 pg progesterone on 3rd day, 4—5 h before testing.
`Bottom: animals were injected with EB or EB plus ICI for 23 days before
`testing. * P < 0.05 vs. EB-treated group.
`
`intake and that no peripheral actions are required. How-
`ever, we cannot exclude the possibility that a higher dose
`of ICI 182,780 than that used in this study would be
`sufficient to antagonize the effects of estradiol on food
`intake in hamsters.
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2109 p. 3
`
`‘1
`
`b
`
`is
`
`12
`6
`
`24 c
`
`Oil
`
`EB lCl EB+
`ICI
`
`Oll
`
`EB
`
`ICI EB+
`|C|
`
`Oil
`
`EB ICI EB+
`IC‘.
`
`Fig. 3. Terminal carcass composition of ovariectomized hamsters
`treated with sesame oil vehicle [0.1 ml), EB (5 pig/day), ICI (250 ug/
`day), or EB plus ICI for 4 wk. Bars with different letters are signifi-
`cantly different (P < 0.05).
`
`Estrous Behavior
`
`Treatment with ICI 182,780. given alone or in combi-
`nation with progesterone, did not induce any signs of
`sexual receptivity in ovariectomized hamsters (data not
`shown). However, ICI 182,780 did inhibit estrous behav-
`ior induced by treatment with either EB plus progeste—
`rone or EB alone. ICI 182.780 significantly increased
`lordosis latency and decreased lordosis duration in ham-
`sters treated with EB for 2 days followed by progesterone
`(Fig. 5, top). In hamsters given EB for 23 days, concur-
`rent
`treatment with ICI 182,780
`significantly de-
`creased lordosis duration but did not affect latency (Fig.
`5, bottom).
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`These findings confirm a number of the unusual prop-
`erties of ICI 182,780. As in other species (22, 28, 29),
`ICI 182,780 appears to be a pure antiestrogen in Syrian
`hamsters. It at least partially antagonized the actions of
`estradiol on body weight, body composition,
`linear
`growth, estrous behavior, and uterine weight without
`having any agonistic (estrogenic) effects when given by
`itself to ovariectomized animals. The present results also
`support the conjecture that ICI 182,780 does not act di—
`rectly in the brain. As in rats (22), pretreatment with
`radioinert ICI 182,780, significantly reduced in vivo cell
`nuclear binding of [3H]estradiol in uterus but not in
`pooled hypothalamus-preoptic area. Taken together,
`these two findings suggest that ICI 182,780 can be used as
`an experimental tool to dissociate central and peripheral
`actions of estradiol.
`The fact that ICI 182,780 attenuated the effects of es—
`tradiol treatment on body weight and fat content is con-
`sistent with our assertion (23, 26) that ovarian steroids
`act both centrally and peripherally to affect energy bal~
`ance. Several lines of work support the idea of distinct
`central and peripheral sites of estrogen action on energy
`balance in rats (22, 23, 26), but this appears to be the first
`evidence for this possibility in hamsters.
`The fact that treatment with ICI 182,780 completely
`blocked the effects of estradiol on linear growth (change
`in naso-anal length) may indicate that estrogen effects on
`growth are predominantly due to nonneural actions of the
`steroid in hamsters. On the other hand, treatment with
`ICI 182,780 did not attenuate the suppressive effects of
`estradiol on food intake in hamsters. Thus it is likely that
`estradiol action in the brain is sufficient to decrease food
`
`

`

`R1402
`
`ANTIESTROGEN EFFECTS IN HAMSTERS
`
`These findings in hamsters contrast with those in rats
`where ICI 182,780 treatment actually potentiated the es-
`tradiol-induced decreases in food intake (22). We sug-
`gested that in rats this action of ICI 182,780 could be due
`to the induction of a “pharmacological hysterectomy,”
`because surgical hysterectomy enhances behavioral re-
`sponsiveness to estradiol in this species (1, 20). In con~
`trast, surgical hysterectomy does not potentiate estradiol-
`induced sexual receptivity in hamsters (19),
`just as
`ICI 182,780 treatment does not potentiate the estradiol—
`induced decrease in food intake. Therefore, the difference
`between rats and hamsters in the effects of ICI 182,780
`on food intake may be a reflection of the species differ-
`ence in the actions of the uterus on behavioral respon-
`siveness to estradiol.
`
`ICI 182,780 attenuated the induction of estrous behav-
`ior, either by sequential treatments with estradiol and
`progesterone or by prolonged (23 days) treatment with
`estradiol alone. Thus, in hamsters, as in rats (22), estra-
`diol appears to act peripherally, as well as centrally'(2, 4,
`21), to facilitate estrous behavior. We have suggested
`that in rats, ICI 182,780 could attenuate sexual receptiv-
`ity at least in part by blocking the effects of estradiol
`on peripheral sensory fields that are important for es—
`trous responsiveness (10, 11). Similar work examining
`the effects of ovarian steroids on peripheral sensory
`fields has not yet been done in hamsters, but it is known
`that
`somatosensory cues
`from the perineal
`region
`play a significant role in hamster copulatory behavior
`(15, 16}.
`are possible,
`comparisons
`that
`extent
`To the
`ICI 182,780 may be more effective at inhibiting estrous
`behavior in hamsters than in rats (22). If this is in fact
`the case, the uterus might play a role in this species dif-
`ference, because surgical hysterectomy potentiates the
`effects of estradiol on sexual receptivity in rats but not
`in hamsters (1, 19). Thus in rats ICI 182780 could con-
`currently inhibit estrous behavior
`(perhaps by inhi—
`biting an action of estradiol on peripheral sensory
`fields) and facilitate estrous behavior (via a pharmaco-
`logical hysterectomy facilitating estrogen action in
`the brain). According to this hypothesis, only the inhibi—
`tory actions would be evident in hamsters.
`It appears as though the dose of ICI 182,780 we have
`used (250 rig/day) is more effective in reducing uterine
`weight and in vivo cell nuclear uptake of {3H]estradiol in
`rats than in hamsters (22). At this time it is not clear
`whether this effect is due to 1) species differences in
`ICI 182.780 absorption, delivery, or clearance; 2) dif—
`ferences in affinity for estrogen receptors; or 3) some
`other factor(s). Differences in the EB doses that were
`used (2 ug in rats, 5 ng in hamsters) could explain the
`differences in the inhibition of uterine weight but can-
`not account for the differences in inhibition of [3H]es-
`tradiol binding. Whatever the basis for this species dif—
`ference in ICI 182,780 potency in the uterus, the impor-
`tant point remains that
`in both rats and hamsters
`treatment with ICI 182,780 attenuates the effects of es—
`tradiol on energy balance and on estrous behavior with—
`out interfering with neural estrogen binding. Therefore,
`these results support the hypothesis that estradiol affects
`
`energy balance and estrous behavior via both neural and
`nonneural sites of action.
`
`We are grateful to Jay Alexander, Robin Lempicki, and Joanne Tur-
`cotte for their expert technical assistance and to Alan E. Wakeling of
`Zeneca (ICI) Pharmaceuticals for the gift of ICI 182,780.
`This work was supported by Research Grants N8-10873. DK-32976,
`and NS-19327, by Research Scientist Award MH-00321, and by Re-
`search Scientist Development Award NIH-00885 from the National In-
`stitutes of Health.
`Address reprint requests to G. N. “fade, Dept. of Psychology, Univ.
`of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003.
`Received 8 March 1993; accepted in final form 5 May 1993.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Ahdieh, H. B., and G. N. Wade. Effects of hysterectomy on
`sexual receptivity, food intake, running wheel activity, and hypo-
`thalamic estrogen and progestin receptors in rats. J. Comp.
`Physiol. Psychoi. 96: 888—892, 1982.
`2. Barfield, R. J., B. S. Rubin, J. H. Glaser, and P. G. Davis.
`Sites of action of ovarian hormones in the regulation of oestrous
`responsiveness in rats. In: Hormones and Behaviour in Higher
`Vertebrates. edited by J. Balthazart. E. Prove. and R. Gilles. Ber-
`lin; Springerr‘v'erlag, 1983, p. 2717.
`3. Bhatia, A. J ., and G. N. Wade. Effects of pregnancy and ovar-
`ian steroids on fatty acid synthesis and uptake in Syrian hamsters.
`Am. J. Physiol. 2260 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiof. 29):
`R153—R158, 1991.
`4. Blaustein, J. 1)., and D. H. Olster. Gonadal steroid hormone
`receptors and social behaviors. In: Aduances in Comparative and
`Environmental Physiology, edited by J. Balthazart. Berlin:
`Springer-Verlag, 1989, vol. 3, p. 31—104.
`5. Bradford, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for quantifica-
`tion of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of
`protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72: 248—254, 1976.
`6. Butera, P. 0., and R. J. Beikirch. Central
`implants of
`diluted estradiol: independent effects on ingestive and reproduc-
`tive behaviors of ovariectomized rats. Brain Res. 491: 268,273,
`1989.
`
`7. Butera, P. C., I}. M. Willard, and S. A. Raymond. Effects of
`PVN lesions on the responsiveness of female rats to estradiol.
`Brain Res. 576: 304—310, 1992.
`8. Gentry, R. T., G. N. Wade, and E. J. Roy. Individual differ-
`ences in estradiol-induced behaviors and in neural 3H-estradiol
`uptake in rats. Physiot. Behou. 17: 195—200, 1976.
`9. Kennedy, G. C. Hypothslamic control of the endocrine and be-
`havioural changes associated with oestrus in the rat. J. Physiol.
`Land. 172: 383—392, 1964.
`10. Komisaruk, B. R., N. T. Adler, and J. Hutchinson. Genital
`sensory field: enlargement by estrogen treatment in female rats.
`Science Wash. DC 178: 129571298, 1972.
`11. Row, L.-M., and D. W. Pfaff. Effects of estrogen treat-
`ment on the size of receptive field and response threshold of
`pudenda] nerve in the female rat. Neuroendocrinulogy 13: 299—313.
`1973.
`
`12. Law, T., and W. Meagher. Hypothalamic lesions and sexual
`behavior in the female rat. Science Wash. DC 128: 16264627,
`1958.
`
`13. Moisel, R. L., G. P. Dohanich, B. S. McEwen, and D. W.
`Pfaff. Antagonism of sexual behavior in female rats by ventro-
`medial hypothalsmic implants of antiestmgen. Neuroendocrinoi-
`ogy 45: 2017207, 1987.
`14. Morin, L. P.. J. B. Powers. and M. White. Effects of the
`antiestrogens, MER-25 and (ll-628, on rat and hamster lurdosis.
`Horm. Behau. 7: 283v291, 1976.
`15. Noble, R. G. The sexual responses of the female hamster: a
`descriptive analysis. Physiol. Behav. 23: 1001—1004, 1979.
`16. Noble, R. G. Sex responses of the female hamster: effects on male
`performance. Physiol. Behav. 24: 237—242, 1980.
`17. Roy, E. J., and G. N. Wade. Binding of [3H]estradiol by brain
`cell nuclei and female rat sexual behavior: inhibition by antiestro
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2109 p. 4
`
`

`

`ANTIESTROGEN EFFECTS IN HAMSTERS
`
`R1403
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
`gens. Brain Res. 126: 73—87, 1977.
`Rubin, B. S. , and R. J. Barfield. Priming of estrous respon-
`siveness by implants of 17,8-estradiol in the ventromedial hypo-
`thalamic nucleua of rats. Endocrinology 106: 5044,09, 1980.
`Siegel, H. 1-, P. Cohen, and J. S. Rosenblatt. The effect of
`hysterectomy on hormone-induced lordosis behavior in hamsters.
`Physiol. Belltw. 23: 8517853, 1979.
`Siegel, H. I., and J. S. Rosenblatt. Estrogen-induced maternal
`behaviors in ovariectomieed—hysterectomized virgin rats. Physiol.
`Behav. 11: 273378, 1978.
`be—
`regulation of sociosexual
`Talmhashi, L. K. Hormonal
`havior in female mammals. Neurosci. Biobehcw. Rev. 14: 403—413.
`1990.
`Wade, G. N., J. D. Bloustein, J. M. Gray, and J. M.
`Meredith. ICI 182,180: a pure antieetrogen that affects behaviors
`and energy balance in rats without acting in the brain. Am. J.
`Physiol. 255 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physml. 34): R3392—
`31398, 1993.
`Wade, G. N., and J. M. Gray. Gonadal effects on food intake
`and adiposity: a metabolic hypothesis. Physiol. Bakery. 22: 583-
`593, 1979.
`Wade, G. N., and H. W. Heller. Tamoxifen mimics the effects
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
`‘29.
`
`30.
`
`of estradiol on food intake, body weight, and body composition in
`rats. Am. J. Physiol. 264 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol.
`33): R12197R1223, 1993.
`Wade, G. N., and J. B. Powers. Tamoxifen antagonizes the
`effects of estradiol on energy balance and estrous behavior in
`Syrian hamsters. Am. J. Physiol. 265 (Regulatmy Integrative
`Comp. Physsoi. 34); R559—R562. 1993.
`Wade, G. N., and J. E. Schneider. Metabolic fuels and repro~
`duction in female mammals. Neurosci. Biobelwv. Rev. 16: 235 272,
`1992.
`Wade, G. N., and I. Zucker. Modulation of food intake and
`locomotor activity in female rats by diencephalic hormone im—
`plants. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 72: 328—336, 1970.
`Wakeling, A. E., and J. Bowler. ICI-182,780, a new antioes-
`trogen with clinical potential. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol, Biol. 43:
`173—177, 1992.
`Wakeling, A. E., M. Dukes, and J. Bowler. A potent specific
`pure antiestrogen with clinical potential. Cancer Res. 51: 3867—
`3873, 1991.
`Zigmond, R. E., and B. S. McEwen. Selective retention of
`oestradiol by cell nuclei in specific brain regions of the ovariecto—
`mized rat. J. Neumchem. 17: 8897899, 1970.
`
`
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2109 p. 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket