throbber

`
`map/ea! Na; mammals):
`ibposizim against E? Palm: {{3; 93 (1136.53 32563138}
`Patmtea. Mimi’me M3
`{hmitim by. (Jemima Richmr Ltd.
`{3m Rafi: £62363 Ema-1:2?
`
`WSSMS 3c PARYNER
`WWW * kaé
`swam-{gm 4%
`8'16???) MUNQHEN
`
`203
`
`Antiuterotrophic efiects of the pure antioestrogen ICI
`182,780 in adult female mankeys (Macaw nemestrina):
`quantitative magnetic resonance imaging
`
`£9510
`
`Mfi Dukes, J. C. Waterfall and A. E. Wakefing
`
`Cancer Research Departmem, 2ENBCA Pharmaccmicais, Meresidc, Aldcrley Faric, Mamlesfield,
`Cheshire gamma, UK.
`
`Rewsw MANUSCNFI’ RECEIVED 15 ngruary 1993
`
`
`AfiSTRACT
`
`size 01‘ the myometrinm deareaseé signifimntiy. by
`The antiutemtmphic cfiicacy of the pure antioestm—
`15% from cady In mid cycle and then rawwmi ta
`an K21 £82389 has been demonstrated pmiausly by
`( Egnetic resonance imaging (MR!) in ovariectomized
`near its initia! volume in the Kate cycle. Treatment
`with ICI 182380 beginning in the: aaxly part of the
`aestmgen»lreated monkeys
`(Macaw nemsxirina).
`menstruai cycie prevented the growth of the uterus.
`Fufiher charafiterizatim of ihe effects 0f {CI 182388
`in intact adult female monkeys with nomai menstrual
`The magnitude and duratinn at” the response was
`fiependent on whether a: not avalatian occurred
`cycles was underiaken to pmfide an indicatian 0f its
`during treatmcnt with It?! 382.1380; In animals rm»
`palatial aciions in prcmcnupausa} wumcn. Changes
`dared anevulamry, growth of the endametrium was
`in the volume of uterine tifisues wen: measured by
`blocked compietely by ICI 182380 and the wfiume of
`MR! in early, mid and law cycic. The wmme of the
`the tissue daclincd below tha: prcscm at th: siart 3f
`menu varied up to fivefold between individual
`the manstmai cycie. Antiuterozmphic eflficacy was
`moukcys but
`serial ubsawatinns
`in
`individuals
`signifiwmiy less in monkey whiuh mule:th during
`pmvidad suifinim: premisian ta afiaw accurate: asses?»
`treatment with iCI 182.?8fl. Th»: volume: caf mama
`ments to 33: made ef changes in tha endometrium and
`mairium was reduceé subsiantiafiy by amicastmgw
`mynmctrium timing the marge 3f the menstmai cycle
`treatmant, and the difierence in response between
`and follawing ICI 182,786 adminiatration, In cam‘
`ovulatory and anewiatozy mankeys was less marked
`parison with its initial size in unnamed mankeys, the
`than that of the endometrium.
`endwmetrium increased in valume by 60% and 125%
`3m:sz {af Enfiacrfnaiagy (i993) 3381 2&3—26‘?
`in the mid and late a}:ch respectively. In cont ran, the:
`
`KmTRGflUCTIGN
`
`ICI 182380 is a preteen: spacific pure: aminestmgen
`which may pm“: superiar m canvcntianai partial
`aganist anthestmgens in the ire-airman: of breast
`Cancer {Wakefing e: 31‘ 1993). Preview studies
`avail-431w the antisestmgenic potency and effiaacy of
`ICI 182386 in avariectomized Gestmgcmtreated
`monkeys (Macaw aemesfrina) by magnetic resonance
`imaging (MRI) of the uterus (Watertan at a}. 19:91;
`flukes e: 0!. 1992). A daily (Ease of {ii-1mg ICI
`ISRJSBEkg sample:er biwked the utermmphic
`actian Gf magenous aestradinE-«l’f3. Singie intra«
`museum:
`injectians
`at" a
`innyacting ail—based
`farmuiation of
`ICI
`182333 in wariectomézed
`menke'ys were 3150 shuwn t0 inhibit oastmgcn acticm
`in a dosevdepcndent sustaincd manner (Dukes er as}.
`
`1992}. MRI has been used to abscrve the 1::me
`during the Hanna) menstrual cyan: in women (mamas
`e: a!" 1986; Raynor er 4?. 1986; McCarthy er a}. 1986;
`Wiczyk e: :21. 3988; Earmfi er al‘ 1991) and the
`response :0 exogenous endocrine agents {Demas
`22 a}. $86; McCarthy a: £211 1936; Andreyko a; :23.
`1988; zawin e: :25. 1996), MRI has aim been 1133:}
`quantitatively {a measure the: changes in madame af
`ihe endometrium anti myometrium during the normal
`manslruai cycle in M. nemastrim (Watermn é’f a1.
`1992} The MRI studies repented here were performed
`is waluata {has antiutcmtwphic effects a? It?! 132.7780
`in admit {emaie monkeys with normal menstrual
`cycles{ Such gtudies are rciwant
`to the mammal
`appiicaiien of ICE £82333! in the treatment of bath
`malignant and benign oestmgen—responsive (£53me
`in pre- and perimmopausal women.
`
`mea! {3}“ Eadem’asfagy {I993} 138., 2036253
`m22w¥37§5f93ffl133~3283 “2.01333
`
`(E 29193 Jamaal 9f Emiocrinelngy L16
`
`Printed in Gram 3mm
`
`InnoPharma Exhibit 10570001
`
`

`

`1,.
`
`204 M. 1mm and others
`
`
`Efi‘eem ef 3C? 1’82, me in grief: memtmaffrrg menkefi
`
`MATERIALfi AN!) METBGDS
`
`Mimi handfieg are} matinee: Mules
`
`Mamie femaie pigtail monkeys (M. eemerrreze) of
`see kg body weight with regular menstrual eyeiee
`were used. The normai menstrual cycle in this. species.
`is 29-32 days in length; menstrual bieeding usuaily
`lasts 3—4 days. Daily vaginal swabs were taker: to
`detect the were: of meme-eel bleeding and the first
`day ef menstruation was riceignared day l ef the
`eyeie. Where required, bleed. samples {2 ml) fer eubw
`sequent humane anelyees were eelieeted daily. MRI
`examinatiens tee}: place before the animals received
`{heir returning feeri. in order m minimize artef‘aeteel
`neiee associated with get meiien. Anaesthesia was
`induced will: 8*? mg ketamineikg (Verifier: Parke
`
`Dares, Pentypoel. Sweet, LLK.) and riaintained
`with haleihene (Fluethene;
`1C1 Pharmaceuticals,
`Maeelesfielci, Cheshire, UK.)
`The timing 0!“ MR1, drug treatment and bleed
`sampling was echednled by reference to the firei tier
`of menstruatien. To erevide a baseline with which to
`compare the effects ef rimg treatment,
`three MRI
`measuremems ef‘ the uterus were made during each of
`two cycles in ten unireeteri menkeye (Warmer: er e3.
`19%). Images were recorded in early {days 2—6}. mid
`(days 12-18) and late (days 21.45} cycle am! sched-
`uled by reference to the elifi'erenoes in cycle length in
`individueis.
`images were reeerded at similar time-e
`paints in menkeys treated with R31 £82331 beginning
`early in the menstrual cyele (days 2—5). Tim ferme—
`laliens {if ICI 132383 were used: a. shortvaeting
`prapylene glycol-based evolution (F 1) administered
`once daily im. for 25 days at a dense ef {H (exS) or
`02 mg (a: 5) EC! ISQJflGikg, and a lengeaeting easier
`eii~baeed soiutiee (F2) given as a single im. inieetiee
`at” 2'5 (11:26) ar emg (anti) {CI L8238flflcg.
`
`Quantitative Mill
`
`The metth Fer measurement 0f endemeirium anti
`
`myemezriam eeiume is described in detail elsewhere
`{Water'th er 5;}. 1991, 1992.; Dukes er mi.
`l992).
`Eriefiy,
`the study empleyed a. Bieepee 40012.3
`instrument {Oxford Reeeareh Systems, Cerentry,
`Warwiekshire, UJC-) m reeerd a series (if eblique
`images (if the uterus. Fer eaeh animal on each
`oceasien, sagittal sighting images were used re deter»
`mine the: spatial {rev-ordinates 0f the uterine mrvix and
`famine. From these ee~erdinaies, MR! parameters
`were calculmed to allaw the acquisilian (if eight
`eemigeeue eeiiqne eliee images, the thickness, peeie
`tier: and Grieritatian {if which were famed m depend
`on the eeeter cementing the fundus and cervix. Thie
`pracedure allowe repmdueihie presematien {if the
`
`Jeureei e! Endeert‘neleg}? (29%) 133, 3333439
`
`uterus, independent ef its Sixth location and edema.
`tier! in the pelvis {Dukes e: mi. 19%; Waterten er :3}.
`1992}. Image matrices were 256 X 256 giving an in
`plane reseiuiiae ef 6-6 mm. The appearance el‘ the
`images (see the Flate} results from the choice eat” MR}
`parameters, in particular the magnetic: field strength
`of 2‘35 tesla, the eehe time ef 501115. the repetition
`time 3f 3 s. and euppressien {if {he signai fmm fat.
`To allew comparisons between imagee acquired on
`different making, iissue eelumes were measureni
`rather than enéometrium heighi er area, since the
`former avoids arlefaete fmrm repesitienieg errors
`or shape change-e. Endomeirium and myemetrium
`velumes were obtained by pixel wanting in the
`oblique images eeing the irregular regiemeflimereet
`facilities within the pregrems uxemr er DISNMR
`(Bruker Analytieehe Meestechnik Gmhfl. Karlsmhe,
`Germany). Only slices more feudal than the internal
`as were included in the analysis. The junction zone
`was includee with the myometrium. Any contribution
`in enciernetrium velume from the lumen was neglected
`since. except during menstruatien, this is irent—y narrow
`and insignificant in mmperisen with {he endenierrium
`(Dukes; e: a}, 1992; Waterien e: :33. 19?2}.
`Altheugh, in principle, the prescription 0f regien»
`ef~interesl can be subjeetive, the method empleyed
`minimizes errors, since the presentation cf the uterus
`was the same at each examination (Watenen er a3.
`1991. 3992; Dukes er e1. V392). Fer each sanitize]r the
`same eesewer analysed eli imagee. Weathers-week ami
`eyelevteeycle coefficients of variericn were as law as
`5% {Weterten er e}. 3992).
`
`Analysis of rewrite
`
`The volumes ef the endemetriem and myemetrium in
`treated and untreated greups were calculated as the
`arithmetic mean (i: 5.2M.) nemalized by reference
`to tissue velumes in individuals at
`the first MRI
`measurement. Differences between greup means were
`tested fer significance by the unpaired Student’s
`:--test.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Uterine volume in the natural menstrual cycle
`
`The velumee ef the endometrium and myemeu‘inm
`were meaeured by MRI in early. mid and late cycle
`in two cycles in each of ten different untreated
`mankeye {Text-fig. 3). The mean interval between
`repeat measurements was 4 menths (range 1-9
`mes-mile}. Tissue winmeg varied widely betwaen indi»
`eiduaie but less so in repeat measurements in the same
`animal Tyeical images reeerded in me maul-my at
`
`InnoPharma Exhibit 1057.0002
`
`

`

`
`
`' M. DUKES and othersEfll’cu oj’ICI l82.780 in adult meant/wring monkey-3 205
`
`
`
`4'0
`
`(“1
`
`3-5
`
`3.0
`2-5
`2'0
`
`\
`
`
`|
`
`I
`'
`
`\
`
`|
`
`w
`
`I
`
`'
`
`Q2—me:
`olume[cm) O
`
`
`
`M O
`
`‘ V
`
`:3 m
`
`mN0‘
`
`N JJ Lil
`
`Ng» on
`
`.. \o
`
`NLo)9.:
`
`N N m
`
`N \D
`
`0'5a
`
`N a:
`
`A.a“ V
`
`'
`
`I
`
`18
`
`[6
`
`l4
`
`I2
`10
`
`[38
`
`226
`
`235
`
`238
`
`233
`19]
`Animalnumbcr
`
`228
`
`2|9
`
`169
`
`217
`
`TEXT‘FIGURE l. (a) Endometrium and (b) myomeuium volumes in untreated
`monkeys during the menstrual cycle. For each of ten animals the bars represent
`(From left) tissue volumes measured by magnctic resonance imaging in two
`separate menstrual cycles, during the early (days 2—5}, mid (days 12-48) and
`lalc (days 21—25) stages of the cycle.
`
`Journal of Endocrinology (1993) 133. 203-209
`
`InnoPharma Exhibit 1057.0003
`
`

`

`206 M. DUK and others
`
`Ejects of [CI 182.780 in adult menstruating monkeys
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Normalizedvolumes(We)
`
`Untreated
`(n = 20)
`
`Pl (0-1)
`01:30
`
`F1 (02)
`(n = 4)
`
`F2 (2-5)
`in = 3)
`
`F2 {4-0)
`01 = 5)
`
`TEXT—FIGURE 2. (a) Endometrium and (b) myometrium volumes in untreated
`and ICI {BAND-treated anov'ulatory monkeys. Tissue volumes at mid and late
`cycle were normalized to those recorded at the beginning of the cycle in each
`individual. From the left, values are means i 5.8M. for untreated controls;
`monkeys receiving once daily injections of 1C] 182,780 (O-l 01' 0'2 mglkg) (Fl)
`for 25 days. beginning on cycle day 3; monkeys receiving a single injection of
`1C] 132.780 (25 or 4 mg/kg) (F2) on day 3.
`
`days 3 (early), 16 (mid) and 24 (late) of the cycle are
`illustrated in the Plate, figs 1—3 and in another case at
`days 2, 16 and 23 in the Plate, figs 7—9. Analysis of the
`data showed that >75% of the variance arises from
`
`Efl'ect of [Cl 182,780 on the uterus
`The effects of [CI 182,780 on the appearance of the
`uterus in MR images is shown in the Plate. Plate, figs
`4—6 and 10—12 illustrate the mid corpus of the uterus
`at early. mid and late cycle, in individuals treated
`with the rapid— (F1) or slow— (F2) release Formulations
`of KS] 182,780 respectively, compared with images
`recorded in control cycles in the same individuals
`(Plate,
`figs 1—3 and 7-9). The dramatic shrinkage
`of the endometrium (central high~signal zone)
`is
`immediately apparent;
`the myomctrial changes are
`less obvious from visual inspection of the images but
`emerge clearly from quantitative image analysis.
`In monkeys treated with [Cl 182,780, the magni-
`tude of changes in the volume of the endomctrium
`and myomctrium was dependent on whether or not
`individual monkeys were rendered anovulatory by the
`treatment. Where serum progesterone concentration
`(not shown) remained below 2 nmolfl in the second
`half of the menstrual cycle. animals were judged to be
`anovulatory; similarly where progesterone exceeded
`this value and remained elevated for at least ll] days,
`ovulation was assumed to have occurred. By this
`criterion, treatment with 0-] or 0-2 mg ICI 132,780fkg
`daily (Fl) blocked ovulation in three or four of the
`
`InnoPharma Exhibit 1057.0004
`
`interanimal variability. Average coefficients of varia—
`tion for volumes measured in difl‘erent cycles were in
`the range l4—19% for the endomctrium and 63—10%
`for the myometrium.
`The
`endometriurn increased
`
`in
`
`the
`
`in
`
`size
`
`follicular phase of the menstrual cycle in 17 of 20
`cycles (mean increase 60%, P<D-001; early vs mid
`cycle volume) and this growth continued in the
`luteal phase in 18 of 20 cycles (mean increase 65%,
`P<0-001; mid vs late cycle volume). Changes in the
`volume of the myometrium were smaller but a
`consistent pattern emerged in which a decrease in
`size was observed in 18 of 20 cycles in the follicular
`phase (mean decrease 16%, P<0'001; early vs mid
`cycle).
`In the luteal phase the volume of the
`myometrium increased in 18 of 20 cycles (mean
`10%. P<0-02; mid vs late cycle volume). The net
`effect of the follicular phase shrinkage and luteal
`phase growth of the myometrium restored mean
`myometrium volume to near that recorded initially
`(94%, P>0~05 compared with early cycle).
`
`Journal of Endocrinology (1993} 138. 203—209
`
`

`

`Eject: of [Cl [82.780 in adult menstruating monkeys
`
`M. DUKES and others
`
`20?
`
`
`
`
`200
`
`A100
`
`g3
`
`3’
`
`Ea E1
`
`0
`
`, E
`
`"5
`E0
`Z
`
`(“100
`
`50
`
`o
`
`Untreated
`
`Fzr4-0)
`1:20-53
`r295;
`Fzrz—s)
`Firs-2]
`rim-1)
`Fl (0-1)
`169
`233
`219
`217
`174
`225
`235
`(a) Endometrium and (b) myometrium volumes in untreated and lCl I82,780-treated ovulatory monkeys,
`TEXT-FIGURE 3.
`Tissue volumes at mid and late cycle. normalized to those recorded at the beginning of the cycle in each individual
`monkey. are compared with mean values (it starts. n=20) for untreated controls. From the left. values are
`means i 5.514. for untreated controls; monkeys receiving once daily injections of [CI 182.780 (0-! or 0-2 mgikg) {F1} for
`25 days beginning on cycle day 3; monkeys receiving a single injection of [CI 182.780 (25 or 4 mg/kg) {F2} on day 3,
`
`five monkeys respectively, in each dose group. Simi-
`larly. ovulation was blocked in three or five of the six
`monkeys receiving a single injection of 2-5 or 4mg
`ICI 182.7801kg (F2). There was a tendency for the
`her-dose groups to include fewer ovulatory cycles
`“in this was not statistically significant with the small
`group sizes employed.
`The mean changes in the volume of the endo-
`metrium and myometrium in [CI 132,780-treated
`animals are presented in Text-figs 2 and 3. Since
`absolute tissue volumes vary widely between indi-
`viduals
`(Text-fig.
`l),
`the effects of 1C] 182,780
`were assessed by normalizing the volume of tissue(s)
`recorded in each animal at
`the mid and late cycle
`observations to those recorded at the beginning of the
`cycle. prior to treatment, and by comparison with
`similarly normalized observations in the untreated
`controls.
`in monkeys rendered anovulatory by lCl
`[82.780 (Text-fig. 2). the normal follicular and luteal
`phase growth of the endometrium was blocked
`completely and tissue volume at mid and late cycle
`was significantly (P<0-001)
`less
`than that before
`treatment began in each of the treatment regimens.
`
`Although shrinkage of the endometrium was most
`apparent during the first half of the cycle {mean
`decrease — 61% compared with +60% control.
`P<0AOOL at mid cycle). blockade of growth was
`sustained throughout (mean — 67% compared with
`+i25"/u control. P<0'00l. at
`late cycle). When the
`occurrence of ovulatiOn was accounted for. no sig-
`nificant differences emerged between the effects of the
`different formulations and doses of ICI 182,780. with
`the exception that
`the 2-5 mg dose (F2) appeared
`slightly less efiective (P<O-05) than the 4-0 mg dose in
`the second half of the cycle The volume of the
`myometrium in [CI 182,780-treated anovulatory
`monkeys (Text-fig. 2) decreased more rapidly than in
`controls in each treatment group from early to mid
`cycle (mean - 35% compared with - 16% control.
`P<0'001. at mid cycle) and this decline continued in
`the second half of the cycle (mean - 54% compared
`with — 6% control, P<0-001, at late cycle).
`In monkeys in which treatment did not block
`ovulation (Text-fig. 3), the mean effect of 1C1 182.?80
`on the endometrium in the first half of the cycle
`( — 27% compared with +60% control. P<D-0l] was
`
`Journal of Endocrinology (1993} 138, 203—7209
`
`InnoPharma Exhibit 1057.0005
`
`

`

`y
`
`298
`
`M. DUKES and withers
`
`Efiecm of EC! 182,780 in Mull menstruating manicey;
`
`seen in the anawlawry mankcys
`less than that
`but not significantly {1333305} 50* Haw-wan that:
`mean respmse cancealccl mid: diffcrcnces between
`inéividual monkeys with five {3f the seven animals
`shnwing shrinkage (mean « 353:5%} whilst
`the:
`ramaining two mankeys experienced net growth at"
`the endametrium (+103% and +28%). In the latter
`animals, the gmmh 0f endamemum resumed in the
`luteal phase of the cycle 12+?O%) at a rate similar :0
`mat
`in animated mankeys {+55%}. Mean lissae
`valume remained, hawever, legs than that in animated
`canimls at the: and 0f the cycle: (Pvillfil), but grater
`than that
`in anomlatery monkeys (P<O-DOI). A
`similar pattern at" change was observed in the
`myamelrium (Texbfig. 3). At mid cycle the mean
`valume {3f
`the tissue was
`reduced significantly
`in 33%: P<0m compared with central) and this
`alike: was mt different {mm that
`in amvulawry
`animals (w 35%} However, as was the case for the
`endomelrium,‘ the: myometrium did recover in the
`luteal phase (+18%) but m: m the volume Seen in
`cwtmls. Al
`the late cycle ubservatiun, meets (in?
`treatment an this mynmstrium were significantly lesg
`{was}; in ovulaiary than in anavulawry mankeys.
`
`DISCUSSIGN
`
`MRI pmvidess an accurate: and rapmducihle means 0f
`measuring the changes in vellum: 0f the uterus in
`rcspoma in mmmgen trcalmem in ovaficcmmizgd
`moakeys (Watertight; e: 01. 199E) and has been aged in
`evaluate the antimemlwphic antigen 0:“ lC‘l 132330
`(Dukes e: m“. 1992} This technical}: has hem applied
`previously 10 determine the changes in volmm of
`the endometrlam and myometrium during the can ms
`of the namai mensirual cycle {If
`314'. 53332935er
`(Waive-“110:3 s: all. 1992) and in this {apart to measure
`the flats of treatmsnt with ICI 182388 {m mass
`changcsl
`At the time of menstruation, uterine aim, in partic-
`ular that of the endemetrium, would be expecmd m
`reach a minimum and 10 increase timing the failicular
`plus: {3f the cycle and, m a lesser Extent, in the lutgal
`phase. "Fa aédress this question, MRI measuremems
`were made at 53:13, mici am! lat: Cyclt: in each of ma
`manual cyclas in ten monkeys. In the early part :32“ the
`cycle (days 2-4), the valuma if she endamctrium and
`myomatrium in individuals varied ever a wiée range
`{up in fival‘alcl), but tissue volumes were: much lass
`variable in repetitive measurements in the same
`indiviclual (Taxi—fig. I), A cigar pattern 0? change:
`emerged during {he mmstruai cycle in which signifh
`cant gmmh cf the: endomelrium was $3311 in both {ha
`fallicular and luteal phases. Perhaps surprisingly, ths
`mean inflame in six: 0f that: mdnmeu‘ium was similar
`
`Jamaal q! Macriwlugy (19%} 138. 2133-209
`
`comparing the first and second half of {he cycle.
`Gastradial is cansidered m be flat: majar mitagan for
`the uterus and it was thus anticipated that :13: laxgest
`change in this andnmmrium would occur in the falli-
`cular phase at” the cycle. Hewever, a propcrtionately
`similar increase in the valume at” the andametrium
`
`was seen in the luteal phase ef the cycle, MRI cannot
`be: used to dflemine whether the effects 0f aestrogen
`and progestcmne on the size of the endometxium
`can be attrihuted mainly m epithelial hyperplasia as
`oppased to hyperfinphy. Changes; in the size of the
`myamctrium during {ha menstrual cycle were quantii
`tatively much smaller than these 0f the andnmeirium
`and! in the follicular phase, qualitatively difi‘erent
`{Ten-fig. l}. Remarkably, 11m mycmetrinm (increased
`in size when the endometrium was gmwing, mean
`myomclrmm mlmne being smaller in mid cycle than
`at menstruatlen. This may indicate that that: lhreslmld
`0f sensitivity of the myomctrium m oeslmgcns is
`higher than that 01‘ the endumcmum andior thal the
`rate at which {he myemetrium responds :0 changes
`in homanal status is lesa than that far the enciw
`metrium. Hawcwr mile:
`lrryltvcflzlanimus1
`such as
`harmoneénduced changcs;
`is: muscle: mm, may
`influfince the apparent size. cf the uterus and are mm
`amaumed for in these MRI images.
`Initial slutiies (11‘ the efiects cf ICI 182380 em-
`playecl a daily {lasing regimen with the antioestrogen
`laminated in propylene glycnl vehiflle {F3} to provide
`rapid release in vfivo. ll was Shawn previously thal the
`chasm (11:35:35 (if K11 132,?3l} {0-1—82 mglkg per day}
`achieve complete and rapidly reversible blackadc uf
`exogeneus assuage!) stimulation at” the uterus in the
`ovariectamized mankeys {Dukes a: all. 1992). Daily
`treatment timing the menstrual cycle pmvided c183:
`tfidence that 1C1 £32,780 also has a substantial
`antieestmgenic efi’act {>11 the uterus in intafl monkeys
`{Taxi-figs 2 and 3}. The magnitude of the anti
`uterotmphic cfi'ect was strangly influenced by the
`censurrent cndocrlna effects of
`ICI 182330,
`in
`particular by whether the munkeys ovulated during
`the: treatment pflfifld. In anovulatory monkeys, am
`only was the manual
`increase in volume 01‘ the
`endamclrium in this: fallicular phas: abs:an the: render»
`metrium actually dccrcasad in size to: velume mm-
`parable to these 3:611 in avariecmmizcd munkays afth
`oestrogen withdrawal (Wanner: at al. 1991; Dukes
`er al. 1992}, indicating that treatment achievecl mm—
`pletc blackade 0f 1hr: trophic acticn of endegenaus
`
`matrugcnsl This blockacic of“ nastragrzn actian (m that:
`endametrium was snslained in the mortal half of
`
`the cycle. An fiesta-agar: withdrawalwlike amiss-n an the
`myameitium was also recorded, where the normal
`small damage in volume: at" the mynmetrium in the
`fallicular phase was significantly amplified by ICI
`l82,?8fi, and 3150 became similar in magnimdz: {a than
`
`InnoPharma Exhibit 1057.0006
`
`

`

`
`
`m. DUKES and others 209
`Efi‘eem af EC! 182. 381i} is: ads}: mensrmring mankeys
`
`seen follawmg cestrogen withdrawal in ovariectm
`might} mankeys. This shrinkage. :1? {he myamirium
`ceatinuad in the luteal phase.
`The alternative oil-«based mug-acting {emulating
`(F2) of ICE 182,780, shown previausly to sustain
`blockade al' the ulcrolmphic actiorl a? assimilin in
`ovarieclomimé monkeys far appmximately 1 month
`(Dukes er 3!. 3992), graduced cfl'acls 0n the uterus
`similar to these: a? the short-acting Formulation.
`'I'heSc previws phamacnlagieal findings are cmircly
`cansistem with the findings in the present study with
`respect ta the duratian at” actien, the apparent dese-
`response, and the longer sustained blockade ni‘
`myamctrial than enclamelrial gmwzh. In mankeys
`rendared anevulatery, the antinlerotmphic effml of
`the 4H) mgfkg dase was inclistinguishable {mm that
`(if the shawaming fannulalion. Hawever, the law:
`2-5 mgflcg time dizl net fully black the lmphie acliun
`pandagcnuus assuagcns on the enéumeitium in the
`mam! half at" the cyclé, but did cam pragrcsslve
`myomctrial shrinkagfi. This prevides further evidence
`that the threshold sf sensitivity 0f the myemttrimn to
`nestrugens is higher Khan that of the endamelrium.
`With hath fowulations, the antiutemtmphic all?»
`navy of ICI 182380 in monkeys that maimed during
`treatment was mole variable: and generally smaller
`than in anovulamry animals, but mill substantial in
`the majority {five of aeven} of individuals {Text-figs 2
`and 3}.
`Overall, 91‘ the total :32" 22 treated ‘cycles’, 15 were
`anmulamry. With both fonnuiations there was same
`:vidence:
`that
`inhibilion of ovulalmn was éasm
`
`related, but than: were insufficient. data m efitablish
`slalistimlly aigm’ficanl clifi‘erences. The reascms {at the
`variability between individuals in their susceptibility
`{0 blockade a!“ ovulation are rm: understand.
`
`These studies warm mmplated usng nan-invasive
`:11 methods will: fewer than 20 animals. In practice
`slick infamatian is unabtainablc in terminal experi»
`meats. Far example, it is estimated that nitration of
`myometrial shrinkage at the sama timz as cndamelrial
`gmwth by terminal methads at the same significant:
`lcvel weuld have required we: 3’30 animals. Thus,
`MRI may be a particularly sensitive and pewarful
`100} for clinical studies in endearine phannacalggy.
`The clinical usefulness of ICI 182380 remains in be
`dfitennined, but its efi‘cat in a case m“ spontanwus
`adenomyosis
`in a mankey has been described
`(Waterten e: :23. 1993}.
`
`ACKNGWLEEGEMEN?S
`
`We {hank S. A. Brew, M. Herrecks, D. Miller,
`J. S. W. Morrell. 3. B. Latcumbe-Mcbauall, l). Priest
`and .l. Tattershall far expert technical assistance.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Aadwyku. I. 3.... Blank-mad, 21., Mambafl. L. 5.. Mama. 5. 13.,
`Erica}; H. .9. 133:. R. B. (1933}. Us: cf an aganlxfis analng
`nf gonadmropiwrelcaaing llama“: {naiarelin} w twat
`leiomyamas: mama“! by ma.ng rmnancc imaging.
`Amarimn £2an :9} Qészerrirx and Gymmlogy 1.58, 903M910.
`Bartuli, 3. 1%. Maulin. (i, Balsam-33+. l... Chagnaud, C. S:
`Kasharian, M. {1991}. This normal Bums an magnctit
`mum imaging and variatlans amaze-z! with the:
`mammal 3:31;. Surgical-W&$&g§€ Assaimy l3, 213420.
`9333133.. B. E... Hamil, PI. & Jaffc. R. B. (19823}. Uterine:
`imaging: efi'wlfi (If harmonal stimulation. Radialagy 1159,
`323-1213.
`Dukes. M. Miller. 3)., Wakeling, A. E. & Waterion. I. (‘3.
`(I992). Améulemiwphic 1:3me 9f a pure amimlmgm, ICI
`182380: magnetic ram-nan“ imaging of the stems in
`avariestomimd monktys. Jamaal {If Endaamlagy 135,
`339-341
`Rayner, 3}. IL. Mack, L. A... Sauna. M. 1L, Shumaa, W. R.
`Mamana. M. A. a: Man. a. A. (1936}. Changing appearauw
`0f the rim-mall uterus timing the menstrual cycle; Radiafagy
`16!, 459-462.
`McCarthy, 8.. Taubcr. C. & Gert. I. (1986). Fatal-naive pelvis
`anammy: MR assessment at” vadatiom during the menslmal
`cycle and will: use at“ am} wntraccpiivts. Raéiaiagy 1&8}.
`l 194 23.
`
`Wakeling. A. E... flakes. M. & fiawler. 1. {I993}. A patent
`specific: part; antimslmgcit with clinical mmnfial. Cancel!
`Remam‘: 51, 3367-38?3.
`Watwon. .l. (2., 3mm. 8. A... flakes. 1%.. Harm-sits. M. 3:
`Wadsworth. P. {3993}. A $381: of aficnomyasis diagnmtd by
`magmatic remancc imaging and treated with the navel pure
`mtmlregen ICI NEW). Lawlvawzy Animal Scimw {In
`Press-.3
`Waleflon, .l. {1. mmmlwficbouall. 3. E. 8: Mill::'. l}. {3992}.
`Quantitative MR! of" the washing and Mann in monkeys.
`Magnesia Remnants in .3696er 28. 3&9}.
`Watering, J. fl, Miller. 1)., Bukas, M. & Harrell, J. S. W.
`(W913. leique NMR imaging sf the mama in macaques:
`marina teaponxe: w manger: stimulatian. Magattiicé Rename
`in Medicine 20. 223439.
`Wimyk, Fl. 13.. 3311623, C. 1... Richards, (3. 1., (3131‘. M. 3.,
`Geadal, E. 3.. Rabimwitz. J. G. & Laura's", N. (£983).
`Comparison {if magmatic manna: imaging and ultrasonnd in
`evalualing willme and mtlmmtrial dwclnpmcm {Maugham
`the 33mm? 63ml: Fag-way we? Sig-ti!in 48. 96§~9?S.
`Kama. Ni, McCarthy, 8., Scam. L, Langc, R, Levy. (3.. Valle.
`3. 8: Camilla. F”. (39%). Munimring therapy with a
`gunadotropm—rcleaszng humane analag: utiliiy 0f MR
`imaging. Rafiaiagy ['35. 503606.
`
`Jamaal a)!” Emtrmafagy {1993} 338,. 233.209
`
`InnoPharma Exhibit 1057.0007
`
`

`

`a
`
`Efacm 9f 16.? 182.789 m Md: mmsruwmg mankeys
`2m 51. mums and mhars
`n
`
`fiESCRIPTiON 0F PLATE
`
`Magnetic remnants: (MR) images a: the monkey uterus.
`Each illustraticm is a den-ail, represgming 3% X 3-4 cm,
`{mm 031: 3311:: at" 111:: eight racorded at cash maasurcmem.
`The: appearanca a: mid-cat?” utcri is Shawn as faklows.
`Tap raw: images abtained a: day 3 (Fig. 1), day 16 (Fig.
`2} and flay 24 (Fig. 3} if an animated menstrual cycle.
`Swami raw; images ubtained at day 3 (Fig. 4}, day 15
`(Fig. 5} and day M (Fig. 6) in the same animai during a
`cycle: is: which 6'} mg 1C1 18233433“ was injamd wily
`fram day 3. Third row: imagea obtained at day 2 (Fig. 3'),
`day E6 (Fig. 3) and day 23 (Fig. 9} at“ an untreated
`menstrual cycle. Batmm row: imagw obtained at day 2
`
`(Fig. 10}, day 16 (Fig. 11) and day 23 (Fig. 12} in the
`same animal éuring a cycle in which 4 mg 131 182,?8flikg
`sustained-Eckmse farmuiatien was injected an day 2. The
`cycies ahown in the: mp three mm were owiatarjr. Fm:
`at five mnmtfi: macs sf MR signal annuity an scan:
`{33:11:31 sigma} wig}, menstmai hammrhagc (0913: during
`menstruation); high siwal. endamctfium; mediums—19w
`signal, myommial junctinn mac; mediumhigh sigma}.
`myomtrium; and no signal. peripharal adipose tisaue.
`The: area (after: messenmhapefi} a!“ high signal infirmity
`secs: 3: the left; in Figs ‘2“«12 is mine in thx: bladder. At:
`nvary is partiafly visible {hottum right) in Figs “3-H.
`
`Jaw-Ra! {if Endae‘finafagy (19%} 13$. 233%”
`
`InnoPharma Exhibit 1057.0008
`
`

`

`I'l \l'l
`
`Ifflm-H u] If] ).\'._‘_ 735’“ m mfny nwrnn'mumg Hmull't‘lw
`
`I
`
`\I m Kl N‘ {ind others
`
`
`
`.|.u~n:.- r Iizu
`
`Jumnm' a»: Urdu. mud-«:1 ci‘MH HR. III? 3'”
`
`12
`
`InnoPharma Exhibit 1057.0009
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket