throbber
Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document6 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1o0f9PagelD#: 74
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALLDIVISION
`
`GODO KAISHAIP BRIDGE1,
`
`Case No. 2:17-cv-00100
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`XILINX, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 (“Plaintiff’ or “IP Bridge”) files this First Amended
`
`Complaint for Patent Infringement (“Complaint”) against Defendant Xilinx, Inc. (“Defendant” or
`
`“Xilinx”). Plaintiff alleges as follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This is an action for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,893,501 (the “’501
`
`patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 7,265,450 (the “’450 Patent’).
`
`2.
`
`IP Bridge is a Japanese corporation having a principal address of c/o Sakura Sogo
`
`Jimusho, 1-11 Kanda Jimbocho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0051 Japan.
`
`4.
`
`Xilinx, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business located
`
`at 2100 Logic Drive, San Jose, California 95154. Xilinx maintains a substantial presencein this
`
`State through its regional sales office located at 5801 Tennyson Parkway, Suite 460, Plano,
`
`Texas 75024. Xilinx can be served via its registered agent for service of process, CT Corporation
`
`System, 1999 Bryan Street, Suite 900, Dallas, Texas 75201. Upon information andbelief, Xilinx
`
`is registered with the Texas Secretary of State to conduct business in Texas and has been since at
`
`PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT- Page1
`
`TSMC v. Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
`IPR2017-01843
`TSMC 1228
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document6 Filed 02/01/17 Page 2 of 9 PagelID#: 75
`
`least June 8, 1990. Xilinx conducts business operations within the Eastern District of Texas
`
`throughits facilities in Plano, Texas.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`4.
`
`This action arises under the Patent Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 1, et
`
`seq., including 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281, 283, 284, and 285. This is a patent infringementlawsuit,
`
`over which this Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
`
`5.
`
`This Court has general and specific personal jurisdiction over Defendant because
`
`it is present in and transacts and conducts businessin and with residents of this District and the
`
`State of Texas. IP Bridge’s causesofactionarise,at least in part, from Defendant’s contacts with
`
`and activities in this State and this District. In addition, upon information and belief, Defendant
`
`has committed acts of infringement within this District and this State by, inter alia, making,
`
`selling, offering for sale, importing, and/or using products that infringe one or more claimsof the
`
`patents-in-suit. Defendant, directly and/or through intermediaries, uses, sells, ships, distributes,
`
`offers for sale, and/or advertises or otherwise promotes products in this State and this District.
`
`Defendant regularly conducts andsolicits business in, engages in other persistent courses of
`
`conduct in, and/or derives substantial revenue from goods and services providedto residents of
`
`this State and this judicial District.
`
`6.
`
`Uponinformation and belief, Defendanthas purposefully and voluntarily placed
`
`one or more infringing productsinto the stream of commerce with the expectation that they will
`
`be purchased and/orused byresidents of this District and/or incorporated into downstream
`
`products purchased by consumersin this District, including by directly or indirectly working
`
`with subsidiaries, distributors, and other entities located within this District and this State .
`
`PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT- Page 2
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document6 Filed 02/01/17 Page 3 of 9 PagelD #: 76
`
`a
`
`Defendant maintains highly interactive and commercial websites, accessible to
`
`residents of Texasandthis judicial District, through which Defendant promotes its products and
`
`services, including products that infringe the patents-in-suit.
`
`8.
`
`Venueis properin this District under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400(b) for at least
`
`the reasonsset forth above.
`
`COUNT ONE: INFRINGEMENTOF U.S. PATENT NO.7,893,501
`
`9.
`
`IP Bridge adoptsandrestates the allegations in paragraphs1-8 asif fully set forth
`
`herein.
`
`10.
`
`On February 22, 2011, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued the
`
`’501 Patent, “Semiconductor Device Including MISFET Having Internal Stress Film” A true and
`
`correct copy of the ’501 Patentis attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`11.
`
`By assignment, Plaintiff owns theentire right, title, and interest in and to the °501
`
`patent, including the right to sue and recover damages, including damagesfor past infringement.
`
`12.
`
`Defendant has had knowledgeofthe ’501 patent no later than September 21,
`
`2016—the date on whichthe parties met and Plaintiff IP Bridge provided specific notice that
`
`Defendant waspracticing the ’501 patent.
`
`The 501 patent is valid and enforceable.
`
`Defendanthas at no time, either expressly or impliedly, been licensed under the
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`*501 patent.
`
`15.
`
`Uponinformation and belief, Defendant has been and nowisdirectly, literally
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), and/or equivalently under the doctrine of equivalents, infringing the
`
`’501 patent by making,using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing in or into the United
`
`States, without authority, products that fall within the scope of one or more claimsof the ’501
`
`PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT— Page 3
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document6 Filed 02/01/17 Page 4of9PagelD#: 77
`
`patent including, but not limited to, the Kintex-7 28nm FPGA family of programmable
`
`integrated circuits, and devices that perform substantially the same function in substantially the
`
`same wayto achieve substantially the same result (the “FPGA devices”). Upon information and
`
`belief, all Xilinx devices employing Xilinx’s 28nm technology, including the FPGA devices
`
`noted above,infringe the ’501 patent because each accused Xilinx product and device comprises
`
`a MISFETwith all additional elements recited in at least claims 1, 5-7, 10, 11, 15-19, 21, and 23-
`
`25 ofthe ’501 patent. In particular, each accused Xilinx product’s and device’s circuit includes
`
`an active region made of a semiconductor substrate, a gate-insulating film formed onthe active
`
`region, a gate electrode formed on the gate-insulating film, source/drain regions formed in
`
`regions ofthe active region located on both sides of the gate electrode,a silicon nitride film
`
`formed over from side surfaces of the gate electrode to upper surfaces of the source/drain regions
`
`wherein thesilicon nitride film is not formed on an upper surface of the gate electrode and the
`
`gate electrode protrudes upward from a surfacelevelofparts of the silicon nitride film locatedat
`
`both side surface of the gate electrode. As an example, Xilinx’s infringementofat least claim 1
`
`of the 501 patent by the Kintex-7 28nm FPGAisillustrated in the charts attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit B.
`
`16.
`
`Since nolater than the date upon whichit first learned of the ’501 patent,
`
`Defendanthas induced, and is continuing to actively and knowingly induce, with specific intent,
`
`infringementof the ’501 patent by its customers under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b). Defendant further has
`contributed to the infringement of the 501 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(c), by making,using,
`
`offering for sale, selling, and/or importing image sensors. Defendant encouragesandfacilitates
`
`infringing sales and uses of image sensors throughthe creation and dissemination of promotional
`
`and marketing materials, instructional materials, product manuals, and/or technical materials to
`
`PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT- Page 4
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document6 Filed 02/01/17 Page 5 of 9 PagelD #: 78
`
`manufacturers and/or distributors. Defendant contributes to infringement by others, including
`
`manufacturers, distributors, resellers, and end users, knowingthat its FPGA devicesconstitute a
`
`material part of the inventions of the °501 patent, knowing those FPGA devicesto be especially
`
`madeor adapted to infringe the 501 patent, and knowing that those FPGA devicesare notstaple
`
`articles or commodities of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use. Defendant
`
`knew,or should have known,that its encouragement wouldresult in infringementofat least one
`
`claim of the ’501 patent.
`
`17.
`
`Defendant has andis continuing to willfully infringe the ’501 patent by, at
`
`minimum,continuing to engage in infringing activities after Plaintiff notified Defendant of
`
`Defendant’s infringement. For that reason, Defendant has acted despite an objectively high
`
`likelihoodthatits actions constituted infringementof a valid patent and such objective risk of
`
`infringement was known to Defendantor so obvious that Defendant should have knownit.
`
`COUNT TWO: INFRINGEMENTOF U.S. PATENT NO.7,265,450
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`IP Bridge restates the allegations in paragraphs 1-8 as if fully set forth herein.
`
`On September4, 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued the
`
`’450 Patent, “Semiconductor Device and Method for Fabricating the Same.” A true and correct
`
`copy of the ’450 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
`
`20.
`
`By assignment, Plaintiff owns the entire right, title, and interest in and to the ’450
`
`Patent, including the right to sue and recover damages, including damagesfor pastinfringement.
`
`21.
`
`Defendant has had knowledgeofthe ’450 patent no later than September21,
`
`2016—the date on whichthe parties met and Plaintiff IP Bridge provided specific notice that
`
`Defendant was practicing the ’450 patent.
`
`22.
`
`The ’450 Patent is valid and enforceable.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT -— Page 5
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document6 Filed 02/01/17 Page 6 of9PagelD#: 79
`
`23.
`
`Defendanthasat no time, either expressly or impliedly, been licensed under the
`
`°450 patent.
`
`24.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant has been and nowisdirectly,literally
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), and/or equivalently under the doctrine of equivalents, infringing the
`
`’450 patent by making,using,selling, offering for sale, and/or importing in or into the United
`
`States, without authority, products that fall within the scope of one or more claimsof the 450
`
`patent including, but notlimited to, the Kintex-7 28nm FPGAand Virtex-6 40nm FPGAdevice
`
`families of programmable semiconductors and devices that perform substantially the same
`
`function in substantially the same way to achieve substantially the same result (the “FPGA
`
`device families”). Upon information andbelief, all Xilinx devices employing Xilinx’s 28nm
`
`technology andall devices employing the 40nm technology, including the FPGA devices noted
`
`above,infringe the °450 patent because each accused Xilinx product and deviceis a
`
`semiconductor comprising a substrate, a first interlayer dielectric film provided on the substrate,
`
`a first interconnect provided within the first interconnect groove with convex or concave portions
`
`at least at one ofits side surfaces and bottom surface, a secondinterlayer dielectric film provided
`
`overthe first interlayer dielectric film andthe first interconnect, anda first plug that passes
`
`through the secondinterlayer dielectric film and comesinto contact with a partofthe first
`
`interconnect and anyandall additional elementsrecited in at least claims 1, 2,3, 8, 10, 11, 13
`
`and 14 of the ’450 patent. As an example, Xilinx’s infringementofat least claim 1 of the *450
`
`patent by the Kintex-7 28nm FPGAisillustrated in the charts attached hereto as Exhibit D.
`
`25.
`
`Since no later than the date upon whichit first learned of the ’450 patent,
`
`Defendant has induced, andis continuing to actively and knowingly induce, with specific intent,
`
`infringementof the ’450 patent by its customers under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b). Defendantfurther has
`
`PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT- Page 6
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document6 Filed 02/01/17 Page 7 of 9 PagelD #: 80
`
`contributed to the infringementof the ’450 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(c), by making, using,
`
`offering for sale, selling, and/or importing image sensors. Defendant encouragesandfacilitates
`
`infringing sales and uses of image sensors through the creation and dissemination of promotional
`
`and marketing materials, instructional materials, product manuals, and/or technical materials to
`
`manufacturers and/or distributors. Defendantcontributes to infringement by others, including
`
`manufacturers, distributors, resellers, and end users, knowing that its FPGA device families
`
`constitute a material part of the inventions of the ’450 patent, knowing those FPGA device
`
`families to be especially made or adaptedto infringe the ’450 patent, and knowingthat those
`
`FPGAdevice families are not staple articles or commodities of commerce suitable for substantial
`
`non-infringing use. Defendant knew, or should have known,that its encouragement would result
`
`in infringementofat least one claim of the ’450 patent.
`
`26.
`Defendant hasandis continuing to willfully infringe the °450 patent by,at
`minimum, continuing to engage in infringing activities after Plaintiffnotified Defendant of
`
`Defendant’s infringement. For that reason, Defendant has acted despite an objectively high
`
`likelihoodthat its actions constituted infringementofa valid patent and such objective risk of
`
`infringement was knownto Defendantor so obvious that Defendant should have knownit.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT- Page 7
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document6 Filed 02/01/17 Page 8 of 9 PagelD#: 81
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`Plaintiff prays for the following relief:
`
`A.
`
`A judgmentthat Xilinx has infringed and continues to infringe the 501 and °450
`
`patents;
`
`B.
`
`A judgmentand order requiring the Xilinx to pay IP Bridge damages under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 284,including treble damagesfor willful infringement as provided by 35 U.S.C. § 284,
`
`and supplemental damagesfor any continuing post-verdict infringementup until entry of the
`
`final judgment with an accounting as needed;
`
`C.
`
`A judgmentandorder requiring Xilinx to pay IP Bridge pre-judgment and
`
`post-judgmentinterest on the damages awarded;
`
`D.
`
`A judgmentand orderfinding this to be an exceptional case and requiring Xilinx
`
`to pay the costs of this action (includingall disbursements) and attomeys’ fees as provided by 35
`
`U.S.C. § 285;
`
`E.
`
`A permanentinjunction against Xilinx’s direct infringement, active inducements
`
`ofinfringement, and/or contributory infringement ofthe ’501 and ’450patents, as well as against
`
`each of Xilinx’s agents, employees, representatives, successors, and assigns, and thoseacting in
`
`privity or in concert with Xilinx;
`
`F,
`
`G.
`
`In the eventa final injunction is not awarded, a compulsory on-going royalty; and
`
`Suchother and further relief as the Court deems just and equitable.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT-Page 8
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document6 Filed 02/01/17 Page 9 of9PagelD#: 82
`
`DATED: February 1, 2017
`
`/s/ Michael W. Shore
`Michael W. Shore, Texas Bar No. 18294915
`Lead Attorney
`mshore@shorechan.com
`Alfonso Garcia Chan, Texas Bar No. 24012408
`achan@shorechan.com
`Jennifer M. Rynell, Texas Bar No. 24033025
`jrynell@shorechan.com
`Christopher L. Evans, Texas Bar No.24058901
`cevans@shorechan.com
`Russell DePalma, Texas Bar No.00795318
`redepalma@shorechan.com
`Ari Rafilson, Texas Bar No. 24060465
`arafilson@shorechan.com
`Andrew M. Howard, Texas Bar No. 24059973
`ahoward@shorechan.com
`
`SHORE CHAN DePUMPO LLP
`901 Main Street, Suite 3300
`Dallas, Texas 75202
`Telephone: 214-593-9110
`Facsimile: 214-593-9111
`
`Hiromasa Ohashi*
`ohashi@ohashiandhorn.com
`Jeff J. Horn Jr., Texas Bar No. 24027234
`horn@ohashiandhorn.com
`Cody A. Kachel, Texas Bar No. 24049526
`ckachel@ohashiandhorn.com
`OHASHI & HORN LLP
`325 North Saint Paul Street, Suite 4400
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`Telephone: 214-743-4170
`Facsimile: 214-743-4179
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
`
`*Motion for pro hac vice admission tobefiled
`
`PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT- Page 9
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document 6-1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 21 PagelD #: 83
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document SAcA 84
`
`US007893501B2
`
`a2) United States Patent
`Tsutsui et al.
`
`US 7,893,501 B2
`(10) Patent No.:
`*Feb. 22, 2011
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`(54) SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING
`MISFET HAVING INTERNAL STRESS FILM
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`5,023,676 A
`
`6/1991 Tatsuta
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: Masafumi Tsutsui, Osaka (JP);
`Hiroyuki Umimoto, Hyogo (JP); Kaori
`Akamatsu, Osaka (JP)
`
`(73) Assignee: Panasonic Corporation, Osaka (JP)
`
`(*) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term ofthis
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`
`This patent is subject to a terminal dis-
`claimer.
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 12/170,191
`
`(22) Filed:
`
`Jul. 9, 2008
`
`(65)
`
`Prior Publication Data
`US 2009/0050981 Al
`Feb. 26, 2009
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`(63) Continuation of application No. 11/730,988, filed on
`Apr. 5, 2007, now Pat. No. 7,417,289, which is a con-
`tinuation of application No. 10/859,219, filed on Jun.
`3, 2004, now Pat. No. 7,205,615.
`
`(Continued)
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`JP
`
`52-120776
`
`10/1977
`
`(Continued)
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Shimizu, A., et al., “Local Mechanical-Stress Comtrol (LMC): A
`New Technique for CMOS_Performance Enhancement”, 2001,
`TEDM 01, p. 19.4.1-19.4.4.
`
`(Continued)
`
`Primary Examiner—Howard Weiss
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm—McDermmott Will & Emery
`LLP
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A semiconductor device includes a first-type internal stress
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`(30)
`film formed ofa silicon oxide film over source/drain regions
`ofannMISFETandasecond-typeinternal stress film formed
`Jun. 16,2003
`(IP)
`ceccccoseesccecvsnsnevsseesee 2003-170335
`ofa TEOSfilm over source/drain regions ofa pMISFET.Ina
`channel region ofthe nMISFET,a tensile stress is generated
`in the direction ofmovement ofelectrons dueto the first-type
`internal stress film, so that the mobility of electrons is
`increased. Ina channelregion ofthe pMISFET,a compressive
`stress is generated in the direction of movementofholes due
`to the second-type internal stress film, so that the mobility of
`holes is increased.
`
`(51)
`
`Int. Cl.
`(2006.01)
`HOLL 29/76
`(2006.01)
`HOIL 29494
`(2006.01)
`HOIL 31/062
`(2006.01)
`HOLL 31/113
`(2006.01)
`HOLL 31/119
`(52) US. Cl.sissicssicscanstennoniceamaminnnteen 2511369
`(58) Field of Classification Search .................. 257/369
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`25 Claims, 9 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document 6-1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 3 of 21 PagelD#: 85
`
`US 7,893,501 B2
`Page 2
`
`
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`B1*
`Bl
`
`B2*
`B2
`B2
`
`6,437,404
`6,573,172
`6,870,230
`6,977,194
`6,982,465
`7,022,561
`7,205,615
`7,417,289
`2003/0040158
`2004/0075 148
`
`8/2002
`6/2003
`3/2005
`12/2005
`1/2006
`4/2006
`4/2007
`8/2008
`2/2003
`4/2004
`
`ccscccrerverses 257/347
`
`....cccrerees 257/365
`
`Xiang et al.
`En et al.
`Matsuda et al.
`Belyansky etal.
`Kumagai et al.
`Huangetal.
`Tsutsui et al.
`Tsutsui et al.
`Saitoh
`
`257/369
`.o...001000-.
`......0s00.0... 257/369
`
`Kumagai etal.
`
`9/2005 Chan et al.
`2005/0194596 Al
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`60-236209
`11/1985
`01-042340 A
`2/1989
`2003-086708
`3/2003
`2004-193 166
`7/2004
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`
`Japanese Office Action, with English translation, issued in Japanese
`Patent Application No. 2003-170335, mailed Dec. 22, 2009.
`Japanese Office Action, with English translation,issued in Japanese
`Patent Application No. 2003-170335, mailed Mar. 23, 2010.
`* cited by examiner
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document 6-1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 4 of 21 PagelD#: 86
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2011
`
`Sheet 1 of 9
`
`US 7,893,501 B2
`
`Pits t
`
`Rn
`
`
`Rp
`
`
`10
`
` eed
`AbelePALL
`8a
`NISL
`
`5 4a 2
`
`3byy\
`
`5 4b 2
`
`Lb
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document 6-1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 5 of 21 PagelD #: 87
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2011
`
`Sheet 2 of 9
`
`US 7,893,501 B2
`
`=
`
`FIG. 2A
`
`e
`
`Fit, 2C
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document 6-1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 6 of 21 PagelD #: 88
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb.22, 2011
`
`Sheet 3 of 9
`
`US 7,893,501 B2
`
`FIG. 3A
`
`6
`
`Ps
`
` GVolaABAe
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document 6-1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 7 of 21 PagelD#: 89
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2011
`
`Sheet 4 of 9
`
`US 7,893,501 B2
`
`Rp
`Rn
`FIG. 4A
`
`o——————-""—?——~
`
`ALYSeth
`
`
`
`mi AVA ™\ YNa \
`Ny.AZa
`
`
`
`
`
`NaN
`
`
`
`
`SS fORall
`Heh
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document 6-1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 8 of 21 PagelD #: 90
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2011
`
`Sheet 5 of 9
`
`US 7,893,501 B2
`
`FIG. oA
`!
`
`Rn
`
`Rp
`
`A \
`\
`3bqy
`2
`4a
`5
`“a LY th
`ARALwee
`6aa <
`ar
`2 B8ajx|5 4a 2 ls
`FIG. Cz la
`Lb
`
`
`KEYLEELZ
`CAN
`
`
`eS ig{0 a 8 aa
`
`
`
` 2 3a Ix,x 4a 2 SieAb 2
`
`2
`
`3
`
`FIG. 5B
`
`5 4b 2
`
`\
`
`FIG. oD
`
`8a
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document 6-1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 9 of 21 PagelD#: 91
`
`US 7,893,501 B2
`
`Rn
`
`Rp
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2011
`
`Sheet6 of 9
`
`FIG. 6A
`
`SS
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document 6-1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 10 of 21 PagelD #: 92
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2011
`
`Sheet 7 of 9
`
`US 7,893,501 B2
`
`Rp
`Rn
`FIG. 7A
`
`—MFA@t@""“*". z
`
`Lb
`
`2
`
`
`
`FIG. 7B A
`
`la
`
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document 6-1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 11 of 21 PagelD #: 93
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2011
`
`Sheet 8 of 9
`
`US 7,893,501 B2
`
`i
`FIG. 8A
`
`|
`
`
`
`NOM
`INRANGE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6a
`V4 6
`
`NASIR
`NAC ANNIE
`
`i
`FIC. 8D © 3a lx la 5 4a : 3b . fe 4b
`
`Fea
`Geta
`
`
`
`
`LARC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`i
`i,
`
`
`
`2 3alx la 5 4a 2 3b1ly lb 5
`
`4b 2
`
`

`

`00-JRG-RSP Document 6-1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 12 of 21 PagelD #: 94
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Feb. 22, 2011
`
`Sheet 9 of 9
`
`US 7,893,501 B2
`
`FIG. 9A
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document 6-1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 13 of 21 PageiD#: 95
`
`US 7,893,501 B2
`
`1
`SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING
`MISFET HAVING INTERNAL STRESS FILM
`
`RELATED APPLICATIONS
`
`This application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser.
`No. 11/730,988,filed Apr. 5, 2007, now U.S.Pat. No. 7,417,
`289, which is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.
`10/859,219,filed Jun. 3, 2004, now US. Pat. No. 7,205,615,
`and claiming priority of Japanese Application No. 2003-
`170335, filed Jun. 16, 2003, the entire contents of each of
`which are hereby incorporated by reference.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention relates to a semiconductor device
`including an MISFETand a methodforfabricating the same,
`and moreparticularly relates to a measurefor increasing the
`mobility of carriers.
`Whena stress is generated in a semiconductorcrystal layer,
`a crystal-lattice constant varies and a band structure is
`changed, so that the mobility of carriers is changed. This
`phenomenonhas been knownasthe“piezoresistivity effect”. -
`Whether the carrier mobility is increased or reduced differs
`depending onthe plane direction of a substrate, the direction
`in which carriers move, and whetherthe stress is a tensile
`stress or a compressive stress. For example, in an Si (100)
`substrate, i.e., a silicon substrate of which the principal sur-
`face is the {100} plane, assumethatcarriers moveinthe [011]
`direction. When carriers are electrons, with a tensile stress
`generated in the direction in which electrons in a channel
`region move, the mobility ofthe carriers is increased. On the
`other hand, whencarriers are holes, with a compressive stress
`generated in the direction in which holes in a channel region
`move, the mobility of the carriers is increased. The increase
`rate of carrier mobility is proportional to the size ofa stress.
`In this connection, conventionally, there have been propos-
`als for increasing carrier mobility by applying a stress to a
`semiconductorcrystal layer to increase the operation speed of
`transistors andthelike. For example, in Reference 1, an entire
`semiconductor substrate is bent using an external device,
`thereby generating a stress in an active region of a transistor.
`
`15
`
`35
`
`2
`Theinternalstress film is capable of covering one or both
`of source/drain regions. In an nMISFET,the internal stress
`film generates a tensile stress substantially in the parallel
`direction to a gate length direction in a channel region(i.c.,
`the direction of movementofelectrons). In a pMISFET, the
`internal stress film generates a compressive stress substan-
`tially in the parallel direction to a gate length direction in a
`channelregion(i.e., the direction of movementof holes).
`Covering both side surfaces or both side and upper surfaces
`of a gate electrode, the internal stress film can generate a
`stress in the longitudinal direction of the channcl region
`through thegate electrode, thereby increasing the mobility of
`carriers.
`
`Moreover, covering a side surface ofthe gate electrode and
`an upper surface of the semiconductor substrate in two
`regions of the substrate sandwiching part of the gate elec-
`trode, whether the MISFETis an nMISFET or a pMISFET,
`the internal stress film can generate a tensile stress substan-
`tially in the parallel direction to the gate width direction ofthe
`MISFET,thereby increasing the mobility of carriers.
`A first method for fabricating a semiconductor device
`according to the present invention is a method in which an
`nMISFET and a pMISFETare formed in first and second
`active regions ofa semiconductor substrate, respectively, and
`thenfirst and secondinternalstress films which cover source/
`drain regions ofthe nMISFETand source/drain regions ofthe
`pMISFET,respectively, and generate a tensile stress and a
`compressive stress, respectively, substantially in the parallel
`directions to respective gate length directions of the channel
`regions are formed.
`According to this method, a CMOSdevice of which the
`operation speed is increased can be obtained.
`A second method for fabricating a semiconductor device
`according to the present invention is a method in which an
`internal stress film is formed first, a groove is formed in the
`internal stress film, a gate insulating film and a buried gate
`electrode are formed in the groove, and then the internalstress
`film is removed.
`
`According to this method, a stress which increases the
`mobility of carriers in the channel region can be generated
`using a remainingstress in the gate insulating film.
`
`SUMMARYOF THE INVENTION
`
`45
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`in the above-described known structure, an
`However,
`external device is needed in addition to a semiconductor
`substrate and a stress can be generated only in the same
`direction in an entire region ofthe semiconductorsubstrate in
`whichactive regionsofa transistor andthelike are provided
`and which is located in the principal surface side. For
`example, when an Si (100) substrate is used, neither the
`mobility of electrons nor the mobility of holes can be
`increased.
`
`It is therefore an objectofthe present invention to provide,
`by generating a stress which increases the mobility ofcarriers
`in a semiconductor layer without using an external device, a
`semiconductor device including a pMISFET and an nMiIS-
`FET ofwhich respective operation speeds are increased and a
`methodfor fabricating the same.
`A semiconductor device according to the present invention
`includes an internalstress film for generating a stress ina gate
`length direction in a channel region of an active region in
`which a MISFETis formed.
`
`Thus, the mobility of carriers in the MISFET can be
`increased by using the piezo resistivity effect.
`
`FIG.1 is a cross-sectionalview illustrating a semiconduc-
`tor device according to a first embodiment of the present
`invention.
`
`FIG. 2A through 2C are cross-sectional viewsillustrating
`first halfofrespective steps for fabricating the semiconductor
`device ofthe first embodiment.
`
`FIG.3A through 3C arc cross-sectional vicwsillustrating
`latter halfofrespective steps for fabricating the semiconduc-
`tor device ofthe first embodiment.
`
`35
`
`FIGS.4A through 4C are cross-sectional viewsillustrating
`first, second and third modified examples ofthe first embodi-
`ment.
`
`FIGS. 5A through 5Dare cross-sectional viewsillustrating
`respective steps for fabricating a semiconductor device
`according to the first modified exampleof the first embodi-
`ment.
`
`FIGS.6A through 6C are cross-sectional viewsillustrating
`respective steps for fabricating a semiconductor device
`accordingto the third modified example ofthe first embodi-
`ment.
`
`60
`
`65
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00100-JRG-RSP Document 6-1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 14 of 21 PagelD #: 96
`
`US 7,893,501 B2
`
`3
`FIGS.7A through 7D are cross-sectional viewsillustrating
`first half of respective steps for fabricating a semiconductor
`device according to a second embodiment of the present
`invention.
`FIGS.8A through 8Dare cross-sectional viewsillustrating
`latter half of respective steps for fabricating the semiconduc-
`tor device of the second embodiment.
`FIGS. 9A and 9B are a plane view of an MISFETof a
`semiconductor device according to a third embodimentofthe
`present invention and a cross-sectional view illustrating a
`cross-sectional structure taken along the line IX-IX (a cross
`section in the gate width direction), respectively.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENTS
`
`First Embodiment
`
`4
`film interposed therebetween,a stress is generated in the film
`itself. As for stress, there are tensile stress and compressive
`stress. In this embodiment and other embodiments,an inter-
`nal stress film in whicha tensile stress is generated substan-
`tially in the parallel directionto the direction in which carriers
`move(i.e., the gate length direction) in a channel region ofan
`MISFET isreferred to asa “first-type internalstress film” and
`an internal stress film in which a compressive stress is gen-
`erated substantially in the parallel direction to the direction in
`which carriers move (the gate length direction) in a channel
`region ofan MISFETisreferred to as a “second-type internal
`stress film”.
`Herein, the semiconductorsubstrate 1 is an Si substrate of
`whichthe principal surfaceis the {100} plane andis referred
`to as an Si (100) substrate for convenience. However, the
`{100} planeis a general nameforthe (+100) plane, the (0210)
`plane andthe (001) plane, and therefore, even a plane which
`is not exactly the {100} plane andistilted from the {100}
`plane by a less angle than 10 degree is considered to be
`FIG.1 is a cross-sectional view illustrating a semiconduc-
`substantially the {100} plane. Moreover,in this embodiment,
`tor device according to a first embodiment of the present
`the direction in which electrons move in the nMISFET and
`invention. As shown in FIG.1, a surface region ofa semicon-
`the direction in which holes movein the pMISFET(i.e., the
`ductorsubstrate 1, i.e., an Si (100) substrate is divided into a
`gate length direction ofeach MISFET) is the [011] direction.
`plurality ofactive regions 1a and 1by an isolation region2.
`The semiconductor device includes an nMISFET formation
`However, in this embodiment, the “(011] direction on the
`region Rn which includesthe active region 1¢ and in which an
`principal surface ofan Si (100) substrate” includes equivalent
`directions to the [011] direction, such as the [01-1] direction,
`nMISFETis to be formed and a pMISFET formation region
`the [0-11] direction, and the [0-1-1] direction,i.e., directions
`Rp whichincludesthe active region 15 and in which a pMIS-
`FETis to be formed.
`within the range of the <011> direction. That is, even a
`direction which is not exactly the [011] direction andtilted
`The nMISFETincludes n-type source/drain regions 3a and
`30
`4a each of which includes an n-type lightly doped impurity
`from the <011> direction by a less angle than 10 degree is
`region, an n-type heavily doped impurity region andasilicide
`considered to be substantially the [011] direction.
`layer such as a CoSi,layer, a gate insulating film 5 formed on
`Accordingto this embodiment,the followingeffects can be
`obtained.
`the active region 1a and made ofasiliconoxide film, a silicon
`In the nMISFET,whenthefirst-type internalstress film 8a
`oxynitride film orthe like, a gate electrode 6a formed onthe
`gate insulating film 5 and made ofpolysilicon, aluminum or
`is brought into a direct contact with a semiconductorlayer or
`
`the like, and a sidewall 7 covering a side surface of the gate made to face a semiconductorlayerwithathin film interposed
`electrode 6a and made ofan insulating film. Part ofthe active
`therebetween, a stress for compressingthefirst-type internal
`region 1a located under the gate electrode 6a is a channel
`stress film itself, i.e., a compressive stress is generated in the
`first-type internal stress film 8a. As a result, by the first-type
`region 1x in which electrons move (travel) when the nMIS-
`internalstress film 8a, the semiconductor layer adjacentto the
`FETis in an operationstate.
`first-type internalstress film 8a can be stretched in the vertical
`The pMISFETincludes

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket