throbber
United States Patent
`Barnes et al.
`
`[19]
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`5,505,816
`
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`Apr. 9, 1996
`
`llllllllllllllllllllllIllll|||||Illllllllllllllllllllllll||||l||||l||l|||||
`U8005505816A
`
`ETCHING 0F SILICON DIOXIDE
`SELECTIVELY T0 SILICON NITRIDE AND
`POLYSILICON
`
`7/1993 Kadomura ............................... 156/643
`5,250,772
`2/1994 Jeng etal.
`.............................. 156/646
`5,282,925
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`[54]
`
`175]
`
`Inventors: Michael S. Barnes, San Francisco,
`Calif.; John H. Keller, Poughkeepsie,
`N.Y.; William M. Holber, Boston,
`Mass; Tina J. Cotler, Newburgh, N.Y.;
`Jonathan D. Chapple-Sokol,
`Poughkeepsie, N.Y.; Dragan Podlesnik,
`New York City, NY.
`
`[73]
`
`Assignee:
`
`International Business Machines
`Corporation, Armonk, NY.
`
`[21]
`
`[22]
`
`[51]
`[52]
`
`[581
`
`[56]
`
`Appl. No.2 168,887
`
`Filed:
`
`Dec. 16, 1993
`
`Int. Cl.6 ..................................................... H01L 21/00
`US. Cl.
`..................................... 156/662.1; 156/6431;
`156/646.1; 437/225
`Field of Search .............................. 156/6431, 646.1,
`156/662.1; 437/225
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`4,352,724
`4,615,764
`4,711,698
`4,807,016
`5,030,319
`5,122,225
`5,128,744
`5,173,151
`
`10/1982
`10/1986
`12/1987
`2/1989
`7/1991
`6/1992
`7/1992
`12/1992
`
`..................... 156/643
`Sugishima et a1.
`156/643
`Bobbio et a1.
`.. 156/643
`Douglas .......
`Douglas ............. 357/67
`Nishino et a1.
`156/635
`Douglas
`.. 156/643
`.
`Asano et a1.
`..... 357/54
`Namose .......
`.. 156/643
`
`58-056317
`59—033833
`
`Japan.
`4/1983
`Japan.
`2/1984
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`“Plasma Chemical Aspects of Magnetron Ion Etching with
`CF4/O2 and CF4/H2h”; Plasma Processing and Synthesis of
`Materials; Material Research Soc; XVL; 1987; abstract
`only; Bright et al.
`
`Primary Examiner—R. Bruce Breneman
`Assistant Examiner—George Goudrean
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Whitham, Curtis, Whitham &
`McGinn; Harold Huberfeld
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Silicon dioxide on a substrate is directionally etched using a
`hydrogen halide plasma which is created within an etch
`chamber. The method selectively etches silicon dioxide
`relative to polysilicon and silicon nitride. A substrate and the
`combination of NH3 and NE, gases or the combination of
`CF4 and O2 gases mixed with H2 and N2 gases are located
`within an etch chamber. An electrical field is created within
`the etch chamber causing the gas mixture to form a plasma.
`The negative charge at the bottom of the chamber attracts the
`positively charged plasma, thereby etching the substrate in
`the downward direction. The result is an anisotropic product.
`The method is also shown to be efiective in non-selectively
`etching thermal and deposited oxides, resulting in a similar
`etch rate for the different types of oxides.
`
`15 Claims, 7 Drawing Sheets
`
`54
`
`56
`
` ///:
`
`
`
`
`IP Bridge Exhibit 2227
`IP Bridge Exhibit 2227
`TSMC v. Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
`TSMC v. Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
`IPR2017-01843
`IPR2017-01843
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 9, 1996
`
`Sheet 1 of 7
`
`5,505,816
`
`14
`_/
`
` FIG.1A
`
`2°
`
`PRIOR ART
`
`
`
`

`

`V
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 9, 1996
`
`Sheet 3 of 7
`
`5,505,816
`
`800
`
`0 Silicon Dioxide
`
`A Polysmcon-
`
`9 Silicon Nitride ’E 600
`
`400
`
`200
`
`E 3 g
`
`0
`
`0
`
`2°
`
`40
`
`50
`Time (sec)
`
`80
`
`100
`
`FIG.3
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 9, 1996
`
`Sheet 4 of 7
`
`5,505,816
`
`'
`
`695.0
`
`69 I .0
`
`687.0
`
`68 .0
`
`679.0
`
`2000
`
`FLUORINE - INITIAL
`
`1 00000
`
`
`
`FLUORINE — PROCESSED
`
`5000
`
`
`
`695.0
`
`691.0
`
`687.0
`
`68 .0
`
`679.0
`
`FLUORINE — BAKED
`
`FIG.4A
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 9, 1996
`
`Sheet 5 of 7
`
`5,505,816
`
`100000
`
`
`
`542.0
`
`538.0
`
`534.0
`
`53 O .
`
`OXYGEN — INITIAL
`
`5000
`
`20x
`
`542.0
`
`538.0
`
`534.0
`
`530.0
`
`526.0
`
`522.0
`
`OXYGEN - PROCESSED
`
`5000
`
`20x
`
`542.0
`
`538.0
`
`534.0
`
`530.0
`
`526.0
`
`522.0
`
`OXYGEN — BAKED
`
`FIG.4B
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 9, 1996
`
`Sheet 6 of 7
`
`5,505,816
`
`50000
`
`
`
`10 .0
`
`98.0
`
`SILICON - INII'IAL
`
`20000
`
`2.5 x
`
` 9.0 110.0
`
`10 .0
`
`98.0
`
`.
`
`SIUCON - PROCESSED
`
`
`
`10 .
`
`102.0
`
`98.0
`
`94.0
`
`SILICON — BAKED
`
`FIG/IO
`
`

`

`
`
`

`

`5,505,816
`
`1
`ETCHING OF SILICON DIOXIDE
`SELECTIVELY T0 SILICON NITRIDE AND
`POLYSILICON
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`
`The present invention generally relates to a surface pro-
`cessing technique of a silicon wafer substrate. Particularly,
`this invention relates to a technique for directionally remov—
`ing or dry etching of an oxide film, using a plasma of NH3
`and NF3 or CF4 and 02 mixed with H2 and N2.
`2. Description of the Prior Art
`The exposure of a surface of a silicon (Si) substrate to
`ambient air causes a layer of native silicon dioxide (SiOz) to
`form On its surface. The formation of the native SiO2 layer
`presents certain manufacturing difliculties since many semi-
`conductor processes, such as low-temperature epitaxy, poly-
`silicon deposition, and silicidation, require the silicon wafer
`surface to be free of all native SiOz. The prior art establishes
`that many difierent processes for etching or cleaning of the
`native SiO2 from Si surfaces have been developed. One of
`the most commonly used techniques for etching SiO2 is to
`expose the substrate to hydrofluoric acid (HF), either wet or
`dry. However, the use of liquid or vapor HF has major
`drawbacks for the semiconductor manufacturer because it is
`both highly toxic and highly corrosive. The high toxicity of
`HF requires the semiconductor manufacturer to implement
`safety procedures and devices which ensure that people and
`the environment are not injured by the HF gas. In addition,
`since HF is highly corrosive, it must be stored in containers
`and delivered to a cleaning or etch chamber in tubing which
`is resistant to corrosion. This type of equipment is generally
`more expensive than containers and tubing that do not
`possess anti—corrosive properties.
`It is also known in the prior an to selectively etch silicon
`dioxide using mixtures of fluorocarbon gases. However, this
`technique is also problematic due to the reaction inhibiting
`polymer which forms when the silicon or silicon nitride
`substrate is exposed to the fluorocarbon gases. In this
`technique, when oxide film is present, the oxygen in the
`oxide film prevents the formation of a reaction inhibiting
`polymer. However, once the oxide is etched through, the
`reaction inhibiting polymer can form and is deposited on the
`silicon or silicon nitride,
`inhibiting the etching of these
`films. The reaction inhibiting polymer film is diflicult to
`remove from the wafer. The polymer film can also passivate
`the chamber wall and electrode surfaces and is a source of
`particles. Finally,
`the etch selectivity,~in this process, is
`under 20:1 for SiO2 relative to polysilicon or silicon nitride.
`The use of wet etching techniques, as described above, to
`remove a thermal or native oxide film also present problems
`due to the variation in the wet etch rates of different oxide
`films. There are many types of oxide films currently in use,
`with two common ones being thermal oxide and deposited
`tetraethylorthosilicate TEOS) oxide. The etch rate of these
`films can vary by a factor of three, with the thermal oxides
`being slower. Since each wet etch performed reduces the
`film thickness of any exposed deposited oxide in proportion
`to the etch rate milo, it is usually necessary to adjust the
`initial thickness of the deposited oxide. Therefore, it would
`be desirable for the deposited oxides to etch at the same or
`a lower rate than the thermal oxides.
`
`US. Pat. No. 5,030,319 to Nishino et a1. and in the article
`to Nishino et 31., 1989 Dry Process Symposium IV-2 90-92
`(1989), discloses a method of selectively etching native
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`SiO2 from a silicon substrate using fluorine atoms and
`nitrogen hydrides produced by a NH3 and NF3 microwave
`discharge. This technique, as shown in FIG. 1A, discloses
`the use of a source 12 remotely positioned from etch
`chamber 16 to excite a gaseous NH3 and NF3 mixture into
`a plasma prior to its transport to the etch chamber 16. The
`substrate 18 is located on the floor 20 of etch chamber 16.
`The remote excitement of the gases causes the excited gases
`to randomly diifuse over the substrate which is to be etched.
`There is no directional control over the etching process. FIG.
`2B provides an example of etching using this method. Since,
`the excited particles etch in all directions an isotropic
`product is created. As shown, the process is effective in
`etching to the surface of the substrate 52, but results in the
`undercutting of the wall 58 in the area beneath resist pattern
`54 which should not to be etched. It is desirable for the
`
`etching product to have an anisotropic profile.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`It is therefore an object of the present invention to use a
`gas mixture of NH3 and NF3 or CF4 and 02 mixed with H2
`and N2 to provide an improved means for selectively etching
`silicon dioxide.
`
`Another object of this invention is to provide a means for
`etching vias and trenches in SiO2 with a high degree of
`anisotropy.
`According to the invention, SiO2 is selectively etched
`from a substrate using a plasma created from NH3 and NF3
`gases, the substrate being located in an etch chamber where
`the plasma is formed. The creation of the NH3 and NF3
`plasma within the etch chamber provides for enhanced
`directional etching capabilities and results in improved
`anisotropic etching of $0,. A field source is used to
`generate an electric field within the chamber and to excite
`the plasma. The creation of a negative charge at the bottom
`of the chamber forces the positive radicals in the downward
`direction towards the substrate. A passivation layer of
`ammonium hexafluorosilicate (AHFS) will be formed at the
`point where the plasma contacts exposed Si02. The lapse of
`a sufficient amount of time for the reaction allows the
`passivation layer to extend to the Si or silicon nitride etch
`stop layer. If desired, the passivation layer can be removed
`by either heating the passivation layer at a temperature
`greater than 100° C. or by rinsing the passivation layer with
`deionized water. The removal of the ammonium hexafluo-
`rosilicate passivation layer results in anisotropic trenches
`and vias in the SiOz. It is also possible to leave the layer of
`AHFS in place and use this method for epitaxial growth
`pre—treatment or other process steps requiring an oxide free
`surface.
`
`Furthermore, the use of the combination of NH3 and NF3
`gases, as is disclosed in this application, provides a means
`for achieving the non-selective etching of dilferent types of
`oxides, such as oxides deposited by TEOS, or by chemical
`vapor and doped oxides, such as phosphosilicate glass
`(PSG), thereby allowing a thermal oxide to be etched at
`approximately the same rate as a deposited oxide.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`The foregoing and other objects, aspects and advantages
`will be better understood from the following detailed
`description of a preferred embodiment of the invention with
`reference to the drawings, in which:
`FIG. 1A illustrates the prior art etch chamber as disclosed
`in US. Pat. No. 5,030,319 to Nishino et al.;
`
`

`

`5,505,816
`
`3
`FIG. 1B is a schematic drawing of the etch chamber of the
`present invention;
`FIG. 2A depicts a substrate with a silicon dioxide layer;
`FIG. ZB illustrates isotropic etching of the substrate
`depicted in FIG. 2A when using the prior art technique and
`apparatus as depicted in FIG. 1A;
`FIG. 2C is a schematic drawing of anisotropic etching of
`the substrate depicted in FIG. 2A when using the technique
`and apparatus of this invention depicted in FIG. 1B;
`FIG. 3 is a graph which shows the respective etch rates of
`silicon dioxide, polysilicon and silicon nitride when exposed
`to a plasma of NH3 and NF3;
`FIGS. 4A, 4B and 4C are examples is an example of an
`XPS analysis which demonstrates the effective removal of
`native oxide achieved by the method of the present inven-
`tion; and
`FIGS. SA and 5B illustrate a selective silicon dioxide
`etch.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION
`
`Refening now to the drawings, and more particularly to
`FIG. 1B, the invention is directed to the selective etching of
`silicon dioxide, wherein a gaseous mixture of NH3 and NF3
`14 is formed in the chamber 16 where the substrate 18 is
`located. It is also possible to use the combination of CF4 and
`02 mixed with H2 and N2 as a substitute for the NH3 and
`NF3 gas mixture. This process is also shown to be non—
`selective with respect to the etching of different oxides. A
`power source 26 is used to create an electrical field within
`the chamber 16, thereby exciting the gaseous mixture of
`NH3 and NF3 to create a plasma of NH4F and similar
`radicals. The plasma created has fields within the plasma and
`a sheath above the substrate 18, thereby accelerating the
`ions, such as NH4+or any ion containing N, H or F, down-
`ward onto the substrate surface. The reaction of the radicals
`and ions with the SiO2 layer converts the layer to ammonium
`hexafluorosilicate (AI-IFS), (NH4)ZSiF6. If desired, as in a
`selective oxide etch application, the ammonium hexafluo-
`rosilicate can easily be removed by heating to a temperature
`of 100° C. or by rinsing with deionized water. This results
`in the release of NH3, HF and SiF4. However, it is also
`possible to leave the passivating product layer in place and
`use it as a pre—treatrnent for epitaxial growth or other process
`steps requiring an oxide free surface.
`FIG. 2A illustrates a substrate 52 with a SiO2 layer 50
`prior to the etching to the substrate. A resist pattern 54 has
`been created on the SiO2 layer 50 in preparation for selective
`etching.
`FIG. 2C illustrates the resulting product after it has been
`etched using the method and apparatus of this invention. As
`shown, an anisotropic product is created, with the silicon
`dioxide 50 being etched straight down to the substrate
`surface 56. The selective etching of the silicon dioxide
`results in the formation of straight walls 58 which do not
`extend beneath the desired resist pattern 54. The selective
`etching shown results from the directional control provided
`by exciting the NF3 and NH3 gas mixture within the etch
`chamber.
`
`The graph shown in FIG. 3, provides a comparison of the
`etch rates of silicon dioxide, silicon nitride and polysilicon
`and illustrates the variance in the etch rate over time. As can
`be interpreted from this graph, a selectivity of greater than
`fifty (50) for silicon dioxide over polysilicon and of greater
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`than five (5) for silicon dioxide over silicon nitride have
`been achieved.
`The effective removal of a native oxide has been demon—
`strated using XPS analysis, with an example of the results
`shown in FIG. 4. The initial surface of the substrate was
`cleaned using the RCA or Huang process and the substrate
`was characterized as containing silicon, oxygen, fluorine and
`nitrogen in the respective ratio of 58.72:37.56:0.49:0. The
`oxygen peak 70 is characteristic of silicon dioxide. Follow-
`ing the reaction of the NH4F+with the SiO2 layer, the ratio
`of Si, O, F, and N in the surface was 27.66:2.96:48.46:9.44,
`respectively. After the removal of the AHFS by baking or
`rinsing, the surface contained Si, O, F and N in the ratio of
`68.51:6.08:3.94;1.03. This graph shows an oxygen peak
`which is characteristic of subsurface oxygen.
`FIGS. 5A and 5B further illustrate the selective etching
`effect of this invention. FIG. 5A illustrates a substrate 100
`with deposits of silicon nitride (SiN4) 102 and polysilicon
`(Si) 104 and a film of silicon dioxide (SiOZ). The ions supply
`energy to the surfaces which are parallel to the sheaths thus
`causing the reaction to be anisotropic.
`FIG. 5B shows the substrate after it has been etched. The
`charged particles etch the substrate in only one direction.
`The exposed surface of SiO2 has been etched down to
`substrate surface 112. In addition, the SiO2 has been etched
`to the surface of the polysilicon 104. Furthermore, walls 108
`and 110, respectively beneath Si3N4 102 and polysilicon 104
`have not been undercut during the etch process. The process
`disclosed in this invention etches only the SiO2 which is
`exposed on the upper surface of the substrate.
`The selective etching of the silicon dioxide with respect to
`silicon and silicon nitride, using the direct activation tech-
`nique discussed supra, also provides a means whereby a
`thermal oxide is non—selectively etched with respect to a
`deposited oxide. This method has produced the etch rates of
`50 for thermal oxide, 60 for PECVD TEOS oxide and 56
`PECVD PSG relative to the etch rate of polysilicon. The
`consistency of the etch rates among these different types of
`oxides is desirable.
`While the invention has been described in terms of its
`preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recog-
`nize that the invention can be practiced with modification
`within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
`Having thus described our invention, what we claim as
`new and desire to secure by Letters Patent is as follows:
`1. A method of producing a silicon dioxide free surface,
`comprising the steps of:
`placing a substrate with a silicon dioxide layer in a
`chamber, said substrate including an etch stop layer
`which is selected from the grOup consisting of silicon
`nitride and polysilicon;
`generating a plasma of reactive radicals from a gas
`mixture, said generating occurring in said chamber; and
`exposing said silicon dioxide layer on said substrate to
`said plasma for a suflicient length of time wherein a
`portion of said silicon dioxide layer forms product
`layers
`containing
`ammonium hexafluorosilicate
`whereby said step of generating said plasma in said
`chamber produces enhanced etching anisotropy during
`said step of exposing in comparison to exposing said
`substrate to a plasma generated remotely from said
`chamber, and wherein said silicon nitride and polysili-
`con layers are substantially afiected than said oxide
`layer.
`2. A method of etching an oxide layer, comprising the
`steps of:
`
`

`

`_ 5,505,816
`
`5
`forming an oxide layer on a substrate;
`positioning said substrate within a chamber;
`generating, in said chamber, a plasma of reactive radicals
`from a gas mixture selected from the group consisting
`of the combination of NH3 and NF3 and the combina—
`tion of CF4, 02, H2 and N2;
`exposing said oxide layer to said plasma for an amount of
`time to form a removable product layer, said step of
`exposing being performed independent of a process
`used in said forming step and proceeding at the same
`rate for oxide layers formed by difierent processes
`during said forming step.
`3. A method, as recited in claim 2, wherein said step of
`forming is performed by a process selected from the group
`consisting of thermally growing oxides and depositing tet-
`raorthosilicate oxide and depositing phosphosilicate glass.
`4. A method, as recited in claim 2, further comprising the
`step of removing said removable product layer.
`5. A method, as recited in claim 4, wherein said step of
`removing said product layers includes baking at a tempera-
`ture greater than 100° C.
`6. A method, as recited in claim 4, wherein said step of
`removing said product layers includes rinsing in water.
`7. A method of non-selectively etching silicon dioxides,
`comprising the step of:
`exposing a substrate with at least two different oxide types
`to reactive radicals, said oxide types being selected
`from the group consisting of thermal oxides and depos—
`ited oxides, whereby said exposing consumes said
`oxide types at a substantially equal rate, the consumed
`oxides forming product layers.
`8. A method of non-selectively etching oxides, compris-
`ing the step of:
`exposing a substrate with at least two different oxide types
`to reactive radicals, said oxide types being selected
`from the group consisting of thermal oxides and depos-
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`6
`ited oxides, whereby said exposing consumes said
`oxide types at a substantially equal rate, the consumed
`oxides forming product layers, and wherein said reac-
`tive radicals are formed by exciting a gas mixture
`selected from the group consisting of the combination
`of NH3 and NF3 and the combination of CF4, 02, H2
`and N2, whereby said exposing consumes said oxide
`types at a substantially equal rate, the consumed oxides
`forming product layers.
`9. A method of non-selectively etching oxides, compris-
`ing the steps of:
`exposing a substrate with at least two difierent oxide types
`to reactive radicals, said oxide types being selected
`from the group consisting of thermal oxides and depos—
`ited oxides, whereby said exposing consumes said
`oxide types at a substantially equal rate, the consumed
`oxides forming product layers; and
`removing said product layers.
`10. A method, as recited in claim 9, wherein said step of
`removing said product layers includes rinsing in water.
`11. A method, as recited in claim 9, wherein said step of
`removing said product layers includes baking at a tempera—
`ture greater than 100° C.
`12. A method, as recited in claim 8, further comprising the
`step of removing said product layers.
`13. A method, as recited in claim 12, wherein said step of
`removing said product layers includes baking at a tempera—
`ture greater than 1000 C.
`14. A method, as recited in claim 12, wherein said step of
`removing said product layers includes rinsing in water.
`15. A method, as recited in claim 7, further comprising the
`step of removing said product layers.
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket