throbber
by E. P. Gusev
`H.-C. Lu
`E. L. Garfunkel
`T. Gustafsson
`M. L. Green
`
`Growth and
`characterization
`of ultrathin
`nitrided silicon
`oxide films
`
`This paper reviews recent progress in
`understanding microstructural and growth-
`mechanistic aspects of ultrathin (<4 nm)
`oxynitride films for gate dielectric applications.
`Different techniques for characterizing these
`films are summarized. We discuss several
`nitridation methods, including thermal
`(oxy)nitridation in NO, N2O, and N2 as well as a
`variety of deposition methods. We show that a
`basic understanding of the gas-phase and
`thin-film oxygen and nitrogen incorporation
`chemistries facilitates the processing of
`layered oxynitride nanostructures with
`desirable electrical properties.
`
`1. Introduction
`While “pure” SiO2 films remained the principal material
`for gate dielectrics in MIS-based structures for more
`than three decades, the use of the traditional SiO2 gate
`dielectric has become questionable for sub-0.25-␮m ULSI
`devices [1–5]. Increasing problems with dopant (boron)
`penetration through ultrathin SiO2 layers and direct
`tunneling for ultrathin (⬍2 nm) oxide films dictate the
`search for and aggressive exploration of new materials for
`future gate dielectric applications with better diffusion
`barrier properties and higher dielectric constants [6, 7]. At
`
`this time, ultrathin silicon oxynitrides (SiOxNy or,
`more accurately, nitrogen-doped SiO2) are the leading
`candidates to replace pure SiO2 [8 –24]. Oxynitrides exhibit
`several properties superior to those of conventional
`thermal O2 oxides (SiO2), the more important being
`suppression of boron penetration from the poly-Si gate
`and enhanced reliability. Nitrogen also reduces hot-
`electron-induced degradation [25]. The dielectric constant
`of the oxynitride increases linearly with the percentage of
`nitrogen from ␧(SiO2) ⫽ 3.8 to ␧(Si3N4) ⫽ 7.8 [26, 27],
`though one should note that most SiOxNy films grown
`currently by thermal methods are lightly “doped” with N
`(⬍10 at.%) and therefore have a dielectric constant only
`slightly higher than that of pure SiO2.
`Recent publications suggest that the performance of
`CMOS-based devices depends on both the concentration
`and distribution of the nitrogen atoms incorporated into
`the gate dielectric [14, 16, 18, 28 –30]. For example,
`excessive nitrogen at the interface may reduce peak carrier
`mobility in the channel of MOSFETs and may allow boron
`accumulation in the oxide, which, in turn, may result in
`device instabilities [28]. The optimal nitrogen profile is
`determined by its specific application, although our
`incomplete understanding of the atomic-scale structural
`and electronic properties of dielectrics makes the desired
`structure an imperfectly defined goal. One possibility is
`an SiOxNy film with two nitrogen-enhanced layers: first,
`
`娀Copyright 1999 by International Business Machines Corporation. Copying in printed form for private use is permitted without payment of royalty provided that (1) each
`reproduction is done without alteration and (2) the Journal reference and IBM copyright notice are included on the first page. The title and abstract, but no other portions,
`of this paper may be copied or distributed royalty free without further permission by computer-based and other information-service systems. Permission to republish any other
`portion of this paper must be obtained from the Editor.
`
`265
`
`0018-8646/99/$5.00 © 1999 IBM
`
`IBM J. RES. DEVELOP. VOL. 43 NO. 3 MAY 1999
`
`E. P. GUSEV ET AL.
`
`TSMC 1120
`
`

`

`nitrogen at or near the Si/SiO2 interface to improve hot-
`electron immunity, and second, an even higher nitrogen
`concentration at the SiO2/polysilicon interface, as this is
`where it can best be used to minimize the penetration of
`boron from the heavily doped gate electrode [29]. The
`boron flux can be quite large (depending upon the thermal
`budget) and, therefore, higher nitrogen concentrations at
`the poly-Si interface are needed [28]. Although the actual
`“ideal” amounts of nitrogen required at each interface are
`not known, typical interfacial contents are of the order of
`(0.5–1) ⫻ 1015 cm⫺2 near each interface. The best methods
`to produce the desired ultrathin SiOxNy films are still
`under debate.
`Nitrogen may be incorporated into SiO2 using either
`thermal oxidation/annealing [8, 9, 12–14, 31–39] or
`chemical and physical deposition [15, 16, 18, 19, 40, 41]
`methods (Figure 1). Thermal nitridation of SiO2 in NO or
`N2O generally results in a relatively low concentration of
`nitrogen in the films, of the order of 1015 N/cm2 [20, 29,
`33, 42]. Since nitrogen content increases with temperature,
`thermal oxynitridation is typically performed at high
`temperatures, i.e., ⬎800⬚C [20, 29, 33, 42]. For more heavily
`N-doped SiOxNy films, other deposition methods, such as
`chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [40] with different
`precursors and its low-pressure (LP) and/or rapid thermal
`(RT) variants [18], jet vapor deposition (JVD) [43],
`atomic layer deposition (ALD) [44], or nitridation by
`energetic nitrogen particles (plasma, N atoms, or ions)
`[45–55], can be used. These nitridation methods can be
`performed at lower temperatures, ⬃300 – 400⬚C. However,
`low-temperature deposition methods may result in
`nonequilibrium films, and subsequent thermal processing
`steps are often required to improve film quality and
`minimize defects and induced damage [19, 56]. Because
`
`the thermodynamics [57, 58] of the SiOxNy system and
`the kinetics [12, 20, 29, 32, 38, 59 – 63] of nitrogen
`incorporation are rather complex, these different methods
`produce oxynitride films with different total nitrogen
`concentrations and depth distributions. From a scientific
`viewpoint, the addition of N into the Si–O system opens a
`number of questions concerning microstructure, defects,
`and growth mechanisms, issues which are still under
`intense debate even for the much simpler “pure” SiO2/Si
`system [64 –71].
`Characterizing the nitrogen distribution in ultrathin
`films with the required sub-nm accuracy is an analytical
`challenge. Conventional depth profiling approaches,
`such as SIMS (secondary ion mass spectroscopy) [9, 14,
`18, 34, 72] and HF etch-back methods [12, 33, 35] [in
`combination with XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy),
`NRA (nuclear reaction analysis), etc.], offer limited depth
`resolution, especially for ultrathin dielectrics. In addition,
`SIMS analysis is complicated by matrix effects [73], while
`HF etching may introduce nonuniform oxide removal
`(especially in the presence of local nitrogen-rich regions)
`and other deleterious chemical effects. We have recently
`demonstrated [62, 63, 74 –76] that high-resolution
`(⌬E/E ⬇ 0.1%) medium-energy ion scattering (MEIS)
`[77] is a useful technique for accurately obtaining the
`depth distribution profile of nitrogen in 1– 4-nm oxynitride
`films with sub-nm accuracy.
`In this paper, we review our recent progress in 1)
`characterizing nitrogen depth profiles (by MEIS
`[42, 74, 76]) and bonding (by XPS [78]) of ultrathin SiOxNy
`films, and 2) understanding the mechanisms of nitrogen
`incorporation into ultrathin oxide films [42, 62, 63, 79, 80].
`We demonstrate how this basic knowledge can be used to
`guide nitrogen nanoengineering technology, in particular to
`
`E. P. GUSEV ET AL.
`
`IBM J. RES. DEVELOP. VOL. 43 NO. 3 MAY 1999
`
`266
`
`

`

`produce layered nitrogen structures [81]. A significant part
`of the paper is devoted to thermal oxynitridation of Si in
`NO and N2O. Other nitridation methods are also briefly
`discussed.
`
`2. Thermodynamics of the Si–N–O system
`The bulk phase diagram of the Si–N–O system is shown
`in Figure 2. The diagram consists of four phases: Si, SiO2
`(cristobolite, tridymite), Si3N4, and Si2N2O [57, 58]. The
`three compound phases have similar structural units: SiO4
`tetrahedra for SiO2, SiN4 tetrahedra for Si3N4, and slightly
`distorted SiN3O tetrahedra for Si2N2O, implying that the
`phases can be converted from SiO2 to Si2N2O and finally
`to Si3N4 by replacing oxygen with nitrogen. However, the
`nitride (Si3N4) and the oxide (SiO2) phases never coexist
`in the bulk under equilibrium conditions. They are always
`separated by the oxynitride (Si2N2O), which is the only
`thermodynamically stable and crystalline form of silicon
`oxynitride.
`A puzzling question is why nitrogen atoms are
`incorporated at all in SiO2. According to thermodynamic
`equilibrium, nitrogen should not incorporate into an SiO2
`film that is grown on Si in almost any partial pressure of
`oxygen, i.e., ⬎10⫺17 atm, depending upon temperature
`[57, 58]. One can see from Figure 2 that the Si2N2O/SiO2
`phase boundary exists at about 10⫺18 atm for T ⫽ 1400 K.
`At any oxygen partial pressure greater than that, which
`surely exists in a furnace or rapid thermal processing
`(RTP) reactor or, for example, during N2O or NO
`decomposition at high temperatures, only SiO2 phases
`(crystalline or amorphous) should form. Therefore,
`nitrogen in bulk SiO2 is not thermodynamically stable.
`At least two reasons for the presence of nitrogen in the
`SiO2 film can be suggested. First, nitrogen atoms may
`simply be kinetically trapped at the reaction zone near the
`interface (i.e., the nitrogen is present in a nonequilibrium
`state, where the rate of the transition to equilibrium is
`slow and some N is trapped) or by structural defects in
`the SiO2 film [82]. The basic idea in this model is that
`nitrogen brought into the film during oxynitridation (as,
`for example, NO; see below) reacts only with Si–Si bonds
`at or near the interface, not with Si–O bonds in the bulk
`of the SiO2 overlayer. Alternatively, the nitrogen at the
`interface may indeed be thermodynamically stable due
`to the presence of free-energy terms that are not yet
`understood. For example, nitrogen may lower the
`interfacial strain known to exist at the SiO2/Si interface.
`This could explain why incorporated nitrogen (especially
`in N2O or NO oxides) is often associated with the Si/SiO2
`interface, consistent with a special, stabilizing role of the
`nitrogen at the interface. Even when nitrogen is implanted
`into Si, it tends to migrate to the Si/SiO2 interface during
`oxidation and be incorporated in the SiO2 [83, 84].
`Therefore, there is some evidence that the nitrogen
`
`plays a specific role at the interface, but also that it is not
`stable away from it. On the other hand, nonequilibrium
`techniques (for example, plasma nitridation) have
`yielded oxynitrides with much higher concentrations of
`incorporated nitrogen (including top-surface nitridation
`[49]) than thermal oxynitridation methods (e.g., in NO,
`N2O, N2). This fact seems to be supportive of the “kinetic
`trapping” concept. Finally, we note that the favorable
`thermodynamics of the SiO2 phase discussed above may be
`the reason why Si3N4 films (produced by JVD or other
`methods) always contain some oxygen; of course,
`contamination by H2O, O2, etc. with a high sticking
`coefficient would also result in mixed oxide–nitride
`phases.
`
`3. Diffusion-barrier properties of nitrided layers
`An important property of nitrogen in nitrided oxides is
`that it forms a barrier against the diffusion of boron.
`Concurrent with this, it also lowers the diffusion rates
`for oxygen, nitric oxide, and other dopants, significantly
`slowing the rate of further oxidation or nitridation [21, 32,
`34, 63, 82, 85–90]. For example, for a 2-nm oxynitride
`with ⬃1 ML (monolayer) of nitrogen (6.8 ⫻ 1014 N/cm2)
`located near the interface, the rate of continued oxidation
`at 900⬚C decreases by at least a factor of 4 relative to the
`pure oxide. A reasonable argument can be made that the
`decrease in film growth rate (due to nitrogen) results from
`
`267
`
`IBM J. RES. DEVELOP. VOL. 43 NO. 3 MAY 1999
`
`E. P. GUSEV ET AL.
`
`

`

`been suggested [91]. For a 1.5-nm SiO2 film, the diffusivity
`at 900⬚C would increase by a factor of 24 as compared
`with 10-nm oxides. According to this model, the role
`of nitrogen is that the N atoms compete with B for
`occupation of the defect sites. The model was criticized by
`Ellis and Buhrman [92], who argued that 1) Si–O–N–O–Si
`structures, which should form after N passivation, are not
`observed in XPS; and 2) according to percolation theory,
`to fit the experimental data the peroxy defects should have
`an unreasonably high concentration (⬃40% of the Si–O–Si
`bonds). Ellis and Buhrman developed a model in which
`boron diffuses substitutionally for Si atoms, and the role
`of the Si–N bond is to impede substitution for that Si
`atom [92]. The model was incorporated into a Monte
`Carlo simulation and showed good agreement with
`experimental data.
`Another interesting aspect of the diffusion barrier
`property of nitrided layers is that silicon interstitials
`generated during the film growth reaction at the interface
`are blocked from diffusing into the oxide [93]. This
`results in an enhanced flux of the interstitials into the Si
`substrate, which in turn yields an increased density of
`oxidation stacking faults and may also affect oxidation-
`induced diffusion [93]. Finally, we note that other
`chemistries may play an important role both in film
`growth processes and in the more technically important
`issue, electrical defects that occur in the final devices.
`Hydrogen, water, and various other species quite
`possibly exist at finite concentrations [94]. For example,
`both fluorine and hydrogen enhance the boron diffusion
`rate [91]. Hydrogen may also play an important role in the
`diffusion/reaction processes during (oxy)nitride formation
`[40].
`
`4. Materials characterization of ultrathin
`nitrided oxides
`Two major problems in measuring nitrogen in SiOxNy films
`are the following: 1) In many cases the concentration of
`nitrogen in the film is rather low (as an example, in earlier
`studies of NO oxynitrides [95] it was claimed that the films
`are essentially SiO2 because the nitrogen was undetectable
`at that time); and 2) the films in question are very thin
`(⬍5 nm), suggesting that sub-nm depth resolution is
`required to monitor nitrogen depth profiles. Over the past
`few years, several techniques, such as secondary ion mass
`spectroscopy (SIMS) [18, 34, 72, 73, 78], nuclear reaction
`analysis (NRA) [29, 32, 33, 38, 59, 80, 96, 97], medium-
`energy ion scattering (MEIS) [39, 42, 62, 63, 74 –76, 80],
`X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) [12, 30, 34, 35,
`37, 48, 74, 78, 87, 98 –101], Auger electron spectroscopy
`(AES) [19], Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
`(FTIR) [102], spectroscopic ellipsometry [103], and others
`have been utilized to study nitrogen concentrations,
`depth profiles, nitrogen bonding, and microstructure of
`
`a decreased rate of diffusion. The density of nitrides and
`oxynitrides is higher than that of the pure oxide [40];
`thus, the diffusivity of NO, O2, N2, or other nonreactive
`molecular species such as noble gases should be lower in
`the nitrogen-containing films. However, another property
`involving N bonds may be equally important: The lattice
`itself may become more rigid on an atomic level. The
`three bonds connected to each nitrogen (as in Si3N4) are
`more constrained than the two bonds of each O atom in
`SiO2, where the Si–O–Si bond angles can go from 120⬚ to
`180⬚ with little change in energy; this may also contribute
`to a decrease in the ability of the nitrided lattice to
`permit diffusion of atoms and small molecules. The latter
`argument is valid for either an interstitial diffusion mode
`(of molecules), or an exchange-hopping substitutional
`mode (of excess atoms).
`By analogy, both physical (e.g., density) and chemical
`arguments have been used to explain the important effect
`of the reduced penetration rate of boron from the poly-Si
`gate into nitrided oxides. (Boron penetration causes
`threshold voltage shifts and degrades reliability.) To
`explain the “stopping power” of the nitrogen in oxides, a
`model assuming boron diffusion via peroxy linkage defects
`(Si–O–O–Si bonds), whose concentration changes under
`different processing conditions and film thicknesses, has
`
`268
`
`E. P. GUSEV ET AL.
`
`IBM J. RES. DEVELOP. VOL. 43 NO. 3 MAY 1999
`
`

`

`Table 1
`Selected nuclear reactions for oxynitride
`characterization.
`
`Target
`element
`
`Nuclear
`reaction
`
`Energy
`(keV)
`
`Sensitivity
`(atoms/cm2)
`
`H
`
`D
`14N
`15N
`15N
`
`16O
`18O
`18O
`
`28Si
`29Si
`
`30Si
`
`H(15N, ␣␥)12C
`D(3He, p)4He
`
`14N(d, ␣0,1)12C
`15N(p, ␣)12C
`15N(p, ␣␥)12C
`
`16O(d, p)17O
`18O(p, ␣)15N
`18O(p, ␣)15N
`
`28Si(p, ␥)29P
`29Si(p, ␥)30P
`
`30Si(p, ␥)31P
`
`6420
`
`700
`
`1100
`
`1000
`
`429
`
`850
`
`730
`
`151
`
`371
`
`324
`417
`
`499
`
`⬃1014
`⬃1012
`⬃5 ⫻ 1013
`⬃1012
`⬃1013
`(estimated)
`⬃1014
`⬃1012
`⬃1013
`(estimated)
`
`⬃1013
`(estimated)
`⬃1013
`(estimated)
`
`oxynitrided films. Below we outline the features and the
`utility of these techniques for ultrathin oxynitride studies.
`SIMS, a standard technique used in the industry
`to monitor concentration profiles in semiconductor
`structures, was one of the first methods applied to the
`nitrogen depth distribution problem in oxynitrided films.
`The technique has a rather high sensitivity (of the order
`of 0.001 at.%), can be performed rapidly, and shows good
`long-term reproducibility [73]. As an example, Figure 3
`illustrates nitrogen depth profiles for ⬃5-nm oxynitride
`films grown by thermal oxynitridation of Si(100) in N2O
`(both in a furnace and in an RTP reactor), and in O2
`followed by NO [74]. One can see different depth
`profiles depending on the processing conditions. The
`NO-annealed film has the highest concentration of
`nitrogen incorporated near the SiOxNy/Si interface. The
`RTN2O (rapid thermal oxynitridation) film also shows
`nitrogen located near the interface, whereas the furnace-
`grown film has a broader nitrogen depth distribution. Both
`N2O oxynitrides have nitrogen concentrations lower than
`the NO-annealed film. The technique begins to reach the
`limits of depth resolution (estimated to be ⬃2–3 nm) for
`sub-5-nm films. Another more important complication for
`SIMS analysis are “matrix effects,” in which the sputtered
`nitrogen ion yield depends strongly on the local film
`chemistry around the nitrogen. For example, the (CsN⫹)
`ion yield from nitrogen in bulk Si is about six times
`smaller than in SiO2, while that for N near the interface is
`about three times that observed in the bulk of the SiO2
`film [73]. The use of CsN⫹ ions as the detected species
`
`seems to minimize the matrix effect, since for negative
`ions matrix effects are even more severe. In most
`cases, SIMS analysis is also complicated by surface
`contamination and initial sputtering effects which make
`measurements of the nitrogen in the top (⬃1 nm) surface
`layers not very meaningful. Finally, one more metrological
`aspect of the SIMS analysis is that the N concentration
`shown for the interface peak (see Figure 3) may not
`be accurate due to ion mixing. The areal density of
`the N peak should be used instead. Reference samples
`(especially with different nitrogen distributions) calibrated
`by other quantitative methods (NRA, MEIS, etc.) may
`be helpful for more accurate quantitative SIMS analysis.
`NRA analysis of oxynitrides is based on the detection
`of protons, ␣-particles, and ␥-rays generated in nuclear
`reactions of nitrogen, oxygen, silicon, and hydrogen
`(deuterium) induced by high-energy charged particles
`(Table 1) [29, 32, 33, 38, 59, 80, 96, 97]. The cross sections
`for these reactions can be determined in independent
`calibration experiments, and the signal-to-background
`ratio is in many cases quite favorable. Since the nuclear
`reaction rates are sensitive only to the number of nuclei in
`the films, the technique yields absolute concentrations of
`the species investigated. In particular, the technique allows
`one to determine the absolute concentration of 14N
`with an accuracy of ⬃7–10% and a detection limit of
`
`⬃5 ⫻ 1013 atoms/cm2 via the reaction of 14N(d, ␣0,1)12C
`induced by 1.1-MeV deuterons. Figure 4 shows the nitrogen
`content (which is an increasing function of temperature)
`in oxynitride films grown by rapid thermal oxynitridation
`in N2O [33]. The oxygen content in the films can also be
`measured by NRA, for example by the 16O(d, p)17O
`
`269
`
`IBM J. RES. DEVELOP. VOL. 43 NO. 3 MAY 1999
`
`E. P. GUSEV ET AL.
`
`

`

`approximately 1-nm scale under favorable conditions.
`Depth profiling can also be performed by an HF
`acid etch-back with subsequent NRA measurement
`of N remaining in the film [13]. One more useful
`application of NRA is based on its ability to measure
`hydrogen/deuterium [H(15N, ␣␥)12C at 429 keV and
`D(3He, p)4He at 700 keV] since H/D is believed to be
`important in both the nitridation mechanism and device
`performance [105, 106]. Finally, we note that nitrogen,
`oxygen, silicon, and hydrogen can also be monitored by
`the technique of elastic recoil detection (ERD) of primary
`MeV ions [86].
`MEIS, another ion beam technique, is based on
`the same principles of ion–solid interactions as is
`conventional Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy
`(RBS) [77]. Because of the lower ion energy used in
`MEIS (typically 100 keV, at which the energy loss of
`protons in a solid is maximal), and the use of a high-
`resolution toroidal electrostatic ion energy analyzer [107]
`(⌬E/E ⬇ 0.1%), almost-monolayer depth resolution can
`be obtained [108, 109]. We have demonstrated that a
`0.3– 0.5-nm accuracy (near the top surface or for very thin
`films) in the nitrogen depth profiles can be achieved [42, 74].
`To our knowledge, this is the best depth resolution
`for nitrogen in SiOxNy films achieved so far. However,
`due to the statistical nature of the ion energy loss in the
`solid (straggling effect) [110], the resolution decreases
`with increasing distance from the surface. MEIS allows one
`to monitor simultaneously both absolute concentrations
`and depth profiles of N, O, and Si in the film. The
`detection limit of nitrogen in SiO2 is about 2–3 ⫻ 1014
`atoms/cm2, depending on the film thickness and the width
`of the nitrogen distribution in the film. It is worth noting
`that, in opposition to other depth-profiling techniques
`(e.g., SIMS), both the sensitivity to nitrogen and the
`depth resolution increase with decreasing dielectric film
`thickness. Another strength of MEIS is mass sensitivity,
`which enables isotopic (18O and 16O) labeling experiments
`[111, 112]. Light elements (for example, hydrogen
`and boron) can also be detected in the elastic recoil
`configuration, as demonstrated by Copel and Tromp
`[113, 114].
`Figure 5(a) shows a typical MEIS spectrum for an
`SiO2 film annealed in NO. Three peaks are seen in this
`spectrum, corresponding to nitrogen, oxygen, and silicon.
`The lighter mass (nitrogen) yields a peak at lower energy,
`as given by classical two-body scattering kinematics [77].
`The areas under the peaks (after corrections for the
`known cross sections) are proportional to the total
`amounts of oxygen and nitrogen in the film [77].
`Obviously, the amount of nitrogen is much smaller
`than that of oxygen. The shape of the nitrogen peak is
`determined by the depth distribution of nitrogen in the
`film. Because of energy loss arising from electronic
`
`reaction at 850 keV. This allows one to calculate the
`thickness of the films (provided that film density is
`known). An additional advantage of the NRA technique is
`the detection of nitrogen (15N) and oxygen (18O) isotopes
`with the help of the following reactions: 15N(p, ␣)12C at
`1000 keV, 18O(p, ␣)15N at 730 keV, and the resonant
`reactions of 15N(p, ␣␥)12C at 429 keV and 18O(p, ␣)15N at
`151 keV. Isotopic labeling has been proven to be a useful
`method to study mechanistic aspects (including nitrogen
`and oxygen transport) of silicon (oxy)nitridation [38, 59,
`97, 104]. Owing to the narrow resonances (with widths of
`120 and 100 eV, respectively), the latter two reactions
`can be used for depth profiling of 15N and 18O on an
`
`270
`
`E. P. GUSEV ET AL.
`
`IBM J. RES. DEVELOP. VOL. 43 NO. 3 MAY 1999
`
`

`

`excitations, protons backscattered from nitrogen atoms
`closer to the Si–SiOxNy interface have lower energy than
`those scattered off the atoms near the surface. Accurate
`depth distributions [Figure 5(b)] of Si, O, and N are
`deduced from simulations of energy spectra, as discussed
`in [111]. More details about the MEIS setup, data
`acquisition and analysis, and the isotopic labeling
`technique can be found elsewhere [74, 108, 111, 112,
`115–117].
`The above ion beam methods are unfortunately
`not capable of examining local nitrogen bonding in
`(oxy)nitrided films. Photoemission (XPS) is a common
`technique used to help determine local bonding
`configurations of atoms on a surface or in a thin film
`[68, 118 –121]. XPS analysis is based on the fact that
`the energies of the electronic core levels are altered by
`the local electronic configurations. The observed energy
`levels shift with changing local chemical environment (the
`so-called chemical shifts). Early XPS studies were limited
`to the detection of nitrogen at the interface of SiO2
`annealed in nitrogen [87, 98]. More recent high-resolution
`(including synchrotron-based) photoemission studies of
`core levels of nitrogen (N 1s) and silicon (Si 2p) atoms
`were useful in understanding nitrogen bonding and depth
`distribution (with HF etch-back or variable photoelectron
`takeoff angle methods) [35, 37, 78, 99, 122]. Depth
`analysis in XPS is determined by the escape depth of the
`N 1s or Si 2p photoelectrons, which are of the order of
`2–3.5 nm for conventional AlK␣ or MgK␣ X-ray sources.
`N 1s spectra for NO and N2O oxynitrides are shown in
`Figure 6 [78]. The nitrogen spectrum for the N2O-grown
`film has much lower intensity than that of the NO
`oxynitride, which indicates that an NO source is more
`effective in terms of nitrogen incorporation into the
`dielectric film. A second feature to point out is that the
`spectra for both NO and N2O oxynitrides have similar
`shapes (see inset), suggesting that the local bonding
`configurations of nitrogen in the two films are similar.
`A more detailed analysis of the N 1s peak shape shows
`that the peak is asymmetric and consists of at least two
`components [35, 78, 99]. The lower binding energy (BE)
`component at ⬃397.6 eV (calibrated with respect to the
`Si 2p peak at 99.2 eV) is located closer to the interface,
`while the higher BE component at 398.3–399.0 eV (the
`thicker the film, the higher the value) corresponds to
`nitrogen atoms located further into the overlayer film. The
`lower BE peak can be assigned to N atoms bonded to
`three Si atoms, as follows from the observation of an N 1s
`peak at ⬃397.6 eV from a reference Si3N4 film [35, 99].
`The shift of the higher BE component originates from
`both electrostatic (charging, core hole screening) and
`structural effects. The structural effects may include
`different bond length and bond angles in the “bulk” of
`the film and near the interface, strain near the interface,
`
`and/or second-neighbor effects (i.e., bonding/atoms in
`the shell of second neighbors near the interface may be
`different from those in the middle of the oxynitride film)
`[100]. N–O bonds are unlikely to be present at high
`concentration in the NO and N2O oxynitrides because the
`chemical shift of ⬃1.5 eV (relative to the N–Si bond)
`calculated recently [100] for this configuration is larger
`than any experimentally observed ones. Recent work by
`R. Opila and J. Chang demonstrated that nitrogen profiles
`obtained from angular resolved XPS were consistent with
`MEIS depth profiles. They also showed that for oxynitride
`films processed by plasma, metastable nitrogen states may
`be observed with binding energies greater than 400 eV.
`Finally, we note that XPS is also useful in obtaining
`film thickness [123] (from the ratio of Si 2p peaks
`corresponding to the film and Si substrate) and
`interface structure [30, 35, 68, 118, 121, 124] (from the
`concentration of Si1⫹, Si2⫹, and Si3⫹ suboxide states
`observed in the Si 2p spectrum). Recent XPS studies of
`the suboxide states in N2O oxynitrides were interpreted
`as giving evidence for a lower defect density at the
`SiOxNy/Si interface with respect to the SiO2/Si interface
`[35]. However, an opposite effect (i.e., an increased
`concentration of the Si1⫹ state and an unchanged
`concentration of the Si1⫹ and Si2⫹) has also been reported
`
`271
`
`IBM J. RES. DEVELOP. VOL. 43 NO. 3 MAY 1999
`
`E. P. GUSEV ET AL.
`
`

`

`and models [103]. A structural two-layer model of N2O
`oxynitride films with an ⬃1.4 –1.6-nm-thick Si2N2O phase
`near the interface was suggested to explain a shift of the
`main peak in the FTIR spectrum as a function of the
`thickness of the films [102]. Optical second-harmonic
`spectroscopy has been used to study strain at the interface
`[125, 126]. Roughness at the SiOxNy/Si interface was
`studied by X-ray diffraction. It was found that, for N2O
`oxynitrides, the (RMS) roughness is smaller than for pure
`SiO2 films and decreases with temperature [33].
`
`5. Thermal (oxy)nitridation methods
`
`● Nitrogen incorporation into ultrathin dielectrics by NO
`processing
`Oxidation of silicon and annealing of SiO2 in nitrous
`(N2O) or nitric (NO) oxides are the leading hydrogen-
`free processing methods for making nitrided oxides by
`conventional thermal routes [20, 21, 29]. Oxynitridation in
`N2O is particularly attractive because 1) it allows one to
`incorporate what appears to be an appropriate amount of
`nitrogen near the SiOxNy/Si interface (typically ⬃5 ⫻ 1014
`atoms/cm2); and 2) its processing similarity to O2 permits
`N2O to replace oxygen in oxidation reactors/furnaces.
`However, among other factors, oxynitridation in N2O is
`complicated by the fast gas-phase decomposition of the
`molecule into N2, O2, NO, and O at typical oxidation
`temperatures, 800 –1100⬚C (see the subsection on gas-
`phase N2O decomposition which follows). NO is now
`believed to be responsible for nitrogen incorporation into
`the film [21, 29, 31, 37, 60, 127, 128], suggesting that
`understanding oxynitridation in NO is a necessary step
`before considering more complex gases such as N2O.
`If NO is the main species responsible for nitrogen
`incorporation into the film, oxynitridation in pure NO
`should be considered for ultrathin dielectrics, especially
`in processes in which thermal budget and film thickness
`issues are crucial. Compared to N2O, oxynitridation in NO
`results in more nitrogen incorporation at equivalent
`temperatures [14, 34, 37, 74, 82]. In addition, NO
`oxynitrides exhibit lower leakage currents and interface
`defect densities, as well as improved electrical stress
`properties [14, 34]. However, channel mobility may be
`reduced if the nitrogen concentration near the interface
`is too high.
`Figure 7 shows the total amounts of oxygen and
`nitrogen in ultrathin films on Si(100) after exposure in NO
`for an hour in the temperature range of 700 –1000⬚C [42].
`As the temperature increases, the total amounts of both
`nitrogen and oxygen increase. One should also note that
`the ratio of nitrogen to oxygen in the film increases with
`increasing temperature (increasing by ⬃50% from 700 to
`1000⬚C). This was also observed during the initial stage of
`the interaction of NO with Si(111) at much lower pressure
`
`[30]. Another electron spectroscopy, AES, can also be
`used to measure nitrogen content in SiOxNy films and has
`been used effectively in studies of plasma-nitrided samples
`[19]. Though the AES sensitivity to nitrogen is similar to
`that of XPS, the interpretation of spectral features is
`usually more difficult than in XPS because the Auger
`electron emission process is more complex than
`photoemission.
`Finally we discuss some other techniques for
`characterizing nitrogen and SiOxNy film microstructure.
`The amount of nitrogen can be crudely estimated
`from oxidation kinetics measurements. Since nitrogen
`significantly retards transport/reactions in (oxy)nitrided
`films [32, 34], this simple method can be used to monitor
`the presence of nitrogen in the film and to compare
`its relative value in different samples. However,
`the retardation rate depends not only on the N concentration
`but also on the depth distribution. A given amount of N
`evenly distributed in the film would produce a diffusion
`barrier quite different from one in which the nitrogen
`distribution is sharply peaked, making quantitative analysis
`difficult. Spectroscopic (immersion) ellipsometry results on
`N2O- and NO-grown oxynitrides show an agreement with
`SIMS measurements, though one should keep in mind that
`ellipsometric analysis is very dependent on parameters
`
`272
`
`E. P. GUSEV ET AL.
`
`IBM J. RES. DEVELOP. VOL. 43 NO. 3 MAY 1999
`
`

`

`(10⫺6 Torr) [129]. In other words, the film becomes more
`nitride-like at higher temperatures. The fact that the
`concentration of nitrogen increases with temperature has
`an important implication for the (oxy)nitridation of silicon
`in N2O. It was observed that in the case of N2O, a higher
`(oxy)nitridation temperature also gives rise to a higher
`nitrogen content in the film (Figure 4); this was attributed
`to a higher percentage of NO in the product stream
`resulting from the N2O gas-phase decomposition at higher
`temperatures. Our results with NO as the only reactive gas
`clearly show that the solid-state chemistry is also important
`in the understanding of the inc

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket