`
`
`
`
`Paper No. ___
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`GODO KAISHA IP BRIDGE 1,
`Patent Owner.
`_____________
`
`Case Nos. IPR2017-018411
`Patent No. 7,893,501
`_____________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
`
`
`1 Case IPR2017-01842 has been consolidated with this proceeding.
`
`6090268.1
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Patent Owner submits the following
`
`objections to evidence served in connection with the Petition for Inter Partes
`
`Review filed on July 26, 2017. These objections are timely filed and served within
`
`ten business days of the institution of the trial in this matter.
`
`I.
`
`EXHIBITS FROM IPR2017-01841
`
`Patent Owner objects to each of Exhibits 1008, 1010, 1011, 1014, and 1015
`
`for the following reasons:
`
` Petitioner objects under Fed. R. Evid. 901 as Petitioner has failed to
`
`authenticate the exhibits; more specifically, Petitioner has failed to
`
`establish that the exhibits are what Petitioner says they are, and has
`
`failed to establish the date by which the exhibits were published;
`
` To the extent Petitioner attempts to rely on the copyright date or other
`
`date identified in any of the exhibits to establish the publication date,
`
`the copyright date or other date is hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and
`
`the exhibit is inadmissible under Fed. R. Evid. 802;
`
` Due to the above deficiencies, Petitioner has failed to establish that
`
`the exhibits are relevant under Fed. R. Evid. 401, and therefore the
`
`exhibits are inadmissible under Fed. R. Evid. 402.
`
`Patent Owner likewise objects to any portion of the Petition and the
`
`Shanfield Declaration (Exhibit 1002) purporting to rely on these exhibits.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`II. EXHIBITS FROM IPR2017-01842
`Patent Owner objects to each of Exhibits 1106, 1110, 1111, 1115, 1116,
`
`1117, 1119, 1120, 1121, 1126, 1127, and 1128 for the following reasons:
`
` Petitioner objects under Fed. R. Evid. 901 as Petitioner has failed to
`
`authenticate the exhibits; more specifically, Petitioner has failed to
`
`establish that the exhibits are what Petitioner says they are, and has
`
`failed to establish the date by which the exhibits were published;
`
` To the extent Petitioner attempts to rely on the copyright date or other
`
`date identified in any of the exhibits to establish the publication date,
`
`the copyright date or other date is hearsay under Fed. R. Evid. 801 and
`
`the exhibit is inadmissible under Fed. R. Evid. 802;
`
` Due to the above deficiencies, Petitioner has failed to establish that
`
`the exhibits are relevant under Fed. R. Evid. 401, and therefore the
`
`exhibits are inadmissible under Fed. R. Evid. 402.
`
`Patent Owner likewise objects to any portion of the Petition and the
`
`Shanfield Declaration (Exhibit 1102) purporting to rely on these exhibits.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: 2/20/2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
`
`
`
`By /s Gerald B. Hrycyszyn /
`Gerald B. Hrycyszyn, Registration No. 50,474
`Richard F. Giunta, Registration No. 36,149
`Edmund J. Walsh, Registration No. 32,950
`WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Ave.
`Boston, MA 02210-2206
`Tel: 617-646-8000/Fax: 617-646-8646
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6 (e)(4)
`
`I certify that on February 20, 2018, I will cause a copy of the foregoing
`
`document, including any exhibits or appendices referred to therein, to be served via
`
`electronic mail, as previously consented to by Petitioner, upon the following:
`
`David L. Cavanaugh
`Dominic E. Massa
`Michael H. Smith
`
`David.Cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com
`Dominic.Massa@wilmerhale.com
`MichaelH.Smith@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`
`Date: February 20, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s Lisa Woodbury/
`Lisa Woodbury
`Litigation Paralegal
`WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`
`
`
`4
`
`