throbber
Case 2:16-cv-00745 Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-745
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`




`
`§§
`
`






`
`UNILOC USA, INC. and
`UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`UBISOFT, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiffs, Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. (together “Uniloc”), as and
`
`for their complaint against defendant, Ubisoft, Inc. (“Ubisoft”), allege as follows:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Uniloc USA, Inc. (“Uniloc USA”) is a Texas corporation having a principal place
`
`of business at Legacy Town Center I, Suite 380, 7160 Dallas Parkway, Plano Texas 75024.
`
`Uniloc also maintains a place of business at 102 N. College, Suite 603, Tyler, Texas 75702.
`
`2.
`
`Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. (“Uniloc Luxembourg”) is a Luxembourg public limited
`
`liability company having a principal place of business at 15, Rue Edward Steichen, 4th Floor, L-
`
`2540, Luxembourg (R.C.S. Luxembourg B159161).
`
`3.
`
`Uniloc Luxembourg owns a number of patents in the field of application
`
`management in a computer network.
`
`4.
`
`Upon information and belief, Ubisoft is a California corporation having a
`
`principal place of business in San Francisco, California and offering its products, including those
`
`IPR2017-01839
`Ubisoft, et al. EX1011 Page 1
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00745 Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 2 of 15 PageID #: 2
`
`accused herein of infringement, to customers and/or potential customers located in Texas and in
`
`the judicial Eastern District of Texas. Ubisoft may be served with process through its registered
`
`agent: Stephen Smith, 1900 Avenue of the Stars, 21st Floor, Los Angeles, California 90067.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`5.
`
`Uniloc brings this action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, 35 U.S.C. § 271 et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a) and 1367.
`
`6.
`
`Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(c) and
`
`1400(b). Upon information and belief, Ubisoft is deemed to reside in this judicial district, has
`
`committed acts of infringement in this judicial district, and/or has purposely transacted business
`
`involving the accused products in this judicial district, including sales to one or more customers
`
`in Texas.
`
`7.
`
`Ubisoft is subject to this Court’s jurisdiction pursuant to due process and/or the
`
`Texas Long Arm Statute due at least to its substantial business in this State and judicial district,
`
`including: (A) at least part of its past infringing activities, (B) regularly doing or soliciting
`
`business in Texas and/or (C) engaging in persistent conduct and/or deriving substantial revenue
`
`from goods and services provided to customers in Texas.
`
`COUNT I
`(INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,324,578)
`
`Uniloc incorporates paragraphs 1-7 above by reference.
`
`Uniloc Luxembourg is the owner, by assignment, of U.S. Patent No. 6,324,578
`
`
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`(“the ’578 Patent”), entitled METHODS, SYSTEMS AND COMPUTER PROGRAM
`
`PRODUCTS FOR MANAGEMENT OF CONFIGURABLE APPLICATION PROGRAMS ON
`
`IPR2017-01839
`Ubisoft, et al. EX1011 Page 2
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00745 Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 3 of 15 PageID #: 3
`
`A NETWORK that issued on November 27, 2001. A true and correct copy of the ’578 Patent is
`
`attached as Exhibit A hereto.
`
`10.
`
`Uniloc USA is the exclusive licensee of the ’578 Patent with ownership of all
`
`substantial rights therein, including the right to grant sublicenses, to exclude others, and to
`
`enforce, sue and recover past damages for the infringement thereof.
`
`11.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following describes, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay game portal works:
`
`12.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following describes, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay game portal works:
`
`
`
`13.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following describes, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay game portal works:
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01839
`Ubisoft, et al. EX1011 Page 3
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00745 Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 4 of 15 PageID #: 4
`
`14.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following describes, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay game portal works:
`
`
`
`15.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following describes, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay game portal works:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01839
`Ubisoft, et al. EX1011 Page 4
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00745 Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 5 of 15 PageID #: 5
`
`16.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following describes, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay game portal works:
`
`17.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following describes, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay game portal works:
`
`
`
`18.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following describes, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay game portal works:
`
`
`
`19.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following describes, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay game portal works:
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01839
`Ubisoft, et al. EX1011 Page 5
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00745 Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 6 of 15 PageID #: 6
`
`20.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following describes, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay game portal works
`
`
`
`21.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following describes, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay game portal works:
`
`
`
`22.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following describes, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay game portal works:
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01839
`Ubisoft, et al. EX1011 Page 6
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00745 Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 7 of 15 PageID #: 7
`
`23.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following describes, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay game portal works:
`
`
`
`24.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following describes, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay game portal works:
`
`
`
`25.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following describes, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay game portal works:
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01839
`Ubisoft, et al. EX1011 Page 7
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00745 Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 8 of 15 PageID #: 8
`
`26.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following describes, at least in part, how
`
`
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay game portal works
`
`27.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following describes, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay game portal works:
`
`
`
`28.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following describes, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay game portal works:
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01839
`Ubisoft, et al. EX1011 Page 8
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00745 Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 9 of 15 PageID #: 9
`
`
`
`
`
`29.
`
`Ubisoft has directly infringed, and continues to directly infringe one or more
`
`claims of the ’578 Patent in this judicial district and elsewhere in Texas, including at least claims
`
`1, 6-8, 11, 13, 22-24, 27, 32, 37-39 and 42-43 literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents,
`
`by or through making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling its Uplay games portal
`
`during the pendency of the ’578 Patent which software and associated backend server
`
`architecture inter alia allows for installing application programs having a plurality of
`
`configurable preferences and authorized users on a network, distributing an application launcher
`
`program to a user, the user obtaining a set of configurable preferences, obtaining an
`
`administrator set of configurable preferences and executing the application program using the
`
`user and administrator sets of configurable preferences responsive to a request from a user.
`
`30.
`
`In addition, should Ubisoft’s Uplay games portal be found to not literally infringe
`
`the asserted claims of the ’578 Patent, Ubisoft’s accused product would nevertheless infringe the
`
`asserted claims of the ’578 Patent. More specifically, the accused software/system performs
`
`substantially
`
`the
`
`same
`
`function
`
`(making
`
`computer games
`
`available
`
`for digital
`
`download/management), in substantially the same way (via a client/server environment), to yield
`
`substantially the same result (distributing application programs to a target on-demand server on a
`
`network). Ubisoft would thus be liable for direct infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.
`
`IPR2017-01839
`Ubisoft, et al. EX1011 Page 9
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00745 Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 10 of 15 PageID #: 10
`
`31.
`
`Ubisoft has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe at least claims
`
`1, 6-8, 11, 13, 22-24, 27, 32, 37-39 and 42-43 of the ’578 Patent in this judicial district and
`
`elsewhere in the United States by, among other things, actively inducing the using, offering for
`
`sale, selling, or importing the Uplay games portal. Ubisoft’s customers who possess the Uplay
`
`games portal and use such application in accordance with Ubisoft’s instructions directly infringe
`
`one or more of the forgoing claims of the ’578 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271. Ubisoft
`
`directly and/or indirectly instructs its customers through training videos, demonstrations,
`
`brochures, installation and/or user guides, such as those located at the following:
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`https://uplay.ubi.com
`
`https://club.ubi.com
`
`https://account-ubi.com
`
`www.youtube.com
`
`Ubisoft is thereby liable for infringement of the ’578 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
`
`32.
`
`Ubisoft has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe at least claims
`
`1, 6-8, 11, 13, 22-24, 27, 32, 37-39 and 42-43 of the ’578 Patent in this judicial district and
`
`elsewhere in the United States by, among other things, contributing to the direct infringement by
`
`others including, without limitation customers using the Uplay games portal, by making, offering
`
`to sell, selling and/or importing into the United States, a component of a patented machine,
`
`manufacture or combination, or an apparatus for use in practicing a patented process,
`
`constituting a material part of the invention, knowing the same to be especially made or
`
`especially adapted for use in infringing the ’578 Patent and not a staple article or commodity of
`
`commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
`
`IPR2017-01839
`Ubisoft, et al. EX1011 Page 10
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00745 Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 11 of 15 PageID #: 11
`
`33.
`
`For example, the Uplay games portal is a component of a patented machine,
`
`manufacture, or combination, or an apparatus for use in practicing a patent process.
`
`Furthermore, the Uplay games portal is a material part of the claimed inventions and upon
`
`information and belief is not a staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial
`
`non-infringing use. Ubisoft is, therefore, liable for infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(c).
`
`34.
`
`Ubisoft will have been on notice of the ’578 Patent since, at the latest, the service
`
`of this complaint upon Salesforce. By the time of trial, Ubisoft will have known and intended
`
`(since receiving such notice) that its continued actions would actively induce, and contribute to,
`
`the infringement of one or more of claims 1, 6-8, 11, 13, 22-24, 27, 32, 37-39 and 42-43 of the
`
`’578 Patent.
`
`35.
`
`Ubisoft may have infringed the ’578 Patent through other software utilizing the
`
`same or reasonably similar functionality, including other versions of its Uplay games portal
`
`software delivery system. Uniloc reserves the right to discover and pursue all such additional
`
`infringing software.
`
`36.
`
`Uniloc has been damaged, reparably and irreparably, by Ubisoft’s infringement of
`
`the ’578 Patent and such damage will continue unless and until Ubisoft is enjoined.
`
`COUNT II
`(INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,069,293)
`
`Uniloc incorporates paragraphs 1-36 above by reference.
`
`Uniloc Luxembourg is the owner, by assignment, of U.S. Patent No. 7,069,293
`
`
`
`37.
`
`38.
`
`(“the ’293 Patent”), entitled METHODS, SYSTEMS AND COMPUTER PROGRAM
`
`PRODUCTS FOR DISTRIBUTION OF APPLICATION PROGRAMS TO A TARGET
`
`STATION ON A NETWORK that issued on June 27, 2006. A true and correct copy of the ’293
`
`Patent is attached as Exhibit B hereto.
`
`IPR2017-01839
`Ubisoft, et al. EX1011 Page 11
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00745 Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 12 of 15 PageID #: 12
`
`39.
`
`Uniloc USA is the exclusive licensee of the ’293 Patent with ownership of all
`
`substantial rights therein, including the right to grant sublicenses, to exclude others, and to
`
`enforce, sue and recover past damages for the infringement thereof.
`
`40.
`
`Ubisoft has directly infringed, and continues to directly infringe one or more
`
`claims of the ’293 Patent in this judicial district and elsewhere in Texas, including at least claims
`
`1, 12 and 17, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by or through making, using,
`
`importing, offering for sale and/or selling its Uplay games portal during the pendency of the ’293
`
`Patent which software and associated backend server architecture inter alia allow for providing
`
`an application program for distribution to a network server, specifying source and target
`
`directories for the program to be distributed, preparing a file packet associated with the program
`
`including a segment configured to initiate registration and distributing the file packet to the target
`
`on-demand server to make the program available for use by a client user.
`
`41.
`
`In addition, should Ubisoft’s Uplay games portal be found to not literally infringe
`
`the asserted claims of the ’293 Patent, Ubisoft’s accused product would nevertheless infringe the
`
`asserted claims of the ’293 Patent. More specifically, the accused Uplay games portal performs
`
`substantially the same function (distributing application programs to a target on-demand server
`
`on a network), in substantially the same way (via a client/server environment to target on-
`
`demand users), to yield substantially the same result (making application programs available for
`
`use by target on-demand users). Ubisoft would thus be liable for direct infringement under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents.
`
`42.
`
`Ubisoft has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe at least claims
`
`1, 12 and 17 of the ’293 Patent in this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States by,
`
`among other things, actively inducing the using, offering for sale, selling, or importing the Uplay
`
`IPR2017-01839
`Ubisoft, et al. EX1011 Page 12
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00745 Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 13 of 15 PageID #: 13
`
`games portal. Ubisoft’s customers who possess the Uplay games portal and use such application
`
`in accordance with Ubisoft’s instructions directly infringe one or more of the forgoing claims of
`
`the ’293 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271. Ubisoft directly and/or indirectly instructs its
`
`customers through training videos, demonstrations, brochures, installation and/or user guides,
`
`such as those located at the following:
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`https://uplay.ubi.com
`
`https://club.ubi.com
`
`https://account-ubi.com
`
`www.youtube.com
`
`Ubisoft is thereby liable for infringement of the ’293 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
`
`43.
`
`Ubisoft has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe at least claims
`
`1, 12 and 17 of the ’293 Patent in this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States by,
`
`among other things, contributing to the direct infringement by others including, without
`
`limitation customers using the Uplay games portal, by making, offering to sell, selling and/or
`
`importing into the United States, a component of a patented machine, manufacture or
`
`combination, or an apparatus for use in practicing a patented process, constituting a material part
`
`of the invention, knowing the same to be especially made or especially adapted for use in
`
`infringing the ’293 Patent and not a staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for
`
`substantial non-infringing use.
`
`44.
`
`For example, the Uplay games portal is a component of a patented machine,
`
`manufacture, or combination, or an apparatus for use in practicing a patent process.
`
`Furthermore, the Uplay games portal is a material part of the claimed inventions and upon
`
`IPR2017-01839
`Ubisoft, et al. EX1011 Page 13
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00745 Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 14 of 15 PageID #: 14
`
`information and belief is not a staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial
`
`non-infringing use. Ubisoft is, therefore, liable for infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(c).
`
`45.
`
`Ubisoft will have been on notice of the ’293 Patent since, at the latest, the service
`
`of this complaint upon Salesforce. By the time of trial, Ubisoft will have known and intended
`
`(since receiving such notice) that its continued actions would actively induce, and contribute to,
`
`the infringement of one or more of claims 1, 12 and 17 of the ’293 Patent.
`
`46.
`
`Ubisoft may have infringed the ’293 Patent through other software utilizing the
`
`same or reasonably similar functionality, including other versions of its Uplay games portal.
`
`Uniloc reserves the right to discover and pursue all such additional infringing software.
`
`47.
`
`Uniloc has been damaged, reparably and irreparably, by Ubisoft’s infringement of
`
`the ’293 Patent and such damage will continue unless and until Ubisoft is enjoined.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Uniloc requests that the Court enter judgment against Ubisoft as follows:
`
`(A)
`
`(B)
`
`that Ubisoft has infringed the ’578 Patent and the ’293 Patent;
`
`awarding Uniloc its damages suffered as a result of Ubisoft’s infringement of the
`
`’578 Patent and the ’293 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284;
`
`
`
`(C)
`
`enjoining Ubisoft, its officers, directors, agents, servants, affiliates, employees,
`
`divisions, branches, subsidiaries and parents, and all others acting in concert or privity with it
`
`from infringing the ’578 Patent and the ’293 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283;
`
`
`
`
`
`(D)
`
`(E)
`
`proper.
`
`
`
`awarding Uniloc its costs, attorneys’ fees, expenses and interest, and
`
`granting Uniloc such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01839
`Ubisoft, et al. EX1011 Page 14
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00745 Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 15 of 15 PageID #: 15
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`Uniloc hereby demands trial by jury on all issues so triable pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 38.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`Dated: July 8, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Craig Tadlock
`Craig Tadlock
`Texas State Bar No. 00791766
`Keith Smiley
`Texas State Bar No. 24067869
`TADLOCK LAW FIRM PLLC
`2701 Dallas Parkway, Suite 360
`Plano, TX 75093
`Tel: (903) 730-6789
`Email: craig@tadlocklawfirm.com
`Email: keith@tadlocklawfirm.com
`
`Paul J. Hayes
`Kevin Gannon
`CESARI AND MCKENNA, LLP
`88 Black Falcon Ave
`Suite 271
`Boston, MA 02110
`Telephone: (617) 951-2500
`Facsimile: (617) 951-3927
`Email: pjh@c-m.com
`Email: ktg@c-m.com
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR THE PLAINTIFFS
`
`IPR2017-01839
`Ubisoft, et al. EX1011 Page 15
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket