`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`UNILOC USA, INC. and
`UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`UBISOFT, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-781
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiffs, Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. (together “Uniloc”), as and
`
`for their complaint against defendant, Ubisoft, Inc. (“Ubisoft”), allege as follows:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Uniloc USA, Inc. (“Uniloc USA”) is a Texas corporation having a principal place
`
`of business at Legacy Town Center I, Suite 380, 7160 Dallas Parkway, Plano Texas 75024.
`
`Uniloc also maintains a place of business at 102 N. College, Suite 603, Tyler, Texas 75702.
`
`2.
`
`Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. (“Uniloc Luxembourg”) is a Luxembourg public limited
`
`liability company having a principal place of business at 15, Rue Edward Steichen, 4th Floor, L-
`
`2540, Luxembourg (R.C.S. Luxembourg B159161).
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, Ubisoft is a California corporation having a
`
`principal place of business in San Francisco, California and offering its products, including those
`
`accused herein of infringement, to customers and/or potential customers located in Texas and in
`
`the judicial Eastern District of Texas. Ubisoft may be served with process through its registered
`
`agent: Stephen Smith, 1900 Avenue of the Stars, 21st Floor, Los Angeles, California 90067.
`
`06096768
`
`IPR2017-01828
`Ubisoft EX1006 Page 1
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00781 Document 1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 2
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`4.
`
`Uniloc brings this action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, 35 U.S.C. § 271 et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a) and 1367.
`
`5.
`
`Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(c) and
`
`1400(b). Upon information and belief, Ubisoft is deemed to reside in this judicial district, has
`
`committed acts of infringement in this judicial district, and/or has purposely transacted business
`
`involving the accused products in this judicial district, including sales to one or more customers
`
`in Texas.
`
`6.
`
`Ubisoft is subject to this Court’s jurisdiction pursuant to due process and/or the
`
`Texas Long Arm Statute due at least to its substantial business in this State and judicial district,
`
`including: (A) at least part of its past infringing activities, (B) regularly doing or soliciting
`
`business in Texas and/or (C) engaging in persistent conduct and/or deriving substantial revenue
`
`from goods and services provided to customers in Texas.
`
`COUNT I
`(INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,489,974)
`
`Uniloc incorporates paragraphs 1-6 above by reference.
`
`Uniloc Luxembourg is the owner, by assignment, of U.S. Patent No. 6,489,974
`
`
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`(“the ’974 Patent”), entitled BUOY ICON NOTIFICATION OF OBJECT INTERFACE
`
`ACCESSIBILITY IN MULTITASKING COMPUTER ENVIRONMENT that issued on
`
`December 3, 2002. A true and correct copy of the ’974 Patent is attached as Exhibit A hereto.
`
`9.
`
`Uniloc USA is the exclusive licensee of the ’974 Patent with ownership of all
`
`substantial rights therein, including the right to grant sublicenses, to exclude others, and to
`
`enforce, sue and recover past damages for the infringement thereof.
`
`
`
`2
`
`IPR2017-01828
`Ubisoft EX1006 Page 2
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00781 Document 1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 3
`
`10.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following illustrates, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay software platform works:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following illustrates, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay software platform works:
`
`
`
`3
`
`IPR2017-01828
`Ubisoft EX1006 Page 3
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00781 Document 1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 4
`
`12.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following illustrates, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay software platform works:
`
`
`
`13.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following illustrates, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay software platform works:
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`IPR2017-01828
`Ubisoft EX1006 Page 4
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00781 Document 1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14.
`
`Upon information and belief, the following illustrates, at least in part, how
`
`Ubisoft’s Uplay software platform works:
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`IPR2017-01828
`Ubisoft EX1006 Page 5
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00781 Document 1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 6
`
`
`
`15. Ubisoft has directly infringed, and continues to directly infringe one or more
`
`claims of the ’974 Patent in this judicial district and elsewhere in Texas, including at least
`
`Claims 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 13, 15 and 19 literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by or
`
`through making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling its Uplay software platform
`
`during the pendency of the ’974 Patent, which software platform inter alia practices a method,
`
`and is a system, implemented on a multitasking computer that comprises first and second
`
`objects, providing notification of a status of said first object on said computer, comprising the
`
`steps of and/or a means for: providing a representation of the first object on a user interface of
`
`the computer, with the representation supporting user interaction with the first object; executing
`
`the first object; while the first object is executing, enabling the second object to support user
`
`interaction with the second object; while the second object is enabled to support user
`
`interaction, determining when the first object ceases executing; and providing a notification on
`
`the user interface when the first object ceases executing by suddenly displaying a notification
`
`icon on the user interface while maintaining the representation of the first object, said
`
`notification being in a location that is separate from the representation of the first object.
`
`16.
`
`In addition, should Ubisoft’s Uplay software platform be found to not literally
`
`infringe the asserted claims of the ‘974 Patent, Ubisoft’s accused system would nevertheless
`
`infringe the asserted claims of the ’974 Patent. More specifically, the accused Uplay software
`
`platform performs substantially the same function (providing notification of an idle status of an
`
`executing object on a multitasking computer), in substantially the same way (by suddenly
`
`
`
`6
`
`IPR2017-01828
`Ubisoft EX1006 Page 6
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00781 Document 1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 7
`
`displaying a notification in a location separate from the representation of the first object), to
`
`yield substantially the same result (alerting the user that a first object is now accessible while a
`
`second object is enabled to support user interaction). Ubisoft would thus be liable for direct
`
`infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.
`
`17.
`
`Ubisoft may have infringed the ’974 Patent through other software utilizing the
`
`same or reasonably similar functionality, including other versions of its Uplay software platform.
`
`Uniloc reserves the right to discover and pursue all such additional infringing software.
`
`18.
`
`Uniloc has been damaged, reparably and irreparably, by Ubisoft’s infringement of
`
`the ’974 Patent and such damage will continue unless and until Ubisoft is enjoined.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`Uniloc requests that the Court enter judgment against Ubisoft as follows:
`
`(A)
`
`(B)
`
`that Ubisoft has infringed the ’974 Patent;
`
`awarding Uniloc its damages suffered as a result of Ubisoft’s infringement of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘974 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284;
`
`
`
`(C)
`
`enjoining Ubisoft, its officers, directors, agents, servants, affiliates, employees,
`
`divisions, branches, subsidiaries and parents, and all others acting in concert or privity with it
`
`from infringing the ’974 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283;
`
`
`
`
`
`(D)
`
`(E)
`
`proper.
`
`
`
`
`
`awarding Uniloc its costs, attorneys’ fees, expenses and interest, and
`
`granting Uniloc such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and
`
`
`
`7
`
`IPR2017-01828
`Ubisoft EX1006 Page 7
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00781 Document 1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 8
`
`
`
`
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`Uniloc hereby demands trial by jury on all issues so triable pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 38.
`
`
`Dated: _July 15, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Craig Tadlock
`Craig Tadlock
`Texas State Bar No. 00791766
`Keith Smiley
`Texas State Bar No. 24067869
`TADLOCK LAW FIRM PLLC
`2701 Dallas Parkway, Suite 360
`Plano, TX 75093
`Tel: (903) 730-6789
`Email: craig@tadlocklawfirm.com
`Email: keith@tadlocklawfirm.com
`
`Paul J. Hayes
`Kevin Gannon
`CESARI AND MCKENNA, LLP
`88 Black Falcon Ave
`Suite 271
`Boston, MA 02110
`Telephone: (617) 951-2500
`Facsimile: (617) 951-3927
`Email: pjh@c-m.com
`Email: ktg@c-m.com
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR THE PLAINTIFFS
`
`8
`
`IPR2017-01828
`Ubisoft EX1006 Page 8
`
`