throbber
A , /
`I{ ~ "
`
`(
`
`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`>UTER PRESS ASSOCIATION WINNER _.,?-~~ T COMPUTER NEWSLETTER
`/\.' .:/
`
`• ' ' • '· >
`
`(.,
`
`f/1.Q.
`
`/dsa?lf'
`1YHL:ROPROCES8fJR~"REPORT
`THE INSIDERS' GUIDE TO ~ItR,€1PRQ,~ESSOR HARDWARE
`.... ~ ow
`$'
`Unified Memory Architecture Cuts PC Cost
`Defines the Platform for Next Generation of Mainstream Computers
`
`VOLUME 9 NUMBER 8
`
`JUNE 19, 1995
`
`byYongYao
`
`A new wave of PC design, named unified memory
`architecture (UMA), is quietly sweeping the PC indus(cid:173)
`try. With the unified memory architecture, a PC com(cid:173)
`bines its main memory and its frame buffer in a single
`physical DRAM array, eliminating the traditional stand(cid:173)
`alone frame buffer-a $30 to $60 saving. Core-logic ven(cid:173)
`dors are rushing to get on the UMA bandwagon, and
`companies that build video/graphics controllers are ei(cid:173)
`ther seeking partners or diving into the already crowded
`core-logic business. System manufacturers are enthusi(cid:173)
`astic about the new architecture and are eager for the
`cost advantage of upcoming UMA chip sets.
`The potential impact ofUMA, however, is far more
`than just cost savings. A paradigm shift from the 16-
`year-old PC architecture originated by IBM, UMA will
`redefine the business model of some chip makers and
`trigger another round of consolidation in the core-logic
`and graphics markets. Coupled with a move to get rid of
`the ISA bus, the unified memory architecture leads to a
`new level of integration. More functions and features
`will be packed into the PC without significant price in(cid:173)
`creases, ultimately benefiting the consumer.
`
`UMA Approach Brings Cost Savings
`Let us examine the memory requirement for today's
`mainstream PC displays. An 800 x 600 screen with 8-bit
`color requires 480K of memory. A 1024 x 768 screen with
`8-bit color requires 768K, and the same 1024 x 768 reso(cid:173)
`lution requires 1.5M for 16-bit color. On the other hand,
`the granularity offered by today's commodity DRAM
`technology is 256K x 16. Thus, to satisfy the requirement
`of 480K of memory in a 32-bit-wide graphics subsystem
`(using two DRAMs), a standalone frame buffer has to be
`1M in size, wasting 0.52M of valuable DRAM. By the
`same token, a half megabyte of DRAM will be wasted if
`the frame buffer requires 1.5M.
`In the unified memory architecture, however, the
`system can allocate the exact amount of DRAM required
`
`( 0
`
`(
`
`for the frame buffer. During its booting sequence, the
`machine assigns a block of DRAM for its frame buffer,
`and whatever remains is used for main memory. The
`size for the frame buffer is dynamically configurable, de(cid:173)
`pending on the choice of display resolution and color
`depth. For instance, 480K will be assigned for 800 x 600
`resolution and 8-bit color.
`The memory granularity using the UMA approach
`is determined by the operating system. For DOS and
`Windows, the granularity is 64K This is the maximum
`possible amount of DRAM wasted. In the above example,
`32K of DRAM is wasted. Nothing will be wasted if the
`display resolution is 1024 x 768, whether it is 8-bit, 16-
`bit, or 24-bit color.
`The cost savings do not come for free. Assume that
`a PC has 8M of main memory, a 1M separate frame
`buffer, and a 1024 x 768 display with 8-bit color. Now let
`its graphics subsystem share the 8M DRAM with its
`Continued on page 6
`
`In This Issue
`
`Unified Memory Architecture Cuts PC Cost .................. l
`
`Editorial: PowerPC Delivers Beef, But No Sizzle .......... 3
`
`Most Significant Bits ....................................................... 4
`
`Intel Plugs i960 into PC Servers .................................. 10
`
`Power PC 604 Emerges in Systems .............................. :12
`
`Pentium Competitors Go Head to Head ...................... 14
`
`Patent Watch ................................................................. 21
`
`Literature Watch ........................................................... 22
`
`Recent IC Announcements ........................................... 23
`
`Resources ....................................................................... 24
`
`Copyright C 1995 MicroDesign Resources. Reproduction by any means ia expreuly prohibited.
`
`ISSN 0899-9341.
`
`AMAZON 1009
`Page 1 of 6
`
`

`

`IV/JCROPROCESSOR REPORT
`
`Unified Memory
`Continued from page 1
`
`main memory subsystem, eliminating the 1M frame
`buffer. Since 768K of the 8M must be used for the graph(cid:173)
`ics subsystem, only 7 .25M will be available for the OS
`and applications. If the OS and applications need more
`than 7.25M of main memory, the 9% shortage of avail(cid:173)
`able memory will increase the amount of swapping be(cid:173)
`tween main memory and the hard disk, which degrades
`performance. For a true-color high-resolution display,
`the memory loss is more significant.
`Fortunately, most commercially available graphics
`applications are written for 8-bit color, and most of
`today's screens are either 800 x 600 or 1024 x 768. To
`steal one-half or three-quarters of a megabyte from the
`8M main memory generally causes no performance prob(cid:173)
`lems. But the $30 savings is substantial in today's main(cid:173)
`stream desktop market, where system OEMs negotiate
`over pennies. This explains why most OEMs are enthu(cid:173)
`siastic about UMA.
`The exact savings are implementation dependent.
`For performance reasons, the amount of memory for the
`frame buffer may be added to the main memory. For the
`case above, this would result in 9M of main memory,
`with 8.25M available for OS and applications. Another
`way to trade the cost savings for enhanced performance
`is to add an L2 cache. The L2 cache will reduce CPU ac(cid:173)
`cesses to DRAM, leaving more memory bandwidth for
`graphics. Therefore, under the UMA umbrella, there
`will be different approaches for chip-set design.
`
`Weitek Samples 486 UMA Chip Set
`Aiming to bring high-performance 64-bit graphics
`and multimedia to low-end 486 PCs, Weitek has an(cid:173)
`nounced its W464 UMA chip set. Historically, Weitek
`has not been involved in the core-logic business. It does,
`however, have graphics expertise and PC market experi-
`
`CPU
`tt.
`Address l
`
`CPU Bus
`
`-
`
`c:
`
`Cache
`SRAM
`
`t
`
`t
`
`! Da~
`
`Host
`IIF
`
`PCI
`IIF
`
`RAM
`DAC/
`CRTC
`
`T
`Figure 1. The W464 chip set integrates graphics and core-logic
`chips that share a single DRAM array.
`
`' - - -
`PCibus
`
`lD
`Host
`1/F g
`i
`>-
`as
`t:
`0
`Cache 8 ~
`<
`I•Dala• ~
`PMU Cntf ~
`<
`~
`a:
`0
`<
`g
`E
`a:
`Q)
`0
`:::>
`~
`::::.
`:::>
`C)
`C)
`
`DMA
`
`ISA
`1/F
`
`PCI
`1/F
`1
`
`ence. This is a good example of how the unified memory
`architecture can change a company's business outlook.
`As Figure 1 shows, the chip set is composed of two
`208-pin PQFP devices that integrate complete core logic
`for a 486 PC (including Cyrix Mise), a 64-bit DRAM(cid:173)
`based GUI accelerator, and a 135-MHz RAMDAC. The
`graphics accelerator, Weitek's fourth-generation high(cid:173)
`performance design, handles up to 1280 x 1024 resolu(cid:173)
`tion and 32-bit color, 256 Windows raster operations
`(ROPs), and full plug-and-play compatibility. In addi(cid:173)
`tion, graphics data is stored using a lossless compression
`algorithm, reducing the amount of memory needed for
`the frame buffer.
`Weitek has seen the first silicon of its W464 chip
`set, which is currently in debugging. It is now running
`DOS and Windows applications. The W464 is expected
`to be in production by September, making it the indus(cid:173)
`try's first PC UMA chip set that offers a PCI interface.
`The Weitek implementation has gone one step fur(cid:173)
`ther. It eliminates not only the standalone frame buffer
`but also the separate graphics-controller chip. Compared
`with most 32-bit 486 chip sets, the W 464 may actually
`offer better performance, due to its 64-bit memory and
`graphics, while lowering overall system cost.
`Since the 464 chip set works only with the 486, it
`might be too late for the desktop market, which is
`rapidly moving to Pentium-class CPUs. Given the Sep(cid:173)
`tember production date of the W464, OEMs must decide
`whether to use it based on the system redesign cost and
`delayed time to market. Even though Weitek will pro(cid:173)
`vide a reference design kit (which has become a common
`business practice in the PC world) for launching a new
`design, system manufacturers will still need a certain
`amount of design effort. Weitek's timing would be better
`for the 486 notebook market, but the W464 is not a 3.3-
`V chip set. It also lacks enhanced power management
`and LCD control logic.
`Weitek is developing a Pentium chip set, named
`the W564. The experience of the W464 will certainly
`help Weitek get this Pentium chip set to market more
`quickly and with less design risk. The W564 will sup(cid:173)
`port all Pentium-pinout CPUs (see page 14). It will also
`add several performance enhancements, including
`Weitek's video-acceleration technology, local-bus EIDE,
`and advanced DRAM support. The W564 will be a 3.3-V
`device with 5-V-tolerant I/0.
`VLSI Plans a Single-Chip Solution
`Like Weitek, VLSI Technology has put th e graphics
`controller into a core-logic UMA chip set. VLSI differen(cid:173)
`tiates its solution by targeting Pentium-class CPUs with
`a 3.3-V design. VLSI has been designing its desktop
`UMA chip set, named Coyote, and its notebook UMA
`chip set, Falcon, in parallel. By incorporating the Intel
`burst order as well as th e linear burst mode, the two-
`
`6
`
`J UNE 19, 1995
`
`AMAZON 1009
`Page 2 of 6
`
`

`

`chip sets will support Pentium, the K5, and Ml. The pro(cid:173)
`jected date for engineering samples is 1Q96 for Coyote
`and 2Q96 for Falcon. Using a 352-pin BGA package,
`VLSI designers combine almost all core logic and graph(cid:173)
`ics-controllogic into a single chip. Figure 2 shows a sys(cid:173)
`tem diagram for the Coyote chip set.
`The VL82C546 integrates a DRAM controller, PCI
`interface, graphics accelerator, L2 cache controller,
`RAMDAC, and distributed DMA controller (see sidebar,
`next page). The DRAM control logic supports fast-page(cid:173)
`mode DRAM, EDO DRAM, SDRAM, and SGDRAM. By
`integrating the distributed DMA and serial interrupt,
`VLSI makes the VL82C542 ISA bridge chip optional.
`This integration makes it possible to have high-speed yet
`compatible PCI connections for legacy devices.
`VLSI has developed its own graphics technology,
`called the GraphiCore Architecture, in the past two
`years. The key elements of GraphiCore are a config(cid:173)
`urable geometry pipeline and an orthogonal instruction
`set for single-state execution. The accelerated graphics
`functions include line draw, clipping, all 256 Windows
`ROPs, bitBLT, stretchBLT, patternBLT, color expan(cid:173)
`sion, color compression, rectangle fill, and text opera(cid:173)
`tions. The graphics accelerator resides on the CPU bus
`so as to run at the CPU bus frequency.
`In contrast to non-UMA approaches, VLSI's solu(cid:173)
`tion minimizes chip count, cuts overall system cost, re(cid:173)
`duces power consumption, and eliminates redundant
`functions. These features are especially important for
`notebooks, where board space and power budget are crit(cid:173)
`ical. With its parallel development projects, VLSI may
`well be the first company to bring a UMA notebook chip
`set to market. This strategy will give VLSI a head start
`for Pentium-class notebooks.
`Opti Partners with Graphics Vendors
`Opti has taken a different approach, defining a 20-
`page specification for the interface between the memory
`controller and the graphics controller. Figure 3 shows
`the proposed system. The interface is straightforward.
`Essentially, it consists of only two signals: MREO# and
`MGNT#. Under Opti's specification, the memory controller
`is the default owner of the DRAM array. The graphics
`controller must send a request (MREQ#=O) to the memory
`controller every time it needs to access the DRAM array.
`It will not gain access until the memory controller re(cid:173)
`sponds with an acknowledge (MGNT#=O).
`Opti presented this proposal to the VESA commit(cid:173)
`tee last month to stimulate a standardization process.
`Besides the two-signal interface, Opti's specification also
`includes recommendations on system BIOS, device dri(cid:173)
`vers, and future system compatibility.
`Because of the slow process of standardization, Opti
`has joined with a couple of unnamed graphics vendors to
`provide a UMA core-logic and graphics chip set. It has
`
`,\I I C I~ 0 P I{ 0 C E S S 0 R R E P 0 I{ T
`
`EDO
`DRAM
`or
`SDRAM
`
`CPU Bus = Control
`
`352BGA
`
`VL82C546
`
`Peripheral
`Control
`208MQFP
`
`VI...82C547
`
`PCI Slols
`
`00001
`
`Optional ISA
`Bridge
`160 MQFP
`
`VL82C542
`
`Figure 2. VLSI's Coyote chip set is a single-chip solution for the core
`logic and graphics functions.
`
`also been working with several system houses for early
`design-ins. Opti expects that its UMA core-logic chip set
`will be on the market by year-end. The supporting
`graphics chips should arrive at about the same time.
`Compared with VLSI's approach, Opti's solution
`will have some performance disadvantages due to its
`interchip arbitration, although some of the arbitration
`can be overlapped with the DRAM's recharge time. It
`does, however, have the advantage of being flexible. De(cid:173)
`signers have flexibility in architecture trade-offs, while
`OEMs have flexibility when choosing graphics solu(cid:173)
`tions. This approach will be appreciated by those com(cid:173)
`panies having design expertise with either core logic or
`graphics but not both.
`Opti is a major player in the core-logic business. Its
`business model has always been to pursue volume mar(cid:173)
`kets. A fundamental question to be asked before adopting
`an Opti-like approach, however, is why such an interface
`protocol is needed in the first place. If the graphics/video
`controller is integrated into the core-logic chip set, this
`protocol becomes unnecessary.
`
`!
`Optl
`Host
`Memory
`Controller
`
`P54C
`
`1r
`I
`
`Oala(63:0)
`
`Optl
`Data
`Buffer
`Controller
`
`l
`
`MREGI
`
`PCI bus
`
`!
`Third Party
`MGNTI
`I Memav A[11:0} ~ory A[B:Q] Graphics/
`VIdeo
`CAS(7:0)f
`CAS£7:0)1
`Accelerator
`
`RASf
`
`RASf
`
`DRAM
`Arrary
`
`Memory Oala (63:01
`
`Figure 3. Opti's proposal includes signaling between the memory
`controller and the graphics controller.
`
`JUNE 19, 1995
`
`7
`
`AMAZON 1009
`Page 3 of 6
`
`

`

`MICROPROCESSOR REPORT
`
`Eliminating the ISA Bus
`The ISA bus, introduced in 1981, has long been in(cid:173)
`adequate for PC performance needs. Most PCs shipped
`today have two peripheral buses: ISA and PCI. It
`would be nice ifthere were only one peripheral bus, but
`there are two major technical issues-legacy DMA and
`legacy interrupts-that prevent PC makers from get(cid:173)
`ting rid of the ISA bus.
`To support legacy DMA, the PCI bus must address
`three problems. First, PCI does not have the necessary
`seven DRQ# and seven DACK# signals. Second, on the
`ISA bus, the I/0 and memory commands are separate
`signals. Thus, simultaneous I/0 and memory transfers
`are possible on the ISA bus but not on the PCI bus, ac(cid:173)
`cording to its current definition. The third technical dif(cid:173)
`ficulty is that the ISA bus allows long-length I/0 trans(cid:173)
`fers (on the order of one microsecond), which will create
`a major performance limitation for PCI.
`In terms of legacy interrupts, the PCI bus has only
`four sharable IRQs, while the ISA bus supports 11
`edge-sensitive IRQs. The common solution is to intro(cid:173)
`duce sideband signals from PCI to ISA. This solution
`does not allow the elimination of the ISA bus.
`Aiming to introduce products without an ISA bus,
`eight companies, including Vl.SI, formed a consortium
`in late 1994 to define a standard to support ISA devices
`on PCI. The standard, called distributed DMA, is now
`in its final legal review and will soon be released to the
`public. Following the distributed DMA standard, chip
`vendors can integrate ISA support into PCI compo(cid:173)
`nents. PC system manufacturers will soon be able to
`build PCs without the ISA bus, resulting in higher in(cid:173)
`tegration, better performance, and yet lower cost PCs.
`
`PCs are a commodity business: the bottom line for a
`system OEM is to lower its manufacturing cost while
`maximizing system performance. To be adopted by PC
`makers, every new technology must add real value and
`improve the bottom line. For example, a few years ago
`Intel and ATI tried to establish a standard for interfac(cid:173)
`ing separate graphics and video chips. The standard did
`not take off because there was no incentive for separat(cid:173)
`ing graphics and video, which should naturally fit to(cid:173)
`gether. Therefore, any separate UMA graphics approach
`may be short-lived for the mainstream PCs; the inte(cid:173)
`grated approach will ultimately prevail.
`
`Everyone Wants a Common Standard
`Although an Opti-like interface protocol might be
`short-lived for mainstream PCs , a common specification
`for BIOS, device drivers, and future system compatibil(cid:173)
`ity is extremely important. The entire PC industry will
`benefit if there is only one UMA standard. All the major
`UMA players have claimed that they would stand behind
`a common standard if one appears.
`
`In the past year, Opti, VLSI, and Intel have been
`the three biggest chip-set suppliers. Of these leaders,
`only Intel has not said whether it is working on UMA so(cid:173)
`lutions. Its latest chip sets, Triton and Orion, are not
`based on the unified memory architecture, but Intel is
`interested in UMA. No company can ignore the potential
`UMA impact, including the microprocessor giant. Intel is
`known to be collaborating with Cirrus Logic on UMA
`chip sets; Cirrus plans to roll out its UMA graphics con(cid:173)
`troller in the first half of 1996.
`Companies like Intel and Cirrus have been taking
`cautious steps, carefully examining the issues associated
`with different UMA approaches. PC graphics has some
`unique characteristics. For instance, more than 90% of
`CPU cycles to the frame buffer are write cycles; the CPU
`rarely reads from it. Furthermore, when both the mem(cid:173)
`ory subsystem and the graphics subsystem share the
`same bus bandwidth, what will be the overall perfor(cid:173)
`mance impact? In this design, it becomes critical to in(cid:173)
`telligently use the bus bandwidth, and the right kinds of
`FIFO schemes are helpful. Designers have to be careful
`that their machines will not hang up when end users
`switch display resolutions.
`Chips and Technologies also is working on its own
`UMA solution, which may be available before the end of
`the year. C&T's advantage is its in-house expertise on
`both graphics and core logic. Even so, C&T would like to
`work with others to drive one UMA standard, so all UMA
`chip sets can share the same BIOS and device drivers.
`
`Separate Frame Buffer Has Its Niche
`In the PC industry, most technologies or new archi(cid:173)
`tectures start at the high end and then migrate to the low
`end. It seems, however, that the unified memory archi(cid:173)
`tecture is evolving the other way around. It will be
`adopted by low-end PCs first, then by midrange PCs, and
`may eventually be incorporated into some high-end ma(cid:173)
`chines. The unified memory architecture is driven pri(cid:173)
`marily by cost reduction, whereas most other PC archi(cid:173)
`tecture changes are initiated to enhance performance.
`Even though the unified memory architecture will
`soon become a dominant PC approach, a graphics con(cid:173)
`troller with a dedicated frame buffer will still have a role
`for years to come. The desktop market alone is expected
`to exceed 50 million units in 1996, according to Com(cid:173)
`puter Intelligence InfoCorp. There is enough room for
`multiple solutions, including the conventional separate
`frame buffer.
`By using new DRAM technologies, such as MD RAM
`from MoSys, graphics companies such as Tseng Labs
`and S3 may design their video/graphics accelerators to
`deliver more performance or to embed specific features
`that serve power users. For those users, features such as
`video playback, 3D graphics, and image rendering will
`soon be mandatory. In addition, video and graphics are
`
`8
`
`JUNE 19, 1995
`
`AMAZON 1009
`Page 4 of 6
`
`

`

`still emerging technologies. More advanced approaches
`are under development. It will be much easier for the
`standalone graphics controller to take advantage of the
`latest developments.
`With its dedicated frame buffer and specialty mem(cid:173)
`ory, a high-end graphics controller should have perfor(cid:173)
`mance superior to its equivalent UMA solution. For in(cid:173)
`stance, in the UMA design, CPU memory accesses have
`to be held while the memory bus is busy serving graph(cid:173)
`ics functions. This alone can cause a 10% performance
`degradation for certain applications.
`We recommend that graphics chip vendors give
`their standalone controllers both a dedicated frame
`buffer and hooks for interfacing with some of the upcom(cid:173)
`ing UMA chip sets. This is a safe way for a graphics com(cid:173)
`pany to reduce risk and maintain its market share.
`Technology Revives the UMA Approach
`The idea of the unified memory architecture is noth(cid:173)
`ing new. Apple's early Macs and some workstations have
`been designed this way for years. Perhaps there were no
`particular reasons why IBM defined its early PCs using
`a separate frame buffer, although IBM had certain con(cid:173)
`straints on the availability of off-the-shelf components.
`In 1979, PCs were using text-mode monochrome dis(cid:173)
`plays; the amount of memory needed for those displays
`was very small. It would have been easier just to put the
`frame buffer into main memory.
`The non-UMA architecture, however, has been the
`PC platform of choice since day one. A few companies,
`such as C&T and Tandy, tried UMA once before but did
`not go far with it. Why, all of a sudden, has the unified
`memory architecture become so hot? Various technolo(cid:173)
`gies are converging to revive the unified memory archi(cid:173)
`tecture in the PC market.
`The increasing density of commodity DRAMs has
`made non-UMA solutions more costly. On the other
`hand, this same trend will make systems with at least
`16M of main memory more popular. Therefore, it makes
`more sense to steal main memory for the frame buffer.
`In addition, main-memory and frame-buffer band(cid:173)
`widths are converging. Exotic high-bandwidth memories
`for frame buffers are not gettin.g into volume PCs. These
`low volumes have kept their prices high. For example,
`VRAM chips have always been two or more times as ex(cid:173)
`pensive as commodity DRAMs.
`In contrast, affordable new DRAM technologies,
`such as EDO DRAMs, are substantially increasing main(cid:173)
`memory bandwidth, while advanced caching and buffer(cid:173)
`ing schemes have kept most CPU memory references off
`the main-memory bus. In addition, 64-bit data paths,
`data bursting, and high bus frequencies have greatly re(cid:173)
`duced the time needed to transfer a given amount of data.
`Together, these changes have created more bus band(cid:173)
`width for graphics/video functions.
`
`,\I 1 C R 0 P 1~ 0 C E S S 0 R R f: I' 0 R T
`
`Price & Availability
`Samples of the W464 UMA chip set are available
`now from Weitek in two 208-pin PQFPs. Production is
`scheduled to begin in September. The 10,000-piece
`price for the chip set is $43.50. For more information,
`contact Weitek (Sunnyvale, Calif.) at 408. 738.8400; fax
`408.739.4374.
`Samples of the Coyote chip set will be available in
`1Q96 from VLSI Technology, in a single 352-pin BGA.
`Production is scheduled to begin in 2Q96. Pricing of the
`chip set will be available in 4Q95. For more informa(cid:173)
`tion, contact VLSI (Tempe, Ariz.) at 602.752.6481; fax
`602.752.6014. For information on the distributed DMA
`standard, send e-mail to deuoy@tempe.ulsi.com.
`Samples of the Opti UMA chip set will be available in
`4Q95 at a $40 sample price. Production is scheduled to
`begin in 1Q96. For more information on Opti's UMA
`specification and its chip set, contact Opti (Santa Clara,
`Calif.) at 408.486.8605; fax 408.980.8860.
`
`Today's CPUs have enough computing power to
`handle jobs like line drawing, image decompression, and
`graphics rendering. These functions previously relied on
`special accelerators. A unified memory actually in(cid:173)
`creases CPU graphics performance by making it more
`convenient for the CPU to access the frame buffer.
`BGA packages and high integration offer designers
`an efficient way of balancing signal I/0 and chip gate
`count. It has become economical to pack the core logic
`and graphics control into one chip. Although the BGA
`package costs about one cent more per pin than the
`PQFP, the BGA package is relatively new, and there is
`room for BGA prices to drop.
`Because ofthe price tag for big monitors, main(cid:173)
`stream PCs may still be using 17" or smaller displays for
`some time to come. Given the limitations of human vision,
`going beyond the resolution of 1280 x 1024 does not make
`much sense for these monitors. Also, human eyes can dis(cid:173)
`tinguish only a certain number of colors: 24-bit color space
`is probably enough. These three facts tell us that the
`amount of memory needed for the graphics/video subsys(cid:173)
`tem is no more than 4M for mainstream PCs. They also
`show that the memory bandwidth for supporting the
`graphics subsystem will not increase dramatically.
`In short, technology has arrived at the point where
`it is inevitable for future mainstream PCs to incorporate
`the unified memory architecture. Some OEMs will show
`UMA systems at Comdex next spring. Almost all ven(cid:173)
`dors now working on UMA solutions have plans to ex(cid:173)
`tend this architecture to P6-class machines. We project
`that, 18 months from now, the UMA approach will be
`dominant for all PCs but high-end desktops. •
`Yong Yao is the director of MicroDesign Resources'
`Technology Roadmap service (see page 5).
`
`JUNE 19, 1995
`
`9
`
`AMAZON 1009
`Page 5 of 6
`
`

`

`HP Rolls Out 120-MHz PA-7200 Systems
`On the heels of its 100-MHz servers, HP has raised the
`speed of its PA-7200 and put it into a dual-processor
`workstation. The new J-series desktops deliver 169
`SPECint92 and 269 SPECfp92 with a single processor.
`Entry pricing for the 120-MHz J210 is $41,770 for the
`uniprocessor and $54,770 for two processors. The sys(cid:173)
`tems are due to begin shipments in 3Q95, but HP does
`not expect volume shipments until late this year.
`These systems set a new mark for PA-RISC perfor(cid:173)
`mance and keep HP ahead of Sun's 125-MHz Hyper(cid:173)
`Spare systems (see MPR 5/8/95, p. 4). Digital's Alpha
`workstations, however, deliver far better performance,
`and IBM's new 604-based workstations (see page 12)
`offer equivalent integer performance for far less money.
`HP is waiting for the PA-8000 to restore the competi(cid:173)
`tiveness of its product line, but that processor won't be
`available until1Q96.
`
`R4400 Reaches New Performance Level
`NEC has announced sampling of a 250-MHz R4400. The
`company achieved this speed using a 0.35-micron pro(cid:173)
`cess, which also shrinks the die to 108 mm2 . The com(cid:173)
`pany estimates that the new chip will achieve 175 SPEC(cid:173)
`int92 and 178 SPECfp92. Production shipments are
`slated for the third quarter. NEC did not announce vol(cid:173)
`ume pricing; samples are available for $2,000.
`The new version must satisfy high-end MIPS users
`until the R10000 is ready early next year. It keeps high(cid:173)
`end MIPS performance competitive with most other
`RISC architectures, at least until UltraSparc and the
`PowerPC 620 become available late this year. Interest(cid:173)
`ingly, the new R4400 has only 13% better integer perfor(cid:173)
`mance than the 133-MHz Pentium and requires a 20%
`larger die in a similar 0.35-micron process, gaining no
`advantage from its streamlined RISC architecture.
`
`Cypress Enters Pentium Chip-Set Market
`Cypress's first Pentium chip set uses an innovative inte(cid:173)
`grated cache to reduce cost while increasing perfor(cid:173)
`mance. The HyperCache chip set consists of three chips:
`a PCI and memory interface, a data-path chip with inte(cid:173)
`grated 128K cache, and a system I/0 device. The chip set
`supports Pentium-class CPUs from Intel, AMD, and
`Cyrix (see page 14) at bus speeds of up to 66 MHz.
`Integrating a complete 128K cache and tags into a
`single package eliminates the cost of several packages
`from a typical discrete cache. Furthermore, timing is
`greatly improved, as critical signals are no longer driven
`from chip to chip. HyperCache uses a synchronous core
`to deliver 3-1-1-1 burst timing, yet the entire chip set
`costs little more than a discrete synchronous cache of the
`same size. System performance is further improved by
`the cache's two-way set-associative design; discrete
`caches are typically direct mapped due to pin-count
`
`MICROPROCESSOR REPORT
`
`New Analyst Yong Yao
`Yong Yao has joined MicroDesign Resources as our
`senior analyst for PC technologies. His latest work ap(cid:173)
`pears on the cover of this issue, and he will continue to
`write articles for Microprocessor Report covering chip
`sets, graphics, and other aspects of system design.
`Yong comes to us from Vitesse, where he was the di(cid:173)
`rector of product planning as well as the designer of the
`multiprocessor V-Bus (see MPR 5/30/94, p. 1). His expe(cid:173)
`rience also includes designing system-logic chip sets,
`graphics chips, and network interfaces as well as re(cid:173)
`search at UC Berkeley. Yong has a PhD in electrical en(cid:173)
`gineering from Shanghai Jiao-tong University.
`His primary role with MDR will be to direct our Tech(cid:173)
`nology Roadmap service, which provides detailed infor(cid:173)
`mation on PC system design trends, including analyses
`of current products and projections of future configura(cid:173)
`tions and technology trends. For more information
`about this service, contact Yong at our editorial office
`(see page 2).
`
`limitations. Cypress claims that these features make its
`128K cache comparable to a 256K asynchronous design.
`The chip set includes a PCI-to-ISA bridge, EIDE
`support with bus mastering, DMA/interrupt control, a
`real-time clock, keyboard and mouse control, and power
`management, giving it a greater level of integration than
`Intel's popular Triton chip set. At $48 for the three-chip
`set, HyperCache carries about the same price as the
`cacheless Triton. The Cypress cache can be expanded in
`128K increments at $14 each.
`Cypress entered the chip-set arena by purchasing
`Contaq Microsystems, a 10-person design firm. Cypress
`itself is a leading supplier of cache chips for Pentium
`PCs, and this customer base should give its new product
`a quick entry into the high-volume chip-set market.
`
`Somerset Seeks New Head
`Seeking to streamline the decision-making process, ffiM
`and Motorola have decided to reorganize their Somerset
`Design Center, the source of most Power PC processor
`designs to date. Since its inception, the center has been
`managed jointly by IBM and Motorola personnel. This
`awkward structure has slowed progress in some areas
`and caused enough dissatisfaction that engineers have
`been leaving for greener pastures.
`Given the lackluster results of the 604 and 620 (see
`page 3), a change is in order. The companies have now
`assigned a single leader for each project, replacing the
`old co-manager structure. They are also seeking a single
`manager to oversee all of Somerset, although it may take
`months to locate the right person. The partners hope
`that these changes will spur progress on the next gener(cid:173)
`ation of PowerPC designs. •
`
`JUNE 19, 1995
`
`5
`
`AMAZON 1009
`Page 6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket