throbber
7/13/2017
`
`(flow-center)
`
`Guide to Chat Apps - Columbia Journalism Review
`
`
`
`Guide to Chat Apps
`
`Image: Getty
`
`Executive Summary | IntroductionzThe Dawn of the Social Messaging Era | Key Players and Case
`
`Studies | Conclusion | Further Reading | Glossary | Interviewees | Citations
`
`Executive Summary
`
`Messaging apps now have more global users than traditional social networks—which means they will
`
`play an increasingly important role in the distribution of digital journalism in the future. While chat
`
`platforms initially rose to prominence by offering a low-cost, web -based alternative to SMS, over
`
`time they evolved into multimedia hubs that support photos, Videos, games, payments, and more.
`
`While many news organizations don’t yet use messaging apps, digitally savvy outlets like BuzzFeed,
`
`Mashable, The Huflington Post, and VICE have accompanied a more traditional player in BBC News
`
`by establishing a presence on a number of these platforms.
`
`To complement our research, we interviewed leadership at multiple news outlets and chat platforms,
`
`thereby synthesizing key lessons and presenting notable case studies reflecting the variety of
`
`creative and strategic work taking place within the messaging space. Most publisher efforts around
`
`messaging apps are still in a formative, experimental stage, but even those have often proven
`
`effective in diversifying traffic sources for digital content.
`
`httpszllwww .0] r .org/tow_center_reports/gui de_to_chat_apps.php
`
`1/41
`
`Page 1 of 41
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1029
`
`Page 1 of 41
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1029
`
`

`

`7/13/2017
`
`Guide to Chat Apps - Columbia Journalism Review
`
`Drawing upon our interviews and case studies, we identify a number of opportunities and challenges
`
`for organizations using—or hoping to use—messaging apps for news. We argue that to devise a
`
`successful messaging app strategy, publishers must understand regional strongholds, user
`
`demographics, and popular features of each app. Advantages to the chat ecosystem include huge,
`
`untapped audiences; high engagement through push notifications; unique products like stickers and
`
`“chatbots” (see glossary for definitions); and the opportunity to build community through chat
`
`rooms and crowdsourced storytelling. Meanwhile, challenges include limited analytics tools and a
`
`fragmented social landscape boasting roughly a dozen messaging apps, each with over 50 million
`
`registered users.
`
`Our case studies illustrate a number of ways in which major news outlets have utilized various
`
`messaging apps, each with its own niche characteristics. In the past two years, many platforms—
`
`including Snapchat, Viber, Kik, LINE, WeChat, and Telegram—introduced ofl'lcial channels that
`
`publishers like CNN, The New York Times, The Huflington Post, and Cliff Central now leverage for
`
`content distribution and user engagement. Other players, like WhatsApp, have no ofl‘icial offering for
`
`media owners, but this has not deterred organizations—most notably the BBC—from launching
`
`experimental campaigns.
`
`Sign up for CJR'S daily email
`
`Email address
`
`SUBSCRIBE
`
`Our research indicates that one of the greatest benefits of chat apps is the opportunity to use these
`
`platforms as live, sandbox environments. The chance to play and iterate has helped several news
`
`organizations develop mobile-first content and experiential offerings that would have proved
`
`difficult in other digital environments. As these services primarily—and in some cases exclusively—
`
`exist on mobile phones, editorial teams have learned to focus purely on the mobile experience,
`
`freeing themselves from considerations about how content will appear on desktop websites or other
`broadcast mediums.
`
`As happened after the early days of social media, before which a proliferation of services (some with
`
`regional strengths) led to intense competition for user attention, we expect to see some eventual
`
`consolidation among chat apps. While Facebook Messenger and Skype do not garner much focus in
`
`this report, we believe they could become significant players in this space over the coming year as
`
`they figure out the right proposition for their platforms to partner with media organizations.
`
`Elsewhere, we conclude that issues around information, privacy, personal security, and mobile data
`
`penetration will unfold in different ways around the world; apps like Telegram and FireChat are
`
`among those at the forefront of addressing and solving these problems. They, in conjunction with
`
`httpszllwww .cj r .org/tow_center_reports/gui de_to_chat_apps.php
`
`2/41
`
`Page 2 of41
`
`Page 2 of 41
`
`

`

`7/13/2017
`
`Guide to Chat Apps - Columbia Journalism Review
`
`similar applications, are likely to see an increase in user uptake as they meet needs that other major
`
`chat apps are unable to serve.
`
`In developing editorial strategies for some of these wide-ranging messaging platforms, news
`
`organizations are not just helping to future-proof themselves, they are also venturing into online
`
`spaces that could enable them to reach hundreds of millions of (often young) people with Whom they
`
`have never engaged before.
`
`Key Observations
`
`The key findings of this report can be summarized as follows: Messaging apps offer strong
`
`opportunities to engage new or diflicult-to-reach demographics. For example, Snapchat, a very
`
`popular app among millennials, has been credited with engaging and informing young audiences on
`
`complex issues like the Iran nuclear deal.
`
`Innovations such as bespoke (or customized) stickers and emojis can help news outlets quickly build
`
`significant audiences via messaging apps.
`
`Messaging apps enable news outlets to gather (potentially exclusive) user-generated content and can
`
`become a major source during breaking news situations (e.g., as in the BBC’s coverage of the second
`
`Nepal earthquake in 20 1 5) .
`
`News outlets may need to experiment with a variety of chat apps to decipher which content type best
`
`suits the audiences of each app. BuzzFeed, for example, had considerably more success using LINE
`for soft news than for hard news.
`
`Messaging apps can provide unique opportunities for giving audiences direct access to content and
`
`publishers, be it through tailormade WeChat platforms (Cliff Central) or Public Chats on Viber (The
`
`Huffington Post).
`
`Messaging apps provide a space for news outlets to engage their audiences with different—possibly
`
`lighter—types of content (e.g., The Washington Post has used Kik to distribute games, quizzes, and
`
`chat adventures).
`
`Even apps that are not as geared toward publishing as some of their competitors, such as WhatsApp,
`
`hold great potential for news outlets if used strategically.
`
`Messaging apps not only facilitate communication with eyewitnesses in areas where other forms of
`
`communication aren’t functioning (e.g., during extreme weather conditions), they can also provide a
`
`platform for people who don’t feel safe speaking on the telephone. Additionally, apps such as
`
`Telegram focus strongly on encryption and security.
`
`Messaging apps are not used solely to drive traffic to websites (e.g., BuzzFeed is using LINE as part of
`
`a more distributed strategy and aims to provide as much information as possible inside the app,
`
`rather than direct users to its website).
`
`When sourcing user-generated content, apps like WhatsApp, which are tied to a user’s phone
`
`number, can significantly speed up the verification process as they provide a direct line to the content
`
`httpszllwww .cj r .org/tow_center_reports/gui de_to_chat_apps.php
`
`3/41
`
`Page 3 of41
`
`Page 3 of 41
`
`

`

`7/13/2017
`
`Guide to Chat Apps - Columbia Journalism Review
`
`creator/eyewitness.
`
`Messaging apps are relatively new and evolving at a rapid pace. Consequently, many news outlets are
`
`still in the process of establishing strategies to best utilize these platforms.
`
`There is emerging evidence that messaging apps may drive trafl‘ic back to outlets’ other, more
`
`traditional platforms (e.g., CNN’s Snapchat Discover drove people to seek out longer-form content
`
`on CNN’s TV news channel).
`
`PDFs and printed copies of this report are available on the Tow Center’s Gitbook page
`
`(https://www.gitbook.com/book/towcenter/guide-to-chat-apps/details).
`
`Introduction: The Dawn of the Social Messaging Era
`
`“The social media phase of the Internet ended,” declared Fred Wilson—a leading venture capitalist
`
`and early investor in Twitter, Foursquare, and Tumblr—in his 2014 “What Just Happened?” year-in-
`reView. He continued:
`
`Entrepreneurs and developers still build social applications. We still use them. But there isn’t much
`
`innovation here anymore...messaging is the new social media...families use WhatsApp groups instead
`
`ofFacebook. Kids use Snapchat instead ofInstagram. Facebook’s acquisition of WhatsApp in
`
`February ofthisyear was the transaction that defined this trend.1
`
`Messaging Apps Have Caught Up To Social Networks
`Monthly Active Users For Selected Top 4 Social Networks ‘ And Mesogging Apps‘ ‘
`
`2,500
`
`2,000
`
`1,500
`
`1,000 ’/
`
`500
`
`0
`
`—Big4Sncial Networks
`"-Big 4 Messaging Apps
`
`N'L’L’L’L’B'b’b'bvt-hott‘
`wwww'ywwwxwwwxfi
`Do «,0» 09 '50 :9 N9 '19“ '50 ho «,0 09’ 0,0 b9 «53>
`'1"
`I
`l" '
`I
`l
`E
`i r” J
`ii"
`Suwrr' [rampant-1‘s. ammrmm 'Sm'mt'nrtwnrks' mm.- {mh‘fllm Fareboul, Jnttagmm "Mmsngmg erhrrr, vim Wfinriflpp‘ Farebnnlt Mammy,
`(http://cjrarchive.org/img/posts/tow—content/uploads/Z 01 5/1 1/CHATAPPS_Page6_Chart.png)
`
`l
`
`While Wilson’s Views may be surprising to some, statistics support them. Business Insider
`
`Intelligence released an infographic in April titled “Messaging Apps Have Caught Up to Social
`
`Networks,” indicating that major chat apps (WeChat, Viber, WhatsApp, and Facebook Messenger)
`
`now have more combined users than the top social networks (Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, and
`
`Instagram).2 And according to Mary Meeker’s “Internet Trends 2015” report, messaging apps make
`
`httpszllwww .cj r .org/tow_center_reports/gui de_to_chat_apps.php
`
`4/41
`
`Page 4 of41
`
`Page 4 of 41
`
`

`

`7/13/2017
`
`Guide to Chat Apps - Columbia Journalism Review
`
`up 60 percent of the top 10 global apps by both usage and number of sessions.3 Like any presumed
`
`overnight success, WhatsApp’s rise was actually part of a broader movement that took years to
`
`coalesce within a zeitgeist moment. Facebook’s $22-billion purchase of the app merely marked the
`
`day that everyone, even those with limited interest in technology, learned that the era of social
`
`messaging had arrived.
`
`Any user now downloading the world’s 10 biggest chat apps for the first time may be struck by their
`
`similarities. Dig deeper into their histories, though, and you’ll see that each company conquered the
`
`globe with one unique, core innovation before incorporating some of its competitors’ strongest ideas:
`
`LINE popularized stickers, Viber perfected free mobile calling, Snapchat invented ephemeral
`
`messaging, Kik pioneered mobile chat anonymity, Telegram supplied chat encryption, Tango
`
`delivered mobile Video chat, WhatsApp introduced the simplicity of free texting, and WeChat
`
`created the messaging app as mobile web portal. Facebook Messenger, for its part, forged an
`
`amalgam of all those apps, and now looks to differentiate itself with the introduction of M, an
`
`artificial intelligence chat assistant.
`
`Objectives and Methods
`
`In this guide, we explore the critical role chat apps can play in the distribution of digital journalism
`
`today and in the years ahead. As mobile traffic and referrals from social platforms continue to grow
`
`for the majority of news organizations, chat apps present a profound opportunity for audience
`
`development and engagement.
`
`According to Pew Research Center’s “State of the News Media 201 5 ” report, 78 percent of the top
`
`50 digital news websites receive more visits from mobile devices than desktop computers. And
`
`analytics firm Parse.ly, which delivers audience insights to over 400 news organizations including
`
`Wired, The Atlantic, and Reuters, claims 43 percent of referrals to its publisher network now come
`
`from social media (outpacing search at 38 percent).
`
`Messaging has emerged as the new frontier of social on mobile, and the sheer size of audiences on
`
`the top global chat apps is too big to ignore. These apps also present an opportunity to diversify
`
`mobile traffic sources and to minimize vulnerability should Facebook or other platforms decrease
`
`traffic for publishers.
`
`For our research, we conducted interviews with leadership at numerous major messaging app
`
`companies, as well as early-adopter news organizations. We selected companies and case studies
`
`that demonstrate the diversity of opportunities within the ecosystem, while also highlighting the
`
`uniqueness of each chat app platform.
`
`While publishers generally indicated optimism and excitement for their work on chat apps, nearly all
`
`pointed out that as an industry we are still in an early, exploratory phase. Most major chat apps spent
`
`the last few years perfecting their user experience, only recently turning their attention to media-
`
`owner partnerships. With that in mind, we urge readers to not only learn from the case studies
`
`presented, but also to initiate experiments of their own to find the right strategy for any editorial
`team.
`
`httpszllwww .cj r .org/tow_center_reports/gui de_to_chat_apps.php
`
`5/41
`
`Page 5 of41
`
`Page 5 of 41
`
`

`

`7/13/2017
`
`Guide to Chat Apps - Columbia Journalism Review
`
`A Brief History of Chat Apps
`
`Modern instant messaging and SMS both began their march to prominence in the early and mid-
`
`19908. The difference between the two is subtle: SMS (the acronym for “short service message”)
`
`allows mobile phone users to send each other text messages without an Internet connection,
`
`whereas instant messaging enables similar functionality via the web. The first SMS message was sent
`
`over the Vodafone GSM network in the United Kingdom on December 3, 1992, with the words
`
`“Merry Christmas.” Israeli firm Mirabilis released the first widely used online messenger, ICQ (short
`
`for “1 Seek You”), in 1996.
`
`Precursors to ICQ date as far back as 1961 when MIT’s Computation Center built the Compatible
`
`Time Sharing System (CTSS), allowing up to 30 users to log-in concurrently and share text messages.
`
`CompuServe’s CB Simulator, released in 1980, is generally recognized as the first dedicated online
`
`chat service; it required users to pay monthly fees for membership.
`
`In 1985, Commodore launched Quantum Link (or “Q-Link”), an online service for Commodore 64
`
`and 128 that enabled multi-person chat, file sharing, electronic email, games, and news Via modem
`
`connection. Quantum Link changed its name to America Online (AOL) in 1991, and by the mid—90$
`
`was the leading US. Internet service provider and portal to the web.
`
`The company launched AOL Instant Messenger (AIM) in 1997 and purchased competitor ICQ in
`
`1998 to consolidate its primacy over instant messaging. Along with a few competitors, it also
`
`pioneered chat robots like StudyBuddy and SmarterChild that provided information and played
`
`games with users.
`
`In 2006, AIM controlled 52 percent of the instant messaging market, but it struggled to monetize
`
`and went into rapid decline in the face of competition from services like Google Talk, Yahoo! Chat,
`
`MSN Messenger, and Skype. The growing popularity of BlackBerry Messenger in the late 20008 also
`
`pointed to a bright future for mobile messaging.
`
`By the time mobile chat apps like WhatsApp and Kik arrived in 2009, SMS was king. Mobile texting
`
`became a key mode of global, personal communication, earning billions of dollars for
`
`telecommunications companies.
`
`But time and technology did not prove kind to telephone-service companies. As smartphones began
`
`to proliferate, messaging apps were an increasingly accessible solution to a simple problem: SMS is
`
`expensive in most countries, so why not text or call much more cheaply, or for free, Via the mobile
`web?
`
`SMS volume peaked in 2012, and chat apps surpassed SMS in global message volume for the first
`
`time in 201 3 .4 By January 2015, WhatsApp alone hosted 30 billion messages per day compared to
`about 20 billion for SMS.5
`
`As Wi—Fi and high-speed mobile networks hit critical mass in many markets, chat apps quickly
`
`became multimedia hubs where users could easily share videos, photos, stickers, games, articles, live
`
`streams, and more. Between 2013 and 2014, many messengers turned their attention to monetizing
`
`httpszllwww .cj r .org/tow_center_reports/gui de_to_chat_apps.php
`
`6/41
`
`Page 6 of41
`
`Page 6 of 41
`
`

`

`7/13/2017
`
`Guide to Chat Apps - Columbia Journalism Review
`
`their massive audiences, and in doing so introduced tools for publishers and brands.
`
`Facebook: A Company Reinvented for the Messaging Era
`
`Charting Fucebook's Rapid
`Reinvention at The End of
`
`the Social Networking Era
`
`Focebook Now Has More Accounls On
`
`Chm Apps Than On its Social Network.
`
`0 “Hatred MNJs
`
`F9 Melwngel MALI:
`
`Tc’c‘ E53! A533,"! h‘AL's
`
`httpszllwww .0] r .org/tow_center_reportslgui de_to_chat_apps.php
`
`TIE min. iiifi 17A? Il'i‘zlh‘ba‘f
`.MW’“!"!” .1. 1913‘ W1
`
`Page 7 of41
`
`Page 7 of 41
`
`

`

`7/13/2017
`
`Guide to Chat Apps - Columbia Journalism Review
`
`C‘EET'EEI b,- Elgc': le‘,‘ and lilfllfljlflllfi‘
`
`(http://cjrarchive.org/img/posts/tow—content/uploads/2 01 5/1 1/CHATAPPS_Page 9_Graph- 1.png)
`
`With a mix of foresight and irony, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has done more than most to
`
`close the era of social networking and usher in one of social messaging. In 2014, he placed two
`
`massive bets on messaging: a $22-billion purchase of the world’s leading chat app, WhatsApp, and a
`
`new requirement that Facebook users download a standalone Messenger app to converse with
`friends.
`
`By September 2015, WhatsApp and Messenger had 1.6 billion active, monthly accounts combined—
`
`outpacing Facebook’s 1.49 billion active, monthly accounts. The company also launched an open
`
`API for Messenger, encouraging developers and publishers to build custom apps for the ecosystem. It
`
`simultaneously began beta testing Businesses on Messenger, a tool facilitating e-commerce and
`
`customer support. In August 2015, Instagram, another of Facebook’s acquisitions, launched
`
`enhanced one-to-one messaging—encouraging users to share photos and Videos from the news feed
`
`within private chats.
`
`A Flow from East to West
`
`Despite the boldness of Zuckerberg’s repositioning, Facebook was responding to trends more than
`
`shaping them. A large swath of chat app innovation continues to originate in Asia on platforms like
`
`WeChat and LINE, and Western apps often appropriate those platforms’ best products.
`
`WeChat, in particular, has a monolithic presence in China reminiscent of late 19905 Internet portals
`
`like AOL and Yahoo (with a modern mobile twist). Users not only talk to friends and consume news
`
`on the app, but also make purchases, pay utility bills, book taxis and doctors appointments, enroll in
`
`brand loyalty programs, monitor traffic and air pollution, and report incidents to the police.
`
`That dominance of the mobile web in countries like China might not be as likely in other markets,
`
`but it has served as inspiration for ambitious Western chat apps plotting roadmaps for growth and
`
`monetization. Like WeChat, Japan’s LINE is also incredibly advanced in its product offerings,
`
`grossing $65 6 million in revenue in 2014. By contrast, while leading Western messenger apps may
`
`boast multibillion-dollar valuations, they often have profit and loss sheets in the red.
`
`httpszllwww .0] r .org/tow_center_reports/gui de_to_chat_apps.php
`
`8/41
`
`Page 8 of41
`
`Page 8 of 41
`
`

`

`7/13/2017
`
`Guide to Chat Apps - Columbia Journalism Review
`
`Time will tell if the same winning strategies will work halfway around the world. But for news
`
`organizations in North America and Europe looking for a glimpse of how the market may look in one
`
`to two years, downloading WeChat and LINE is the best place to start.
`
`Regional and Demographic Strongholds
`
`When devising your own strategy for messaging apps, it’s vital to select the right platform mix for
`
`your organization, based on three core criteria:
`
`Regional Strongholds: Only a small group of apps like WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and Viber
`
`can be said to be truly global—and even those platforms struggle in certain countries. Meanwhile,
`
`messengers like WeChat, LINE, and KakaoTalk completely dominate specific markets but have
`
`negligible traction in others.
`
`Demographics: It’s a common misconception that messaging apps are a uniformly millennial
`
`phenomenon. Some apps like Snapchat and LINE skew both young and female, but others like Tango
`
`(which boasts 100 million monthly, active users, by our estimate) predominantly appeal to those
`
`aged 2 5—54 and strongly over—index with Hispanic and African-American users.
`
`Product Features: If your primary goal is to drive traffic directly back to your website, that won’t be
`
`possible with apps like Snapchat that don’t support clickable URL links. And if you want to launch a
`
`sticker/emoji-pack campaign, LINE and Viber are great options, but you can rule out both WhatsApp
`
`and Snapchat. Each app has a particular set of features, so make sure to choose one that supports the
`
`activation you have in mind.
`
`Industry Challenges
`
`Fragmentation: The social media landscape is entering a period of hyper-fragmentation that may
`
`be a challenge to publishers: Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram continue to loom large, but social
`
`media managers can now launch official channels on roughly 10 chat apps with over 50 million
`
`monthly, active users each.BuzzFeed, a perennial innovator in digital audience development,
`
`provides a great example of what it looks like to be on nearly all of these platforms. Starting with the
`
`launch of a share-to-WhatsApp button on mobile in February 2014, BuzzFeed has also built an
`
`official presence on seven additional major messengers, as seen in the timeline below.
`
`Analytics: For organizations accustomed to robust, real-time data, the lack of good analytics tools
`
`for messaging apps remains a major deterrent to adoption. The challenge is twofold: Strong analytics
`
`dashboards take time to build, and many messengers are privacy—centric by nature.The latter issue
`
`has led to an existential crisis for apps keen to remain true to their roots while also attracting brands
`
`and appeasing investors. To the far left, companies like WhatsApp and Telegram have made public
`
`promises to shun personal data collection and advertising. Closer to center, Snapchat and Kik collect
`
`basic information like age and location for ad targeting, but denounce “creepy, ” hyper-targeted ads.
`
`Other platforms like Pinger seem more inclined to offer rich data collection and hyper-targeting of
`
`anonymized users. Specifically, Pinger leverages keyword data to let advertisers reach users based
`
`on their interests.Still, in a landscape increasingly driven by programmatic ambitions and data-
`
`centric decision making, chat apps currently deliver comparatively limited information in basic
`
`httpszllwww .cj r .org/tow_center_reports/gui de_to_chat_apps.php
`
`9/41
`
`Page 9 of41
`
`Page 9 of 41
`
`

`

`7/13/2017
`
`Guide to Chat Apps - Columbia Journalism Review
`
`dashboards, or in some cases via analog reporting. Most are mobilizing to remedy the situation
`
`quickly, and a host of third party services are also beginning to create dashboard solutions based on
`
`the major apps’ willingness to grant API access.
`
`Growing Pains: As messaging apps respond to the demands of spectacular growth, publisher
`
`partners we’ve spoken to have at times found it difficult to get consistent support or answers to
`
`questions about platform capabilities.Apps like Tango have also made large changes to their channel
`
`format for publishers— starting with a news feed that helped drive traffic to content, but
`
`transitioning to chat rooms geared toward discussion. While changes like this are understandable as
`
`part of a process for looking to find experiences that resonate with users, the volatility can be
`
`unsettling.0ther platforms like WhatsApp currently have little interest altogether in providing tools
`
`for publishers. Their emphasis, for the time being, is purely on connecting users to friends and
`
`family. And while this may not technically qualify as a growing pain, it certainly poses logistical
`
`challenges for companies attempting to adapt the app to their needs.
`
`Industry Opportunities
`
`Higher Engagement: Since many chat apps provide publishers with push notifications or chatbot
`
`experiences (programmable robots that converse with users—see glossary), they can deliver
`
`significantly higher engagement rates than Facebook and Twitter. For example, LINE’s Euro-
`
`Americas CEO Ieanie Han claims that 5 5 .8 percent of push notifications sent to followers of official
`
`accounts are read.6 This advantage may erode from its current levels as new publishers compete for
`
`attention on each platform, but message open rates are still likely to supersede social network news
`feeds.
`
`Audience Development: With billions of active users across multiple major chat apps, publishers
`
`have been successful in building large audiences fairly quickly on several platforms.
`
`A Chance to Connect With Users in a New Way: Messaging apps offer a host of features not
`
`unavailable on social networks or other platforms. Publishers can creatively leverage these tools to
`
`tell stories in new ways. For example, Snapchat lets users write and draw on top of content from
`
`publishers before sharing with friends. Companies like BuzzFeed are also experimenting with
`
`publisher-branded emojis that followers use to enhance personal conversations on apps like LINE.
`
`Building Community: Chat apps offer an opportunity for readers and viewers to easily connect,
`
`share, collaborate, and discuss a range of topics. Platforms like Kik and Tango, for example, let
`
`companies host their own chat rooms where readers and viewers can meet and discuss topics of
`
`interest. And Snapchat’s Live Stories allows people in a specific geolocation to contribute eyewitness
`
`media to a crowdsourced video piece the entire Snapchat community can View.
`
`Key Players and Case Studies
`
`For publishers acting as early adopters, 2014 and 2015 has been a period of great experimentation.
`
`In addition to learning the strengths and weaknesses of various platforms, news organizations have
`
`also explored different strategies for adapting their professional voice to an ecosystem filled with
`
`httpszllwww .cj r .org/tow_center_reports/gui de_to_chat_apps.php
`
`1 0/41
`
`Page 10 of4l
`
`Page 10 of 41
`
`

`

`7/13/2017
`
`Guide to Chat Apps - Columbia Journalism Review
`
`emojis, stickers, games, memes, and more.
`
`We’ve taken a look at some of the main messaging platforms and how news organizations use them.
`
`LINE: Japanese Chat App Spins Fun Visuals into Big Profits
`
`Audience: 2 1 1 million monthly, active users
`
`Top Markets: Japan, Taiwan, Thailand, Indonesia, Spain
`
`Demographics: Majority aged 16—34 years
`
`Key Features: Free to use; multimedia file-sharing capability; works across all major mobile phone
`
`platforms and PCs; timeline news feed; official brand accounts with CMS and one daily push alert
`
`limit; stickers, coupons and games for free and paid.
`
`LINE (the official trademark is capitalized) is a Japanese messaging app initially created in response
`
`to the Tokyo earthquake in 201 1 as a means for employees of parent company NHN Japan to stay in
`
`touch. It was released to the public later in the year and experienced significant growth across the
`
`country and in the region, particularly in Thailand, Taiwan, and Indonesia.
`
`It stands out as the most profitable messaging app on the market, with a recent App Annie report
`
`suggesting LINE as the most profitable of any app in June 2015.7 This is in large part due to its hugely
`
`popular games and stickers market, which drive roughly 60 percent and 20 percent of revenue,
`
`respectively. The company reported $656 million (JPY 86.3 billion) in gross revenue for 2014, far
`
`outpacing its competitors.8
`
`LINE has official accounts for brands and publishers, offering them a dedicated CMS browser to
`
`create and manage daily push alerts and content on the account’s home feed.
`
`BuzzFeed Builds LINE Audience with Push Notifications, Stickers, and Comics
`
`BBC News and the The Wall Street Journal are among the news organizations that have a million-
`
`plus subscribers to their LINE accounts, experimenting on different content models around Video
`
`(BBC) and daily alerts and breaking news (The Wall Street Journal). BuzzFeed, a more recent entrant
`
`to the platform, has taken a very different approach.
`
`Bryant Hua, associate social media editor at BuzzFeed, explained the company’s thinking:
`
`LINE is probably one ofthe most exciting messaging apps, becauseyou can send globalpush
`
`messages, but there’s also afeed on the home channel thatyou can publish to. We were more able to
`
`curate the channel in a BuzzFeed way. Comics are one ofthe big areas that we ’repushing into—we
`
`have comics on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram—and this platform in particular seems to be a place
`
`where the audience is reacting well to them.
`
`LINE has its own web browser-based CMS and provides the ability to schedule posts, which makes
`
`managing the account much more eflicient.
`
`httpszllwww .cj r .org/tow_center_reports/gui de_to_chat_apps.php
`
`1 1/41
`
`Page 11 of4l
`
`Page 11 of 41
`
`

`

`7/13/2017
`
`Guide to Chat Apps - Columbia Journalism Review
`
`The BuzzFeed channel rarely links back to its main website, a similar strategy that it employs on
`
`social media platforms, too. Hua added: “We have a more distributed strategy in 2015 and we’re not
`
`totally focused on driving traffic back to the site, so we provide as much information with the feed as
`
`possible.”
`
`One of the most effective ways to attract new subscribers on the platform (as is the case with several
`
`other chat apps) is by using stickers. BuzzFeed debuted its own sticker set, enabling LINE users to
`
`download them for free as long as they subscribed to the BuzzFeed channel. This helped BuzzFeed to
`
`acquire a following of over 200,000 within a few months of launch.
`
`a Q A El m is e" ”'33.
`
`22.E-5i.~_ 12:31 PM
`
`<2
`Add this friend. get this free!
`
`Sticker Details
`
`BuzzFeed
`
`BuzzFeed
`
` Download
`
`LOL, OMS, CUTE and more with BuzzFeed? Friend
`
`BuzzFeed 5; Official fliCCGuI‘it lu get them! Available until
`
`August 24,2015.
`
`httpszllwww .0] r .org/tow_center_reportslgui de_to_chat_apps.php
`
`12/41
`
`Page 12 of4l
`
`Page 12 of 41
`
`

`

`7/13/2017
`
`Guide to Chat Apps - Columbia Journalism Review
`
`
`
`
`
`(http://cjrarchive.org/img/posts/tow-content/uploads/ 201 5/1 1/CHATAPPS_Page15_BF2.png)
`
`LINE also allows users to interact with content using emojis. Instead of clicking a “like” button, users
`
`can choose from a selection of six different emojis to express how they feel about a story or piece of
`
`content (Facebook began testing a similar approach called Reactions in October).9 Interactive polls
`
`and a commenting system also let users respond in text and with stickers, which Hua said is a unique
`
`way that LINE engages with audiences. A recent feature asked users to select the house from Harry
`
`Potter’s Hogwarts which they most fit into; it was one of BuzzFeed’s most engaged posts since the
`channel launched.
`
`---:.':.'--.- Hariznn LTE
`
`1013? AM
`
`BuzzFeed
`belting in?
`
`Which Huwarts huuse dn gnu
`
`httpszllwww .cj r .org/tow_center_reports/gui de_to_chat_apps.php
`
`1 3/41
`
`Page 13 of41
`
`Page 13 of 41
`
`

`

`7/13/2017
`
`Guide to Chat Apps - Columbia Journalism Review
`
`Which Him-warm house do you belong in'iI
`
`
`
`Blythe-rim
`
`1 2-“:
`
`Gfifiindnr
`
`2,543
`
`
`
`Flatter-flaw
`
`1
`
`:~.-:i!_l
`
`HufFIEpufi
`
`|
`
`-n 2
`
`(http://cjrarchive.org/img/posts/tow—content/uploads/2 01 5/1 1/CHATAPPS_Page 1 5_BF3 .png)
`
`Hua openly admitted that hard news hasn’t particularly worked on the LINE channel—headline
`
`bulletins from the news apps team haven’t generated much engagement like they do on some other
`social media channels.
`
`httpszllwww .0] r .org/tow_center_reports/gui de_to_chat_apps.php
`
`14/41
`
`Page 14 of41
`
`Page 14 of 41
`
`

`

`7/13/2017
`
`Guide to Chat Apps - Columbia Journalism Review
`
`The experience is in direct contrast with the LINE channels of BBC News and The Wall Street
`
`journal. Both of these accounts passed the one—million-subscriber mark earlier this year. The
`
`difference in how audiences engage with news on their channels, compared to that of Buzzfeed’s, is
`
`potentially attributable to subscribers’ different expectations from the brands, with Buzzfeed more
`
`typically offering large slices of humor and viral memes alongside some news content.
`
`WeChat: China’s Tencent Reinvents the Web Portal for Mobile
`
`Audience: 600 million monthly, active users
`
`Top Markets: China, Malaysia, Hong Kong, India, Taiwa

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket