throbber
Volume 121
`Number 2
`
`Clinical and laboratory observations
`
`259
`
`Plasma glutamine concentration: A guide in the
`management of urea cycle disorders
`
`NancyE. Maestri, PhD, Kathryn D. McGowan, mpD,* and SaulW. Brusilow, MD
`From the Department of Pediatrics, Jonns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
`
`Becauseincreasesin plasma giutamine concentrations are almost always as-
`sociated with hyperammonemia in patients with urea cycle disorders, we deter-
`mined the correlation between these two variables for 2 years in a child with or-
`nithine transcarbamylase deficiency. Acorrelation coefficient of 0.77 (p <0.0004)
`was found. Hyperammonemia was rarely observed when plasma glutamine
`levels were near normal. These data suggest that one goal of therapyis the
`maintenance of plasma glutamine levels at or near normal values. (J PEDIATR
`1992;424:259-64)
`
`
`
`The presence of hyperglutaminemia in hyperammonemic
`patients with urea cycle disorders has been knownsince the
`earliest case reports! and is another manifestation of the
`disorder of nitrogen homeostasis.*? Moreover,
`in two
`patients with ornithine transcarbamylasedeficiency, plasma
`glutamine levels increased before the onset of hyperam-
`monemia.* Hyperglutaminemiais also associated with the
`hyperammonemia of severe liver disease’ and Reye syn-
`drome.® On the basis of these observations,
`this study
`examined the relationship between the plasma glutamine
`and ammonium concentrations during a 24-month period in
`one patient with the neonatal form of OTC deficiency.
`CASE REPORT
`
`The patient was the younger brother of a boy with OTC
`deficiency who, after rescue from neonatal hyperammonemic
`coma, was profoundly developmentally delayed and died in hyper-
`ammonemic comaat age 16 months of age. The mother was iden-
`tified as a carrier of the mutation at the OTC locus on the basis of
`
`the diagnosis of the proband and a positive protein tolerancetest
`result. More recently, the mutation in this pedigree has been iden-
`tified as a T—Csubstitution in theinitial dinucleotide ofintron 7,
`resulting in a deletion of exon 7.’ The family waslost to follow-up
`until the mother was 26 weeks’ pregnant with a fetus of unknown
`
`Supported by National Institutes of Health grants HD 11134, HD
`26358, and RR 00052, U.S. Food and Drug Administration grant
`No. FD-R-000198, the T. D. and M. A. O’Malley Foundation, and
`the Kettering Family Foundation.
`Submitted for publication Nov. 15, 1991; accepted Feb. 25, 1992.
`Reprint requests: Saul W. Brusilow, MD, Department of Pediat-
`rics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Park
`Building Room 336, Baltimore, MD 21205.
`*Now at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns
`Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205.
`9/22/37448
`
`gender. After genetic counseling, during which the options for di-
`agnosis and treatment weredescribed,* the family chose delivery
`at their local community hospital and declined to enter the infant
`into an experimental diagnostic and treatment protocol. After de-
`livery, notwithstanding the earlier decision, the apparently healthy
`term male neonate was not fed enterally but was given only intra-
`venousfluids including 10% glucose solution. On discharge from
`the community hospital when the infant was 48 hoursof age, the
`parents chose to seek therapy and the patient was broughtdirectly
`to Johns Hopkins Hospital. On arrival he was lethargic and had
`plasma ammonium and glutaminelevels, respectively, of 117 and
`2074 wmol/L (normal values <30 and 613 + 15)%; plasmacitrul-
`line was undetectable. He also had a plasmaorotate level of 2:13
`
`OTC Ornithine transcarbamylase
`
`pmol/L (undetectable in normal neonates [Brusilow SW: unpub-
`lished observations]) and a respiratory alkalosis. After. further
`counseling, the parents gave informed consent for the patient’s en-
`try into a study evaluating the intravenous dosage form of benzoate
`and phenylacetate, and long-term therapy with the oral dosage
`form of sodium phenylbutyrate. At 24 and 48 hours after intrave-
`nous therapy,!° the patient’s plasma ammonium levels were,
`respectively, 31 and 24 pmol/L.
`In the subsequent 2 years the patient has been treated with a low
`protein diet (at times supplemented with essential amino acids),
`L-citrulline, 175 mg/kg per day, and sodium phenylbutyrate, 500
`to 600 mg/kg per day. The details and variations of this protocol
`are described elsewhere.!° On the Cattell Infant Intelligence Scale
`his development quotient was 80 at 19 months of age. The patient
`is at the 25th percentile for weight and below the 3rd percentile for
`height. He has been admitted to the hospital three times because
`of symptomatic hyperammonemia.
`
`METHODS
`
`During the 2-year follow-up period, 57 measurements
`were madeof plasma ammonium and aminoacid levels. In-
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`Horizon Exhibit 2011
`
`Par v. Horizon
`
`IPR2017-01768
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`Horizon Exhibit 2011
`Par v. Horizon
`IPR2017-01768
`
`

`

`260
`
`Clinical and laboratory observations
`
`The Journal of Pediatrics
`August 1992
`
`
`
`
`
`PlasmaGlutamine(uM)
`
`2400
`
`2100
`
`1800
`
`1500
`
`1200
`
`900
`
`600
`
`300
`
`
`
`60
`
`90
`
`120
`
`150
`
`Piasma Ammonium (uM)
`
`
`
`The findings of a weaker correlation between plasma
`ammonium and glutamine levels when plasma ammonium
`levels are normal are consistent with the hypothesis that in-
`creased plasma glutamine levels are forerunners of in-
`creased plasma ammoniumlevels.* These data, in conjunc-
`tion with the reports cited earlier, suggest that glutamine
`may represent a storagesite for nitrogen accumulation. The
`precise capacity of glutamine to serve this function is
`unknown,but it appears that as plasma glutaminelevels in-
`crease to greater’than normal, there is a greaterlikelihood
`of hyperammonemia. Although the plasma level of glu-
`tamine above which ammonium accumulatedin this patient
`was approximately 1000 umol/L, our random observations
`of other patients suggest, as might be expected, that there
`maybe considerable individualvariability of this threshold.
`These data have potentially useful monitoring and ther-
`apeutic implications. They suggest that increasing plasma
`glutamine levels may indicate that dietary or drug therapy
`requires modification. Such modifications include an in-
`creased dose of phenylbutyrate, an increased calorie intake,
`a reduction of total nitrogen intake, and redistribution of
`nitrogen intake between natural protein and essential amino
`acids to take advantageof the lower nitrogen density of es-
`sential amino acids.
`
`Figure. Relationship between plasma glutamine and ammonium concentrations. For all values the Pearson correlation
`coefficient is 0.77 (p <0.0001). For plasma ammonium valuesless than 30 wmol/L (p = 0.436; p <0.0001).
`
`high. Furthermore, the height of the plasma ammonium
`. level was strongly correlated with the height of the plasma
`glutamine concentration.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`cluded in this study are those values obtained during all
`outpatient visits. Plasma ammonium levels were measured
`by a cation exchange-visible spectrophotometric tech-
`nique,!! and plasma amino acids were measured by auto-
`mated column chromatography using a Beckman model
`6300 amino acid analyzer (Beckman Instruments, Inc.,
`Brea, Calif.). Apart from the initial sample, blood wascol-
`lected from the patient during daytime hours (plasma glu-
`tamine levels are lowest then in patients treated with this
`protocol!?), Blood was placed in heparinized tubes and im-
`mediately chilled on ice, and the plasma was promptly sep-
`arated in a refrigerated centrifuge and analyzed immedi-
`ately or frozen for analysis within 24 hours.
`
`RESULTS
`
`The relationship between plasma levels of ammonium
`and glutamine in this patient is shown in the Figure. The
`Pearson correlation coefficient for all values of glutamine
`and ammonium wascalculated as 0.77 (p <0.0001), When
`plasma ammonium levels were within the normal range
`(<30 pmol/L), glutamine levels varied between 145 and
`1090 pmol/L and were more weakly correlated with plasma
`ammonium levels (o = 0.436; p <0.0001).
`Plasma glutamine measurements were grouped into six
`strata, and the mean glutamine and‘4rimoniumlevels were
`calculated. As shown in the Table, the mean ammonium
`level was normalfor glutamine values less than 800 umol/L;
`however, when plasma glutaminelevels increased above this
`level, an increasing percentage of ammonium levels. were
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`Volume 121
`Number 2
`
`Clinical and laboratory observations
`
`261
`
`Table. Number of high (>30 wmol/L) plasma ammonium levels for specified plasma glutamine levels
`
`Mean Gin
`Range of Gin
`(umol/L)*
`fn
`«amot/L)
`295 + 62.8
`12
`200-400
`8
`L
`21.8 + 7.0
`6
`1
`21.3 4 4.8
`503 + 61.3
`16
`401-600
`690 + 51.8
`13
`601-800
`0
`0
`21.5 441
`40
`2
`34.8 + 15.4
`892 + 66.8
`5
`801-1000
`1190 + 84.0
`7
`1001-1400
`86
`6
`55.0 + 36.3
`
`
`
`4 1829 + 302.8>1400 100 110.8 + 40.4 4
`
`
`
`Mean NH,+
`(umol/L)*
`
`No.
`
`%
`
`NH,* >30 uwmol/L
`
`
`
`cirrhosis: relation to other manifestations of liver disease.
`Gastroenterology 1978;75:570-9.
`. Romshe CA, Hilty MD, McClung J, Kerzner B, Reiner CB.
`Amino acid pattern in Reye’s syndrome: comparison with
`clinically similar entities. J PEDIATR 1981;98:788-90.
`. Carstens RP, Fenton WP, Rosenberg LF. Identification of
`RNAsplicing errors resulting in ornithine transcarbamylase
`deficiency. Am J Hum Genet 1991;48:1105-14.
`. Maestri NE, Hauser ER, Bartholomew D, Brusilow SW.Pro-
`spective treatment of urea cycle disorders. J PEDIATR 1991;
`119:923-8.
`. Batshaw ML,Brusilow SW. Asymptomatic hyperammonemia
`in low birth weight infants. Pediatr Res 1978;12:221-4,
`Brusilow SW. Treatment of urea cycle disorders. In: Desnick
`R, ed. Treatment of genetic diseases. New York: Churchill
`Livingstone 1991:79-94,
`Brusilow SW. Determination of urine orotate and orotidine
`and plasma ammonium. In: Hommes FA, ed. Techniques in
`diagnostic human biochemical genetics. New York: Wiley
`Liss, 1991:345-57.
`Brusilow SW. Phenylacetylglutamine may replace urea as a
`vehicle for waste nitrogen excretion, Pediatr Res 1991;29:147-
`50.
`
`10.
`
`Li.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`Hawkins RA,Jessy J. Hyperammonemia does not impair brain
`function in the absence of net glutamine synthesis. Biochem J
`1991;27:697-703.
`Takahashi H, Koehler RC, Brusilow SW, Traystman RJ. In-
`hibition of brain glutamine accumulation prevents cerebral
`edema in hyperammonemic rats. Am J Physiol 1991;
`261:H825-9.
`
`Gin, Glutamine; NH,*, ammonium.
`*Values are mean + SD.
`
`These findings may have broadersignificance in view of
`recent reports suggesting that glutamine may be more
`closely related to the pathophysiology of the encephalopa-
`thy of hyperammonemia than is ammonium.!*!4
`
`Wethank the nursingstaff of the pediatric clinical research unit
`for their help in obtaining plasma specimens. Wealso thank Mrs.
`Ellen Gordes for her expert technical assistance in performing
`measurements of plasma ammonium.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`L.
`
`2.
`
`Levin B, Oberholzer VG, Sinclair L. Biochemical investiga-
`tions of hyperammonemia. Lancet 1969;2:170-4.
`Brusilow SW, Horwich A. Urea cycle enzymes. In: Scriver CR,
`Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, eds. The metabolic basis of in-
`herited disease. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1989:629-
`44,
`
`. Arn PH, Hauser ER, Thomas GH, Herman G,HessD,Brusi-
`low SW. Hyperammonemia in women with a mutation at the
`ornithine transcarbamylase locus: a cause of postpartum coma.
`N Engl J Med 1990;322:1652-5.
`. Batshaw ML, Walser M, Brusilow SW. Plasma a-keto-
`glutarate in urea cycle enzymopathies and its role as a har-
`binger of hyperammonemic coma. Pediatr Res 1980;14:
`1316-9,
`
`. Ansley JD, Isaacs JW, Rikkers LF, Kutner MH, Nordlinger
`BM, Rudman D.Quantitative tests of nitrogen metabolism in
`
`Page3 of 3
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket