throbber
The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org at STANFORD UNIVERSITY on June 29, 2015. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` From the NEJM Archive. Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`Page 1 of 6
`
`Horizon Exhibit 2030
`Par v. Horizon
`IPR2017-01768
`
`

`

`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org at STANFORD UNIVERSITY on June 29, 2015. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` From the NEJM Archive. Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`Page 2 of 6
`
`

`

`l5ll2
`
`'I'III". NEW ENGLANDJUURNAI. OF MEDICINE
`
`June 7, HIM
`
`Table 2. Rating Scales for Cerebral Abnormalities Demonstrated
`by CT Scan.
`nomtal
`(i
`minimally prominent
`moderately prominent
`markedly prominent
`normal
`minimally diluted
`moderately dilated
`markedly dilated
`nomad
`witcortical low density
`scattered areas of low density
`confluent areas of low demity
`
`Conical sulci
`
`Vcntricles
`
`Brain substance
`
`IIIIIIil
`
`0
`
`123
`
`fll1llll
`
`0l2 3
`
`died before one year ofage and are not included in this
`paper. Four additional patients who have since died
`are included: one deficient
`in carbamyl phosphate
`synthctasc, one in ornithine transcarbamylasc, one in
`argininosuccinate synthetase, and one in argininosuc—
`cinase. Two of the deaths resulted from intercurrcnt
`
`hyperammonemic coma, one occurred after an acci-
`dental 10-fold overdose ofintravenous sodium benzo—
`
`ate and sodium phenylacetate during an episode of
`hyperammoncmia, and one resulted from aspiration
`pneumonia. Postmortem examinations were not per-
`mitted in any of these children.
`
`Neurologlc Function
`
`Table 3 shows that of the ‘24 children, 19 (79 per
`cent) had one or more developmental disabilities: 46
`per cent had cerebral palsy, 79 per cent were mentally
`retarded, I7 per cent had seizure disorders, 54 per cent
`had microcephaly, and one child was blind; 46 per
`cent had more than one handicapping condition. The
`most recent IQ was 43:6 (mean tS.E.M.). Twenty-
`one per cent (live) ofthe children had an IQ above 70;
`broken down by type ofdeliciency, the percentages of
`children with an IQ above 70 were as follows: carba-
`myl phosphate synthctase, 0 per cent; ornithine trans-
`carbamylase, 60 per cent; argininosuccinate synthe-
`tase, I2 per cent; and argininosuccinase, 12 per cent.
`Four of these five children had an attention-deficit
`
`disorder. A paired t-test was performed on the change
`between IQ at 12 months and the most recent IQ
`(mean, 35:4 months; range, 19 to 74) in 19 children.
`The. IQ decreased by 8.6125 points (I’<0.0I) during
`this period.
`Figure 3 shows the relation between duration of
`Stage III or IV neonatal hyperammoncmic coma and
`
`niutn level versus (IT-scan rating. The peak ammoniunt level was
`defined as the highest recorded plasma ammonium level during
`neonatal coma; peak values in the patients have been reported pre-
`viously.2 Excluded frotn these analyses (other than CT versus con-
`current IQ) were two patients wlto were in a coma for
`l2 and
`30 days.
`In addition, a paired t-test was used to determine the significance
`ol‘changcs in IQ frotn l2 months to follow-up at 19 to 74 months.
`Excluded from this analysis were the four children younger than Ill
`months. Also excluded was a child who had an episode ofhypt-ram-
`tnonetnie coma at I2 months, associated with Stage IV (‘t)lll:l and
`increased intracranial pressure. This child's IQ fell from 78 to If)
`and was deemed outside the range we were considering clinically.
`This study was performed between I978 and |982 and involved a
`collaborative effort among 26 medical
`institutions in the United
`States and Europe. Parental consent was obtained, and the study
`was approved by the Joint Committee on Clinical Investigation at
`Johns Hopkins Hospital and by the institutional review hoards of
`participating hospitals.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Mortality
`
`Six of 26 patients died during the study. Two male
`infants with ornithine transcarbamylasc deficiency
`
`
`
`Figure 2. CT Scans in Three Children with Complete Urea-Cycle Enzyme Deficiencies.
`Sean A shows mildly dilated ventricles (CT rating. 1.0) in a 24-month-old child with a deficiency of ornithine transcarbamylase. Scan B
`shows mild ventriculomegaly and patchy areas of parenchymal low density (CT rating, 2.5) in a six-month—old infant with argininosuccin-
`ase deficiency. Scan C shows ventriculomegaly, prominent sulci. and subcortical low-density areas (CT rating. 5.0) in a 14-month-old
`child with argininosuccinase deficiency.
`mmmmumm
`WmmaflmWmmmfl.ml5.mmflmufl.mflwmmm
`memm.womtuumwsm.umm.
`
`Page 3 of 6
`
`

`

`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org at STANFORD UNIVERSITY on June 29, 2015. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` From the NEJM Archive. Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`Page 4 of 6
`
`

`

`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org at STANFORD UNIVERSITY on June 29, 2015. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` From the NEJM Archive. Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`Page 5 of 6
`
`

`

`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org at STANFORD UNIVERSITY on June 29, 2015. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` From the NEJM Archive. Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`Page 6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket