throbber
(12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)
`
`(19) World Intellectual Property Organization
`International Bureau
`
`4 March 2010 (04.03.2010) (10) International Publication Number
`
`(43) International Publication Date
`
`WO 2010/025303 A1
`
`
`(51)
`
`(21)
`
`International Patent Classification:
`
`G01N 33/50 (2006.01)
`
`International Application N umber:
`PCT/US2009/05 525 6
`
`(74)
`
`(22)
`
`International Filing Date:
`
`27 August 2009 (27.08.2009)
`
`(81)
`
`(25)
`
`(26)
`
`(30)
`
`(71)
`
`Filing Language:
`
`Publication Language:
`
`Priority Data:
`29 August 2008 (29.08.2008)
`61/093,234
`7 January 2009 (07.01.2009)
`12/350,111
`PCT/USO9/30362 7 January 2009 (07.01.2009)
`
`English
`
`English
`
`US
`US
`US
`
`Applicant 0’or all designated States except US): HYPE-
`RION THERAPEUTICS [US/US]; 601 Gateway Boule-
`vard, Suite 200, South San Francisco, CA 94080 (US).
`
`(84)
`
`(72)
`(75)
`
`Inventor; and
`Inventor/Applicant (for US only): SCHARSCHMIDT,
`Bruce [US/US]; Hyperion Therapeutics, 601 Gateway
`
`Boulevard, Suite 200, South San Francisco, CA 94080
`(US).
`
`Agents: SMITH, Michael, G. et a1.; Morrison & Foerster
`LLP, 12531 High Bluff Drive, Suite 100, San Diego, CA
`92130-2040 (US).
`
`Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every
`kind ofnationalprotection available): AE, AG, AL, AM,
`AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ,
`CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO,
`DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT,
`HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP,
`KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD,
`ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI,
`NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD,
`SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT,
`TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW.
`
`Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, fiar every
`kind afregional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH,
`GM, KE, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM,
`ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ,
`TM), European (AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE,
`
`[Continued on nextpage/
`
`(54) Title: DOSING AND MONITORING PATIENTS ON NITROGEN—SCAVENGING DRUGS
`
`(57) Abstract: The invention provides a method for determining a dose and
`dosing schedule, and making dose adjustments of patients taking PBA pro-
`drugs as nitrogen scavengers to treat nitrogen retention states, including am-
`monia acctunulation disorders as well as chronic renal failure, by measuring
`urinary excretion of phenylacetylglutamine and/or total urinary nitrogen. The
`invention provides methods to select an appropriate dosage of a PBA prodrug
`based on the patient's dietary protein intake, or based on previous treatments
`administered to the patient. The methods are applicable to selecting or modi-
`fying a dosing regimen for a subject receiving an orally administered waste
`nitrogen scavenging drug, and to monitoring patients receiving such drugs.
`
`Figure 1 a
`Nitrogen Retention States
`Human Nitrogen Retention States: Hereditary (UCDs) And
`Acquired (Cirrhosis) Liver Disease And Chronic Renal Failure (CFtF)
`
`HereditaryUJCDs) and
`Acquired (Cirrhosis)
`leer Disorders
`
`chronic Renal
`l-allule (cur)
`
`
`dielary
`
`pruiern '
`
`
`
`Figure lb
`The Urea Cy cle
`
`Sorlilim Fhenlyhutyvate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 99
`
`Horizon Exhibit 2042
`
`Par v. Horizon
`
`IPR2017-01768
`
`
`
`we2010/025303A1|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
`
`Page 1 of 99
`
`Horizon Exhibit 2042
`Par v. Horizon
`IPR2017-01768
`
`

`

`WO 2010/025303 A1 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
`
`ES, Fl, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, LV,
`MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, R0, SE, SI, SK, SM,
`TR), OAP1(BF, BJ, CF, CG, C1, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW,
`ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG).
`Published:
`
`— with international search report (Art. 21(3))
`
`— before the expiration of the time limit for amending the
`Claims and to be republished in the event of receipt of
`amendments (Rule 48.2(h))
`
`Page 2 of 99
`
`Page 2 of 99
`
`

`

`WO 2010/025303
`
`PCT/US2009/055256
`
`DOSING AND MONITORING PATIENTS ON NITROGEN-SCAVENGING DRUGS
`
`Cross-Reference to Related Applications
`
`[0001] This application is a continuation in part of U .S. Nonprovisional Patent Application
`
`Serial No. 12/350,111, filed January 7, 2009 which is pending, and a continuation in part of
`
`International Application No. PCT/USO 8/30362, filed January 9, 2009, each of which claims
`
`benefit of priority to US. Provisional Application Serial Number 61/093,234, filed August 29,
`
`2008, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is also
`
`related to the US. provisional patent application entitled “Treating special populations having liver
`
`disease with nitrogen-scavenging compounds,” naming Sharron Gargosky as inventor, serial
`
`number 61/048,830, filed on April 29, 2008.
`
`Technical Field
`
`[0002] This invention relates to treatment of patients with nitrogen retention states, including
`
`urea cycle disorders (UCDs), cirrhosis complicated by hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and chronic
`
`renal failure (CRF), using administered compounds that assist in elimination of waste nitrogen
`
`from the body. The compounds can be orally administered small-molecule drugs, and the
`
`invention provides methods for delivering such compounds and selecting suitable dosages for a
`
`patient as well as adjusting dosages and monitoring effectiveness of a treatment. As depicted in
`
`Figure la, inherited disorders (e.g., UCDs) and acquired disorders (e.g. cirrhosis, typically with
`
`portal systemic shunting, complicated by HE) involving the liver which impair the normally
`
`efficient clearance of ammonia from the portal circulation and conversion to urea via the urea
`
`cycle, depicted in Figure 1b, result in elevated levels in the blood of ammonia, a potent neurotoxin.
`
`CRF, while associated in some instances with mildly elevated levels of ammonia, (Deferrari, Kid
`
`@1980; 20505), results in retention of other nitrogenous waste products normally excreted in the
`
`urine, in particular urea, the blood levels of which are commonly used to assess renal function.
`
`[0003] Restriction of dietary protein (i.e. intake of dietary nitrogen) is commonly used in the
`
`management of each of these nitrogen rctcntion states, to avoid accumulation of ammonia or
`
`metabolic products containing ammonia, e.g., urea. References herein to ammonia and ammonia
`
`Page 3 of 99
`
`Page 3 of 99
`
`

`

`WO 2010/025303
`
`PCT/US2009/055256
`
`scavenging refer primarily to treating UCDs and HE and conditions that emulate UCDs, although
`
`the tenns ammonia scavenging and waste nitrogen scavenging are used interchangeably.
`
`Background Art
`
`[0004] Drug dosing is usually based upon measurement of blood levels of the active drug
`
`species in conjunction with clinical assessment of treatment response. However, the present
`
`invention is based on evidence that for certain prodrugs of phenylacetic acid (PAA), measuring the
`
`blood level of the prodrug (e. g. PBA) or of PAA formed from it is unreliable in assessing drug
`
`effect: drug levels in the blood do not correlate with efficacy in this case. In addition, assessment
`
`of treatment effect by measuring levels of ammonia in the blood in UCD patients is also potentially
`
`unreliable. Individual ammonia level measurements vary several-fold over the course of a day for
`
`a given patient, and Withdrawing multiple blood samples under carefully controlled conditions over
`
`an extended period of time is clinically impractical as a way to monitor a treated patient. The
`
`variability in blood ammonia levels reflects the fact that ammonia levels in UCD patients are
`
`affected by various factors including dietary protein and timing in relation to meals, such that any
`
`individual value fails to provide a reliable measure of how much ammonia the drug is mobilizing
`
`for elimination; i.e. drug effect. The invention demonstrates that prodrugs of phenylbutyric acid
`
`(PBA) behave similarly to sodium PBA, in that measuring PBA levels is unreliable for assessing
`
`their effectiveness. This invention provides a novel method for dosing in patients with nitrogen
`
`retention states, in particular patients with liver disease and clinical manifestations of hepatic
`
`encephalopathy and patients With UCDs. It is particularly applicable to prodrugs that liberate or
`
`are metabolized to form phenylacetic acid, i.e., prodrugs of FAA, and those prodrugs that are
`
`metabolized to form PBA.
`
`[0005] Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) refers to a reversible spectrum of neurologic signs and
`
`symptoms which frequently occur in patients with cirrhosis or certain other types of liver disease.
`
`[0006] Urea cycle disorders (UCDs) comprise several inherited deficiencies of enzymes or
`
`transporters necessary for the synthesis of urea from ammonia. The urea cycle is depicted in Figure
`
`1b, Which also illustrates how certain ammonia-scavenging drugs act to assist in elimination of
`
`excessive ammonia. UCDs include inherited conditions associated with insufficient function of
`
`any one of several ammonia—processing enzymes. Individuals born with no meaningful residual
`
`urea synthetic capacity typically present in the first few days of life (neonatal presentation).
`
`Individuals with residual function typically present later in childhood or even in adulthood, and
`
`2
`
`Page 4 of 99
`
`Page 4 of 99
`
`

`

`WO 2010/025303
`
`PCT/US2009/055256
`
`symptoms may be precipitated by increased dietary protein or physiological stress (e. g. intercurrent
`
`illness.) Some enzymes whose deficient functioning causes UCDs include the following:
`
`0 Carbamyl phosphate synthetase (CPS),
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC),
`
`argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS),
`
`argininosuccinate lyase (ASL),
`
`arginase (ARG; EC Number 3.5.3.1; autosomal recessive), (ARG) and
`
`0 N-acetyl glutamine synthetase (NAGS)
`
`[0007] Mitochondrial transporter deficiency states which mimic many features of urea cycle
`
`enzyme deficiencies, and thus emulate UCDs and are treatable by the methods described herein for
`
`treating UCDs, include the following:
`
`0 Ornithine translocase deficiency (hyperornithinemia, hyperammonemia, homocitrullinuria
`
`or HHH Syndrome)
`
`0 Citrin (aspartate glutamate transporter) deficiency
`
`[0008] The common feature of UCDs and similar conditions and hepatic encephalopathy that
`
`render them treatable by methods of the invention is an accumulation of excess waste nitrogen in
`
`the body, and hyperammonemia. CRF is similarly characterized by build-up of excessive waste
`
`nitrogen in the blood in the form urea, and the ammonia scavenging drugs described herein are
`
`likewise effective to prevent accumulation of excess levels of urea. In normal individuals, the
`
`body’s intrinsic capacity for waste nitrogen excretion is greater than the body’s waste nitrogen
`
`production, so waste nitrogen does not accumulate and ammonia does not build up to harmful
`
`levels. For patients with nitrogen rctcntion states such as UCD or HE, the body’s intrinsic capacity
`
`for waste nitrogen excretion is less than the body’s waste nitrogen production based on a normal
`
`diet that contains significant amounts of protein. As a result, waste nitrogen builds up in the body
`
`of a patient having a nitrogen retention disorder, which usually results in excess ammonia in the
`
`blood. This has various toxic effects; drugs that help eliminate the excess ammonia are an
`
`important part of an overall management strategy for such disorders.
`
`[0009] To avoid build-u p of ammonia to toxic levels in patients with nitrogen retention states,
`
`dietary intake of protein (a primary source of exogenous waste nitrogen) must be balanced by the
`
`patient’s ability to eliminate excess ammonia. Dietary protein can be limited, but a healthy diet
`
`requires sufficient protein to support normal growth (i.e. in growing children) and repair; thus in
`
`3
`
`Page 5 of 99
`
`Page 5 of 99
`
`

`

`WO 2010/025303
`
`PCT/US2009/055256
`
`addition to controlling dietary protein intake, drugs that assist with elimination of nitrogen are used
`
`to reduce ammonia build-up (hyperammonemia). The capacity to eliminate excess ammonia in
`
`treated patients can be considered the sum of the patient’s endogenous capacity for nitrogen
`
`elimination (if any) plus the amount of additional nitrogen—elimination capacity that is provided by
`
`a nitrogen scavenging drug. The methods of the invention use a variety of different drugs that
`
`reduce excess waste nitrogen and ammonia by converting it to readily-excreted forms, such as
`
`phcnylacctyl glutaminc (PAGN). In some embodiments, the invention relates to methods for
`
`determining or adjusting a dosage of an oral drug that forms PAA in vivo, which is converted into
`
`PAGN, which is then excreted in urine and thus helps eliminate excess nitrogen.
`
`[0010] Based on prior studies in individual UCD patients (e. g. Brusilow, Pediatric Research,
`
`vol. 29, 147—50 (1991); Brusilow and Finkelstien, J. Metabolism, vol. 42, 1336—39 (1993)) in
`
`which 80-90% of the nitrogen scavenger sodium phenylbutyrate (a PAA prodrug) was reportedly
`
`excreted in the urine as PAGN, current treatment guidelines typically either assume complete
`
`conversion of sodium phenylbutyrate or other PAA prodrugs to PAGN (e. g. Berry et al., L
`
`Pediatrics, vol. 138, 856—861 (2001)) or do not comment on the implications of incomplete
`
`conversion for dosing (e. g. Singh, Urea Cycle Disorders Conference Group ‘Consensus Statement
`
`from a Conference for the Management of Patients with Urea Cycle Disorders’, Sup pl to J
`
`Pediatrics, vol. 138(1), 81-85 (2001)). Based on what is known, one expects essentially complete
`
`conversion of these drugs into urinary PAGN.
`
`[0011] PBA is currently the preferred nitrogen scavenging drug for UCD patients in need of
`
`substantial nitrogen elimination capacity. Current treatment guidelines recommend 4 times per day
`
`dosing with PBA, based on the fact that PBA is absorbed rapidly from the intestine when
`
`administered in the form of sodium PBA and exhibits a short half life in the bloodstream (Urea
`
`Cycle Disorders Conference Group ‘Consensus Statement’ 2001). Current recommendations for
`
`sodium phenylbutyrate dosing in UCD patients indicate that dosage should not exceed 600 mg/kg
`
`(for patients weighing up to 20 kg) or in any case 20 grams total per day. Frequent dosing helps
`
`minimize the peak levels of ammonia, which can be very harmful, and it minimizes buildup of high
`
`concentrations of PAA as well.
`
`[0012] CRF (chronic renal failure) resulting from a variety of causes (e. g. diabetes,
`
`hypertension, glomerular disease, etc.) is associated with diminished excretion from the body of
`
`water soluble waste products normally present in the urine, including nitrogenous waste such as
`
`urea. While the contribution of increased blood levels of urea, per se, to the clinical manifestations
`
`Page 6 of 99
`
`Page 6 of 99
`
`

`

`WO 2010/025303
`
`PCT/US2009/055256
`
`of CRF and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) known as uremia is uncertain, urea levels in the blood
`
`are commonly used as one measure of renal function and the need for and frequency of renal
`
`replacement therapy such as dialysis. As a corollary of the findings noted above in UCD patients
`
`(e. g. Brusilow, Pediatric Research, vol. 29, 147—50 (1991); Brusilow and Finkelstien, L
`
`Metabolism, vol. 42, 1336-39 (1993)), increased waste nitrogen excretion in the form of PAGN
`
`resulting from administration of PAA prodrugs decreases urea synthesis and therefore can serve as
`
`an alternative to urca cxcrction. Consistent with this, Brusilow (US Patent # 4,284,647) has
`
`demonstrated that administration of sodium benzoate, which increases waste nitrogen excretion in
`
`the form of hippuric acid, lowered blood urea levels in a patient with renal failure (Figure 14).
`
`Accordingly, PAA prodrugs, including PBA and HPN-100 can be used to treat CRF as well as
`
`UCDs and HE, and methods for determining and adjusting dosage of these PAA prodrugs and
`
`monitoring treatment efficacy are among the inventions disclosed herein. In general, and without
`
`being limited by theory, prodrugs of PAA which do not contain sodium would be preferred for
`
`treatment of treatment of those nitrogen retention states, including CRF as well as cirrhosis and
`
`HE, which are also known to be associated with sodium and fluid retention manifested, for
`
`example, as ascites and or peripheral edema. HPN-100 is one such sodium-free PAA prodrug.
`
`Disclosure of Embodiments of the Invention
`
`[0013] The invention provides a novel approach for determining and adjusting the schedule
`
`and dose of orally administered nitrogen scavenging drugs, including sodium phenylbutyrate and
`
`glyceryl tri-[4-phenylbutyrate] (HPN- 100), based upon the urinary excretion of the drug metabolite
`
`phenylacetylglutamine (PAGN) and/or total urinary nitrogen. It is based in part on the discovery
`
`that bioavailability of these drugs as conventionally assessed based on systemic blood levels of the
`
`drugs themselves or of the active species produced in vivo from these drugs does not accurately
`
`predict removal of waste nitrogen or reduction of plasma ammonia in healthy human volunteers,
`
`adults with liver disease, or patients with UCDs receiving ammonia scavenging drugs as defined
`
`below. Conversion of orally administered sodium phenylbutyrate (NaPB A, or sodium PBA) to
`
`urinary PAGN (uPAGN) is now shown to be incomplete: conversion is typically about 40—70%, or
`
`about 54% on average.
`
`(A preliminary analysis suggested the range would be around 60—75%, but
`
`final analysis shows the average is about 54%.) The average value of about 54% conversion was
`
`determined experimentally for orally administered HPN-100 or PBA converting into urinary
`
`PAGN, and a range of about 40-70% represents the average plus or minus approximately one
`
`5
`
`Page 7 of 99
`
`Page 7 of 99
`
`

`

`WO 2010/025303
`
`PCT/US2009/055256
`
`standard deviation for this data set. By comparison, correlating urinary PAGN with drug dosage
`
`using information available in the art would have provided substantially different results, since the
`
`prior art suggests a much higher conversion, e.g., 90% or more. As used in this context, “about
`
`54%” refers to a value between 50% and 60%, and the urinary PAGN output refers to a measure of
`
`urinary PAGN output for a subject receiving ongoing stable daily dosages of the nitrogen
`
`scavenging drug.
`
`[0014] Urinary PAGN can be measured in various ways; in some embodiments, as described
`
`herein, it is a 24-hour measurement, which means measurement of total urinary PAGN output for a
`
`period of 24 hours following the first dose of the day of a nitrogen scavenging drug. In other
`
`embodiments, a 12-24 hour urinary PAGN level is used, which is the total amount of urinary
`
`PAGN excreted over the time period 12—24 hours after the first dose of the day. As an alternative,
`
`as described herein, spot testing of urinary PAGN levels can be used, by normalizing the value as a
`
`ratio to urinary creatinine output. Daily creatinine output is relatively stable for most subjects, and
`
`this has been found to be true even in the UCD, IIE, and CRF patients receiving the nitrogen
`
`scavenging drugs described herein. Because creatinine output is relatively stable, it can be used to
`
`normalize urinary PAGN output levels: from a ‘spot test’ of a partial sample, the ratio of uPAGN
`
`to urinary creatinine can be used to estimate a total daily urinary PAGN output. These values may
`
`be used in calculations of dosages or protein intake based on urinary PAGN output as well as for
`
`determining initial drug dosage for a patient taking a given amount of protein.
`
`[0015] The invention further provides methods to easily monitor treated patients to determine
`
`from urinary PAGN output whether their overall treatment program (diet and medication) is
`
`working, and when the patient needs a modified treatment program or adjusted drug dosage. These
`
`methods comprise monitoring urinary PAGN output, either as a 24 hour output, or as a 12-24 hour
`
`total urinary PAGN output, or as an estimated value from a spot test, where the urinary output is
`
`normalized to urinary creatinine and converted to an estimated 24—hour (or 12—24 hour) output. In
`
`one embodiment, the method comprises comparing that value for urinary PAGN to a cut—off value
`
`that distinguishes patients likely to have normal ammonia levels from patients likely to have high
`
`ammonia levels.
`
`[0016] Prodrugs of phenylbutyrate (PBA, the active ingredient in BUPHENYL®(sodium
`
`phenylbutyrate), which is the sodium salt of PBA along with small amounts of inert ingredients),
`
`which is itself a prodrug of phenylacetic acid (PAA), are especially subject to the effects described
`
`herein.
`
`Page 8 of 99
`
`Page 8 of 99
`
`

`

`WO 2010/025303
`
`PCT/US2009/055256
`
`“\
`
`“~/\coz’Na*
`
`phenylbutyrate
`
`I \
`/
`
`OH
`
`Phenylacetic acid
`
`0
`
`NH2
`
`HO
`
`..,,N
`H
`
`o
`
`LG
`
`Phenylacetylglutamine
`
`[0017] As used herein “ammonia scavenging drugs” is defined to include all orally
`
`administered drugs in the class which contain or are metabolized to phenylacetate. Thus, the term
`
`includes at least phenylbutyrate, BUPHENYL® (sodium phenylbutyrate), AMMONAPS®,
`
`butyroyloxymethyl-4-phenylbutyrate, glyceryl tri-[4-phenylbutyrate] (HPN-lOO), esters, ethers,
`
`and acceptable salts, acids and derivatives thereof. These drugs reduce high levels of endogenous
`
`ammonia by providing phenylacetic acid in vivo, which is metabolized efficiently to form
`
`phenylacetyl glutamine (PAGN). PAGN is efficiently excreted in urine, carrying away two
`
`equivalents of nitrogen per mole of PAA converted to PAGN. References herein to sodium
`
`phenylbutyrate are understood to include reference to the drug product BUPHENYL®, and
`
`BUPHENYL® was used for the Examples herein wherever test subjects were treated with sodium
`
`phenylbutyrate. Thus the sodium PBA dosages used in the Examples generally refer to a dosage of
`
`BUPHENYL®, and the amounts of sodium phenylbutyrate in those Examples should be interpreted
`
`accordingly. Note that the terms ‘ammonia scavenger’ and ‘nitrogen scavenger’ are used
`
`interchangeably in this invention, reflecting the fact that the drugs described herein lower blood
`
`ammonia and/or urea levels through elimination of waste nitrogen in the form of PAGN.
`
`[0018]
`
`In some embodiments, the invention uses prodrugs that can be converted into PAA
`
`within the body. Sodium phenylbutyrate (sodium PBA) is one such drug; it is converted by
`
`oxidative mechanisms into PAA in the body. HPN- 100 is another such drug:
`
`it can be hydrolyzed
`
`to release PBA, which in turn can be converted to PAA. Thus, HPN-l 00 is a prodrug of PBA, and
`
`also a pre—prodrug of PAA. Clinical evidence demonstrates that HPN-lOO is converted into PAA
`
`7
`
`Page 9 of 99
`
`Page 9 of 99
`
`

`

`WO 2010/025303
`
`PCT/US2009/055256
`
`in the body as expected, and that PAA is then linked to a molecule of glutamine and converted into
`
`PAGN, which is eliminated in the urine as predicted. This process can be summarized as follows:
`
`HPN—lOO 9 3 PBA 9 3 PAA
`
`PAA + glutamine 9 PAGN.
`
`[0019] PAGN is mainly excreted in the subject’s urine, and removes two molecules of
`
`ammonia per molecule of cxcrctcd PAGN. Each HPN -100 molcculc forms thrcc PAA molcculcs,
`
`so each molecule of HPN—100 can promote excretion of six molecules of ammonia. The clinical
`
`results suggest that conversion of HPN- 100 into PBA and FAA is efficient, in that HPN-100 is
`
`generally not detectable in blood, but surprisingly suggest that some PBA derived from HPN-lOO
`
`is converted to PAGN before the HPN—lOO (or PBA, or PAA derived from PBA) enters systemic
`
`circulation. As a result, systemic levels of PAA or PBA are not reliably correlated with the
`
`efficacy of HPN-lOO as an ammonia scavenger.
`
`[0020]
`
`In some embodiments, the invention uses a prodrug of PBA, including IIPN-100 and
`
`other esters of phenylbutyrate. The PBA prodrug is thus a prodrug of a prodrug, since PBA acts to
`
`scavenge ammonia after it is converted to FAA and is thus considered a prodrug of PAA. In some
`
`embodiments, the PBA prodrug is an ester of phenylbutyrate, such as those described below; a
`
`preferred PBA prodrug for use in the invention is HPN-IOO. These compounds can be made and
`
`used by methods disclosed in US. Patent No. 5,968,979, which is incorporated herein by reference
`
`for its description of these compounds and methods for their administration.
`
`[002]] Where an ‘equal molar’ or ‘equimolar’ amount of a second drug is to be used along
`
`with or instead of a certain amount of a first drug, the amount of each drug is calculated on a molar
`
`basis, and the equimolar amount of the second drug is the amount that produces an equal molar
`
`amount of active drug in viva. Where one of the drugs is a prodrug, the amount of prodrug will
`
`typically refer to the molar amount of the active species formed from that prodrug. That active
`
`species is usually PAA for the prodrugs described herein, and the molar amount of a prodrug
`
`corresponds to the amount of PAA that would form in the body from that amount of the prodrug,
`
`assuming complete conversion into PAA occurs in vivo. Thus, for example, a molecule of HPN-
`
`100 can be metabolized by ester hydrolysis followed by oxidation to form three molecules of PAA,
`
`so a mole of HPN-100 would be considered equimolar to three moles of PAA. Similarly, since
`
`HPN-100 hydrolyzes to form three molecules of PBA (and one molecule of glycerol), an
`
`equimolar amount of HPN-lOO would be one-third of the molar amount of PBA.
`
`Page 10 0f 99
`
`Page 10 of 99
`
`

`

`WO 2010/025303
`
`PCT/US2009/055256
`
`[0022] The following Table sets forth amounts of HPN—lOO that correspond to equimolar
`
`amounts of certain relevant doses of BUPHENYL® (sodium phenylbutyrate). Note that the
`
`conversion of the dose of sodium PBA to the dose of HPN- 100 involves correction for their
`
`different chemical forms [i.e. HPN—IOO consists of glycerol in ester linkage with 3 molecules of
`
`PBA and contains no sodium; (sodium PBA [g] X 0.95 = HPN—100 [g])] as well as correction for
`
`the specific gravity of HPN—lOO, which is 1.1 g/mL.
`
`Table 1. Conversion Factors.
`
`HPN-100
`HPN-100
`BUPHENYL®
`
`(sodium PBA)
`PBA Equivalent Dose (mg)
`PBA Equivalent Dose (mL)
`
`17.4 mL
`
`450—600 mg/kg/day
`(patients 3 20 kg)
`
`9.9-13.0 g/1112/day
`(patients > 20 kg)
`Maximum Daily Dose: 20 g
`
`428 — 570 mg/kg/day
`
`9.4 — 12.4 g/m2/day
`Maximum Daily Dose: 19 g
`
`0.39—0.52 mL/kg/day
`
`8.6-1 1.2 mI./mZ/day
`
`[0023] The present invention can use prodrugs of the formula (I):
`
`H
`
`H
`
`H
`
`H
`
`H
`
`o— R1
`
`o— R2
`
`o— R3
`
`(1)
`
`wherein R1, R2, and R3 are independently, II,
`
`313
`
`(042)”
`
`-
`
`€14
`
`(CmHzm-z)
`
`and n is zero or an even number, m is an even number and at least one of R1, R2, and R3
`
`is not H. For each R1, R2, or R3, n or m is independently selected, so the R1, R2, and R3 groups
`
`in a compound of formula I do not have to be identical. The preferred compounds are those
`
`wherein none of R1, R2, and R3 is H, and frequently each n or 111 for a particular embodiment is
`
`the same, i.e., R1, R2, and R3 are all the same. The advantage over the prior art of decreased
`
`Page 11 of 99
`
`Page 11 of 99
`
`

`

`WO 2010/025303
`
`PCT/US2009/055256
`
`dosage is greater with such triesters, and having all three acyl groups the same reduces issues
`
`related to mixtures of isomers. Moreover, the triol backbone liberated by hydrolysis of the
`
`esters is glycerol, a normal constituent of dietary triglyceride which is non-toxic.
`
`[0024] The present invention also utilizes phenylbutyrate and phenylacetate prodrugs of the
`
`formula II:
`
`R—Oi
`
`R4
`
`(H)
`
`wherein R is a C1—Cm alkyl group,
`
`R4 lS
`
`Hui
`
`(CH2)n
`
`or
`
`\
`
`A“) H
`
`rn 2m-2
`
`)
`
`and n is zero or an even number, and m is an even number.
`
`[0025]
`
`In Formula II, R can be, for example, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, n—butyl, and the like.
`
`[0026] The compounds of the invention are esters of the congeners of phenylalkanoic and
`
`phenylalkenoic acids having an even number of carbon atoms in the alkanoic acid portion, which
`
`include phcnylacctic acid esters and those of phcnylbutyric acid, etc, which can be converted by
`
`efficient beta—oxidation processes to phenylacetic acid in the body. They are thus prodrugs for
`
`phenylacetic acid. Where n is 2 or 4, the esters are also prodrugs for phcnylbutyric acid.
`
`Preferably the alkylene or alkenylene carboxylate group contains 24 or fewer carbon atoms, so 11 or
`
`m is less than 24. In some embodiments, n and m are 0, 2, 4 or 6, and in some preferred
`
`embodiments n or m is 2.
`
`[0027] Certain preferred embodiments of the invention use HPN-lOO (Formula III):
`
`10
`
`Page 12 0f 99
`
`Page 12 of 99
`
`

`

`WO 2010/025303
`
`PCT/US2009/055256
`
`O
`
`O
`
`O
`
`O
`
`O
`
`H
`
`H
`
`H
`
`H
`
`H
`
`(111)
`
`[0028] Total daily dosage of prodrugs like sodium PBA can often be selected according to the
`
`amount needed to provide an appropriate amount of the active species, if that amount is known or
`
`can be determined. PBA is a prodrug for PAA; therefore, an initial dose of PBA could be selected
`
`if an effective dosage of PAA were known, taking into account the fraction of PBA that is
`
`converted into FAA and ultimately into PAGN. If a subject has been treated with PAA or a
`
`prodrug that forms PAA in the body, the amount of the previously used drug that was effective
`
`provides a possible starting point for selecting a dosage of a new prodru g of PAA. In this same
`
`patient, after the new prodrug is administered at the expected PAA dose equivalence, the PAA
`
`levels in the subject could be monitored and the dose of the prodrug adjusted until the same plasma
`
`level of PAA that was effective with the previous treatment is achieved. However, the current
`
`invention is based in part on finding that plasma FAA and PBA levels are not well correlated with
`
`the dose of a PBA prodrug administered or with ammonia elimination; for monitoring a dosing
`
`level of a PBA prodrug, one should not rely upon these parameters to assess the effectiveness of
`
`the prodrug. While not bound by the underlying theory, explanations for this effect (i.e. the
`
`inconsistent relationship between ammonia scavenging and PBA and/or PAA blood levels) are
`
`provided herein.
`
`[0029] The following Tables provides data from three clinical test groups showing the
`
`inconsistent relationship between plasma FAA and PBA levels among healthy volunteers, patients
`
`with cirrhosis and UCD patients, despite that fact that, as described in detail below, all groups
`
`exhibited similar ammonia scavenging activity based on urinary excretion of PAGN. Note in Table
`
`11
`
`Page 13 0f 99
`
`Page 13 of 99
`
`

`

`WO 2010/025303
`
`PCT/US2009/055256
`
`2, for example, that plasma FAA and PBA, measured as AUC24 were both about 4-fold lower
`
`following single dose administration of HPN—lOO as compared with sodium PBA to healthy
`
`volunteers (see also Figure 4), despite similar ammonia scavenging as determined by urinary
`
`output of PAGN. Similarly, healthy volunteers and cirrhotic subjects exhibited no differences in
`
`urinary PAGN output, yet PAA blood levels tended to be higher in Child—Pugh C cirrhotics.
`
`12
`
`Page 14 0f 99
`
`Page 14 of 99
`
`

`

`WO 2010/025303
`
`PCT/US2009/055256
`
`Table 2. Plasma Pharmacokinetics of PBA, FAA, and PAGN Comparison across Studies
`
`AU C24
`Tl/Z
`Tmax
`Cmax
`(ug-h/mL)
`(h)
`(h)
`(Mg/mL)
`Treatment
`Analyte
`
`Healthy Volunteers (Single Dose — 3 g/mzlday PBA Mole Equivalent)
`0.7
`Sodium PBA
`0.9
`
`HPN-100
`37.0
`2.4
`1.9
`137.2
`
`
`HPN-100
`14.9
`4.0
`NC
`70.9
`
`HPN-100
`
`4.0
`
`NC
`
`Healthy Volunteers and Cirrhotic Patients (Multiple day dosing of HPN-100 at 100 mg/kg BID) 1
`
`
`
`Child-Pugh A
`
`Child-Pugh B
`
`Child-Pugh C
`Volunteers
`
`UCD Subjects (Multiple Dose — PBA Mole Equivalent)
`
`——m——
`
`——m——
`Cum: maximum plasma concentration; Tmax = time of maximum plasma concentration; AUC24 = AUC from time 0 to
`24 hours; NC = not calculated
`1Study did not include a sodium phenylbutyrate comparator arm, values represent IIPN—lOO dosing only. AUC values
`represent the AUC from time 0 to the last measurable plasma concentration.
`
`[0030] The plasma and urinary pharmacokinetic parameters for 10 UCD patients are
`
`summarized at the bottom of Table 2 and in more detail in the following Table 3. Note that urinary
`
`PAGN output was very similar for sodium PBA (as BUPHENYL) and HPN—lOO in UCD patients
`
`at steady state following multiple day dosing. However, in this case, plasma PBA levels measured
`
`as AUC24 following HPN—lOO were about 27% lower following HPN—lOO administration, as
`
`compared with sodium PBA administration, whereas PAA blood levels were similar for subjects
`
`13
`
`Page 15 of 99
`
`Page 15 of 99
`
`

`

`WO 2010/025303
`
`PCT/US2009/055256
`
`on both drugs. Notably, peak urinary output of PAGN occurred during hours 6-12 after the first
`
`dose of PBA, but during hours 12-24 following HPN-100 dosing, again demonstrating the slow—
`
`release characteristics of HPN-100. Collectively, these

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket