throbber
Subclass
`
` |
`
`SSUECLASSIFICATION
`
`PATENT DATE
`UTILITY
`SERIAL
`
`NUMBER
`
`‘SERIAL NUMBER.
`
`5711849
`ua
`||
`
`
`
`AN 27 1998
`
`mam
`
`Ate tm)
`
`
`
`
`et
`
`Foreign priority claimed
`O yes {dno
`35 USC 119 conditions met O
`no
`
` Verified and Acknowledged
`
`EMoar J20 Center, BAF,
`“2Cf
`
`2OF4
`
`
`
`
`U.S. DEPT. OF COMM.) PAT. & TM—PTO-436L_(Rev.12
`
`
`
`—
`_ eer!
`
`Assistant Examiner
`/
`
`
`Syd
`AAi SAY
`LE f Mw vy
`
`
`/
`. .
`Sheets Drwg.
`<7SS) 2a7
` “MARTIVANGEBRANNOT
`
`
`ISSUE
`BATCH
`& Primary Examiner|NUMBER AAS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Rev. 8/92)
`;
`on .
`—nne
`‘ERSEA reeey
`
`
`Page | of 210
`
`PRIMARY EXAMINER
`ROUP 1100
`
`WARNING:
`
`Theinformation disclosed herein may berestricted. Unauthorized disclosure may be prohibited ff
`by the United States Code Title 35, Sections 122, 181 and 368. Possession outside the U.S.
`FRRIM
`Patent & Trademark Office is restricted to authorized employees and contractors only.
`
`Form PTO-436A
`
`4
`
`:
`
`be
`
`is ent
`
`
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1002
`
`PARTS OF APPLICATION
` 4 AMpadgpont »
`
`FILED SEPARATELY
`
`NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED
`
`‘
`
`_—
`
`Ap lication Examiner—’
`
`Page 1 of 210
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1002
`
`

`

`ia y
`
`i aainani:
`
`a
`ae
`
`.
`
`. PATENT APPLICATION
`APPROVEDFORLICENSETy:
`ATA ape8352S ad
`
`08433623
`bees
`>.
`ae
`ere
`CONTENTS — a1|
`
`4
`
`
`
`Be
`
`1. Appjication _—__________ papers.
`
`2. (Te LE PEE, S/W ATURE
`
`(FRONT)
`
`Page 2 of 210
`
`Page 2 of 210
`
`

`

`Staple Issue Slip Here
`
`POSITION
`ID NO.
`oussren[TO
`—eeannes—[
`
`INDEX OF CLAIMS
`
`SYMBOLS
`
`S o
`
`r-=t
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`J
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`L En |__|
`
`if
`
`4
`
`]
`
`Page 3 of 210
`
`(LEFT INSIDE)
`
`Page 3 of 210
`
`

`

`
`nee i
`ORIGINAL CLA’
`IFICATION
`
`
`
`CROSSREFERENCED)
`:
`
`
`
`
`er
`
`2
`
`-
`
`class
`
`CLL)
`
`° Tv lawam ev aL,
`
`
`
`
`ee GROUP
`SEERTANT EXAMINER (PLEASE STAMP OR PRINT FULL NAME)
`ART UNIT
`
`Vit ?
`PRIMARY EXAMINER (PLEASE STAMP OR PRINT FULL NAME)
`LEM U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`ty
`_A Wwe
`ISSUE CLASSIFICATION SLIP
`(ARVBet)
`PATENT ANO TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_o™
`7
`PATENT NUMBER
`
`Pe yy Ae AS
`be hrs
`
`
`» APPLICATION SERIAL NUMBER
`
`C79 2202)
`*. APPLICANT'S NAME(PLEASEPRINT)
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 210
`
`Page 4 of 210
`
`

`

`sie, tf 666.) (RIGHT OUTSIDE)
`
`INTERFERENCE SEARCHED
`
`Class
`
`Sub.
`
`2o, 1 6 Hhal
`
`Page 5 of 210
`
`Page 5 of 210
`
`

`

`
`
`PATENT APPLICATION SERIAL NO.
`
`a
`
`B<
`
`*
`
`U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`FEE RECORD SHEET
`
`PTO-1556
`(5/87)
`
`Page 6 of 210
`
`Page 6 of 210
`
`

`

`BAR CODE LABEL
`
`SERIAL NUMBER
`
`08/433,623
`
`FILING DATE
`
`05/03/95
`
`GROUP ART UNIT
`
`1109
`
`DANIEL L. PLAMM, WALNUT CREEK, CA;
`*
`
`JOHN P. VERBONCOEUR, HAYWARD, CA.
`
`X*CONTINUING DATARS ARR ARR AHR RR RHR RRR
`VERIFIED ~
`'
`
`**FOREIGN/PCT APPLICATIONS**####kkHH RH
`VERIFIED
`
`FOREIGN FILING LICENSE GRANTED 08/08/95
`INDEPENDENT
`CLAIMS
`
`*keee SMALL ENTITY *****
`FILING FEE
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`RECEIVED
`
`$501.00
`
`16655-000100
`
`ADDRESS
`
`RICHARD T OGAWA
`TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND KHOURIE AND CREW
`STEUART STREET TOWER
`ONE MARKET PLAZA 20TH FLOOR
`SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
`
`PROCESS OPTIMIZATION IN GAS PHASE DRY ETCHING
`
`WL U.S. PATENTAPPLICATION
`
`COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS Date
`
`This is to certify
`
`that annexed heretois a true copy from the records of the United States
`
`Patent and Trademark Office of the application whichis identified above.
`By authority of the
`
`Certifying Officer.
`
`Page 7 of 210
`
`Page 7 of 210
`
`

`

`.
`Sir:
`Transmitted herewith for filing is the
`[x] patent application of
`[ ] design patent application of
`[ ] continuation-in-part patent
`
`|Boer:[DANIEL u{euan
`
`appligation of
`
`VERBONCOEUR
`
`I hereby certify that this is being deposited with the
`United States Postal Service "Express Mail Post Office
`to Addressee" service under 37 CFR 1.10 on the date
`indicated above and is addressed to the Commissioner
`
`
`
`Date of Deposit___MAY3,1995.
`
` Cn
`"Express Mail" Label No.
`_7B175028216US
`*
`
`COMMISSIONER OF PATENT AND TRADEMARKS
`Washington, D. C. 20231
`
`For: PROCESS OPTIMIZATION IN GAS PHASE DRY ETCHING
`
`Enclosed are:
`
`[x] informal drawing(s).
`
`sheet(s) of [ ] formal
`13___
`[x]
`{] An assignment ofthe invention to
`(x] A[] signed [x] unsigned Declaration & Power of Attorney.
`{] AE[] signed [] unsigned Declaration.
`[] A Power ofAttorney.
`[] A verified statement to establish small entity status under 37 CFR 1.9 and 37 CFR 1.27.
`[] A certified copy ofa
`:
`application.
`[]
`Information Disclosure Statement under 37 CFR 1.97.
`[]
`
`In view of the Unsigned Declaration as filed with this application and pursuant to 37 CFR §1.53(d),
`Applicant requests deferral of the filing fee until submission of the Missing Parts of Application.
`
`DO NOT CHARGETHE FILING FEE AT THIS TIME.
`
`Telephone:
`(415) 543-9600
`APPNOFEE.TRN 12/92
`
`.
`
`
` T. Ogawa
`
`i
`Reg. No.: 37,692
`Attorneys for Applicant
`
`Page 8 of 210
`
`Page 8 of 210
`
`

`

`
` PATENT APPLICATION
`
`Attorney Docket No. 016655~-0001
`
`Inventors:
`
`Daniel L. Flamm, a U.S. citizen,
`residing at
`476 Green View Drive
`Walnut Creek, California
`
`94596; and
`
`John Verboncoeur, a U.S.
`citizen, residing at
`3350 Oakes Drive
`Hayward, California
`
`94542.
`
`Assignee:
`
`Jonathan International
`476 Green View Drive
`Walnut Creek, CA
`94596
`
`Entity:
`
`Small
`
`TOWNSEND and TOWNSEND KHOURIE and CREW
`Steuart Street Tower, 20th Floor
`One Market Plaza
`San Francisco, California 94105
`(415) 326-2400
`
`Page 9 of 210
`
`Page 9 of 210
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`1 4,VOTVerve
`PATENT
`Attorney Docket No. 016655-0001
`PROCESS OPTIMIZATION IN GAS PHASE DRY ETCHING
`
`5
`
`:
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`The present invention relates to integrated circujts
`and their manufacture.
`The present invention is illustrated
`in an example with regard to plasma etching, and more
`particularly to plasma etching in resist strippers in
`semiconductor processing. But it will be recognized that the
`invention has a wider range of applicability in other
`technologies such as flat panel displays,
`large area substrate
`processing, and the like. Merely by way of example,
`the
`invention may be applied in plasma etching of materials such
`as silicon, silicon dioxide, silicon nitride, polysilicon,
`photoresist, polyimide,
`tungsten, among others.
`Industry utilizes or has proposed several techniques
`for plasma etching. One such method is conventional chemical
`gas phase dry etching. Conventional chemical gas phase dry
`etching relies upon a reaction between a neutral gas phase
`species and a surface material layer, typically for removal.
`. The reaction generally forms volatile products with the
`surface material layer for its removal.
`In such method,
`
`the
`
`neutral gas phase species may be formed by way of a plasma
`discharge.
`
`A limitation with the conventional plasma etching
`technique is obtaining and maintaining etching uniformity
`within selected predetermined limits.
`In fact,
`the
`conventional technique for obtaining and maintaining uniform
`etching relies upon a "trial and error" process.
`The trial
`and error process often cannot anticipate the effects of
`parameter changes for actual wafer production. Accordingly,
`the conventional technique for.obtaining and maintaining
`etching uniformity is often costly,
`laborious, and difficult
`to achieve.
`
`Another limitation with the conventional plasma
`etching technique is reaction rates between the etching
`species and the etched material are often not available.
`Accordingly, it is often impossible to anticipate actual etch
`
`J
`
`Page 10 of 210
`
`Page 10 of 210
`
`

`

` 2
`
`rates from reaction rate constants since no accurate reaction
`
`In fact, conventional
`rate constants are available.
`techniques require the actual construction and operation of an
`etching apparatus to obtain accurate etch rates. Full scale
`prototype equipment and the use of actual semiconductor wafers
`are often required,
`thereby being an expensive and time
`consuming process.
`From the above it is seen that a method and
`
`apparatus of etching semiconductor wafers that is easy,
`reliable, faster, predictable, and cost effective is often
`desired.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`According to the present invention, a plasma etching
`method that includes determining a reaction rate coefficient
`based upon etch profile data is provided.
`The present plasma
`etching method provides for an easy and cost effective way to
`select appropriate etching parameters such as reactor
`dimensions,
`temperature, pressure, radio frequency (rf) power,
`flow rate and the like by way of the etch profile data.
`In a specific embodiment, the present invention
`provides an integrated circuit fabrication method.
`The
`present method includes steps of providing a plasma etching
`apparatus having a substrate therein. The substrate includes
`a top surface and a film overlying the top surface.
`The film
`includes a top film surface.
`The present method also includes
`chemically etching the top film surface to define an etching
`profile on the film, and defining etch rate data which
`includes an etch rate and a spatial coordinate from the
`etching profile.
`A step of extracting a reaction rate
`constant from the etch rate data, and using the reaction rate
`constant in adjusting a plasma etching apparatus is also
`included.
`
`the present
`In an alternative specific embodiment,
`invention also provides a method of designing a reactor.
`The
`present method includes providing a first plasma etching
`apparatus having a substrate therein. The substrate has a top
`surface and a film overlying the top surface.
`The film has a
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`Page 11 of 210
`
`Page 11 of 210
`
`

`

`3
`
`The present method also includes chemically
`top film surface.
`etching.the top film surface to define an etching profile on
`the film, and defining etch rate data which has an etch rate
`and a spatial coordinate from the etching profile.
`A step of
`extracting a reaction rate constant from the etch rate data,
`and using the reaction rate constant in designing a second
`plasma etching apparatus is also included.
`A further alternative embodiment provides another
`method of fabricating an integrated circuit device. The
`present method includes steps of providing a uniformity value
`for an etching reaction. The etching reaction includes a
`substrate and etchant species.
`The present method also
`includes defining etching parameterfg ranges providing the
`uniformity value.
`A step of adjusting at least one of the
`etching parameters to produce a selected etching rate is also
`included.
`The etching rate provides an etching condition for
`fabrication of an integrated circuit device.
`The present invention achieves these benefits in the
`context of known process technology. However, a further
`understanding of the nature and advantages of the present
`invention may be realized by reference to the latter portions
`‘of the specification and attached drawings.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`Fig. we a simplified diagram of a plasma etching
`apparatus accordingto the present invention;
`Fig. 1A‘’is a simplified cross-sectional view of a
`wafer profile according,gf the plasma etching apparatus of
`Fig. 1;
`Fig.
`> ks a simplified diagram of an alternative
`
`embodiment of a plasma etching apparatus according to the
`present invention;
`
`Figs. Alco simplified flow diagrams of plasma
`Fig. sx a plot of uniformity,
`temperature,
`
`etching methods acgording to the present invention;
`
`pressure, and gap for an etching process according to the
`present invention;
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`Page 12 of 210
`
`Page 12 of 210
`
`

`

`4
`
`Fig. 6 is a simplified plot of 1/ash rate vs. LCD
`plate number according to the present invention;
`
`Figs. (2stusteate an example with regard to
`circular substrates according to the present invention; and
`Figs. 104 illustrate an example with regard to
`rectangular substrates according to the present invention.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIFIC EMBODIMENT
`U:
`
`. - Fig. 1 is a simplified diagram of a plasma etching
`apparatus 10 according to the present invention.
`The plasma
`etching apparatus also known as a co-axial reactor includes at
`least three processing zones.
`The three processing zones are
`defined as a plasma generating zone (PG) 13, a transport zone
`(TZ) 15, a plate stack zone (PS) 17, and others. Also shown
`are a chemical feed F and exhaust E.
`The plasma generating
`zone provides for reactant species in plasma form and others.
`Excitation is often derived from a 13.56 MHz rf discharge 8
`and may use either capacitor plates or a wrapped coil, but can
`also be derived from othersou ces. The co-axial reactor 10
`eontre ier
`-also includes a chemical,ftowsource 14 and a temperature and
`pressure control 12, among other features.
`Chemical effects are often enhanced over ion induced
`
`effects and other effects by way of perforated metal shields
`18 to confine the discharge to a region between an outer wall
`16 and shields 18.
`The co-axial reactor relies substantially
`upon diffusion to obtain the desired etching uniformity.
`The
`co-axial reactor,also relies upon a chemical etch rate which
`is diffusion ,t7
`.
`In particular,
`the chemical etch rate
`is generally defined as a chemical reaction rate of etchant
`species plus at least a diffusion rate of etchant species.
`When the diffusion rate of etchant species is much greater
`than the chemical reaction rate,
`the chemical etch rate is
`often determined by the diffusion rate.
`A more detailed
`analysis of such chemical etch rate will be described by way
`of the subsequent embodiments.
`Etchant species from the plasma generating zone
`diffuse through the transport zone 15 of the reaction chamber,
`
`|
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`35
`
`Page 13 of 210
`
`Page 13 of 210
`
`

`

`5
`
`5
`
`and enter the plate stack zone space over surfaces of
`substrates 21.
`A concentration of etchant in the transport
`zone, which is often annular, between the plasma generating
`zone and the plate stack zone is defined as njy. As etchant
`diffuses radially from the transport zone into the plate stack
`zone and over surfaces of the substrates, it is consumed by ‘an
`etching reaction.
`A reactant concentration above the
`substrate can be defined as n,(r,z), where r is the distance
`from the center of the substrate and z is the distance above
`
`10
`
`ria!
`
`|
`
`A diffusive velocity v, of etchant species in
`the substrate.
`_the plate stack zone is characterized by Fick's law.
`
`Vn
`v,=-D—
`ny
`
`In a specific embodiment, a gap dgap above the
`substrate is much less than the lateral extent d,,,<<r and gas
`phase mass transfer resistance across the small axial distance
`is negligible so that the axial (z-direction) term of the
`concentration gradient can be ignored.
`The embodiment can be
`applied without this restriction; however, numerical mesh
`. computer solutions are then required to evaluate the reaction
`rate constant and uniformity.
`In the embodiment,
`the surface
`etching reaction bears a first order form:
`
`15
`
`20
`
`O+S ~ SO
`
`where
`
`S is a substrate atom (e.g., resist unit "mer"); and
`O is the gas-phase etchant (for example oxygen
`atoms) with certain etching kinetics.
`The first order etching
`25____reaction can be defined as follows:
`Aioi¥
`Ryg=nAyTe BacBF
`
`where
`
`Ro, defines a reaction rate;
`n, defines a concentration;
`A defines a reaction rate constant;
`
`30
`
`T defines a temperature;
`
`Page 14 of 210
`
`Page 14 of 210
`
`

`

`6
`
`E,cr defines an activation energy; and
`R defines a gas constant.
`An example of the first reaction is described in D.L. Flamm
`and D.M. Manos "Plasma Etching," (1989), which is hereby
`incorporated by reference for all purposes. Of course, other
`order reactions, reaction relations, and models may be applied
`depending upon the particular application.
`An example of an etched substrate 21 from the plate
`stack zone is illustrated by Fig. 1A. The substrate 21 is
`defined in spatial coordinates such as z and r.
`The substrate
`includes a bottom surface 23, sides 25, and a top surface film
`27. As can be seen, the top surface film includes a convex
`region, or etching profile.
`The etching profile occurs by way
`of different etch rates along the r-direction of the substrate
`corresponding to different etchant species concentrations.
`A
`concentration profile n,(r,z) is also shown where the greatest
`concentration of reactant species exists at the outer
`periphery of the top surface film.
`In the present invention,
`an etch rate constant may be obtained by correlation to the
`etching profile.
`By way of the etch rate constant, other
`etching parameters such as certain reactor dimensions
`including a distance between substrates, pressure,
`“temperature, and the like are easily calculated.
`Fig. 2 illustrates an alternative example of an
`The
`etching apparatus 50 according to the present invention.
`etching apparatus 50 is a single wafer etching apparatus with
`elements such as a chamber 53, a top electrode 55, a bottom
`
`The
`
`electrode 57, a power source 59, a platen 64, and others.
`bottom electrode 57 is at a ground potential, and the top
`electrode is operably coupled to the power source 59 at a high
`voltage potential.
`A plasma exists in a region 54 between the
`top electrode 55 and the bottom electrode 57, which is often a
`grid configuration or the like. Reactant species are directed
`via power source from a plasma source to a wafer substrate 61
`by diffusion.
`A temperature and pressure controller 67 and a
`flow controller 69 are also shown.
`The etching apparatus also
`includes a chemical source feed F and a exhaust E. Of course,
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`Page 15 of 210
`
`Page 15 of 210
`
`

`

`
`
`7
`
`other elements may also be available based upon the particular
`application.
`By way of a plate 63 interposed between the wafer
`substrate 61 and the bottom electrode 57,
`the reactant species
`do not directly bombard the wafer substrate.
`The plate is |
`preferably made of an inert material appropriate for the
`particular etching such as pyrex or glass for resist ashing,
`alumina for fluorine atom etching of silicon, silicon nitride,
`or silicon dioxide, and the like.
`In an ashing reaction,
`the
`plate is placed at a distance ranging from about 5 mm to 50 mm
`and less from the wafer substrate 61. Of course, other
`dimensions may be used depending upon the particular
`application.
`The reactant species are transported via
`diffusion from the plasma source to the wafer substrate around
`the periphery of the plate ‘63. Accordingly,
`the reaction rate
`at the wafer substrate is controlled by a balance between
`chemical reaction and diffusion effects, rather than
`directional bombardment.
`
`By way of the diffusion effects, an etching rate
`constant may be obtained for the etching apparatus 50 of Fig.
`_2.
`In particular,
`the etching rate constant derives from a
`etching profile 65, which can be measured by conventional
`techniques.
`The present invention uses the etching rate
`constant to select other etching rate parameters such as
`reactor dimensions) such<ae spacing between the substrate and
`its adjacent surface,
`temperatures, pressures, and the like.
`But the present invention can be used with other reactor types
`where etching may not be controlled by diffusion.
`For
`example,
`the present invention provides a reaction rate which
`can be used in the design of reactors where diffusion does not
`control such as a directional etcher and the like.
`The
`
`reaction rate constant may also be used in the directional
`etcher to predict an extent of, for example, undercutting of
`unprotected sidewalls while ion bombardment drives reaction in
`a vertical direction. Of course,
`the invention may be applied
`to other reactors such as large batch, high pressure,
`chemical, single wafer, and others. The invention can also be
`applied to different substrate materials, and the like.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`& 25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`Page 16 of 210
`
`Page 16 of 210
`
`

`

`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`PlasmaEtchingMethod
`
`' Figs. 3-5 illustrate simplified flow diagrams of
`plasma etching methods according to the present invention.
`The
`present methods provide for improved etching conditions by
`way, a reaction rate constant derived from, for example, an .
`etching profile.
`It should be noted that the present methods
`as illustrated should not be construed as limiting the
`ill in
`invention as defined in the claims. One of ordinary
`the art would easily recognize other applications to, he
`inventions described here.
`In a specific embodiment, a method of extracting a
`rate constant 100 for a plasma etching step according to the
`present invention is illustrated by the flow diagram of Fig.
`3.
`A substrate with an overlying film is placed into a plasma
`etching apparatus or the like.
`The overlying film is defined
`as an etching film.
`In the present embodiment,
`the overlying
`film is a photoresist film, but can also be other films such
`as a silicon film, a polysilicon film, silicon nitride,
`silicon oxide, polyimide, and the like.
`A step of plasma etching the film is performed by
`The plasma etching step occurs at constant pressure
`" step 101.
`and preferably constant plasma source characteristics.~@ More
`preferably,
`the plasma etching step occurs isothermally at
`temperature T,, but can also be performed with changing
`temperatures where temperature and time histories can be
`monitored.
`Plasma etching of the film stops before the
`endpoint (or etch stop). Alternatively, plasma etching stops
`at a first sign of the endpoint (or etch stop).
`The plasma
`etching step preferably stops before etching intoan etch stop
`layer underlying the film to define a "clean": etching profile.
`The substrate including etched film is removed from
`the chamber of the plasma etching apparatus.
`The etched film
`includes an etching profile (step 103) made by way of plasma
`etching (step 101).
`The etching profile converts into a
`relative etch rate, relative concentration ratio, a relative
`etch depth, and the like at selected spatial coordinates.
`The
`relative etch rate is defined as an etch rate at a selected
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`spatial coordinate over an etch rate at the substrate edge.
`
`Page 17 of 210
`
`Page 17 of 210
`
`

`

`9
`
`The relative concentration ratio is defined as a concentration
`
`of etchant species at a selected spatial coordinate over a
`concentration of etchant at the substrate edge.
`In x-y-z coordinates,
`the relative etch rate in the
`z-direction, and the spatial coordinates are defined in the x-
`y coordinates.
`The etching profile is thereby characterized
`as a relative etch rate u, a x-location, and a y-location“tn.
`(x, y).
`In cylindrical coordinates,
`the relative etch rate i$
`also in the z-direction, and the spatial coordinates are
`defined in the r and 6 coordinates.
`The etching profile is
`characterized as a relative etch rate u, a r-location, and a
`@-location (u, r, 8). An array of data points in either the
`x-y coordinates or r-8 coordinates define the etching
`profile.
`The array of data points can be defined as ann x 3
`array, where n represents the number of points sampled and 3
`represents the etch rate and two spatial dimensions. Of
`course,
`the choice of coordinates depends upon the particular
`application.
`in a non-isothermal condition, an
`Optionally,
`average etch rate is measured.
`By approximate integration of
`a time dependent etch rate, suitable starting point
`‘ approximations for an etching rate constant pre-exponential
`and activation energy can be selected. The etch rate is
`integrated over time (and temperature) using measured
`temperature-time data (or history). An etched depth profile
`and the etching rate from the integration can then be compared
`with actual data.
`A rate constant is appropriately readjusted
`and the aforementioned method is repeated as necessary.
`An etch constant (or a reaction rate constant) over
`diffusivity (k,./D) and an etch rate at an edge is calculated
`at step 105. The etch constant over diffusivity correlates
`with data points representing the etch rate profile.
`In x-y
`coordinates,
`the eationship between k,,/D and the relative
`etch rate u(x,y) fs{detinea as follows:
`where
`
`a and b define substrate lengths in, respectively,
`an x-direction and a y-direction.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`Page 18 of 210
`
`Page 18 of 210
`
`

`

`
`
`10
`
`*
`
`-T}} mK
`
`r\o%
`
`coshl/kyo/D+ (inat/b) “a costy
`mm coshl/K,o/D* (mn/b) =
`+
`u(x,y)=>> sin
`coshl/k,,/D+ (mn 2 cosMEX
`A
`2
`2
`cosh/K,_/D* (mn/a) 72
`
`k
`
`+
`
`
`
`—
`
`ee
`
`.
`In cylindrical coordinates, the relationship between
`the etch constant over diffusivity k,,/D and the relative etch
`rate u(r) is defined as follows:
`
`Oa f~
`Vaya
`
`*
`
`u(r) =
`
`k
`I, >"
`—wZ{ D |
`k
`
`I
`
`|
`
`
`
`where
`:
`a
`a is an outer radius (or edge) of the substrate 3
`In step 106, a diffusivity is calculated for the
`particular etchants.
`The binary diffusivity D,, may be
`calculated based upon the well known Chapman-Enskog kinetic
`———.___theory equation:
`“ThA ih
`
`-
`
`5
`
`.
`
`Sur
`vy
`
`:
`
`Dag = 2.2646 X 105
`
`T
`
`1+_—
`1
`Ms
`My
`Gxp2QDasc
`
`10.
`
`where
`
`_
`
`T is a temperature;
`c is a total molar concentration;
`M, and Mp are molecular weights;
`Dap is a binary diffusivity;
`Ogg is a collision diameter; and
`Collision
`.
`Qpap is ay
`integral.
`The Chapman-Enskog kinetic theory equation is described in
`detail in part III of R.B. Bird, W.E. Stewart, and E.N.
`Lightfoot, "Transport Phenomena," Wiley (1960) which is hereby
`incorporated by reference for all purposes. Of course, other
`techniques for calculating a diffusivity may also be used.
`
`&
`
`15
`
`20
`
`Page 19 of 210
`
`Page 19 of 210
`
`

`

`bros (a
`
`11
`
`The equivalent volumetric reaction rate constant k,, is
`——_-_——___derived from the diffusivity as follows.
`—y\).0F
`,
`T\t
`‘
`
`k
`
`the surface
`Once the reaction rate constant k,, is extracted,
`reaction rate constant k, may be isolated from the previous
`equation as follows.
`
`k= (Kye) Ayap
`
`Repeat steps 101-106 at different temperatures Ty,
`ee
`T3..-.T, to calculate additional reaction rate constants k(T>),
`k(T3)...k(T,).
`The steps are repeated at least two times and
`more, and preferably at least three times and more. Each
`temperature is at least 5 °C greater than the previous
`temperature. Of course, the selection of temperatures and
`trial numbers depend upon the particular application.
`Extract an activation energy E,,, for a first order
`reaction from the data k(T,), k(T3)..,.kK(T,) at Tz, T3..-Ty
`collected via step 109 by way of eneei equation:
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`k, (1) =ayT e ™
`
`20
`
`————"—— The activation energy is preferably calculated by a least
`square fit of data collected at step 109 or any other suitable
`statistical technique.
`By way of the same equation,
`the
`present method calculates surface reaction rate constant k, at
`any temperature.
`In step 111, a concentration n, at the substrate
`edge is calculated.
`The concentration n, deduces from the
`following relationship:
`éés
`N=R,/Kyes
`
`&
`
`where
`
`sa 25
`
`R,,is an etch rate.
`
`From the concentration and the surface reaction rate,
`the
`particular etching step can be improved by way of adjusting
`selected etching parameters.
`
`Page 20 of 210
`
`Page 20 of 210
`
`

`

`
`
`12
`
`In an alternative specific embodiment, a method to
`"tune" a plasma source using a loading effect relationship (or
`equation).
`is illustrated by the simplified flow diagram 200 of
`Fig. 4.
`The method includes a step 201 of measuring an etch
`rate against an effective etchable area A,.
`The effective
`etchable area changes by varying the number m of wafers in the
`reactor, varying the size of the wafer, or the like.
`The
`effective area can be changed 209 by altering a gap between a
`wafer and its above surface 211, changing wafer quantity in
`the reactor 213, and varying substrate support member
`dimensions 215.
`The method preferably occurs at constant
`temperature and pressure. However,
`the effective etchable
`area may also be varied by way of changing a temperature
`and/or a pressure.
`The method calculates a uniformity value (step 217)
`from the measured values of etch rate vs. effective area in
`
`10
`
`15
`
`The uniformity is calculated by, for
`
`steps 211, 213, and 215.
`~~example:
`ant
`o
`
`-R
`La-,
`uniformity=100|ee
`ay31
`
`mm
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`where
`
`Ryax is a maximum etch rate;
`Ryry is a minimum etch rate;
`m is a sample number;
`R; is a general etch rate for an ith sample;
`uniformity is a planarity measurement in
`
`/
`percentage.
`In a specific embodiment, a uniformity of about 90% and
`greater or preferably 95% and greater indicates that the
`effective area of the substrate is substantially equal to the
`actual substrate area (step 221) via branch 216. Of course,
`other methods of calculating a uniformity from etch rates and
`effective areas may also be used depending upon the particular
`application. Alternatively, an etching profile is measured
`and the effective area A,-- is calculated (step 219) by way
`of, e.g.,
`the-loading effect relationship.
`
`Page 21 of 210
`
`Page 21 of 210
`
`

`

`13
`
`At least two and more different effective etchable
`
`areas (step 223) are measured, or preferably at least three
`and more different etchable areas are measured.
`
`the flow diagram returns via branch 224 to step
`Alternatively,
`209, and takes another etch rate measurement at a different

`effective area.
`The flow diagram then turns to step 203.
`In step 203, a supply of etchant sT in the reactor
`is calculated. Based upon the different etchable areas a
`slope MAz,¢¢ deduces from the loading effect relationship as
`follows.
`
`1. _ KA,+F, MAgee
`1
`Rm) kn, k,st
`st
`
`noretim is the etching rate at the boundary between the
`
`plate stack zone and transport zone when m substrates are
`present in the reactor.
`The first term includes a
`recombination term proportional to the total effective area A,
`which acts to catalyze loss of etchant on reactor surfaces in
`the reactor plus a convection term F.
`The second term is the
`loading effect relation, where the reciprocal etch rate is
`proportional to the amount of effective etchable substrate
`“area Ajre- times the number of substrates m. When the etching
`across a substrate is uniform, A,rr is the geometrical
`substrate area Aye When etching is nonuniform, on the other
`hand, Ag¢e is a function of k,,/D and geometrical reactor
`dimensions.
`The supply of etchant st may be calculated for a
`different plasma source or plasma source parameters such as
`temperature, pressure, or the like by repetition 207 of steps
`201 and 203.
`By way of the supply of etchant to the reactor,
`other plasma source parameters may be varied to obtain desired
`etching rates and uniformity for the particular reactor.
`Step 205 provides for the modification of chamber
`materials and the like to reduce slope numerator
`(k,, A, + F)
`in selecting the desired etching conditions.
`The chamber
`materials can be modified to reduce, for example,
`the
`recombination rate in the reactor. The recombination rate is
`
`directly related to the effective reactor recombination area
`A,.
`In step 205,
`the recombination rate can be adjusted by
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`——
`
`Page 22 of 210
`
`Page 22 of 210
`
`

`

`14
`
`"
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`
`30
`
`changing A, via changing chamber material, coating chamber
`surfaces with, for example, a product sold under the trademark
`TEFLON™ or KALREZ™ and the like, among others. Alternatively,
`the slope numerator flow term F is reduced when F contributes
`as a substantial loss term. Of course, the particular
`materials used depend upon the application.
`In step 207,
`the method changes plasma source
`parameters such as rf power,
`flow rate, and the like to select
`desired etching conditions. Once one of the aforementioned
`parameters is adjusted,
`the method returns to step 201 via
`branch 208. At step 201, an etch rate vs. effective etchable
`area is measured and the method continues through the steps
`until: desired etching condition are achieved. Of course,
`other sequences of the aforementioned steps for tuning the
`plasma source may also exist depending upon the particular
`application.
`Fig. 5 is a simplified flow diagram for a method of
`selecting a desired uniformity and desired etching parameters
`within selected ranges to provide a desired etch rate for a
`particular etching process. The etching parameters include
`process variables such as reactor dimensions, a pressure, a
`' temperature, and the like for a particular substrate and
`reactants. Other.etching parameters may also be used
`depending upon theparticular application.
`In step 301, select a uniformity for the selected
`substrate and the reactants.
`The selected uniformity becomes
`an upper operating limit for the reaction according to the
`present method.
`The upper operating limit ensures a "worst
`case" uniformity value for an etched substrate according this
`method. Uniformity can be defined by, for example:
`[t-
`
`& uniformi ty=100,—2"="JRi A
`
`4
`20m3 ~*M
`
`be
`
`Ryax-R
`
`yet
`
`er”
`
`where
`
`—
`
`Ryax is a maximum etch rate;
`Ryry is a minimum etch rate;
`m is a sample number;
`
`Page 23 of 210
`
`Page 23 of 210
`
`

`

`15
`
`R; is a general etch rate for an ith sample;
`uniformity is a planarity measurement in
`
`percentage.
`In certain embodiments,
`the selected uniformity ranges from
`
`about 90 % and greater or more preferably 95 % and greater.”
`Of course, other uniformity values may be selected based upon
`the particular application.
`Based upon the selected uniformity, use the selected
`uniformity as a stating point to extract a plurality of
`teaction rate constants k,.
`The reaction rate constants may
`be also be obtained by an input

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket