throbber
United States Patent c191
`Flamm
`
`I lllll llllllll Ill lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll 111111111111111111111111111111111
`US005304282A
`5,304,282
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent: Apr. 19, 1994
`
`[54] PROCESSES DEPENDING ON PLASMA
`DISCHARGES SUSTAINED IN A HELICAL
`RESONATOR
`
`(76]
`
`Inventor: Daniel L. Flamm, 476 Green View
`Dr., Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 686,763
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Apr. 17, 1991
`
`Int. Cl,5 ............................................. HOlL 21/00
`[51]
`[52] U.S. Cl ..... ~ ................... ; ........... 156/643; 156/345;
`118/723 E; 427/551
`[58] Field of Search .................. 156/643, 345; 427/38,
`427/551; 118/723 E
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`4,033,287 7/1977 Alexander et al ................. 118/49.1
`4,310,380 1/1982 Flamm et al ........................ 156/643
`4,368,092 1/1983 Steinberg et al. .
`4,918,031 4/1990 Flamm et al. ....................... 156/643
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`"Coaxial Resonators with Helical Inner Conductor";
`
`Proceedings of the IRE; @1958; pp. 2099-2105; Macal(cid:173)
`pine et al.
`"Application of a Ion-Pressure Radio Frequency Dis(cid:173)
`charge Source to Polysilicon Gate Etching"; Cook et
`al.; J. Vac. Science B 8(1); Feb. 1990; pp. 1-4.
`"Silicon Oxide Deposition From Tetraoxysilane in a
`Radio Frequency Downstream Reactor: Mechanisms
`and Step Coverage"; Selamoglu et al.; J. Vac. Science B
`7(6); Dec. 1989; pp. 1345-1351.
`Primary Examiner-William A. Powell
`Assistant Examiner-George Goudreau
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Roger S. Borovoy
`[57]
`ABSTRACT
`Plasma etching and deposition is accomplished utilizing
`a helical resonator constructed with an inner diameter
`coil greater than 60 percent of the outer shield diameter.
`The diameter of the conductor used to form the coil is
`not critical and can be less than 40 percent of the wind(cid:173)
`ing pitch in some applications. These parameters permit
`helical resonator plasma sources to be more compact
`and economical, and facilitate improved uniformity for
`processing large substrates.
`
`18 Claims, 1 Drawing Sheet
`
`r--'-10
`
`40
`
`42
`
`~~~-----
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 8
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1013
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 19, 1994
`Apr. 19, 1994
`
`5,304,282
`5,304,282
`
`FIG. 1
`FIG. 1
`y----10
`
`20
`20
`
`2
`
`4
`
`,.
`
`iiiCOC
`
`i,i
`C.
`
`:li
`
`44
`
` ItilIltzlllc535131!
`
`
`32
`
`46
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1
`
`PROCESSES DEPENDING ON PLASMA
`DISCHARGES SUSTAINED IN A HELICAL
`RESONATOR
`
`2
`Etching An Introduction, ed. D. M. Manos and D. L.
`Flamm, Academic Press, San Diego, 1989, pp. 2-87,
`have been employed to induce anisotropic etching.
`Planar reactors have also been used to produce species
`S for isotropic etching (as described in U.S. Pat. No.
`BACKGROUND AND FIELD OF THE
`4,310,380 dated Jan. 12, 1982) and for the deposition of
`INVENTION
`thin films (as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,033,287 dated
`1. Field of the Invention
`Jul. 5, 1977). It is well known to the worker in the field
`This invention relates to plasma processing and in
`that when appropriate gaseous chemistries are em-
`particular to plasma processing of devices using a heli- 10 ployed, such as those described by V. M. Donnelly and
`cal resonator.
`D. L. Flamm in Solid State Technology, pp. 161-166
`2. Description of the Prior Art
`(April, 1981), species from practically any plasma dis-
`Plasma discharges are extensively utilized in the fab-
`charge apparatus can be used to induce isotropic etch-
`rication of devices such as semiconductor devices and,
`ing and anisotropic etching can be achieved with appro-
`in particular, silicon semiconductor devices. For exam- lS priate chemistries using suitable pressures and reactor
`pie, plasma discharges in appropriate precursor gases
`geometries. (Representative chemistries and conditions
`are utilized to induce formatfon of a solid on a deposi-
`are described by D. L. Flamm in Plasma Etching An
`tion substrate. (One important embodiment of such a
`Introduction, ed. D. M. Manos and D. L. Flamm, Aca-
`pr~dure is called plasma assisted chemical vapor de-
`demic Press, San Diego, 1989, pp. 91-183.)
`posi~ion.) In a SC?ond plasma del?<'.ndent procedure, 20 Radiofrequency structures such as helicon antenna
`species generated in a plasma are utilized to etch a sub-
`structures and helical resonators have also been used to
`strate, e.g .. a device .substr~te bein~ proces.sed which
`generate plasmas which form appropriate anisotropic
`_gener~ly includes di~lect~c maten~, semicoi;id.uctor
`and isotropic etching species. For example, D. Vender,
`matenal and/or matenal with metallic conductivity.
`"Etching in an Externally Excited RF Plasma" Physics
`I.n plasma-assisted deposition proc~ures the desired 25 Research Laboratory Report No. 87, The Australian
`soh?.is C?mm~nly formed by the rc:ac~on of a ~as co~-
`National University, Oct. 28, 1988 describes isotropic
`position in a d~scharge. In one v.anatic:>n, reactive rad1-
`and anisotropic etching below 10 mTorr in a helicon
`ca!(s) fonD;ed in the Ji>lasma regi~n, cit.her alone or as
`structure while isotropic etching conducted above 10
`·bed· us p t N 4 368 092 d t d J
`mixed outside of the discharge region with a second gas,
`T
`· d
`· · a · 0
`are flowed over a deposition substrate remote from the 30 ~ ~~;s escn
`in
`a e
`an.

`•
`•
`discharge to form the desired solid film. In another
`'
`· .
`.
`.
`.
`The hehcal reson~tor mcludes 8':1 outside ~eld en-
`variation, the substrate is surrounded by a plasma which
`clo~ure of ai;i electncal~y con?uct1ve mate?al, e.g. a
`supplies charged species for energetic ion bombard-
`ment. The plasma tends to aid in rearranging and stabi-
`cyl~der, an ~te~al h~hcal coil of. an electn~ally coi;i-
`lizing the film provided the bombardment is not suffi- 35 duct1ve .matenal, 1f desired, an a~phed magnetic field in
`ciently energetic to damage the underlying substrate or
`the region enclosed by the coil to enhance electron
`the growing film.
`co~finem~nt, and means. for applying an RF ~eld to .t~e
`In some etching procedures, a pattern is etched into
`coil. Typ1~ly, the outs1d~ enclosur~ and hehcal coil 1s
`the substrate by utilizing a mask having openings corre-
`of ~ electnc~ly conductive m~tenal ~uc~ as cop~er.
`sponding to this pattern. This mask is usually formed by 40 Design of. hehcal reso11:ators wi~h cylin.dncal outside
`depositing a polymeric photosensitive layer, exposing
`enclosure 1s generally discussed in W. ~ichak, Proc. of
`the layer with suitable radiation to change the solubility
`IRE, page ~315 (1954~. However helical resonators
`of the exposed regions, and then utilizing the induced
`used to. sustain plas~a ~1sch~ges have been coi;istru~ted
`change in solubility to form the desired pattern through
`~ccording to the ci:itena, design rules and specifications
`a solvation process. In other etching procedures, an 45 in W. W. Macalpine et al., Proc. of IRE, page 2099
`overlayer of material is selectively removed from the
`(1959) and generation of a plasma with these resonators
`sublayers without use of a mask (the polymeric mask
`is described in C. W. Haldeman et al, Air Force Re-
`itself can be removed by this procedure after a pattern
`search Lab Technical Research Report, 69-0148 acces-
`is transferred. This etching procedure is termed strip-
`sion No. TL501.M41, A25 No. 156. The cross section
`so view in FIG . .2 on page 2100 of Macalpine et al. illus-
`ping).

`For most present day device applications, it is desir-
`trates the helical resonator components of a helical
`able to produce etching at an acceptable etch rate. (Ac-
`resonator plasma discharge structure. The symbols used
`ceptable etch rates depend upon the material to be re-
`in the following discussion correspond to those in FIG.
`moved and are generally those that remove at least 2%
`.2 of Macalpine. Macalpine et al. teach that to obtain
`of the layer thickness in a minute.) Additionally, the ss optimum electrical characteristic the ratio ofd/D of the
`production of a relatively high etching rate leads to
`mean diameter of the helical inner coil of the resonator,
`shorter processing times.
`d, to the inside diameter, D, of the outside enclosure is
`In one etching method known as anisotropic etching,
`chosen to have a value between 0.4 and 0.6 and further
`that the ratio, do/T of the diameter of the wire from
`appropriate charged species generated in the plasma
`produce directional energetic ion bombardment that 60 which the coil is wound, d0 to the pitch of the coil, T,
`induces etching on the substrate surface. Another etch-
`(the pitch is the number of turns per lineal inch in a
`ing procedure known as isotropic etching utilizes reac-
`direction parallel to the central axis of the structure) is
`tive neutral species produced by the plasma to induce
`chosen to have a value between 0.4 and 0.7. (For this
`etching of the substrate.
`purpose optimum electrical characteristic is a high un-
`Various structures for producing the desired plasma 65 loaded electrical O. commonly represented by the sym-
`bol 0 11• 0 11 is the O inherent to a helical resonator struc-
`discharges have been employed. For example, planar
`parallel plate reactors and reactors having hexagonal
`ture when there is no plasma present, i.e. a plasma has
`not been ignited. In general, O is defined as the maxi-
`electrodes as described in D. L. Flamm et al., Plasma
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`

`5,304,282
`
`4
`3
`of Materials in Alicante, Spain, Sep. 4-16, 1988. (An
`mum instantaneous energy stored in the resonator dur-
`abbreviated summary of this process is in G. Cicala et
`ing a cycle of the excitation frequency divided by the
`al., Plasma-Surface Interactions and Processing of Materi-
`power dissipated in the resonator structure during a
`als, edited by 0. Auciello et al., NATO ASI Series E:
`cycle of the RF excitation. For the purpose of measur-
`ing unloaded Q, plasma ignition may be suppressed by 5 Applied Sciences, Vol. 176, Kluwer Academic Publish-
`ers, The Netherlands, 1990, pps. 171-173).
`evacuating the dielectric tube to below lQ-6 Torr, or
`pressurizing the tube to 760 Torr with an inert gas such
`It is well known that pulsing the power to the plasma
`discharge or pulsing the feed gas flow can be advanta-
`as helium).
`lt is well known to workers in the field that the same
`geous for higher deposition rates, improved etching
`design principles utilized for resonators with circular 10 anisotropy or better uniformity under appropriate con-
`outside shields also apply to helical resonators with an
`ditions (for example, G. Cicala et al. describe a pulsing
`outside shield in the form of a simple polygonal cross
`procedure useful to increase deposition rates).
`section. For example, the design of helical resonators
`Helical resonator plasma structures are simple to
`with shield of square cross section is described in Zve-
`manufacture compared to other large diameter plasma
`rev et al., IRE Transactions on Component Parts, pp. 15 sources that are useful for deposition and etching such
`99-110, Sept. 1961. Zverev et al. teach that a square
`as electron cyclotron resonance reactors (see Suzuki et
`al. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 126, 1024
`shield with side oflength S is equivalent in properties to
`a circular cylindrical shield of diameter 1.2 S.
`(1979) for a description of etching in this type of reac-
`The plasma discharge is contained within a low loss
`tor, commonly referred to as ECR). However helical
`dielectric, insulating enclosure (e.g., a quartz tube) that 20 resonator reactors have not been entirely desirable in
`the past because their design was thought to be limited
`passes through the helical coil and is preferably concen-
`tric with the inner coil of the resonator. The dimensions
`to the range of dimensional ratio and size parameters
`of the dielectric enclosure must be less than the inner
`given by Macalpine et al. Resonators which conform to
`diameter of the helical coil.
`the scaling relationships taught by Macalpine et al. tend
`It is possible to operate the helical resonator dis- 25 to be cumbersome and may be unsuitable for device
`processing. This will be illustrated by example below.
`charge in a quarter wave mode (as described by Halde-
`man) or in a half wave mode as employed in the plasma
`To achieve a highly uniform etching rate (when the
`polymerization coating process described by S. L. Letts
`plasma is used for etching) or a highly uniform rate of
`et al. in "Laser Program Annual Report-1978, Volume
`chemical vapor deposition which is required to grow an
`1, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Report UCRL- 30 even film thickness over the entire surface of a sub-
`50021-78, edited by M. J. Monsler and B. D. Jarman, pp.
`strate, the diameter of the inner dielectric tube within
`4-7 through 4-11, March 1989. (A detailed blueprint for
`the resonator should be as large or preferably larger
`a production version of this helical resonator plasma
`than the substrate that is to be processed. Plasma
`deposition coating reactor is contained in Lawrence
`sources having a diameter that is smaller than the sub-
`Livermore Laboratory Drawing No. AAA-78-107861- 35 strate diameter tend to produce nonuniform rates.
`00 created by R. Dowrick in 1978. S. Letts of the Law-
`(When the etching rate is nonuniform, it may nonethe-
`rence Livermore Laboratory has informed me that this
`less be possible to etch a film layer for device fabrica-
`design was made freely available to other laboratories
`tion if the inherent chemical selectivities for etching the
`prior to 1985 and units were constructed according to
`film relative to the masking layer and film sublayer are
`this blueprint and operated by KMS Fusion, Inc. of Ann 40 sufficiently high. However such nonuniformity is unde-
`sirable because it reduces process latitude. Precise selec-
`Arbor Mich. and the University of Rochester.) In the
`quarter wave mode it is possible to connect one end of
`tivity requirements corresponding to specified etch rate
`the coil to the outer shield and to insulate and separate
`variability are determined from the mathematical rela-
`tionships published in Flamm et al., Plasma Etching An
`the opposite end from the shield to reduce capacitance
`coupling. In a half wave mode device both ends are 45 Introduction, ed. D. M. Manos and D. L. Flamm, Aca-
`demic Press, San Diego, 1989, pp. 91-183, and incorpo-
`advantageously grounded (Grounding, although not
`essential to its operation, tends to reduce coupling to
`rated herein by reference.) In addition, tube diameters
`metallic objects near the ends and improves confine-
`which are smaller than the substrate diameter tend to
`ment of the plasma).
`produce divergent plasma flows when species from the
`Rather weak magnetic fields may be used to enhance 50 resonator source move radially to reach the surface that
`the plasma density obtained from RF resonant struc-
`is etched. To meet high accuracy pattern transfer re-
`tures. For example, Boswell et al. in Applied Physics
`quirements for submicron device manufacture, trajecto-
`Letters, 50, 1130 (1987) show that the plasma density
`ries of ions impacting the substrate surface should be
`downstream of an inductively coupled source operating
`collinear and perpendicular to the substrate surface. A
`below 1 mTorr is more than doubled when a magnetic 55 divergent plasma flow such as that from a narrow tube
`to a wider diameter substrate tends to induce a system-
`field strength of about 20 gauss is applied.
`It is possible to position longitudinally conducting
`atic variation in the angle between ion trajectories and
`elements along the outside of the low loss dielectric
`a perpendicular to the surface which limits the size of a
`discharge tube. For example, the Lawrence Livermore
`substrate and the minimum feature dimensions which
`Laboratories coating reactor utilizes a split metallic 60 can be processed (the effects on etching characteristics
`are discussed by s, Samukawa et al. in "Proceedings of
`shield between the outside of the quartz tube and the
`resonator coil. A heater formed from longitudinal con-
`the 1989 Dry Process Symposium," pp. 27-32, pub-
`lished by The Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan,
`ducting elements with relatively high circumferential
`resistance can be advantageously used to heat substrates
`Tokyo, 1989).
`positioned within the discharge tube to permit chemical 65 A high unloaded helical resonator Q has been consid-
`ered essential for the operation of helical resonator
`vapor deposition at elevated temperature as was de-
`scribed by G. Cicala at the NATO Advanced Study
`plasma structures. Consequently, helical resonators
`Institute on Pl3.!1ma-Surface Interactions and Processing
`made to sustain plasma discharges have hitherto been
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`

`5,304,282
`
`5
`6
`constructed in conformance with the dimensional seal-
`the dielectric tube (26) must be significantly larger than
`ing relationships for optimum Q taught by Macalpine et
`the diameter of the substrate ((42) to allow the wafers to
`al. These scaling relationships require the ratio, d/D, of
`be supported in this volume for processing. Thus a
`the coil diameter, d, to the shield diameter, D, to be
`quartz inner tube with an inside diameter in excess of
`between 0.45 and 0.6. Additionally, Macalpine et al. S 250 millimeters is suitable for processing 200 millimeter
`. teach that the ratio, b/D, of the axial length of the coil,
`diameter wafers. A useful wall thickness for this tube is
`1/16 inch. A space of at least i inch between the inner
`b, to the diameter of the shield, D, be greater than 1
`(b/D > 1 and that the diameter (do) of the conductor
`diameter of the helical coil and the outer wall of the
`used to wind the inner coil is fixed at a value between
`quartz tube is appropriate to accommodate normal vari-
`0.4 and 0.7 times the coil pitch (the coil pitch is defmed 10 ability in tube dimensions and to facilitate tube fusertion
`as the length of the coil divided by the number of turns
`during assembly. (At this point we assume the diameter
`in the coil). Indeed the importance of high Q and the use
`of a wire conductor used to wind the spiral resonator
`of this scaling law for isotropic helical resonator etching
`coil is 1.2 inches. Therefore the diameter, d, of the coil
`reactors are emphasized by Steinberg et al. in U.S. Pat.
`(22) needed to accommodate this 250 mm discharge
`No. 4,368,092 dated Jan. 11, 1983. Cook et al. (in the IS tube will be about 13 inches. The scaling relations given
`Joumal of Vacuum Science and Technology B, pps. 1-4,
`by Macalpine et al. require that the diameter of the
`1990 and also in the Joumal of Vacuum Science and
`shield surrounding a 13-inch coil be at least 1.66 times
`Technology A, pps. 1820-1824, 1991) state that resonator
`this diameter which is in this instance is 21.6 inches.
`structures suitable for helical resonator discharge
`According to the scaling relations, the overall length of
`sources used for anisotropic etching generally have an 20 the resonator structure is chosen to be about two times
`unloaded Q 9f 1000-2000 and a high Z 0 • (Z0 is the char-
`the coil diameter or 21.6 inches. Thus accepted teaching
`acteristic impedance of the helical resonator as given in
`requires that minimum dimensions of a resonator struc-
`Reference Data for Radio Engineers, fourth edition, pp.
`ture for processing 200 millimeter wafers be approxi-
`600-603, ed. H. P. Westman, International Telephone
`mately 21.6 inches in diameter and 21.6 inches in height,
`and Radio Corp., New York, 1956 and incorporated by 25 exclusive of the vacuum chamber dimensions (44) and
`reference herein.) Furthermore helical resonator struc-
`wafer loading mechanisms (loading mechanisms are not
`tures employed for plasma assisted chemical vapor de-
`a feature of this invention and hence are not shown in
`position such as the designs used for polymer deposition
`FIG. 1. FIG. 4 in Macalpine et al. determines that for
`by Letts et al., as well as the resonator employed by
`operation at 13.S6 MHz a helical resonator constructed
`Cicala et al., and the apparatus used for downstream 30 with above dimensions will have approximately 6 turns
`silicon oxide deposition by Selamoglu et al. (as de-
`of wire at a pitch, 'T of about 3 inches per inch for opera-
`scribed in The Journal of Vacuum Science and Technol-
`tion at 13.S6 MHz (this frequency is allocated for indus-
`ogy B 7, 134S, 1989) were constructed with the dimen-
`trial use and is the most common frequency used for
`sional relationships for high Q taught by Macalpine and
`plasma processing). The diameter of the conductor used
`Schildknecht.
`35 to wind this coil then is chosen to be 1.2 inches from the
`However the scaling relationships taught by Macal-
`permitted range of 1.2-2.1 inches satisfying the limits
`pine et al. yield helical resonator structures with dimen-
`0.4<do/T<0.7 given by Macalpine. (Note that this is
`sions that tend to be cumbersome, and are often unsuit-
`consistent with the wire diameter already chosen). The
`able or unduly constraining for device processing. In
`discharge tube thus subtends less than half of the overall
`both of the referenced reports Cook et al. note that the 40 diameter of this structure and the large conductor struc-
`diameters of quartz discharge tubes in the resonators
`tures are massive and bulky.
`they used not only were smaller than the inner coil
`EXAMPLE2
`diameter, but had to be further limited because of the
`space occupied by dielectric material needed to support
`Recently it has been found that RF plasma excitation
`the helical coil. This bulkiness and the tube size con- 45
`frequencies above 13.S6 MHz (for example in the range
`straint limit the usefulness of helical resonator discharge
`of SO MHz) can be advantageous to reduce harmful
`structures conforming to formulae given in Macalpine
`effects of the plasma on electrical characteristics of a
`et al. The seriousness of this limitation is illustrated by
`completed device (described, for example, by Goto et
`the following two examples.
`al. in Solid State Technology, 34(2), pp. S13-Sl6, Febru-
`SO ary 1991). Although helical resonator reactors con(cid:173)
`EXAMPLE 1
`structed for 13.S6 MHz operation according to the
`Films on ISO millimeter and 200 millimeter diameter
`teachings of Macalpine et al. are quite inconvenient,
`silicon wafers are etched using plasma assisted tech-
`corresponding designs for operating at higher fre-
`niques for the production of integrated circuits. In the
`quency are impractical. For example, a resonator struc-
`manufacture of these circuits, films are also deposited SS ture constructed with dimensions suitable for process(cid:173)
`on wafers of this size by plasma assisted chemical vapor
`ing 200 millimeter wafers and operating with 50 MHz
`deposition. When wafers are processed downstream of
`· excitation should contain an inside coil diameter of
`a helical resonator discharge such as that illustrated in
`approximately 13 inches diameter as described above.
`FIG. 1, the inside diameter of the dieleetric discharge
`Thus the required outside shield diameter is about 21.6
`tube (26) in the helical resonator structure is preferably 60 inches by the same reasoning. However for a helical
`larger than the substrate wafer diameter (42) in order to
`resonator structure of these dimensions to be in reso-
`avoid excessive plasma divergence and to achieve a
`nance at SO MHz, the formal design formulae in Macal-.
`high flux of reactive species downstream of the dis-
`pine specify a spiral coil with fewer than 2 turns and
`charge. Furthermore it may be desirable to process · more than 10 inches of axial length along each turn (also
`wafers within the resonator plasma volume (40) as ex- 65 the conductor used to wind the coil should be more
`emplified by the silicon nitride deposition process de-
`than 1.7 inches in diameter). These values are in a pa-
`scribed by Cicala et al. In order to process wafers
`rameter space, according to Macalpine et al., where use
`within the resonator plasma, the inner diameter of the
`of helical resonators is undesirable.
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`

`

`5,304,282
`
`7
`It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to
`create a new and improved helical resonator plasma
`discharge structure which is compact and better suited
`for processing substrates, and is in particular better for
`processing substrates for semiconductor device manu(cid:173)
`facture. It is a further object of the present invention to
`provide convenient helical resonator plasma discharge
`structures which operate above 21 MHz and are suit(cid:173)
`able for processing large substrates.
`
`8
`than 500. However, when a plasma discharge suitable
`for substrate processing is present in the resonator struc(cid:173)
`ture, the potentials and currents which determine the
`characteristics of the plasma depend on the Q estab-
`S lished during operation of plasma discharge system.
`(This is known as the loaded Q of the resonator. The
`loaded Q is the ratio of the maximum instantaneous
`energy stored in the resonator during a cycle of the
`excitation frequency to the power dissipated in the reso-
`10 nator structure during a cycle of the RF excitation
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`when a plasma is ignited.) It has been determined that
`It has been found that not only are the accepted di-
`the loaded Q during plasma processing of substrates in
`mensional scaling relationships for helical resonators
`helical resonator reactors is unexpectedly low, gener-
`given by Macalpine et al. bulky, cumbersome and some-
`ally less than about 50. It will be understood that this
`times impractical for plasma processing reactors, but IS loaded Q is low and is substantially less than the un-
`loaded Q, the magnitude of the unloaded Q is not a
`that this scaling is in fact unnecessary for the operation
`of helical resonator plasma reactors. It has been further
`significant parameter for appropriate operation of the
`plasma reactor. (For this purpose, the unloaded Q is
`found that helical resonator plasma reactors with coil to
`shield diameter ratios greater than those hitherto be-
`considered substantially less than the loaded Q when
`lievcd to be useful can provide a larger plasma diameter 20 the unloaded Q is five times the loaded Q.) Thus this
`and a greater integral flux of species from a specified
`invention involves selecting dimensions for helical reso-
`resonator structure diameter. In fact such helical reso-
`nators used for plasma processing of device substrates
`nator discharges are an excellent source of species for
`that are more convenient and economical than helical
`procedures such as etching, chemical vapor deposition,
`resonators designed according to past art. The inventive
`surface modification and ion implantation.
`2S helical resonators employ dimensional ratios outside of
`Indeed, helical resonator plasma reactors which uti-
`the range taught by Macalpine et al., and in particular
`lize a plasma volume inside a coil diameter that is more
`utilize a coil diameter to shield diameter ratio, d/D,
`which is larger than 0.6. The unloaded Q is generally
`than 60 percent of the outer helical resonator shield
`diameter can readily operate with a loaded Q which is
`chosen to be at least four times the loaded Q. In prac-
`similar to the loaded Q found in reactors that conform 30 tice, this criterion will usually be realized when the
`unloaded Q is designed to be larger than 250. The de-
`to the criteria taught by Macalpine et al. Furthermore,
`coils for helical resonator reactors wound using con-
`sired operating plasma processing conditions in the
`ductors with diameters less than a factor of 0.4 times the
`inventive helical resonator plasma discharge are ad-
`pitch can operate with values ofloaded system Q which
`justed by procedures such as adjusting the position of
`are approximately the same as those found in helical 3S the tap (36) where the power source is connected to the
`resonator plasma reactors conforming to the dimen-
`coil (as shown in FIG. 1) to minimize power reflected to
`sional ratios given by Macalpine et al.
`the RF generator, and adjusting the excitation fre-
`quency to resonance. A high Z 0 value for the resonator
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`is helpful for anisotropic etching at low pressure. How(cid:173)
`FIG. 1 is illustrative of a helical resonator plasma 40 ever the value of this parameter is not a direct function
`of Q and may be set within wide limits as in prior art.
`discharge apparatus suitable for practicing the inven-
`The main effect of reduced unloaded Q is that the
`tion.
`plasma reactor will exhibit a lower electrical efficiency
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`than a similar reactor conforming to the teachings of
`The invention involves the use of a helical resonator 4S Macalpine et al. (For this purpose a similar reactor has
`with an inner coil diameter greater than 0.6 times the
`the same inside dielectric plasma tube diameter.) Of
`outer shield diameter to produce a plasma in a gas at
`course it is clear, according to teachings of this inven-
`low pressure (typically in the range of 10-s Torr to 150
`tion, that Macalpine's criteria are extremely restrictive
`Torr) for processing such as etching procedures or
`and it may not always be possible to build which con-
`deposition procedures. An inner coil dimension substan- SO forms to Macalpine's criteria and is similar in this sense.
`tially larger than 0.6 times the shield has hitherto been
`The electrical efficiency of loaded resonators such as
`considered inadequate for plasma reactors because
`helical resonator plasma reactors is governed by the
`ratio of unloaded to loaded Q values. An electrical
`structures incorporating such coils have lower un-
`loaded Q values than those with coil diameters of 0.45
`· efficiency of 80 percent is generally acceptable for con-
`to 0.6 times the shield diameter. However it has been SS ventional parallel plate or hexode plasma reactor and
`determined that a high unloaded Q is ordinarily super-
`matching network combinations generally used for
`fluous and the practice of optimizing unloaded Q im-
`processing. Helical resonator plasma reactors require
`posed burdensome and unnecessary constraints on heli-
`no matching network and an unloaded Q in excess of
`four times the loaded Q is acceptable.
`cal resonator plasma reactors constructed to the previ-
`ous art.
`60 Operation of an ordinary helical resonator plasma
`Practitioners of the art believed that a high unloaded
`reactor with dimensions conforming to Macalpine et al.
`resonator Q was imperative for efficient and reliable
`illustrate the unexpectedly low Q characterizing past
`operation of helical resonator plasma processing reac-
`practice. A quarter wave resonator was constructed
`tors. For this reason, helical resonator plasma structures
`according to the formulae in Macalpine et al. using a 12
`have hitherto been designed in conformance with the 6S inch long, 8 in. O.D. cylindrical copper shield contain-
`ing a 27 turn 6.5 in. long, helical coil, 22, of i in. O.D.
`optimal Q sizing parameters taught by Macalpine et al.
`In general the unloaded Q of helical resonators used for
`copper tubing, 4.5 in. O.D. centered within the shield.
`plasma reactor structures has been designed to be more
`The bottom of the coil was short circuited to the shield
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`

`

`5,304,282
`
`10
`9
`turns comprising the helical inner conductor is reduced
`by a silver solder connection (24) and the top of the coil
`was open circuited. The resonant frequency of this
`and the computation is repeated iteratively. Generally
`an unloaded Q in excess of 200 is desirable to attain a
`structure was approximately 9 MHz when there was no
`resonable power efficiency (approximately 80 percent
`plasma ignited. Power was coupled into the resonator
`by connecting a clip to the coil approximately 1.S turns s or more) when the plasma is operated. The unloaded Q
`above the shorted end. A quartz discharge tube approxi-
`corresponding to a design is also estimated by the rela-
`tionships in Sichak. If the unloaded Q so computed is
`mately 60 mm O.D. passed concentrically through the
`helical coil and was mated to a quartz walled reaction
`less than the desired vlaue, the diameter of the outer
`conducting shield (10) is increased or the pitch of the
`chamber, (44), by o-ring seals. A plasma was ignited in
`a feed gas consisting of 20 percent oxygen and 80 per- 10 inner coil (22) is adjusted to increase the estimated Q
`cent nitrogen and the input power was determined to be
`corresponding to the resonator structure. At high fre-
`46 watts at the operating resonant frequency

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket