throbber
Europaisches Patentamt
`
`European Patent Office
`
`Office europeen des brevets
`
`I lllllll llllll Ill lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll 111111111111111111111111111111111
`0 421 430 A2
`
`@ Publication number:
`

`
`EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION
`
`@ Application number: 90119065.2
`
`@ Int. Cl.5; H01J 37/32, H05H 1/46
`
`@ Date of filing: 04.10.90
`
`@) Priority: 03.10.89 US 416750
`
`@ Date of publication of application:
`10.04.91 Bulletin 91/15
`
`@ Designated Contracting States:
`BE DE ES FR GB IT NL
`
`@ Applicant: APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
`P.O. Box 58039 3050 Bowers Avenue
`Santa Clara California 95052(US)
`
`@ Inventor: Mintz, Donald M.
`1633 S. Mary Ave.
`Sunnyvale, CA 94087(US)
`
`@ A plasma process, method and apparatus.
`
`@) A plasma process method and apparatus ca(cid:173)
`pable of operation significantly above 13.56 MHz can
`produce reduced self-bias voltage of the powered
`electrode to enable softer processes that do not
`damage thin layers that are increasingly becoming
`common in high speed and high density integrated
`circuits. A nonconventional match network is used to
`enable elimination of reflections at these higher fre(cid:173)
`quencies. Automatic control of match network com(cid:173)
`ponents enables the rf frequency to be adjusted to
`ignite the plasma and then to operate at a variable
`frequency selected to minimize process time without
`significant damage to the integrated circuit.
`
`....
`N
`~
`Q
`
`0.. w
`
`Inventor: Hanawa, Hiroji
`3427 Flora Vista
`Santa Clara, CA 95051 (US)
`Inventor: Somekh, Sasson
`25625 Moody Road
`Los Altos Hills, CA 94022(US)
`Inventor: Maydan, Dan
`12000 Murietta Lane
`Los Altos Hills, CA 94022(US)
`
`@ Representative: Diehl, Hermann Dr.
`Diehl & Glaeser, Hiltl & Partner
`FIUggenstrasse 13
`W-8000 MUnchen 19(DE)
`
`a -
`

`
`Igniting Plasma
`
`b
`
`Maintaining Pressure
`
`a2
`
`Adjusting Match Network
`
`c
`
`Providing Power
`At Optimized Frequency
`
`Figure 3
`
`Xerox Copy Centre
`
`Page 1 of 11
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1012
`
`

`

`EP 0 421 430 A2
`
`2
`
`A PLASMA PROCESS, METHOD AND APPARATUS
`
`This invention relates in general to semicon(cid:173)
`ductor wafer processing method and apparatus.
`Plasma etching of wafers is attractive because
`it can be anisotropic, can be chemically selective,
`can produce etch under conditions far from ther(cid:173)
`modynamic equilibrium, utilizes a reduced amount
`of etchant chemicals compared to wet etch pro(cid:173)
`cesses and produces a significantly
`reduced
`amount of waste products. The reduction of etchant
`chemicals and waste products produces a cost
`savings. The anisotropic etch enables the produc(cid:173)
`tion of substantially vertical sidewalls which is im(cid:173)
`portant in present day processes in which the
`depth of etch and feature size and spacing are all
`comparable. The ability to choose etch chemicals
`and process parameters to produce chemical se(cid:173)
`lectivity of the etch enables these choices to be
`made to etch the desired material without substan(cid:173)
`tially etching other features of the integrated cir(cid:173)
`cuits being produced. Choices of process param(cid:173)
`eters that produce process conditions far from ther(cid:173)
`modynamic equilibrium can be used to lower pro(cid:173)
`cess temperature, thereby avoiding high tempera(cid:173)
`tures that can deleteriously affect the integrated
`circuits under fabrication.
`In Figure 1 is shown a plasma reactor 10. This
`reactor includes an aluminum wall 11 that encloses
`a plasma reactor chamber 12. Wall 11 is grounded
`and functions as one of the plasma electrodes.
`Gases are supplied to chamber 12 from a gas
`source 13 and are exhausted by an exhaust sys(cid:173)
`tem 14 that actively pumps gases out of the reac(cid:173)
`tor to maintain a low pressure suitable for a plasma
`process. An rf power supply 15 provides power to
`a second (powered) electrode 16 to generate a
`plasma within chamber 12. Wafers 17 are trans(cid:173)
`ferred into and out of reactor chamber 12 through a
`port such as slit valve 18.
`A plasma consists of two qualitatively different
`regions: the substantially neutral, conductive plas(cid:173)
`ma body 19 and a boundary layer 110 called the
`plasma sheath. The plasma body consists of sub(cid:173)
`stantially equal densities of negative and positive
`charged particles as well as radicals and stable
`neutral particles. The plasma sheath is an electron
`deficient, poorly conductive region in which the
`electric field strength is large. The plasma sheath
`forms between the plasma body and any interface
`such as the walls and electrodes of the plasma
`reactor chamber and the rf electrodes.
`Semiconductor process plasmas are produced
`by a radio frequency (rf) field at 13.56 MHz that
`couples energy into free electrons within the cham(cid:173)
`ber, imparting sufficient energy to many of these
`electrons that ions can be produced through colli-
`
`10
`
`20
`
`sions of these electrons with gas molecules. Typi(cid:173)
`cally, the walls of the reactor chamber are metal
`(though often coated with thin insulating layers) so
`that they can function as one of the rf electrodes.
`s When the walls do not function as one of the
`electrodes, they still affect the process by confining
`the plasma and by contributing capacitive coupling
`to the plasma reactor.
`The 13.56 MHz frequency is substantially uni-
`versally utilized in plasma reactors because this
`frequency is an ISM (Industry, Scientific, Medical)
`standard frequency for which the government man(cid:173)
`dated radiation limits are less stringent than at non(cid:173)
`ISM frequencies, particularly those within the com·
`15 munication bands. This substantial universal use of
`13.56 MHz
`is further encouraged by the
`large
`amount of equipment available at that frequency
`because of this ISM standard. Other ISM standard
`frequencies are at 27.12 and 40.68 MHz, which are
`first and second order harmonics of the 13.56 MHz
`ISM standard frequency. A further advantage of the
`13.56 MHz frequency is that, since the lowest two
`order harmonies of this frequency are also ISM
`standard
`frequencies, equipment utilizing 13.56
`25 MHz is less likely to exceed allowable limits at
`harmonies of the fundamental frequency of such
`equipment.
`When the powered rf electrode is capacitively
`coupled to the rf power source, a de self bias Vdc
`of this electrode results. The magnitude of this self
`bias V de is a function of the ion density and elec(cid:173)
`tron temperature within the plasma. A negative self·
`bias de voltage Vdc of the powered electrode on
`the order of several hundreds of volts is commonly
`produced (see, for example, J. Coburn and E. Kay,
`Positive-ion bombardment of substrates in rt
`diode glow discharge sputtering, J. Appl. Phys.,
`43 p. 4965 (1972). This self bias de voltage V de is
`useful in producing a high energy flux of positive
`ions against the powered electrode. Therefore, in a
`plasma etching process, a wafer 17 to be etched is
`positioned on or slightly above the powered elec(cid:173)
`trode 16 so that this flux of positive ions is incident
`substantially perpendicular to the top surface of the
`wafer, thereby producing substantially vertical etch(cid:173)
`ing of unprotected regions of the wafer.
`These high voltages enable etch rates that are
`required for the etch process to be commercially
`attractive. Because of the susceptibility of the small
`(submicron) geometry devices available today to
`damage by a small amount of particulates, in(cid:173)
`tegrated circuit (IC) process systems are available
`that enable several IC process steps to be ex(cid:173)
`ecuted before reexposing the wafer to ambient
`atmosphere (see, for example, the multichamber
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 11
`
`

`

`3
`
`EP 0 421 430 A2
`
`4
`
`system illustrated in U.S. patent 4,785,962 entitled
`Vacuum Chamber Slit Valve, issued to Masato
`Tashima on November 22, 1988). This small geom(cid:173)
`etry has also produced a trend toward single wafer
`process steps (as opposed to multiwafer process(cid:173)
`ing steps that are common in
`larger geometry
`devices) so that processing can be sufficiently uni(cid:173)
`form over the entire wafer that these small geome(cid:173)
`try features can be produced throughout the wafer.
`Because the wafer throughput of the system is
`limited to the throughput of the slowest of the
`series of process steps within such a system, it is
`important that none of these sequential steps take
`significantly longer than the other steps in the
`process or else such slow step will serve as a
`bottleneck to system throughput. Presently, typical
`system throughput is on the order of 60 wafers per
`hour. For example, the· fundamental etch prior to
`metal 2 deposition is performed at a rate equivalent
`to a 250 Angstroms • per minute silicon dioxide
`etch rate. This permits the removal of approxi(cid:173)
`mately 70 Angstroms of aluminum oxide in con(cid:173)
`tacts to aluminum metal 1 in approximately 40
`seconds using a nonselective argon-only process.
`These etch conditions are used routinely in wafer
`fabrication and produce a 1500-1600 volt self bias
`at the powered electrode.
`Transistor speed specifications and high device
`densities in the most modern MOS integrated cir(cid:173)
`cuits have required the use of shallow junctions
`and thin gate oxides. Unfortunately, such IC struc(cid:173)
`tures are sensitive to ion bombardment by high
`energy ions such as those utilized with conven(cid:173)
`tional 13.56 MHz plasma etch apparatus. There(cid:173)
`fore, it is advantageous in such IC processing to
`reduce the self-bias voltage of the powered elec(cid:173)
`trode to less than 500 volts negative self-bias using
`a nonselective argon-only process. Because wafer
`damage decreases with decreasing self-bias volt(cid:173)
`age, it would be even more advantageous to op(cid:173)
`erate at self-bias voltages closer to 300 V. Unfortu(cid:173)
`nately, at 13.56 MHz, this reduction of self-bias
`results in a much slower etch rate, which thereby
`significantly degrades process throughput.
`One solution has been to enhance the etch rate
`by use of magnets that produce containment fields
`that trap ions within the vicinity of the wafer, there(cid:173)
`by increasing the ion density at the wafer. The
`magnetic field confines energetic ions and elec(cid:173)
`trons by forcing them to spiral along helical orbits
`about the magnetic field lines. Such increased ion
`density at the wafer produces a concomitant in(cid:173)
`crease in etch rate without increasing the self bias
`potential, thereby enabling throughputs on the or(cid:173)
`der of 60 wafers per hour without damaging the
`wafers.
`In effect, the etch rate is preserved by
`
`* 1 Angstrom = .1 NM.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`increasing the current level to counter the de(cid:173)
`creased voltage drop across the plasma sheath at
`the wafer. Unfortunately, nonuniformities of the
`magnetic field of such "magnetically enhanced"
`plasma etching systems exhibit a decreased uni(cid:173)
`formity of etch rate over the surface of the wafer.
`To improve uniformity over the surface of the
`wafer, in one such system, the wafer is rotated
`about an axis that is perpendicular to and centered
`over the surface of the powered electrode. This
`produces at the wafer surface a time-averaged field
`improved
`that has cylindrical symmetry and an
`uniformity over the wafer and therefore produces
`increased etch uniformity over the surface of the
`wafer. However, this rotation produces within the
`plasma chamber undesirable mechanical motion
`that can produce particulates and increase con(cid:173)
`tamination. Alternatively, a rotating magnetic field
`can be produced by use of two magnetic coils
`driven by currents that are ninety degrees out of
`phase. Unfortunately, the controls and power sup(cid:173)
`plies for this scheme are relatively expensive and
`the etch uniformity is still not as good as in a
`plasma etch apparatus that does not include such
`25 magnets.
`Another solution to enhance the rate of plasma
`processing of wafers is the recently developed
`technique of electron cyclotron resonance. This
`technique has application to wafer cleaning, etching
`and deposition processes. In this technique, a plas(cid:173)
`ma is produced by use of a microwave source and
`a magnetic containment structure. Unfortunately,
`this technique, when applied to etching or chemical
`vapor deposition, exhibits poor radial uniformity
`and low throughput. In addition, it requires expen(cid:173)
`sive hardware that includes; (1) a complex vacuum
`pumping system; (2) a microwave power supply
`that must produce microwave power at an ex(cid:173)
`tremely accurate frequency and power level; (3) a
`large magnetic containment system that may in·
`clude large electromagnets; and (4) an rf or de
`power supply connected to the wafer electrode.
`The invention provides a high frequency semi(cid:173)
`conductor wafer processing method and apparatus
`and relates more particularly to the use of a plasma
`apparatus for wafer cleaning, wafer deposition and
`wafer etching.
`The invention provides a plasma process meth·
`od according to independent claim 1 and a plasma
`process apparatus according to independent claim
`14. Further advantageous features of the method
`and apparatus are evident from
`the dependent
`claims.
`the description and
`the drawings. The
`claims are intended to be a first non-limiting ap-
`proach of defining the invention in general terms.
`In a conventional plasma reactor, an
`igniter
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 11
`
`

`

`5
`
`EP 0 421 430 A2
`
`6
`
`electrode produces, within a low pressure gas, high
`energy electrons that have enough energy to ionize
`within the reactor chamber atoms and molecules
`struck by these high energy electrons. This results
`in a cascade of electrons that produce a plasma
`consisting of electrons, ions, radicals and stable
`neutral particles. The plasma is then maintained by
`a powered electrode of voltage lower than that of
`the igniter electrode. Sufficient rf power is coupled
`into the plasma to maintain a desired ion con(cid:173)
`centration, typically on the order of 108 -1011 cm-3.
`Typical the frequency of the rf power is in the
`range from 10 kHz to 30 MHz but the most com(cid:173)
`mon frequency is 13.56 MHz because this is high
`enough to produce reasonable ion concentrations
`and is an ISM (industry, scientific, medical) stan(cid:173)
`dard frequency that does not interfere with tele(cid:173)
`communications.
`Because the electrons are on the order of
`thousands to hundreds of thousands of times light(cid:173)
`er than the plasma ions, the electrons experience a
`proportionately greater acceleration than the ions
`and therefore acquire kinetic energies that are sig(cid:173)
`nificantly greater than those acquired by the ions.
`The effect of this is that the energy from the rf field
`is strongly coupled into electron kinetic energy and
`is only very weakly coupled into ion kinetic energy.
`These high energy electrons are also referred to as
`high temperature electrons. As a further result of
`this large mass difference between the electrons
`and the ions, collisions between the high energy
`electrons and the ions does not transfer much of
`the electron energy to the ions. The effect of this is
`that the electrons acquire a temperature that is
`typically on the order of 1-5 ev even though the
`other particles in the plasma remain substantially at
`the temperature of the walls of the plasma reactor
`chamber (on the order of 0.03 ev) or up· to a few
`hundred degrees Centigrade hotter.
`Because the electrons are much more mobile
`than the ions, they initially strike the walls of the
`reactor chamber at a greater rate than do the ions.
`The effect of this is that the plasma body becomes
`slightly electron deficient while the boundary layer
`sheath becomes substantially electron deficient.
`This also produces a positively charged layer at
`the interface between the plasma body and the
`plasma sheath. This net positive charge of the
`plasma body and boundary layer results in a plas(cid:173)
`ma body electrical potential Vp (usually called the
`"plasma potential") on the order of several times
`the electron mean kinetic energy divided by the
`electron charge. The potential in the bulk of the
`plasma is nearly constant while the largest part of
`the potential variation is across the sheaf. In an rf
`plasma, this sheath potential variation is also de(cid:173)
`pendent on various parameters including the area
`of the reactor chamber wall, the area of the power-
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`ed electrode, the pressure in the reactor chamber
`and the rf power input.
`In accordance with the illustrated preferred em(cid:173)
`bodiment, a plasma apparatus is presented that
`operates at frequencies higher than the 13.56 MHz
`frequency utilized in conventional plasma appara(cid:173)
`tus. Useful frequencies for plasma processing have
`been found to range from 30 to 200 MHz. These
`processes include wafer cleaning, chemical vapor
`deposition and plasma etching. The frequency that
`is selected is dependent on which of these pro(cid:173)
`cesses is being utilized which in turn determines
`the required choice of plasma density and
`ion
`bombardment energy.
`In the case of a nonreactive etch process, the
`lower frequency limit is controlled by the maximum
`self bias voltage that can be used without damag(cid:173)
`ing the integrated circuit under fabrication The up(cid:173)
`per frequency limit is controlled by the minimum
`self bias voltage (about 150 volts for a nonreactive
`etch process and 50 volts for a reactive ion etch
`process) that produces sufficient energy to etch the
`wafer. As a practical matter, when this etch process
`is used in a serial wafer fabrication system, this
`upper limit is further reduced by the requirement
`that such etching be achievable within a period that
`is short enough that this etching step does not
`create a bottleneck to fabrication throughput. This
`range of frequencies has required modification of
`the match network that prevents reflections of rf
`power at the transition from the 50 ohm char(cid:173)
`acteristic impedance of the rf transmission line to
`the much lower impedance of the plasma reactor
`chamber. The plasma is generated by detuning the
`35 match network to make the powered electrode
`function as an igniter and then is tuned to reduce
`the self-bias voltage to a level appropriate for etch(cid:173)
`ing wafers without damage to the wafers.
`In the case of plasma wafer cleaning, the fre-
`quency is chosen to produce a high current density
`at voltages that do not etch the wafer or implant
`ions into the wafer. In the case of plasma enhanced
`chemical vapor deposition, the bombardment volt(cid:173)
`age and current should be compatible with good
`deposition uniformity, high film purity and the ap-
`propriate level of film stress.
`Figure 1 illustrates the structure of a typical
`plasma reactor.
`Figure 2 illustrates a match network suitable for
`coupling rf power at frequencies significantly
`above 13.56 MHz to a plasma reactor.
`Figure 3 is a flow diagram of a process utilizing
`the plasma reactor and match network of figures
`1 and 2, respectively.
`In the figures, the first digit of a reference
`numeral will indicate the first figure which is pre(cid:173)
`sented the element indicated by that reference
`numeral.
`
`40
`
`45
`
`so
`
`55
`
`4
`
`Page 4 of 11
`
`

`

`7
`
`EP 0 421 430 A2
`
`8
`
`pressure should be on the order of 4 mTorr. A
`reactive ion etch normally employs fluorine-contain(cid:173)
`ing or chlorine-containing gases. For example, the
`reactive ion etch containing 10 mole percent Nf3
`or 5 mole percent BCb, the power should be on
`the order of 10-50 Watts and the pressure should
`be on the order of 10-40 mTorr. •
`For a cleaning process, the pressure is typi(cid:173)
`cally selected in the range from 1 to 40 milliTorr
`and the self-bias voltage is selected in the range
`from 5 to 300 volts. Preferably, the pressure is on
`the order of 5 milliTorr and the self-bias voltage is
`on the order of 15 volts. To achieve these param(cid:173)
`eter values, the frequency should be selected in
`the range from 100 to 200 MHz. Particularly useful
`gases for wafer cleaning are pure argon, hydrogen
`and gas mixtures that include a fluorine-containing
`gas.
`The frequency can also be selected to op-
`timize various plasma enhanced chemical vapor
`deposition processes. For example, for that of sili(cid:173)
`con dioxide, the total process pressure can range
`from 0.5 to 20 milliTorr. The optimum pressure is
`on the order of 5 milliTorr. The self-bias voltage is
`typically in the range from 1 O to 400 volts and is
`preferrably selected to be on the order of 150 volts.
`To achieve these parameter values, the frequency
`should be selected in the range from 100 to 200
`MHz. Particularly useful gases
`for plasma en-
`hanced chemical vapor deposition are argon, silane
`and TEOS.
`A pair of electromagnetic coils 114 and 115
`and associated power supply 116 are included to
`produce a weak magnetic field that deflects plasma
`ions away from the walls of the plasma reactor.
`This is important to avoid contamination of the
`wafer during processing. Unlike in the prior art, it is
`not necessary that these fields be uniform at the
`surface of the wafer because they are too weak (on
`the order of 1-20 Gauss at the surface of the wafer)
`to significantly affect process uniformity. However,
`this range of magnetic field is sufficient to prevent
`plasma ions from impacting the walls with sufficient
`energy to desorb contaminants from those walls.
`A match network is used to couple power from
`the 50 ohm impedance rt power line to the much
`lower impedance plasma without producing a sig(cid:173)
`nificant amount of reflected power at the match
`network. For the frequencies significantly above
`13.56 MHz (i.e., on the order of or greater than 40
`MHz}, the conventional match network design can·
`not be used.
`
`The fundamental nonreactive etch prior to met(cid:173)
`al 2 deposition typically is executed at an etch rate
`the order of 250 Angstroms per minute
`on
`(equivalent silicon dioxide etch rate) in order to
`complete this etch step within about 40 seconds.
`At this rate, this etch step duration plus system
`overhead to transfer wafers into and out of the
`reactor meets a system throughput requirement of
`60 wafers per hour. Many IC circuit designs today
`contain layers that can be damaged by bombard(cid:173)
`ment by high energy ions. To avoid such damage
`while retaining an etch time on the order of 40
`seconds, the plasma is generated by an rt field of
`frequency higher than the 13.56 ISM (industry,
`scientific, medical} frequency that is conventionally
`utilized.
`Because it is important to maintain system
`throughput, as the frequency was varied in these
`tests, the power was adjusted to achieve a 250
`Angstroms per minute equivalent silicon dioxide
`etch rate For such etch rate, the negative self bias
`voltage was measured to be just over 500 volts for
`a 40 MHz frequency and was measured to be
`approximately 310 volts for a 60 MHz frequency.
`This confirms that soft etches (i.e., etches with self
`bias on the order of or less than 500 volts) with
`acceptable throughput can be produced at these
`frequencies. The self-bias voltage for comparable
`powers at 137 MHz is -125 volts. Therefore, it
`appears that a useful range of frequencies for
`achieving a soft etch that etches the wafer without
`damaging thin layers extends from 30 MHz to 200
`MHz. Frequencies above 137 MHz are particularly
`useful for wafer cleaning and plasma enhanced
`chemical vapor deposition. The preferred choice of
`frequency is in the range 50-70 MHz because this
`produces the required etch rate under very soft
`conditions (self-bias near -300 V). For a frequency f
`in the range 13.56 MHz < f < 200 MHz and an rf
`power that produces a 250 Angstroms per minute
`equivalent silicon dioxide etch rate, the etch uni(cid:173)
`formity is comparable to the uniformity exhibited
`by conventional 13.56 MHz nonmagnetized pro(cid:173)
`cesses. For a nonreactive etch, the gas pressure is
`selected in the range from 1 to 20 milliTorr.
`A soft etch process that uses high frequency rf
`power is useful in both nonreactive, nonselective
`etch processes and in reactive ion etch processes.
`The power is generally higher and the pressure is
`generally lower for the nonreactive ion processes.
`For example, for an etch with argon ions, the power
`should be on the order of 300 Watts and the
`
`•1 Torr = t.333 mbar.
`== 0.00133 mbar.
`1 mTorr
`
`• 1 ft = .305 meters.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`5
`
`Page 5 of 11
`
`

`

`9
`
`EP 0 421 430 A2
`
`10
`
`At rf frequencies, the wavelength of the signals
`becomes small enough that phase variation of sig·
`nals over the lengths of cables can produce signifi·
`cant interference effects. In this frequency range,
`cables should be substantially equal to an integral
`number of quarter wavelengths. In particular, cable
`111 from rf power supply 15 to match network 112
`and cable 113 from match network 112 to powered
`electrode 16 should each be substantially equal to
`an
`integral number of quarter wavelengths. By
`"substantially equal to" is meant that this length is
`equal to an integral number of quarter wavelengths
`plus or minus 0.05 quarter wavelength. This re(cid:173)
`quirement is easily met at 13.56 MHz where a
`quarter wavelength is on the order of 15 feet, * so a
`small cutting error of the length of such cable will
`not be significant. However, at 60 MHz a quarter
`wavelength is about 3 feet so that cable length
`errors are proportionately 5 times as significant.
`The addition of a single extra connector or circuit
`element can violate this cable length criterion
`In addition, at these frequencies, the discrete
`components, such as interdigitated blade capaci(cid:173)
`tors and multiple coil
`inductors, conventionally
`used in the match network for a 13.56 MHz plasma
`apparatus are unsuitable for use at the higher fre·
`quencies. The inductances of such discrete com(cid:173)
`ponents are too large for frequencies on the order
`of or greater than 40 MHz. In the chosen range of
`frequencies, an inductor can be a single strip of
`conductor. Likewise, the multiblade interdigitated
`blade capacitors of 13.56 MHz systems are re(cid:173)
`placed by a simple pair of parallel conductive
`plates spaced by a nonconductor such as a teflon
`sheet.
`Figure 2 illustrates a match network design that
`can be used at frequencies above 40 MHz. A
`ground 20 is connected to the outer conductor of a
`located in a wall 22 of match
`first rf connector 21
`network 112. A conductor 23 electrically connects
`the inner conductor of connector 21 to a first plate
`24 of an input capacitor 27. This capacitor also
`contains a second plate 26 and a dielectric spacer
`25. Plate 26 is electrically connected to a first plate
`28 of a shunt capacitor 211 that also contains a
`dielectric spacer 29 and a second plate 210. Plate
`28 is also connected to a first plate 212 of a third
`capacitor 215, that also includes a dielectric spacer
`213 and a second plate 214. Plate 214 connects
`through an inductor 216 to rf electrode 16.
`To permit tuning of this match network at a
`given frequency in the range 40-100 MHz, capaci(cid:173)
`tors 27 and 211 are variable capacitors. In this
`embodiment, these capacitances are varied by
`variation of the. spacing between plates 24 and 26
`and between the spacing between plates 28 and
`21 O. Variation of these spacings is achieved by
`means of a motor 221 connected by a rotary-to-
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`linear-displacement coupling 222 and a motor 223
`connected by a rotary-to-linear-displacement cou(cid:173)
`pling 224. An automated control circuit 225 auto·
`matically adjusts these two capacitances to mini-
`5 mize the amount of power reflected at rf coupler
`21. To enable such adjustment, a detector 226,
`connected between rf power supply 15 and rf con(cid:173)
`nector 21 provides to control circuit 225 information
`about the relative phase between the current and
`voltage components of the rf power input; and the
`ratio of the magnitudes of the current and voltage
`components of the rf power input signal. Control
`circuit 225 is a conventional feedback control cir(cid:173)
`cuit that adjusts the plate spacings of capacitors 27
`and 211 until the relative phase and ratio of mag(cid:173)
`nitudes of
`the
`rf current and voltage signals
`reaches preset values that are selected to produce
`substantially zero reflection of power back toward
`the rf power source. Typically, for a tuned match
`network, this system will produce less than 10
`Watts of reflected power from a 300 Watt input
`signal.
`For operation over the range of rf frequencies
`from 40-100 MHz, components 27, 211, 215 and
`216 should have the values 10-100 pf, 50-400 pf,
`100 pf and 0.5 /.LH, respectively.
`The variable control of the capacitors enables
`electrode 16 to function as an igniter electrode to
`generate a plasma as well as the powered elec-
`trode to maintain the plasma. When it is utilized as
`the igniter electrode, the feedback control of ca(cid:173)
`pacitors 27 and 211
`is
`inactivated and
`these
`capacitances are set respectively to 100 pf and
`400 pf. This produces at electrode 16 an electric
`field strength which is sufficiently large to produce
`a cascade of electrons that ignites the plasma.
`After ignition and tuning, the self-bias voltage on
`the powered electrode is on the order of -300 volts
`for 300 Watts of power at 60 MHz.
`Because this plasma apparatus can be op·
`erated over a range of frequencies, the chosen
`frequency will not in general be one of the ISM
`(industrial, scientific, medical) frequencies. There·
`fore, rf gasketing is used in all vacuum flanges of
`reactor 10, no windows into chamber 12 are al(cid:173)
`lowed, and all elongated openings in the chamber
`are eliminated or shielded so that rf radiation from
`reactor 10 is eliminated to an extent that reduces rf
`emissions below the United States governmentally
`allowed level of 15 /.L Vim at a distance of 300 m
`from the apparatus. This avoids interference with
`TV and other rf communication near such reactors.
`Although tests have indicated that a faster etch
`without significant damage to the wafer is achieved
`at 60 MHz than at 40 MHz, the frequency of 40.68
`MHz is an attractive choice because it is an ISM
`standard frequency with reduced radiation limits.
`Harmonics of this frequency are still a problem, but
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`6
`
`Page 6 of 11
`
`

`

`11
`
`EP 0 421 430 A2
`
`12
`
`the power in these harmonics is generally substan(cid:173)
`tially less than at the fundamental.
`
`Claims
`
`1. A plasma process method comprising the steps
`of:
`
`(a) igniting a plasma within a reactor chamber in
`a plasma reactor.
`(b) maintaining within said reactor chamber a
`gas pressure in the range 0.5 • 30 milliTorr • ;
`and
`(c) providing rf power to a powered electrode at
`which a wafer is placed for processing within the
`reactor chamber, said power being supplied at a
`power level P sufficient to maintain a plasma
`within the reactor chamber and at a frequency f
`> 13.56 MHz that is selected to optimize pro·
`cessing of the wafer.
`2. A method as in claim 1 wherein the frequency f
`is in the range 30·200 MHz.
`3. A method as in claim 1 or 2 wherein the fre(cid:173)
`quency f is in the range 50-70 MHz, whereby this
`method is particularly suitable for a soft plasma
`etch process.
`4. A method as in claim 1 or 2 wherein the fre(cid:173)
`quency f is greater than 137 MHz, whereby this
`method is particularly suitable for plasma cleaning
`and plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition.
`5. A method as in one of claims 1 to 3 wherein, in
`step (b), the power P and frequency f are selected
`to produce a powered electrode negative self-bias
`that is less than 350 volts, whereby this method is
`particularly suitable for a soft plasma etch process.
`6. A method as in claim 5 wherein the power and
`frequency are selected to produce at the powered
`electrode a negative self-bias voltage greater than
`150 volts, whereby this method is particularly suit·
`able for a nonreactive soft etch process.
`7. A method as in claim 5 wherein the power and
`frequency are selected to produce at the powered
`electrode a negative self-bias voltage greater than
`50 volts, whereby this method is particularly suit·
`able for a soft reactive ion etch process.
`8. A method as in one of claims 1 to 7, wherein in
`step (a}, rf power is supplied to said power elec(cid:173)
`trode through a match network that is detuned to
`produce a sufficiently

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket