T rials(2auspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 7
`Entered: October 24, 2017
`
`{?JNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`LEMAIRE ILLUMINATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR20 17-01700 (Patent 6,095,661 )
`Case IPR20 17-01 744 (Patent 6,488,390 B 1 )
`Case IPR2017-01806 (Patent 9,119,266 Bl)1
`
`Before ALEX S. YAP, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Denying Without Prejudice Motions to Terrninate the Proceedings
`35 US.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`' This Order addresses issues pertaining to all three cases. Therefore, a
`single Order is issued to be filed in each case. The parties are not authorized
`to use this style heading for any subsequent papers.
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 7
`Entered: October 24, 2017
`
`{?JNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`LEMAIRE ILLUMINATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR20 17-01700 (Patent 6,095,661 )
`Case IPR20 17-01 744 (Patent 6,488,390 B 1 )
`Case IPR2017-01806 (Patent 9,119,266 Bl)1
`
`Before ALEX S. YAP, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Denying Without Prejudice Motions to Terrninate the Proceedings
`35 US.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`' This Order addresses issues pertaining to all three cases. Therefore, a
`single Order is issued to be filed in each case. The parties are not authorized
`to use this style heading for any subsequent papers.
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`
`IPR20 17-01700 (Patent 6,095,661 )
`IPR20 17-01 744 (Patent 6,488,390 B 1 )
`IPR2017-01806 (Patent 9,119,266 Bl)
`
`On October 19, 2017, the parties filed joint motions to terminate
`
`IPR20 17-01700, IPR?20 17-01744, and IPR20 17-01806 (collectively, "these
`proceedings") under 35 U.S.C. § 31 7(a). (IPR2017-01700, Paper 7;
`IPR2017-01 744, Paper 8; IPR2017-01806, Paper 6). The arguments made
`by the parties and the factual circumstances of each case are similar. For
`
`purposes of this Order, this Order treats the joint motion to terminate (Paper
`7) in Case IPR20 17-01700 as representative, and specifically discuss the
`circumstances of that motion." The present Order, however, applies equally
`to each of the three motions to terminate. For the reasons stated below,
`
`parties' motions to terminate these proceedings are denied without prejudice.
`The parties are reminded that the Board is not a party to the
`settlement, and may independently identify any question of patentability. 37
`C.F.R § 42.74(a). Generally, however, the Board expects that a proceeding
`will terminate after the filing of a settlement agreement. See, e. g., Office
`Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48768 (Aug. 14, 2012). The rule
`
`governing settlement indicates that any agreement between the parties made
`in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of a proceeding
`shall be in writing and filed with the Board. 3 7 C.F.R. §§ 42.2 (defining the
`term "Proceeding"); 42.74. The parties assert that they sought authorization
`for the filing of the joint motion to terminate this proceeding, but
`
`acknowledge that no authorization was received prior to the filings. Paper 7
`("Mot."), 3; Ex. 1022.3
`
`2 Unless otherwise specified, this Order refers to papers and exhibits filed in
`Case IPR2017-01700.
`3 The panel has not yet received the e-mail requesting authorization to file
`the motions to terminate (Exhibit 1022).
`2
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`
`IPR20 17-01700 (Patent 6,095,661 )
`IPR20 17-01 744 (Patent 6,488,390 B 1 )
`IPR2017-01806 (Patent 9,119,266 Bl)
`
`Each of the joint motions to terminate must be accompanied by a tme
`copy of the parties' settlement agreement, as required by 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.74(b). With respect to having the settlement agreement treated as
`business confidential under 3 7 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), the parties must file the
`confidential settlement electronically in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`End to End (PTAB E2E) as an exhibit in accordance with the instThcti:
`provided on the '?s website (uploading as "Parties and Board Only"). '
`Inthiscase,theparties s no s
`a emen
`
`//
`
`agreement. Moreover, the parties did not identify the status of related
`
`actions sufficiently, and only state that the parties have settled the cases and
`
`that the two related District Court cases were dismissed on October 18,
`
`2017. Mot. 2-3 . The parties do not state whether any litigation or
`
`proceeding involving the subject patents is contemplated in the foreseeable
`
`future or whether any collateral agreements or understandings were made in
`
`connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of these
`
`proceedings.
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that the joint motions to terminate the proceedings are
`
`denied without prejudice;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are authorized to file corrected
`
`joint motions to terminate the proceedings within seven days of this
`
`ORDER:
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the corrected joint motions to terminate
`
`the proceedings must be accompanied by a fully executed, true copy of the
`
`3
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01700 (Patent 6,095,661)
`IPR20 17-01 744 (Patent 6,488,390 B 1 )
`IPR2017-01806 (Patent 9,119,266 Bl)
`
`parties' settlement agreement, filed electronically in PTAB E2E as an (2)
`
`exhibit;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties may request, in the joint
`
`r?
`
`motions to terminate, that the exhibit that is the settlement agreement be
`r
`treated as business confidential information, to be kept separate from the
`
`@
`
`patent file, as specified in 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(?c);
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the corrected joint motions to terminate
`
`the proceedings should update the Board concerning the status of any
`
`litigation or proceeding, including, but not limited to, proceedings in the
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, involving the subject patents, and advise
`
`the Board whether any litigation or proceeding involving the subject patents
`
`G)
`
`is contemplated in the foreseeable future; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the corrected joint motions to terminate=9
`
`the proceedings should include a statement certifying that there are no
`
`collateral agreements or understandings made in connection with, or in
`
`contemplation of, the termination of the inter partes review.
`
`4
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`
`IPR20 17-01700 (Patent 6,095,661 )
`IPR20l7-01744 (Patent 6,488,390 Bl)
`IPR2017-01806 (Patent 9,119,266 Bl)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`David Makous
`dmakous@lhlaw.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Eduardo Drake
`eduardo@fantasticipconsulting.com
`
`Jonathan Rixen
`jrixen@lemairepatent. com
`
`s
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
