Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 4126
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`ALACRITECH, INC.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Case No. 2:16-cv-693-JRG-RSP
`
`v.
`
`LEAD CASE
`
`CENTURYLINK COMMUNICATIONS
`LLC, et al.
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`ALACRITECH, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`WINSTRON CORPORATION, et al.,
`
`
`
`ALACRITECH, INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`v.
`
`DELL INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`INTEL CORPORATION,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Intervenor.
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:16-cv-692-JRG-RSP
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`MEMBER CASE
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:16-cv-695-RWS-RSP
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`MEMBER CASE
`
`
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`PURSUANT TO PATENT RULE 4-3
`
`
`
`1
`
`06973-00001/8978191.1
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.001
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134 Filed 02/21/17 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 4127
`
`Pursuant to Patent Rule 4-3 and the Court’s Docket Control Order, Plaintiff Alacritech,
`
`Inc. (“Alacritech”) and Intervenor and Defendants (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby submit
`
`this Joint Claim Construction Statement.
`
`A.
`
`CONSTRUCTION OF THOSE CLAIM TERMS, PHRASES, OR CLAUSES
`ON WHICH THE PARTIES AGREE
`
`The parties do not presently agree on the constructions of any terms.
`
`B.
`
`EACH PARTY’S PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF EACH DISPUTED
`CLAIM TERM, PHRASE, OR CLAUSE, TOGETHER WITH AN
`IDENTIFICATION OF INTRINSIC AND OTHER EVIDENCE
`
`Exhibits A and B, attached hereto, identify the disputed claim terms. Exhibit A contains
`
`Alacritech’s proposed constructions for each disputed claim term and intrinsic and other
`
`evidence in support; Exhibit B contains Defendants’ proposed constructions for each disputed
`
`claim term and intrinsic and other evidence in support.
`
`C.
`
`THE ANTICIPATED LENGTH OF TIME NECESSARY FOR THE
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING
`
`The parties anticipate that two hours per side will be sufficient time to present the parties’
`
`respective positions.
`
`D.
`
`POSSIBLE WITNESSES AT THE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING
`
`The parties do not presently intend to call any witnesses at the Claim Construction
`
`Hearing.
`
`E.
`
`OTHER ISSUES WHICH MIGHT APPROPRIATELY BE TAKEN UP AT
`A PREHEARING CONFERENCE PRIOR TO THE CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTION HEARING
`
`The parties are not aware of any other issues that should be taken up at a pre-hearing
`
`conference before the Claim Construction Hearing.
`
`
`
`
`
`06973-00001/8978191.1
`
`2
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.002
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134 Filed 02/21/17 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 4128
`
`Dated: February 21, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`
`/s/ Joseph M. Paunovich_______________
`
`Claude M. Stern
`California State Bar No. 96737
`claudestern@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Telephone: (650) 801-5000
`Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
`
`Joseph M. Paunovich
`joepaunovich@quinnemanuel.com
`California State Bar No. 228222
`Jordan Brock Kaericher
`California State Bar No. 265953
`jordankaericher@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Telephone: (213) 443-3000
`Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
`
`T. John Ward, Jr.
`Texas State Bar No. 00794818
`jw@wsfirm.com
`Claire Abernathy Henry
`Texas State Bar No. 24053063
`claire@wsfirm.com
`WARD & SMITH LAW FIRM
`1507 Bill Owens Parkway
`Longview, Texas 75604
`Telephone: (903) 757-6400
`Facsimile: (903) 757-2323
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`ALACRITECH, INC.
`
`
`
`WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP
`
`
`/s/ Garland T. Stephens
`
`Garland T. Stephens, Lead Attorney (24053910)
`Douglas W. McClellan (24027488)
`Melissa L. Hotze (24049831)
`Justin L. Constant (24067551)
`Richard D. Eiszner (65891)
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`700 Louisiana, Suite 1700
`Houston, TX 77002
`Telephone: (713) 546-5000
`Facsimile: (713) 224-9511
`garland.stephens@weil.com
`doug.mcclellan@weil.com
`melissa.hotze@weil.com
`justin.constant@weil.com
`richard.eiszner@weil.com
`
`Anne Marie Cappella (181402)
`Jeremy Jason Lang (255642)
`Amanda K. Branch (300860)
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`201 Redwood Shores Parkway
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Telephone: (650) 802-3000
`Facsimile: (650) 802-3100
`anne.cappella@weil.com
`jason.lang@weil.com
`amanda.branch@weil.com
`
`William Sutton Ansley (80085)
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`1300 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 682-7000
`Facsimile: (202) 857-0940
`sutton.ansley@weil.com
`
`David Mitchell DesRosier (676024)
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`100 Federal Street, 34th Floor
`Boston, MA 02110
`
`06973-00001/8978191.1
`
`3
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.003
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134 Filed 02/21/17 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 4129
`
`Telephone: (617) 772-8300
`Facsimile: (617) 772-8333
`david.desrosier@weil.com
`
`Harry L. Gillam, Jr. (07921800)
`Gillam & Smith LLP
`303 S. Washington Ave.
`Marshall, TX 75670
`Telephone: (903) 934-8450
`Facsimile: (903) 934-9257
`gil@GillamSmithLaw.com
`
`
`David Folsom (07210800)
`Jackson Walker L.L.P.
`6002 Summerfield Dr., Suite B
`Texarkana, TX 75503
`Telephone: (903) 255-3250
`Facsimile: (903) 255-3265
`dfolsom@jw.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR INTERVENOR
`INTEL CORPORATION
`
`/s/ Frank V. Pietrantonio
`Deron R. Dacus
`Texas Bar No. 00790553
`THE DACUS FIRM, P.C.
`821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430
`Tyler, TX 75701
`Tel: (903) 705-1117
`Fax: (903) 705-1117
`ddacus@dacusfirm.com
`
`Jonathan G. Graves (VA Bar 46136)
`Frank V. Pietrantonio (VA Bar 25473)
`Stephen C. Crenshaw (VA Bar 82016)
`COOLEY LLP
`One Freedom Square
`Reston Town Center
`11951 Freedom Drive
`Reston, VA 20190-5656
`Telephone: (703) 456-800
`Fax: (703) 456-8100
`
`06973-00001/8978191.1
`
`4
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.004
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134 Filed 02/21/17 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 4130
`
`jgraves@cooley.com
`fpietrantonio@cooley.com
`screnshaw@cooley.com
`
`Phillip E. Morton (DC Bar 1032243)
`COOLEY LLP
`1299 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
`Suite 700
`Washington, DC 20004-2400
`Telephone: (202) 842-7800
`Fax: (202) 842-7899
`pmorton@cooley.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS TIER 3,
`INC., SAVVIS COMMUNICATIONS CORP.,
`AND CENTURYLINK COMMUNICATIONS
`LLC
`
`/s/ Michael J. Newton
`Michael J. Newton (TX Bar No. 24003844)
`Brady Cox (TX Bar No. 24074084)
`ALSTON & BIRD, LLP
`2828 North Harwood Street, 18th Floor
`Dallas, Texas 75201-2139
`Tel: (214) 922-3400
`Fax: (214) 922-3899
`mike.newton@alston.com
`brady.cox@alston.com
`
`Deron R. Dacus (TX Bar No. 00790553)
`THE DACUS FIRM, PC
`821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430
`Tyler, Texas 75701
`(903) 705-1117
`(903) 581-2543 Fax
`ddacus@dacusfirm.com
`
`Kirk T. Bradley (NC Bar No. 26490)
`ALSTON & BIRD, LLP
`Bank of America Plaza
`101 South Tryon Street, Suite 4000
`Charlotte, NC 28280-4000
`Tel: (704) 444-1000
`Fax: (704) 444-1111
`
`06973-00001/8978191.1
`
`5
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.005
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134 Filed 02/21/17 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 4131
`
`
`
`kirk.bradley@alston.com
`
`Lindsey Yeargin (GA Bar No. 248608)
`Emily Chambers Welch (GA Bar No. 606071)
`ALSTON & BIRD, LLP
`One Atlantic Center
`1201 West Peachtree St NW #4900
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Tel: 404-881-7000
`Fax: 404-881-7777
`lindsey.yeargin@alston.com
`emily.welch@alston.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT DELL INC.
`
`/s/Harold H. Davis, Jr.
`Ravi S. Deol
`State Bar No. 24090073
` ravi.deol@klgates.com
`K&L GATES LLP
`1717 Main St.
`Suite 2800
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`214.939.5500
`214.939.5849 Facsimile
`
`Harold H. Davis, Jr., Lead Counsel
`California Bar No. 235552 (admitted in E.D. Tex.)
` harold.davis@klgates.com
`Howard Chen
`Texas Bar No. 24009953
`Rachel Burnim
`California Bar No. 292952 (admitted in E.D. Tex.)
`K&L GATES LLP
`Four Embarcadero, Suite 1200
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415.882.8200
`Facsimile: 415.882.8220
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS WISTRON
`CORP., WIWYNN CORP., AND SMS
`INFOCOMM CORP.
`
`
`
`
`06973-00001/8978191.1
`
`6
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.006
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134 Filed 02/21/17 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 4132
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
`
`document has been served on February 21, 2017, to all counsel of record who are deemed to
`
`have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).
`
`
`
` /s/ Antonio Sistos
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`06973-00001/8978191.1
`
`7
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.007
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 23 PageID #:
` 4133
`
`Exhibit A
`Alacritech’s Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`EJO 2HFIA@ +=E +IJHK?JE 6AHI
`Claim Term
`Proposed Construction(s)
`Fast-path: “the protocol stack of the
`1. “fast-path processing”
`host computer performs little or no
`/ “slow-path processing”
`network layer or transport layer
`processing”
`
`---------------------------------
`
`Slow-path: No construction necessary
`
`
`
`“data regarding an active connection”
`
`2. “context [for
`communication]”
`
`
`06973-00001/8977889.2
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`‘205 Patent at Abstract
`‘205 Patent at 3:48-51
`‘205 Patent at 3:63 through 4:4
`‘205 Patent at 8:8-40
`‘205 Patent at 8:41-60
`‘205 Patent at 11:18-30
`‘205 Patent at 15:51-55
`‘205 Patent at 17:6-34
`‘205 Patent at 18:16-37
`‘205 Patent at 21:45-50
`‘205 Patent at 24:45-50
`‘205 Patent at 39:35-45
`‘205 Patent Claim 1
`‘205 Patent Claim 8
`‘205 Patent Claim 31
`‘205 File History, 4/18/2006
`Amendment at ALA00014037,
`ALA00014043
`‘036 Patent at 39:10-20
`‘036 Patent at 39:45-48
`‘241 File History, 10/04/2006
`Amendment at ALA00015142
`‘809 Provisional at 7-8
`‘809 Provisional at 13
`
`‘036 Patent Claim 1
`‘036 Patent Claim 6
`‘036 Patent Claim 7
`
`- 1 -
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`Context: the set of circumstances or
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.008
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 2 of 23 PageID #:
` 4134
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim Term
`
`Proposed Construction(s)
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`‘036 Patent at 7:62 through 8:2
`‘036 Patent at 8:25-30
`‘036 Patent at 10:10-22
`‘036 Patent at 15:22-27
`‘036 Patent at 37:63 through 38:10
`‘036 Patent at 39:33-40
`‘036 Patent at 39:45-48
`‘036 Patent at Fig. 2
`‘036 Patent at Fig. 4B
`‘072 Patent Claim 7
`‘072 Patent Claim 15
`‘072 Patent Claim 21
`‘036 File History, 03/28/2006
`Amendment at ALA00014675,
`ALA00014686
`‘036 File History, 10/10/2006
`Amendment at ALA00014513,
`ALA00014514
`‘241 File History, 10/04/2006
`Amendment at ALA00015142
`‘809 Provisional at 4-6
`
`‘880 Patent Claim 1
`‘880 Patent Claim 9
`‘880 Patent Claim 10
`‘880 Patent Claim 12
`‘880 Patent Claim 13
`‘880 Patent Claim 22
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`facts that surround a particular event,
`situation, etc.1
`
`Context: the circumstances in which
`an event occurs.2
`
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`02/11/2011 Boucher Tr. (Patent
`Interference No. 105,775), 63:23-
`65:17.
`
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.009
`
`3. “flow key”
`
`“an identifier for a connection”
`
`
`
`
`1 Random House Webster’s College Dictionary, 2nd ed. (1999).
`
`2 The American Heritage Dictionary, 3rd ed. (1994).
`
`06973-00001/8977889.2
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 3 of 23 PageID #:
` 4135
`
`Claim Term
`
`Proposed Construction(s)
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`2/10/2011 Boucher Dep. Tr. 99:13-
`20.
`
`Key: In databases, a unique value
`that is used to identify a data record.
`Synonymous with primary key.3
`
`Key: In database management, an
`identifier for a record or group of
`records in a datafile.4
`
`Key: a group of characters that
`identifies a record in a database or
`other computer file.5
`
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`‘880 Patent Claim 23
`‘880 Patent Claim 31
`‘880 Patent Claim 32
`‘880 Patent Claim 35
`‘880 Patent Claim 36
`‘880 Patent Claim 42
`‘880 Patent Claim 48
`‘880 Patent Claim 52
`‘880 Patent Claim 56
`‘880 Patent Claim 58
`‘880 Patent Claim 59
`‘880 Patent at 7:15-28
`‘880 Patent at 7:47-60
`‘880 Patent at 11:66 through 12:13
`‘880 Patent at 13:29-48
`‘880 Patent at 18:15-26
`‘880 Patent at 36:38-46
`‘880 Patent at 37:66 through 38:21
`‘880 Patent at 59:27-33
`‘880 Patent at 60:19-35
`‘880 Patent at 61:56 through 62:2
`‘880 Patent at 64:4-18
`‘880 File History, 6/19/2003 Request to
`Provoke Interference at
`ALA07368392, ALA07368395,
`ALA07368397, ALA07368401,
`ALA07368412, ALA07368414
`
`
`3 Webster’s New World Dictionary of Computer Terms, 8th ed. (2000).
`
`4 Microsoft Computer Dictionary, 4th ed. (1999).
`
`5 Random House Webster’s College Dictionary, 2nd ed. (1999).
`
`06973-00001/8977889.2
`
`- 3 -
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.010
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 4 of 23 PageID #:
` 4136
`
`Claim Term
`
`Proposed Construction(s)
`
`4. “database” / “flow
`database”
`
`
`“collection of organized data”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`‘880 File History, 6/14/2010
`Amendment at ALA00016718
`‘880 Patent Claim 43
`‘880 Patent at 36:38-42
`‘880 Patent at 64:4-18
`‘880 File History, 6/19/2003 Request to
`Provoke Interference at
`ALA07368397, ALA07368408,
`ALA07368412, ALA07368415
`‘880 File History, 6/14/2010
`Amendment at ALA00016722
`
`
`6 Random House Webster’s College Dictionary, 2nd ed. (1999).
`
`7 Webster’s New World Dictionary of Computer Terms, 8th ed. (2000).
`
`06973-00001/8977889.2
`
`- 4 -
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`Database: A collection of organized,
`related data, esp. one in electronic
`form that can be accessed and
`manipulated by specialized computer
`software.6
`
`Database: A collection of related
`information about a subject
`organized in a useful manner that
`provides a base or foundation for
`procedures, such as retrieving
`information, drawing conclusions,
`and making decisions. Any
`collection of information that servers
`these purposes qualifies as a
`database, even if the information
`isn’t stored on a computer. In fact,
`important predecessors of today’s
`sophisticated business database
`systems were files kept on index
`cards and stored in file cabinets.
`Information usually is divided into
`data records, each with one or more
`data fields.7
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.011
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 5 of 23 PageID #:
` 4137
`
`Claim Term
`
`Proposed Construction(s)
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`“a single contiguous block or several
`associated blocks of memory in the
`computer”
`
`5. “a destination [] in the
`memory of the
`computer” / “a
`destination memory;” /
`“a destination in
`memory;” / “a
`destination . . . on the
`host computer system”
`
`
`
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`Destination: 1. the place to which a
`person or thing travels or is sent. 2.
`The purpose for which something is
`destined.8
`
`Destination: The record, file,
`document, or disk to which
`information is copied or moved, as
`opposed to the source.9
`
`Destination: The location (drive,
`folder, or directory) to which a file is
`copied or moved. Compare source
`(definition 1).10
`
`
`‘699 Patent Claim 1
`‘699 Patent Claim 2
`‘699 Patent Claim 7
`‘699 Patent Claim 13
`‘699 Patent Claim 19
`‘699 Patent Claim 20
`‘699 Patent at Abstract
`‘699 Patent at 2:44-60
`‘699 Patent at 2:67 through 3:11
`‘699 Patent at 5:36 through 6:8
`‘699 Patent at 6:60-7:2
`‘699 Patent at Figs. 2 and 3
`‘241 Patent Claim 1
`‘241 Patent Claim 3
`‘241 Patent Claim 22
`‘241 Patent Claim 23
`‘205 Patent Claim 1
`‘205 Patent Claim 6
`‘205 Patent Claim 8
`‘205 Patent at 43:4-18
`‘809 Provisional at 1-3
`
`
`
`
`8 Random House Webster’s College Dictionary, 2nd ed. (1999)
`
`9 Webster’s New World Dictionary of Computer Terms, 8th ed. (2000)
`
`10 Microsoft Computer Dictionary, 4th ed. (1999)
`
`06973-00001/8977889.2
`
`- 5 -
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.012
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 6 of 23 PageID #:
` 4138
`
`6AHI 2HFIA@ *O 2=EJEBB
`Claim Term
`Proposed Construction(s)
`6. “operation code”
`“status data”
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`Word: The native unit of storage on
`a particular machine. A word is the
`largest amount of data that can be
`handled by the microprocessor in one
`operation and is also, as a rule, the
`width of the main data bus. Word
`sizes of 16 bits and 32 bits are the
`most common.11
`
`Word: A unit of information
`composed of characters, bits, or bytes
`that’s treated as an entity and that can
`be stored in one location.12
`
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’880 Patent Claim 1
`‘880 Patent Claim 13
`‘880 Patent Claim 17
`‘880 Patent Claim 32
`‘880 Patent Claim 34
`‘880 Patent Claim 46
`‘880 Patent Claim 51
`‘880 Patent Claim 52
`‘880 Patent Claim 56
`‘880 Patent at 7:47-60
`‘880 Patent at 53:63 through 54:6
`‘880 Patent at 63:28 through 64:18
`‘880 Patent File History, 6/19/2003
`Request to Provoke Interference
`at ALA07368393,
`ALA07368397, ALA07368406,
`ALA07368411, ALA07368415
`‘880 Patent File History, 6/14/2010
`Amendment at ALA00016214,
`ALA00016218
`‘880 Patent File History, 11/1/2010
`Amendment at ALA00016880,
`ALA00016884
`
`
`
`
`11 Microsoft Computer Dictionary, 4th ed. (1999).
`
`12 Webster’s New World Dictionary of Computer Terms, 8th ed. (2000)
`
`06973-00001/8977889.2
`
`- 6 -
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.013
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 7 of 23 PageID #:
` 4139
`
`6AHI 2HFIA@ *O ,ABA@=JI
`Claim Term
`Proposed Construction(s)
`7. “prepending” /
`No construction necessary
`“prepended”
`
`
`8. “status information”
`
`
`
`No construction necessary
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`‘036 Patent Claim 4
`‘072 Patent Claim 1
`‘072 Patent Claim 9
`‘072 Patent Claim 15
`‘104 Patent Claim 1
`‘104 Patent Claim 22
`‘241 Patent Claim 7
`‘241 Patent Claim 9
`‘241 Patent Claim 12
`‘241 Patent Claim 17
`‘241 Patent Claim 18
`‘036 Patent at 14:5-12
`‘036 Patent at 4:14-18
`‘036 Patent at 4:28-33
`‘036 Patent at 4:39-46
`’036 Patent at 8:8-14
`‘036 Patent at 11:10-16
`‘036 Patent at 11:36-42
`‘036 Patent at 29:61-64
`‘036 Patent at 39:21-27
`‘036 Patent at Fig. 5
`‘241 File History, 4/19/2007
`Amendment at ALA00015063-
`064, ALA00015071
`‘072 Patent Claim 2
`‘072 Patent Claim 3
`‘072 Patent Claim 9
`‘072 Patent Claim 10
`‘072 Patent Claim 14
`‘072 Patent Claim 15
`
`06973-00001/8977889.2
`
`- 7 -
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.014
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 8 of 23 PageID #:
` 4140
`
`Claim Term
`
`Proposed Construction(s)
`
`No construction necessary
`
`9. “substantially no
`network layer or
`transport layer
`processing” /
`“significant network
`layer or significant
`transport layer
`processing”
`
`
`10. “substantially
`contiguous manner”
`
`
`11. “without an interrupt
`dividing”
`
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`‘072 Patent Claim 17
`‘072 Patent Claim 21
`‘072 Patent at 11:18-33
`‘072 Patent at 13:51 through 14:10
`‘072 Patent at 27:24-30
`‘072 Patent at 30:14-16
`‘072 Patent at 63:59-67
`‘072 Patent at 64:21-38
`
`‘205 Patent Claim 22
`‘205 Patent Claim 31
`‘205 Patent at Abstract
`‘205 Patent at 4:48-50
`‘205 Patent at 39:35-45
`‘205 Patent at 43:13-17
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`
`No construction necessary
`
`‘205 Patent Claim 6
`‘205 Patent at 42:30-47
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`
`No construction necessary.13
`
`‘241 Patent Claim 1
`‘241 Patent Claim 2
`‘241 Patent Claim 17
`‘241 Patent Claim 18
`‘241 Patent Claim 22
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`Interrupt: A hardware or software
`signal that temporarily stops program
`execution in a computer so that
`
`
`13 Should Defendants seek unnecessary judicial review of the term, Plaintiff reserves the right to rely on the provided extrinsic evidence.
`
`06973-00001/8977889.2
`
`- 8 -
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.015
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 9 of 23 PageID #:
` 4141
`
`Claim Term
`
`Proposed Construction(s)
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`‘241 Patent at 4:20-33
`‘241 Patent at 5:24-28
`‘241 Patent at 11:34-46
`‘241 Patent at 14:9-33
`‘241 Patent at 14:64 through 16:1
`‘241 Patent at 16:19-22
`‘241 Patent at 34:60 through 35:1
`‘241 Patent at 36:24-54
`‘241 Patent at 37:16-32
`‘241 Patent at 41:27-40
`
`
`14 Random House Webster’s College Dictionary, 2nd ed. (1999)
`
`15 Webster’s New World Dictionary of Computer Terms, 8th ed. (2000)
`
`06973-00001/8977889.2
`
`- 9 -
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`another procedure can be carried
`out.14
`
`Interrupt: A signal to the
`microprocessor indicating that an
`event has occurred that requires its
`attention. Processing is halted
`momentarily so that input/output or
`other operations can take place.
`When the operation is finished,
`processing resumes.15
`
`Interrupt: A signal from a device to
`a computer’s processor requesting
`attention from the processor. When
`the processor receives an interrupt, it
`suspends its current operations, saves
`the status of its work, and transfers
`control to a special routine known as
`an interrupt handler, which contains
`the instructions for dealing with the
`particular situation that caused the
`interrupt. Interrupts can be generated
`by various hardware devices to
`request service or report problems, or
`by the processor itself in response to
`program errors or requests for
`operating-system services. Interrupts
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.016
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 10 of 23 PageID #:
` 4142
`
`Claim Term
`
`Proposed Construction(s)
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`12. “re-assembly buffer”
`
`
`No construction necessary
`
`13. “Flow re-assembler”
`
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`‘880 Patent Claim 1
`‘880 Patent Claim 18
`‘880 Patent Claim 32
`‘880 Patent Claim 56
`‘880 Patent Claim 57
`‘880 Patent at 22:57 through 23:4
`‘880 Patent at 29:35-48
`
`
`‘880 Patent Claim 41
`‘880 Patent at 11:66 through 12:13
`‘880 Patent at 13:13-28
`‘880 Patent at 13:29-48
`‘880 Patent at 13:49-51
`‘880 Patent at 14:4-9
`‘880 Patent at 18:15-26
`‘880 Patent at 33:64-34:9
`‘880 File History, 11/1/2010
`
`
`16 Microsoft Computer Dictionary, 4th ed. (1999)
`
`06973-00001/8977889.2
`
`- 10 -
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`are the processor’s way of
`communicating with the other
`elements that make up a computer
`system. A hierarchy of interrupt
`priorities determines which interrupt
`request will be handled first if more
`than one request is made. A program
`can temporarily disable some
`interrupts if it needs the full attention
`of the processor to complete a
`particular task.16
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.017
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 11 of 23 PageID #:
` 4143
`
`Claim Term
`
`Proposed Construction(s)
`
`14. “packet batching
`module”
`
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`
`15. “traffic classifier”
`
`
`No construction necessary.17
`
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`Amendment at ALA07367744
`‘880 File History, 6/14/2010 at
`ALA07367903
`‘880 File History, 6/19/2003 Request to
`Provoke Interference at
`ALA07368408, ALA07368415-
`16
`‘880 Patent Claim 41
`‘880 Patent Claim 54
`‘880 Patent Claim 60
`‘880 Patent at 64:4-18
`‘880 Patent at Fig. 50
`‘880 Patent at 5:48-63
`‘880 Patent at 36:38-46
`‘880 Patent at 37:66 through 38:21
`‘880 Patent at 59:27-33
`‘880 Patent at 60:19-35
`‘880 Patent at 61:56 through 62:2
`‘880 File History, 6/19/2003 Request to
`Provoke Interference at
`ALA07368408
`
`
`‘880 Patent Claim 41
`‘880 Patent Claim 42
`‘880 Patent at 59:27-33
`‘880 Patent at 63:25-63
`‘880 File History, 6/19/2003 Request to
`Provoke Interference at
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`Traffic: The messages sent and
`received over a communication
`channel.18
`
`
`
`17 Should Defendants seek unnecessary judicial review of the term, Plaintiff reserves the right to rely on the provided extrinsic evidence.
`
`18 Modern Dictionary of Electronics, 6th ed. (1997).
`
`06973-00001/8977889.2
`
`- 11 -
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.018
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 12 of 23 PageID #:
` 4144
`
`Claim Term
`
`Proposed Construction(s)
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`ALA07368407
`‘880 File History, 11/1/2010
`Amendment at ALA07367744
`
`
`19 Newton’s Telecom Dictionary, 16th ed. (2000).
`
`20 IEEE Standard Glossary of Computer Networking Terminology (1995).
`
`06973-00001/8977889.2
`
`- 12 -
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Traffic: Bellcore’s definition: A flow
`of attempts, calls, and messages. My
`definition: The amount of activity
`during a given period of time over a
`circuit, line or group of lines, or the
`number of messages handled by a
`communications switch. There are
`many measures of “traffic.”
`Typically it’s so many minutes of
`voice conversation, or so many bits
`of data conversation. Note that
`Bellcore includes attempts in its
`definition of traffic. I don't. The
`decision is yours. But you should be
`aware of what you include in your
`calculations.19
`
`Traffic: Messages that are
`transmitted and received over a
`communication channel.20
`
`Prioritization of Network Traffic
`Prioritization can be explained as
`follows: implement some method to
`get important packets through a
`network when the network is
`congested and delay unimportant
`packets until later. Important packets
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.019
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 13 of 23 PageID #:
` 4145
`
`Claim Term
`
`Proposed Construction(s)
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`16. “flow database
`manager”
`
`
`
`No construction necessary [beyond
`proposal for “database”]22
`
`
`‘880 Patent Claim 42
`‘880 Patent Claim 56
`‘880 Patent at 59:11-12
`‘880 Patent at 59:54-58
`‘880 Patent at 64:29-35
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`are generally classified as delay-
`sensitive traffic such as that generated
`by live videoconferencing, voice
`calls, mission-critical transaction
`processing, remote monitoring, and
`collaborative computing (in which
`people work in real time on their
`computer screens across networks).
`Unimportant packets may include
`packets carrying electronic mail or
`packets downloaded from Internet
`Web sites by freeloading users.21
`
`See also Gupta, Sanjay et al., Traffic
`classification and scheduling in ATM
`networks (1993).
`
`See also Kubbar, Osama et al.,
`Traffic Classification and Resource
`Allocation in ATM Networks (1996)
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`Database: A collection of organized,
`related data, esp. one in electronic
`form that can be accessed and
`
`
`21 Encyclopedia of Networking (1998).
`
`22 Should Defendants seek unnecessary judicial review of the term, Plaintiff reserves the right to rely on the provided extrinsic evidence.
`
`06973-00001/8977889.2
`
`- 13 -
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.020
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 14 of 23 PageID #:
` 4146
`
`Claim Term
`
`Proposed Construction(s)
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`‘880 Patent at 68:25-29
`‘880 File History, 6/19/2003 Request to
`Provoke Interference at
`ALA07368408
`
`
`23 Random House Webster’s College Dictionary, 2nd ed. (1999).
`
`24 Webster’s New World Dictionary of Computer Terms, 8th ed. (2000).
`
`25 Webster’s New World Dictionary of Computer Terms, 8th ed. (2000).
`
`06973-00001/8977889.2
`
`- 14 -
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`manipulated by specialized computer
`software.23
`
`Database: A collection of related
`information about a subject organized
`in a useful manner that provides a
`base or foundation for procedures,
`such as retrieving information,
`drawing conclusions, and making
`decisions. Any collection of
`information that servers these
`purposes qualifies as a database, even
`if the information isn’t stored on a
`computer. In fact, important
`predecessors of today’s sophisticated
`business database systems were files
`kept on index cards and stored in file
`cabinets. Information usually is
`divided into data records, each with
`one or more data fields.24
`
`Database management: Tasks
`related to creating, maintaining,
`organizing, and retrieving
`information from a database. See
`data manipulation.25
`
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.021
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 15 of 23 PageID #:
` 4147
`
`Claim Term
`
`Proposed Construction(s)
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`17. “flow manager”
`
`
`No construction necessary.26
`
`‘880 Patent Claim 43
`‘880 Patent Claim 46
`‘880 Patent Claim 49
`‘880 Patent at 11:66 through 12:13
`‘880 Patent at 18:15-26
`‘880 Patent at 59:27-33
`‘880 Patent at 63:47-64
`‘880 Patent at 87:60-65
`‘880 File History, 6/19/2003 Request to
`Provoke Interference at
`ALA07368409, ALA07368411,
`ALA07368412
`
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`Traffic: The messages sent and
`received over a communication
`channel.27
`
`Traffic: Bellcore’s definition: A flow
`of attempts, calls, and messages. My
`definition: The amount of activity
`during a given period of time over a
`circuit, line or group of lines, or the
`number of messages handled by a
`communications switch. There are
`many measures of “traffic.”
`Typically it’s so many minutes of
`voice conversation, or so many bits
`of data conversation. Note that
`Bellcore includes attempts in its
`definition of traffic. I don't. The
`decision is yours. But you should be
`aware of what you include in your
`calculations.28
`
`
`26 Should Defendants seek unnecessary judicial review of the term, Plaintiff reserves the right to rely on the provided extrinsic evidence.
`
`27 Modern Dictionary of Electronics, 6th ed. (1997).
`
`28 Newton’s Telecom Dictionary, 16th ed. (2000).
`
`06973-00001/8977889.2
`
`- 15 -
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.022
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 16 of 23 PageID #:
` 4148
`
`Claim Term
`
`Proposed Construction(s)
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`
`Traffic: Messages that are
`transmitted and received over a
`communication channel.29
`
`Prioritization of Network Traffic
`Prioritization can be explained as
`follows: implement some method to
`get important packets through a
`network when the network is
`congested and delay unimportant
`packets until later. Important packets
`are generally classified as delay-
`sensitive traffic such as that generated
`by live videoconferencing, voice
`calls, mission-critical transaction
`processing, remote monitoring, and
`collaborative computing (in which
`people work in real time on their
`computer screens across networks).
`Unimportant packets may include
`packets carrying electronic mail or
`packets downloaded from Internet
`Web sites by freeloading users.30
`
`See also Gupta, Sanjay et al., Traffic
`classification and scheduling in ATM
`networks (1993).
`
`INTEL Ex.1039.023
`
`
`29 IEEE Standard Glossary of Computer Networking Terminology (1995).
`
`30 Encyclopedia of Networking (1998).
`
`06973-00001/8977889.2
`
`- 16 -
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00693-JRG-RSP Document 134-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 17 of 23 PageID #:
` 4149
`
`Claim Term
`
`Proposed Construction(s)
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`18. “re-assembler”
`
`
`No construction necessary.
`
`19. “means for
`receiving, by the
`network interface device
`from the computer, a
`command to transmit
`data from the computer
`to the network”
`
`
`20. “means for sending,
`by the network interface
`
`No construction necessary
`
`
`Not subject to 112(6)
`
`
`To the extent the Court determines
`otherwise,
`
`
`Function: Receiving a command to
`transmit data from the computer to the
`network
`
`
`Structures: a network interface
`device, a register on the network
`interface device, and equivalents
`thereof.
`
`No construction necessary
`
`
`
`See also Kubbar, Osama et al.,
`Traffic Classification and Resource
`Allocation in ATM Networks (1996)
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`Expert testimony of Dr. Paul Min
`
`‘880 Patent Claim 43
`‘880 Patent at 6:58 through 7:7
`‘880 Patent at 13:49-56
`‘88