throbber

`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NETAPP, INC. and RACKSPACE US, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`REALTIME DATA LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2017-01660
`Patent No. 7,161,506
`____________________
`
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDING
`PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 317 AND 37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74, Petitioner Rackspace
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01660
`MOTION TO TERMINATE
`
`
`
`US, Inc. and Patent Owner Realtime Data LLC (“the Parties”) jointly request that
`
`this proceeding be terminated with respect to Rackspace. Petitioner NetApp Inc.
`
`consents to and does not oppose termination of Rackspace from this proceeding.
`
`This motion was authorized by e-mail from the Board on July 31, 2017.
`
`I.
`
`Termination is Appropriate
`Patent Owner and Rackspace have reached a settlement of their disputes
`
`concerning the subject patent. Accordingly, the Parties jointly request termination
`
`of these proceedings with respect to Rackspace. Because there is a remaining
`
`Petitioner party, this proceeding will continue without Rackspace. As a result,
`
`terminating the proceeding as to Rackspace will not change the Board’s ability to
`
`review the subject patent.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74, a copy of the settlement agreement (Ex.
`
`2002) between Realtime and Rackspace, and a request that the settlement
`
`agreement be treated as business confidential information, are filed concurrently
`
`with this motion.1
`
`
`1 The settlement agreement has been filed electronically via E2E for “Board
`
`Only” to preserve confidentiality from the other parties.
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`

`In addition, the status of the related district court litigations and IPRs for the
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01660
`MOTION TO TERMINATE
`
`
`
`patents at issue in the litigations are summarized below.
`
`II. The Parties Have Resolved All Related Cases Involving Rackspace
`The Parties have resolved the disputes related to the 7 inter partes review
`
`proceedings in which they are currently involved:
`
`Case Number
`
`Petitioners
`
`Patent Owner U.S. Patent Number
`
`IPR2017-01354 NetApp and Rackspace Realtime
`
`9,054,728
`
`IPR2017-01627 Rackspace
`
`IPR2017-01629 Rackspace
`
`Realtime
`
`Realtime
`
`7,415,530
`
`9,116,908
`
`IPR2017-01660 NetApp and Rackspace Realtime
`
`7,161,506
`
`IPR2017-01663 NetApp and Rackspace Realtime
`
`7,378,992
`
`IPR2017-01664 NetApp and Rackspace Realtime
`
`8,643,513
`
`IPR2017-01691 Rackspace
`
`Realtime
`
`7,358,867
`
`The Parties will file motions to end proceedings before institution decision
`
`or terminate Rackspace as a party to the petition as appropriate in each of those
`
`proceedings.
`
`The Parties have also resolved the issues in the pending district court suit
`
`between Realtime and Rackspace, Realtime Data LLC v. Rackspace Us, Inc. et al,
`
`E.D. Tex., 6:16-CV-961 (concerning U.S. Patent Nos. 7,161,506; 7,358,867;
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`
`7,378,992; 7,415,530; 8,643,513; 9,054,728; and 9,116,908). The Parties have
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01660
`MOTION TO TERMINATE
`
`filed, and the District Court has granted, dismissal of Rackspace. See id. at Dkt.
`
`No. 215 (Aug. 1, 2017) (granting partial dismissal of Rackspace).2
`
`III. Other Related Proceedings
`The Parties provide the following list of other related AIA trial and litigation
`
`proceedings not involving Rackspace, including an identification of the parties
`
`involved and the current status of those proceedings.
`
`Inter Partes Review
`A.
`The ’506 patent is also undergoing inter partes review in:
`
`• IPR2017-00176. The petitioners in this proceeding are Dell Inc.;
`
`EMC Corp.; Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Co.; HP Enterprise Services,
`
`LLC. The Board instituted review on May 30, 2017.
`
`• IPR2017-00806. The petitioner in this proceeding is Teradata
`
`Operations, Inc. Patent Owner filed its preliminary response on May
`
`22, 2017.
`
`
`2 This case includes other defendants, and it will proceed as to those
`
`defendants.
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01660
`MOTION TO TERMINATE
`
`• IPR2017-01688. The petitioner in this proceeding is Veritas
`
`Technologies, Inc. The Board has not yet issued an institution
`
`decision.
`
`B. District Court Litigation
`The Parties provide the following status and party information regarding the
`
`district court cases where Patent Owner is currently asserting the ’506 Patent:
`
`• Realtime Data LLC v. Hewlett Packard Enter. Co. et al, E.D. Tex.,
`
`Case No. 6:16-CV-00086. The remaining parties in this case are
`
`Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Co. and HP Enterprise Services, LLC.
`
`The Court has stayed proceedings pending resolution of inter partes
`
`review. See Dkt. No. 89.
`
`• Realtime Data LLC v. Savvis Commc’ns Corp. et al, E.D. Tex., Case
`
`No. 6:16-CV-00087. The remaining parties in this case are Savvis
`
`Communications Corp. and Veritas Technologies LLC. The Court has
`
`stayed proceedings pending resolution of inter partes review. See Dkt.
`
`No. 106.
`
`• Realtime Data LLC v. Dell Inc. et al, E.D. Tex., Case No. 6:16-CV-
`
`00089. The remaining parties in this case are Dell, Inc. and EMC
`
`Corp. The Court has stayed proceedings pending resolution of inter
`
`- 4 -
`
`

`

`
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01660
`MOTION TO TERMINATE
`
`partes review. See Dkt. No. 113 (granting stay as to Dell) and Dkt.
`
`No. 117 (granting stay as to EMC).
`
`• Realtime Data LLC v. Teradata Operations., Inc., C.D. Cal., Case
`
`No. 2:16-CV-02743. The remaining party in this case is Teradata
`
`Operations, Inc. The Court has stayed proceedings pending resolution
`
`of inter partes review. See Dkt. No. 53.
`
`• Realtime Data LLC v. Fujitsu America, Inc. et al, N.D. Cal., Case
`
`No. 3:17-cv-02109. The parties remaining in this case are Fujitsu
`
`America, Inc. and Quantum Corp. The Court has stayed proceedings
`
`pending resolution of inter partes review. See Dkt. No. 63.
`
`• Realtime Data LLC v. Silver Peak Sys., Inc, N.D. Cal., Case No.
`
`4:17-CV-02373. The party remaining in this case is Silver Peak
`
`Systems, Inc. The Court has stayed proceedings pending resolution of
`
`inter partes review. See Dkt. No. 101.
`
`
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner and Patent Owner jointly request that
`
`the Board terminate this proceeding in its entirety.
`
`
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`

`

`
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01660
`MOTION TO TERMINATE
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ William P. Rothwell
`
`William P. Rothwell, Reg. No. 72,522
`NOROOZI PC
`2245 Texas Drive, Suite 300
`Sugar Land, TX 77479
`
`Kayvan B. Noroozi, Pro Hac Vice Pending
`NOROOZI PC
`1299 Ocean Ave., Suite 450
`Santa Monica, CA 90401
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` / David L. McCombs/
`David McCombs
`Counsel for Petitioner Rackspace US, Inc.
`Registration No. 32,271
`
`Diek O. Van Nort, Reg. No. 60,777
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`370 Seventeenth Street, Suite 4200
`Denver, CO 80202
`
`Jonathan Bockman, Reg. No. 45,640
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`1650 Tysons Boulevard
`McLean, VA 22102
`
`David L. McCombs, Reg. No. 32,271
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`2323 Victory Ave. Suite 700
`Dallas, TX 75219
`
`Kyle Howard, Reg. No. 67,568
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`
`- 6 -
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2017-01660
`MOTION TO TERMINATE
`
`2323 Victory Ave. Suite 700
`Dallas, TX 75219
`
`Greg Webb, Reg. No. 59,859
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`2323 Victory Ave. Suite 700
`Dallas, TX 75219
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: August 7, 2017
`
`
`- 7 -
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2017-01660
`MOTION TO TERMINATE
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing JOINT MOTION TO
`
`TERMINATE PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 317 AND 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.74 was served electronically via e-mail on August 7, 2017, on the
`
`following counsel of record for Petitioner:
`
`Diek O. Van Nort (Lead Counsel)
`Jonathan Bockman (Back-up Counsel)
`Kyle Howard (Back-up Counsel)
`David McCombs (Back-up Counsel)
`Greg Webb (Back-up Counsel)
`
`
`
`kyle.howard.ipr@haynesboone.com
`david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`greg.webb.ipr@haynesboone.com
`35667-506-IPR@mofo.com
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ William P. Rothwell
`
`William P. Rothwell, Reg. No. 72,522
`NOROOZI PC
`2245 Texas Drive, Suite 300
`Sugar Land, TX 77479
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Date: August 7, 2017
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket