throbber
Haemodynamics 3
`
`Method: Eight infants with a median age of 6 months (range 3 days–
`8 months) undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB for congenital heart disease
`with increased pulmonary flow and/or increased pulmonary vascular resist-
`ance were included in this case-control-study. After weaning off CPB,
`infants with mean pulmonary artery pressure ⬎15 mmHg received inhaled
`iloprost (2.5 ␮g kg⫺1 over 15 min) using an ultrasonic nebulizer (Optineb®,
`Nebu-Tec, Elsenfeld, Germany). Mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP)
`and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured and the ratio MPAP/MAP
`was calculated before and 30 min and 60 min after starting iloprost inhala-
`tion. The need of vasoactive drugs after weaning off CPB was analysed.
`Repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey test was used to compare
`MPAP/MAP. P ⬍ 0.05 was considered significant.
`Results: Mean MPAP/MAP decreased after
`from
`iloprost
`inhaled
`0.64 ⫾ 0.1 to 0.5 ⫾ 0.1 at 30 min and 0.47 ⫾ 0.1 at 60 min, respectively
`(P ⬍ 0.05). To keep MAP ⬎45 mmHg a norepinephrine infusion was neces-
`sary in one patient. The individual courses of MPAP/MAP are demonstrated
`in the figure.
`
`12345678
`
`mean
`
`*
`
`*
`
`* ⫽ p ⬍ 0.05 vs. before iloprost
`
`before
`iloprost
`
`iloprost ⫹
`30 min
`
`iloprost ⫹
`60 min
`
`1.0
`
`0.8
`
`0.6
`
`0.4
`
`0.2
`0.1
`
`0.0
`
`MPAP/MAP
`
`Discussion: A single dose inhaled iloprost decreases MPAP/MAP in infants
`after weaning off CPB by 21% and 25% after 30 min and 60 min, respec-
`tively. This indicates selective pulmonary vasodilating effects. However,
`vasopressor support was necessary in one infant. Although inhaled nitric
`oxide (iNO) is widely used to decrease pulmonary vascular resistance in
`infants undergoing cardiac surgery, the effects of iNO varies among patients,
`rebound phenomena have been described, and cumbersome devices are
`necessary to administer iNO safely. Inhaled iloprost may therefore be an
`alternative for selective pulmonary vasodilatation in infants undergoing car-
`diac surgery because it is effective, easy to use and long acting. Furthermore,
`from the economic point of view, inhaled iloprost may be attractive because
`iNO became very expensive after FDA approval.
`References:
`1 Celermajer DS, Culen S, Deanfield JE, et al. Impairment of endothelium-dependent
`pulmonary artery relaxation in children with congenital heart disease and abnormal
`pulmonary hemodynamics. Circulation 1993; 87: 440–446.
`2 Olschewski H, Simonneau G, Galie N, et al. Inhaled iloprost for severe pulmonary
`hypertension. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 322–329.
`
`036
`Incentive spirometry for preoperative preparation
`of cardiac patients
`A.E. Balandiuk, I.A. Kozlov
`Research Institute of Transplantology and Artificial Organs,
`Moscow, Russia
`Introduction: Arterial hypoxaemia is not a rare complication of CABG.
`Incentive spirometry (IS) is a simple and low cost training method, which
`encourages an increase of lung volumes and inspiratory capacity. The purpose
`of the study was to investigate the efficiency of preoperative IS in CABG
`patients [1].
`Method: The study included 65 randomly selected CABG patients 41 to 73
`years of age. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients of group S (37)
`used IS before surgery, group C (28 patients) were controls. IS was adminis-
`tered to group S patients for 2 days before surgery. Spirometry training was
`performed for 10 min each hour. Further, we started IS training at the second
`postoperative day. Anaesthesia and ventilation parameters were the same in
`both groups. Oxygenation index PaO2/FiO2, difference and Qs/Qt were
`observed at the following operation stages: before sternotomy (1), 10 min
`
`References:
`1
`Zacharias A, Habib RH. Factors predisposing to median sternotomy complications.
`Deep vs. superficial infection. Chest, 1996; 110: 1173–1178.
`2 Muller M, Schmid R, Georgopoulos A, et al. Application of microdialysis to clinical
`pharmacokinetics in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1995; 57(4): 371–380.
`3 Wysocki M, Delatour F, Faurisson F, et al. Continuous versus intermittent infusion of
`vancomycin in severe staphylococcal infections: prospective multicenter randomized
`study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001; 45: 2460–2467.
`
`112
`The effects of levosimendan in cardiac surgery patients
`C. Romana, J. Kokotsakis1, M. Argyriou1, C. Soutzopoulou,
`P. Stratigopoulou, E. Karamichali
`Departments of Anaesthesiology and 1Cardiac Surgery, Evangelismos
`General Hospital, Athens, Greece
`Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of levosi-
`mendan, a new calcium sensitizer, used during cardiac surgery to facilitate
`separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) [1].
`Method: Twenty ASA II–III patients, undergoing elective CABG, received,
`after the aortic clamp release, the same loading dose of levosimendan of
`24 ␮g kg⫺1 over 10 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1 ␮g kg⫺1
`min⫺1 (group I, n ⫽ 10) or 0.2 ␮g kg⫺1 min⫺1 (group II, n ⫽ 10). All patients
`had measured ejection fraction ⬎25%, sinus rhythm, cardiac index
`(CI) ⬎1.8 L min⫺1m⫺2, mean arterial pressure (MAP) ⬎60 mmHg and pul-
`monary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) 8–20 mmHg. They all received the
`same anaesthetic scheme. Cardiac output (CO) was obtained by Swan-
`Ganz catheter and thermodilution (Baxter-Edwards Lab). Haemodynamic
`measurements: Heart Rate (HR), MAP, PCWP, CO, CI, stroke volume (SV),
`systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were performed at: T0: baseline, T1 at
`15 min after infusion, T2 at 60 min, T3 after 12 h and T4 at 24 h after the end of
`infusion. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA for repeated mea-
`surements, P ⬍ 0.05 was considered significant.
`Results: There were no significant differences in the demographic data.
`Haemodynamic results are shown in the table.
`
`Heart rate
`(beats/min)
`Mean arterial
`pressure (mmHg)
`Stroke volume (ml)
`
`Cardiac index
`(L min⫺1 m2)
`PCWP (mmHg)
`
`Gp
`I
`II
`I
`II
`I
`II
`I
`II
`I
`II
`
`T1
`T0
`78 ⫾ 1.8
`80 ⫾ 2
`89* ⫾ 2.0
`80 ⫾ 3
`76 ⫾ 3.8
`85 ⫾ 4
`65* ⫾ 5
`82 ⫾ 5
`57 ⫾ 4.2
`55 ⫾ 4
`59 ⫾ 7.1
`56 ⫾ 5.6
`2 ⫾ 0.6
`1.9 ⫾ 0.3
`1.9 ⫾ 0.6 2.2 ⫾ 0.7
`18 ⫾ 4
`12* ⫾ 3
`16 ⫾ 3
`11* ⫾ 2.5
`
`T4
`T3
`T2
`81 ⫾ 3
`84 ⫾ 3.2
`84 ⫾ 3
`88 ⫾ 3.8
`94* ⫾ 4
`93* ⫾ 4
`78 ⫾ 4.8
`78 ⫾ 5
`73 ⫾ 4
`74 ⫾ 3.2
`76 ⫾ 5
`73 ⫾ 5
`58 ⫾ 5.4
`60* ⫾ 5
`58 ⫾ 3.7
`59 ⫾ 7
`63* ⫾ 9.9
`60* ⫾ 8.5
`2.3* ⫾ 0.6 2.5* ⫾ 0.7 2.3* ⫾ 0.4
`2.4* ⫾ 0.7 2.6* ⫾ 0.8 2.3* ⫾ 0.8
`13* ⫾ 5
`13 * ⫾ 6
`12* ⫾ 4
`12* ⫾ 4
`12* ⫾ 5
`10* ⫾ 5
`
`*P ⬍ 0.05 in comparison to T0
`
`Conclusion: Both doses of levosimendan were effective, achieving a suc-
`cessful separation from CPB during the initial attempt. Levosimendan may
`offer an alternative inotropic therapy in patients following cardiac surgery.
`The effects of the drug were not abolished after terminating the infusion [2].
`References:
`1
`Follath F, Cleland JG, Just H, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous levosimendan
`compared with dobutamine in severe low-output heart failure (the LIDO study): a ran-
`domised double-blind trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 196–202.
`Lilleberg J, Nieminen MS, Akkila J, et al. Effects of a new calcium sensitizer, levosi-
`mendan, on haemodynamics, coronary blood flow and myocardial substrate utilization
`early after coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 660–668.
`
`2
`
`084
`Inhaled iloprost in the management of pulmonary
`hypertension in infants undergoing congenital
`heart surgery
`M. Mueller, C. Neuhaeuser, R. Noest, H. Akintuerk, I. Welters,
`G. Hempelmann
`Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Pain Therapy, University
`Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany
`Introduction: Impaired endothelium-dependant pulmonary artery relaxation
`is present in children with high pulmonary flow and pressure which might be
`exacerbated by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) [1]. The use of aerosolized
`Iloprost has shown to be safe and effective in adults with pulmonary hyper-
`tension [2]. However, no data is available about the intra-operative use of
`inhaled iloprost in infants ⬍1 year with pulmonary hypertension undergoing
`cardiac surgery.
`
`© 2004 European Academy of Anaesthesiology, European Journal of Anaesthesiology 21 (Suppl. 33): 2–36
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , IPR2017-01622, Ex. 1041, p. 1 of 1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket