throbber
SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION
`
`This module reflects the initial scientific discussion for the approval of Ventavis. For
`information on changes after approval please refer to module 8.
`
`1.
`
`Introduction
`
`Ventavis contains iloprost, (ZK 36374; 5-{(E)—(IS, SS, 6R, 7R)—7—hydroxy—6-[(E)-(3S, 4RS)—3-
`hydroxy-4—methyl-1—octen-6—inyl]-bi-cyclo[3.3.0]octan—3-ylidene}pentanoic acid), a chemically stable
`synthetic analogue of prostacyclin PGIZ. There are 6 stereogenic centers in the molecule. Iloprost is an
`approximately equal mixture of two diastereoisomers with the 4-methy1 group the hydroxy methyl
`octenyi in either the R or the S position; the other 5 stereogenic centers are pure R or S.
`
`OH
`
`'dH
`
`is marketed under the trade name Ilomedine in several
`An intravenous formulation of iloprost
`European member states and was authorised through national procedures. The approved indications
`include the treatment of thromboangiitis obliterans with ulcers or rest pain, severe inoperable
`peripheral arterial occlusive disease stages III-IV, and severe Raynaud’s phenomenon.
`
`VENTAVIS 10 ug/ml nebuliser solution in ampoules containing 2 ml of solution (i.e. 20 u g iloprost) is
`intended for administration via the inhalation route with a nebuliser.
`
`Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) can occur without apparent cause (Primary Pulmonary
`Hypertension)(PPH) or be secondary to systemic disease, such as systemic sclerosis, CREST
`syndrome, mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), HIV infection or be induced by drugs/toxins.
`Pulmonary hypertension may also be caused by chronic thromboemboiic occlusions of the pulmonary
`arteries.
`
`The pathogenesis involves vasoconstriction, vascular remodelling, and thrombosis in situ resulting in a
`progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistances leading to increase pulmonary hypertension.
`Death is most closely associated with an increase in pulmonary artery pressure and right atrial pressure
`and a decrease in cardiac outth due to failure of the right side of the heart. Pulmonary hypertension is
`clinically defined as a mean pulmonary arterial pressure of more than 25 mini-lg at rest or 30 mmHg
`during exercise.
`
`The incidence of PPH amounts to 1 to 2 cases per million individuals per year. PPH and the following
`forms of SPH:
`connective tissue disease pulmonary hypertension, drug-induced pulmonary
`hypertension, portopulmonary hypertension, pulmonary hypertension associated with congenital heart
`disease and chrome thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension are estimated to "be affecting
`approximately 2.2 per 10,000 persons in the European Community.
`
`At the present time, the conventional therapy for patients with primary or secondary pulmonary
`arterial hypertension includes vasodilators,
`such as high doses of calcium—channel blockers,
`anticoagulants and oxygen. Epoprostenoi (prostacyclin) delivered via a portable pump system into an
`in dwelling central vein catheter has been shown to improve hemodynamic parameters and exercise
`capacity in patients with both PPH and secondary PAH (functional class 1H and IV), and it has been
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , IPR2017-01622, Ex. 1039, p. 1 of 30
`
`1130
`
`©EMEA 2004
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , IPR2017-01622, Ex. 1039, p. 1 of 30
`
`

`

`shown to improve survival in patients with severe conditions. Phannacological tolerance with need for
`dose increments during long—term treatment is commonly observed.
`
`The severity of pulmonary hypertension is classified according to the WHO functional assessment
`1998 WHO World Symposium (modified after the NYHA functional assessment). Functional class is
`a predictor of survival. Patients who are in functional class II and III have a mean survival of 3.5 years
`compared with a mean survival of 6 months for those who are in functional class IV.
`
`Ventavis is indicated for treatment of patients with PPH, classified as NYHA fimctional class III, to
`improve exercise capacity and symptoms.
`
`The recommended dose regimen of Ventavis is 2.5 micrograms or 5.0 micrograms of inhaled iloprost
`(as delivered at
`the mouthpiece of the nebuliser). The dose per inhalation session should be
`administered 6 to 9 times per day according to the individual need and tolerability. The duration of
`treatment depends on clinical status and is left to physician’s discretion. Ventavis should only be
`initiated and monitored by a physician experienced in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension.
`
`2.
`
`Part 11: Chemical, Pharmaceutical And Biological Aspects
`
`Composition
`
`' Ventavis is an aqueous, clear, sterile, ready to use nebuliser solution for inhalation. It is an isotonic
`solution in dilute ethanol with a pH close to 8.0. Ventavis contains lOpg/ml of the active substance,
`iloprost, (as trometamol salt). 2 ml of the solution are supplied in single glass (type I) ampoules of '
`3 ml.
`
`Active substance
`
`is a synthetic analogue of the natural prostacyclin PGI'; , IUPAC name: 5- {(13)—
`Iloprost (INN),
`(1 8,5 S,6R,7R)—7-Hydroxy—6-[(E)—(3 S,4RS)—3 -hydroxy-4—methyi— l -octen—6—ynyl] -bicyclo [3 .3.0}oct—3-
`ylidene}-pentanoic acid . Iloprost is an oily substance, very slightly soluble in water. Due to its chiral
`centers, iloprost is an optically active diastereoisomeric mixture which also exhibits geometric (—2— E—)
`isomerism.
`
`The synthesis of Iloprost can be divided into three parts:
`-
`(1) the manufacture of the basic backbone bicyclo—octane (BCO).
`—
`(2) Addition of the side chain.
`—
`(3) Modification of the side chains.
`
`Particular attention is paid to isomeric/stereocherrncal control and the process involves optical
`resolution by preparative I-LPLC on a chirally—modified substrate,
`in order
`to obtain desired
`enantiomers. Chromatography is necessary at a number of stages and relevant diastereoisomers are
`separated by HPLC during the process.
`
`Iloprost possesses 6 asymmetrical carbon atoms of which 5 are common with the those in the natural
`prostacyclin. The configuration of the molecule is (therefore namely 88, 98, liR, 128 and 153. The
`methyl group at (316 causes two isomers to occur: 16R and 16S. Consequently, iloprost consists of
`two optically active diastereoisomers. Iloprost also contains two defined configurations of carbon-
`carbon double bonds, 5E and 13E — this stereo—specific formation is common in prostaglandin
`chemistry.
`.
`-
`The separated methyl diastereoisorners E(l6S) and E(16R) —iloprost are obtained as crystals and the
`isomer ratio has been determined. This ratio is [45/55 ] of [E(16S) / E(16R)] and has been shown to be
`unchanged since the pre—clinical and clinical development program began. Moreover, it was shown
`that there was no significant difference in the pharmacokinetic parameters of the E (16R)-iloprost, E
`(168)-iloprost and diastereoisomer mixture. Further data (i.v. infusion in dogs) demonstrated that the
`diastereoisomers do not undergo inter—conversion in viva.
`
`2130
`
`©EMEA 2004
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , IPR2017-01622, Ex. 1039, p. 2 of 30
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , IPR2017-01622, Ex. 1039, p. 2 of 30
`
`

`

`The structure of Iloprost has been confirmed by IR, NMR, SM and X—ray spectroscopy as
`well as mechanistic arguments derived from the synthetic route. Solid state variables related
`to bioavailability are not relevant as the substance is administered in solution.
`
`Active substance specy’icaz‘ion
`
`The specification includes tests for identity, specific optical rotation, assay determination of identitifed
`and unidentified related substances by HPLC; Z- isomers are quantified separately. Levels of those
`related impurities, which are mentioned in the specification are qualified by animal toxicology studies.
`The isomer ratio E(16R):E(16S) is also checked.
`The level of residual solvents and catalysts are adequately discussed and are acceptable taking into
`account the small therapeutic quantities in which iloprost is administered. Batch analytical data
`indicate satisfactory compliance with the agreed specification and uniformity fiom batch to batch.
`
`Stability oftne active substance
`
`Prostaglandins in general are unstable substances. The stability of iloprost has been studied under
`forced degradation conditions, and for three batches, stability studies have been carried out in long
`term (at —18°C for three years) and under accelerated conditions (at +6°C I uncontrolled RH for 6
`months and at +25°C / 60% RH for lmonth). The samples used for long term and accelerated stability
`studies were stored in glass vials .
`
`These stressing conditions show that iloprost is sensitive to temperature, light and acid conditions as
`expected, and that the substance is not sensitive to alkalis and oxygen.
`ISB—Hydroxy-iloprost, 15—Oxo—iloprost, iloprost -ethyl~ and iloprost—isopropyl ester and the dimeric
`esters
`iloprost—1 l-iloprost
`ester and iloprost-IS-iloprost
`ester were identified as
`the main
`decomposition products.
`After 36 months storage at —18 °C the samples of iloprost show a time dependent tendency of a
`decrease of the content of iloprost accompanied by a minor increase of the main decomposition
`products iloprost -l l-iloprost ester and iloprost -15-iloprost ester. After longer storage periods, the
`decrease does not continue. Changes in other parameters such as appearance, isomer ratio E(4R)I'E(4S)
`and Z—isomers are not time—dependent .
`,
`At higher temperatures, +6 °C and +25 °C/6O % RH, iloprost decomposes significantly. The oily
`substance crystallizes and gets turbid, the amount of decomposition products increases, particularly
`the inner iloprost esters iloprost—1 l-iloprost ester and iloprost «ES-iloprost ester and the content of
`iloprost decreases, both below the specification limits. Isomer ratio and the amount of Z—isomer
`remain unchanged however.
`
`It is clear that iloprost is an unstable'substance and must be stored with care. A three years shelf— life
`with a re—test period of one year is acceptable when the active substance is stored sealed at w18° C and
`protected from light. (For stability of finished product: see below).
`
`Other ingredients
`
`The ingredients of the formulation are defined in the SPC. All are of PhEur standard and there are no
`significant risks in relation to TSE.
`
`Product development and finished product
`
`Product Development
`
`Development of the formulation is simple and is governed by the need to produce a sterile, isotonic
`solution suitable for nebulisation without the need for any extraneous excipients, which may have an
`adverse effect when given by the pulmonary route. The product can withstand terminal heat
`sterilisation.
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , IPR2017-01622, Ex. 1039, p. 3 of 30
`
`3/30
`
`©EMEA 2004
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , IPR2017-01622, Ex. 1039, p. 3 of 30
`
`

`

`In the overall development history, it should be noted that clinical trials were not performed with this
`product as intended for marketing. They were performed with solutions prepared from another,
`intravenous, product already—authorised, containing 20 ug iloprost / ml, diluted with isotonic saline
`(1:1) and nebulised for pulmonary administration The same amount of active substance would be
`administered in both cases; differences in safety profiles arising from different formulations and
`excipients used were regarded as not significant.
`
`Use with inhalation devices
`
`inhalation
`In vitro performance tests were performed with the product nebulised with different
`devices. The goal of those studies was to evaluate the performance characteristics of the different
`inhalation devices and to compare those with the device used in the clinical trials. On the basis of
`these investigations, relevant information has been included in the SPC to indicate which inhalation
`devices can be used since they met the experimental parameters.
`
`Manufacture ofthe Product
`
`In summary, the manufacturing process is: dissolution 'oftrometamol and sodium chloride in water for
`injection, a dissolution of Iloprost in ethanol and a mixing of the 2 phases, followed by a pH
`adjustment, a volume adjustment, and a filtration on a 0.22 pm filter. After filling of the solution, the
`ampoules are sealed and sterilized at 121°C for 20 min, and visually checked. Satisfactory in process
`controls are carried out: bulk pH, integrity of the filter membrane, yield, filled volume etc.
`
`Concerning the validation of the manufacturing process, the results are those of the validation of the
`intravenous solution, which is more concentrated. They indicate the good stability of the drug in
`ethanolic or unbuffered solution during 24 hours at room temperature. There are no adsorption losses
`of the drug during the process, and there is no significant degradation after one or two sterilisation
`cycles. The validation studies also Show that the bulk solution after filtration is essentially free of
`microorganisms prior to terminal sterilisation.
`
`Product Specification
`
`At release, the product is examined for appearance of the solution, pH value, extractable volume,
`identification of iloprost and trometamol, sterility. The assay of iloprost and determination of
`impurities are performed by validated HPLC methods.
`Batch analytical data show good product uniformity.
`Identical specifications are applied at release and end of shelfiife.
`The limits for degradation products are based on results generated in the stability studies.
`
`Stability of the product
`
`Stability studies have been carried out on three batches under ICH conditions. The batches meet the
`specification after 6 months' storage at + 40 °C/75% RH and after 18 months‘ storage at + 25 00"60%
`RH and 30 °C/70% RH.
`All three batches exhibit no significant changes on storage compared to the results at start.
`In general, the results support the shelf—life and storage conditions as defined in the SPC.
`
`I
`
`Discussion on chemicai, pharmaceutical and biological aspects
`
`The synthetic control and purity of iloprost active substance has been well-described, in particular the
`isomeric control during synthesis and general purity aspects as reflected in the active substance
`specification. As expected, this prostanoid is intrinsically unstable and must be stored fiozen at low
`temperature. Furthermore, the chosen manufacturing process and the specification for the finished
`product will allow a good quality of this medicinal product. Stability of the product has also been
`shown to be satisfactory when due allowance is made for the unstable nature of the active substance.
`The compatibility of this product with commercially—available nebulisation devices available in the
`EU is addressed in the Clinical section below and in the SPC.
`In general, the information provided in the Chemical and Pharmaceutical documentation suggests this
`is a product that should have satisfactory and uniform quality characteristics from batch to batch.
`4130
`
`©EMEA 20 O4
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , IPR2017-01622, Ex. 1039, p. 4 of 30
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , IPR2017-01622, Ex. 1039, p. 4 of 30
`
`

`

`At the time of the opinion, there was an unresolved minor pharmaceutical issue on the validation of
`the manufacturing process having no impact on the benefib’risk balance of the product. The applicant
`committed to resolve this by means of a post-opinion Follow—Up Measure within an agreed timeframe.
`
`3.
`
`Part III: Toxico-pharmacological aspects
`
`Pharmacodynamics
`
`In vitro Studies
`
`Iloprost is a raceme mixture of E-4R— and 1348- diastereoisomers; it binds with high affinity both to
`prostacyclin ([P—) receptors and to the EPl -subtype of prostaglandin B receptors. Binding of iloprost to
`IP-receptors activates adenylate cyclase and increases intracellular cyclic AMP concentration. This
`iloprost-induced rise of CAMP alters gene expression of IP-receptors.
`Human pulmonary vascuiar tissue was shown to respond to iloprost with vasorelaxation and this was
`also seen, but to a lesser extent, in human pulmonary artery preparations from patients with pulmonary
`hypertension, However,
`in isolated normoxic-perfused rat lung iloprost did not lower pulmonary
`artery pressure, but
`it potently inhibited hypoxia-induced vasoconstriction. These differences are
`presumably due to variations of the expression of functional IP—receptors.
`,
`In vitra, iloprost was shown to dilate blood vessels harm a number of species pre-contracted with a
`variety of vasoconstrictors (histamine, noradrenaline, angiotensine II). The E—4S-isomer of iloprost
`has a potency in vitro of approximately 3 times that of iloprost, whereas the E—4R—isomer is about 4
`times less potent than iloprost.
`_
`_
`Iloprost
`is a common pathway inhibitor of platelet activation, acting via binding to platelet IP-
`receptors and has been shown to inhibit aggregation in vitro of platelets from several species (human,
`dog, cat, rat, cattle and monkey), with IC5o concentrations ranging ficorn 0.06 rig/ml (1.6 x lO'loM in
`humans) to 4.3 ng/ml (1.2 x lO‘SM in monkeys) With regard to inhibition of platetet aggregation in
`human platelet—rich—plasma (PRP), iloprost has a potency of approximately twice that of prostacyclin
`and 17 times that ofPGE1. Similarly to the vascular effects, the E-4S—isomer is approximately 1.5 to 2
`times as potent as iloprost in inhibiting platelet aggregation and the EAR-isomer 4 to 7 times less
`potent.
`in vitra, iloprost was shown to reduce the LPS-induced upnregulation of pro—inflammatory
`Further,
`tumour necrosis factor and in human and animal monocytic ceIls and monocytic/macrophage cell
`lines.
`
`In vivo studies
`
`For technical reasons, most in viva data have been obtained using intravenous administration of
`iloprost. The summary of pharmacodynamic studies performed by the intravenous route in support of
`the Ilomedin application is presented. There are no phannacodynamic animal studies using inhaled
`iloprOst, since the intravenous and oral studies have demonstrated that its inhibitory action on platelet
`aggregation and vasodilatation is due to iloprost binding to the P612 receptors.
`The pharmacodynamic properties of iloprost are those expected for a prostacyclin analogue.
`Iloprost has shown vasodilatory effect on pulmonary and systemic blood vessels in various animal
`species, with variations presumably depending on the distribution of functional IP-receptors. In
`pulmonary hypertension animal models,
`iloprost
`treatment
`leads in _v:'va to an improvement or
`normalisation of pulmonary haemodynamics by reduction in vascular resistance and consequently in
`arterial blood pressure. Leukocyte adhesion to damaged endothelium in viva, and leukocyte
`accumulation in tissue following injury is
`reduced by iloprost.
`Iloprost has shown platelet
`antiaggregatory and antithrombotic effects,
`favorable effects on microvascular perfusion and
`microvascular integrity and inhibition of leukocyte-vessel wall interactions. Iloprost is characterized
`as a common pathway inhibitor of aggregation of human platelets and from varying animal species,
`probably by increasing the endogenous fibrinolytic potential in viva. Moreover, iloprost is able to
`inhibit the procoagulant activity of monocytic cells stimulated with LPS, TNFOL or IL-IB.
`Continuous administration of iloprost does not seem to result in loss of vasodilator response, although
`less of the platelet inhibitory effect of the compound on continuous exposure has been shown. With
`5130
`
`OEMEA 2004
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , IPR2017-01622, Ex. 1039, p. 5 of 30
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , IPR2017-01622, Ex. 1039, p. 5 of 30
`
`

`

`regard to antithrombotic effects, somewhat reduced efficacy to platelet inhibition was seen following-
`continuous intravenous infusion for 9 days. Development of tachyphylaxis to the anti-platelet effect
`can be avoided by discontinuous treatment.
`
`Pharmacodynamic drug interactions
`
`Iloprost has been tested in combination with a number of other cardiovascular drugs. No major
`unexpected interactions were found.
`In animal studies, combinations of iloprost with other vasodilator principles resulted in most cases in
`sub-additive or additive systemic blood pressure lowering effects. An exception to this was the
`markedly super—additive effect on blood pressure seen with the combination of a moderately
`hypotensive dose of an ACE inhibitor
`(captopril) with a non—hypotensive dose of iloprost.
`Pretreatment with dexamethasone attenuated the blood pressure lowering effect of iloprost, but had no
`influence on the antiplatelet effect. Iloprost did not influence the positive inotropic response to the
`cardiac glycoside ouabain.
`1
`With regard to the effects on platelets and coagulation, synergistic inhibition ofplatelet aggregation in
`vitro was
`seen for combinations of iloprost with acetylsalicylic acid NO— donors or
`the
`phosphodiesterase inhibitor piroximone. Combination with anticoagulants such as heparin may result
`in increased bleeding time. Under certain conditions, combination of iloprost with tissue plasminogen
`activator has been shown to reduce plasma t—PA concentration, and may therefore reduce thrombolytic
`efficacy.
`
`General and safety pharmacology programme
`
`Effects of iloprost have been studied on the central and autonomic nervous system and on the cardiac,
`respiratory, renal, gastrointestinal and female reproductive systems. The results of these studies
`performed in animals and in vitro can be summarized as follows:
`.
`-
`Iloprost showed limited direct positive inotropic or chronotropic effects in cardiac tissue in vitro
`that probably do not influence its cardiovascular effects in vivo. The compound improved the
`circulatory shock provoked by ovalbumin injection in cats, which had previously undergone
`passive pre—sensitisation.
`No effects on cardiac action potential, no pro—arrhythmic effects in vitro and in vivo in rats and
`mice.
`
`o
`
`0
`
`0'
`0
`
`Symptoms of depression (probably due to exaggerated pharmacological effects, cg. peripheral
`vasodilatation and hypotension) and, at high doses, of CNS/autonomic stimulation in rats.
`No deleterious effects on respiratory function in vitro and in vivo in rabbits.
`Decreased urine flow and sodium excretion at hypotensive doses, which is rapidly reversed on
`cessation of administration in rats.
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Contractile effects on isolated ileum, little effect or decreased motility and antidiarrhoeio’anti-
`enteropooling effects (depending on model system) in vivo in rats and rabbits.
`Uterine contractile (guinea—pig) or biphasic (human) effects in vitro. No effect on uterine
`pressure and motility in vivo in anaesthetized rabbits, induction of abortion at near—lethal doses
`in guinea pigs.
`None of the studies on the effects of iloprost in various organ systems indicate a potential of the
`compound to induce serious adverse effects in the therapeutic dose range.
`'
`
`Pharmacokinetics
`
`Preclinical pharmacokinetic data are mainly based on conventional routes of drug administration, i.e.
`the intravenous, oral and subcutaneous routes. The pharmacokinetics of pharmacological to subtoxic
`doses of iloprost was studied in rodents (rat, mouse and rabbit) and non-rodent species (cat, dog and
`cynomolgus monkey).
`The pharmacokinetics of iloprost is characterized by very rapid and presumably complete absorption
`from the gastrointestinal tract in the rat, dog and cynomolgus monkey. The bioavailability of orally
`administered drug was approximately 10% of the dose in all species studied (rat, mouse, dog,
`monkey), including humans. The disposition half-life of unchanged iloprost was below 15 min in the
`rat, monkey and dog and about 0.5 h in the cat and in humans.
`6l30
`
`©EMEA 2004
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , IPR2017-01622, Ex. 1039, p. 6 of 30
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , IPR2017-01622, Ex. 1039, p. 6 of 30
`
`

`

`
`'
`'
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Following administration, it rapidly distributes into organs and tissues (with minor passage across the
`blood—brain and blood-placenta barriers) and is extensively biotransformed prior to excretion
`(preferentially via the kidney).
`,
`The pharmacokinetics of iloprost was further studied after inhalative daily administration in rats.
`iloprost serum concentrations rapidly increased reaching Cum 1 “[02 hours after start of inhalation. At
`the doses used (3.6 to 43.7 rig/kg), average Cmax and AUCM were several times those observed in men
`given 5 ug iloprost by inhalation. No important differences were observed in Cam and AUCM between
`sexes and between treatment days. The systemic exposure increased sub—proportionally with
`increasing the dose (3.6 to 43.7 rig/kg) and proportionally with prolonging the inhalation period (from
`135 to 240 min).
`_
`Iloprost isomers exhibited a similar pharmacokinetic behaviour in rats. No conversion of 4R to 43
`iloprost (and vice versa) occurred. The relevant half-life of labelled compounds in plasma was similar
`(0.7 h) in all animal species studied (rat, monkey, dog, mouse and cat). Distribution of 3H-active
`substances into tissues and organs was very rapid. However, concentrations were very low except for
`the liver, kidneys, muscle and stomach. In rabbit foetuses, concentrations of labelled compounds were
`1/200 as compared to maternal plasma.
`'
`Iloprost was totally metabolised in all species studied and the biodegradation products were excreted
`mainly with the urine. Main biotransformation pathways of iloprost were B-oxidation of the upper
`side-chain and hydroxylation at position 17.
`
`Toxicology
`
`Preclinical safety tests included intravenous, subcutaneous and oral studies in rodent and non-rodent
`species. Since the systemic iloprost exposure after parenteral and oral administration exceeds the
`therapeutic inhalative dose levels in humans, it was considered that specific studies of its inhalatory
`toxicity are not crucial. Complementary studies were carried out primarily to ensure the comparability
`of the effects after inhalation to those observed after iloprost oral or intravenous administration
`(“bridging” studies). All studies were done according to GLP rules.
`
`Single dose toxicity
`
`Single dose toxicity studies were carried out in three rodent species (mouse, rat, and rabbit) and in
`monkey, by oral or intravenous administration. Any acute inhalation toxicity study could not be
`carried out because of technical
`impossibility to exceed 0,345 11g of Iloprost per air liter, a
`concentration that does not induce any adverse'effect in the animal, even after chronic treatment.
`
`Design and results (LDso) 0f systemic toxicity tests with a single intravenous (i.v.) and
`intragastric (i.g.) administration:
`
`
`
`10M
`
`amals
`her
`per dose and sex
` Species
`Dose (mg/kg)
`
`125 to 250
`
`0000
`
`
`Rat
`
`
`VRoute of Bdrm—“ration "
`’ thesto—vaand
`95% confidence limits
`(mg/kg)
`201 (179—244)
`000000-040
`
`i
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EV
`50 to 200 __ 119 (85-164)
`M: 128 (92—216)
`V
`
`65 to 200
`25t025
`
`SMISF
`3M/3F
`
`i
`
`.
`
`F: 144 (116—201)
`9.86.5460)
`
`
`
`V g
`
`40 to 100
`40 to 100
`
`
`M a male, F = female, iv. = intravenous, Lg; : intragastric
`
`The values of LDso are much higher than the human therapeutic doses corresponding to six to nine
`administrations per inhalation between five and ten minutes of 2,5 or 5 pg of Iloprost. These human
`therapeutic doses correspond to an intake of 30 to 45 ng/day of Iloprost i.e 0,5 to 0,75 ug/kg/day.
`
`7730
`
`©EMEA 2004
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , IPR2017-01622, Ex. 1039, p. 7 of 30
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , IPR2017-01622, Ex. 1039, p. 7 of 30
`
`

`

`Clinical symptoms, which appeared right from low dose, are common to all species. Most of the
`clinical symptoms at high dose such as apathy, changes of posture, redness of the skin and the mucous
`membranes can be attributed to an exaggerated pharmacological activity of the compound
`(hypotensive and hemodynamic effects). The necrosis of the tail observed in surviving animals
`sacrificed at the end of the study is most probably due to local irritating properties of Iloprost at the
`high concentrations required for these studies.
`Based on the administered doses and the LDso obtained, in spite of the absence of animal data on the
`levels of exposure after inhalation, no special hazard is expected after the single administration of
`iloprost via inhalation.
`
`Repeated dose toxiéily
`
`Subacute toxicity studies were performed by the oral route in rats and monkeys (Macaca fascicularis)
`by repeated intragastric administration of Iicprost solution, and by the intravenous route in rats and
`monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) with repeated intravenous infusion over 3 hours and continuous
`intravenous infusion of Iloprost. -
`
`For the assessment of local and systemic toxicity of iloprost after inhalative administration, Wistar rats
`were exposed by inhalation to three target concentrations generated by nebulization of iloprost
`10
`pg/mL formulation (corresponding to target doses of 0.9, 3.6 and 10.8 rig/kg) and two concentrations
`of iloprost 2O ug/mL (corresponding to target doses of 0.9 and 24.6 pg/kg) daily for 135 minutes on
`seven days a week for 28 days. The selection of dose levels is based .on multiples of the maximum
`human therapeutic dose level of 0.9 ug/kg/day. The duration of exposure was selected to simulate the
`clinical treatment regimen of a maximum of 9 exposure cycles of 15 minutes duration daily.
`Afier 4 weeks inhalation in the rat with an amount considered as maximum. from a technical point of
`view,
`there was no difference in toxic effect (clinical, biological and histological) between the
`different concentrations of Iloprost during or after the exposure. Alter histological examination of the
`respiratory tract, no sign of local irritation was observed.
`
`Summary of the reievant doses for evaluation of systemic tolerance of iloprost after inhalation
`or i.v. administration (subacute toxicity). '
`
`Multiple of the intended human
`dose“ on the basis of
`
`Doses which were tolerated
`without symptoms or with minor
`effects
`
`mike/day
`
`0.0226
`
`0.167
`
`Treatment regimen
`Species
`
`Inhalation for 135 minuteslday
`over 28 days
`Rat
`
`i.v. infusion over 3 hours/day
`(10-11 treatment days)
`
`Continuous i.v. infusion over
`
`
`
`0.2
`0.002
`
`1.11
`0011
`
`2222
`
`139 (9)
`222 (138)
`0.139 (0.09)
`0.2 (124)
`1.4 (1)
`22.2 (13.8)
`0.014 (0.009)
`0.02 (12.4)
`,
`Human therapeutic dose per inhalation session of 10 minutes: 5 pg/patient of 50 kg = 0.1 ug/kg/ 10 min session
`= 0.01 ug/kg/min. For 9 sessions of 10 minutes/day the total dose is 0.9 ug/kg.
`
`iloprost related alterations found in the subacute toxicity studies afier different routes of
`All
`administration in rodents and non-rodents are mainly attributed to thehemodynamic properties of
`iloprost. At very high exposure levels, the hemodynamic changes led to the death of experimental
`animals, however direct organ toxicity was not observed. Considering a single inhalation dose of 5
`ug/patient (= 0.1 rig/kg for a patient of 50 kg body weight for 10 minutes) administered up to 9 times a
`day as the intended mode of application, it can be concluded that on the basis of total administered
`dose/day and on the basis of dose/kg/min, many times higher dosages of iloprost were tolerated in rats
`after inhalation than after administration via the intravenous or .oral routes of administration- In
`8130
`.
`©EMEA 2004
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , IPR2017-01622, Ex. 1039, p. 8 of 30
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , IPR2017-01622, Ex. 1039, p. 8 of 30
`
`

`

`monkeys, which were more sensitive to iloprost, the doses that were tolerated without or with minor
`symptoms after parenteral and oral administration were in the same range or slightly above the dose
`levels of human inhalative therapeutic treatment.
`
`Chronic toxicity studies were carried out in rats and dogs by intravenous or sub cutaneous continuous
`infusion or oral administration of Iloprost over 6 months. A chronic inhalation toxicity study was
`conducted in rats overl26 weeks (periods of 135 or 240 min/day).
`
`Continuous infusion of Iloprost up to the highest dose of 347 ng/kg/min (0.5 mg/kg/day) over 26
`weeks in rats did not produce any organ-toxic effect, but slight effects related to the pharmacological
`profile of the compound. The mean plasma levels of Iloprost at the highest dose were for females
`3.5 ng/ml and for males 5.0 ng/ml. In dogs, continuous s.c. infiision of iloprost up to the highest dose
`of 67 ng/kg/min (0.097 mg/kg/day) over 26 weeks did not produce any organ—toxic damage, though
`adverse effects related to gastrointestinal motility could be observed transiently from the mid~dose
`(33-34 ng/kg/min; 0.049 mg/kg/day) leading to mean plasma levels of 0.9 ng/ml onwards. The mean
`plasma levels of Iloprost at the highest dose were 1.6 and 2.1 ng/ml in female and male animals,
`respectively.
`
`The daily inhalative administration of a nebulizing solution of Iloprost at a concentration of 20 rig/m1
`over 26 weeks in rats, with a maximum technically achievable'aerosol concentration which led to a
`maximum achievable dose of 48.7 rig/kg body weight, did not cause adverse effects. The technically
`possible maximum amount (0,4 ug/l air) corresponding to 0,203 ng/kg/min (h

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket