throbber
(AMI-l
`
`mm
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 121
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`associated with that.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`What are those advantages?
`
`The advantages with respect to
`
`competition. Customer recognition is a good
`
`thing for competition in the market.
`
`Q.
`
`So basically if you are the
`
`first on the market, everyone knows about --
`
`strike that.
`
`If you are the first on the
`
`market, you are the only drug that people know
`
`about, and you have no competition, right, for
`
`that specific treatment?
`
`A.
`
`For the period of time where
`
`you are the only product on the market. Of
`
`course, you would still call something a first
`
`mover once additional competition comes on to
`
`the market.
`
`Q.
`
`Would you agree that a second
`
`market entrant in the same market segment may
`
`face a greater challenge to gain market share?
`
`A.
`
`That may be true.
`
`It depends
`
`on the situation.
`
`Sometimes a second mover can
`
`have the advantage that a certain type of
`
`
`
`therapy or practice has been established, and
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1210f297
`
`

`

`(AMI-l
`
`mm
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 122
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`they benefit positively from that.
`
`So it just
`
`depends on the situation.
`
`was
`
`the case in this case?
`
`Did you look to see if that
`
`It would be odd for me to draw
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`I am not sure what you mean.
`
`I am aware that Venativs was launched before
`
`Tyvaso if that's what you mean.
`
`Q.
`
`You don't provide any opinions
`
`about whether it was an advantage or
`
`disadvantage for Tyvaso to be the second market
`
`entrant into inhaled treatment for pulmonary
`
`hypertension, correct?
`
`A.
`
`I don't view that as the
`
`correct market definition.
`
`I wouldn‘t call
`
`Tyvaso the second market entrant here.
`
`Q.
`
`Well, assume for this question
`
`I am just talking about the inhaled pulmonary
`
`hypertension treatments as a market. You don't
`
`provide any opinion about the fact that Tyvaso
`
`was
`
`the second market entrant in that same
`
`market, correct?
`
`A.
`
`an opinion on a market that I don't think is
`
`correct or relevant, but I agree that I don't
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1220f297
`
`

`

`(AMI-l
`
`mm
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 123
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`focus on order of market entry between Tyvaso
`
`and Venativs.
`
`I don't view it as particularly
`
`impactful here.
`
`Q.
`
`And you agree that Tyvaso has
`
`performed better over time than Venativs in
`
`terms of sales, correct?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`It has had greater sales, yes.
`
`Now, moving to the other
`
`pulmonary hypertension drugs that are not
`
`inhaled that you included in your market
`
`definition, earlier we also discussed there are
`
`different stages of pulmonary arterial
`
`hypertension, correct?
`
`A.
`
`Groups I think they are
`
`typically referred to.
`
`Is that what you mean?
`
`Q.
`
`Yes, or -— well, actually
`
`let's just -- if you look at the Venativs
`
`label, for example, Exhibit 1160, under
`
`Indications and Usage,
`
`the last sentence says:
`
`"Studies establishing effectiveness included
`
`predominantly patients with NYHA Functional
`
`Class III to IV symptoms and etiologies of
`
`idiopathic or heritable pulmonary arterial
`
`
`
`hypertension or pulmonary arterial hypertension
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1230f297
`
`

`

`Page 124
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`associated with connective tissue diseases."
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`Yes.
`
`So there's a couple things
`
`here.
`
`So —- well, first, do you have an
`
`understanding of what NYHA Functional Class
`
`symptoms are?
`
`A.
`
`I presume they are just a
`
`description of symptoms associated with the
`
`disease.
`
`Q.
`
`Are you aware that there‘s
`
`four classes of symptoms under that?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`That sounds right.
`
`Is it your understanding that
`
`each class of symptoms -— strike that.
`
`Is it your understanding that
`
`pulmonary hypertension is a progressive
`
`disease?
`
`A.
`
`That sounds familiar.
`
`I don't
`
`recall specifically addressing that in my
`
`declaration.
`
`Q.
`
`Is it your understanding that
`
`the class symptoms increase as the disease
`
`
`
`progresses?
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1240f297
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Page 125
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`A.
`
`That's consistent with my
`
`experience.
`
`Q.
`
`And so, for example, a patient
`
`with Class I symptoms may be treated
`
`differently than a patient with Class IV
`
`symptoms, correct?
`
`A.
`
`That may be true.
`
`It's not
`
`something I have specifically evaluated in my
`
`declaration or opined about.
`
`Q.
`
`So you don't know if patients
`
`with different class symptoms are treated
`
`differently with different medications?
`
`A.
`
`There may be some nuances with
`
`respect to treatment.
`
`Some options may be more
`
`effective for patients at various difference
`
`classes.
`
`It's not a distinction that was in
`
`the evidence when evaluating the relevant
`
`market.
`
`So it's not something that I focused
`
`on.
`
`Q.
`
`You have said it's not in the
`
`evidence that you evaluated?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`
`If you turn to your
`
`
`
`declaration Exhibit 1055 for the '50? patent
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1250f297
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Page 126
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`with the exhibits attached, and if you look at
`
`Attachment B-8 Competing PAH Therapies.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`
`So, for example,
`
`the first
`
`drug Remodulin lists effectiveness for patients
`
`with Class II to IV symptoms.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`Yes.
`
`And Tyvaso is only listed for
`
`patients with Class III symptoms, correct?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`
`Adcirca is for patients with
`
`Class II to III symptoms, correct?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`I see that, yes.
`
`So without going through all
`
`of these, each of these drugs have their own
`
`uses in terms of patients with certain types of
`
`symptoms -— strike that.
`
`Each of these drugs are used
`
`for patients with certain types of symptoms,
`
`correct?
`
`A.
`
`Yes,
`
`the indications are not
`
`identical.
`
`They all relate to pulmonary
`
`
`
`arterial hypertension.
`Tyvaso has a narrower
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1260f297
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Page 127
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`label.
`
`In other words, it's useful in fewer
`
`patients, and so it's a more limited commercial
`
`opportunity.
`
`Q.
`
`Did you account for the fact
`
`that other pulmonary hypertension drugs were
`
`listed for patients with wider variety of
`
`symptoms?
`
`A.
`
`Yes, that's reflected in the
`
`sales data where a product that has
`
`applicability to a wider set of patients
`
`because of a broader or narrower indication is
`
`able to achieve more sales.
`
`So comparison of
`
`sales is where that is manifested in the
`
`economic data.
`
`Q.
`
`If a drug is only used to
`
`treat specific symptoms, isn't it fair to
`
`compare only other drugs that treat those same
`
`symptoms?
`
`MR. MATHAS: Object
`
`to the form.
`
`BY THE WITNESS:
`
`A.
`
`No, not in my opinion. That's
`
`not correct here.
`
`BY MR. DELAFIELD:
`
`
`
`Why is that?
`Q.
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1270f297
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`A.
`
`Because that's the incorrect
`
`Page 128
`
`way to think about competition here.
`
`They
`
`have
`
`-— there are a number of products
`
`competing for PAH sales, and they have
`
`different attributes and different coverage and
`
`different effectiveness, but it's the broader
`
`competition that tells you about the market
`
`opportunity for treating pulmonary arterial
`
`hypertension. Drug submarkets or segments with
`
`respect to symptoms is not something that‘s
`
`appropriate or consistent with what I have
`
`reviewed.
`
`THE WITNESS: And we have been
`
`going for a while. Maybe at some point we
`
`should break for lunch.
`
`MR. DELAFIELD:
`
`Do you have lunch
`
`here yet?
`
`break.
`
`MR. MATHAS:
`
`It should be here.
`
`MR. DELAFIELD: Yeah, we can take a
`
`THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
`
`The time is now
`
`12:35 p.m. This is the end of media 2. We are
`
`off the record.
`
`
`
`(AMI-l
`
`mm
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1280f297
`
`

`

`Page 129
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`(WHEREUPON, a recess was had at
`
`12:35 p.m. until 1:26 p.m.)
`
`THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
`
`The time is now
`
`1:26 p.m. This is the beginning of media 3.
`
`We are back on the record.
`
`BY MR. DELAFIELD:
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Welcome back.
`
`Thank you.
`
`I think when we left, we were
`
`talking about your declaration Exhibit 1055 for
`
`the '507 patent and Attachment B-8, and we were
`
`discussing how these different drugs have
`
`different indications depending on what
`
`symptoms they treat, correct?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes,
`
`I recall that.
`
`If you look at page 10 at
`
`Adempas, and in the -- under Indication the
`
`first bullet point says:
`
`"Persistent/recurrent
`
`Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension
`
`after surgical treatment or inoperable (CTEPH)
`
`to improve exercise capacity and WHO functional
`
`class."
`
`Do you see that?
`
`
`
`A.
`Yes.
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1290f297
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Page 130
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`Q.
`
`And then separately it's also
`
`indicated for pulmonary arterial hypertension
`
`to improve exercise capacity,
`
`improve WHO
`
`functional class and to delay clinical
`
`worsening.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`Yes.
`
`So just as an example, Adempas
`
`is specifically prescribed for chronic
`
`thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, correct?
`
`MR. MATHAS: Object to the form.
`
`BY THE WITNESS:
`
`A.
`
`That's part of the indication.
`
`BY MR. DELAFIELD:
`
`Q.
`
`And Tyvaso is not prescribed
`
`for that purpose, correct?
`
`A.
`
`It's not indicated for that,
`
`that's right.
`
`Q.
`
`So at least for patients with
`
`chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension,
`
`Tyvaso doesn't compete in the same market as
`
`Adempas for that condition, correct?
`
`MR. MATHAS: Object
`
`to the form.
`
`
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1300f297
`
`

`

`(AMI-l
`
`mm
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 131
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`BY THE WITNESS:
`
`A.
`
`I haven't seen evidence that
`
`Tyvaso is prescribed for that.
`
`I haven‘t seen
`
`evidence of it.
`
`I have not specifically
`
`evaluated it, though.
`
`BY MR. DELAFIELD:
`
`Q.
`
`But you didn't account for the
`
`differences in the indications for these drugs
`
`being different than Tyvaso in your analysis of
`
`the sales and revenue, correct?
`
`A.
`
`I don't agree with that.
`
`The
`
`differences in the indications are reflected in
`
`the sales data.
`
`So if one drug has a slightly
`
`more effective indication than another drug,
`
`perhaps that drug has more sales.
`
`So it's one
`
`of the inputs that is reflected in the economic
`
`data.
`
`Q.
`
`Well, I am talking about
`
`indications not effectiveness.
`
`For example, if
`
`a drug is indicated to treat three different
`
`things —— strike that.
`
`In your opinion if drug A is
`
`indicated to treat three conditions and drug B
`
`
`
`is indicated to treat just one of those three
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1310f297
`
`

`

`Page 132
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`conditions, would you say it's fair to compare
`
`sales -- total sales of both drugs to each
`
`other?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`It depends on one‘s purpose.
`
`What do you mean by that?
`
`Perhaps it would be fair in
`
`some context but not fair in other context.
`
`Q.
`
`Well,
`
`in this context there's
`
`no indication that Tyvaso is used to treat
`
`CTEPH, correct?
`
`MR. MATHAS: Object to form.
`
`BY THE WITNESS:
`
`A.
`
`That's my understanding, yes.
`
`BY MR. DELAFIELD:
`
`Q.
`
`So sales of the Adempas to
`
`treat that form of pulmonary hypertension do
`
`not directly compete with sales of Tyvaso,
`
`correct?
`
`A.
`
`Again,
`
`I haven't seen evidence
`
`that Tyvaso is prescribed for chronic
`
`thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
`
`Perhaps
`
`they don't compete for those prescriptions.
`
`Looking through the rest of 3—8 and the other
`
`
`
`one,
`two,
`three -— 13 products here,
`I don't
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1320f297
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Page 133
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`see that as being a pervasive issue.
`
`It looks
`
`specific to Adempas but none of the other
`
`products on this list.
`
`So while that may be
`
`true for Adempas,
`
`I don't view this to be an
`
`impactful issue.
`
`Q.
`
`Other than the separate
`
`indication, each drug does have slightly
`
`different functional class Symptoms that they
`
`are designed to treat, correct?
`
`MR. MATHAS: Object
`
`to the form.
`
`BY THE WITNESS:
`
`A.
`
`Some may be the same, but
`
`there are frequently slight differences. Yes,
`
`I agree.
`
`BY MR. DELAFIELD:
`
`Q.
`
`Are you aware that patients
`
`taking -- strike that.
`
`Are you familiar with
`
`Remodulin?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`
`And Remodulin is taken via IV
`
`or subcutaneous, correct?
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`
`
`Do you understand that
`Q.
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1330f297
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Page 134
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`Remodulin is primarily reserved for patients
`
`with pulmonary hypertension that is an advanced
`
`stage of pulmonary hypertension?
`
`MR. MATHAS: Object
`
`to the form.
`
`BY THE WITNESS:
`
`A.
`
`I don't see that here in
`
`Attachment B-8.
`
`It appears to be approved for
`
`Classes II to IV symptoms.
`
`I don't recall
`
`whether it‘s reserved for advanced stage
`
`sitting here.
`
`BY MR. DELAFIELD:
`
`Q.
`
`Let me ask it another way.
`
`Can all patients with PAH use inhaled
`
`formulations?
`
`patient.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`It probably depends on the
`
`Well,
`
`I am asking if a patient
`
`has pulmonary arterial hypertension, can they
`
`use Tyvaso to help alleviate their symptoms no
`
`matter what their symptoms are or how severe
`
`their pulmonary hypertension is?
`
`MR. MATHAS: Object
`
`to the form.
`
`BY THE WITNESS:
`
`
`
`They may be able to. There
`A.
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1340f297
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`(AMI-l
`
`mm
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 135
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`may be varying effectiveness of certain
`
`medications on certain types of patients.
`
`Physicians evaluate that on a case-by-case
`
`basis. That's my understanding.
`
`BY MR. DELAFIELD:
`
`Q.
`
`Did you attempt to
`
`differentiate the different forms of the drugs
`
`in terms of when and how they are used with
`
`patients?
`
`A.
`
`I am aware of the different
`
`forms.
`
`You can see that in the Form column on
`
`Attachment B-8.
`
`So I am aware of those
`
`differences across products.
`
`Q.
`
`I guess I am trying to
`
`understand your basis for your opinion that all
`
`forms equally compete against Tyvaso for
`
`treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
`
`I guess my question is if a
`
`patient can't use a specific form of therapy,
`
`it's not a choice to use one pulmonary
`
`hypertension therapy over another, correct?
`
`A.
`
`I am not sure I follow the
`
`question. Could you ask it again?
`
`
`
`So let's take, for example, a
`Q.
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1350f297
`
`

`

`Page 136
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`patient takes Orenitram which is an oral form
`
`of treprostinil. Are with me?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`And that pill doesn‘t work at
`
`all for them, and then they take Tyvaso and it
`
`does work. Would you say that those two
`
`products still compete with respect to that
`
`patient specifically?
`
`A.
`
`Yes,
`
`I would.
`
`I think that
`
`example illustrates the point which is that
`
`patients have different options across
`
`different forms, and some options may be more
`
`effective for certain patients in certain
`
`circumstances, and that's the market in which
`
`the products compete. There are multiple
`
`options, and what we examine in economic data
`
`is which products are more successful within
`
`that market.
`
`Q.
`
`But each indication of all the
`
`drugs listed in B—8 specify specifically what
`
`class of symptoms they are designed to treat,
`
`right?
`
`A.
`
`Yes, but indications don‘t
`
`
`
`need to be identical to be in the same relevant
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1360f297
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Page 137
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`market.
`
`Q.
`
`If you turn to Attachment 3-8,
`
`the first page 8 Adcirca.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`Yes.
`
`And under Indication it says:
`
`"Adcirca is a phosphodiesterase 5
`
`(PDES)
`
`inhibitor indicated for the treatment of
`
`pulmonary arterial hypertension to improve
`
`exercise ability."
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`Yes.
`
`Did you account for any
`
`differences in Adcirca or any of these drugs in
`
`terms of the type of drug compared to Tyvaso?
`
`A.
`
`This is the same answer as
`
`before.
`
`I did indirectly because that
`
`manifests itself into the sales data.
`
`Different drugs have different active
`
`ingredients or classes of ingredients, and they
`
`have different level of effectiveness.
`
`As a
`
`result,
`
`that shows up in the economic data in
`
`sales, and that's what
`
`I have examined.
`
`
`
`Q.
`If you turn back to paragraph
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1370f297
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Page 138
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`11 in your declaration and the last sentence
`
`starting at page 5 states:
`
`"For the treatment
`
`of PAH,
`
`in particular approved pharmaceuticals
`
`target one of three major biochemical
`
`pathways," and then it lists three pathways.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`those pathways?
`
`Do you see that?
`
`Yes.
`
`Do you understand each of
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`What do you mean by that?
`
`Well, can you explain to me
`
`what an endothelin receptor antagonist is?
`
`A.
`
`Well,
`
`I am an economist, not a
`
`clinician, but my understanding is that it
`
`targets the endothelin receptors.
`
`It's a class
`
`of drugs that has that particular mechanism of
`
`action.
`
`Q.
`
`And what's an endothelin
`
`receptor?
`
`A.
`
`I don't recall specifically
`
`sitting here.
`
`Q.
`
`And for this paragraph, you
`
`put footnote 3.
`
`
`
`Do you see that?
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1380f297
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Page 139
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`Yes.
`
`And you don't cite Dr. Donovan
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`for that paragraph, correct?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Correct.
`
`So in general do these three
`
`pathways treat pulmonary arterial hypertension
`
`in different ways?
`
`A.
`
`If you are asking for a
`
`clinical opinion,
`
`then that question is
`
`probably better for a clinical or technical
`
`expert. My understanding is that these are
`
`different mechanism of action -— different
`
`mechanisms of action that treat a similar set
`
`of symptoms.
`
`So patients have a similar set
`
`of symptoms, and there are different classes of
`
`products that have different mechanisms for
`
`improving those symptoms and treating the
`
`disease.
`
`So that's my understanding of how the
`
`different pathways work as an economist.
`
`Q.
`
`So for your economic analysis,
`
`you didn't differentiate between these three
`
`pathways in terms of what would and would not
`
`
`
`compete with Tyvaso, correct?
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1390f297
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`A.
`
`I am aware of these
`
`Page 140
`
`differences.
`
`I
`
`took them into account by
`
`analyzing the sales data, but I did not define
`
`submarkets according to these distinctions.
`
`I
`
`don't view that as appropriate or consistent
`
`with the evidence I have seen.
`
`The evidence I
`
`have seen supports competition across these
`
`pathways.
`
`Q.
`
`And so you don't know how
`
`Tyvaso compares to other drugs that have the
`
`same biochemical pathway, correct?
`
`that.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`I am not sure what you mean by
`
`You didn't do an analysis of
`
`the subgroups, correct?
`
`A.
`
`I did not create submarkets
`
`based on these pathways, nor do I think that's
`
`appropriate here.
`
`Q.
`
`And you didn't create
`
`submarkets based on drug form either, correct?
`
`A.
`
`Correct, nor do I agree that's
`
`appropriate.
`
`Q.
`
`And you didn't create
`
`
`
`submarkets based on the symptoms listed in the
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1400f297
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Page 141
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`indication, correct?
`
`A.
`
`Correct.
`
`I don't view that as
`
`appropriate in light of the evidence I
`
`reviewed.
`
`Q.
`
`You also did not consider in
`
`your analysis how long each of the products
`
`were on the market before reaching their peak
`
`sales, correct?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`I don't agree with that.
`
`Well, let's turn to your
`
`Exhibit -- or Attachment B—5.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`And this is a comparison to
`
`PAH drug revenues showing sales for peak years
`
`for each of the drugs; is that correct?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`
`And in this attachment you
`
`don't specify when the drug was first launched,
`
`correct?
`
`A.
`
`Not in this attachment, but
`
`one can see it in Attachment B—4 on the
`
`previous page.
`
`Q.
`
`But in your conclusions
`
`
`
`regarding peak sales, you don't provide any
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1410f297
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`(AMI-l
`
`mm
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 142
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`analysis of what effect, if any,
`
`the year the
`
`peak sales came about based on the year the
`
`drug was launched, right?
`
`A.
`
`I don't agree with that, and
`
`in particular I would point you to paragraph 24
`
`where I indicate what the impact of different
`
`drugs being on the market for different lengths
`
`of time has which is that we know Tyvaso has
`
`already achieved peak sales because its sales
`
`have already started declining from 2015 to
`
`2016 and then from 2016 to 2017 based on the
`
`most recent data reported by UTC. Whereas,
`
`other drugs are continuing to increase.
`
`They
`
`have not already hit peak sales.
`
`So this comparison will look
`
`even more favorable to the other drugs and less
`
`favorable to Tyvaso into the future.
`
`So that‘s
`
`the sense in which I am thinking about how long
`
`the drugs have been on the market and whether
`
`their sales will continue to increase.
`
`Q.
`
`So if a drug had a
`
`particularly good year and had extremely high
`
`peak sales one year and low sales before and
`
`
`
`after that, do you still think that peak annual
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1420f297
`
`

`

`Page 143
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`sales are a relevant factor to consider?
`
`A.
`
`That's not a typical situation
`
`that occurs in pharmaceuticals.
`
`Sales tend to
`
`be more similar from year to year or increasing
`
`or decreasing on a more regular basis.
`
`It's
`
`not frequently the case that sales vary wildly
`
`from one year to the next.
`
`Q.
`
`Well,
`
`I am asking
`
`hypothetically if a product has one really good
`
`year for whatever reason and before and after
`
`have low sales, doesn't that mean that peak
`
`sales for that year are not really indicative
`
`of commercial success?
`
`MR. MATHAS: Object to the form.
`
`BY THE WITNESS:
`
`A.
`
`That's a theoretical situation
`
`that could be true in some circumstances.
`
`It‘s
`
`not true generally in pharmaceuticals, and it's
`
`not true based on the evidence I have reviewed
`
`here in this case.
`
`I have reviewed sales
`
`across all years, and peak sales are the good
`
`summary statistic for comparing across products
`
`based on that analysis.
`
`
`
`(AMI-l
`
`mm
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1430f297
`
`

`

`Page 144
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`BY MR. DELAFIELD:
`
`Q.
`
`For your peak sale analysis,
`
`did you -- strike that.
`
`Your declaration does not
`
`disclose any analysis for peak sales of the
`
`various drugs in relation to factors that may
`
`affect that year's sales that are unique to the
`
`drug, correct?
`
`MR. MATHAS: Object
`
`to the form.
`
`BY THE WITNESS:
`
`A.
`
`I am not sure what you have in
`
`mind. Could you explain?
`
`BY MR. DELAFIELD:
`
`Q.
`
`So, for example, if a brand
`
`drug comes on the market and for some reason
`
`the very next year a generic comes on the
`
`market,
`
`their peak sales might be the first
`
`year.
`
`Apologies.
`
`Is that a fair assessment?
`
`A.
`
`That doesn't tend to happen
`
`but it could.
`
`Q.
`
`So external factors such as
`
`
`
`the launch of a generic can affect sales for
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page 144 of 297
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`(AMI-l
`
`mm
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 145
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`any given year, correct?
`
`A.
`
`They can.
`
`Sales can decline
`
`after generics come on the market. That's
`
`frequently what happens.
`
`Q.
`
`And, similarly, if a drug
`
`comes on the market with the same indication
`
`and is followed quickly by another drug with
`
`the exact same indication,
`
`their peak sale year
`
`may be different just based on the fact of the
`
`timing of the competition, correct?
`
`A.
`
`It could be. That's how
`
`competition works.
`
`Q.
`
`So peak annual sales could be
`
`the result of external factors such as other
`
`drugs coming on or off the market or other
`
`drugs becoming genericized, correct?
`
`A.
`
`Well, you described them as
`
`external factors, but they are relevant
`
`factors.
`
`They are relevant factors for
`
`competition, and it's the set of factors —— the
`
`set of competitive factors that determines how
`
`well a products does.
`
`So it's relevant to the
`
`analysis.
`
`
`
`But for commercial success,
`Q.
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1450f297
`
`

`

`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`there must be a nexus to the patented elements,
`
`Page 146
`
`correct?
`
`a nexus .
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Generally, yes,
`
`there must be
`
`And so if sales are really
`
`good or really bad based on factors that are
`
`not related to the patent,
`
`then they would be
`
`external factors, correct?
`
`A.
`
`You don't frequently hear that
`
`term, but I see what you are saying. That's
`
`not the way it's typically described.
`
`Q.
`
`If you could turn to paragraph
`
`33 of your declaration.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`I'm there.
`
`And the second sentence says:
`
`"For example, Tyvaso's designation as an orphan
`
`drug (reserved for products with low commercial
`
`opportunity and/or fewer than 200,000 U.S.
`
`patients) indicates limited economic
`
`opportunity."
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`Yes.
`
`So you understand Tyvaso is an
`
`
`
`orphan drug, right?
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1460f297
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Page 147
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`Yes.
`
`And there are fewer than
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`200,
`
`000 U.S. patients, correct, according to
`
`your definition here?
`
`A.
`
`Well, orphan drug status can
`
`be granted based on a low commercial
`
`opportunity or fewer than 200,000 patients.
`
`I
`
`don't recall which prong was met for Tyvaso,
`
`and I don't recall whether the current count of
`
`PAH treatment is less than 200,000.
`
`I would
`
`have to go back and check.
`
`Q.
`
`Do you know how many people in
`
`the U.S. approximately have pulmonary
`
`hypertension?
`
`A.
`
`I believe it‘s in the hundreds
`
`of thousands, but I would have to go back and
`
`look to confirm.
`
`Q.
`
`So it could be fewer than
`
`200,
`
`000, correct?
`
`A.
`
`It could be, and I believe it
`
`was
`
`at one point in time.
`
`Q.
`
`Orphan drug status is specific
`
`to number of patients because the FDA requires
`
`
`
`less to get their approval simply because
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1470f297
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`(AMI-l
`
`mm
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 148
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`there's not enough people for clinical trials.
`
`Have you heard that? Are you
`
`familiar with that concept?
`
`A.
`
`I don't believe that's the
`
`primary economic rationale for granting orphan
`
`drug status.
`
`I believe it has to do with
`
`limited commercial opportunity and wanting to
`
`provide incentives for development where there
`
`otherwise would not be.
`
`Q.
`
`But to your knowledge,
`
`the FDA
`
`designates whether or not a drug is an orphan
`
`drug, correct?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes,
`
`I believe so.
`
`And the FDA doesn't care about
`
`commercial opportunity.
`
`Just whether or not
`
`there's enough patients to qualify for the
`
`required clinical testing, right?
`
`MR. MATHAS: Object to the form.
`
`BY THE WITNESS:
`
`A.
`
`That may be one factor that
`
`they consider. Again,
`
`there are two prongs
`
`under which a drug can qualify for orphan drug
`
`status:
`
`The number of patients and also a lack
`
`
`
`of commercial opportunity.
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`ww.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1480f297
`
`

`

`Page 149
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`BY MR. DELAFIELD:
`
`Q.
`
`But it's your opinion that at
`
`most patients with pulmonary hypertension are
`
`in the hundreds of thousands, correct?
`
`A.
`
`As I indicated earlier,
`
`that's
`
`my best recollection, but to be sure,
`
`I would
`
`have to go back and confirm.
`
`I don't recall
`
`the specific figure sitting here.
`
`Q.
`
`There's approximately 325
`
`million people in the U.S.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Do you agree with that?
`
`More or less.
`
`So even if the full 200,000
`
`patients had pulmonary hypertension,
`
`that would
`
`be far less than 1 percent of the U.S.
`
`population, correct?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`
`Now, if you turn to paragraph
`
`23,
`
`you say:
`
`"First, Tyvaso's annual sales
`
`ranging from $152 million to $470 million are
`
`not exceptional or even above average in the
`
`context of pharmaceutical product sales."
`
`Do you see that?
`
`
`
`Yes.
`A.
`
`
`800-642-1099
`
`A Veritext Company
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`David Feidman Worldwide
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS, EX. 2035
`WATSON LABORATORIES v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS, |PR2017-01622
`
`Page1490f297
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Page 150
`
`DEFOREST MCDUFF, Ph.D.
`
`Q.
`
`And then you go on to analyze
`
`the first —- strike that.
`
`You go on to analyze the top
`
`two decile percentages for drugs, correct?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`As w

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket