`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WATSON LABORATORIES, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORP.
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01621
`Patent No. 9,358,240
`
`Case No: PR2017-01622
`Patent No. 9,339,507
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`KURT A. MATHAS UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`PO Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313–1450
`Submitted Electronically via the Patent Review Processing System
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10, and pursuant to the authorization provided by
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`(“Board”) in the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing
`
`Patent Owner Preliminary Response (Paper Number 4, July 13, 2017) (“the Notice”),
`
`Petitioner WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. (“Petitioner”) submits this motion
`
`for KURT A. MATHAS to appear pro hac vice. Petitioner respectfully requests the
`
`Board to recognize Mr. Mathas as counsel pro hac vice during this proceeding and
`
`demonstrates good cause for doing so as shown below.
`
`I.
`
`TIME FOR FILING
`
`Pursuant to the authorization provided in the Notice, as well as the “Order –
`
`Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel
`
`Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639, Paper 7 (Oct. 15, 2013) (“the Order”), this motion for
`
`pro hac vice admission is being filed no sooner than twenty-one (21) days after
`
`service of the Petition.
`
`II.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`Pursuant to the Order, the following statement of facts shows that good cause
`
`exists for the Board to recognize Mr. Mathas pro hac vice.
`
`Lead counsel for this proceeding, Michael K. Nutter, is a registered
`
`practitioner (Reg. No. 44,979).
`
`NY:1837183.1
`
`
`
`
`
`Mr. Mathas is an experienced litigation attorney with twelve years of litigation
`
`experience. Ex. 1167, ¶ 8. He has been involved in numerous patent infringement
`
`cases in federal district courts across the country. Id. He has experience in various
`
`aspects of patent infringement matters, including all aspects of litigation leading up
`
`to and including jury trials and bench trials. Id.
`
`Mr. Mathas is a member in good standing of the State Bar of Illinois and is
`
`admitted to practice before the Federal Circuit Court of Appeal, Seventh Circuit
`
`Court of Appeal, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern District of Texas, District of
`
`Colorado and Western District of Michigan. Id., ¶ 1.
`
`Mr. Mathas has not been suspended or disbarred from practice, has never had
`
`any application for admission to practice denied, and has never had any sanctions or
`
`contempt citations imposed against him. Id., ¶¶ 2-4.
`
`Mr. Mathas has obtained substantial familiarity with the involved patent, the
`
`prior art, and the various issues raised in this proceeding. Moreover, Mr. Mathas has
`
`reviewed the involved patent, the Petition, the prior art, and all other cited materials
`
`and was involved in the preparation of the Petition upon which the Board instituted
`
`trial. Id., ¶ 8. Specifically, he was the outside counsel primarily responsible for the
`
`day-to-day management of the district court litigation and was involved in analysis
`
`of the prior art and developing and litigating the invalidity defenses for the involved
`
`patents in the district court action. Id. Given his patent litigation experience and his
`
`NY:1837183.1
`
`
`
`
`
`familiarity with the instant Petition, the cited materials, and the patent, Mr. Mathas
`
`has established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. Id.
`
`Mr. Mathas has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules for Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the C.F.R.,
`
`and he agrees to be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in
`
`37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq., and to disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`11.19(a). Id., ¶¶ 5-6.
`
`Mr. Mathas has not applied to appear pro hac vice in the last three years in
`
`any other matter before the Board. Id., ¶ 7. He is concurrently seeking admission
`
`in IPR2017-01621 related to U.S. Patent No. 9,358,240 and IPR2017-01622 related
`
`to U.S. Patent No. 9,339,507, which are related patents.
`
`Given Mr. Mathas’s familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding, Petitioner respectfully submit that they have shown good cause for the
`
`Board to recognize Mr. Mathas as counsel pro hac vice during this proceeding.
`
`III. AFFIDAVIT OR DECLARATION OF INDIVIDUAL SEEKING TO
`APPEAR
`
`This Motion is accompanied by a Declaration of Mr. Mathas as required by
`
`the Order.
`
`NY:1837183.1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: January 25, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Michael K. Nutter/
`Michael K. Nutter, Lead Counsel
`Reg. No. 44,979
`Andrew R. Sommer, Back-Up Counsel
`Reg. No. 53,932
`Kurt A. Mathas, Back-Up Counsel
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`
`NY:1837183.1
`
`
`
`
`
`§ 42.6(e)—CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`In accordance with § 42.6(e)(1), the undersigned certifies that on the 25th day
`
`of January, 2018, PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE
`
`ADMISSION OF KURT A. MATHAS was served by electronic mail upon the
`
`following counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Stephen B. Maebius
`Email: smaebius@foley.com
`
`UT240-IPR@foley.com
`
`George Quillin
`Email: gquillin@foley.com
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`
`Shaun R. Snader
`Email: ssnader@unither.com
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORP
`
`Douglas Carsten
`Email: dcarsten@wsgr.com
`
`Richard Torczon
`Email: rtorczon@wsgr.com
`
`Robert Delafield
`Email: bdelafield@wsgr.com
`
`Veronica Ascarrunz
`Email: vascarrunz@wsgr.com
`WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATI
`
`
`
`
`NY:1837183.1
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: January 25, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Michael K. Nutter/
`Michael K. Nutter,
`Reg. No. 44,979
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`
`NY:1837183.1
`
`