throbber
• . . . •
`• • •
`
`•
`• •
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`•• •
`•
`•• •
`•
`• • • •
`• •
`• •
`••
`• • •
`
`BYFAX
`
`V
`
`DFW /aja
`11 May 2000
`
`The European Patent Office
`Erhardtstraise 27
`D-8000
`MUNCHEN
`Germany
`
`• •
`• •
`• •
`•
`•
`
`• • • •
`• •
`• •
`•
`
`. w--==··fy
`
`Patents & Trade Marks Dept
`Huntercombe Lane South
`Taplow, Maidenhead
`Berkshire, SL6 0PH
`Tel: +44 (0)1628 604377
`, '.' f,3x: ~.4.1 (0)1~ 628 799098
`·;,; i·; \\i
`; _ .. i,
`i,
`
`' / f ~J
`
`~;•
`
`\)':•
`\
`
`Dear Sirs
`
`.I
`
`....
`
`i ' -
`
`RE: European Patent Application No 95915671.~
`American Home Products Corporation Cas~93171
`
`i
`
`'
`
`-
`
`I refer to the Communication pursuant to Article 96(2) and Rule 51(2) EPC dated 1
`September 1999.
`
`Dealing in turn with the points raised by the Examiner:
`
`It is noted that the new claims filed on 10 October 1996 are based on the
`1.
`original disclosure.
`
`2 and 3.
`
`The Examining Division considers the Documents Dl - D4 as relevant.
`
`US 4650803
`Dl
`=
`WO-A-9205179
`D2
`=
`US 5233036
`D3
`=
`D4
`Tetrahedron Letters 35(1994), 1019-1022
`=
`Novelty over Dl - D4 is acknowledged.
`
`A
`•
`
`The Applicants point out that the problem solved by the present application is
`4.1
`to provide hydroxyesters of rapamycin useful as immunosuppressants but also
`useful in the treatment of diseases including adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma and
`solid tumors, see page 1 lines 7 and 8. See also page 2 where "anti-tumor" use is
`indicated. Further test data is available to illustrate anti-tumor use (vide infra). A
`compound claimed in this application is undergoing clinical trials as an anti-tumor
`agent.
`
`4.2
`It is noted that D2 is considered the closest prior art. The Examining Division
`also comments that Dl - D4 are all relevant because they appear to be prodrugs of
`rapamycin. This statement is disputed in so far as D2 - D4 are concerned since it
`implies that the side chain is lost during metabolism to give rapamycin which is the
`active entity responsible for the pharmacological effect. However no evidence is
`provided by the Examining Division to show whether or not the compounds of these
`references are prodrugs of rapamycin.
`It appears to be an assumption made by the
`
`John Wyeth & Brother L1m1ted
`Registered 1n England No 135937
`Registered Office. Huntercombe Lane South
`Taplow, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 0PH
`
`I\"\'ESTOR IN PEOPLE
`
`Incorporating Wyeth Laboratories
`SMA Nutrition
`
`

`

`/ '✓
`
`. • •
`•
`•
`• • • •
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`• • ••••
`•
`••
`••
`•
`• •
`•
`•
`• •
`•
`• • ••
`•
`• •
`• • •
`• •
`•
`• •
`•
`•
`•
`•
`••• ••
`• • •••
`
`• •
`••
`•
`• •
`•
`• •
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`= •• :))
`• •
`
`-2-
`
`Examining Division which insofar as the present compounds are concerned is
`The Applicants consider that the activity in the present compounds
`incorrect.
`resides in the compounds themselves and they do not require conversion to
`rapamycin to exert their biological activity.
`
`•
`
`4.3-5 The Examining Division comments that the compounds disclosed in D2-D4 all
`have qualitatively the same activity. This is not correct in that the compounds of the
`present application have an additional and important activity as anti tumor agents -
`see page 1 line 8 which is substantiated by data included hereinbelow.
`
`The Examining Division appears to suggest that the presence of an inventive step
`could be acknowledged if it is made credible by test results that another problem has
`been solved.
`It appears also that we are required to provide a comparison with the
`closest prior art compound of D2, viz. rapamycin 42-mono-methylsuccinate.
`
`It is pointed out firstly that none of the prior art documents D2-D4 teach anti(cid:173)
`tumor activity. Secondly the Table below demonstrates highly significant anti tumor
`test data for the compound of Example 11 (rapamycin 42-ester with 2,2-bis(cid:173)
`(hydroxymethyl)propionic acid). Since the closest prior art makes no reference to
`anti-tumor activity it is submitted that there is no need to make a comparison.
`
`TABLE
`
`•
`
`Inhibition of growth of human tumor cell lines (in vitro) by
`compound of Example 11
`Tumor type
`Cell line
`Breast Cancer
`BT-474
`SK-BR-3
`MCF7
`Prostate Cancer PC-3
`LNCaP
`DU 145
`LOX
`Melanoma
`Ovarian Cancer A2780 S
`A2780DDP
`HTB 161
`A549
`LX-1
`CaCo2
`HCT-15
`SW948
`MIP 101
`CX-1
`SW620
`
`Lung Cancer
`
`Colon Cancer
`
`ICSQ (gM)"
`0.0006
`0.0007
`0.001
`0.0005
`0.0007
`0.001
`0.001
`0.004
`0.04
`0.07
`0.1
`2.5
`0.004
`0.07
`0.05
`0.08
`4.4
`4.4
`
`

`

`• •• . •
`• •• • • • •
`• • •
`
`• •• • • • • ••
`
`• •
`• • ••••
`•
`•
`•
`• •
`• •
`•
`• • ••
`•
`• • •
`• •
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`••
`• • •••
`
`• •
`••
`• •
`•
`•
`• •
`•
`•
`• •
`•
`•
`•
`••
`
`• • ··· s,
`
`-3-
`
`4.8
`COLO 205
`LS 174T
`4.9
`SW480
`5.9
`0.1
`CCRF-CEM
`5.8
`HL-60
`a: IC50 = concentration causing 50% growth inhibition.
`
`Leukemia
`
`Based on the teaching in the application as filed and the data provided herein it is
`submitted that the compounds of the present application do possess an inventive
`step over the prior art being indicated as anti-tumor agents.
`
`The Examining Division has objected to the breadth of scope. Enclosed
`4.6
`herewith are replacement claims which more narrowly define the invention and are
`based on the original specification as filed.
`In particular the features of claim 4 have
`been introduced into claim 1. 42,31-Bis compounds are removed.
`
`The Examining Division has objected to Claim 1 for being unclear due to the
`presence of two provisos. Restriction of Claim 1 to the features of Claim 4 has
`resulted in one proviso being removed and the other being simplified. The use of the
`one proviso is regarded as clear and the meaning is readily comprehensible.
`
`Claim 12 (new claim 11) has been amended to remove functional language.
`The term "reactive derivative" however has been retained since its meaning is readily
`clear from the description on page 5 lines 26 to 30. Those skilled in the art would be
`aware of how to perform an acylation reaction and what the term means.
`
`The Applicants propose to bring the description into line once the claims have
`5.
`been agreed.
`
`A new claim 3 has been added to the claims directed to first pharmaceutical use. A
`second medical use claim has been added as new claim 9 directed to anti tumor
`treatment.
`
`These amendments are made without prejudice to reinstatement of the original
`wording during future prosecution of this application or any application derived
`therefrom, and without prejudice to filing of divisional applications.
`
`,.,,
`
`j
`
`- -
`
`

`

`,
`
`. • •
`•
`•
`•• ••
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`-4-
`
`D
`
`D
`D
`D
`
`••
`
`••
`• • ••••
`• •
`•
`•
`•
`••
`• •••
`•
`•
`•
`• • •
`• •
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`• •• ••
`• • •••
`
`••
`• •
`•
`• •
`•
`• •
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`••
`
`• = .. =<;r
`
`The Applicant requests Oral Proceedings (Article 116 EPC) before any notice of
`rejection may issue.
`
`A form 1037 accompanies the confirmatory copy of the fax for acknowledging
`receipt.
`
`Yours faithfully
`
`c;j)(J~
`
`-
`
`Dr D F Wileman
`European Patent Attorney (GA 2141)
`
`-
`
`

`

`,
`
`r
`.,
`I
`
`•
`
`• 0
`0
`0
`0
`e De
`
`•
`
`•
`•
`
`•
`•
`• • • •
`• • •
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`- 20 -
`
`CLAIMS
`
`1.
`
`A compound of the structure
`
`••
`
`•
`• •
`•
`•
`
`• e
`
`•
`
`• • • • • •
`• •
`• •
`! Alfl>~CJ3171 tPC:*f
`!
`
`= •• : ••• : • = •• : =--~i
`
`(I)
`
`Meo·······
`
`0
`
`OMe
`
`wherein RI is -COCR7R8R9 and R2 is H;
`R7 is hydrogen, alkyl of 1-6 carbon atoms, alkenyl of 2-7 carbon atoms, alkynyl of 2-7
`carbon atoms, -(CR3R4)tDR 10, -CF3, -F, or -C02R 11 ;
`R8 and R9 are each, independently, hydrogen, alkyl of 1-6 carbon atoms, or(cid:173)
`(CR3R4)tDR10; or R8 and R9 may be taken together to form X;
`R 10 is hydrogen, alkyl of 1-6 carbon atoms, alkenyl of 2-7 carbon atoms, alkynyl of 2-7
`carbon atoms, tri-(alkyl of 1-6 carbon atoms)silyl, tri-(alkyl of 1-6 carbon
`atoms)silylethyl, triphenylmethyl, benzyl, alkoxymethyl of 2-7 carbon atoms, tri(cid:173)
`(alkyl of 1-6 carbon atoms)silylethoxymethyl, chloroethyl, or tetrahydropyranyl;
`X is 5-(2,2-di-(alkyl of 1-6 carbon atoms))[l,3]dioxanyl, 5-(2-spiro(cycloalkyl of 3-8
`carbon atoms))[l,3]dioxanyl, 4-(2,2-di-(alkyl of 1-6 carbon atoms))[l,3]dioxanyl,
`4-(2-spiro(cycloalkyl of 3-8 carbon atoms))[l,3]dioxanyl, 4-(2,2-di-(alkyl of 1-6
`carbon
`atoms))[l ,3]dioxalanyl, or 4-(2-spiro(cycloalkyl of 3-8
`carbon
`atoms))[ 1,3 ]dioxalanyl;
`R3 and R4 are each, independently, hydrogen, alkyl of 1-6 carbon atoms, alkenyl of 2-7
`carbon atoms, alkynyl of 2-7 carbon atoms, trifluoromethyl, or -F;
`
`and
`f = 0-6
`with the proviso that RI contains at least one -(CR 3R4)tDR 10 or X group,
`or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
`
`

`

`·~
`
`-
`
`•
`•
`•• ••
`• • •
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`- 21 -
`
`•
`••
`•• •
`•
`• •
`•
`• •
`•
`• •
`•
`••• ••
`
`• •
`• •
`• • • • • •
`: 1~¾H)3171 BPC:*:"
`:
`. . . . .
`: • : : : =~0
`• : :
`. . . . ) \
`
`2.
`
`A compound according to claim 1 which is one of the following:
`
`rapamycin 42-ester with (tetrahydropyran-2-yloxy)acetic acid;
`
`rapamycin 42-ester with hydroxyacetic acid;
`
`rapamycin 42-ester with 2,2-dimethyl-3-(tetrahydropyran-2-yloxy)propionic acid;
`
`rapamycin 42-ester with 3-hydroxy-2,2-dimethylpropionic acid;
`
`rapamycin 42-ester with 2,2-dimethyl[ 1,3 ]dioxalane-4-carboxylic acid;
`
`rapamycin 42-ester with 2,3-dihydroxypropionic acid;
`
`rapamycin 42-ester with 2,2-d1methyl[l,3]dioxane-5-carboxylic acid;
`
`rapamycin 42-ester with 3-hydroxy-2-hydroxymethylpropionic acid;
`
`rapamycin 42-ester with 2,2,5-trimethyl[l ,3]dioxane-5-carboxylic acid;
`
`rapamycin 42-ester with 2,2-bis-(hydroxymethyl)propionic acid;
`
`rapamyci n 42-ester with 2,2-dimethy 1-5-(2-trimethylsilanylethoxymethyl)[ 1,3 ]-dioxane-
`5-carboxy lic acid;
`
`or
`
`rapamycin 42-ester with 3-methyl-1,5-dioxa-spiro[5.5]undecane 3-carboxylic acid;
`
`or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
`
`3.
`
`A compound of formula I as claimed in Claim 1 for use as a pharmaceutical.
`
`Use of a compound of formula I as claimed in Claim 1 in the preparation of a
`4.
`medicament for treating transplantation rejection or graft vs. host disease in a mammal.
`
`

`

`.,
`
`-
`
`•
`•
`•• ••
`• • •
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`- 22 -
`
`••
`•
`•• •
`•
`••
`•
`• •
`• •
`• •
`•
`••• ••
`
`• • • • • •
`• •
`• •
`: ~-CEH>3171 ~P<:"!"
`:
`
`: .. : ... : . : .. : : .. :G/7
`
`Use of a compound of formula I as claimed in Claim 1 in the preparation of a
`5.
`medicament for treating a fungal infection in a mammal.
`
`Use of a compound of formula I as claimed in Claim 1 in the preparation of a
`6.
`medicament for treating rheumatoid arthritis in a mammal.
`
`Use of a compound of formula I as claimed in Claim l in the preparation of a
`7.
`medicament for treating restenosis in a mammal.
`
`Use of a compound of formula I as claimed in Claim 1 in the preparation of a
`8.
`medicament for treating pulmonary inflammation in a mammal.
`
`Use of a compound of formula I as claimed in Claim 1 in the preparation of a
`9.
`medicament for treating tumors in a mammal.
`
`A pharmaceutical composition which comprises a compound of the structure (I)
`10.
`as claimed in Claim 1 or claim 2 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, and a
`pharmaceutical carrier.
`
`A process for preparing a hydroxy ester of rapamycin of formula I as defined in
`11.
`Claim 1 which comprises acylating rapamycin with an acylating agent of formula
`
`HO-COCR7R8R9
`(II)
`
`or a reactive derivative thereof wherein R7-R9are as defined in Claim 1 providing that
`free hydroxy groups are protected and after the reaction removing any protecting groups
`present as required.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket