throbber
Downloaded from
`
`http://science.sciencemag.org/
`
`
`
`on June 13, 2018
`
`-
`
`15. C. Meyers and L. A. Laimins, unpublished material.
`16. A. E. G. Dunn and M. M. OgiMe, J. Ultrastruct.
`Res. 22, 282 (1968); C.R. Laverty, P. Russell, E.
`Hills, N. Booth, Acta Cytol. 22, 195 (1978); C.
`Morin and A. Meisels, ibid. 24, 82 (1980); J. Viac,
`D. Schmitt, J. Thivolet, J. Invest. Dermatol. 70, 263
`(1978); S. Pilotti, F. Rilke, G. De Palo, G. Della
`Torre, L. AJasio, J. C/in. Pathol. 34, 532 (1981).
`17. M. Favre, F. Breitburd, 0. Croissant, G. Orth, J.
`Viral. 15, 1239 (1975).
`18. D. H. Crawford and I. Ando, Immunology 59,405
`(1986); A. H. Davies, R. J. A. Grand, F. J. Evans,
`A. B. Rickinson, J. Viral. 65, 6838 (1991); a. X. Li
`et al., Nature 356, 347 (1992).
`19. S. J. Polyak, W. E. Rawls, D. G. Hamish, J. Virol.
`65, 3575 (1991).
`20. R. M. Lewis, J. C. Morrill, P. 8. Jahrting, T. M.
`Cosgriff, Rev. Infect. Dis. 11, 736 (1989).
`21. B. G. Weinshenker, S. Wilton, G. P. A. Rice, J.
`lmmunol. 140, 1626 (1988).
`22. B. R. Cullen and W. C. Greene, Cell 58, 423
`(1989); J. Laurence, H. Cooke, S. K. Sikder, Blood
`75, 696 (1990).
`23. C. Meyers and L. A. Laimins, in preparation.
`24. D. J. McCance, R. Kopan, E. Fuchs, L.A. Laimins,
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 7169 (1988).
`25. We thank M. Turyk, G. Wilbanks, P. Larramendi, and
`S. Chou for assistance with electron microscopy, B.
`Roizman and S. Silverstein for critical reading of the
`manuscript, and the members of the L. Laimins
`laboratory for many helpful discussions. Supported
`by the Howard Hughes Medical lnstiMe and a grant
`from the American Cancer Society (L.A.L.).
`
`15 June 1992; accepted 15 July 1992
`
`R. J. Zaino, J. A. Weber, J. Viral. 61,590 (1987); J.
`W. Kreider, S. D. Patrick, N. M. Cladel, P. A.
`Welsh, Virology 1n, 415 (1990).
`4. J. Sterling, M. Stanley, G. Gatward, T. Minson, J.
`Viral. 64, 6305 (1990).
`5. L. B. Teichman and R. F. LaPorte, in (2), pp.
`109--140.
`6. C. M. Meyers and L.A. Laimins, Papil/ornavirus
`Rep. 3, 1 (1992).
`7. M.A. Bedell et al., J. Virol. 65, 2254 (1991).
`8. D. Asselineau, 8. A. Bernard, C. Bailly, D. Dar(cid:173)
`rnon, M. Prunieras, J. Invest. Dermatol. 86, 181
`(1986).
`9. R. Kopan, G. Traska, E. Fuchs, J. Cell Biol. 105,
`427 (1987).
`10. E. Fuchs and H. Green, Cell 19, 1033 (1980); R.
`Moll, W. W. Franke, D. L. Schiller, B. Geiger, R.
`Krepler, ibid. 31, 11 (1982); Y. J. Wu eta/., ibid., p.
`693; W. G. Nelson and T.-T. Sun, J. Cell Biol. 97,
`244 (1983).
`11. B. D. Ball, G. K. Walker, I. A. Bernstein, J. Biol.
`Chem. 253, 5861 (1978); B. A. Dale, K. A. Resing,
`J. D. Lonsdale-Eccles, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 455,
`330 (1985); 8. A. Dale, A. M. Gown, P. Fleckman,
`J. R. Kimball, K. A. Resing, J. Invest. Dermatol. 88,
`306 (1987).
`12. J. S. Rader et al., Oncogene 5, 571 (1990).
`13. Reproducible induction of differentiation occurred
`when raft cultures were incubated 16 to 24 hours
`every 4 days with cell culture medium that con(cid:173)
`tained 16 nM TPA. Raft cultures were grown for 16
`days then harvested, fixed in paraformaldehyde,
`embedded in paraffin, and sectioned for immuno(cid:173)
`histostaining (23).
`14. H. Pfister and P. G. Fuchs, in (1), pp. 1-18.
`
`Rapamycin-lnduced Inhibition of the
`70-Kilodalton 56 Protein Kinase
`Daniel J. Price,* J. Russell Grove,* Victor Calvo, Joseph Avruch,
`Barbara E. Bierert
`The immunosuppressant rapamycin inhibited proliferation of the H4IIEC hepatoma cell line.
`Aapamycin, but not its structural analog FK506, also inhibited the basal and insulin-stim(cid:173)
`ulated activity of the p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase. By contrast, insulin stimulation of the
`p85 Ask S6 kinase and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase activity were unaffected by
`drug. Aapamycin treatment of COS cells transfected with recombinant p70 S6 kinase
`completely inhibited the appearance of the hyperphosphorylated form of p70 S6 kinase
`concomitant with the inhibition of enzyme activity toward 40S subunits. Thus, rapamycin
`inhibits a signal transduction element that is necessary for the activation of p70 S6 kinase
`and mitogenesis but unnecessary for activation of p85 Ask S6 kinase or MAP kinase.
`
`Increased phosphorylation of multiple ser(cid:173)
`ine residues on the 40S ribosomal protein
`S6 numbers among the most rapid bio(cid:173)
`chemical responses exhibited by cells stim(cid:173)
`ulated with insulin or mitogens in vitro ( 1).
`Insulin or mitogen-stirnulated S6 phosphor-
`
`D. J. Price, J. R. Grove, J. Avruch, Diabetes Unit and
`Medical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital,
`Boston, MA, and Department of Medicine, Harvard
`Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
`V. Calvo, Division of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber
`Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston,
`MA02115.
`B. E. Bierer, Division of Pediatric Oncology, Dana(cid:173)
`Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Hematology-On(cid:173)
`cology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and
`Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Department of
`Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
`*The first two authors contributed equally.
`tTo whom correspondence should be addressed.
`
`SCIENCE • VOL. 257
`
`• 14 AUGUST 1992
`
`ylation is catalyzed by one or both of two
`families of insulin or mitogen-activated S6
`Ser-Thr protein kinases--the Rsk or p85
`Rsk S6 kinases (2), and the p70 S6 kinases
`(3, 4). Both families of S6 kinases are
`themselves regulated by Ser-Thr phos(cid:173)
`phorylation, although the immediate up(cid:173)
`stream regulators of the two S6 kinase
`families differ, at least in part. The Xeno(cid:173)
`pus S6 kinase II, a p85 Rsk enzyme, is
`activated in vitro by phosphorylation with
`p42 MAP kinase (5). The MAP kinases
`are the dominant (perhaps only} immedi(cid:173)
`ate upstream activator of the p85 Rsk
`enzyme in situ in response to insulin or
`mitogens (6). Although the MAP kinases
`and cdc2 phosphorylate recombinant p70
`S6 kinase in vitro in a putative regulatory
`
`973
`
`termine if the structures we observed in nuclei
`of CIN-612 cells were indeed virions. Dot
`blot hybridization was performed on fractions
`from an isopycnic gradient purification ( 17) of
`HPV 3 lb virions produced in raft culture, and
`the presence of viral DNA was confirmed by
`Southern (DNA) blot hybridization (Fig.
`4A). Lanes 6, 7, and 8 of Fig. 4A demon(cid:173)
`strate the presence of HPV 3 lb DNA at low
`levels. From the copy number standards, we
`estimate the yield of viral particles to be at
`least 40 million per milliliter in lanes 7 and 8
`(Fig. 4A). Fractions positive for HPV 31b
`DNA contained viral particles (Fig. 4B). The
`density gradient in fractions where virions
`were found was between 1.3 and 1 .4 g/cm.3 as
`determined by weight. The presence of both
`HPV DNA and viral particles within the
`same fractions suggests that these are com(cid:173)
`plete HPV virions, not empty capsids.
`The ability to propagate papillomavirus in
`vitro is valuable not only for the understand(cid:173)
`ing of the virus, but also for the eventual
`development of anti-viral treatments and the
`prevention of papillomavirus-induced lesions.
`These studies also establish the tight link
`between epithelial differentiation and HPV
`virion production. The ability of TP A to
`induce an increased expression of differentia(cid:173)
`tion-specific markers suggests that a signal
`transduction pathway of epithelial differenti(cid:173)
`ation has been identified. Virion production
`induced by phorbol esters has been described
`in other systems such as Epstein-Barr virus
`(18), Pichinde virus (19), Rift Valley fever
`virus (20), cytomegalovirus (21), and human
`immunodeficiency virus (22). The induction
`of the complete vegetative life cycle of HPV s
`in vitro requires both stratification at an air(cid:173)
`liquid interface and protein kinase C (PKC)
`activation. In support of this hypothesis, the
`induction of viral particle biosynthesis by the
`addition of the synthetic diacylglycerol 1,2-
`dioctanoyl-sn-glycerol was observed (23). We
`believe that PKC activation of papillomavirus
`production is dependent on the induction of a
`more complex keratinocyte differentiation
`program and is not just a direct effect on
`capsid synthesis.
`In this report, we described a system
`whereby latent infection of keratinocytes is
`converted into a productive infection lead(cid:173)
`ing to the formation of papillomavirus vir(cid:173)
`ions in culture. This tissue culture system
`will be useful in studies of the mechanisms
`whereby latency is maintained and termi(cid:173)
`nated, and in the synthesis and assembly of
`papillomavirus virions.
`
`REFERENCES AND NOTES
`
`1. K. Syrjiinen, L. Gissman, L. G. Koss, Eds., Papil(cid:173)
`lomaviruses and Human Disease (Springer-Ver(cid:173)
`lag, Bertin, 1987).
`2. N. P. Salzman and P. M. Howley, Eds., The
`Papil/omaviruses, vol. 2 of The Papovaviridae
`(Plenum, New York, 1987).
`3. J. W. Kreider, M. K. Howett, A. E. Leure-Dupree,
`
`

`

`200
`
`120
`
`I 160
`0
`"b
`C
`!
`:§
`
`80
`
`0
`
`0.01 0.1
`1
`Rapamycln (nM)
`
`E t !c
`40 ~ 'e..
`10 100 ~ I ~
`I
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`D
`
`D
`
`C
`
`Fig. 1. Rapamycin-mediated inhibition of basal
`((cid:143)) and insulin-stimulated (e) proliferation of H4
`rat hepatoma cells. Cells were grown to near-
`confluence in Swims S77 medium (Sigma) with
`fetal calf serum (5%) and horse serum (15%) at
`37°C, 5% CO2 . Cells were cultured in serum-free
`medium 18 to 24 hours before assay. Serum-
`starved H4 cells were cultured in 96-well, flat-
`bottom plates (4 x 104 cells per well) in the
`absence ((cid:143)) or presence (e) of 10-5 M insulin.
`CsA (100 nM), FK506 (100 nM), and rapamycin
`(as indicated) were added at the start of the
`assay. Proliferation was assessed by the incor-
`poration of [3H]thymidine during 16 hours after a
`32-hour incubation. Mean ± SEM of triplicate
`determinations is shown, and this experiment is
`representative of four experiments.
`
`cells at the G 1 to S phase of the cell cycle ( 10,
`11). The molecular target of rapamycin action
`has not been defined. We now demonstrate
`that the signal transduction pathway leading
`to the activation of p 70 S6 kinase is selective(cid:173)
`ly inhibited by rapamycin.
`Rapamycin selectively inhibited the in(cid:173)
`corporation of [3H]-labeled thymidine into
`serum-starved H4 hepatoma cells in a con(cid:173)
`centration-dependent fashion both in the
`presence of ICso, half-maximal inhibitory
`concentration, of -0.1 nM and absence of
`-0.5 nM of the mitogen insulin (Fig. 1).
`Neither FK506 nor CsA, at 100-fold greater
`concentrations than those effective for
`rapamycin, inhibited basal or insulin-stim(cid:173)
`ulated H4 proliferation (Fig. 1).
`To analyze the rapamycin-mediated inhi(cid:173)
`bition of H4 proliferation, we examined early
`biochemical events in insulin signal transduc(cid:173)
`tion. Insulin treatment of serum-starved H4
`rat hepatoma cells results in the activation of
`cytosolic S6 protein kinases; assays of H4
`cytosolic extracts showed a progressive in(cid:173)
`crease in total S6 kinase to a plateau at 10 min
`that was sustained thereafter for at least 1 hour
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://science.sciencemag.org/
`
`
`
`on June 13, 2018
`
`domain (7), this phosphorylation is not
`sufficient to activate the p70 S6 kinase,
`indicating the existence of other, as yet
`unidentified, insulin-mitogen-activated p70
`kinase-kinases (7).
`The macrolide immunosuppressant rapa(cid:173)
`mycin and its structural analog FK506 bind
`to the same family of intracellular receptors,
`termed FK506 binding proteins (FKBPs) (8).
`
`The complex of FK506 with FKBP binds
`to and inhibits the activity of calcineurin,
`a calcium-calmodulin-dependent Ser-Thr
`phosphatase (9). FK506, like the undecapep(cid:173)
`tide immunosuppressive agent cyclosporin A
`(CsA), inhibits T cell receptor-mediated
`events leading to lymphokine gene transcrip(cid:173)
`tion (JO). Rapamycin, but not FK506, inhib(cid:173)
`its
`lymphokine-dependent proliferation of
`
`A
`
`+
`
`p851 - - - _,. _______ _
`
`- • ••--~s6
`
`B
`
`·1r•l•
`
`1 D
`
`so
`
`I
`
`No substrate
`
`Rap•~:cl '" (•Ml 0
`
`'
`
`1
`
`5
`
`I 10
`
`50
`
`No substrate
`
`.... -.... I
`
`+ +
`
`+
`
`31 ·.
`
`_
`
`. . . , . . . 4 . .....
`
`Fig. 2. Effect of rapamycin
`on insulin-regulated protein
`kinases in H4 hepatoma
`(A) Serum-starved
`cells.
`(24 hours) H4 cells were
`incubated in the presence
`or the absence of 20 nM
`raparnycin for 30 min be(cid:173)
`fore the addition of insulin
`(10-6 M). At the indicated
`times, cytosolic extracts
`were prepared. Aliquots of
`total extract (20) (top pan(cid:173)
`el), extracts immunoprecip(cid:173)
`itated with affinity-purified
`polyclonal antibody to a
`peptide derived from p 70
`S6 kinase (14)
`(second
`panel), or p85 Ask S6 ki-
`nase (third panel), were as(cid:173)
`sayed for S6 kinase activity
`with 40S ribosomes as sub(cid:173)
`strate. Bottom panel, pro(cid:173)
`teins from H4 cell extracts
`Western-blotted with an an(cid:173)
`tibody to phosphotyrosine.
`The region containing IRS-1
`(P180) is shown. (B) Rapa(cid:173)
`rnycin-mediated inhibition of
`basal and insulin-stimulated
`S6 kinase actMty. Rapa-
`mycin (0 to 250 nm) was
`added to serum-starved H4 cells 1 hour before harvest. Thirty minutes before
`harvest, the cells were either treated with insulin (10-5 M) or left untreated.
`Cells were harvested (20), and the kinase actMty of cytosolic extracts
`detected as phosphorylation of 40S ribosomes (7, 12). (C) Effect of rapa(cid:173)
`mycin on incorporation of 32P into ribosomal protein S6 in intact H4 cells.
`Serum-starved (24 hours) H4 cells were incubated with serum-free medium
`containing 0.5 mCi of 32P; per 10-cm plate; after 1 hour, rapamycin (0 to 80
`nm) was added. One hour later, insulin (10-5 M) was added to half of the
`plates. The cells were harvested 30 min later in extraction buffer (20) without
`Triton X-100, with aprotinin (10 U/ml) (0.5 ml per plate), and homogenized
`
`C
`
`Rapamyd, (:Lr------=---=-__J
`
`D
`a
`
`£ =~ ~e 1.0
`i: ::: :st 0.5
`.,
`.,
`if :ll e 40
`(/) !-!~ {20
`(/) - 0
`
`0.0
`
`'ti
`Q.
`
`:: 60
`C
`
`No rapamycin
`
`Rapamycin
`
`C
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`20
`Fraction number
`
`40
`
`60
`
`and centrifuged (10 min, 1000g). After further centrifugation (1.5 hours, 2
`x 105g), sedimented material was subjected to SOS-PAGE. 32P-labeled
`S6 is indicated by the arrow. (D) MonoQ chromatography of extracts from
`insulin-treated H4 cells. Serum-starved (24 hours) H4 cells were incubat(cid:173)
`ed in the absence (a and c) or the presence (b and d) of rapamycin (20
`nM). After 30 min, insulin (10-5 M) was added to all plates. Cells were
`harvested 30 min thereafter into extraction buffer (20) without Triton
`X-100. Cytosolic extracts were chromatographed on a column (23).
`Fractions (fr) (1 ml) were assayed for kinase activities toward 40S
`ribosomes (a and b) and SKAIPS peptide (c and d) (4, 7).
`
`974
`
`SCIENCE • VOL. 257
`
`• 14 AUGUST 1992
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://science.sciencemag.org/
`
`
`
`on June 13, 2018
`
`(Fig. 2A) (12). Incubation of H4 cells with
`rapamycin for 1 hour before addition of insu(cid:173)
`lin led to a dose-dependent inhibition of both
`basal and insulin-stimulated S6 kinase activity
`in the cytosolic extract that was essentially
`complete at 10 nM rapamycin (Fig. 2B). The
`rapamycin inhibition of cytosolic S6 kinase
`activity of H4 cells was accompanied by an
`inhibition of basal and insulin-stimulated
`phosphorylation of the ribosomal protein S6
`in situ (Fig. 2C).
`To determine whether the inhibition of
`total S6 kinase activity by rapamycin was a
`consequence of the inhibition of p70 or p85
`Rsk S6 kinase, or both, we resolved cyto(cid:173)
`solic extracts by anion-exchange chroma(cid:173)
`tography (Figs. 2D and 3A) and by immu(cid:173)
`noprecipitation (Fig. 2A). H4 cytosolic
`extracts contain a dominant peak of S6
`kinase activity that was eluted from a
`MonoQ anion-exchange column near 0.25
`M NaCl (Fig. 2D) . This peak corresponds
`to the p70 S6 kinase (13), and recombinant
`p70 S6 kinase expressed in COS cells ex(cid:173)
`hibits similar elution (14). This peak of S6
`kinase activity was completely inhibited by
`rapamycin pretreatment (Fig. 2D). Rapa(cid:173)
`mycin also caused loss of S6 kinase activity
`in immunoprecipitates prepared with anti(cid:173)
`bodies to a peptide from the p70 S6 kinase
`(Fig. 2A) . The p85 Rsk S6 kinase, which
`elutes from MonoQ between 0.05 and 0.1
`M NaCl (Fig. 3A), contributes less than
`5% of the total cytosolic S6 kinase activity
`in H4 cells (Fig. 2D). We examined the
`activity of p85 S6 kinase by immunoprecip(cid:173)
`itation with an antibody to a peptide from
`the p85 Rsk kinase protein; p85 Rsk S6
`kinase underwent activation in response to
`insulin, peaking in activity at 10 min (Fig.
`2A). Concentrations of rapamycin that
`caused maximal inhibition of mitogenesis
`(Fig. 1) and total inhibition of p70 S6
`kinase activity (Fig. 28) did not alter the
`time course or magnitude of the insulin
`activation of p85 Rsk S6 kinase (Fig. 2A).
`We 'further evaluated the differential sen(cid:173)
`sitivity of the p70 and p85 Rsk S6 kinases to
`inhibition by rapamycin by directly examin(cid:173)
`ing the activity of the recombinant S6 ki(cid:173)
`nase expressed transiently in COS cells.
`COS cells endogenously expressed both p85
`and p 70 S6 kinase activities, which were
`separable by MonoQ anion-exchange chro(cid:173)
`matography and independently regulated
`(Fig. 3A). Active phorbol esters (Fig. JA),
`serum, or epidermal growth factor (EGF),
`but not insulin, each stimulated the activity
`associated with the p85 Rsk kinase, but did
`not alter the activity of the p70 S6 kinase
`(15). The endogenous MAP kinase activity
`in COS cells was increased by the same
`stimuli that increased p85 Rsk S6 kinase
`activity (15) . Recombinant epitope-tagged
`(r-epi) (16) versions of p70 S6 kinase, p85
`Rsk S6 kinase, and rat p44 MAP kinase
`
`C
`
`t 1.0
`
`c 0.8
`111-
`0, E
`! in 0.6
`~:;;
`10 o 0.4
`Ill E
`~ S: 0.2
`a.
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2
`
`10
`
`0
`
`20
`
`8.0
`
`f I 6.0
`
`GIil)
`
`:l:;; 4.0
`C: 0
`S2 E
`11., S, 2.0
`m :.
`
`0.218
`0
`0.1 'a_
`
`8
`6
`4
`2
`Rapamycln (nM)
`
`10 FK506
`200nM
`
`~
`c e
`"' 5
`0.5 _§,
`0.4: ..
`
`0.3i1
`
`0
`
`4A
`
`~ 3
`
`-~-li .2 = i 2
`
`as ...
`C: -S2 :5
`
`10
`(/)
`
`B
`
`0.4
`
`0.3 ~
`0
`0.2 ~
`
`0.1
`
`5
`
`15
`10
`Fraction number
`
`a nl~~t!1
`
`vector p44
`p85
`p70
`DNA transfected
`
`:.
`
`D
`
`0
`
`1
`.1
`Rapamycin (nM)
`
`! ::,
`Recombinant p70
`m
`Vector
`(n~M_l_l_o_ ~1_1_-'--_0_~1_0_.0_3--'-,_o_._1-'-,_o_.~3~,_1'--~•-3=--~' kD
`
`10
`
`Fig. 3. Rapamycin inhibi(cid:173)
`tion of recombinant p70
`S6 kinase. (A) COS-M6
`cells were deprived of
`serum overnight, were
`treated with phorbol myri(cid:173)
`state acetate (PMA, 0.1
`µ,M) or carrier for 15 min,
`and then were harvested
`in extraction buffer (20) .
`After ultracentrifugation,
`the supernatants were
`matched for protein con(cid:173)
`tent and were chromato(cid:173)
`graphed on MonoQ as in
`Fig . 20 . S6 kinase activity
`ribosomes
`toward 40S
`was measured (7, 12). (0 )
`Untreated cells, (e ) PMA(cid:173)
`treated cells. U = pico(cid:173)
`moles of 32P transferred to
`S6 per minute. (B) PMA
`and EGF regulation of re(cid:173)
`combinant p70 and p85 S6
`kinases and p44 erk-1
`(24) . COS
`MAP kinase
`cells were transfected with
`~ - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -~ - + 68
`vector only, with the epi(cid:173)
`tope-tagged S6 kinase expression constructs (r-epi p70 S6 kinase and r-epi p85 Rsk S6 kinase) or with
`the epitope-tagged p44 MAP kinase (r-epi erk-1) (24) . After 24 hours, cells were left untreated (solid
`bars) or treated with PMA (100 nM) for 15 min (open bars) or EGF (60 ng/ml) for 10 min (hatched bars),
`then were homogenized in extraction buffer (20) . Recombinant proteins were immunoprecipitated by
`incubation with the monoclonal antibody 12CA5 (22), and S6 kinase activity in the washed immunopre(cid:173)
`cipitates was determined (7, 12). The r-epi erk-1 activity was assayed similarly with myelin basic protein
`(MBP) as substrate. Error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3). (C) Recombinant p70 S6 kinase but
`not p85 S6 kinase or erk-1 is inhibited by rapamycin but not FK506. COS cells were transfected with r-epi
`p70 and r-epi p85 Rsk S6 kinase cDNAs (top panel) , or r-epi p70 S6 kinase and r-epi erk-1 cDNAs
`(bottom panel) ; 48 hours later, the indicated concentrations of rapamycin were added to each plate 15
`min before harvest. Recombinant proteins were immunoprecipitated and assayed for kinase activities as
`in Fig . 3B. Error bars indicate standard deviation (upper panel, n = 5; lower panel, n = 6) . (D)
`Dose-response of rapamycin inhibition of r-epi p70 S6 kinase activity toward 40S subunits (top panel)
`(mean± SD, n = 6) compared with r-epi p70 S6 kinase autophosphorylation (middle) . COS cells were
`transfected with r-epi p70 S6 kinase cDNA After 48 hours, rapamycin was added at the indicated
`concentrations. PMA (0.1 µ,M) was added 45 min later, and 15 min thereafter cells were extracted and
`were subjected to immunoprecipitation as in Fig . 3A Autophosphorylation (middle panel) was measured
`by omitting the 40S subunits in the S6 kinase assay. The autoradiograph (middle) exhibits the 32P
`incorporation into r-epi p70 polypeptide during a 15-min incubation with ['y-32P)-labeled adenosine
`triphosphate. Portions of each immunoprecipitation were subjected to SOS-PAGE, were blotted onto
`PVDF membranes, and were probed with anli-p70 S6 kinase peptide antibody (14) (lower panel).
`
`•
`
`Vector
`
`0 I 1 I
`
`(nM)
`
`Recombinant p70
`I 0.031 0 . 1 I 0.3 I 1
`
`0
`
`• • • • •
`
`+-117
`
`+-66
`
`3
`
`I • I~"
`
`SCIENCE
`
`• VOL. 257
`
`• 14 AUGUST 1992
`
`975
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://science.sciencemag.org/
`
`
`
`on June 13, 2018
`
`action in lymphoid cells is also likely to
`involve a ubiquitous signal transduction
`element shared with nonlymphoid lineages.
`The rapamycin target might be a proximate
`upstream activator of the p70 S6 kinase,
`such as an activating p 70 S6 kinase-kinase
`or a regulator of such an enzyme, and
`appears to be a crucial element linking
`growth factor receptors to subsequent intra(cid:173)
`cellular processes regulating proliferation.
`
`REFERENCES AND NOTES
`
`1. J. P. Gordon et al., Curr. Top. Cell. Regul. 21, 89
`(1982); R. L. Erikson, J. Biol. Chem. 266, 6007
`(1991).
`2. S. W. Jones et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85,
`3377 (1988); E. Erikson and J. L. Maller, J. Biol.
`Chem. 261, 350 (1986); D. A. Alcorta et al., Mo/.
`Cell. Biol. 9, 3850 (1989).
`3. P. Banerjee et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87,
`8550 (1990); S. C. Kozma et al., ibid., p. 7365; P.
`Jeno, L. M. Ballou, I. Novak-Hofer, G. Thomas,
`ibid. 85, 406 (1988).
`4. D. J. Price, R. A. Nemenoff, J. Avruch, J. Biol.
`Chem. 254, 13825 (1989).
`5. T. W. Sturgill, L. B. Ray, E. Erikson, J. L. Maller,
`Nature 334, 715 (1988).
`6. N. G. Ahn and E. Krebs, J. Biol. Chem. 265, 11495
`(1990); N. Gomez and P. Cohen, Nature 353,170
`(1991); J. Chung, S. L. Pelech, J. Blenis, Proc.
`Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 4981 (1988); C. B.
`Barrett, E. Erikson, J. L. Maller, J. Biol. Chem. 267,
`4408 (1992); J. R. Grove, D. J. Price, P. Banerjee,
`M. Ahmad, A. Balasubrarnanyam, J. Avruch, un(cid:173)
`published observations.
`7. D. J. Price, N. K. Mukhopadhyay, J. Avruch, J.
`Biol. Chem. 266, 16821 (1991); N. K. Mukhopadh(cid:173)
`yay et al., ibid. 267, 3325 (1992).
`8. S. Schreiber, Science 251,283 (1991).
`9. J. Liu et al., Ce/166, 807 (1991); D. F. Fruman, C.
`Klee, B. E. Bierer, S. J. Burakoff, Proc. Natl. Acad.
`Sci. U.S.A. 89, 3686 (1992).
`10. F. J. Dumont, W. Staruch, S. L. Koprak, M. R.
`Merlino, N. H. Segal, J. lmmunol. 144, 251 (1990);
`B. E. Bierer et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87,
`9231 (1990).
`11. S. M. Metcalf and F. M. Richards, Transplantation
`49, 798 (1990); J. E. Kay et al., Immunology 72,
`544 (1991).
`12. R. A. Nernenoff, J. R. Gunsalus, J. Avruch, Arch.
`Biochem. Biophys. 245, 196 (1986).
`13. D. J. Price, J. R. Gunsalus, J. Avruch, Proc. Natl.
`Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 7944 (1990).
`14. J. R. Grove eta/., Mo/. Cell. Biol.11, 2159 (1991).
`15. J. R. Grove, D. J. Price, B. E. Bierer, J. Avruch,
`unpublished data.
`16. M. F. White, R. Maron, C. R. Kahn, Nature 318,
`183 (1985); X. J. Sun et al., ibid. 352, 73 (1991).
`17. J. J. Siekierka, S. J. U. Ung, M. Poe, C. S. Lin, N.
`G. Sigal, ibid. 341, 755 (1989); M. H. Harding, A.
`Gala!, D. E. Uehling, S. L. Schreiber, ibid., p. 758;
`Y . .J. Jin, S. J. Burakoff, B. E. Bierer, J. Biol. Chem.
`26, 10942 (1992).
`18. Rapamycin failed to inhibit the total and Suc-1
`precipitable histone H1 kinase activity in H4 cells,
`further suggesting that cdc2 activity is unaffected
`by drug.
`19. V. Calvo, C. Crews, T. Vik, B. E. Bierer, Proc. Natl.
`Acad. Sci. U.S.A., in press.
`20. H4 hepatoma and COS cells were harvested by
`homogenization in an extraction buffer containing
`10 mM potassium phosphate (pH 6.5), 1 mM
`EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 10 mM MgCl2 , 2 mM dithio(cid:173)
`threitol (DTT), 1 mM vanadate, 50 mM p-glycero(cid:173)
`phosphate, Triton X-100(0.1%),211,M leupeptin, 2
`11,M pepstatin, 0.2 mM phenylrnethylsulfonyl fluo(cid:173)
`ride (PMSF). Extracts were centrifuged for 1.5
`hours at 2 x 105g and matched for protein
`content before chromatography or immunopre(cid:173)
`cipitation. Immune complexes bound to protein A
`Sepharose were washed three times in extraction
`buffer containing 0.25 M NaCl, and once in 20 mM
`
`(erk-1), expressed transiently in COS cells,
`exhibited similar regulatory behavior. The
`r-epi p85 Rsk S6 kinase and r-epi p44 MAP
`kinase were activated by treatment of cells
`with phorbol
`12-myristate
`13-acetate
`(PMA) or EGF, whereas the recombinant
`p70 S6 kinase was constitutively active, and
`the activity was not altered significantly by
`PMA, EGF (Fig. JB), or withdrawal or
`readdition of serum ( 15). Treatment of COS
`cells with rapamycin abolished the activity
`of r-epi p70 S6 kinase, whereas the basal
`(15) or PMA-stimulated activities of the
`r-epi p85 S6 kinase and an r-epi p44 MAP
`kinase were not affected by 10- to 20-fold
`higher concentrations of rapamycin (Fig.
`JC). Rapamycin treatment did not inhibit
`the expression or recovery of the r-epi p 70
`S6 kinase polypeptide (Fig. JD). Moreover,
`the inhibition of p70 S6 kinase activiry was
`specific for rapamycin; treatment of cells
`with a 100-fold higher concentration of
`FK506 failed to inhibit r-epi p70 S6 kinase
`activity (Fig. JC).
`The p70 S6 kinase is activated by phos(cid:173)
`phorylation at multiple Ser and Thr resi(cid:173)
`dues (13). Both the endogenous and recom(cid:173)
`binant p70 S6 kinase polypeptide expressed
`in COS cells appear as a ladder of polypep(cid:173)
`tide bands after SDS-polyacrylamide gel
`electrophoresis (PAGE), of which only
`those with the slowest mobility coelute on
`MonoQ chromatography with the active
`enzyme (14). The slowed mobility on SDS(cid:173)
`PAGE is abolished by treatment with pro(cid:173)
`tein phosphatase and reflects a phosphoryl(cid:173)
`ation-induced conformational change asso(cid:173)
`ciated with the active state. Although vir(cid:173)
`tually all recombinant p70 S6 kinase
`polypeptides contain 32P when isolated
`from 32P-labeled COS cells, only a minority
`show the highly retarded migration on
`SDS-PAGE seen with purified active rat
`liver p70 S6 kinase, and coelute with S6
`kinase activity. After an in vitro autophos(cid:173)
`phorylation reaction, this electrophoreti(cid:173)
`cally retarded fraction of p70 S6 kinase
`polypeptides appears as a highly phospho(cid:173)
`rylated species migrating more slowly than
`the bulk of p70 S6 kinase; the latter shows
`much lower incorporation of 32P relative to
`its abundance (Fig. JD). The inhibition of
`the p70 S6 kinase activity seen at increas(cid:173)
`ing concentrations of rapamycin was corre(cid:173)
`lated with the disappearance of the slowly
`migrating 32P-labeled band observed after
`the autophosphorylation reaction in vitro.
`By contrast, the in vitro autophosphoryla(cid:173)
`tion associated with the faster migrating p70
`polypeptide (Fig. JD) and the overall 32P
`incorporation occurring in situ into the fast(cid:173)
`er migrating p70 polypeptides, which are
`catalytically inactive toward 40S subunits,
`were only diminished at much higher con(cid:173)
`centrations of rapamycin ( 15). Thus, rapa(cid:173)
`mycin inhibition of p70 S6 kinase activity
`
`976
`
`toward S6 in 40S subunits is paralleled by
`the selective loss of autophosphorylating ac(cid:173)
`tivity associated with the fully active (slow(cid:173)
`est migrating) p70 S6 kinase species.
`This result could be explained if rapa(cid:173)
`mycin, alone or as a complex with an FKBP,
`bound to and inhibited only the active
`conformation of p70 S6 kinase or prevented
`the accumulation of the active conformation
`of p70 S6 kinase by preventing its activation
`or accelerating its dephosphorylation. The
`effect of rapamycin, alone and as a complex
`with FKBP12 (17), an FKBP known to bind
`rapamycin with high affinity (8), on the
`activity of purified, fully active rat liver p 70
`S6 kinase (4, 14) was examined in vitro.
`Rapamycin ( 40 nM), added either alone or
`after prebinding to an equimolar concentra(cid:173)
`tion of recombinant FKBP12, did not alter
`p70 S6 kinase activity, or the rate at which
`rat liver p 70 S6 kinase was inactivated by
`phosphatase-2A (15). The lack of direct
`inhibition of active p70 S6 kinase by rapa(cid:173)
`mycin and FKBP12 suggests either that an(cid:173)
`other FKBP is required for rapamycin activ(cid:173)
`ity or that rapamycin inhibits p70 S6 kinase
`indirectly, by inhibiting an upstream activa(cid:173)
`tor that is also crucial for mitogenesis.
`The mechanism by which insulin medi(cid:173)
`ates activation of cytosolic p70 S6 kinase is
`incompletely understood. Intrinsic tyrosine
`kinase activity of the insulin receptor re(cid:173)
`sults in tyrosine phosphorylation of a 180-
`kD polypeptide substrate termed IRS-1
`(16). Insulin-stimulated tyrosine phospho(cid:173)
`rylation ofIRS-1 in H4 cells was not altered
`by concentrations of rapamycin that abol(cid:173)
`ished p70 S6 kinase activity (Fig. 28).
`Insulin activates an array of proline-direct(cid:173)
`ed protein kinases in H4 hepatoma cells,
`including MAP kinases and a form of cdc2
`that phosphorylate a putative regulatory
`domain on intact p 70 S6 kinase (3, 7). The
`activation of these enzymes can be moni(cid:173)
`tored with a synthetic polypeptide sub(cid:173)
`strate, S.KAIPS peptide, corresponding to
`these Ser Pro/Thr Pro-rich p 70 S6 kinase
`regulatory sequences (7). Rapamycin, at
`concentrations that completely inhibit ac(cid:173)
`tivation of p70 S6 kinase, did not alter the
`activation of these SKAIPS peptide kinases
`in response to insulin (Fig. 2D), indicating
`that MAP kinase and cdc2 activities are
`unaffected by drug ( 18). Thus, the target
`for rapamycin appears to be situated down(cid:173)
`stream of the insulin receptor kinase and
`tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 on a
`signal transduction pathway distinct from
`that mediating activation of the erk-1/erk-2
`MAP kinases. In the interleukin-2-depen(cid:173)
`dent CTLL-20 cell line, interleukin-2 stim(cid:173)
`ulates, and rapamycin inhibits, S6 kinase
`activity, whereas the PMA-stimulated ac(cid:173)
`tivities of p85 Rsk S6 kinases and p42 MAP
`kinases are not inhibited by rapamycin
`(19). Thus, the mechanism of rapamycin
`
`SCIENCE • VOL. 257
`
`• 14 AUGUST 1992
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://science.sciencemag.org/
`
`
`
`on June 13, 2018
`
`-
`
`(Fig. IA), as would be expected if the
`agonist were opening inwardly rectifying
`K+ channels (9). Somatostatin (100 nM)
`increased this current by two- to tenfold in
`all mock-transfected cells and in cells trans(cid:173)
`fected with the WT «zAR or Asn 79 «zAR
`(Fig. 1, B through E). Maximally effective
`concentrations of UK 14 304 or clonidine
`produced a 1.5- to 8-fold increase in K+
`current in cells expressing the WT a 2AR
`(Fig. I, B through D). Concentrations of
`clonidine and UK 14304 that produced
`half-maximal activation {EC5o) of the K+
`current were 14 and 30 nM, respectively, in
`cells expressing the WT a 2AR {Fig. 2A);
`these are similar to the EC50 values for the
`inwardly rectifying K+ conductance acti(cid:173)
`vated by pharmacologically characterized
`a 2AARs in autonomic enteric and central
`locus coeruleus neurons ( 10). The actions
`of maximally effective concentrations of
`somatostatin and AR agonists were not
`additive {n = 22), which is evidence that
`the transfected WT a 2AR couples to the
`same set of K+ channels as does the endog(cid:173)
`enous somatostatin receptor. In contrast to
`the WT a 2AR, the mutant Asn 79 a 2AR did
`not activate K+ currents (Fig. 1, B, C, and
`E), even in the presence of 10,000-fold
`higher concentrations of clonidine or U

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket