throbber
Spontaneous Regression of Metastases of Renal Cancer:
`
`A Report of Two Cases Including the First Recorded Regression Following
`Irradiation of a Dominant Metastasis and Review of the World Literature
`
`D. J. FAIRLAMB, MB, DMRT, FRCR
`
`Two cases of spontaneous regression of lung metastases are presented. One is the first report of re-
`gression of metastases after irradiation of a dominant metastasis. The world literature is reviewed, and
`67 documented cases have been found including the two now reported. Attention is drawn to the use of
`immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced renal cancer.
`Cancer 47:2102-2106, 1981.
`
`S event. In a review of the world literature from
`
`POM A N E O U S REc;RFssioK OF I UMORS is a rare
`
`1900- 1966, Everson and Cole" found only 176 cases.
`The tumors most commonly exhibiting this phenom-
`enon were hypernephroma (3 1 ), neuroblastoma (29).
`malignant melanoma (191, and chorioncarcinoma ( 19).
`Complete tumor disappearance in these patients was
`not always seen, and the duration of "remissions" was
`variable: over five years, 40%: two t o five years, 23% ;
`one to two years, 17%: and less than one year, 20%.
`In subsequent analysis of the same patients, Cole8 re-
`corded only three cases of spontaneous regression of
`other metastases following irradiation of a metas-
`tumors were choriocarcinomata, and the
`tasis-two
`other was a malignant melanoma.
`
`nbnormality. Her anemia rcsponded to oral administration of
`iron on both occasions.
`In March 1975, she was admitted for further investigation,
`since her symptoms and anemia had recurred. On this oc-
`casion. clinical examination revealed a left-sided, abdominal
`mass and a painless mass in the left groin measuring 7
`cm x 4 cm. Hemoglobin level was 7.6 g/dl: ESR was 100
`mmihr; electrolytes and liver function tests showed no ab-
`normality: a chest x-ray showed hilar enlargement and small
`pulmonary secondary deposits: and an IVP revealed a mass
`arising from the lower pole of the left kidney, and destruction
`of the left inferior pubic ramus was seen on a pelvic x-ray.
`Tumor circulation corresponding to the groin mass and to the
`area of pubic bone destruction was shown by femoral
`arteriography .
`A left nephrectomy was performed in May 1975, and the
`histology was that of a clear cell carcinoma of the kidney. She
`made an uneventful recovery, but when reviewed a month
`later, the groin mass measured 9 cm x 6 cm and was painful.
`Chest x-ray showed progression of the pulmonary metastases.
`The groin m a s was irradiated by cobalt teletherapy with
`opposed fields receiving 40 Gy (4000 rads) in 15 fractions over
`30 days. N o further treatment was given since she was
`asymptomatic. Successive chest x-rays showed resolution
`and eventual disappearance of the pulmonary deposits by
`August 1976. She remained well until October 1979 when she
`was found to have a solitary posteriorly sited cerebral
`secondary deposit. which, despite her age, has been success-
`fully removed surgically. At the time of writing, there is no
`evidence of any metastatic disease.
`
`C'trsr 2
`In August 1973, a 53-year-old man had had a four-month
`history of hematuria and passing clotspur ureflirmz. Clinical
`examination revealed a left-sided abdominal mass, which
`appeared to be a neoplasm of the kidney on IVP. At the
`apex of the left lung, a preoperative chest x-ray showed a
`
`Case Reports
`
`I
`C'rl.\c,
`A 73-year-old woman was diagnosed as having a clear
`cell carcinoma of the left kidney in April 1975. She had
`complained of general malaise and loss of weight for three
`years: during that time she had been examined twice but had
`not had intravenous pyelography (IVP). There were no
`clinical abnormalities, and investigations revealed iron de-
`ficiency anemia, low serum iron, and a sedimentation rate
`(ESR) of 87 mm per hour. A chest x-ray showed no
`
`From the Deparlments of Radiotherapy and Oncology: Churchill
`Hospital. Headington. Oxford and the Royal Free Hospital, Pond
`Street. London NW3.
`Present address: The Royal Hospital. Wolkerhampton. West
`Midland\. England.
`The ziurhor thanks Dr. E. Hoesen and Mr. P. Powley for their
`advice and for their permission t o report on patients under their care.
`The author also thanks Dr. J . V . Clark for reviewing the histology
`of Case I and Mrs. C. Barnes for manuscript preparation.
`Accepted for publication April 29. 1980.
`
`0008-S43X/8110415/Zl0Z $0.80 L' American Cancer Society
`2 102
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1135
`Breckenridge v. Novartis IPR2017-01592
`Fairlamb
`
`

`

`No. 8
`
`REGRESSION OF RENAL METASTASES . Fuirlonih
`
`2 I03
`
`shadow. which was radiologically a metastasis. On August
`14, 1973. a large tumor arising from the kidney and receiving
`extensive adventitious blood supply from the surrounding
`structures was removed. Histology showed a carcinoma of
`the kidney, and a paraaortic node removed at operation was
`completely replaced by tumor.
`A chest x-ray one month later was unchanged, but a film
`taken in January 1974 showed no abnormality. The patient
`remained well until February 1975 when he fractured the
`neck of his left femur following a bicycle accident. A chest
`x-ray showed no pulmonary secondaries, but a pathologic
`collapse of the tenth dorsal vertebra was seen. During his
`admission, he coughed up blood, and clinical examination
`revealed a nodule in his left pectoralis major. A biopsy was
`performed and showed metastatic renal cancer. He was dis-
`charged without further treatment and returned to work.
`However. review in January 1976 showed that the hip fracture
`had failed to unite despite the pin and plate, and lytic changes
`at the fracture site were seen. Although asymptomatic, the
`patient underwent a course of palliative cobalt radiotherapy
`to this area--71 Gy (2100 rads) in three fractions over 21
`days. He remained well, although a chest x-ray in August
`1976 showed a metastasis in the right lung.
`By December 1977, right third and fourth cranial nerve
`palsies developed, but no action was taken since he was
`otherwise asymptomatic. However, in September 1978,
`deteriorating mental function and behavioral disturbances
`led to his admission. A CT scan showed a right frontal
`metastasis: his pulmonary disease remained static, and his
`calcium level was normal. He made a spontaneous re-
`covery, but this proved transient, and he was admitted in
`January 1979 for terminal care following a pathologic frac-
`ture of the right neck of his femur. His physical and mental
`condition was poor, and the pathologic fracture was given
`a palliative single shot of 8 Gy (800 rads) ofcobalt teletherapy.
`He died on August 8, 1979.
`
`Discussion
`In the first case report, the bony and pulmonary
`metastases progressed following nephrectomy, and it
`was only after irradiation of the dominant groin
`secondary that any regression occurred. This report is
`the first record of spontaneous regression of metastases
`from a carcinoma of the kidney after irradiation of a
`metastasis.
`Both cases illustrate prolonged survival that may
`follow spontaneous regression of metastases, and this
`is not unusual as can be seen in the cases in Table 1.
`This table comprises those fully documented instances
`of spontaneous regression of metastatic renal cancer
`unrelated to hormone or other therapy. The sites were
`lung. 60, bone, 3, skin. I , liver, I , thigh, I , and in-
`testines, 1. The latter case is most curious since the
`patient, who had undergone nephrectomy for a hyper-
`nephroma and then radiotherapy to the renal bed,
`passed a piece of ”coarse papillous tissue” through the
`rectum after two episodes of intestinal hemorrhage 22
`
`months after the surgery. Histology of the partially
`necrotic mass was hypernephroid cancer. X-rays after
`a barium enema showed no abnormality. He passed two
`further tumors within the month, and histology was
`again confirmed. At a laparotomy performed for pyloric
`obstruction, a benign ulcer was found. and there was no
`in the abdominal
`evidence of metastatic disease
`cavity-this was 7% years after the initial nephrec-
`tomy (Case 5).
`In the cases previously reported. regression has
`usually followed the treatment of the primary by sur-
`gery (57 cases), or irradiation (four cases, nos. 33, 36,
`43, 5 I , followed by nephrectomy in three patients after
`metastases had regressed). Regression of other metas-
`tases has followed nephrectomy and irradiation of the
`dominant secondary (case no. 66), surgical removal of
`a metastasis in the absence of nephrectomy (case no.
`26), and in five cases before nephrectomy (case nos.
`11, 24, 42, 47, 48). Metastases may progress after
`nephrectomy only to regress later, or even appear after
`nephrectomy and spontaneously resolve. The second-
`aries may return in the same or different sites at a later
`date, and the regression appears to be palliative rather
`than curative. The long natural history of renal cancer
`is shown in a series of 443 patients deemed inoperable.
`because of tumor extent or other reasons: the crude
`survival rate at three years was 4.4% and at five years
`1.7%:’:’
`Whether an individual patient who has metastatic
`renal cancer should undergo nephrectomy is controver-
`sial. Several authors reporting single cases of sponta-
`neous regression after nephrectomy have supported
`this policy. Mims et u / . 2 7 described 97 patients with
`extensive renal cancer with metastases (distant in 5‘7
`cases) and saw only one case of spontaneous regres-
`sion of bony deposits. In their series, the five- and ten-
`year survival rates were 14 of 96 and 3 of 96, respec-
`tively. (They excluded a case of spontaneous regres-
`sion since the patient had only been followed for 13
`months, at which time he was still in remission.) How-
`ever, Middleton’5 reports 33 patients with secondaries
`who underwent nephrectomy, and there were no re-
`gressions and no patient survived two years. Johnson
`er ti/. I Y reported 43 cases with no regressions. The latter
`authors concluded that there was increased survival
`only for those patients who had exclusively osseous
`metastases and suggested that nephrectomy is not
`indicated for the asymptomatic patient with visceral
`deposits. The surgical mortality of nephrectomy in the
`presence of distant spread is not high in the series
`quoted: 6 of 97 and 1 of 43. The one patient died in the
`postoperative period of cerebral secondaries.
`Patients who have a solitary resectable secondary
`deposit should have this and the primary tumor re-
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1135
`Breckenridge v. Novartis IPR2017-01592
`Fairlamb
`
`

`

`2104
`
`CANCLR April 15 1981
`
`Vol. 47
`
`TABLE 1 . Fully Documented Cases of Spontaneous Regression
`
`Author
`
`Year
`
`Sex
`
`Age
`
`Site of
`metastases
`
`hl
`M
`M
`F
`h4
`M
`M
`F
`M
`M
`M
`M
`M
`F
`M
`M
`M
`M
`M
`F
`M
`F
`M
`M
`M
`M
`F
`M
`F
`M
`M
`M
`M
`M
`M
`M
`M
`F
`M
`M
`M
`M
`!4
`F
`F
`M
`M
`M
`M
`t.'
`M
`M
`M
`M
`t;
`M
`F
`F
`M
`M
`F
`M
`M
`M
`M
`F
`M
`
`)
`
`SY
`62
`,?
`57
`37
`60
`47
`75
`65
`34
`54
`59
`5x
`58
`55
`55
`43
`57
`63
`4x
`70
`64
`61
`41
`59
`56
`58
`49
`57
`56
`72
`56
`5 1
`3x
`69
`51
`47
`47
`5Y
`59
`70
`36
`59
`70
`55
`39
`68
`61
`4s
`58
`76
`53
`64
`67
`52
`49
`59
`49
`53
`71
`59
`55
`65
`51
`73
`55
`
`L
`L
`I.
`1-
`Intestines
`L
`L
`L
`1.
`L
`I.
`L
`L
`I-
`L
`I.
`L
`L
`L
`I.
`I.
`L
`L
`1.
`L
`L
`L
`L
`1.
`L
`L
`L
`L
`Bone
`L
`L
`L
`L
`L
`L
`I >
`L
`I.
`L
`L
`1-
`L
`L
`L
`L
`L
`Skin
`I .
`Thigh
`1-
`Bone
`L
`L
`Bone
`L
`L
`1,iver
`L
`L
`L
`L
`L
`
`Outcome
`
`5 yr. NED
`5/12 NED
`20 yr. NED
`16/12 NED
`7% yr. NED
`4 yr. NED died
`2 yr. N E D
`7 yr. AWD
`2 yr. N E D
`7/12 N E D
`2 yr. DOD
`3 rno. AWD
`3 yr. DOD
`3 yr. DOD
`1 yr. NED
`2Ih yr. DOD
`2 yr. NED
`4 yr. NED died
`2% yr. NED
`15 yr. NED
`19 mo. NED
`15 rno. NED
`18 rno. AWD
`4 rno. DOD
`9 rno. NED
`5 yr. NED died
`7 mo. NED
`8 yr. DOD
`4 yr. NED
`I2 yr. DOD
`3% yr. NED died
`2 yr. DOD
`2 yr. DOD
`I yr. N E D
`18 rno. NED
`2 yr. DOD
`6 yr. N E D
`13 mo. NED
`Y yr. DOD
`I yr. DOD
`13 rno. AWD
`3 yr. DOD
`3 yr. NED
`18 rno. NED
`6 rno. DOD
`? yr. N E D
`8 yr. DOD
`3 yr. AWD
`4 rno. NED
`20 yr. AWD
`4 rno. DOD
`I5 mo. DOD
`I yr. DOD
`6 rno. DOD
`3 yr. DOD
`4 yr. NED
`? I yr. DOD
`3 yr. NED
`10 yr. DOD
`2 yr. DOD
`18 rno. DOD
`4 yr. NED
`4 yr. NED
`12 yr. NED
`21 mo. NED
`4% yr. NED
`6 yr. DOD
`
`L I Lung: NED = no evidence of disease: AWD = alive with
`disease; and DOD 7 died of disease.
`
`Case
`no.
`1
`Burnpus
`Beer
`2
`3
`Mann
`4
`Gliedman "
`Klimpel
`5
`i
`Arcornano oi trl.
`7
`Cibert t't c r l .
`Bobbitt t'/ t r l .
`X
`Hallahan
`Y
`Kessel
`10
`Ljunngren r / ti/.
`I I
`I*junngren ('I r r l .
`I ?
`Buehler ( 1 1 rrl.
`I ?
`14
`Huehler c / ti/.
`I5
`Lageze c / t r l .
`16
`Nicholls and Siddons
`17
`Kolar e / ti/.
`Sarnellas and Marks
`18
`Miller vr t r l .
`19
`Prentiss r ! trl.
`20
`Hultborn
`? I
`22
`Hultborn
`Miyagdwa and Kodama
`23
`24
`Sakula
`Grahstald
`' 5
`26
`Cliffton (cited by Middleton
`27
`Ljunngren & Claes
`Gonick and Jackiw
`28
`Andrews
`2')
`30
`Jenkins
`31
`Miletinskaia'"
`32
`Adolfsson
`33
`Adolfsson
`34
`Mirns ci trl.
`35
`Taddei and Pistoechi."'
`36
`Hudgins and Collins
`37
`Puchetti I '
`Cockett '
`38
`3')
`Cockett
`40
`Markiewitz c'i trl.
`41
`Claret
`trl. "
`42
`Robinson
`43
`Ridings
`44
`Mathias
`45
`Bloom
`46
`Bloom
`47
`Baert and 'l'anghe I
`Meinders' '
`48
`49
`Garfield and Kennedy
`Garfield and Kennedy
`50
`De Georgi
`51
`Braren ('I rrl. -'
`52
`53
`Silber ('I (rl.
`s4
`Kaplan (cited by Holland I " )
`Susrnano (cited by Holland I ")
`55
`56
`Doolittle I
`57
`Freed oi trl. I
`58
`Freed ('I crl. I a
`59
`Freed ('I rrl. I .'
`60
`Boasberg t'r trl. I
`61
`Ihbrow I
`Deweerd t t rrl. I '
`62
`Ludwig ('I t r l . " '
`63
`64
`Rudowski 'Ii
`Mohr and Whitesel'"
`65
`66
`Present series
`67
`Present series
`.i\es 1-3. 5-30, see IJverson and Cole I '_
`C. . .
`Cases 32-34. 36. 40. 42. 43. 45. 46. 49-SI. see Bloom.'
`
`:)
`
`t
`
`1928
`1937
`I948
`1957
`1957
`1958
`1958
`1959
`1959
`1959
`IY59
`I959
`1960
`1960
`1960
`1960
`1961
`1961
`1062
`1962
`1963
`1963
`1 Y63
`I963
`1964
`1964
`1964
`I964
`I Y6.5
`196.5
`1965
`1966
`1 Y66
`1966
`1066
`1966
`I966
`I967
`1967
`I967
`I968
`I969
`1971
`1971
`1971
`1Y71
`1971
`1971
`I972
`197.2
`1 Y7?
`1 974
`1975
`197.5
`1975
`1975
`1976
`1976
`1976
`I976
`I Y77
`1977
`I977
`I978
`1 Y7Y
`1980
`1980
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1135
`Breckenridge v. Novartis IPR2017-01592
`Fairlamb
`
`

`

`No. 8
`
`REGRESSION OF RENAL METASTASES . Fuirlumh
`
`2105
`
`moved. The survival figures in 59 cases so treated'"
`were 45% at three years and 34% at five years, which
`are essentially the same for patients undergoing
`nephrectomy in the absence of metastases. This finding
`has been confirmed by Skinner et ul.:{' who reported 12
`of 41 patients alive at five years following removal of the
`primary and a solitary secondary tumor.
`Why spontaneous regression occurs is not clear,
`and that this should occur before nephrectomy is an
`enigma. Removal of the primary tumor may reduce
`hormonal, carcinogenic, or antibody blocking sub-
`stances elaborated by the cancer; alternatively, by
`reducing the large amount of tumor antigen, nephrec-
`tomy may allow the host's immune defenses to over-
`come the metastases.
`The evidence seems to favor an immunologic basis
`for the regression." Renal cancer is highly immuno-
`A re-
`genic and cytotoxic serum factors may
`cent study has shown that most patients (94%) with
`renal cancer have circulating, complement-fixing anti-
`bodies against renal carcinoma, and that if all detect-
`able tumor is excised the antibody titer declines. "'
`The two patients these authors reported who had
`recurrent tumor did not show a decrease in antibody
`titer, and before the clinical detection of metastases,
`antibody titers actually increased. Another patient
`clinically free of tumor still has a high titer. The authors
`concluded that "persistence of elevated antibody titres
`(greater than 1 in 4) is correlated with the presence of
`occult persistent tumour." Patients with metastatic
`disease had high antibody titers when the disease was
`limited, and only when the tumor became widely
`disseminated did the titers markedly diminish or
`disappear.
`An inverse relationship between prognosis in cancer
`and peripheral
`lymphocyte counts has been de-
`scribed.:{' In their study of 18 patients with renal cancer,
`Morales and Eidinger'" showed a progressive decline in
`the absolute number of circulating lymphocytes and the
`T-cell population that paralleled the advance of the
`in
`malignant process. Kjaer'" has demonstrated
`patients with renal cancer that tumor directed, cell-
`mediated hypersensitivity is significantly increased
`after extensive washing of the leukocytes in vitro. This
`finding is consistent with the concept that coating of the
`migrating cells by a factor specifically inhibits their
`reactivity to tumor extracts. The effect was related to
`the tumor burden of the patients and seemed to be a
`in
`significant cause of
`immunologic nonreactivity
`patients with metastases. He suggests that the factor is
`probably circulating tumor antigen. In vitro assessment
`of cell-mediated immunity in renal cancer patients by
`Montie c t ti/.2!' showed greater inhibition of tumor cell
`growth in patients who had had nephrectomy.
`
`The large amount of immunologic data concerning
`renal cancer is not just of academic interest. Recent
`reports have suggested that immunotherapy may have
`a role in the treatment of metastatic renal carcinoma.
`Morales and Eidinger'l report that four of ten patients
`showed objective response of the metastatic disease
`(sites not stated) following bacillus Calmette-Guerin
`(BCG) immunotherapy. The BCG was given intrader-
`mally by a multiple puncture technique, weekly for six
`weeks, fortnightly for an additional four weeks, and
`thereafter monthly for an indefinite period. Side effects
`were mild. These authors have been sufficiently en-
`couraged to set up a prospective clinical trial. Xeno-
`geneic immune ribonucleic acid prepared from the
`spleens of sheep that had been injected with a renal
`cancer homogenate has been administered intrader-
`mally in 12 patients with extensive renal cancer.:gx
`There was no local or systemic toxicity, and although
`no patient has been treated for more than 16 months,
`the authors suggest that there has been some clinical
`prepared polymer particles
`benefit. Tykki ct t i / .
`from autologous tumor material. and these were mixed
`with tuberculin or cundittu trlhicurzs antigen as adju-
`vants. This resultant mixture was injected intrader-
`mally into 3 1 patients monthly after palliative nephrec-
`tomy. All patients had extensive renal carcinoma, and
`2 I had pulmonary secondaries. There was complete
`regression of pulmonary disease in six patients, though
`two of these had received progestogens, which are of
`proven value. The mode of action of progestogens is
`unlikely to be immunologic since they have been used
`as an alternative to prednisolone in suppressing re-
`jection of renal transplants.'" A recent further report of
`these patients showed that seven have survived 48 to
`70 months (median, 56 months), and five have no signs
`of carcinoma. The five-year survival of the immuno-
`therapy group is 23.6% and 4.3% for a "control" group
`of 21 patients who did not receive immunotherdpy. The
`differences are said to be statistically significant.4'
`M y personal experience is limited to a single case of
`a 23-year-old man who had extensive pulmonary and
`nodal metastases after nephrectomy for hyperne-
`phroma. His disease progressed unchecked by intra-
`dermal BCG, and no benefit was derived from subse-
`quent administration of progestogens or cytotoxic
`drugs.
`The treatment of disseminated renal cancer has been
`unrewarding, and a recent extensive review of the
`literature by Luderer et ul.21 has indicated the dis-
`appointingly small response rates-cytotoxic
`agents
`16% and progestogens 8%. Such regressions are for a
`short time. There are too few reports of response to
`immunotherapy for satisfactory conclusions to be
`drawn, and whether regressions are of material benefit
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1135
`Breckenridge v. Novartis IPR2017-01592
`Fairlamb
`
`

`

`2106
`
`CAKCER April 15 1981
`
`Vol. 47
`
`to the patient remains to be seen. Further prospective
`trials of immunotherapy are needed, and since the
`likelihood of response depends largely on the body
`burden of tumor, anything that surgeons or radio-
`therapists can do to reduce this burden may be
`beneficial.
`
`R EFERENCES
`I . Baert L. Tanghe W. Sur un cas d'adenocarcinome renal avec
`metasases pulmonarires en regression spontanee. J Urol .\'oplrrol
`(Paris) 1971: 77:225-234.
`2. Bloom HJG. Regression of renal cancer. Canc,c,r 1973: 32:
`1066-1071.
`3. Bloom HJG. Adjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the
`position and prospects. Rr J U r d 1973: 45:
`kidney-present
`237- 227.
`4. Boasberg PI). Eilber FR. Morton [>I,.
`lmmunocompetence
`and spontaneous regression of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J
`Surg O t i c . o l 1976: 8:207-210.
`5 . Braren V. Taylor JN. Pace W. Regression of metastatic renal
`carcinoma following nephrectomy. Urology 1974: 3:777-778.
`6. Claret AJ. Aguirre CM, Villamil AA, Molinari P, Orlando EA.
`Desaparicion de metastasis pulmonar en adenocarcinoma de
`rinon. Kc,\. Argc~nr Urol 1968; 37:48-53.
`7. Cockett ATK. Renal Neoplasia. London: J & A Churchill.
`1967: 18-19.
`8. Cole WH. Spontaneous regression of cancer: the metabolic
`triumph of the host. Ant? N Y Ac,cit/Sci 1974: 230:lll-141.
`9. Cummings KB. Peter JB. Kaufmann JJ. Cytotoxic serum
`factors in patients with renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1974: 1 1 1 :
`330-333.
`10. de Kernion JB, Ramming KP. Gupta RK. The detection and
`clinical signiticance of antibodies to tumor associated antigens in
`patients with renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1979; 122:300-305.
`I I . Deweerd JH, Hawthorne NJ. Adson MA. Regression of renal
`cell hepatic metastasis following removal of primary lesion. J Urol
`1977: I17:790-792.
`12. Doolittle KH. Spontaneous remission of solitary bone
`sis after removal of a primary kidney adenocarcinoma. J
`U r d 1976: 116:803-804.
`13. Dubrow EL. Regression of metastatic hypernephroma. J Am
`G ~ r i t r l SOC. 1977: 25:454-457.
`14. Everson TC. Cole WH. Spontaneous Regression of Cancer
`Philadelphia: WB Saunders. Co.. 1966: 11-87.
`15. Freed SZ. Halperin JP, Gordon M. Idiopathic regression of
`metastases from renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1977: 118:538-541.
`16. Gliedman ML.. Horowitz S. Lewis FS. Lung resection for
`metastatic cancer: 29 cases from the University of Minnesota and
`a collcction review of 264 cases. Srdrgorj 1957: 4?:521-532.
`17. Hakala TR, Castro AE. Elliot A Y , Fraley EE. Humoral
`cytotoxicity in human renal cell carcinoma. ftit.c,s! Urol 1974: 1 I:
`405 - 4 10.
`18. Holland JM. National history and staging of renal cell car-
`cinoma. CA 1975: 25:121-133.
`19. Johnson AE. Kaesler KE, Samuels AL. Is nephrectomy
`justified in patients with metastatic renal carcinoma? J Urol 1975:
`114:27-29.
`20. Kjaer M. Effect of leucocyte washings in cellular immunity to
`human renal carcinoma. Eio. J Ccrnc~cr 1976: 12:783-792.
`21. I-uderer RC. Opirari M J . Perrotla AL. Treatment of meta-
`
`static renal cell carcinoma: review of experience and world
`literature. J A O A 1978: 77:590-603.
`22. Ludwig G. Jentzsch R. Nuri M. Spontanregression von
`.Wed Kliu 1977: 2 I:
`lungenmetastasen beim hypernephroma.
`2118-2121.
`23. Mathias DB. A case of spontaneous regression of pulmonary
`metastases from hypernephroma following nephrectomy. Hr J Urol
`1971: 43165-68.
`24. Meinders AE. Spontaneous regression of (presumably) pul-
`monary metastases in a patient with a renal clear cell carcinoma.
`kolitr .Mc,d ,l'rc,r 1971: 14:53-61.
`25. Middleton KG. Surgery for metastatic renal carcinoma. J
`L'rd 1967: 97:973-977.
`26. Milctinskaia GN. Regression of metastases of hyperne-
`phroid cancer to the lung. Urol Ncplirol (Moskvo) 1965: 30:
`59-60.
`27. Mims MM. Christenson B. Schlumberger FC. Goodwin WE.
`A ten-year evaluation of nephrectomy for extensive renal cell car-
`cinoma. J Urol 1966: 95: 10- 15.
`28. Mohr SJ, Whitesel JA. Spontaneous regression of renal cell
`carcinoma metastases after pre-operative embolisation of primary
`tumour and subsequent nephrectomy. Urology 1979: 14:s-8.
`29. Montie JE, Stratton KA, Deodhar SJ, Barna B. In vitro as-
`sessment of cell mediated immunity in patients with renal cell
`cancer. J Urol 1976: 115:239-242.
`30. Morales A. Eidinger D. Immune reactivity in renal cancer: a
`sequential study. J Urol 1976; 115:510-513.
`in the
`31. Morales A, Eidinger D. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin
`treatment of adenocarcinoma of the kidney. J Urol 1976: 115:
`377-380.
`32. Puchetti V . Regressione spontanea di metastasi polrnonari da
`ipernefroma. Cliir f r t r l 1966: 18: 1017- 1026.
`33. Riches E. The national history of renal turnours. In: Tumours
`of the kidney and ureter. Edinburgh and London: E. S. Livingston.
`1964: 124.
`34. Riesco A. Five year cancer cure: relation to total amount of
`peripheral lymphocytes and neutrophils. C'rincer 1970: 25: 135- 140.
`35. Rudowski W. Two cases of spontaneous neoplasm regression
`extending over many years. N o w o r \ t w r y 1978; 28: 173- 177.
`36. Silber SJ, Chang C . Gourd F. Regression of metastases after
`nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Br J Urol 1975: 47:
`259-261.
`37. Skinner DG, Colvin RB. Vermillion CD, Ptister RC, Lead-
`nd management of renal cell carcinoma-a
`clinical and pathological study of 309 cases. Ctrrr(.cr 1974: 28:
`1165-1177.
`38. Skinner DG, de Kernion JB, Brower PA, Ramming KP,
`Pilch YH. Advanced renal cell carcinoma. Treatment with xeno-
`gcneic immune ribonucleic acid and appropriate surgical resection.
`J U ~ I / 1976. I15:246-250.
`39. Taddei L. Pistocchi F. Regressions e scomparsa di metastasi
`polmonari di ipernefroma. Contributo casistico. Revisione della
`letteratura. N i o r t H d i o l 1966: 32:893-910.
`40. 'Turcotte, JG. Haines KF. Brody Gl.. MeyerTJ, Schwartz SA.
`Immuno suppression with medroxy progesterone acetate. 7rtrm-
`pl(rnto1ii)n 1968: 6:248-260.
`41. Tykki H. Hjelt L, Dravisto KJ. Turvoness M. Tallberg TH.
`Disappearance of lung metastases during immunotherapy in five
`patients suffering from renal cell carcinoma, Sctrnd J Kt..sp f)is
`(Suppl 1) 1974: 89:123-124.
`42. Tykka. H. Oravisto KJ. Sarna S, Tallberg T. Active specific
`immunotherapy of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 1978:
`4:250-258.
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1135
`Breckenridge v. Novartis IPR2017-01592
`Fairlamb
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket