throbber
Leukemia Research 23 (1999) 373–384
`
`Differences in phosphorylation of the IL-2R associated
`JAK:STAT proteins between HTLV-I ((cid:27)), IL-2-independent and
`IL-2-dependent cell lines and uncultured leukemic cells from
`patients with adult T-cell lymphoma:leukemia(cid:19)
`Qian Zhang a, Benhur Lee a, Magda Korecka a, Gong Li c, Charles Weyland b,
`Steven Eck a, Antoine Gessain d, Naochimi Arima e, Stuart R. Lessin c,
`Leslie M. Shaw a, Selina Luger b, Malek Kamoun a, Mariusz A. Wasik a,*
`a Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Uni6ersity of Pennsyl6ania Center, 7.106 Founders Bldg., 3400 Spruce Str. Philadelphia,
`PA 19104, USA
`b Department of Hematology-Oncology, Uni6ersity of Pennsyl6ania Center, 7.106 Founders Bldg., 3400 Spruce Str. Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
`c Department of Dermatology, Uni6ersity of Pennsyl6ania Center, 7.106 Founders Bldg., 3400 Spruce Str. Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
`d Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
`e Kagoshima Uni6ersity, Kagoshima, Japan
`
`Received 24 August 1998; accepted 7 October 1998
`
`Abstract
`
`To determine activation status of the IL-2R-associated (Jak:STAT) pathway in the HTLV-I infected cells, we examined tyrosine
`phosphorylation of Jak3, STAT3, and STAT5 in several HTLV-I ((cid:27)) T-cell lines and in uncultured leukemic T cells isolated from
`patients with adult T-cell lymphoma:leukemia (ATLL). Constitutive basal phosphorylation of Jak3 and, usually, STAT3 and
`STAT5 was detected in all four IL-2-independent cell lines tested, but in none of the three IL-2-dependent cell lines. Similarly,
`there was no detectable basal phosphorylation of Jak3 and STAT5 in the leukemic cells from ATLL patients (0:8 and 0:3,
`respectively). However, stimulation with IL-2 resulted in Jak3 and STAT5 phosphorylation in both leukemic ATLL cells and
`IL-2-dependent lines. Furthermore, expression of SHP-l phosphatase which is a negative regulator of cytokine receptor signaling,
`was lost in most IL-2 independent cell lines (3:4) but not in the leukemic ATLL cells (0:3). Finally, the HTLV-I ((cid:27)) T-cell lines
`(313) but not the control, HTLV-I ((cid:28)) T-cell lines were resistant to rapamycin and its novel analog RAD. We conclude that (l)
`HTLV-I infection per se does not result in a constitutive phosphorylation of the Jak3, STAT3, and STAT5 proteins; (2) malignant
`transformation in at least some cases of ATLL does not require the constitutive, but may require IL-2-induced, activation of the
`IL-2R Jak:STAT pathway; and (3) there are major differences in T-cell immortalization mechanism(s) which appear to involve
`SHP-l and target molecules for rapamycin and RAD. © 1999 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
`
`Keywords: IL-2R signaling; Malignant T cells; JAK5 kinase; STAT 5 protein; SHP-1 phosphatase
`
`1. Introduction
`
`IL-2 is a key cytokine involved in proliferation and
`differentiation of T lymphocytes and other cells of the
`immune system. IL-2 signaling involves dimerization of
`the b chain and common g chain (gc) of the IL-2
`
`(cid:19) Part of this work was presented at the XXXVIII Annual Meeting
`of the American Society of Hematology.
`* Corresponding author.
`
`receptor (IL-2R) [1]. In addition to IL-2R, the gc is a
`component of several other cytokine receptors; it can
`co-dimerize with cytokine-specific chains to transduce
`signals mediated by IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, and IL-15 [2–5].
`Signaling by cytokine receptors involves sequential acti-
`vation of the Janus-family tyrosine kineses (Jaks) and
`signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins
`(STATs) (reviewed in [6]). Binding of IL-2 to the IL-2R
`results in activation of Jakl and Jak3 kineses and
`tyrosine phosphorylation of several substrates, includ-
`
`0145-2126:99:$ - see front matter © 1999 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
`PII: S 0 1 4 5 - 2 1 2 6 ( 9 8 ) 0 0 1 7 3 - 8
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1063
`Zhang
`Page 001
`
`

`

`374
`
`Q. Zhang et al. :Leukemia Research 23 (1999) 373–384
`
`ing Jakl and Jak3 themselves, as well as the IL-2R b
`and gc chains [7]. The phosphorylated IL-2R chains
`recruit proteins such as STAT5 [8,9] and,
`in phyto-
`hemagglutinin preactivated T-cell blasts, STAT3 [8,10].
`The STATs, upon phosphorylation, presumably by the
`Jaks, translocate into the nucleus and bind to DNA to
`initiate transcription of the IL-2 responsive genes. In-
`volvement of Jak3 is crucial for transduction of signals
`mediated by rc because mutations of Jak3 result in
`severe immunodeficiency in patients [11,12] and mice
`[13,14] which mimics the immunodeficiency seen in
`mutations of the gc itself [15–18]. The immunodefi-
`ciency in the Jak3-deficient mice can be reversed by
`transfection of the hematopoietic [19] or embryonic [20]
`cells with functional, wild-type Jak3. Stat 5 appears
`also critical for activation of normal, postthymic T
`cells, because mature T cells derived from mice deficient
`in both a and b isoforms of STAT5 failed to yield
`proliferative response upon stimulation [21].
`Adult T-cell lymphoma leukemia (ATLL) is a malig-
`nancy affecting mature T lymphocytes. In most cases,
`the malignant ATLL cells display the CD3(cid:27), CD4(cid:27),
`CD8(cid:28), CD7(cid:28), and T-cell receptor (TCR) a:b((cid:27))
`phenotype. Characteristically, they express activation
`antigens such as HLA-DR and CD25 (IL2Ra chain)
`[22]. Numerous epidemiological and clinical studies
`have established the association of HTLV-I with ATLL
`as well as other diseases including tropical spastic para-
`paresis:HTLV-I associated myelopathy (TSP:HAM)
`[23]. Depending on the clinical course, the extent of the
`disease and the serum calcium level, ATLL can be
`divided into four clinical subtypes: acute, chronic,
`lymphomatous, and smoldering [24]. In all these vari-
`ants, patients have serum antibodies to HTLV-I and
`clonal integration of one or few copies of the virus in
`the DNA of the malignant cells [25,26]. Patients with
`detectable monoclonal or oligoclonal populations and
`elevated PBMC counts are at increased risk of develop-
`ing an overt ATLL disease [27]. However, the low
`frequency of ATLL (4–5%) among HTLV-I infected
`individuals [28] and the long average time interval
`between the occurrence of infection and the develop-
`ment of malignancy (20–30 years) indicate that addi-
`tional events are required for malignant transformation
`of T-cells.
`Experiments with HTLV-I transformed T-cell lines
`suggested that the virus may induce basal constitutive
`activation of the IL-2R associated Jak:STAT pathway,
`and that this pathway may be involved in HTLV-I-me-
`diated T-cell transformation [29,30]. However, we pre-
`viously
`found
`that
`constitutive
`activation
`of
`IL-2R-associated Jak:STAT signaling pathway also oc-
`curs in HTLV-I ((cid:28)) malignant cells from patients with
`cutaneous anaplastic large T-cell
`lymphoma (ALCL)
`[31]. This finding indicated that the constitutive activa-
`tion of IL-2R Jak:STAT pathway in transformed T
`
`cells may not be due to to the HTLV-I infection. To
`explore further the putative role of HTLV-I infection in
`the activation of this pathway, we examined several
`HTLV-I ((cid:27)) T-cell lines that differ in their IL-2 depen-
`dency for the basal and IL-2-induced phosphorylation
`of the Jak3, STAT3, and STAT5 proteins. Further-
`more, we also examined uncultured leukemic cells iso-
`lated directly from patients with ATLL. Our data
`demonstrate that the constitutive phosphorylation of
`the IL-2R associated Jak and STAT proteins is de-
`tectable only in the IL-2 independent HTLV-I ((cid:27)) cell
`lines. It is not seen in the IL-2 dependent HTLV-I ((cid:27))
`lines and the leukemic ATLL cells. Both these cell
`types, however, phosphorylate Jak3 and STAT5 in
`response to IL-2. Furthermore, most of the IL-2 inde-
`pendent cell lines, but none of the leukemic ATLL cells,
`lacked expression of SHP-1 which down-regulates
`phosphorylation of Jak3. Finally, the HTLV-I ((cid:27))
`lines, in contrast to the control, HTLV-I ((cid:28)) T-cell
`lines showed resistance to the IL-2R-signaling in-
`hibitors rapamycin and its novel analog RAD. Implica-
`tions of these findings for pathogenesis of the HTLV-I
`infection and ATLL are discussed.
`
`2. Materials and methods
`
`2.1. Patients
`
`A total of eight ATLL patients, two from the US and
`six from Japan, were tested. Peripheral blood mononu-
`clear cells (PBMC) were obtained by Ficoll centrifuga-
`tion [31,32]
`from two patients diagnosed at
`the
`University of Pennsylvania with ATLL based on clini-
`cal, histopathological, and immunophenotypic criteria.
`Both patients developed anti-HTLV-I antibodies as de-
`termined by Western Blot of serum proteins, peripheral
`white blood cell count greater than 50(cid:29)103:ul with a
`predominant lymphocytosis (greater than 50%), abnor-
`mal pathognomonic cells with multi-lobulated, flower-
`like nuclei on peripheral blood smear, serum LDH
`greater than 1.5 times upper limit of normal, and
`corrected Ca2(cid:27) of greater than 14 mg:dl. The above
`findings fulfilled criteria for the acute form of ATLL
`c
`[24]. Serum concentrations of soluble IL-2R were
`c
`59 520 U:ml (patient
`1) and 45 740 U:ml (patient
`2) (normalB1000 U:ml) indicating high tumor bur-
`dens ([33–35]). Flow cytometry analysis revealed that
`greater than 95% of PBMC from these patients had
`phenotypes
`consistent with ATLL cells
`(CD3(cid:27),
`CD4(cid:27), CD7(cid:28), CD25(cid:27), HLA DR(cid:27)). Fig. 1 shows
`c
`the cells with characteristic flower-like nuclei and
`salient flow cytometry data from patient
`1. Six
`Japanese patients were diagnosed with ATLL (five
`acute and one chronic form) at the Kagoshima Univer-
`sity using the same criteria as described above. Ficoll-
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1063
`Zhang
`Page 002
`
`

`

`Q. Zhang et al. :Leukemia Research 23 (1999) 373–384
`
`375
`
`isolated PBMC were cryopreserved in DMSO:FBS
`containing medium and thawed shortly before being
`used for experiments.
`
`Table 1
`HTLV-I status of the cell populations examined
`
`Cell types
`
`HTLV status
`
`Method of detec-
`tion
`
`PCR tax
`PCR tax
`PCR tax
`PCR tax
`PCR tax
`
`PCR tax
`Immunofluores-
`cence
`Immunofluores-
`cence
`
`PCR tax
`PCR tax
`PCR tax
`PCR tax
`Positive serology*
`
`(cid:28)(cid:28)
`
`(cid:28)
`(cid:28)
`(cid:28)
`
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`
`(cid:27)
`
`(cid:27)(cid:27)
`
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`
`Control cell lines
`YT (NK-like)
`Sez-4
`PB-1
`2A
`2B
`IL-2 dependent cell lines
`Boul
`Laf
`
`Cor
`
`IL-2 independent cell lines
`ATL-2
`C91PL
`C10MJ2
`HUT102
`ATLL Patients (8)
`
`* Cells were also histopathologically and immunophenotypically
`consistent with HTLV-I infected cells.
`
`Syndrome) and bears close morphological, pheno-
`typic, and genotypic resemblance to the fresh tumor
`cells [42]. The Sez4 line requires IL-2 (50–100 U:ml)
`for continuous proliferation. The YT line [43], a hu-
`man NK cell line, was kindly provided by J. Yodoi,
`Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. PB-1, 2A, and 2B
`T-cell
`lines which were established from a patient
`with a progressive cutaneous T-cell
`lymphoprolifera-
`tive disorder have been described in detail previously
`[31,44,45]. The PB-1 cell line was obtained at a rela-
`tively early stage of
`the patient’s cutaneous T-cell
`lymphoma from neoplastic T-cells circulating in pe-
`ripheral blood. The 2A and 2B lines were established
`at a later, more aggressive stage from two separate
`skin nodules, which represented a high-grade, T-cell
`anaplastic large-cell
`lymphoma. All five control cell
`lines were determined to be HTLV-I ((cid:28)) by PCR
`detection of the HTLV tax gene (Table 1). All the
`cell lines were propagated in a complete RPMI 1640
`medium containing 10% FBS (Hyclone, Logan, UT),
`1% L-glutamine
`(M.A. Bioproducts, Walkersville,
`MD), and 1% penicillin:streptomycin:fungizone mix-
`ture (M.A. Bioproducts).
`
`2.2. Cell lines
`
`lines were used:
`Two types of HTLV-I ((cid:27)) cell
`IL-2 independent
`cell
`lines derived mostly from
`ATLL patients and IL-2 dependent cell lines derived
`from nonleukemic, TSP:HAM patients. The HTLV-I
`((cid:27)), IL-2 independent cell lines were ATL-2: CD4(cid:27)
`CD8(cid:28) T cells originally cultured in IL-2 from
`PBMC of a patient with acute ATLL [36]; C91PL:
`cord blood T cell line established by co-culturing cord
`blood cells with known ATLL cells in the presence of
`IL-2 [37]; C1OMJ2: established from HTLV-I infected
`lymphocytes
`in a patient with ATLL [38]; and
`HUT102B: constitutive producer of HTLV-I derived
`from the lymph node of a patient with HTLV-I, also
`initially dependent on IL-2 [39,40]. HTLV-I ((cid:27)), IL-
`2 dependent cell
`lines, Boul, Laf, and Cor, were
`derived from HTLV-I
`((cid:27)) non-leukemic patients
`with TSP:HAM [41]. These cell lines required 50–100
`U:ml IL-2 for optimal growth and did not become
`IL-2 independent even after multiple passages. For
`controls, five HTLV-I ((cid:28)) cell lines were used. The
`Sez4 line, kindly provided by T. Abrams, Hahnemann
`University was derived from a patient with a
`leukemic phase of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (Sezary
`
`c
`Fig. 1. Left panel: a representative peripheral blood smear from
`ATLL patient
`1 showing pathognomonic large cells with flower-
`like nuclei (Wright–Giemsa, magnification 1000(cid:29)). Right panel:
`flow cytometry analysis of the patients PBMC which shows that
`\95% cells exhibit a CD3(cid:27), CD4(cid:27), CD8(cid:28), CD7(cid:28), HLA-DR(cid:27)
`and CD25(cid:27) phenotype consistent with ATLL. Representative dot
`plots are shown where \95% of cells are CD4(cid:27):CD25(cid:27)and
`CD7(cid:28).
`
`2.3. Flow cytometry
`
`Flow cytometry immunophenotyping of PBMC was
`performed using a standard panel of T- and B-cell
`reactive mAbs including the ones which recognize ac-
`tivation antigens HLA-DR and CD25
`(Becton-
`Dickinson).
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1063
`Zhang
`Page 003
`
`

`

`376
`
`Q. Zhang et al. :Leukemia Research 23 (1999) 373–384
`
`2.4. IL-2, antibodies (Ab), and immunosuppressi6e
`agents
`
`Recombinant human IL-2 was kindly provided by C.
`Reynolds, NCI, Frederick, MD. Rabbit polyclonal Abs
`against JAK3, STAT3, STAT5, and SHP-1 were pur-
`chased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz,
`CA). Anti-phosphotyrosine 4G10 murine monoclonal
`Ab was purchased from UBI (Lake Placid, NY). Perox-
`idase-conjugated donkey anti-mouse and goat anti-rab-
`bit Abs were obtained from Jackson Jackson Immuno
`Research (West Grove, PA). Rapamycin and SZS RAD
`were kindly provided by, respectively, Wyeth-Ayerst
`(Princeton, NJ)
`and Novartis
`Pharma
`(Basel,
`Switzerland).
`
`2.5. PCR:Southern blot analysis
`
`A total of 1.0 ug of genomic DNA was added to 50
`ml of standard buffer containing 1.5 mM MgC12, 1.25
`mM dNTP mix, 15 pmol of 3% and 5% primers, and 2.5
`U Taq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT). Reac-
`tion mixtures were amplified for 30 cycles of denatura-
`tion at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, and
`extension at 72°C for 30 s. Oligonucleotide primers for
`conserved sequences of the HTLV-I:II tax gene, SK43
`and SK44 [46], synthesized by Research Genetics,
`Huntsville, AL, were used for amplification of HTLV-I:
`II tax gene sequences. Amplification products were
`separated on 2% agarose gels, blotted and probed with
`32P-labeled SK45 probe [46] from Research Genetics as
`described before [47]. DNA from HTLV-II infected cell
`line (MoT) served as positive control.
`
`2.6. Protein expression and phosphorylation
`
`These assays were performed as described [31,48]. In
`brief, the cells (l0(cid:29)106) were washed, exposed for 5
`min to medium or 500 U IL-2, lysed for 20 min in l ml
`ice-cold lysis buffer (0.5% NP-40, 10 mM Tris–HC1
`(pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 0.4 mM EDTA, 1 mM
`sodium orthovanadate, 0.5 mM PMSF, 10 mM NaF,
`and 3 ug:ml each of pepstatin, leupeptin, chymostatin,
`and aprotinin: Sigma). The lysates were centrifuged at
`15 000 rpm for 10 min. Next, the supernatants were
`precleared overnight at 4°C with protein A-sepharose
`(Sigma, St Louis, MO), incubated with the anti-Jak3,
`-STAT3, -STAT5, or SHP-1 Ab, and protein A-sep-
`harose, washed, boiled, suspended in reducing SDS
`loading buffer, separated on a 10% polyacrylamide-
`SDS gel, and transferred electrophoretically to hy-
`bridization transfer membranes. The membranes were
`blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin in TBST buffer
`(l0 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4), 75 mM NaCl,
`l mM
`EDTA, 0.1% Tween 20) for at least 2 h at room
`temperature or overnight in a cold room. To detect
`
`protein phosphorylation, the membranes were incu-
`bated with 4G10 Ab, washed, incubated with donkey
`anti-mouse, peroxidase-conjugated Ab and washed
`again. To detect protein expression the membranes
`were incubated with the same Jak3, -STAT3, -STAT5,
`or -SHP-1 Abs which were used for precipitation. Blots
`were developed using the ECL chemiluminescence
`reagents (Amersham Life Science, Arlington Heights,
`IL).
`
`2.7. Proliferation assays
`
`These tests were performed as described previously
`[31,32]. In brief,
`the cell
`lines or PHA-stimulated
`PBMC were cultured for either 10 or 18 h in triplicate
`at 2(cid:29)104 cells:well in the presence of various concen-
`trations of the immunosupressive drugs; rapamycin or
`RAD. After 14 h pulse with 0.5 mCi of [3H]thymidine,
`radioactivity of the cells was measured.
`
`3. Results
`
`3.1. Determination of the HTLV-I infection status
`
`The HTLV-I ((cid:27)) status of all cell populations used
`was determined by detection of viral tax gene in ge-
`nomic DNA, detection of viral gene products via im-
`munofluorescence, or in patients, by clinical, histopath-
`ologic and immunophenotypic criteria for ATLL in
`combination with serological evidence for HTLV-I in-
`fection (see Section 2.1 and Fig. 1). Table 1 summarizes
`the HTLV-I status of the cell populations examined.
`Controls used included cutaneous T-cell lymphoma cell
`lines: Sez4 (IL-2 dependent) and PB-1, 2A, and 2B (all
`IL-2 independent) and an NK cell line, YT. All control
`cell lines were shown to be HTLV-I ((cid:28)) by the PCR
`assay for the HTLV-I tax gene.
`
`3.2. Phosphorylation of IL-2R associated Jak:STAT
`proteins in IL-2 independent T-cell lines
`
`The few HTLV-I ((cid:27)), IL-2 independent T-cell lines
`tested to date have all been reported to display consti-
`tutive activation of the IL-2R associated Jak:STAT
`pathway [26,27]. We explored the extent of these find-
`ings by analyzing four HTLV-I ((cid:27)), IL-2 independent
`T-cell lines (ATL-2, C1OMJ2, C91PL, HUT 102), two
`of which (ATL-2, C1OMJ2) have not been examined to
`date. Fig. 2A and Table 2 show that all the cell lines
`demonstrate a strong basal, constitutive phosphoryla-
`tion of Jak3 with only the HUT102 cell line showing a
`slight augmentation in response to IL-2. STAT3 and
`STAT5 are also strongly, constitutively phosphorylated
`in the ATL-2 and C10MJ2 cell lines (Fig. 2B, C, and
`Table 2). Interestingly, constitutive phosphorylation of
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1063
`Zhang
`Page 004
`
`

`

`Q. Zhang et al. :Leukemia Research 23 (1999) 373–384
`
`377
`
`the entire Jak3:STAT3:STAT5 pathway does not seem
`to be a universal feature even in these cell lines because
`two of the lines (C91PL and HUT102B) did not exhibit
`any detectable, basal phosphorylation of STAT5 in
`repeated experiments although they expressed the
`protein and strongly phosphorylated STAT5 in re-
`sponse to IL-2 (Fig. 2C, Table 2). This finding implies
`a dissociation between Jak3 and STAT5 phosphoryla-
`
`tion and suggests that the signals transduced by Jak3
`may not necessarily always depend on phosphorylation
`of STAT5. In addition, one cell line, C91PL, showed a
`lack of STAT3 phosphorylation in the presence or
`absence of IL-2. This pattern of response is similar to
`that seen in resting PBMC rather than mitogen pre-ac-
`tivated T-cells [8,26,28]. The control Sez4 malignant
`T-cell line which is HTLV-I ((cid:28)) and, noteworthy, IL-2
`
`Fig. 2. Phosphorylation of proteins associated with IL-2R signal transduction pathway in HTLV-I positive, IL-2 independent cell lines (ATL-2,
`C9lPL, C1OMJ2, HUT102B) derived from leukemic patients without ((cid:28)) and with ((cid:27)) stimulation by IL-2: (A) Jak3, (B) STAT3, and (C)
`STAT5. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with the anti-Jak3, -STAT3, and -STAT5 Ab, electrophoretically separated, transferred to a
`membrane and probed with an Ab (4G10) which recognizes phosphorylated but not non-phosphorylated tyrosines. Loading of equal sample
`volumes was confirmed by the subsesquent immunoblotting with the Ab used for immunoprecipitation after removal of the bound 4G10 Ab.
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1063
`Zhang
`Page 005
`
`

`

`378
`
`Q. Zhang et al. :Leukemia Research 23 (1999) 373–384
`
`Table 2
`Tyrosine phosphorylation of Jak3, STAT3 and STAT5 in HTLV-I positive cell populations: IL-2-independent and dependent T-cell lines, and
`leukemic cells denved from ATLL patients
`
`IL-2 Independent
`(HTLV I(cid:27), leukemic)
`ATL-2
`C10MJ2
`C91PL
`HUT102B
`IL-2 Dependent
`(HTLV I(cid:27), non-leukemic)
`Boul
`Laf
`Cor
`c
`c
`ATLL patients
`c
`1–
`2
`c
`c
`3
`8
`4–
`Controls
`(HTLV I-)
`Sez-4
`YT (NK-like)
`PBMC†
`PHA blasts**
`
`(IL-2)*
`
`JAK3
`
`STAT3
`
`STAT5
`
`(cid:28)
`
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`
`(cid:28)
`(cid:28)
`(cid:28):(cid:27)
`
`(cid:28)
`(cid:28)
`(cid:28)
`
`(cid:28)
`
`(cid:28)
`
`(cid:27)
`
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)(cid:27)
`
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)(cid:27)
`
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`
`(cid:27)
`
`(cid:27)
`
`(cid:28)
`
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`(cid:28)
`(cid:27)
`
`(cid:28):(cid:27)
`(cid:28):(cid:27)
`NDa
`
`(cid:28)
`ND
`ND
`
`(cid:27)
`
`(cid:28)
`
`(cid:27)
`
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)(cid:27)
`(cid:28)
`(cid:27)
`
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`
`(cid:28)
`ND
`ND
`
`(cid:27)
`
`(cid:27)
`
`(cid:28)
`
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`(cid:28)
`(cid:28)
`
`(cid:28)
`(cid:28)
`(cid:28)
`
`(cid:28)
`(cid:28)
`ND
`
`(cid:28)
`
`(cid:28)
`
`(cid:27)(cid:27)
`
`(cid:27)(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`
`(cid:27)
`(cid:27)
`ND
`
`(cid:27)
`
`(cid:27)
`
`a ND, not done.
`* Cells were exposed in vitro to 500 units of IL-2.
`** Normal PBMC tested after 5 days of stimulation with PHA.
`† PBMC from a healthy donor.
`
`dependent, also showed a lack of STAT3 phosphoryla-
`tion even after stimulation with IL-2. These observa-
`tions indicate that STAT3 activation may not be crucial
`for the transduction of IL-2R:Jak 3 mediated mitogenic
`signals.
`
`3.3. Phosphorylation of IL-2R associated Jak:STAT
`proteins in IL-2 dependent T-cell lines
`
`To determine if HTLV-I infection per se induces
`constitutive phosphorylation of the IL-2R associated
`Jak:STAT pathway, we analyzed several HTLV-I ((cid:27))
`cell lines which are IL-2 dependent. To ensure that any
`basal phosphorylation of Jak:STAT proteins was not
`due to the prior exposure to IL-2, these cells were
`incubated for 4–6 h without IL-2 before the assay. In
`contrast to the results obtained with the HTLV-I ((cid:27)),
`IL-2 independent cell lines, Jak3 was not constitutively
`phosphorylated in any of these lines (Boul, Laf, Cor)
`(Fig. 3A, Table 2). Only one of the lines, Cor, appears
`to have a minimal level of basal phosphorylation in the
`absence of IL-2. However, this phosphorylation de-
`creased to non-detectable levels when time of IL-2
`withdrawl was increased to 16 h (such prolonged IL-2
`removal did not affect the ability of cells to respond to
`IL-2; data not shown). These findings indicate that the
`
`three
`Jak3:STAT3:STAT5 phosphorylation in all
`HTLV-I ((cid:27)), IL-2 dependent T-cell lines was triggered
`by IL-2 and not HTLV-I infection. All cell lines phos-
`phorylated Jak3 in response to IL-2 (Fig. 3A, Table 2)
`which indicates that this pathway is functional and
`presumably required for the IL2 mediated proliferation
`of these cells. STAT3 appears to have, under the testing
`condition, a minimal level of basal constitutive phos-
`phorylation in two lines (Boul and Laf), which was
`markedly augmented by exogenous IL-2 (Fig. 3B, Table
`2). The control, HTLV-I negative, sez4 T-cell line failed
`to phosphorylate STAT3 upon IL-2 stimulation.
`No basal activation of STAT5 was noted in the three
`HTLV-I ((cid:27)) and the control HTLV-I ((cid:28)) Sez4 line,
`but all four lines phosphorylated strongly STAT5 after
`exposure to IL-2 (Fig. 3C, Table 2).
`
`3.4. Analysis of Jak3, STAT3, and STAT5
`phosphorylation in leukemic T cells deri6ed from ATLL
`patients
`
`Because HTLV-I ((cid:27)) cell lines examined thus far
`showed either constitutive or IL-2 inducible phosphory-
`lation of Jak3, STAT3, and:or STAT5, we were inter-
`ested in determining which of these two patterns is
`present in the uncultured, malignant T cells derived
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1063
`Zhang
`Page 006
`
`

`

`Q. Zhang et al. :Leukemia Research 23 (1999) 373–384
`
`379
`
`directly from ATLL patients. Results from eight ATLL
`c
`patients are summarized in Table 2 and the representa-
`tive data from patient
`1 (see Section 2.1 and Fig. 1)
`are shown in Fig. 4. There was no evidence for basal
`phosphorylation of either Jak3 (0:8 pts), STAT3 (0:2
`pts) or STAT5 (0:3 pts) in the absence of IL-2. How-
`ever, phosphorylation of Jak3 and STAT5 occured in
`response to IL-2 in all patients tested. These findings
`indicate that there is no basal constitutive activation of
`Jak3 and STAT5 in the leukemic ATLL cells tested but
`these cells are able to activate the IL-2R Jak:STAT
`pathway when exposed to IL-2.
`Interestingly, no
`STAT3 phosphorylation could be observed in response
`to IL-2 in the two patients tested. This pattern of
`response resembles the one seen in the normal resting
`PBMC,
`rather
`than in mitogen-preactivated T-cell
`blasts, which do activate STAT3 upon stimulation with
`IL-2 [8,29,31].
`
`Fig. 3. Analysis of Jak:STAT phosphorylation in HTLV-I positive
`IL-2 dependent cell lines (Boul, Cor, Laf) derived from non-leukemic
`patients before ((cid:28)) or after ((cid:27)) stimulation with IL-2: (A) Jak3, (B)
`STAT3, (C) STAT5. The cell immunoprecipitates obtained with the
`anti-Jak3, -STAT3, and -STAT5 Ab were electrophoretically sepa-
`rated, transferred to a membrane and probed with the 4G10 Ab.
`Loading of equal sample volumes was confirmed by reblotting with
`the Ab used for immunoprecipitation (data not presented).
`
`Fig. 4. Phosphorylation of the IL-2R-associated Jak:STAT pathway
`c
`in freshly isolated leukemic cells from a representative ATLL patient
`(
`1) before ((cid:27)) or after ((cid:28)) stimulation with IL-2. The membrane-
`immobilized cell immunoprecipitates were separated, transferred, and
`probed with the 4G10 Ab. Equal sample loading was confirmed by
`reblotting with the Ab used for immunoprecipitation (data not pre-
`sented).
`
`3.5. Analysis of SHP-1 expression in HTLV-I ((cid:27))
`T-cells
`
`It has been shown that a protein tyrosine phos-
`phatase, SHP-1 (also known as PTP1C, SHP, and
`SHPTP1), binds to several different cytokine receptors
`[6]
`including IL-2R [49]. SHP-1 appears to act by
`dephosphorylation of Jak kineses [50]. Noteworthy,
`dysfunction of SHP-1 as seen in a natural (‘motheaten’)
`SHP-1 knock-out mice, resuts in a hyperplasia of the
`erythroid and lymphoid lineages [51,52]. Furthermore,
`it has been found that some HTLV-I ((cid:27)) cell lines
`failed to express SHP-1 protein [49]. Because these
`HTLV-I ((cid:27)) T-cell lines displayed constitutive activa-
`tion of
`the
`IL-2R-associated Jak:STAT pathway
`[29,49], this finding suggested a casual relationship be-
`tween the lack of SHP-1 expression and the constitutive
`Jak:STAT activation. To explore further this apparent
`relationship, we examined SHP-1 expression in our
`panel of HTLV-I ((cid:27)), IL-2 independent T-cell lines
`which displayed constitutive phosphorylation of Jak3,
`STAT5, and:or STAT3. Furthermore, we examined
`SHP-1 expression in the previously uncultured leukemic
`cells from ATLL patients which, as described above,
`showed phosphorylation of Jak3 and STAT5 only after
`stimulation with IL-2. As shown in Fig. 5, three out of
`four HTLV-I ((cid:27)) T-cell lines showed lack of SHP-1
`protein expression. Only one line; HUT102B expressed
`SHP-1; this observation was made also by others [49].
`In contrast to the cell lines, uncultured leukemic cells
`from three ATLL patients expressed SHP-1. These
`findings provide additional evidence that there is an
`inversed correlation between the SHP-1 expression and
`constitutive IL-2R Jak:STAT activation and support
`the hypothesis that there indeed may be the cause-and-
`effect relationship between these two events.
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1063
`Zhang
`Page 007
`
`

`

`380
`
`Q. Zhang et al. :Leukemia Research 23 (1999) 373–384
`
`3.6. Effect of immunosuppressi6e drugs on proliferation
`of HTLV-I ((cid:27)) and HTLV-I ((cid:28)) T-cells
`
`Our previous study [31] has demonstrated that cell
`lines derived from HTLV-I ((cid:28)) cutaneous large T-cell
`lymphoma which display IL-2 independent growth and
`a constitutive activation of the IL-2R Jak:STAT signal-
`ing pathway, are sensitive to an immunosuppressive
`agent rapamycin. Rapamycin has been shown to act as
`an inhibitor of the IL-2R signaling by interfering with
`activation of one of
`the down-stream signaling
`molecules: p70 S6 kinase [53,54]. It was interesting,
`therefore, to test the effect of rapamycin on the HTLV-
`I ((cid:27)) T-cell lines which also show an IL-2 indepen-
`dence and constitutive activation of
`the
`IL-2R
`Jak:STAT pathway. In addition to rapamycin we used
`its novel analog RAD. As can be seen, both rapamycin
`(Fig. 6A) and RAD (Fig. 6B) profoundly inhibited
`growth of the HTLV-I ((cid:28)) T-cells. To exert their effect
`both drugs required a relatively long incubation period
`with the target cells. Whereas 24 h exposure resulted in
`the maximal
`inhibition of 40–80% for the various
`HTLV-I(cid:28)T-cell lines tested, 32 h exposure resulted in
`80–95% inhibition. In striking contrast, none of the
`three HTLV-I ((cid:27)) cell lines was markedly inhibited by
`either rapamycin or RAD (Fig. 6C and D, respectively)
`at even the highest doses after the 32 h exposure
`(0–30% inhibition). Interestingly, addition of RAD,
`particularly at the shorter exposure time, resulted in a
`mild (0–30%) augmentation rather than suppression of
`the proliferative rate. Taken together these data suggest
`that there are important differences in mitogenic signal-
`ing events downstream of IL-2R between the examined
`here HTLV-I ((cid:27)) and HTLV-I ((cid:28)) T-cells despite
`their similarity in constitutive activation of the IL-2R
`Jak:STAT pathway.
`
`Fig. 5. Expression of SHP-1 phosphatase in HTLV-I ((cid:27)) cell lines
`c
`(ATL-2, C91PL, C1OMJ2, HUT102), uncultured leukemic ATLL
`cells (pts
`1, 3, and 5), and control PBMC and PHA-prestimulated
`T-cell blasts (PHA bl). The cell lysates were electophoretically sepa-
`rated, transfered, and probed with an anti-SHP-1 antibody. Equal
`sample loading was confirmed by reblotting with an anti-Jak3 Ab
`(data not presented).
`
`4. Discussion
`
`Two previous reports have shown that HTLV-I ((cid:27))
`T-cell lines have constitutively activated IL-2R-associ-
`ated Jak:STAT signal transduction pathway [29,30].
`This finding suggested that HTLV-I infection may acti-
`vate this signaling pathway. In addition, they implied
`that activation of the IL-2R-associated Jak:STAT path-
`way may be critical in the pathogenesis of ATLL. This
`conclusion was further supported by a recent report
`[55] which described a basal, apparently constitutive
`activation of this pathway in uncultured leukemic cells
`from eight out of twelve ATLL patients. However, our
`data demonstrate clearly that HTLV-I infection per se
`does not result in a constitutive activation of the IL-2R-
`associated Jak:STAT pathway. Although all HTLV-I
`((cid:27)), IL-2 independent cell lines tested so far indeed
`displayed a strong, constitutive phosphorylation of
`Jak3, STAT3, and:or STAT5 (29, 31, Fig. 2, and Table
`2), the HTLV-I ((cid:27)) T-cell lines which require IL-2 for
`their growth, showed phosphorylation of these proteins
`only after stimulation with IL-2 (Fig. 3 and Table 2).
`Withdrawal of IL-2 invariably resulted in the profound
`decrease in the Jak3:STAT3:STAT5 phosphorylation,
`usually to the undetectable levels (Fig. 3, Table 1, data
`not presented). Furthermore,
`in our experiments the
`IL-2R associated Jak:STAT pathway was also quies-
`cent in uncultured leukemic cells isolated directly from
`all eight ATLL patients studied. This pathway was,
`however, fully functional
`in such leukemic cells as
`demonstrated by strong phosphorylation of Jak3 and
`STAT5 upon stimulation of the cells with IL-2. In
`addition to providing additional evidence that HTLV-I
`infection per se does not result in a basal constitutive
`activation of the IL-2R associated Jak:STAT signaling
`pathway, these data indicate that constitutive activation
`of this pathway may not be required for malignant
`T-cell transformation in at least some cases of ATLL.
`Because the leukemic ATLL cells responded to IL-2 in
`virtually all cases, it is likely that this cytokine plays a
`role in the pathogenesis of ATLL. Previous studies
`(reviewed in [56]) have shown that malignant ATLL
`cells derived from lymph nodes rather than peripheral
`blood, tend not only to respond but also produce IL-2.
`This IL-2 production which was not seen in the circu-
`lating
`leukemic
`cells,
`requires
`the presence of
`macrophages. These findings, combined with our data,
`suggest

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket