throbber
VOL. XXXI NO. 6
`
`THE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS
`
`539
`
`RAPAMYCIN (A Y-22,989), A NEW ANTIFUNGAL ANTIBIOTIC
`
`III.
`
`IN VITRO AND IN VIVO EVALUATION
`
`H. BAKER~ A. S100Row1cz, S. N. SEHGAL and CLAUDE VEZINA
`Department of Microbiology, Ayerst Research Laboratories,
`Montreal, Quebec, Canada
`
`(Received for publication March 11, 1978)
`
`The activity of rapamycin, a new anti-Candida antibiotic, was not affected by pH values
`between 6 and 8; at pH 4, however, activity was abolished. The MIC of rapamycin did not
`vary drastically with the size of inoculum: a ten-fold dilution of the inoculum reduced the MIC
`only two-fold. Serum binding was extensive. Serum levels obtained in mice were higher on
`subcutaneous injection than with oral administration. Dogs absorbed rapamycin after oral
`administration.
`Rapamycin cured systemic candidosis in mice: PDso s. c. was 9.5 mg/kg; PD50 p. o. \\'as
`In the same experimental infections amphotericin B and nystatin exhibited PDso
`11 mg/kg.
`values of < 0.25 mg and > 4,000 units/kg respectively. Rapamycin and amphotericin B,
`administered at 1, 4 and 24 hours after infection, gave approximately the same percent survival
`after 30 days of observation. When the above treatment was extended by an additiona1 daily
`rrcatment for 6 days, rapamycin by the subcutaneous route yielded a higher percentage of
`survival than either rapamycin or amphotericin B, administered orally, after a 30-day obsen•a(cid:173)
`tion period. Vaginal candidosis in female rats was treated efficiently (91 % cure) by rapamycin
`administered orally. No increase of resistance of C. albicans was observed during treatment.
`
`Rapamycin is an antifungal antibiotic produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus NRRL 5491 10 ).
`It was isolated in pure, crystalline form and found to be mainly active against Candida species; C.
`It has no activity against bacteria, Trichomonas vagina/is, T.
`albicans is the most sensitive species6 '.
`foetus, and Protheca segbwema (pathogenic alga); it is moderately active against filamentous fungi,
`including some Dermatophytes, and weakly active against dimorphic fungi. Acute toxicity is low7> =
`LDso in mice is 597 (i. p.) and > 2,500 mg/kg (p. o.); LDso in rats is > 1,600 (i. p.), 40 (i. v.), and > 1,600
`mg/kg (p. o.).
`The present study deals with the influence of pH, serum and inoculum size on rapamycin activity,
`its bioavailability in mice and dogs, and the protection it affords to mice and rats against both systemic
`Its in vivo activity is compared to that of amphotericin B3•8> and nystatin~).
`and vaginal candidoses.
`A method is described for studying the effect of antifungal agents on vaginal candidosis in rats.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`Test antibiotics
`Nystatin and amphotericin B were generously provided by E. R. Squibb and Sons, Ltd., Montreal,
`Que. Pure rapamycin was prepared as previously reported&'.
`Candida albicans strains
`C. albica11s strain AY F-598 is the test organism for rapamycin assay. C. a/bicans ATCC 11,651
`(A Y F-634) was used to produce systemic infections in mice and vagina] infections in rats.
`Culture media and inocu1a
`Candidal strains were maintained as lyophilized cultures. Cultures were grown on BBL-SABOURAUD
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1047
`Baker
`Page 001
`
`

`

`540
`
`THE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS
`
`JL:"E 1978
`
`Dextrose Agar (Baltimore Biological Laboratory, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland) at 37'JC for 18 hours,
`then transferred to BBL-SABOURAUD Liquid Broth (modified) and incubated under the same conditions.
`These Jiquid cultures were diluted ten-fold, and the resulting diluted suspensions served as inocula for
`SABOURAUD Liquid Broth used for MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) determinations, and BBL(cid:173)
`Nystatin Assay Agar (Antibiotic Medium No. 12) for serum assay of rapamycin 1
`., •
`
`MIC determination
`The minimum inhibitory concentration was determined by the conventional two-fold serial broth
`dilution method. Culture tubes containing 10 ml of the medium were inoculated with 0.1 ml of the
`inoculum described in the preceding section, and incubated at 37°C for 7 days. Tubes were examined
`for visible turbidity at 2 and 7 days. To determine the influence of pH on MIC, HCI or NaOH was
`added to SABOURAUD Liquid Broth before sterilization to give pH values of 4, 6, 7, and 8 at the time of
`inocu1ation. MI C's were also determined in the presence of 5 % sterile horse serum added to SABOURAUD
`Liquid Broth before inoculation. The effect of inoculum size on MIC was studied using an inoculum
`prepared as above, and adjusted by plate counts to contain 52 x 106 celJs/ml; MI C's were read at 48 hours,
`then each tube was subcultured on SABOURAUD Dextrose Agar plates to determine the minimum fun(cid:173)
`gicidal concentration (MFC).
`Bioavailability study
`Swiss albino Wistar male mice (25- 30 g) were administered micronized rapamycin as a suspension
`in 5~,~ acacia; the suspension was given by gavage (p. o.) or by subcutaneous injection. Mice, in groups
`of three. were bled by cardiac puncture at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours; therefore, the sera of three animals were
`combined to constitute one bleeding.
`A cross-over design was used in the dog (10 kg each) study. On day 0, one dog received 250 mg and
`the other dog 500 mg of rapamycin contained in a gelatin capsule. After one week rest, the same doses
`were reversed in the same dogs. Blood was sampled from the jugular vein in the neck at 0, l, 2, 4 and 6
`hours after rapamycin administration, allowed to clot, and the serum collected for assay.
`Sera were assayed on the day of bleeding by a modification of the agar diffusion method of BENNETT
`> with C. albicans A Y F-598 as the test organism and Nystatin Assay Agar as the assay medium.
`et a/. 1
`The liquefied assay medium (200 ml) was inoculated with 0.25 ml of a ten-fold dilution of a 18-hour
`broth culture of the test organism. Standard solutions of rapamycin were prepared in appropriate
`serum from a stock solution containing 100 /tg ofrapamycin per ml (in methanol) to give final concentra(cid:173)
`tions of 5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.625 and 0.3125 pg/ml of serum. These standard sera were pipetted in quadrupli(cid:173)
`cate into agar wells according to a randomized arrangement. Serum samples, undiluted, were similarly
`distributed. All plates were then incubated at 37°C for 18 hours. Zones of inhibition were measured,
`averaged and the average of each standard plotted against rapamycin concentration on semi-Jog graph
`paper to draw the standard curve. Concentration of the unknowns was obtained by interpolation from
`the standard curve.
`~~~tc~i_on ilga_i!l~. systemic c~ndidosis
`Preliminary experiments had shown that the intra venous injection of 3 - 7 x I 06 cells of C. a/hicans
`ATCC 11,651 killed untreated Swiss albino Wistar male mice (25- 30 g) within 48 hours.
`ln subse(cid:173)
`quent studies, the infecting dose ranged from 5 to 7 x 106 cells.
`The treatment consisted of three doses, administered either orally or subcutaneously at l, 4 and
`:24 hours after infection.
`In one study, after the initial three treatments, a single daily treatment was
`continued for G days. Deaths were recorded, and survivors kept under observation for 7, 18 and 30
`days, depending on the study.
`Infected, non-trcatedt as well as non-infected, treated mice served as
`controls for mortality and drug toxicity. Each treatment group comprised at least 10 mice. PD:o was
`calculated according to REED and MuENc11 5>.
`Rapamycin was administered as a suspension in 5 ~ .. ~acacia. Mycostatin (nystatin) a.nd Fungizone
`(amphotericin B) were administered as the commercial products according to the recommendations of
`the manufacturer.
`Pr~tection againsl vaginal canc:!i_dos~s
`Sprague-Dawley female rats (150 g) \\'ere infected intravaginally by means of specially prepared
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1047
`Baker
`Page 002
`
`

`

`VOL. XXXI :"iO. 6
`
`THE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS
`
`541
`
`airfoam sponge plugs previously contaminated with C. albicans ATCC 11,651. Sterile cylindrical air(cid:173)
`foam sponge plugs (7I16" in length x 5/ 16 11 in diameter) were placed in 125-ml Erlenmeyer flasks (25
`plugs/flask) containing 75 ml of SABOURAUD Liquid Broth inoculated with C. albicans ATCC J 1,651.
`Flasks were incubated without agitation at 37°C for 18 hours. After incubation, the plugs were removed
`to sterile Petri plates and the broth culture centrifuged to recover the candidal cells which were then
`resuspended in 7.5 ml of sterile 10% glucose solution. Each plug was saturated with 0.2 ml of this
`suspension. One infected plug was inserted and remained in the rat vagina for the duration of the experi(cid:173)
`ment. Presence of candidal cells was ascertained by microscopic smear examination and cultures.
`The treatment consisted of a single oral dose of rapamycin (50 mg/kg) or Mycostatin (40,000 units/
`kg). administered daily for 6 days. The course of infection was monitored by vaginal swab cultures
`taken on days J, 4 and 6 of treatment, and on days 2 and 3 after termination of therapy. The amount
`of candidal growth was estimated semi-quantitatively on a scale from 0 (no growth) to 4 + (heavy
`growth). The response to treatment was evaluated by the decrease of number of animals having vaginal
`cultures wirh moderate (3 +) and heavy (4 +) growth as compared to untreated controls.
`
`Results
`
`Effect of pH. Scrum and Ino;:;ulum Size
`At pH 6 and 7, the MIC of rapamycin against C. alhicans was < 0.02 pg/ml as read after 2 and 7
`days of incubation in SAROURAUD liquid broth. At pH 4, the MIC increased to > 10 pg/ml; at pH 8.
`it was found to be < 0.02 pg/ml after 2 days of incubation, but 0.16 pg/ml after 7 days of incubation.
`In the presence of 5 ~,~horse scrum, the MIC of rapamycin was > 1011g/ml as compared to < 0.02
`;1g/ml in the absence of scrum; observation was at 2 and 7 days of incubation in SABOURAUD liquid broth.
`The MIC value of rapamycin against C. albicans was not affected by inoculum sizes between IO and
`50 x 10· cells/ml. For an inoculum of 5.2 x 10~ cells/ml or less, a two-fold decrease in MIC was noted.
`The M FC remained constant at 0.05 /tg/ml with all inoculum sizes tested.
`
`Bioavailability in Mice, Rats and Dogs
`Rapamycin was administered to male mice at a dose or 15 mg/kg. Results are illustrated in Fig.
`1. Serum levels were higher for the subcutaneous than for the oral route of administration. Distinct
`
`Fig. I. A \"eragc scrum concentration of rapamycin
`in mice after oral or subcutaneous administration
`or 15 mg;kg.
`
`Fig. 2. A vcrage scrum concentration of rapamycin
`in dogs after oral administration of 250 and 500 mg/
`dog: two-dog cross-over experimen l.
`
`/'\500mg
`I
`\
`I
`I
`I
`,.,
`../
`,,...
`/
`.........
`/
`',...,,..,;...
`
`\.
`
`',
`'
`\,
`
`\
`
`\
`
`1.0
`
`o.e
`~
`g: 0.6
`c:: ·u
`>.
`E 0.4
`D
`a.
`0
`0::
`
`0.2
`
`I
`I
`I
`
`'
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`0'-----..1..-----L----.....__ __ ~
`0
`I
`2
`3
`4
`Time after adminis1ration(hoursJ
`
`2
`4
`3
`5
`Time ofter odminisfrarion {hoursJ
`
`6
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1047
`Baker
`Page 003
`
`

`

`542
`
`THE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS
`
`JUNE 1978
`
`peaks were observed in both curves. Rapamycin was not eliminated very rapidly from blood; 4 hours
`after subcutaneous or oral administration, the concentration of rapamycin stiJl present in blood was
`4.3 and 1.85 Jlg/ml respectively; these values are welJ above the MIC and MFC of rapamycin against
`C. albicans ATCC 11,651.
`Rapamycin was administered orally to two dogs in a cross-over study at two doses, 250 and 500 mg/
`dog. The results are illustrated in Fig. 2. For the Jower dose a single peak of 0.55 µg/ml was obtained
`at 2 hours; the concentration then decreased to reach a minimum at about 4 hours, after which it increas(cid:173)
`ed slightly to 0.21 p.g/ml at 6 hours, probably toward a second peak. For the higher dose two peaks
`were observed as in mice, one peak of0.75 µg/ml at 2 hours, and another peak of0.98 µg/ml at 4.5 hours.
`At 6 hours the concentration was 0.61 µg/ml.
`In summary, subcutaneous or oral administration of rapamycin to mice and dogs led to rapid ab(cid:173)
`sorption and yielded blood serum concentrations well above the MIC and MFC values of the antibiotic
`against C. a/bicans ATCC 11,651.
`
`Protection against Systemic Candidosis
`Rapamycin was compared to amphotericin B and nystatin in protecting mice against a systemic
`infection with C. albicans A TCC 11,651. Antibiotics were administered orally 1, 4 and 24 hours after
`an intravenous injection of 6.5 x 106 candidal cells. The results are tabu1ated in Table 1. The PDso's
`for rapamycin, amphotericin B and nystatin were respectively 11 mg/kg, < 0.25 mg/kg and > 4,000
`units/kg. When the antibiotics were administered subcutaneously (Table 2) the results were essentially
`the same; PDso of rapamycin was slightly lower (9.5 mg/kg) for subcutaneous than for oral (11 mg/kg)
`administration, which corroborates the results of bioavailabiJity studies (Fig. l). STEINBERG et al. 8)
`
`Table 1. Protective effect of rapamycin, amphoteri(cid:173)
`cin B and nystatin administered orally to mice
`systemically
`infected with C. a/bicans A TCC
`11,651
`
`Table 2. Protective effect of rapamycin, amphoteri(cid:173)
`cin B and nystatin administered subcutaneously
`to mice systemically
`infected with C. a/bicans
`ATCC 11,651
`
`Antibiotic
`
`Dose
`(mg/kg)a
`
`I Survival I PDso
`(mg/kg)c
`( %)b
`
`Antibiotic
`
`Dose
`(mg/kg)"'
`
`I Survival
`( %)b
`
`PD so
`(mg/kg)c
`
`1 l.O
`
`Rapamycin
`
`0
`7.5
`10.0
`12.5
`15.0
`20.0
`
`0
`22.7
`52.9
`90.0
`96.5
`97.3
`
`9.5
`
`Rapamycin
`
`A mphoterici n
`B
`
`Nystatin
`(unit/kg)
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`-~---~-·-
`
`0
`7.5
`10.0
`12.5
`15.0
`I 20.0
`! 0
`0.25
`0.50
`1.00
`
`0
`2,000
`3,000
`4,000
`
`0
`12.5
`30.0
`63 .1
`86.3
`100.0
`
`0
`72.7
`94.7
`96.4
`
`0
`7 .1
`14. 2
`30.7
`
`<0.25
`
`>4,000
`(units/kg)
`
`Amphotericin
`B
`
`Nystatin
`(units/kg)
`
`0
`0
`81.8
`0. 25
`95.0
`0.50
`96.2
`1.00
`- - - - - - - - ' - - - - - - - - - - - -
`0
`0
`2,000
`0
`3,000
`0
`4,000
`0
`
`<0.25
`
`>4,000
`(units/kg)
`
`a Treatment: 1, 4 and 24 hours after infection.
`b Observation at 7 days.
`Infectious dose: 6.5 >: 106 cells.
`c
`
`a. Treatment: 1, 4 and 24 hours after infection.
`b Observation at 7 days.
`Infectious dose: 7 x t 0 6 cells.
`c
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1047
`Baker
`Page 004
`
`

`

`VOL. XXXI NO. 6
`
`THE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS
`
`543
`
`Table 3. Protective effect of rapamycin (20 mg/kg) and amphotericin B ( 1 mg/kg) administered orally or
`subcutaneously to mice systemically infected with C. a/bicans ATCC 11,651
`
`Antibiotic and route
`of
`administration
`
`Treatment A
`I
`
`18 days
`
`30 days11
`
`Percent survival
`I
`I
`
`18 days
`
`Treatment B
`I
`
`---
`30 daysb
`
`--
`
`--
`
`26.6
`66.6
`33.6
`
`93.3
`93.3
`100.0
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`Infected
`
`Non-infected
`control
`
`Rapamycin, oral
`Rapamycin, s. c.
`Amphotericin B, oral
`
`46.6
`93.3
`93.3
`
`33.3
`46.6
`40.0
`
`I
`
`I
`
`--
`
`.
`
`Rapamycin, oral
`Rapamycin, s. c.
`Amphotericin B, oral
`
`100
`100
`ND
`
`100
`100
`ND
`
`93.3
`86.6
`53.3
`
`93.3
`93.3
`100.0
`
`I,
`Infectious dose: 3.15~<106 cells.
`n Treatment A: 1, 4 and 24 hours after infection.
`b Treatment B: I, 4 and 24 hours, and 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 days after infection.
`Infectious dose: 5.0 x 106 cells.
`ND: not determined.
`
`reported the PDso of amphotericin B in experimental C. albicans infection of mice to be < 0.55 mg/kg,
`per os, and < 0.32 mg/kg, subcutaneously.
`In another study, rapamycin per os and subcutaneously, or amphotericin B, per os, were given at
`the doses that were shown, in the previous experiments, to give almost complete protection to mice
`systemically infected with C. albicans, i.e. 20 mg rapamycin/kg and l mg amphotericin B/kg, given at
`1, 4 and 24 hours after infection. Animals were observed for 18 and 30 days (Treatment A). The
`results are presented in the first and second columns of Table 3. The highest percentage of deaths oc(cid:173)
`curred between day 7 (Tables 1 and 2) and day 18 (Table 3).
`It would appear that rapamycin controlled
`the infection for a period of 7 days with a subsequent mortality of 53 % between days 7 and 18. Rapa(cid:173)
`mycin, given subcutaneously, and amphotericin B, per os, protected 93.3 % of the mice for 18 days (Table
`3). The survival rate at 30 days were essentially the same for rapamycin, given oraJly or subcutaneously,
`and amphotericin B, given orally.
`In a paralJel study, after the initial three treatments, a single daily dose was administered for 6 days
`and the animals were observed for 18 and 30 days (Treatment B). The results are reported in the third
`and fourth columns of Table 3. The additional daily treatment (for 6 days) with rapamycin given orally
`extended the percent survival rate from 7 days to 18 days. The daily treatment with rapamycin admin(cid:173)
`istered subcutaneously did not significantly affect the percentage of survivors over the initial treatment
`after 18 days of observation. After 30 days of observation, the percent survival was higher with subcu(cid:173)
`taneous treatment than with oral treatment, but not much higher than the initial subcutaneous treatment
`(Treatment A). The percentage of survivors with amphotericin B after daily treatment and 18 days of
`observation was significantly lower than that of Treatment A; this may be due to the combination of drug
`toxicity and infection. After 30 days of observation, the percentage of survivors with amphotericin B
`In conclusion, we would suggest that in the in vfro
`(Treatment A) was not significantly different.
`evaluation of an anti-Candida agent, irregardless of treatment, the test animals should be kept for 30
`days after infection, and the survivors observed after 7, 18 and 30 days.
`In the course of these experiments C. a/bica11s was regularly reisolated from animals treated with
`rapamycin; the cultures showed no increase in MIC, an indication that the resistance of candidal cells
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1047
`Baker
`Page 005
`
`

`

`544
`
`THE JOUUNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS
`
`JUNE 1978
`
`did not develop during treatment.
`
`Fig. 3. Protective effect of rapamycin and nystatin
`against vaginal candidosis in rats.
`
`~ Rapamycin !SOmg/ko fllrafs1
`t=:J Nysfatin 40,000units/kg 112 rats}
`~ No treatment rinfected control)
`Ill rats)
`
`12
`
`Protection against Vaginal Candidosis
`A number of female
`rats were infected
`intravaginally by means of lhe sponge plug
`technique described in Materials and Methods
`and 34 pro,·ed to carry the inrection (Fig. 3, day-
`1>. They were grouped as follows: group A (11
`rats) received no treatment (control); group B (J 2
`rats) was treated with Mycostatin; group C ( 11
`rats) \\'as treated with rapamyi.::in. Oral treat(cid:173)
`ments started on clay 0 and lasted for 8 days.
`A II animals \Vere examined on days 1, 4, 6, 8 and
`11 ( 3 days after cessation of therapy) after the
`beginning of therapy. The histogram in Fig. 3
`reports the number of animals having vagina)
`cultures with moderate (3 +) and heavy (4-r-)
`growth of C. nlbicaus. At the end of therapy (day 8) the cure rates were: 6 of 12 (50~~) for Mycostalin,
`8 of 11 (73 ° ~) for rapamycin, and 3 of 11 (27 ~~) for spontaneous cure. Three days after cessation of
`treatment (day 11) no change was recorded for Mycostatin. but 10 of the 11 rats <91 ~-~) treated with
`rapamycin \Vere cured.
`Histological examination of infected vaginas and normal vag!nas in which sterile plugs had been
`inserted (non-infected, non-treated control) showed some degree of irritation cu used by these plugs, but
`the puruknt exudate was present only in the vaginas containing infected plugs.
`
`-I
`
`8
`II
`4
`j End of therapy
`in1erapy initiated
`Days of
`therapy
`
`6
`
`Discussion
`
`It \Vas previously reported'·: that rapamycin is more active than candicidin and nystatin against
`clinical isolates of C. albicaus; the MIC"s obtained with candicid!n and nystatin were within the range
`reported by 0ROUHET2>.
`It was also reported that rapamycin was more active than amphotericin B
`against eight species of Candida; only C. pseudotropicalis was more sensitive to amphotericin B.
`In the present study, rapamycin was found not to be affected by pH between 6 and 8, but at pH 4
`there was complete loss of activity. The MIC and MFC of rapamycin against C. a/bicans were not in(cid:173)
`In the presence of 5 % horse serum, the antibiotic lost its in vitro
`fluenced by the size of inoculum.
`activity possibly due to the binding of rapamycin to serum components. This binding must be rever(cid:173)
`sible, since bioavailabiUty data in mice and dogs demonstrated that rapamycin is present in the blood at
`a level well exceeding its MIC against C. a/bicans (Figs. 1 and 2), and was sufficient to eradicate severe
`systemic candidosis in mice (Tables 1 and 2).
`In the ill l'ivo studies rapamycin, given orally or subcutaneously, was compared to amphotericin B,
`an antibiotic effective in the treatment of systemic candidosis. The dose selected was based on an initial
`study in which both antibiotics yielded 96.2,..., 100% survival after 7 days of observation.
`Rapamycin at 20 mg/kg, per os and subcutaneously, and amphotericin B at 1 mg/kg, oralJy, adminis(cid:173)
`tered at 1, 4 and 24 hours after infection gave approximately the same percent survival after a 30-day
`observation period (Treatment A). When the above treatment was extended by an additional daily
`treatment for 6 days (Treatment B), the percent survivals for rapamycin and amphotericin B given orally
`were similar, but subcutaneous administration of rapamycin gave higher survival after 30 days of
`observation. Rapamycin was also found very active orally in the treatment of an experimental vaginal
`candidosis in rats. The high in i•fro activity of rapamycin, combined with its low acute toxicity (lower
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1047
`Baker
`Page 006
`
`

`

`VOL. XXXI 7'0. 6
`
`THE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS
`
`545
`
`than that of amphotericin 8 9>) and good oraJ absorption, makes it a possible candidate for the treatment
`of vagina) candidosis, as well as acute and chronic systemic candidosis.
`
`References
`
`1) BENNETT, J. V.; J. L. BRODIE, E. J. BENNER & W. M. M. KIRBY: SimpJified, accurate method for antibiotic
`assay of clinical specimens. Appl. Microbiol. 14: 170-- 177, 1966
`2) DROUHET, E.: Some biological activities of antifungal antibiotics and their mode of action. "Ciba
`Foundation Symposium on Systemic Mycoses''. G. E.W. WOLSTENHOLME & R. PORTER Eds., J. & A.
`Churchill, London, pp. 206-240, 1968
`3) GoLD, W.~ H. A. STOUT, J. F. PAGANO & R. DoNov1cK: Amphotericins A and B. antifungal antibiotics
`produced by a streptomycete. I.
`In w"tro studies. Antibiotics Ann. 1955/1956: 579.-586, 1956
`4) HAZE~. E. L. & R. BRow:-.i: Fungicidin, an antibiotic produced by a soil actinomycete. Proc. Soc. Exp.
`Biol. 76: 93-97, 1951
`5) REED, L. J. & H. MUENCH: A simple method of estimating 50 percent end points. Amer. J. Hyg. 27:
`493-497. 1938
`6) SEHGAL, S. N.; H. BAKER & C. VF.ZINA: Rapamycin (A Y-22,989), a new antifungal antibiotic. II. Fermen(cid:173)
`tation, isolation and characterization. J. Antibiotics 28: 727-732, 1975
`7) SmoRowrcz, A.; H. BAKER & C. VF:ztNA: Rapamycin (AY-22, 989), a new antifungal antibiotic: in l1itro
`(Sept. 24- 26, 1975,
`and in i•fro studies. Abst. 26, 15th Intcrsci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents & Chemother.
`Washington, D. C.).
`8) STEINBERG, B. A.; W. P. JAMBOR & L. 0. SUYDAM: Amphotericins A and B: two new antifungal antibiotics
`possessing high activity against deep-seated and superficial mycoses. Antibiotics Ann. 1955/1956: 574
`-578, 1956
`9) UTZ, J.P.; J.E. BENNEIT, M. W. BRANDISS, W. T. BUTLER & G. J. H1LL: Amphotericin B toxicity. Ann.
`Intern. Med. 61 : 334- 354, 1964
`10} VEZINA, c.; A. KUDELSKI & s. N. SEHGAL: Rapamycin (A Y-22,989), a new antifungal antibiotic. I.
`Taxonomy of the producing streptomycete and isolation of the active principle. J. Antibiotics 28: 721-
`726, 1975
`
`Breckenridge Exhibit 1047
`Baker
`Page 007
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket